What´s a RAT? RAM AIR TURBINE! Explained by "CAPTAIN" Joe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 бер 2017
  • ✈️WANT TO BECOME A PILOT?✈️ bit.ly/474j06T
    📗📗📗GET MY NEW BOOK amzn.to/32TH4x7 📗📗📗
    📸 INSTAGRAM FLYWITHCAPTAINJOE: goo.gl/TToDlg 📸
    🌐MY WEBSITE: goo.gl/KGTSWK 🌐
    🛒👕---► T-SHIRT SHOP goo.gl/Svrqmx ◄ --👕-🛒
    📖👨 NEW FACEBOOK PAGE: goo.gl/heUKGb 👨📖
    ▼▼My FLIGHT-KIT I highly recommend for you guys▼▼
    MY HEADSET: amzn.to/2CrTrzz
    MY SUNGLASSES: amzn.to/2VY6FNo
    MY PILOT BAG: amzn.to/2DiWKux
    Company iPad: amzn.to/2W1zM2n
    ▼▼The VIDEO EQUIPMENT I use in my studio and outdoors▼▼
    MY CAMERA: amzn.to/2T1VK3g
    LIGHTING: amzn.to/2szSRv4
    IN-FLIGHT RECORDINGS: amzn.to/2VY7A0g
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dear friends and followers, welcome back to my channel.
    Today´s topic is another very important one. What is the ram air turbine, or better known as the RAT.
    We´ll be looking at some basic system knowledge on the Airbus Hydraulics (the green, blue and yellow system) and then dive straight in to an ELEC EMER CONFIG.
    You´ll see how the ram air turbine is deployed and I´ll go into more detail about the ram air turbine duties. We´ll use a AC BUS 1&2 FAULT as a primary example and how the RAT produces electricity. And the second scenario will be a DUAL ENGINE FAILURE, and how the RAT provides electrical power plus hydraulic power to be able to control the aircraft in such an emergency event.
    This is a basic explanation of the Airbus A320 Ram Air Turbine. Future videos where we´ll look at the hydraulic system in more detail are in the making.
    Thanks for watching, see you latest next thursday, all the best your "Captain" Joe
    INSTAGRAM FLYWITHCAPTAINJOE: goo.gl/TToDlg
    MY WEBSITE: goo.gl/KGTSWK
    Thanks to Lars Hentschel providing me with the thumbnail picture, make sure to check out his pictures on www.airliners.net
    Special thanks to HamburgVideosHD for providing me with this very rare footage of an A321 landing with the RAT deployed! Check out his channel for more great videos!
    Background song: Stellardrone - Cepheid
    Outro Song: Joakim Karud - Wish you were here
    Equipment I use:
    Camera: amzn.to/2nEHPDM
    Microphone: amzn.to/2nff2oF
    Lights: amzn.to/2nEPGkU
    Copyright @flywithcaptainjoe
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @krisztiankormos2506
    @krisztiankormos2506 7 років тому +391

    I was at Brooklands museum where a restored Concorde is on display with the RAT extended. When the tour guide asked if anyone knew what it was for, a little girl said that it was an outboard motor so if they had to ditch the aircraft in water, they could get to shore. Just a funny story I thought I'd share.

    • @Damien.D
      @Damien.D 5 років тому +18

      Let's try that in the Hudson.

    • @bikerboy3k
      @bikerboy3k 5 років тому +11

      That's not bad at all!

    • @TheXcalculusx
      @TheXcalculusx 4 роки тому +4

      May be we shall have something like that in the future, who knows

    • @j-c4997
      @j-c4997 4 роки тому +3

      Krisztian Kormos great idea she could be an aerospace engineer

    • @certifiedbruh2180
      @certifiedbruh2180 4 роки тому

      james ndung'u Then we'd need flying boats again

  • @thetruthisoutthereofficial
    @thetruthisoutthereofficial 7 років тому +1176

    The rat is a small animal inside the belly of the aircraft and incase of double engine failure it will start running inside its hamster wheel and turn the engines with the hamster wheel so that the aircraft has engine power to land safely

    • @supa3ek
      @supa3ek 7 років тому +37

      The Truth Is Out There actually thats kinda what happens only the rat is just wind turning the cage that generates electric power : ) same principle!

    • @NipapornP
      @NipapornP 7 років тому +25

      And China Airlines use little children for that, right?

    • @heavyinfantry1692
      @heavyinfantry1692 5 років тому +7

      *starts to band him* well i guess the secret is out

    • @nancylee1762
      @nancylee1762 5 років тому +2

      The Truth Is Out There Great explanation , thank you!

    • @woodencart3662
      @woodencart3662 5 років тому

      and it is china eastern airline......

  • @hunchojack1858
    @hunchojack1858 7 років тому +126

    I Love That He Is Always Smileing :) It Makes Me Smile

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  7 років тому +56

      Stay positive!

    • @emercycrite
      @emercycrite 5 років тому +2

      It helps that he’s got a very handsome smile too!

    • @binduanand6253
      @binduanand6253 4 роки тому

      Not negative

    • @stefan4321
      @stefan4321 4 роки тому

      Not Corona positive 🙄😅

    • @mickeysmiths
      @mickeysmiths 4 місяці тому

      ​@@flywithcaptainjoe ​​ When MH370 was gliding to the surface of the ocean with the captain controlling it in the cockpit, & only RAT power available (but batteries too), at which point (e.g. 10,000ft) would he have tried to set the wings' flight surfaces (via the centre electrical system) to slow the plane as best he could for the ditching? Would the available flight surfaces take longer to set, due to being on the secondary power grid? I think he was aware of the slowness of the secondary power grid as he would have simmed it, so he was prepared for the delay to set those surfaces. What do you think? Thanks in advance. Mickey 👍

  • @Nortonmascota
    @Nortonmascota 7 років тому +206

    3:47 "RATMAN ON".
    Is it a superhero?

    • @mrc14_2
      @mrc14_2 6 років тому +1

      LOL

    • @47Str8
      @47Str8 5 років тому +14

      Da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da da -- RAT MAN!

    • @netsky3
      @netsky3 5 років тому +4

      It is in Italy. Very funny comics.

    • @kingghidorah8106
      @kingghidorah8106 5 років тому +1

      @@netsky3 il uomo topo

    • @netsky3
      @netsky3 5 років тому

      @@kingghidorah8106 yes, kinda of :D

  • @winni223
    @winni223 7 років тому +56

    Thank you! Yes, the famous Gimli Glider was the case when the RAT helped to remain control over the plane.

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  7 років тому +11

      Correct, as mentioned in the official incidents at the end of the video!

    • @muhammadabdulwahabkhan2808
      @muhammadabdulwahabkhan2808 7 років тому

      winni223 i loved that one....how the pilot landed that ...omg

    • @fast_wifi6905
      @fast_wifi6905 7 років тому +1

      I have a question for you captain, do pilots listen to music while cruising?

    • @user-po6hn9id1t
      @user-po6hn9id1t 7 років тому

      Fast_Wifi yes, usually they prefer Psarantonis

    • @Zzz-ui4mt
      @Zzz-ui4mt 7 років тому +2

      was that the side slip landing?

  • @camicus-3249
    @camicus-3249 7 років тому +31

    "A RAT is one of the things you rarely see on an air plane." I would hope so

  • @JONESSTI01
    @JONESSTI01 7 років тому +52

    this "rat" system was a key component of the safe emergency landing from FL360 (36,000ft) after a fuel miscalculation on an air canada flight. resulting in both engines flaming out with literally only minutes of alert warnings from the fuel pump pressure indicators. (from warning to engine flame out). The boeing aircraft landed safely but the nose gear didn't lock correctly and collapsed but the plane came to a safe halt at gimli airfield in the USA.
    this aircraft was nicknamed the "GIMLI GLIDER" and flew many more years of service after undergoing small repairs :)

    • @oseo943
      @oseo943 7 років тому

      Gimli glider story :-P

    • @donsample1002
      @donsample1002 7 років тому +1

      oseo943
      And Gimli is in Canada

    • @hannahapor4856
      @hannahapor4856 6 років тому +2

      Gimli Glider is one of my favorite story in terms of aviation accidents

    • @Teverell
      @Teverell 5 років тому

      @@hannahapor4856 Same!! (TACA110 is another one of my favourites; check it out if you're not familiar with it! Mayday episode 'Nowhere to Land'.)

    • @j-c4997
      @j-c4997 4 роки тому

      Thomas yeah Canada was switching from Gallons to Kilograms and they asked for the amount of fuel in gallons and ground gave them that amount in kilograms.

  • @briansmobile1
    @briansmobile1 7 років тому +40

    Love your videos Captian Joe. I love knowing what's going on in the planes I fly in.

  • @thephantom1492
    @thephantom1492 7 років тому +107

    One of the most notable use of the RAM is the gimli glider. remember that one that ran out of fuel due to a misconversion between imperial and metric? Yes, that one. No fuel, no engines, no APU, no control.

    • @jospi2
      @jospi2 7 років тому +8

      The same with the Azores glider.

    • @Rathtrainer
      @Rathtrainer 7 років тому +11

      That's the most primitive mistake you can make: "Oops! We ran out of fuel!"

    • @Keithguinn97
      @Keithguinn97 7 років тому

      thephantom1492 yea. Basically crap has really hit the fan when you need to use it hehe

    • @TheDr.01
      @TheDr.01 7 років тому

      thephantom1492 hahahaaha😂😂😂

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  7 років тому +22

      True, I´ve mentioned it in the official incidents at the end of the video!

  • @bikestailer7430
    @bikestailer7430 7 років тому +407

    Hey Jo, in the movie "Sully" sully turned on the APU. The movie didn't show the RAT.!

  • @sir-dil-a-lot
    @sir-dil-a-lot 7 років тому +162

    brilliant video. Just want to say that your spoken English is marvellous. And possibly better than some of our own native speakers.

    • @Rathtrainer
      @Rathtrainer 7 років тому +23

      If I'm not mistaken, learning English is a requirement for being a commercial pilot. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @austro-hungarianempire3891
      @austro-hungarianempire3891 7 років тому +13

      I don't think it is a requirement for Airchina pilots, since some don't even know the difference between MikeAlpha and November

    • @TheDr.01
      @TheDr.01 7 років тому +3

      Sir Adil-a-lot hahahahaahaha

    • @minxythemerciless
      @minxythemerciless 7 років тому +6

      Some of the vowels indicate he learned from a regional British speaker. Or possibly second-hand from same. The way he clips some of his words is very British English.

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  7 років тому +43

      Thank you very much, means a lot to me :)

  • @DominiqueTouel666
    @DominiqueTouel666 7 років тому +91

    " The RAT was found in
    the extended position when the airplane was recovered from the water. Both RAT blades were
    present, and no major deformation of the blades was observed. " From the official report of the NTSB about the Hudson river landing

    • @Caleb_Guffey
      @Caleb_Guffey 5 років тому +2

      Dominique Touel really I found the rat making a nest in my boat.

    •  4 роки тому +1

      But why didn't they use the APU?

    • @danilolimadossantos1
      @danilolimadossantos1 4 роки тому +8

      @ They used the APU, and they didn't deploy RAT, it was deployed automatically, before Apu kicked in

    • @yukewang1832
      @yukewang1832 4 роки тому +1

      True, and only because the plane deployed it automatically. They determined it's not necessary cuz they had APU started

  • @dingle849
    @dingle849 7 років тому +573

    I thought it was to slice the birds up.

    • @mthompson965
      @mthompson965 7 років тому +90

      That's actually what it's for, but due to people getting butt hurt, they tell you that it's some lame generator.

    • @dingle849
      @dingle849 7 років тому +62

      I guess that's the "fresh" poultry they sell in business class.

    • @Rhoddy82
      @Rhoddy82 7 років тому +10

      +PASSwordUSERname Lmao. That's really funny

    • @LacoteCohen
      @LacoteCohen 7 років тому +6

      PASSwordUSERname lol

    • @southvietnam4690
      @southvietnam4690 7 років тому +10

      dingle you ever see a seagull at 12,000 ft?

  • @TheFlightSimChannel
    @TheFlightSimChannel 7 років тому +20

    Nice video again Joe! Great to see your channel doing so well!

  • @kennethrussel7009
    @kennethrussel7009 7 років тому +2

    Thanks Captain for educating us on the RAT. Properly explained. Love your videos, both learning and fun at the same time.

  • @bryanjudefernandez2195
    @bryanjudefernandez2195 7 років тому +5

    wow your channel grew so fast. i was with you ever since 20k

  • @shadow404atl
    @shadow404atl 7 років тому +17

    My dad, 1Lt David B Waldrop III, had to eject from an F-105 (over Friendly territory) during the Vietnam War because of an engine turbine failure. The RAT deployed and gave him electrical and hydraulics after he shut down the engine. This gave him enough time to calmly and carefully prepare for the ejection and steer his plane into a safe trajectory for it to crash and maximize his chances for a safe ejection.

  • @andersjan25
    @andersjan25 4 роки тому +8

    Here after PIA crash. RIP.
    They spotted RAT was active on the doomed flight.

  • @ella_komiya
    @ella_komiya 7 років тому +1

    Another great example of how a Rat worked very well is the Air Canada Gimli Glider case.
    Such an amazing feat of landing from those pilots.

    • @jamesfunk7614
      @jamesfunk7614 5 років тому

      I assume jet fuel is used to power the APU, so the Gimli Glider wasn't able to use the APU. They had to use the RAT to have any power at all.

  • @kasutkuhitam
    @kasutkuhitam 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for the video Captain. The Gimli Glider incident involving Air Canada Flight 143, and later made into a movie "Falling From the Sky Flight 174", where RAT was deployed and one of the main reasons the plane could be landed without any power from the engines and hydraulics.

  • @nidhin4173
    @nidhin4173 7 років тому +162

    God only knows why I am watching this video at 2 am.

    • @Rathtrainer
      @Rathtrainer 7 років тому +11

      2 PM here. Hello person on the other side of the planet. How are you?

    • @robertdraxel7175
      @robertdraxel7175 7 років тому +2

      You live in India, not by name, by a short logic I deduced...

    • @robertdraxel7175
      @robertdraxel7175 7 років тому +2

      Are you from California? Or maybe Vancouver Canada?

    • @robertdraxel7175
      @robertdraxel7175 7 років тому +2

      I give you my coordinate: 23 pm

    • @clarencebitegeko7079
      @clarencebitegeko7079 7 років тому +2

      Nidhin Varkey Varghese 1:18 am here 😊

  • @esztivizo
    @esztivizo 7 років тому +4

    Hi Joe, thank you so much for making these highly informational but still very understandable videos for all the aviation enthusiasts out there, such as me. My biggest career dream is to one day become an airline pilot and your videos are motivating me every day. My question is, what is the most common malfunction on an aiplane and what's the standard operational procedure during the event? I wish you all the best and keep up the good work!

  • @themarshmellow410
    @themarshmellow410 7 років тому +1

    Gotta say, never had much interest in airplanes but after watching a few videos from you ive grown intrested. Its really cool how these huge metal vehicles operate and how all the backup system work. nice to see so good explanations and i feel a lot more safer now when flying (i felt safe, but safer now). You've got my sub!

  • @shaun_rambaran
    @shaun_rambaran 5 років тому

    That's such a clever device.
    It's so reassuring leaning about all of these ingenius redundencies. They help to counteract the too-many episodes of 'Seconds from Disaster' I've been looking at.

  • @vasek1986
    @vasek1986 7 років тому +24

    another amazing video Joe, keep up the good job!

  • @SwirlingSoul
    @SwirlingSoul 7 років тому +5

    Nice thing to háve on a plane! Makes me feel a whole lot safer.

    • @SwirlingSoul
      @SwirlingSoul 7 років тому

      I know, but the idea of a dead stick landing, withOUT a RAT....now thát is scary.

  • @niz6543
    @niz6543 7 років тому

    im glad you speek slow and clear its good to understand for me :) thank you

  • @MrRay105
    @MrRay105 2 роки тому

    The ease at which you explain & teach Aircraft systems & control is just breathtaking! I have learnt a lot of about Aircraft just from your videos!! Amazing!!

  • @Caleb_Guffey
    @Caleb_Guffey 5 років тому +13

    2:48 wtf

  • @QuickMovieTV
    @QuickMovieTV 7 років тому +11

    Hi Captain Joe,
    erst einmal ein großes Dankeschön für deine Videos, welche du, trotz deines durchaus stressigen Berufes, hochlädst. Nun eine kurze Frage:
    Kannst du ein Video über die genauen Unterschiede der Geschwindigkeiten (IAS, TAS, GS, Mach) machen, denn ich verstehe diese noch nicht genau.
    Vielen Dank und mach weiter so!! :)

    • @Revoltec120
      @Revoltec120 7 років тому +1

      IAS: Angezeigte Fluggeschwindigkeit relativ zur umgebenden Luftmasse. Wird auch Unkorrigierte Eigenschgeschwindigkeit genannt. Wird direkt vom Staurohr gemessen= fehlerhafte messungen. Bei Airlinern wird dies allerdings korrigiert. Hier spricht man von CAS dann. Trotzdem wird es auch als IAS benannt, also bei Airlinern IAS=CAS.Unterhalb von FL270 ist IAS von Bedeutung. IAS= Die ''wichtigeste'' Geschwindigkeit, da die angezeigte Geschwindigkeit IAS über den Staudruck
      gemessen wird. Der Staudruck ist ein Mass für den Auftrieb. Somit ist auch
      die IAS ein Mass für den Auftrieb.

    • @Revoltec120
      @Revoltec120 7 років тому +1

      TAS: True Air Speed. Die ''echte'' Geschwindigkeit bezüglich der umgebenden Luft. Bedeutet hier wird alles berechnet. Wind, Windrichtung etc.

    • @Revoltec120
      @Revoltec120 7 років тому +1

      GS: Ground Speed. Geschwindigkeit bezüglich der Erdoberfläche

    • @Revoltec120
      @Revoltec120 7 років тому +1

      Mach: Alles über FL270 ist Mach ''wichtig''. Geschwindigkeit bezüglich der Schallgeschwindigkeit. Mach 1 ist Schallgeschwindigkeit. Passagier Flugzeuge fliegen bis zu 0,92 Mach (nur die großen 747-400etc.)

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  7 років тому +5

      Danke! Die Themen werden auf jeden Fall in Zukunft geklärt! Grüsse joe

  • @crazygirl_irl2189
    @crazygirl_irl2189 7 років тому +2

    Hi Captain Joe! Just to let you know that your videos are getting better and better every upload. Can't wait for next videos. Keep it up ;)

  • @stantonbentley2534
    @stantonbentley2534 7 років тому

    Great video! Gives a small but interesting insight into how much engineering goes into modern passenger planes. There's so much the designers have to think about.

  • @-ragingpotato-937
    @-ragingpotato-937 7 років тому +29

    Yo dawg, he heard you like redundancy, so we gave redundancy to your redundancy so you can be redundant while being redundant.

    • @DBR00
      @DBR00 3 роки тому

      As far as I’m concerned, that’s redundant. Don’t you think?

  • @jamietube5856
    @jamietube5856 7 років тому +29

    Please explain the WiFi on airplanes

    • @AMStationEngineer
      @AMStationEngineer 7 років тому +11

      Most in-flight broadband systems utilize 'proximity linking' to connect to cellphone towers while over areas where cellular signals are available. For areas where no broadband cellular exists, Ku band satellite communications is used to interconnect. I believe they use a technique referred to (in engineering slang terminology as "spot beam projection mapping/tracking", which anticipates the route of flight, and maintains communication with one of three satellites triangulating the signal.
      The WIFI system used on commercial aircraft does not, in any way (with the exception of the 400~ power system) interconnect with anything else on the aircraft, to protect from hacking, or a cascade interruption which could affect any of the aircraft's systems.

    • @michaelspears8032
      @michaelspears8032 7 років тому +1

      They can also connect to satelites, an example of this is inmarsat. Not sure entirely but I know inmarsat can provide wifi through satelites

    • @seanet1310
      @seanet1310 7 років тому +1

      what aspect of wifi on planes?

    • @m1ke1981
      @m1ke1981 5 років тому +1

      He did a video on that. It’s here somewhere

    • @justinpersaud863
      @justinpersaud863 5 років тому

      Wifi costs money, all you need to know bud

  • @step2191
    @step2191 7 років тому

    A wealth of knowledge, thanks Capt. Joe! Have a good weekend!

  • @BoulevardFan28
    @BoulevardFan28 7 років тому

    You explain complex systems in such an easy-to-understand way!

  • @novymundus
    @novymundus 7 років тому +3

    In June I fly with Airberlin to Rhodos, maybe you are the Pilot ^^

    • @deniztugay8877
      @deniztugay8877 7 років тому

      Lennart hi, don't forget to visit Marmaris with www.yesilmarmaris.com fast catamaran's.. the are great)))

  • @artoismta
    @artoismta 7 років тому +4

    Sorry about this buddy but in sully captain Sullenberger started up the APU

    • @bennylofgren3208
      @bennylofgren3208 7 років тому +1

      Donavan Emanuel They used both.

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  7 років тому +11

      Donavan Emanuel by the time the APU started the RAT was already out,it takes about 1minute to start the APU.

  • @EricWangericericericericeric
    @EricWangericericericericeric 7 років тому

    Your English is so well spoken and you're my primary source for learning about aviation. Thank you!!

  • @DaveNorthWest
    @DaveNorthWest 3 роки тому

    This is awesome. Your channel has taught me so much. I take allot of flights and it's cool knowing how all the stuff works. Thanks

  • @Arcadiez
    @Arcadiez 7 років тому +6

    Can you tell me the idea/concept of pulling the stick back on a stall instead of pushing it forward like the rest of aircrafts?
    If you enter alternative mode which shows on the ECAM you still have to push it forward as the plane can't recover by itself(That air france flight failed to acknowledge). You have stick pusher, right?
    Seems better to have a push down moment incase of stall in all modes/scenarios.
    RAT has to have a max speed right? 140kt for low speed. But does it come out at 0.76M automatically?
    Wont it create enormous parasite/profile drag and the blades tip will over speed and stall, maybe even disembark.
    Last question, you may not know this exactly but does the RAT create a yaw moment of the aircraft? If it does, are you restricted in crosswind?
    Sorry for so many questions but the ATPL books don't explain that much about airbus or RAT.
    Keep up the high quality videos captain! :)

    • @Rathtrainer
      @Rathtrainer 7 років тому +3

      Did you see how small the turbine was? I doubt it's able to cause any noticeable torque or drag. The landing gears are larger, and they're meant to be used all the time.
      P.S. Someone please correct me if I am speaking nonsense.

    • @SamiJumppanen
      @SamiJumppanen 7 років тому +1

      Arcadiez I only know what I saw: the blade angle is adjustable, that will prevent overspeeding. But I wonder if you meant the moment it is opening? And the effect on yaw or gliding should be negligible, as there is no significant surface area compared to the size of the plane.

    • @Firecul
      @Firecul 7 років тому +1

      The *only* reason to pull back when stalling is if you are so close to the ground you'll, never regain control. In that case it's better to belly flop rather than nose dive.

    • @Arcadiez
      @Arcadiez 7 років тому

      Rathtrainer VLE for A320 is 280kt EAS or 0.67M so why not a RAT max speed? He stated that the RAT comes out automatically, but that seems irrational incase it has a max speed restriction, even at higher speed the blades will not be able to spin due to too high tip speed and high dynamic pressure.
      Any type of drag at one site compared to other will create a disposable of forces. I'm not focusing on so much on the asymmetric blade effect but more on the fact that you have an object that will create parasite drag, especially as the parasite drag increases with speed.
      The question is, is it noticeable. I know the rudder is extremely strong and the CFM 56 engined are strong but still.
      Got a A320 TR or any aerodynamic engineering/physics degree? :)

    • @Arcadiez
      @Arcadiez 7 років тому

      Firecul42 But on airbus you pull back in all cases except when you're in alternative mode.
      But in every other aircraft, small or big you pitch down to reduce the AOA. Every pilot get taught this, but then get taught to pull back on their airbus TR.. I get your point. But if you're stalled then you only option is to push forward to try to regain control even when you're close to ground otherwise you may fall like a stone especially with swept back wings(Tip stall).

  • @x8BitRain
    @x8BitRain 7 років тому +25

    I recon "PROPELLER ON A JET?" would be a more eye catching title lol.

    • @christopherbazaka1564
      @christopherbazaka1564 7 років тому +7

      but more clickbaity matey, which is lame, see?

    • @x8BitRain
      @x8BitRain 7 років тому +1

      Hey it works though.

    • @notircm
      @notircm 7 років тому +3

      And surely that title would start a "battle" in the comments.... we really don`t need that here.

    • @seanet1310
      @seanet1310 7 років тому +2

      but RATs are also on some turbo propeller aircraft.

    • @flacobandz5324
      @flacobandz5324 6 років тому

      BitRain he dont need the ad money tho

  • @BrianThorstad
    @BrianThorstad 6 років тому

    I love watching this video again and again. Great engineering explained.

  • @patch.4982
    @patch.4982 7 років тому +1

    Nothing better than one of your videos to brighten up my day!
    Clear and competent as always, great job Joe :)
    p.s. are you uploading an outtake video anytime soon? we'd love that!

  • @CCSTechno
    @CCSTechno 7 років тому +3

    Have you the FSLabs A32X ?

  • @peterhunt30
    @peterhunt30 7 років тому +52

    do you like the 787 or the A350XWB

    • @Simoncuong
      @Simoncuong 7 років тому +9

      Peter Hunt s A350

    • @ConorHDGamingBT
      @ConorHDGamingBT 7 років тому +10

      787

    • @itzrally7
      @itzrally7 7 років тому +5

      Peter Hunt A350

    • @peterhunt30
      @peterhunt30 7 років тому +1

      cool

    • @peterhunt30
      @peterhunt30 7 років тому +2

      both are carbon fiber materials do it all comes down to comfort and inside

  • @911gpd
    @911gpd 7 років тому +1

    Great complete explanation :)
    Thanks a lot !

  • @bolanscott7188
    @bolanscott7188 3 роки тому +1

    Never to late to learn something new even if ill never need it.!! Well explained

  • @user-vj6yy9tq8u
    @user-vj6yy9tq8u 7 років тому +5

    Please. I would like to have Japanese subtitles by all means ...

    • @felobatirmoheb4884
      @felobatirmoheb4884 5 років тому +1

      Are u asking for a friend? Because your english is dope

  • @carlfernald4355
    @carlfernald4355 7 років тому +4

    why aren't there multiple RAT's to get more power

    • @psirvent8
      @psirvent8 6 років тому +3

      Because it's only for emergency and in this case one rat is enough to power the essential systems.

    • @emily36130
      @emily36130 5 років тому +2

      A bigger RAT ore multiple RAT's would cause more drag and the plane slows down faster.

    • @kabalder
      @kabalder 5 років тому +2

      Yeah, but another RAT could power the coffee maker.

  • @rudiechinchilla6746
    @rudiechinchilla6746 5 років тому

    Cap.Like your vids!They re so clear and one undestands em with just your explanation and additional help visual resourced.Rudy from Costa Rica

  • @MTGeomancer
    @MTGeomancer 7 років тому +1

    I'm surprised you didn't mention the Gimli Glider incident in Canada. They ran out of fuel halfway through the flight (error in pounds vs kilograms when refueling plus failure of fuel guage) that resulted in the loss of both engines, plus no fuel for the APU, so total loss of electrical power. All they had was the RAT, but they managed to glide it down, land without a nose gear (gravity drop failed to lock), and no major injuries.
    The Miracle on the Hudson flight at least still had the APU, but much less time to react to the situation.

  • @ajmatt
    @ajmatt 7 років тому +3

    Why not add a second RAT on the opposite side?

    • @SkyCharger001
      @SkyCharger001 5 років тому

      Perhaps that space is already used by a different emergency/back-up system.
      Perhaps the PTU.

  • @ayylenny949
    @ayylenny949 7 років тому +86

    By the way at 1:48, you said minimum instead of maximum in case anyone was confused

    • @lennyboy1993
      @lennyboy1993 7 років тому +47

      I'm not a 100% sure but I believe he is correct saying 20min minimum. It would make sense that the batteries are certified for a minimum amount of time and not a maximum. If it is maximum it could also mean they are depleted even after 1min.

    • @molletts
      @molletts 7 років тому +22

      That's correct - the batteries are required to provide power for a *minimum* of 20 minutes. They may provide power for longer but, if they are working properly, they shouldn't run out in less than 20 minutes.
      So, basically, you know you have 20 minutes of battery power. After that, you're running on promises if you can't start the APU or deploy the RAT.

    • @christopherbazaka1564
      @christopherbazaka1564 7 років тому +13

      whats wrong with minimum? I think he was right. Hell, he even typed it onto the screen!

    • @ayylenny949
      @ayylenny949 7 років тому +14

      I stand corrected

    • @Engineer9736
      @Engineer9736 7 років тому +3

      I interpretated it the same as AyyLenny did. Maybe Captain Joe should have explained a bit more in detail in the video why it's a minimum instead of a maximum. The system has to ensure that it can provide a Minimum of 20 minutes which results for the user/pilot in a Maximum of 20 minutes reliability.

  • @istvanotvos6254
    @istvanotvos6254 3 роки тому

    Thank you for your fluent way of explaining!
    😍

  • @mykweb
    @mykweb 7 років тому

    Another fantastic video with a great description.

  • @CM_Burns
    @CM_Burns 7 років тому +5

    RATM = Rage Against The Machine

  • @HomebaseLHR
    @HomebaseLHR 7 років тому +40

    That was not an A320 that you showed first. It was an A321. :-)

    • @prgaviation
      @prgaviation 7 років тому +26

      But the A321 is still a member of the A320 family.

    • @HomebaseLHR
      @HomebaseLHR 7 років тому +6

      PRG Aviation correct, but he explicitly mentioned the Airbus A320 and not the A320 family.

    • @christopherbazaka1564
      @christopherbazaka1564 7 років тому +60

      but whatever, dont be so picky, its not too important for the topic of the video.
      You just wanted to show off your knowledge, I know, its ok.

    • @kdroblox5610
      @kdroblox5610 6 років тому +2

      U cant even tell the difference.It is a A320

    • @heatedpants8437
      @heatedpants8437 6 років тому

      not the matter of confict...haha

  • @shockwave7091
    @shockwave7091 4 роки тому +1

    I literally understand everything!!!
    Thank you

  • @ricktatum
    @ricktatum 4 роки тому

    Thank you for supplying the information about R,A,T, very good narration of explaining how the emergency power works

  • @milanshah4
    @milanshah4 4 роки тому

    I just love the way you explain

  • @Albi1983
    @Albi1983 6 років тому

    Thank you Joe👍👍👍 Recently discovered your channel and enjoyed your videos ever since. Almost better than flight school😅 Keep up the great work 👏 Best regards from Germany 🇩🇪

  • @dennislincoln5369
    @dennislincoln5369 7 років тому

    I really enjoyed this episode about RAT and you explained it very well!!! I'm not a pilot and I understood all of what you were saying!!! Thank you Captain Joe!!!

  • @utterlyawesomevideos7993
    @utterlyawesomevideos7993 7 років тому +3

    I love these videos - I will be a qualified pilot just from sitting at my computer desk soon! Hope to meet you one day in Berlin Joe! if I DO see you, I hope you don't mind if I ask for a photo with you! Cheers!

  • @212Splash
    @212Splash 7 років тому

    Hello Dear Joe, thank you very much for always sharing your knowledge with all of us. I really enjoy each and every one of your videos!

  • @dakerbal
    @dakerbal 3 роки тому +1

    4:23 Something really important about the Hudson crash was that the Captain turned on the APU quickly after the birds hit. While this wasn't listed in any procedure, it was somewhat fundamental to the flight safety. The RAT did deploy momentarily but at such slow speeds for ditching the electrical power may have been limited and the flaps would not have been able to quickly extend; the cabin lighting would also have remained off and some of the cockpit displayed would have been off. Turning on the APU allowed more reliable control over the aircraft *and* most importantly it meant that the aircraft was no longer in alternate law (which it entered once the RAT was deployed); while largely inconclusive in the investigation it was noted that the airspeed of the aircraft was at about the top of VLS (approaching stall speed) and if the Captain had not activated the APU there would have been no stall or VAlphaProt protections whatsoever. It turned out that in the flare for ditching the Captain expected the aircraft to pitch up more to reduce the vertical speed but the aircraft was in normal law thanks to the APU and in VAlphaProt so it refused to pitch up any higher lest it stall; if the aircraft was in alternate law and if it had stalled the vertical speed would likely have been much higher in the ditch and possible less safe.

  • @vim66
    @vim66 7 років тому

    thanks,Joe for introducing us to the nitty gritty of airplane instrumentation.enjoyed the vdo.

  • @alexlopl8978
    @alexlopl8978 7 років тому

    Dear captain Joe
    Thank you for your amazing videos, it's Always à big pleasure to see them. thank you so much

  • @lumin1448
    @lumin1448 6 років тому

    Great video! It helps me a lot understanding :)

  • @Nyck461
    @Nyck461 7 років тому

    Great video.
    Captain Joe. Keep posting more videos like this one.

  • @noenaburnell3245
    @noenaburnell3245 7 років тому

    these are wonderful, interesting informative videos, made by a really lovely man any parent would be proud of.

  • @LinkinPark4ever79
    @LinkinPark4ever79 7 років тому

    Loved it! Great explanation :)

  • @jfpost
    @jfpost 7 років тому +1

    How interesting, you explained it perfectly!

  • @TheSentinel091482
    @TheSentinel091482 7 років тому

    First video from from Joe where I didn't learn anything new because I already knew about this lol but it is still better when Joe explains it.

  • @bobgillis1137
    @bobgillis1137 3 роки тому

    Very cool. The windmill was deployed on Transat flight 236 into the Azores, saving the lives of all aboard.

  • @FuriouslyFurious
    @FuriouslyFurious 7 років тому

    Great explanation with imagery. Thanks!

  • @juliemanarin4127
    @juliemanarin4127 5 років тому

    I love your channel! So informative!

  • @danish5087
    @danish5087 7 років тому

    Wow thanks to your videos I actually understood this video quite clearly!

  • @chiragchandra1779
    @chiragchandra1779 5 років тому

    I love your videos, though I'm a Computer Science student but these videos are truly Fascinating. I'm amazed by your knowledge and Thanks for sharing it with us.

  • @akshaymane5828
    @akshaymane5828 7 років тому

    Nice info Joe. Thank you for the video. Can you do a video on workings around the radio?

  • @omerdayyani
    @omerdayyani 6 років тому

    My technically knowledge is perfect now in airoplane. This is making me very easy to understand and makes me learn more and more.
    Many thanks Caption Joe.

  • @NonSequitur404
    @NonSequitur404 7 років тому

    Great video as always. Would love to know how pilots steer and control the plane on the ground. When taxiing and especially how they align the plane and keep it straight as it accelerates down the runway for takeoff. Thanks!

  • @FireAngelZero
    @FireAngelZero 7 років тому +1

    Love the voice over at "Blue Hydraulic System" at 2:47
    Could you cover in one of your videos why landing gears are tilted in different directions, and why others with double bogies are straight? So why is the 777 and A330 main gear bogies are tilted more towards the back and why the 767 is more forward? Thanks Captain Joe!

  • @nsx276
    @nsx276 7 років тому

    Another great video! Thanks!

  • @BrianThorstad
    @BrianThorstad 7 років тому

    Fantastic video. I've wanted to know about the RAT for a while.

  • @alohatvj
    @alohatvj 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the information 👍

  • @SamiJumppanen
    @SamiJumppanen 7 років тому +2

    RAT MAN ON just sounds awesome :D I wonder what could be the "worst" short description for a function in a jet plane ;)

    • @albertlau128
      @albertlau128 7 років тому

      Structural Integrity Loss maybe?

  • @gianluigiredolfini6154
    @gianluigiredolfini6154 3 роки тому

    Always great explanations thanks much captain

  • @MarechalAviador
    @MarechalAviador 7 років тому

    Great video and explanation Cap.

  • @Canonbyair
    @Canonbyair 7 років тому

    Very good video! Keep up The good work!

  • @albertmanuel9142
    @albertmanuel9142 7 років тому +1

    I always watch your channel when I don't understand the plane's part. #KeepItUp! #Thanks!

  • @gourishankarsubramanian9677
    @gourishankarsubramanian9677 5 років тому

    Very nicely explained Joe!

  • @DLX_Pilot
    @DLX_Pilot 7 років тому

    Excellent video Captain Joe!!

  • @DUIA77
    @DUIA77 7 років тому

    Thank you Capt Joe, I did see one aircraft landing at LAX with the RAT deployed.

  • @kadar51
    @kadar51 7 років тому

    This is one of your best videos IMHO!

  • @shrisai7646
    @shrisai7646 5 років тому

    Actually I alloted in brake shop so lack of line maintenance knowledge. Your all videos helped me lot for my Interview.
    Meet you soon on Field Captain

  • @philzambo
    @philzambo 7 років тому

    Brilliant stuff as ever Joe!!

  • @blueloop3155
    @blueloop3155 5 років тому

    I never seen that on a plane thank you buddy for making this video!!

  • @shawnpa
    @shawnpa 7 років тому

    I didn't know about this backup system. Nice video.

  • @1206dj
    @1206dj 7 років тому

    Can't wait to tell people there's a rat on the plane! Really enjoy your videos. Keep them coming.