I'm a former pianist and till now didn't know op.32 very well. I believe it's played more rarely, than 23. Anyway always great to make new discoveries even though Rakh is kinda one , you think you know really well.
38 here. Out of those, I have 25 years listening to them. And just TODAY I felt their full force. I just wonder what kind of accursed piano is this man using?
Ich finde diese Interpretation absolut hervorragend! Makellose Technik, klangliche Phantasie usw. Dieser junge Pianist reiht sich schon jetzt in die Schar der großen russischen Virtuosen ein!
Here are the Preludes in key order: 35:58 - C Major 55:28 - A Minor 48:33 - G Major 42:56 - E Minor 13:35 - D Major 1:00:14 - B Minor 57:16 - A Major 3:48 - F-sharp Minor 40:18 - E Major 0:00 - C-sharp Minor 1:05:38 - B Major 1:07:57 - G-sharp Minor 32:26 - G-flat Major 30:34 - E-flat Minor 1:10:25 - D-flat Major 37:12 - B-flat Minor 27:04 - A-flat Major 51:54 - F Minor 21:53 - E-flat Major 24:31 - C Minor 6:48 - B-flat Major 18:07 - G Minor 53:11 - F Major 10:22 - D Minor Note: I know most people aren't interested in this, but I put them in "key order" because I think it would be nice.
MATTHEW, IN RACHMANINOFF THERE IS NO REASON FOR AN "ORDER". BACH, COUPERIN, CHOPIN, HAD TONAL ORDERS BUT RACHMANINOFF IS ALL OVER THE PLACE WITH MODULATIONS AND TONAL MOVEMENT THAT AN ORDER DOES NOT APPLY. NOR DOES THE WORD PRELUDE APPLY AS THESE WORKS ARE NOT THE PRELUDE TO ANYTHING.
@@ronwalker4849 would be great if you had found your caps lock button. And tonal movement is just normal for a piece and nothing unique for Rachmaninoff
@@somebody9033 Yeah it is isn't it, personally I find Rach's preludes the most interesting in terms of their order. He wrote the first when he was quite young, but apparently decided on following the 'prelude in each key' idea later on as he composed more of them. This is in stark contrast to, for example, Bach and Chopin, who set out to write a prelude in each key from the very start.
I greatly appreciate that care was taken to place the commercials between the selections. this had to have been done by someone who cares about the music.
I believe the final prelude, in D-flat major, is one of the most profound pieces Rachmaninoff ever wrote. Like Medtner's Sonata Reminiscenza, it is simply inexpressibly beautiful.
This is my favourite interpretation, he's the only pianist that manage to maintain the melodic structure in a way that makes it easy to follow/understand, with other interpretations, i'm always lost into the complexity. I particularly love his interpretation of opus 32 no.4
Op. 32 no. 4 is probably the most difficult of the 24, and I have played them all. The problem here is that the tempo builds to near the end, and if you start too fast, it is nearly impossible (and unmusical) to build to the "as fast as possible" without slowing down, as is the case here. It works okay, but does not follow the composer's intent. I have other issues, but , each to his own. Check out my imperfect version on UA-cam.
Sergei Rachmaninoff: Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3 00:00:00 Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3: No. 2. Prelude in C-Sharp Minor Sergei Rachmaninoff: 10 Preludes, Op. 23 00:03:48 No. 1 in F-Sharp Minor: Largo 00:06:48 No. 2 in B-Flat Major: Maestoso 00:10:22 No. 3 in D Minor: Tempo di minuetto 00:13:35 No. 4 in D Major: Andante cantabile 00:18:07 No. 5 in G Minor: Alla marcia 00:21:53 No. 6 in E-Flat Major: Andante 00:24:31 No. 7 in C Minor: Allegro 00:27:04 No. 8 in A-Flat Major: Allegro vivace 00:30:34 No. 9 in E-Flat Minor: Presto 00:32:26 No. 10 in G-Flat Major: Largo Sergei Rachmaninoff: 13 Preludes, Op. 32 00:35:58 No. 1 in C Major: Allegro vivace 00:37:12 No. 2 in B-Flat Minor: Allegretto 00:40:18 No. 3 in E Major: Allegro vivace 00:42:56 No. 4 in E Minor: Allegro con brio 00:48:33 No. 5 in G Major: Moderato 00:51:54 No. 6 in F Minor: Allegro appassionato 00:53:11 No. 7 in F Major: Moderato 00:55:28 No. 8 in A Minor: Vivo 00:57:16 No. 9 in A Major: Allegro moderato 01:00:14 No. 10 in B Minor: Lento 01:05:38 No. 11 in B Major: Allegretto 01:07:57 No. 12 in G-Sharp Minor: Allegro 01:10:25 No. 13 in D-Flat Major: Grave - Allegro
Tracklist originally provided by Vex V. I just rearranged it for easy reading. Sergei Rachmaninoff: Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3 00:00:00 Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3: No. 2. Prelude in C-Sharp Minor Sergei Rachmaninoff: 10 Preludes, Op. 23 00:00:48 No. 1 in F-Sharp Minor: Largo 00:06:48 No. 2 in B-Flat Major: Maestoso 00:10:22 No. 3 in D Minor: Tempo di minuetto 00:13:35 No. 4 in D Major: Andante cantabile 00:18:07 No. 5 in G Minor: Alla marcia 00:21:53 No. 6 in E-Flat Major: Andante 00:24:31 No. 7 in C Minor: Allegro 00:27:04 No. 8 in A-Flat Major: Allegro vivace 00:30:34 No. 9 in E-Flat Minor: Presto 00:32:26 No. 10 in G-Flat Major: Largo Sergei Rachmaninoff: 13 Preludes, Op. 32 00:35:58 No. 1 in C Major: Allegro vivace 00:37:12 No. 2 in B-Flat Minor: Allegretto 00:40:18 No. 3 in E Major: Allegro vivace 00:42:56 No. 4 in E Minor: Allegro con brio 00:48:33 No. 5 in G Major: Moderato 00:51:54 No. 6 in F Minor: Allegro appassionato 00:53:11 No. 7 in F Major: Moderato 00:55:28 No. 8 in A Minor: Vivo 00:57:16 No. 9 in A Major: Allegro moderato 01:00:14 No. 10 in B Minor: Lento 01:05:38 No. 11 in B Major: Allegretto 01:07:57 No. 12 in G-Sharp Minor: Allegro 01:10:25 No. 13 in D-Flat Major: Grave - Allegro
They're all inspired and lovely, but the voicing and inflection are exquisite in both the Op. 23 No. 4 in D and the Op. 23 No.6 in E-Flat! A master and a virtuoso! Ačiū tau, Lukas!
9:32 Art Tatum looking at Rachmaninoff doing the circle of fifths in one measure, then finishing up with a bunch of light speed runs and giving him the head nod of approval
Really very nice execution of the number 2, op. 23, B- Flat Major, it reminds me the version played by Richter and the middle part is even more musical
Opus 32, No. 3 in E Major- the best tempo for this M.M.55; These creative works are so in consonance with the tonality of the times, many would not want to hear any music more than this! Part of the tonal awareness was of war, of course; at the other end of the scale opposite of senseless violence, rapacity and death are the great creative musicians. After-effect of war, triumph of the deserving party. 55- the numerology suggests Prudence; also, Broadview. The entire Dayside self tonality can be flooded with awareness. Opus 32, No. 9 in A Major- Noble and Great souls, this probably isn't the same as Mahatmas, eastern- best tempo, M.M. 52- the number suggests Prudence, Unaffectedness or Detachment, Vairag; Development...
Why does the first one cut off before the end?? It kinda ruins the whole thing... I finally bought all of his preludes as sheet music, and wow are they complex. Even if you forget about the technical difficulties, I think it takes a long time to really understand how to feel these pieces when you play them.
Why is the last prelude, Op. 32, No. 13, so loud and fast? No attempt to bring out the inner voices, which Rachmaninoff clearly marks with accents, no phrasing of two note slurs. At the end, all the chords are equally loud. I'm not denying this young man's immense talent, but he has a ways to go in the matter of maturity yet.
Alexis Weissenberg also played the no 13 with some pep. Why do some many Askenkenazy et al assume this is a plodding funeral dirge? ie Occam’s Razor dictates it’s because they don’t have the chops so they assume a practice tempo. I can’t understand how you think this here is too fast...he takes a perfect middle ground tempo. Great stuff. Oh btw Slow and Boring does NOT automatically EQUAL maturity/profundity.
It's loud and fast, but that's an interpretive choice, and perfectly in the realm of great interpretation, at least for me. Maybe this is a particularly appropriate interpretation for the final prelude after you've just played all of them live!
Im 36, and for the first time in my life, i finally l understand those preludes, what a marvel ! Its never too late i guess
I'm a former pianist and till now didn't know op.32 very well. I believe it's played more rarely, than 23. Anyway always great to make new discoveries even though Rakh is kinda one , you think you know really well.
38 here. Out of those, I have 25 years listening to them. And just TODAY I felt their full force. I just wonder what kind of accursed piano is this man using?
Ich finde diese Interpretation absolut hervorragend! Makellose Technik, klangliche Phantasie usw. Dieser junge Pianist reiht sich schon jetzt in die Schar der großen russischen Virtuosen ein!
ich finds es nicht so gut
Der Tone ist zu hart und einbisschen künstlich..
Here are the Preludes in key order:
35:58 - C Major
55:28 - A Minor
48:33 - G Major
42:56 - E Minor
13:35 - D Major
1:00:14 - B Minor
57:16 - A Major
3:48 - F-sharp Minor
40:18 - E Major
0:00 - C-sharp Minor
1:05:38 - B Major
1:07:57 - G-sharp Minor
32:26 - G-flat Major
30:34 - E-flat Minor
1:10:25 - D-flat Major
37:12 - B-flat Minor
27:04 - A-flat Major
51:54 - F Minor
21:53 - E-flat Major
24:31 - C Minor
6:48 - B-flat Major
18:07 - G Minor
53:11 - F Major
10:22 - D Minor
Note: I know most people aren't interested in this, but I put them in "key order" because I think it would be nice.
MATTHEW, IN RACHMANINOFF THERE IS NO REASON FOR AN "ORDER". BACH, COUPERIN, CHOPIN, HAD TONAL ORDERS BUT RACHMANINOFF IS ALL OVER THE PLACE WITH MODULATIONS AND TONAL MOVEMENT THAT AN ORDER DOES NOT APPLY. NOR DOES THE WORD PRELUDE APPLY AS THESE WORKS ARE NOT THE PRELUDE TO ANYTHING.
@@ronwalker4849 would be great if you had found your caps lock button. And tonal movement is just normal for a piece and nothing unique for Rachmaninoff
How interesting he wrong a prelude in every key.
@@somebody9033 Yeah it is isn't it, personally I find Rach's preludes the most interesting in terms of their order. He wrote the first when he was quite young, but apparently decided on following the 'prelude in each key' idea later on as he composed more of them. This is in stark contrast to, for example, Bach and Chopin, who set out to write a prelude in each key from the very start.
I find it very interesting. Fans of classical music will never miss an opportunity to show you how clever they are..
Mature, respectful, aristocratic, thoughtful - bravissimo !
I greatly appreciate that care was taken to place the commercials between the selections. this had to have been done by someone who cares about the music.
that is nice of them. i totally had forgotten youtube still uses ads after using ublock and ogyoutube for so long
brilliant sarcasm
on the other hand it's nice to know Rachmaninov is worth being heavily monitized :)
Put AdblockPlus on your computer. It's free. No more commercials, ever. Designed by an engineer who got sick of commercials.
WHAT commercials? have you heard about *blocking* commercials? (Of course not: you must be a musician :)).
I believe the final prelude, in D-flat major, is one of the most profound pieces Rachmaninoff ever wrote. Like Medtner's Sonata Reminiscenza, it is simply inexpressibly beautiful.
This is an extraordinary rendition. The pianist's virtuosity does not swallow the poetry of his playing. Thanks for posting this jewel.
Чувствуется " русская, советская школа". Вам есть кого благодарить. Задорно, молодо, ярко- очень радостно Вас слушать, успехов и побед!
Школа - это такая вещь, которой на самом деле не существует. Нельзя научить играть Рахманинова, можно только научиться.
I am not Roosian. Listen to me! Paul Van Ness's Piano World! I like mine even better! 😊
Lukas sei un grande pianista !!!!!!! grazie di esistere !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
아름다운 피아노 연주곡 잘 들었습니다~감사합니다~🎵🎹🌿🍀☘🌹🌹☘🍀🌿❤❤
This is my favourite interpretation, he's the only pianist that manage to maintain the melodic structure in a way that makes it easy to follow/understand, with other interpretations, i'm always lost into the complexity. I particularly love his interpretation of opus 32 no.4
Op. 32 no. 4 is probably the most difficult of the 24, and I have played them all.
The problem here is that the tempo builds to near the end, and if you start too fast, it is nearly impossible (and unmusical) to build to the "as fast as possible" without slowing down, as is the case here. It works okay, but does not follow the composer's intent. I have other issues, but , each to his own.
Check out my imperfect version on UA-cam.
Sergei Rachmaninoff: Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3 00:00:00 Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3: No. 2. Prelude in C-Sharp Minor Sergei Rachmaninoff: 10 Preludes, Op. 23 00:03:48 No. 1 in F-Sharp Minor: Largo 00:06:48 No. 2 in B-Flat Major: Maestoso 00:10:22 No. 3 in D Minor: Tempo di minuetto 00:13:35 No. 4 in D Major: Andante cantabile 00:18:07 No. 5 in G Minor: Alla marcia 00:21:53 No. 6 in E-Flat Major: Andante 00:24:31 No. 7 in C Minor: Allegro 00:27:04 No. 8 in A-Flat Major: Allegro vivace 00:30:34 No. 9 in E-Flat Minor: Presto 00:32:26 No. 10 in G-Flat Major: Largo Sergei Rachmaninoff: 13 Preludes, Op. 32 00:35:58 No. 1 in C Major: Allegro vivace 00:37:12 No. 2 in B-Flat Minor: Allegretto 00:40:18 No. 3 in E Major: Allegro vivace 00:42:56 No. 4 in E Minor: Allegro con brio 00:48:33 No. 5 in G Major: Moderato 00:51:54 No. 6 in F Minor: Allegro appassionato 00:53:11 No. 7 in F Major: Moderato 00:55:28 No. 8 in A Minor: Vivo 00:57:16 No. 9 in A Major: Allegro moderato 01:00:14 No. 10 in B Minor: Lento 01:05:38 No. 11 in B Major: Allegretto 01:07:57 No. 12 in G-Sharp Minor: Allegro 01:10:25 No. 13 in D-Flat Major: Grave - Allegro
How pianists can play such complex pieces from memory astounds me.
One of the most beautiful renditions especially no 13 in D Flat Major
I agree. Incredible for a live performance!
I agree. No 13 is a towering and commanding finale to what is a hugely impressive performance of the Rachmaninov Preludes.
Masterful!
Such plastic rhythm, but not indulgent.
Marvelous.
thank s so much for the wonderfull free music. what a blessing to listen to yu, so accomplished, and generrous, and i bet you love what you do🎶🎶🎹🎹💖💖
Beautiful! Thank you for sharing!
Tracklist originally provided by Vex V. I just rearranged it for easy reading.
Sergei Rachmaninoff: Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3
00:00:00 Morceaux de fantaisie, Op. 3: No. 2. Prelude in C-Sharp Minor
Sergei Rachmaninoff: 10 Preludes, Op. 23
00:00:48 No. 1 in F-Sharp Minor: Largo
00:06:48 No. 2 in B-Flat Major: Maestoso
00:10:22 No. 3 in D Minor: Tempo di minuetto
00:13:35 No. 4 in D Major: Andante cantabile
00:18:07 No. 5 in G Minor: Alla marcia
00:21:53 No. 6 in E-Flat Major: Andante
00:24:31 No. 7 in C Minor: Allegro
00:27:04 No. 8 in A-Flat Major: Allegro vivace
00:30:34 No. 9 in E-Flat Minor: Presto
00:32:26 No. 10 in G-Flat Major: Largo
Sergei Rachmaninoff: 13 Preludes, Op. 32
00:35:58 No. 1 in C Major: Allegro vivace
00:37:12 No. 2 in B-Flat Minor: Allegretto
00:40:18 No. 3 in E Major: Allegro vivace
00:42:56 No. 4 in E Minor: Allegro con brio
00:48:33 No. 5 in G Major: Moderato
00:51:54 No. 6 in F Minor: Allegro appassionato
00:53:11 No. 7 in F Major: Moderato
00:55:28 No. 8 in A Minor: Vivo
00:57:16 No. 9 in A Major: Allegro moderato
01:00:14 No. 10 in B Minor: Lento
01:05:38 No. 11 in B Major: Allegretto
01:07:57 No. 12 in G-Sharp Minor: Allegro
01:10:25 No. 13 in D-Flat Major: Grave - Allegro
You get a like from me for your honesty!!
Bravo p.Lukai.Puiki ekspresija,suvaldyta emocija,tobula technika.Tik nesupratau 1o prel. pabaigos.
They're all inspired and lovely, but the voicing and inflection are exquisite in both the Op. 23 No. 4 in D and the Op. 23 No.6 in E-Flat! A master and a virtuoso! Ačiū tau, Lukas!
I like mine as much! 😊
Op 32 are especially amazing. There is definitely something special about a live recording by a pianist of this caliber. Thank you for this post.
I only hear audience at the end. I think it is actually not "live"
Incredible mastery! Bravo!!!
Supremely beautifully played
Молодец!
9:32 Art Tatum looking at Rachmaninoff doing the circle of fifths in one measure, then finishing up with a bunch of light speed runs and giving him the head nod of approval
Art Tatum was blind, but point taken
Really very nice execution of the number 2, op. 23, B- Flat Major, it reminds me the version played by Richter and the middle part is even more musical
Clean water at full speed. Brilliant
Actually this is not a compliment for the interpreter.
@@ediccartman7252 I play some of them, believe me, it is
No. 4 in d major pulls at the heart strings -similar in approach as Ashkenazy's beautifully calm and touching interpretation 💓
THE GENIUS!!!
Lukas -- Genius
потрясающе!!!
Really TOP pianist and musician!
Прекрасное исполнение чудесного произведения великого РАХМАНИНОВА! Но ещё полнее было бы восприятие при видео-трансляции!
@@kvvkvk ничего особенного - это просто хорошо. Культурный шок -это интерпретации Плетнева, Соколова,Горовица ( 3-й концерт прежде всего ).
@@ediccartman7252 вы хотя бы понимаете величину перечисленных вами имён ..?)
Genius Rachmaninov
sublime
So so good !! Thanks for sharing!
Opus 32, No. 3 in E Major- the best tempo for this M.M.55; These creative works are so in consonance with the tonality of the times, many would not want to hear any music more than this! Part of the tonal awareness was of war, of course; at the other end of the scale opposite of senseless violence, rapacity and death are the great creative musicians. After-effect of war, triumph of the deserving party. 55- the numerology suggests Prudence; also, Broadview. The entire Dayside self tonality can be flooded with awareness. Opus 32, No. 9 in A Major- Noble and Great souls, this probably isn't the same as Mahatmas, eastern- best tempo, M.M. 52- the number suggests Prudence, Unaffectedness or Detachment, Vairag; Development...
I first heard this piece in A Day at the Races. Harpo played a good rendition of Wreckmaninoff....
18:07
Op 32 no 5. Is pure bliss
For me, this interpretion is closer to Rachmaninov himself than many others.
Serenity and peace perfectly captured.
If only I could play this
@@TheChrisEMartin Keep on trying :)
Вера Горностаева хорошо научила внука!
Bravo!
really good but it is a shame the first prelude op 3 no 2 is cut at the end...
Lukas GENIUS-as
perfection *
Why does the first one cut off before the end?? It kinda ruins the whole thing...
I finally bought all of his preludes as sheet music, and wow are they complex. Even if you forget about the technical difficulties, I think it takes a long time to really understand how to feel these pieces when you play them.
Note for myself: 3. 6. 7.8.10.
Anyone now the brand of the piano? Its sounds god-like.
When you've heard the best , everything else sucks!
yep, and Geniusas is absolutely up there with the best!
He has the dramatic presence of Richter.
He oído los primeros segundos y he pensado: "Je suis l'enfant terrible"
интересно, а сам Лукас знает о этой записи)))
Do Lente а зачем ему это знать-то????
Why is the last prelude, Op. 32, No. 13, so loud and fast? No attempt to bring out the inner voices, which Rachmaninoff clearly marks with accents, no phrasing of two note slurs. At the end, all the chords are equally loud. I'm not denying this young man's immense talent, but he has a ways to go in the matter of maturity yet.
Alexis Weissenberg also played the no 13 with some pep. Why do some many Askenkenazy et al assume this is a plodding funeral dirge? ie Occam’s Razor dictates it’s because they don’t have the chops so they assume a practice tempo. I can’t understand how you think this here is too fast...he takes a perfect middle ground tempo. Great stuff. Oh btw Slow and Boring does NOT automatically EQUAL maturity/profundity.
It's loud and fast, but that's an interpretive choice, and perfectly in the realm of great interpretation, at least for me. Maybe this is a particularly appropriate interpretation for the final prelude after you've just played all of them live!
Мая любовь, ну как без ваз, останусь без штанов я Пифагора!!!! Зраз.В вас... Осатанела!!!. 🏓🥃🍹🥣🧂🥢🧃🍯🍬🍥🍖🍟🥚?????
B-dur