Dornier Do X: Short documentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лип 2023
  • With its mammoth size and luxurious accommodations, the ambitious Dornier Do X flying boat awed the world in the 1920s/30s and paved the way for the future of air travel.
    #DornierDoX, #FlyingBoat, #Seaplane, #AviationHistory, #AircraftDesign, #1920s, #1930s, #DecoDesign, #ArtDeco, #LuxuryTravel, #FirstClassTravel, #AmbitiousEngineering, #BoundaryPushing, #AviationVisionary, #CommercialAviation, #LongDistanceTravel, #TransAtlanticTravel, #FlyingBoatEra, #GoldenAgeOfFlight, #InterwarInnovation, #PrewarInvention, #AirTravelRevolution, #AviationRevolution, #AircraftRevolution, #GameChanger, #IndustryChanger, #TravelGameChanger, #Luftwaffe, #ClaudiusDornier, #AviationPioneer, #AircraftDesigner, #FlyingBoatDesigner, #SeaplaneDesigner, #AeroEngineer, #AerospaceEngineer, # GermanEngineer, #GermanAircraft
    #GiantOfTheSkies, #CloudTitan, #SkyGiant, #JumboOfItsDay, #SuperSizedForItsTime, #MassiveWingspan, #WingspanOfaWHALE, #GiganticDimensions, #HugeFuselage, #CavernousCabin, #PalatialPlane, #AerialOceanLiner, #LinerOfTheClouds, #CruiserOfTheClouds, #FloatingHotel, #SkyHotel, #AerialLiner, #CloudClipper, #StratoClipper, #SpaceAgeTech, #RetroFuturistic, #VintageFuturistic, #OldSchoolAviation, #OIdSchoolAirTravel, #JetAgePredecessor
    #MaidenFlight, #FirstFlight, #TestFlight, #AviationMilestone, #DepartureFromConventional, #ThinkingBig, #FlyingLarge, #PushingTheLimits, #TechnicalTriumph, #GermanEngineering, #EngineeringMarvel, #MasterpieceOfDesign, #MeticulousPlanning, #PrecisionExecution, #DuraluminAirframe, #StateOfTheArtDesign, #UltraModernOfItsDay, #VisionToReality, #DreamToReality, #BlueSkyAmbition, #AudaciousIdea, #BigHairyAudaciousGoal, #BHAG, #ProofOfConcept, #DefyingExpectations, #SurpassingStandards
    #PromotionalTour, #AircraftDemonstration, #ShowcaseJourney, #WhirlwindTour, #GlobalVoyage, #ContinentHopping, #HemisphereHopping, #TransatlanticCrossing, #InternationalDebut, #NoticeMeWorld!, #LookAtMe!, #CantIgnoreMe, #EyesOnMe, #CloudCruiser, #AttentionSeeker, #Showstopper, #HeadTurner, #NeckCraner, #RubberNecker, #GawkAtMe, #CantMissMe, #ICommandYourAttention, #LOOKAndSee, #TakeItALLIn, #FeastYourEyes, #VisualDelight,
    #LogisticalChallenges, #DemandingMaintenance, #TemperamentalEngines, #EngineTroublesGalore, #MaintenanceNightmares, #HeftyOperatingCosts, #FuelGuzzler, #GasGuzzler, #HeavyOnTheJuice, #DrinksLikeAFish, #ExcessiveConsumption, #DemandingDivah, #AttentionSeeking, #MakingAStatement, #WakeUpCall, #CostOfAmbition, #NoPainNoGain, #GrowingPains, #TeethingTroubles, #EarlyDevelopmentIssues, #MaturingProcess, #TrialByFire, #BaptismByFire, #TrialAndError, #FailingForward, #FailFastForward, #LearnOrDie
    #OvertakenByProgress, #OutpacedByTechnology, #LeapfroggedByAdvances, #CostBenefitReality, #GroundedAmbitions, #ChangingTimes, #SignOfTheTimes, #ShapeShiftingScene, #NewKidOnTheBlock, #FlavorOfTheMonth, #FadFading, #NoveltyWearingOff, #ShinyNewToys, #BlindedByTheNew, #OutWithTheOldInWithTheNew, #CastAside, #ThrownOntheScrapheap, #VintageTech, #EverythingNewIsOldAgain, #ComebackStory, #FullCircleReturns, #WhatsOldIsNewAgain, #DornierDoX, #DornierFlyingBoat, #AviationHistory, #VintageAviation, #ClassicPlanes, #1920sTechnology, #InterwarEra, #BetweenTheWars, #EarlyCommercialAviation, #GoldenAgeOfFlight, #AmbitiousEngineering, #AviationVisionaries, #BigDreams, #PushingTheLimits, #TechnologicalFrontiers, #EngineeringFeats, #AviationFirsts, #RecordBreakingAircraft, #JumboJetPrototype, #LuxuryTravel, #LapOfLuxury, #OpulentStyle, #ArtDecoElegance, #LuxuryLinerOfTheSkies, #FlyingPalace, #TheQueensOfTheSky, #RulersOfTheSeas, #MightyMetalMonarchs, #MajesticFloatingGiants, #MammothOfTheSeas, #GracefulGoliaths, #GentleBehemoths
    #TwelveEngines, #EngineRedundancy, #AerialLiners, #SeaplaneGiants, #WhaleOfAPlane, #LeviathanOfTheSkies, #AerialOceanLiner, #TransAtlanticCrossing, #PacificCrossing, #LongDistanceTravel, #UltraLongHaul, #FlyingBoatHeyday, #WaterBird, #FloatPlane, #BigBird, #TheBigOne, #MassiveWingspan, #WingsLikeBattleships, #GiganticDimensions, #ColossalSize, #GargantuanAircraft, #MindBogglingSize, #UnfathomableScale, #SheerImmensity, #BiggerIsBetter, #Ginormous, #Humongous, #MonsterOfTheSkies, #Grandeur, #Supersize, #JawDropping
    #HubrisOfMan, #RidingHigh, #SoaringAmbition, #EyesOnThePrize, #Ultimate Goal, #ManWithVision, #OneManDream, #IndividualAmbition, #HeadInTheClouds, #BlueSkyThinking, #ImaginationUnbound, #NoIdeaTooBig, #SizeDoesMatter, #GoBigOrGoHome, #DreamToReality, #FantasyToFact, #VisionToFruition #IdealsToInvention, #ObsessionWithExcellence, #StrivingForPerfection, #AttentionToDetail, #QuestForQuality, #JourneyOfImagination, #TriumphOfWill, #StrengthOfSpirit, #TestamentToTenacity, #DefyingExpectations, #ConfoundingCritics, #HopeAgainstHope, #MarchToADifferentDrum, #OddManOut, #AgainstTheGrain

КОМЕНТАРІ • 138

  • @gerardmoran9560
    @gerardmoran9560 10 місяців тому +37

    We've come a long way. With a 110mph cruise speed and a range of just over 1,000 miles crossing the Atlantic was a chore! Dornier solved some comlpex engineering challenges. I love engineering but I do appreciate aesthetics. With its tongue depressor wings, ship bridge cockpit and crowded formation of piston engines the Do X looked like a mash-up of a tug boat, dump truck and an airplane. Eventually Dornier moved on to build some pretty good jets.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 10 місяців тому +3

      I think the first non stop transatlantic flight east-west was a Junkers W33 (also all metal) in 1928. It was a year after Lindbergh but in the more difficult direction. (due to prevailing winds).

    • @StephanBuchin
      @StephanBuchin 8 місяців тому +1

      🙂 Looks more like a flying boat.

    • @gerardmoran9560
      @gerardmoran9560 8 місяців тому +1

      @@StephanBuchin Indeed. That's what they called them.

    • @Zodroo_Tint
      @Zodroo_Tint 8 місяців тому +1

      Yes we come a long way, we using Metric now. :)

    • @philliprobinson7724
      @philliprobinson7724 6 місяців тому

      Hi Gerard. You summed it up in one expertly sprayed blast of verbal graffiti. "Tongue depressor wing" and "mash-up of tug-boat, dump truck, and airplane." summed up the plane perfectly. Loved it, I'm green with envy, especially as you balanced your succinct verbal vandalism with some faint praise for Dornier. Are you a senior journalist somewhere? Cheers, P.R.

  • @johnjephcote7636
    @johnjephcote7636 10 місяців тому +10

    In my (German) book on the DO-X, there is a photo of its wreckage in the Berlin aviation museum, following an Allied air raid.

  • @davidkalbacker6033
    @davidkalbacker6033 10 місяців тому +11

    Pan Am clippers were the peak or Zenith of flying boats. The Do was never commercially successful. That was not the case with American and British made flying boats.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 10 місяців тому +1

      There are nearly 10 years between the Do X first flight in July 1929 and the Boeing Model 314 "Clipper" in June 1938. The Germans were 10 year ahead in metal technology since Junkers had production metal aircraft in production in 1916 and Dornier had metal flying boats in 1918. British flying boats were only really successful because the British Government subsidized them extremely heavily to keep empire airways open to its colonies. It's not some technical achievement but one of just pumping Government money into orders. Had Germany maintained its colonies they would have done the same. They had some pretty nifty flying boats. Pan Am at least was run on a commercial basis.

  • @hertzair1186
    @hertzair1186 8 місяців тому +5

    You’re doing an excellent job. Your content and narration is among the best.

  • @EricCoop
    @EricCoop 10 місяців тому +10

    Great video! The Do-X first flew on 12 Bristol Jupiters and the engines were replaced with Curtiss Concuerers for the translant flight.

  • @unclenogbad1509
    @unclenogbad1509 8 місяців тому +8

    OK, I have a fondness for flying boats in particular, and wish that these majestic beasts were still around. Still, the DO-X (ten) was also such a massive leap forward in aircraft technology, you really have to take your hat off to Dornier just for producing it when they did. The fact that it performed speaks volumes, and the fact that it had flaws is unsurprising - but where it fell down, others were inspired to follow (and to push for better engines). Thanks for another top class doc.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      your enthusiasm for flying boats is infectious! The DO-X indeed represented a remarkable chapter in aviation history. Given your fondness, we’re curious, what would it be like if these majestic beasts were part of our modern world? Let’s imagine together-how would you envision a modern-day flying boat?

    • @unclenogbad1509
      @unclenogbad1509 7 місяців тому

      @@dontdeletehistory So long as you're not asking for cost effectiveness in modern air transit terms (not something I could really calculate), I'll have a think and get back to you.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      take your time sir! But I do think Flying Boats could make a come back today. @@unclenogbad1509

    • @unclenogbad1509
      @unclenogbad1509 6 місяців тому

      You've set me thinking here. Mostly about the general aesthetic appeal of flying boats - I think probably it's to do with the sleek lines combining aircraft utility with the romance of the sailing ship. All aircraft look at their best when flying, but can look pretty awkward and ungainly on the tarmac. Flying boats are able to retain their sky-bound elegance when Earth-bound, but afloat.
      They represent (for me, at least) the great romance of air travel. Sure, they were vehicles for the rich - with none of the 'steerage' passengers of the great ocean liners - but even now, they seem to represent something. When, for instance, did we stop referring to passenger planes as 'Airliners'.
      Though I still love these aesthetics in the smaller models, what I'm really thinking of is the big ones. Big is better, sorry. Size was the main advantage flying boats had over land-based aircraft, even after the expansion of airports and longer runways. Aside from its power plant, the (often overlooked) undercarriage is frequently the most complex, heavy and challenging parts of a land-based aircraft, having to support the whole thing squarely - a problem Flying Boats didn't have, the physics of buoyancy doing all the work. And with that hull, came the boon of space: space for cargo or for passengers' comfort (if they could afford it). The old flying boats were huge for their time, much larger than anything confined to mere land. I saw the Spruce Goose on a visit to Los Angeles in the 90's - it's often derided as a folly, but I disagree. At the time it was designed, the submarine war in the Atlantic was at its height, losses by the Merchant Marine were horrendous, so the idea of sending heavy cargo and troops over by air was practical, and the thing would have worked, by golly. All right, once it actually flew, it was obsolete, the submarine threat having receded, but it's still, on its own terms, a good idea and a beautiful aircraft.
      So, I'm looking at something big. Passengers, cargo, comfort, all together in one package; not crammed into minimal space as in a modern 'passenger jet'. Away with utility, back to the romance. Modern materials can fashion a stronger, lighter, more practical fuselage and wings. As for power plant; piston engines fall short on performance, jet engines are too brutal (take-off from water needs something smoother) so I'd go for turbo-props. The lines, though, the old aesthetics, they need to carry on. I'd look for something that would make Caprioni gasp in wonder, while feeling a certain internal satisfaction in knowing that he laid its foundations, at least.
      I'm British, I live on a Island, so having to go to a Port and take a ferry overseas to another country is natural to me - it's what we do if we can't afford an air ticket, or if we're taking a car with us. So going to a port, a harbour, and boarding a mighty beast of the air is only a slight step up in fantasy. I don't care about speed (the old air cruisers were never that fast) but let me stand in an open viewport deck and watch the waves pass under our hull, and I'd feel thrilled and happy.
      Screw the economics, I've been on plenty of 'planes, I want to TRAVEL!

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  6 місяців тому +1

      @@unclenogbad1509 btw I’m speechless 🙌🏼🙌🏼, Your reflections on flying boats really strike a chord with aviation enthusiasts who cherish the history and romance of early air travel. The blending of utility and elegance in designs like the Spruce Goose represents an era where the journey was as celebrated as the destination. Even today, the allure of these graceful giants of the sky remains, evoking nostalgia for the days when air travel was a grand adventure. And you’re spot on about the engineering marvels of these aircraft, designed to overcome the limitations of early aviation infrastructure. It’s remarkable how these aircraft combined the practicalities of transportation with the splendor of exploration. Their legacy is a testament to the boundless ingenuity of that era, and I thank you for sharing such a passionate and insightful comment. It’s always a joy to connect with someone who shares a deep appreciation for the golden age of aviation.

  • @williamzk9083
    @williamzk9083 10 місяців тому +8

    Claudius Dornier had worked for a time for Count Zeppelin and developed a understanding of aluminum structures from the skeletons used for Zeppelins. This lead to all Aluminum flying boats by 1918-1919. Junkers also had metal aircraft in production by 1916. (First having flown one in 1911). Had Germany not be restricted by the Treaty of Versailles (which forbade engines greater than 100hp) and various trade blocks the History of commercial aviation might have advanced much faster.

  • @paulazemeckis7835
    @paulazemeckis7835 8 місяців тому +1

    Would have loved to travel in it back in the day. Loved the vid's music throwback to the 80's.

  • @williampage622
    @williampage622 10 місяців тому +17

    The plane was not a Doo Ex, it was a D O 10 (X Latin number ten) the The DO for Dornier.

    • @MyBlueZed
      @MyBlueZed 9 місяців тому +6

      The chairman of the restoration project definitely called it the DOO EX … although with a German accent.

    • @Pijawek
      @Pijawek 6 місяців тому +1

      It wasn't. Dornier called it's projects with letters. Before it he desigbed Do. U and Do. Y after it.

  • @ichigobx3912
    @ichigobx3912 9 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for your video on dornier do x😊
    I've just fallen in love with this MSFS2020 hydroplane and your doc helps me understand it better.

  • @StephanBuchin
    @StephanBuchin 8 місяців тому +3

    Very interesting video, perfectly edited and narrated 🙂

  • @SSmith-fm9kg
    @SSmith-fm9kg 8 місяців тому

    Incredible machine. Thanks for the video.

  • @ivanhicks887
    @ivanhicks887 10 місяців тому +1

    Wonderful Video - Thankyou - A great Job

  • @kier4931
    @kier4931 8 місяців тому

    Great documentary. Stay the course!

  • @deaterk
    @deaterk 8 місяців тому +2

    Very good video. Exceptional narration. You are a treat to listen to sir.

  • @Drod6969
    @Drod6969 5 місяців тому

    Amazing voice bro! Love your enunciation

  • @lucasdeaver9192
    @lucasdeaver9192 9 місяців тому +5

    Well sorry but too early to be the "zenith of flying boat design". That would be the Saunders Roe Princess. The last purpose built passenger flying boat and the most luxurious. But ultimately a failure.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      The Saunders Roe Princess indeed was a pinnacle of flying boat design, @lucasdeaver9192. Such ambitious designs inspire us to dream about the heights of luxury and innovation in aviation. If you could design your own ‘ultimate’ aircraft, what features would you include to make it both luxurious and successful?

  • @Arp1757
    @Arp1757 3 місяці тому

    The color film looks like it was filmed yesterday. Fantastic!
    Where did you find it? (Or is a Do X back from the grave and flying around somewhere?)

  • @neilbedford5082
    @neilbedford5082 8 місяців тому

    Great video - a really good job.

  • @georgelolenici6023
    @georgelolenici6023 9 місяців тому

    Well done keep up the nice work .balanced info and emphasis on value of the innovation and desire to improve

  • @davidgenie-ci5zl
    @davidgenie-ci5zl 10 місяців тому +8

    It is pronounced Dee Oh X, not Dew X.
    Other than that, very nice video

  • @spybaz
    @spybaz 9 місяців тому +3

    Just grabbed this plane for MSFS 2020 :)

  • @ronaldmarcks1842
    @ronaldmarcks1842 10 місяців тому +2

    Wow. I can scarcely fit into an airplane seat now and I'm not fat. Such regression.

  • @pattywolford
    @pattywolford 8 місяців тому +1

    Fascinating

  • @auntbarbara5576
    @auntbarbara5576 10 місяців тому

    Thank you!

  • @williamcaton8432
    @williamcaton8432 8 місяців тому

    Great video! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

  • @geoffk777
    @geoffk777 8 місяців тому +3

    The DO-X was ver impressive, but was underpowered. It could barely gain altitude and was quite slow and inefficient. Just a few years later. much improved Boeing 314 Clipper flying boats were carrying passengers around the Globe--to East Asia and Europe, among other places. The shift to land planes was a post-war change, but the DO-X was still not the Apex of flying boats. The Boeing 314 and Martin flying boats were farr superior.
    Still a very impressie acheivement for the time, though. The floatation sponsons were very innovative.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      you’re correct in observing the Dornier Do X’s limitations, which were indeed notable despite its impressive size and ambition. It was a remarkable technical achievement for its era, but it faced significant challenges in performance.

  • @tomallen5837
    @tomallen5837 8 місяців тому +3

    I haven't watched a video in a long time (other than politics) wherein the comments section is just as exciting as this well-documented and a well-spoken voice over (kudos to you, whoever you are) in a very long time. Congrats to all commenters as well. I did have a few more questions, and all you guys and dolls 😂 nailed them meticulously!

  • @MarkkuKoljonenwTinja
    @MarkkuKoljonenwTinja 8 місяців тому

    Thanks! :D

  • @IslandInsanity
    @IslandInsanity 9 місяців тому +1

    Great video! I saw this aircraft in a book and almost fell out of my chair. 😂

  • @philliprobinson7724
    @philliprobinson7724 10 місяців тому +4

    Hi. It's amazing that such a large aircraft with such a small vertical fin and rudder, and tailplane, could fly safely at all. Equally amazing is that a wing carrying enough drag inducing scaffolding to support 12 engines on its upper lift producing surface, could get off the water at all.
    "Zenith" of flying boat design? Nadir more likely! The Short Sunderland and its offshoots would take the title "Zenith" from the DOX if it wasn't for the utterly excellent Consolidated PBY Catalina. The PBY was an outstanding performer and the most mass-produced flying boat, 3276 in all. Zenith indeed! When money has been put where the mouth is, we must accept that judgment as final. Thanks for the video, and Cheers anyway. P.R.

    • @philliprobinson7724
      @philliprobinson7724 6 місяців тому

      Hi. Getting a "heart" for posting a negative comment proves pigs might fly. Cheers, P.R.

  • @kitbaker8521
    @kitbaker8521 10 місяців тому +2

    110 miles an hour…near under 100 knots…was a tough sell when the ocean liners of the day were moving close to 30 miles an hour in a lot more comfortable surroundings. Nice effort but a lot of work was needed.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 10 місяців тому +2

      I suspect had it of gotten the more powerful engines it needed it might have been a bit faster, say 120mph. Thus we'd have a 44 hour transatlantic crossing Berlin to New York and maybe 36 Ireland to New York or Newfoundland. So about 1.5-2 days days. What would a ship take? 4.5-5 days? It would earn a lot of money just carrying mail and ofcourse there would also be a few wealthy people, diplomats, business people.

  • @kaykiekid
    @kaykiekid 9 місяців тому

    Wow! Wow! What a beautiful giant bird she is! 😄👍❤️💕💘💖💯

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому +1

      Imagine if you could travel anywhere in this ‘beautiful giant bird’, where would you take her and what modern innovations would you want on board?

  • @Steve-ou8nw
    @Steve-ou8nw 7 місяців тому

    @1:00 you can see the radial engines it was first equipped with. They weren't powerful enough and were changed out for more powerful in-line
    engines. Also the front and rear props counter-rotated.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      The radial engines originally installed in the Dornier Do X were indeed underpowered for such a large aircraft, which was one of the largest and most powerful flying boats of its time. The switch to more powerful inline engines would have been a necessary modification to improve its performance. Counter-rotating propellers are a design feature that mitigates the issue of torque and P-factor, which can cause handling difficulties. This design choice in the Do X's engineering underscores the meticulous attention to detail necessary to manage the flight characteristics of such a substantial aircraft.

  • @williamzk9083
    @williamzk9083 10 місяців тому +2

    Dude, is that your own voice? It's excellent.

  • @johnsmith100
    @johnsmith100 9 місяців тому +1

    Good narration ! Finally …

  • @rogerpritchard
    @rogerpritchard 7 місяців тому

    Greet video

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Thanks for the kind words! It's always great to hear when someone appreciates the effort put into creating a video.

  • @dereklwashington1132
    @dereklwashington1132 7 місяців тому

    Consider this. The airplane was literally INVENTED just a few years before this plane went on a worldwide tour! Freaking amazing.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      The sense of wonder that comes from realizing the rapid progression from invention to global deployment is indeed amazing. It highlights human ingenuity and the relentless pursuit of pushing boundaries. Your enthusiasm for this incredible feat is infectious.

  • @geraldwagner8739
    @geraldwagner8739 7 місяців тому

    It was the only aircraft in these years that could compete with Zeppelins on trans Atlantic flights.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      The competition between different modes of transatlantic travel in the early 20th century was indeed fierce. Aircraft like the Dornier Do X represented significant strides in aviation, challenging the dominance of airships with the promise of faster and more efficient travel.

  • @cesarefiderio1634
    @cesarefiderio1634 7 місяців тому

    Bellissime macchine volanti.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Indeed, the engineering marvels of aviation inspire awe. Italian translates to 'Beautiful flying machines,' and it perfectly encapsulates the wonder that these aircraft evoke, each a testament to human ingenuity and the pursuit of pushing beyond our limits

  • @Franklin-pc3xd
    @Franklin-pc3xd 8 місяців тому +1

    Got news: 1924 is hardly the "dawn" of the twentieth century. Perhaps mid or late morning, but not the dawn. The dawn would have been

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      A sharp observation, @Franklin-pc3xd Your comment highlights the subjective nature of historical timelines.

  • @richardcleveland8549
    @richardcleveland8549 8 місяців тому

    This reminds me of the plane that carries Harpo and Chico into New York when they're impersonating Russian fliers!

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Your comment seems to reference a comedic scene, likely appreciating the role of aircraft in popular culture. It’s a good reminder of how aviation has a place not just in transportation but also in entertainment and collective memory.

  • @jimmyguitar2933
    @jimmyguitar2933 8 місяців тому

    Crazy how fast aviation progressed from Kitty Hawk in 1910 to something like this 20 years later. Beat that, Elon!

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      It's quite the jet-propelled journey from the Wright brothers to these giants of the sky. Elon's got his work cut out for him, but then again, he's not one to shy away from a stratospheric challenge!

  • @FahlbeckIII
    @FahlbeckIII 10 місяців тому

    👍😎👍

  • @rachaeligbinoba9743
    @rachaeligbinoba9743 10 місяців тому

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @eddiekulp1241
    @eddiekulp1241 9 місяців тому

    The cumbersome way engines were controlled made it dangerous in rough weather .

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Indeed, @eddiekulp1241, the Dornier Do X was a leviathan of its time, pushing the envelope of engineering prowess.

  • @Alex-jr8uf
    @Alex-jr8uf Місяць тому

    Even by the replies to the comments the narration makes this so obvious it’s all AI run

  • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
    @ngauruhoezodiac3143 9 місяців тому +1

    It was an expensive machine back in the day. Aircraft evolution happened so fast that it can't have had a long service life. I wonder if it made a profit.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      zephyr, you’ve touched on the rapid pace of aviation development. It’s thought-provoking to consider the ‘what-ifs’ of aviation history. What if the Do X had a longer service life?

  • @FrankTedesco
    @FrankTedesco 8 місяців тому

    So,what do YOU think?? Same narrator as Timeline???

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Whether they're the same from Timeline is left to the discerning ear of the listener!

  • @spaceman081447
    @spaceman081447 8 місяців тому

    @Osaruguexyzz
    Could you do a video on the Yankee Clipper seaplanes flown by Pan Am?

  • @hiha2108
    @hiha2108 2 місяці тому

    To all "specialists": It's pronounced "Doh ex", and the X hast nothing to do with the roman "ten". Listen to the german original text: ua-cam.com/video/v2aaXfqxFrQ/v-deo.htmlsi=doP397325skLWd3A

  • @jasonthamos69
    @jasonthamos69 7 місяців тому

    Please do not only use the metric system for size

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Your request for the inclusion of different measurement systems is a good point. It's a reminder of the diverse global audience engaging with the content and the need to be inclusive in communicating information, ensuring it is accessible to everyone, regardless of the measurement system they are accustomed to using.

  • @metrotek5
    @metrotek5 9 місяців тому +1

    Wouldn't it be pronounced 'Dough' ? ... I may be wrong, just a thought

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      You’re quite right, @metrotek5 pronunciation can be a tricky aspect of aviation history.

  • @JTA1961
    @JTA1961 8 місяців тому

    I'm not sure if it's appropriate to call an aircraft "groundbreaking"... sounds like testing fate...

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Your hesitation about labeling an aircraft as "groundbreaking" is a reminder that the language used in documentaries carries weight and influences perception. While "groundbreaking" is often used to denote significant advancements, it's also crucial to remain mindful and respectful of the risks and challenges inherent in aviation history.

  • @karlbark
    @karlbark 8 місяців тому

    What in the world do you think Do-X stands for ??
    It is "Dornier" ... and X meand 10 in latin.
    Your pronounciation of Dooe-X, leads me to believe that the name of the plane (& the plane's builder), might be "Dooer-nier" or smth'n such 😅
    -Come on...a little better research, please.
    -Other than that:
    Good effort. I love to see these firsts in long-distance travel !
    🇮🇸

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому +1

      You've raised an important point about accuracy in documentary narration. Do-X indeed stands for Dornier X, with "X" representing the Roman numeral for ten. Accurate pronunciation and factual detail are crucial for credibility. Your feedback is a valuable reminder of the importance of research in documentary production.

  • @7MPhonemicEnglish
    @7MPhonemicEnglish 9 місяців тому +3

    When you had to be filthy rich to fly and every flight provided a 50% chance of certain death, in other words, "the good ole days".

    • @thetooginator153
      @thetooginator153 8 місяців тому +1

      Well, the filthy rich can now go into space (depending on one’s definition of “space”), which is pretty darn risky. Also, the ascent on Mt. Everest is actually crowded during the climbing season, with a one-in-ten chance of dying in the attempt. Not to mention frostbite and other issues.
      Oh, you might want to change “a 50% chance of certain death” and delete the word “certain”. I’m sure you see why when looking at it again.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      you’ve painted quite the picture of the early days of aviation! The thrill and exclusivity of those early flights are part of what made the era so romanticized.

  • @Modeltnick
    @Modeltnick 8 місяців тому +1

    It’s pronounced “dee oh ex”.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому +1

      Thank you

    • @hiha2108
      @hiha2108 2 місяці тому

      No, as a german who worked for Dornier in the 80ies, I can say it's pronounced "Doh ex"

  • @davidpfister5138
    @davidpfister5138 8 місяців тому

    Why cannot we have a human narrator?

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      We'll consider this feedback for future content.

  • @XselfwillrunriotX
    @XselfwillrunriotX 8 місяців тому

    Hmmm. I wonder if anything was “unconventional “? 😅

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      It’s exciting to hear about the restoration of the Kellett XR-8. As an experimental aircraft that didn’t quite reach operational status, it represents the innovative spirit of aviation history. Its display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force will be a wonderful opportunity for enthusiasts and historians alike to appreciate the technological advances of that era. Thank you for sharing this update!

  • @davidgenie-ci5zl
    @davidgenie-ci5zl 10 місяців тому

    I think the zenith of flying boats is with the Martin Mars for utility , for of size the Spruce Goose, for of speed the Sea Master. For contemporary craft the Shin Maiwa US-2

  • @marvindebot3264
    @marvindebot3264 10 місяців тому +6

    What's this "doo Ex" BS? It's dee oh ten, Dornier Ten

  • @rrich52806
    @rrich52806 8 місяців тому

    DONNER PARTY

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Thankfully, the only thing we're serving on these flights is knowledge-no forks or knives needed!

  • @garryferrington811
    @garryferrington811 8 місяців тому

    Boy, I hate colorization. Hate, hate, hate.
    Nice video, though.

  • @elliottswanson9307
    @elliottswanson9307 8 місяців тому

    Blah, blah blah...

    • @deaterk
      @deaterk 8 місяців тому +2

      Elliot - Your comment reveals your level of intellect. Watch something else if you’re not interested in aviation history troll.

    • @dontdeletehistory
      @dontdeletehistory  7 місяців тому

      Welp? I guess we must turn the T.v off now.

  • @rachaeligbinoba9743
    @rachaeligbinoba9743 10 місяців тому +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤