@@thirtyfiveeyes your videos are much more helpful and instructive than most other YT "photography" channels that are mainly pushing the latest expensive digicam or lens. Much appreciated, thank you sir!
You surprise me.I love experimenting and your story is solid. Excellent Remember that ISO is NOT sensitivity of the sensor when using a digital camera , it is APPLIED GAIN, done after the shot taken in BASIC ISO, which is basically the same you do in post but it is done in camera (software is adjusted to the sensor) Modern camera can easy recover 4 stops under in post and in your case you probably have even better control over the results. Keep on experimenting man, thats where the fun is IMO. Thanks for sharing
Yes I know but just for the info. Al lot of people who want to get into IR shooting find themself doing it with IR filters on digital cameras which gives you the same challenges
I find that using my C330 is a good way to shoot IR, because it removes the need to take off the filter, or using a rangefinder instead of an SLR. But, I have that luxury and realize not everyone does. The light source will also affect the exposure, depending on how much IR your lights are throwing off. LEDs may produce less, but… I haven’t tested this theory 🤷♂️
IR requires different focus at shorter distances, as you would do for portraits. Most of your shots are blurry, because you didn’t adjust the focus properly, I think. This wasn’t a problem for your landscape shots because they were further away
Thanks for doing this work, interesting results.
awesome stuff
Thank you so much!
Ghostly effect. Very nice.
Thank you!
@@thirtyfiveeyes your videos are much more helpful and instructive than most other YT "photography" channels that are mainly pushing the latest expensive digicam or lens. Much appreciated, thank you sir!
You surprise me.I love experimenting and your story is solid.
Excellent
Remember that ISO is NOT sensitivity of the sensor when using a digital camera , it is APPLIED GAIN, done after the shot taken in BASIC ISO, which is basically the same you do in post but it is done in camera (software is adjusted to the sensor)
Modern camera can easy recover 4 stops under in post and in your case you probably have even better control over the results.
Keep on experimenting man, thats where the fun is IMO.
Thanks for sharing
What? This is film.
Yes I know but just for the info.
Al lot of people who want to get into IR shooting find themself doing it with IR filters on digital cameras which gives you the same challenges
I find that using my C330 is a good way to shoot IR, because it removes the need to take off the filter, or using a rangefinder instead of an SLR. But, I have that luxury and realize not everyone does. The light source will also affect the exposure, depending on how much IR your lights are throwing off. LEDs may produce less, but… I haven’t tested this theory 🤷♂️
This is excellent advice thank you!
@@thirtyfiveeyes no problem! Sharing is caring. 😸👍
IR requires different focus at shorter distances, as you would do for portraits. Most of your shots are blurry, because you didn’t adjust the focus properly, I think. This wasn’t a problem for your landscape shots because they were further away
The IR mark on the lens is more of a guide. I think you will improve with practice with each specific lens
Interesting! Thanks. Any tips on measuring IR focus distance for closer up images like portraits?