Putting people in a prison-like place and abusing them without their permission is just a slavery regardless of the reason why you're doing this. I have no idea why it isn't obvious for everyone.
You asked this AFTER Putin invades Ukraine and kills and maims tens of thousands of civilian women and children? Seriously? This is more than just a single person being sent to a "prison-like place." It's about making an example of that person so that others don't get the same bright idea that they too can benefit from a "safe and secure" civilization without also sacrificing to play a role in ensuring that civilization continues in peace.
@@MaximGhost Slavery is ultimately slavery and Ukrainians and Russian males are both being sacrificed by no reason by leaders that actually won't enter the battlefield. All men around the world should reject war and not sign up to the armed forces. It's people being able to force others to kill others which is why there is war in the first place. Also if women and children are allowed to leave Ukraine, then men should be able to to by the standards of equality.
@@clarus_tx Your view of the world and war (which BTW existed since man first picked up a stick) is a bit naïve, to say the least. What country do you live in?
@@MaximGhost The accurate view to have is to avoid war, I am from the United States and my government has caused a lot of damage around the world and to its own citizens domestically with endless military actions, I therefore oppose the actions of NATO and advocate for complete military drawdown. America's bases around the world have made the world much less safe while costing billions to taxpayers, and the eastward expansion of NATO directly caused the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and now the United States is supplying weapons that will just make more people die unnecessarily. And it is true that wealthy leaders don't fight in wars. Zelensky, Vladimir Putin, and Joe Biden don't shoot each other when they go to meetings with other world leaders, but these types of figures are willing to let those in poverty kill each other, men around the world should not accept being slaves to politicians.
No law can force a human being to give their life. We are not the property of a goverment. The goverment is there to serve the people, We are Not there, to serve to goverment.
Yes, they work 200 hours per month and get paid $500(600000won). Even the wage has been increased a lot thesedays. 5 years ago conscripted soldiers were paid $100 per month. This is a slavery not a military service
Then they should go suck up to Kim Jong Un and give up their country, and with that, give up all the wonders of South Korean society like Kpop and Hyundai.
it's not serving the government as much as any volunteer army, all soldiers that go on foreign deployments have to volunteer, if not you stay at home defending, which i think is justified, and especially when we have North Korea like 30 km from our capital i think it's 100 percent correct to at least give us Basic Combat Training and be reservists, we have to defend the country when at war, South Korea is trying to prevent another Korean War where we got pushed back across the whole country within a couple weeks because our army was untrained and nobody knew how to hold a gun
Wrong,If all the people in the world are peaceful it’s the new world (Paradise Earth) that God promised,hard headed people and war loving people has no place in that new system.(Proverbs 2:21-22).
@@ronaldbercilla1993 oh spare me with that paradise of god. If you want to live peacefully, you must know how to defend yourself than relying on god. THIS is NOT your place
@@ronaldbercilla1993 If you're interested in anti war pacificism from a Christian perspective, I'd heavily recommend Leo Tolstoy's book "The Kingdom of God is Within You"
Isiah 41:10, Do not be afraid, for I am with you. Do not be anxious, for I am your God. I will fortify you, yes, I will help you, I will really hold on to you with my right hand of righteousness.
What about letting them serve in some kind of civil defence? If a war breaks out, they will be needed for firefighting, giving first aid to injured civilians, evacuations, securing food and water supply, etc. That could be an alternative service, vital in a war, and without using weapons.
i thought i was the only 1 thinking bout dat ''she s a woman she never served she has no right 2 judge any1 if they should serve or not she doesnt know how hard it is"
As long as women are not required to carry out compulsory military service while unjustifiably enjoying the same rights as men, it is every South Korean man's duty to dodge it. Israel has had conscription for both sexes since 1948. Norway and Sweden, two of the few European countries that still have conscription, extended it to females in the last decade and other countries are discussing doing the same. South Korea must conscript both sexes. Women need to learn that equal rights imply equal duties.
if women serve they are called incapable of doing the job if they don't do it they are still insulted. pick a struggle man. and remember men are the one that boult the system, vent out your frustration to them
@@sofypi7493 No both men and women can vote, there are male and female politicians. And besides nothing will change by just blaming others, we all have to speak out against this male discrimination, in particular we men because it affects us. Also we should hold women accountable for tolerating this systemic sexism.
The Korean birth rate is getting lower and lower and one of the reason is that women find it hard to commit to a family because the job market isn't mother-friendly. Koreans as an ethnicity might go extinct in a few decades, so pushing for women to give up 2 years of their youth when the optimal window to have a kid is already limited would push birth rate to a negative. Even the ones that would have considered to be moms might consider su*cide instead.
@@layloo5244So? It’s still sexist to expect that only men should be forced to leave their families for 2 years and join an organization that could potentially have them killed if a war ever came. Women can still do MANY jobs like accounting, logistics, support staff and etc that doesn’t need pure bodily power.
-nothing is heavier on military agility and resource like unwilling soldiers - grandad of 40 years service 4 different wars each with a different country ,won and lost.
When I left school, we still had a mandatory service here in Germany. Personally I had no problem with joining the military, but for people who had religious reasons we had an alternative service. It mostly happened in hospitals, kindergartens or other social institues. Maybe this could be an option for korea too.
I would NEVER allow myself to be conscripted. Ever. It should be a crime against humanity to force someone to give up their life because older men can’t get along. Plus there’s a tragic flaw: if enough men are embittered about their compulsory service, they’ll have no incentive to have sons of their own, and with the already low South Korean birth rate, that spells trouble.
As a Korean men who have served 2 years in the army, I have never thought of myself as a proud soldier serving for the country. I always have thought myself as a slave, working 250 hours per month and get paid $100 for my labor. Even more than 50% of Korean people are not doing their duty of defense. 10% of men were exempted because they are ill or they are son of rich politicians,doctors, and CEOs. 100% of women were exempted just because they are not men. Only less than 50% of Korean are working like a slave for 2 years, losing their gold time in 20s. In spite of their service, korean politicians and feminists even mock their duty. This is why men in Korea does not think duty of defense is holy but think it is just a bullshit
Don't bow and be proud of your duty. The spineless always don't value the sacrifice till the time of need comes. I avoided the service in my country - at the time it was mostly just pointless manual labour, no combat training, zero payment. The problem is not conscription by itself, but the organisation of the army. And now, when the war broke into my country, I regret so much of not serving and basically being unable to defend my homeland...
The unforgiving nature of combat requires not only individual skills, such as rifle marksmanship, but also the ability to operate as a team, under fire. Move, shoot, communicate. That takes years of working together as a group, to build unit cohesion and trust. Throwing a bunch of strangers together at the last minute to fight, even if all have some level of previous military training, is a much less effective way to conduct combat operations. It's one thing to be willing to die for your country, it's entirely different to needlessly sacrifice yourself.
The point is, you should not have served, period. Just leave the country and never come back, if you have no alternatives. This perverted system must be made to crumble from the inside, men must organize themselves and refuse en masse to enlist. They cannot arrest everyone, this would destroy the country. Feminists and politicians who support this must be targeted, too.
Complicated question. The U.S. Army's conscript-based force did well in WW2, but soldiers were in for the duration. There was also a bit of a learning curve. The draft Army that was successful on D-Day was a much different than the one that got their butts handed to them at Kasserine Pass two years earlier. If you're a small country like Israel or Switzerland or Finland, potentially facing an existential threat (the Swiss during WW2 and possibly during the Cold War), you may likely need a large body of decently-trained soldiers in case of a full-scale war, in order to be able to sustain continuous casualties over a prolonged period, which requires conscription. This is something that may well be beyond the capabilities of a highly-trained, but much smaller, professional force. For the U.S., the all-volunteer force (AVF) was a solution to the draft Army's breakdown during Vietnam, an unpopular and seemingly endless war. The AVF fixed the problem of the unpopular draft, but then inadvertently created another. The volunteer Army that won the 100-hour war against Iraq and liberated Kuwait in 1991 was the best trained and most capable in our history, as the post-Cold War drawdown had only just started. That was the high point of the AVF. The low point has been the last 20 years of continuous deployments for COIN operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, resulting in the loss of much of the Army's conventional fighting skills. In contrast, during this time frame, the Russians and Chinese kept their focus on training for the conventional fight. This 20 years of unending war happened because only 1% of the U.S. population currently serves in the AVF, including the Reserves/National Guard, which means there was no political pressure to "bring the troops home." Absent a major threat like the Soviet Union, an AVF can be sent on wide range of missions, which may improve skills like nation-building, while degrading others, such as conventional warfighting capabilities, which take significant time and resources to develop. AVF's are also much more expensive, mainly salaries and pension benefits, than a conscript-based force, which reduces the number of troops you can have on active duty, due to budgetary constraints. Again, absent a major threat, this may not be an issue, but isn't fighting and winning against major threats the main reason for an army's existence? Lose that fight and you may lose your country. Just ask the Poles, whose country disappeared for over 100 years, when it was conquered and divided up between Russia and Germany. In summary, an AVF is typically better trained and more capable than a conscript-based force. It is also smaller and more likely to be sent on adventures to far away countries, because of its volunteer nature, to conduct operations that have nothing to do with building and maintaining its core competencies, potentially weakening the force for the "big fight." An AVF with tighter controls on its deployments may be the answer, but once a military is separated from the larger population, due to its volunteer status, the temptation is always going to be there to send it off to slay dragons elsewhere the world, again because of the lack of political consequences back home. This is perhaps best summed up in a 1993 exchange between Secretary of State Madeline Albright and Joint Chiefs Chairman Colin Powell, regarding use of American military force in Bosnia, where Albright asks Powell, "What's the point of having this superb military you're always talking about if we can't use it?"
Based on my experience as a South Korean conscripted soldier, I doubt it. If there is no fear about North Korea could invade South and try to devastate everything South Korean have made, conscripted soldiers of South Korea might refuse to fight. Everybody in Korea would agree with the notion of conscription is much similar to imprisoning. My military service is over, yet I still obligated to server military and I personally doesn't want to fight if South Korea try to invade the other country. I will fight against North Korea for the sake of my beloved, though.
@@Jeongkookkim Thanks for those insights. One thing that I have wondered about, as South Korea becomes more and more prosperous, and as the memory of the Korean War fades, are young men in South Korea as motivated to serve as their fathers and grandfathers were?
The British military refused to re-instate conscription, they deemed it would actually hurt the UK's military strength, because modern warfare is much different to WW2 era warfare; it's much more technologically complex. The British Army already rejects a lot of candidates, they want good intelligent soldiers; conscripts would be useless and would just get in the way. They don't want drafted teenagers who don't want to be there, in charge of million dollar missiles and other complicated military hardware. Look at the research in autonomous weapons, the army would much rather a robot that followed orders to the letter, never made a mistake, and could kill a target with one shot in 1 microsecond, rather than a panicking teenager spraying a 30 round magazine and hitting nothing. This Korean conscription is all about face. If this conscripted army/navy is so great why didn't they help with the MV Sewol instead of just watching it sink?
@@mikesully110 In a limited engagement, technology and training certainty plays a decisive role, which is where a professional army really shines. The Falklands conflict and Desert Storm are perhaps the best examples of this. In an extended conventional war, such as one on the Korean peninsula, South Korea is going to need lots of bodies, to fully cover the battle space and quickly replace the high casualties they will very likely suffer. This is where you need a large reserve system, built on conscription, that can rapidly replace personnel losses. The Yom Kippur War is a very good example of how quickly men and equipment can be lost in a high intensity conflict. It is notable that the Finns kept their conscription system in place while most of Europe shifted to all-volunteer forces at the end of the Cold War. Now the Swedes are bringing back conscription as well. I'm sure both the Finns and Swedes will make every effort to employ technology to the greatest extent possible in a future fight, but it is notable that they want bodies as well. If I were a small country next to a much larger neighbor, particularly one that has invaded me in the past, like the Finns and South Koreans, I would like to have as many available options as possible.
how many times has your organization been wrong about predicting the end of the world LMAO? I think the count is up to 13 now. All religions are corrupt but Jehovas are an evil type of messed up on the same level of Scientology. I hope you one day are able to leave the cult and be free (without having all your friends and family shun you) Search "jehovas witnesses exposed" on UA-cam!
It's sad. Even if they do manage to evade military service they will have a mark against their name that will follow them all their lives in South Korea.
Kiun, I’m sorry that I most likely have butchered your name, But what you said about loving your neighbour as yourself, it’s exactly right we don’t want to hurt anybody even if this will bring great distress on one’s self. We must obey Jehovah rather then man..
I agree with the conscription because their technically still in a war, and North Korea has several million soldiers, even if their tech is bad, they can still zerg rush South Korea and instantly take Seoul(most important city and economic hub).
@@ernestocheguevara2878 It's not just the US though, it's mainly China that doesn't want unification. They don't want a US-allied capitalistic nation directly on their border, they want North Korea as a buffer. Not to mention the only reason that the US doesn't want it is because the only thing more expensive than paying for the military presence in the South is the cost of unification where the South and the US would need to support bringing the entire population of the North out of the stone age and up to the standard of living of the south. This would be astonishingly expensive to do.
Korea's neighbor, in the same country yet, is North Korea. Therefore every able body in Korea should do their duty and serve. Safety is not a given and freedom is obtained at a price. Stop being naive and man up. When you refuse to serve you are letting others sacrifice for you and your loved ones.
As a young guy who's been a citizen of the US since day one but wants to live in rural South Korea for the rest of his life, I gotta say I don't look forward to the draft. But with current tensions building between Russia, Ukraine, the US and other countries during these times, it looks like I'll end up having to deal with a draft regardless. The beauty of South Korea amazes me. Not as beautiful and breath-taking as the beauty of Japan, but still amazing. The people are pretty cool, the language is kinda easy to learn, and I could probably go on and on about what I like about South Korea. Car culture in Korea may not be as awesome as car culture in Japan or the US, but heck it's still pretty nice. But to be back on track, if it's intended for me to serve whether I'm still here in the US or over in South Korea, I will try and do my best to serve, despite my high blood pressure and overweight problem.
How can women be called adults, be elected officials, vote, but not have to share the responsibility to defend their country? Internalized misandry smh
@@jadevlog2833 Oh maybe women should be forced to get pregnant and give childbirth during war time as a similar equivalent then. Oh wait there would be an outrage over that
@@jadevlog2833 Conscription is a sexist law, I don’t actually believe in forcing women to give childbirth lol. I simply made up a similar sexist scenario since you mentioned “can men give birth?” Implying we are disposable because we are unable to do so.
I do not have a great solution for this situation either, but one thing I am certain of: Saying when you refuse to learn how to handle weapons, wars all over the world will stop? That, sadly, is nonsense. Humans as a whole will always have wars, humans are just made like that and it will never change. Single people or small groups can change ,but never the majority of mankind. Especially when the situations around the world get worse, more people get poor, etc, wars will arise, have always, will always. Just saying if I don't do military service wars will stop is pretty naive. It's little children's logic, like, if I close my eyes no one can see me. And sadly I didn't hear an adequate answer when the man said after the protest was online people asked ' And what will happen if we get invaded and we don't have weapons (and no soldiers to handle them)? I wish he would have answerde that question but he did not.
If they don't have a crazy neighbor, there won't be a need for a mandatory miltary service. NK has a large army. SK is trying to match it, so that in eventuality that NK invades them like it happened before, they won't be overwhelmed. Military service isn't about serving the government, it's about serving the people. It's not about violence, but about defense. If there is a problem here, it's about the military culture of violence inside which stems in bullying, which is also rampant outside military.
It really comes down to this if you don’t want to defend South Korea move to North Korea and tell them you are a consioasous objector and see how that goes if North Korea ever invaded the South you are going to have to fight anyway
Supporters of conscription in Korea do not know much about conscription. It is impossible to distinguish between defense obligations and military obligations, that is, military cooperation (which is difficult to express in English) and military obligations.
@@AsokaTw-mz3lr well actually in SK to get jobs you have to go to a good school and get "points" you can only achieve certain points if you go to the military
You can't really establish a company until you graduate from high school... And even after you do graduate from high school at 18, you must serve in the army... Therefore, you can establish a company, only after you have served in the army because in both Koreas, your manliness is and will always be measured by how active you were in the military!
yes this is sad but in India people should do compulsory military service because in my country rather than foreginers our own some special section of peopel are butchering us
The more i live in and learn about korea the more i realise that things aren't as easy as they seem to be. But i must say its imperative to be prepared for north korea though the time for the service should be revised 🤔 i dont know. But their parents paid the price, they should do something, however little it is, to protect what the elders died for. Just my humble opinion 🇺🇬🇺🇬🇺🇬
seems like a waste of time to me. What is a teenager with an assault rifle going to do against a nuclear bomb; or an artificial virus, or an autonomous drone swarm? it's all about face imo. Also what is the point of this conscription they never seem to do anything usefull. Did they help with the MV Sewol? nope.
Just remember the UN member countries went there to defend the 1950 Korean War and many have died. You live in the prosperity from their souls. They were not thinking if they will die. They were not thinking of their religion. That’s how Allied countries works. For Freedom and Democracy.
@@marierocher4422 what freedom is that, I can't even grow a certain plant if I want to without being thrown in jail. Imagine living in a society, where the government can declare growing a certain plant to be illegal. what kind of freedom is that?
@@mikesully110 If you look at what happened to Afghan, currently Ukraine, you should know none used Nuclear weapons, artificial virus, drone swarm etc. You play too much COD games. It''s about maintaining a formidable standing army. If SK was weak, NK, China or even Japan would've invaded them again.
I don’t think it’s fair for several random women bureaucrats to serve in the board that determines Alternative Service case outcomes. Definitely ex servicemen/female officers, but not women civilians who’ve never served.
Everyone is capable to fight in times of danger or oppression. I just could not comprehend why military training is mandatory in SoKor? The only country in SEA that has this law for men.
@@marierocher4422 NK has compulsory military service for women as well as men. If your reasoning is "because your enemy does that", then SK should conscript women as well.
I can understand why you men in korea doesn't want to reenlist in the army I saw a lot of this kind of korean young soldier and its disgusting how they tortures this young men I saw korean army tv show the soldiers eat while on top of their head is this heavy boat while eating May I asked the war expert did you ever saw it during any wars that you have to eat while this heavy boat is on top of your head? How about waking up too early this soldiers then they let them sits on the water they were shivering. You have to protect this young kids not kill them ; you might end upsoldiers that are tired and sleepy so may I asked how can they become good soldiers if you torture them for their 2 years of enlistment enlistment. Korea change the way you treat this young enocent soldiers
What if you're not part of the society, like not having a birth certificate and not going to school to be indoctrinated, but just living a humble life growing/foraging food in the countryside.
Lol. That's how Africans lived when Europeans came and they were forced into "society" through measures like hut tax where you pay a tax for simply having a house thus forcing you to get a job
Most people don’t do it out of fear of hardship and lack of self confidence….to be honest it’s basic training of 1.5 years only. it make them mentally and physically strong ….not doing it giving fake reason is unnecessary …if you don’t have a country then where is religion and where is freedom…so fight for it and be prepared for it…no shame in it
it got a special delay but normally they have to. Maybe they may serve less than 22 months as they are artists and culture ambassadors but it still unknown
@Callisto the Korean government will now form the powerful BTS battalion, instead of a dawoo, they'll be armed with loudspeakers so they can just challenge their enemies to dance offs.
So with your logic, they shouldn't express themselves freely, isn't that the whole point of a democracy? I'm sure the people of NK would like to express themselves freely if they could.
I wonder if people who are against the consriptions happening around the world, understands that the army for those countries is mainly there for deterrance purposes other than a few countries who are actively making wars so that their war industries and territories can be expanded. Korea's situation can be a touch and go at any given time. WIthout the deterrance, who are protecting those peace activists and Jehovah Witnesses from getting killed in South Korea? While these people are sitting in their own offices, drinking coffee in a comfortable environment, the soldiers in the country are the ones that made these possible. Peace activists and Jehovah wintess are not going to stop any army dead in their march and those who hide like cowards will be waiting for USA to save them, the very violence that they abhor. Irony is it?
What's the point of a country existing if it's willing to force it's people to suffer and sacrifice for it? I wouldn't want to live in such a dystopian, tyrannical country especially since harassment and maltreatment of conscripts is very high in korea
Who refuse a mandatory draft because of their belief, they can do it as an alternative service..... digging out landmines applied battlefields all over the world includes DMZ, which I believe it will quite fullfill their religion.
I’m sorry but this is hard for me to watch because the objectors doesn’t realize that it’s because of the military that they even have the freedom to ponder whether military service is good or bad. They need to put themselves in the shoes of their brothers and sisters to their north whom don’t have the option of thinking about not serving in the military. All I see in this story is a bunch of well fed free people complaining about the very system that delivered them their freedoms.
@@sopadurso This is true, but we're not at that point in the future yet to where the military threat from the North has abated. The North remains a significant threat and the South must be fully prepared in case of a conflict. The last time I checked, The Supreme Leader was not yet subscribing to peaceful coexistence. I think the mandatory service is a good thing, and I don't have any issue with objectors doing some other form of service, but the people talking about peace like the DPRK isn't just across the border look a little like idiots to me here.
Your opinion is just based on your misunderstaning of Korean militrary system. As a korean men and who have served Korean army for 2years, I am always thankful to soldiers guarding my people. However, still the conscription system of Korea has lots of problems. First, it is unfair that only men are conscripted for 2 years getting paid less than $2 per hour for their labor. If all of Korean people were conscripted, there would be less complaint by Korean men. However, Korean women are not conscripted for even a second. Also they do not pay extra taxes for duty of defense. This means at least 50% of Korean are doing nothing for theri duty of defense, while other 50% are working like a slave for 2 years. Try to put yourself in the shoes of men serving for about 2 years. Do you think it is a fair system? Second, there are some men getting exemption by bribing civil servants serving in ministry of defense. Korean men are classified to 5 ranks by their physical traits. Rank 1 is the men with no problem in their body, and rank 5 is people who are getting exemption because of ill physical traits. By bribing some civil servants, sons of politicians, doctors, CEOs, and celebrities have manipulated their ranks to get exemption. By bribing, people who are destined to get rank 5 have to receive rank 4, which makes them to serve for social service agent for 2 years. To sum up, more than 50% of Korean(women + sons of rich people) are free riding the duty of defense. Only poor men who does not have power are serving for 2 years getting paid less than $2 per hour. Is there any problem in Korean men's protesting for their rights? Finally your logic is absurd. Let's assume that you are paid $1 while others doing same work are getting paid $10. Is there no problem just because you are receiving at least 10 times more than people doing same work in Africa? If you compare south koreans to north koreans, I could compare you to people who are living in poverty. All I see in your comment is a well fed Westerner who have not served for even a 1 second in military disciplining other people
@@kjthekilojuliet2408 Good points man, I appreciate your perspective and it helps educate the rest of us as to the problems the current system has. First, I'm not Korean so I defer to you as to the accuracy of my thoughts here... my opinion is that perhaps women should be included in the "draft" such as apparently happens in Israel which I think is a decent comparison considering that these are two countries who both have imminent threats bordering them. Second, there should be an effort to decrease the corruption of which you speak around rich people paying their way out of service. I do not think any system will ever be perfect, but adding women to the draft and attempting to seek out and cease as much corruption as is possible sounds like a good start - along with increasing the pay for those who serve in the military. There is no excuse for paying a low amount to the brave service members defending their country and also if pay was increased there would be less resistance to serving. Please let me know if you think my thoughts are accurate, I'm actually travelling to S. Korea next month and I want to ensure I understand the culture and people.
@@kinkane5566 Thanks for your interest in Korea. I mostly agree with your argument. First, I agree that women should be included in the 'draft' like Israel. In 2020 the conscription rate for men was 90%. This means that other than the exempted 10%, all men are conscripted as a soldier or social service agent. This crazy rate is a big problem because it is related to Korea's low fertility rate, which was 0.92 in 2019. Due to the low birth rate, there are less men healthy enough to get a rank of 1 to 3, but Korean military requires at least 300,000 soldiers of rank 1 to 3. This situation makes people who are destined to get rank 5 get rank 4 and people who are destined to receive rank 4 receive rank 3. For example, I met tens of soldiers with severe obesity, rare eye disease, or herniated disk in the boot camp. These guys evidently had physical problems. However, they were conscripted due to the lack of soldiers. The real problem of not conscripting women is that ill men have to be conscripted like the soliders I met in the boot camp. Therefore, by conscripting healthy women, ill men will not have to suffer from conscription. Second, it is almost impossible to decrease the corruption because their manipulation of rank is very difficult to find. (There are even secret brokers and agents in this field.) Therefore, in my opinion, the best solution of conscription is to increase the payment for soldiers, which is possible. South Korea wastes billions of dollars in military corruption. Generals buy simple USB from their relative's company paying $1000, which is insane. By decreasing corruption in military budget, Korean government can increase wage of soldiers. P.S I wish your delightful trip in Korea.
@@singaporenoodles7189 Again, if a woman is raising a child she can't leave her kid for 2 years, that can cause a lot of mental problems for a baby to be disconnected from their mother.
@@ChongiFishing In countries where conscription for females is mandatory, almost all of them provide exemptions for women with babies or having a young child.
This program shows a little nonsense and a minor deviation and partialism. i served in the Korean army for 39 month 3year &3mon, and served as a active reserve until age 43. But as the title "is".. nice episode by Aljazeera.
ahha* O 🌏Al Jazeera English! New the best* Very very very very very Exclusive* for me.. Ladies and gentlemen! We will never forget! Good health always! Thank you. O yes, SAVE OUR PLANET 🌏🌎🌍!!! 👍 # Cop 26 SAVE OUR PLANET 🌏🌍🌎! 👍 '' we are talked a lot about, but we are not listened to '' -why? 😀 Thank you. 😀😀
The most important thing is to serve your country. Not all man are able to fight but at least you should do something else like making food, helping the elderly, cleaning de street, working in hospital... Whatever to help the community that gave you everything.
I am a proud veterans of United States when I hear and see stuff like this I think it’s time for United States pull out why should Our boys and girls go there and fight and die for someone who won’t even fight for the country we have a history of doing this Afghan was enough they didn’t have a Will to fight for their freedom I have had enough South Korea is a rich and powerful country they can handle their own business I don’t mind fighting or dying for freedom if the next man is willing to do that for his own Country when I go to war to fight for someone they must first show that they have the Will to fight for the home country it’s that simple🤔😷😎🙏🙏🙏
To those protestING. Those soldiers are protecting your lives. While we serve the God of peace don't forget that He is also the God of war. While there is evil on this earth, war will be necessary. Don't forget that was war even in heaven at one time
I feel it makes a country more united. At peast how i feel wgen i see Israel... He could witness to peopoe in jail or military. Everyone should hear the good news. Im not JW im catholic but all bibles say we suppose to witness to otthers.
Well when comes it doesn’t matter if you oppose it will still come and it affect you I would rather be ready than be caught unprepared and every country has a right to defend itself
Ideally, every man should contribute to the defense of the nation, as we see in Israel, Switzerland and Finland. In reality, it's difficult to maintain this absent an ongoing threat to one's country. Once the Cold War ended in Europe, nearly all countries shifted away from conscription to volunteer forces. Absent a major war, I don't believe the U.S. will ever return to a draft military, because it would be so unpopular. But, building a large and capable reserve force that can be mobilized in wartime is a lengthy undertaking. There are ongoing efforts to do this in Ukraine, due to the current threat of invasion from Russia, but it's really too little, too late, to build cohesive and capable reserve units. The Finns were one of the few European nations to maintain a large reserve force following the end of the Cold War, and that puts them in much better shape than their neighbor Sweden, which is racing to rebuild its capabilities. That's really the ideal - a conscript-based force that serves two years on active duty, followed by 20 years in the reserves, in order to build a wide-ranging capability that can quickly be mobilized in an emergency. Yes, a young man loses two years to the military, and has to stay engaged part-time for the next 20 years, but so are all his male friends and colleagues. A shared service by all to one's country.
You do realize it has the highest suicide rates of every military, their soldiers are probably the most harassed and hazed soldiers out of every "free" country
jesus christ 0:35 he is so cute, I can't even concentrate on this grim topic lol why are korean men so handsome...? Maybe it's the army giving them this elegant strong look...?
I'll serve my country when it serves me, I have to work and pay for everything here, my country provides nothing. The elites take 99% of the profits. So why should I risk my life for these fools?
To be fair, South Korean miltary sevice can suck alot. Soliders get paid below minimum wage, and many rich people take back doors (bribe) to avoid conscription, so it's understandable why many Korean men finds miltary service unattractive.
Putting people in a prison-like place and abusing them without their permission is just a slavery regardless of the reason why you're doing this.
I have no idea why it isn't obvious for everyone.
All conscription must be ended!
You asked this AFTER Putin invades Ukraine and kills and maims tens of thousands of civilian women and children?
Seriously?
This is more than just a single person being sent to a "prison-like place." It's about making an example of that person so that others don't get the same bright idea that they too can benefit from a "safe and secure" civilization without also sacrificing to play a role in ensuring that civilization continues in peace.
@@MaximGhost Slavery is ultimately slavery and Ukrainians and Russian males are both being sacrificed by no reason by leaders that actually won't enter the battlefield. All men around the world should reject war and not sign up to the armed forces.
It's people being able to force others to kill others which is why there is war in the first place. Also if women and children are allowed to leave Ukraine, then men should be able to to by the standards of equality.
@@clarus_tx Your view of the world and war (which BTW existed since man first picked up a stick) is a bit naïve, to say the least. What country do you live in?
@@MaximGhost The accurate view to have is to avoid war, I am from the United States and my government has caused a lot of damage around the world and to its own citizens domestically with endless military actions, I therefore oppose the actions of NATO and advocate for complete military drawdown. America's bases around the world have made the world much less safe while costing billions to taxpayers, and the eastward expansion of NATO directly caused the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and now the United States is supplying weapons that will just make more people die unnecessarily.
And it is true that wealthy leaders don't fight in wars. Zelensky, Vladimir Putin, and Joe Biden don't shoot each other when they go to meetings with other world leaders, but these types of figures are willing to let those in poverty kill each other, men around the world should not accept being slaves to politicians.
No law can force a human being to give their life. We are not the property of a goverment. The goverment is there to serve the people, We are Not there, to serve to goverment.
Underrated comment
Freedom isn’t free. Grow up.
@@zico739 freedom is free unless you are stupid
@@faizokawuma7576 You must not be familiar with a conflict called The Korean War...
@@zico739 Being forced to risk your life against your will in an army is called freedom now??? where I come from that's called slavery
I have known several that left Korea and will not return because of it and all of them object to the very low pay and harshness of it.
Yes, they work 200 hours per month and get paid $500(600000won).
Even the wage has been increased a lot thesedays.
5 years ago conscripted soldiers were paid $100 per month.
This is a slavery not a military service
This is extremely sad. no one should be force to go to prison for not wanting to serve the government
Then they should go suck up to Kim Jong Un and give up their country, and with that, give up all the wonders of South Korean society like Kpop and Hyundai.
Try not paying taxes.
you can work as a prison guard or work in a government establishment instead now.
@@17Trees33 It's still bad. they should just migrate to India and stay until they turn into 30 as for Koreans visa is freely granted.
it's not serving the government as much as any volunteer army, all soldiers that go on foreign deployments have to volunteer, if not you stay at home defending, which i think is justified, and especially when we have North Korea like 30 km from our capital i think it's 100 percent correct to at least give us Basic Combat Training and be reservists, we have to defend the country when at war, South Korea is trying to prevent another Korean War where we got pushed back across the whole country within a couple weeks because our army was untrained and nobody knew how to hold a gun
Mandatory male only conscription is absolutely sexist and misandrist.
Worst part is they are not socially appreciated lol.
If the world was full of conscientious objectors we could watch Biden and Putin punching it out on pay per view.
Wrong,If all the people in the world are peaceful it’s the new world (Paradise Earth) that God promised,hard headed people and war loving people has no place in that new system.(Proverbs 2:21-22).
Why Biden? This is Putin's war. Putin can come out from his bunker and fight Zelensky.
@@ronaldbercilla1993 oh spare me with that paradise of god. If you want to live peacefully, you must know how to defend yourself than relying on god. THIS is NOT your place
@@ronaldbercilla1993 If you're interested in anti war pacificism from a Christian perspective, I'd heavily recommend Leo Tolstoy's book "The Kingdom of God is Within You"
@@ronaldbercilla1993virtually impossible
Isiah 41:10, Do not be afraid, for I am with you. Do not be anxious, for I am your God. I will fortify you, yes, I will help you, I will really hold on to you with my right hand of righteousness.
it never works! nuclear warhead has no belief.
What about letting them serve in some kind of civil defence? If a war breaks out, they will be needed for firefighting, giving first aid to injured civilians, evacuations, securing food and water supply, etc. That could be an alternative service, vital in a war, and without using weapons.
@7:15 as a woman she does not have to serve the military yet she decides which males must serve the military.
Yes nothing makes sense in Korean conscription.
Women can serve as an officer in Korea if they want. However, women cannot serve as a soldier.
@@kjthekilojuliet2408 the reason why is because if they were to end up as prisoners of war they can get a bit better treatment than a private
i thought i was the only 1 thinking bout dat ''she s a woman she never served she has no right 2 judge any1 if they should serve or not she doesnt know how hard it is"
@@1z342 Absolutely correct
Free riders should not have right to judge others
@@1p4142136 there are a lot of gays nowadays. so men can get bad treatments too in the war as a prisoner.
As long as women are not required to carry out compulsory military service while unjustifiably enjoying the same rights as men, it is every South Korean man's duty to dodge it. Israel has had conscription for both sexes since 1948. Norway and Sweden, two of the few European countries that still have conscription, extended it to females in the last decade and other countries are discussing doing the same. South Korea must conscript both sexes. Women need to learn that equal rights imply equal duties.
if women serve they are called incapable of doing the job if they don't do it they are still insulted. pick a struggle man. and remember men are the one that boult the system, vent out your frustration to them
@@sofypi7493 No both men and women can vote, there are male and female politicians. And besides nothing will change by just blaming others, we all have to speak out against this male discrimination, in particular we men because it affects us. Also we should hold women accountable for tolerating this systemic sexism.
The Korean birth rate is getting lower and lower and one of the reason is that women find it hard to commit to a family because the job market isn't mother-friendly. Koreans as an ethnicity might go extinct in a few decades, so pushing for women to give up 2 years of their youth when the optimal window to have a kid is already limited would push birth rate to a negative. Even the ones that would have considered to be moms might consider su*cide instead.
@@chroslegos423but it was men who decided that women shouldnt serve. You’re angry at the wrong group of people.
@@layloo5244So? It’s still sexist to expect that only men should be forced to leave their families for 2 years and join an organization that could potentially have them killed if a war ever came. Women can still do MANY jobs like accounting, logistics, support staff and etc that doesn’t need pure bodily power.
-nothing is heavier on military agility and resource like unwilling soldiers -
grandad of 40 years service 4 different wars each with a different country ,won and lost.
Maybe u can make a documentary about draft dodgers in Singapore. Singapore has a mandatory draft of 2 years for male citizens
When I left school, we still had a mandatory service here in Germany. Personally I had no problem with joining the military, but for people who had religious reasons we had an alternative service. It mostly happened in hospitals, kindergartens or other social institues. Maybe this could be an option for korea too.
That's what they do for conscientious objectors I'm pretty sure
Then so many would request alternative service
For what? 6 months? That’s piece of cake stfu
I am n American and never even registered for selective service and i am proud of it.
America don't have mandatory conscription
@@justlim622 actually we do.
America does not have Mandatory military conscription. I lived in California for 50 years. @@001looker
@@001lookeronly when it's a war situation.....but who will go to eat with u guys !!! You are the strongest right now 🙄
“War is Mass Murder, Conscription is Slavery, Taxation is Robbery.”
― Murray N. Rothbard
Agree
💯💯
I would NEVER allow myself to be conscripted. Ever. It should be a crime against humanity to force someone to give up their life because older men can’t get along. Plus there’s a tragic flaw: if enough men are embittered about their compulsory service, they’ll have no incentive to have sons of their own, and with the already low South Korean birth rate, that spells trouble.
Your labor is taxed which is essentially the same. You're just used to it and you accept it.
As a Korean men who have served 2 years in the army, I have never thought of myself as a proud soldier serving for the country.
I always have thought myself as a slave, working 250 hours per month and get paid $100 for my labor.
Even more than 50% of Korean people are not doing their duty of defense.
10% of men were exempted because they are ill or they are son of rich politicians,doctors, and CEOs.
100% of women were exempted just because they are not men.
Only less than 50% of Korean are working like a slave for 2 years, losing their gold time in 20s.
In spite of their service, korean politicians and feminists even mock their duty.
This is why men in Korea does not think duty of defense is holy but think it is just a bullshit
Don't bow and be proud of your duty. The spineless always don't value the sacrifice till the time of need comes.
I avoided the service in my country - at the time it was mostly just pointless manual labour, no combat training, zero payment. The problem is not conscription by itself, but the organisation of the army. And now, when the war broke into my country, I regret so much of not serving and basically being unable to defend my homeland...
@@mrninet645 Are you Ukrainian?
The unforgiving nature of combat requires not only individual skills, such as rifle marksmanship, but also the ability to operate as a team, under fire. Move, shoot, communicate. That takes years of working together as a group, to build unit cohesion and trust.
Throwing a bunch of strangers together at the last minute to fight, even if all have some level of previous military training, is a much less effective way to conduct combat operations. It's one thing to be willing to die for your country, it's entirely different to needlessly sacrifice yourself.
if you cant honor your country. go to north korea!
The point is, you should not have served, period. Just leave the country and never come back, if you have no alternatives. This perverted system must be made to crumble from the inside, men must organize themselves and refuse en masse to enlist. They cannot arrest everyone, this would destroy the country. Feminists and politicians who support this must be targeted, too.
The question is, do conscripted solders actualy perform well during war? Or should a country put in more resources on a voluntary army?
Complicated question.
The U.S. Army's conscript-based force did well in WW2, but soldiers were in for the duration. There was also a bit of a learning curve. The draft Army that was successful on D-Day was a much different than the one that got their butts handed to them at Kasserine Pass two years earlier.
If you're a small country like Israel or Switzerland or Finland, potentially facing an existential threat (the Swiss during WW2 and possibly during the Cold War), you may likely need a large body of decently-trained soldiers in case of a full-scale war, in order to be able to sustain continuous casualties over a prolonged period, which requires conscription. This is something that may well be beyond the capabilities of a highly-trained, but much smaller, professional force.
For the U.S., the all-volunteer force (AVF) was a solution to the draft Army's breakdown during Vietnam, an unpopular and seemingly endless war. The AVF fixed the problem of the unpopular draft, but then inadvertently created another. The volunteer Army that won the 100-hour war against Iraq and liberated Kuwait in 1991 was the best trained and most capable in our history, as the post-Cold War drawdown had only just started. That was the high point of the AVF.
The low point has been the last 20 years of continuous deployments for COIN operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, resulting in the loss of much of the Army's conventional fighting skills. In contrast, during this time frame, the Russians and Chinese kept their focus on training for the conventional fight. This 20 years of unending war happened because only 1% of the U.S. population currently serves in the AVF, including the Reserves/National Guard, which means there was no political pressure to "bring the troops home."
Absent a major threat like the Soviet Union, an AVF can be sent on wide range of missions, which may improve skills like nation-building, while degrading others, such as conventional warfighting capabilities, which take significant time and resources to develop. AVF's are also much more expensive, mainly salaries and pension benefits, than a conscript-based force, which reduces the number of troops you can have on active duty, due to budgetary constraints.
Again, absent a major threat, this may not be an issue, but isn't fighting and winning against major threats the main reason for an army's existence? Lose that fight and you may lose your country. Just ask the Poles, whose country disappeared for over 100 years, when it was conquered and divided up between Russia and Germany.
In summary, an AVF is typically better trained and more capable than a conscript-based force. It is also smaller and more likely to be sent on adventures to far away countries, because of its volunteer nature, to conduct operations that have nothing to do with building and maintaining its core competencies, potentially weakening the force for the "big fight."
An AVF with tighter controls on its deployments may be the answer, but once a military is separated from the larger population, due to its volunteer status, the temptation is always going to be there to send it off to slay dragons elsewhere the world, again because of the lack of political consequences back home. This is perhaps best summed up in a 1993 exchange between Secretary of State Madeline Albright and Joint Chiefs Chairman Colin Powell, regarding use of American military force in Bosnia, where Albright asks Powell, "What's the point of having this superb military you're always talking about if we can't use it?"
Based on my experience as a South Korean conscripted soldier, I doubt it. If there is no fear about North Korea could invade South and try to devastate everything South Korean have made, conscripted soldiers of South Korea might refuse to fight. Everybody in Korea would agree with the notion of conscription is much similar to imprisoning. My military service is over, yet I still obligated to server military and I personally doesn't want to fight if South Korea try to invade the other country. I will fight against North Korea for the sake of my beloved, though.
@@Jeongkookkim Thanks for those insights. One thing that I have wondered about, as South Korea becomes more and more prosperous, and as the memory of the Korean War fades, are young men in South Korea as motivated to serve as their fathers and grandfathers were?
The British military refused to re-instate conscription, they deemed it would actually hurt the UK's military strength, because modern warfare is much different to WW2 era warfare; it's much more technologically complex. The British Army already rejects a lot of candidates, they want good intelligent soldiers; conscripts would be useless and would just get in the way. They don't want drafted teenagers who don't want to be there, in charge of million dollar missiles and other complicated military hardware.
Look at the research in autonomous weapons, the army would much rather a robot that followed orders to the letter, never made a mistake, and could kill a target with one shot in 1 microsecond, rather than a panicking teenager spraying a 30 round magazine and hitting nothing.
This Korean conscription is all about face. If this conscripted army/navy is so great why didn't they help with the MV Sewol instead of just watching it sink?
@@mikesully110 In a limited engagement, technology and training certainty plays a decisive role, which is where a professional army really shines. The Falklands conflict and Desert Storm are perhaps the best examples of this.
In an extended conventional war, such as one on the Korean peninsula, South Korea is going to need lots of bodies, to fully cover the battle space and quickly replace the high casualties they will very likely suffer. This is where you need a large reserve system, built on conscription, that can rapidly replace personnel losses. The Yom Kippur War is a very good example of how quickly men and equipment can be lost in a high intensity conflict.
It is notable that the Finns kept their conscription system in place while most of Europe shifted to all-volunteer forces at the end of the Cold War. Now the Swedes are bringing back conscription as well. I'm sure both the Finns and Swedes will make every effort to employ technology to the greatest extent possible in a future fight, but it is notable that they want bodies as well.
If I were a small country next to a much larger neighbor, particularly one that has invaded me in the past, like the Finns and South Koreans, I would like to have as many available options as possible.
He should be getting out next year, I'm so happy he stuck to his principles and he had such a loving family to support them
Me and my family pray for Jehovah's holy spirit to be with our brothers and sisters in Korea.
how many times has your organization been wrong about predicting the end of the world LMAO? I think the count is up to 13 now. All religions are corrupt but Jehovas are an evil type of messed up on the same level of Scientology. I hope you one day are able to leave the cult and be free (without having all your friends and family shun you) Search "jehovas witnesses exposed" on UA-cam!
@@stateradio115 cringe atheist but jehovahs are wack lol
Things were desperate during the Korean war that almost every able-bodied men were forcibly drafted in the military. It's good to be prepared.
More the military train during peace time, the better prepared there are for war.
Even authoritarian China doesn't have conscription since it became the People's Republic in 1949, though it's because of their massive population.
It’s better to be a warrior in a Garden then be a Gardner in a war
bruce lee hated war and he didnt mean his quote like this
It's sad. Even if they do manage to evade military service they will have a mark against their name that will follow them all their lives in South Korea.
Stay strong my young Brother, may our God Jehovah continue to feed you through the coming years, i to will pray for you!!
Kiun, I’m sorry that I most likely have butchered your name, But what you said about loving your neighbour as yourself, it’s exactly right we don’t want to hurt anybody even if this will bring great distress on one’s self. We must obey Jehovah rather then man..
@@i.c.u.2907 Jehovah only exist in your brain
I don't see women crying about inequality in this case.
working in prison is so much more worse for me
I agree with the conscription because their technically still in a war, and North Korea has several million soldiers, even if their tech is bad, they can still zerg rush South Korea and instantly take Seoul(most important city and economic hub).
Hope someday both koreas would settle their dispute and would come out as more healthier neighbors
😪
That would not be what the US regime wants.
@@ernestocheguevara2878 It's not just the US though, it's mainly China that doesn't want unification. They don't want a US-allied capitalistic nation directly on their border, they want North Korea as a buffer. Not to mention the only reason that the US doesn't want it is because the only thing more expensive than paying for the military presence in the South is the cost of unification where the South and the US would need to support bringing the entire population of the North out of the stone age and up to the standard of living of the south. This would be astonishingly expensive to do.
@@ernestocheguevara2878 Chinese commies fought on the side of North Korea right before it could have been unified, back in the 50s.
@@kinkane5566 the best for north korea would probebally bbee like what china did in the 1980s
Korea's neighbor, in the same country yet, is North Korea. Therefore every able body in Korea should do their duty and serve. Safety is not a given and freedom is obtained at a price. Stop being naive and man up. When you refuse to serve you are letting others sacrifice for you and your loved ones.
I think doubling their time is absolutely ludicrous. It should be the same time as active duty.
As a young guy who's been a citizen of the US since day one but wants to live in rural South Korea for the rest of his life, I gotta say I don't look forward to the draft. But with current tensions building between Russia, Ukraine, the US and other countries during these times, it looks like I'll end up having to deal with a draft regardless. The beauty of South Korea amazes me. Not as beautiful and breath-taking as the beauty of Japan, but still amazing. The people are pretty cool, the language is kinda easy to learn, and I could probably go on and on about what I like about South Korea. Car culture in Korea may not be as awesome as car culture in Japan or the US, but heck it's still pretty nice.
But to be back on track, if it's intended for me to serve whether I'm still here in the US or over in South Korea, I will try and do my best to serve, despite my high blood pressure and overweight problem.
You earn my true respect! I have dodged the draft in 2018, which was ironically the year it ended and I deeply regret it now!
How can women be called adults, be elected officials, vote, but not have to share the responsibility to defend their country? Internalized misandry smh
Can men give birth? When they can maybe we could consider conscription for all.
@@jadevlog2833 Oh maybe women should be forced to get pregnant and give childbirth during war time as a similar equivalent then. Oh wait there would be an outrage over that
Wow, this type of rhetoric is part of the problem. It’s sad really. Good luck out there 🤢
@@jadevlog2833 Conscription is a sexist law, I don’t actually believe in forcing women to give childbirth lol. I simply made up a similar sexist scenario since you mentioned “can men give birth?” Implying we are disposable because we are unable to do so.
@@jadevlog2833who forces you to give birth?
All conscription must be ended!
I do not have a great solution for this situation either, but one thing I am certain of: Saying when you refuse to learn how to handle weapons, wars all over the world will stop? That, sadly, is nonsense. Humans as a whole will always have wars, humans are just made like that and it will never change. Single people or small groups can change ,but never the majority of mankind. Especially when the situations around the world get worse, more people get poor, etc, wars will arise, have always, will always. Just saying if I don't do military service wars will stop is pretty naive. It's little children's logic, like, if I close my eyes no one can see me.
And sadly I didn't hear an adequate answer when the man said after the protest was online people asked ' And what will happen if we get invaded and we don't have weapons (and no soldiers to handle them)? I wish he would have answerde that question but he did not.
well then, if a country's government has to force their citizens to fight, then the country deserves to end its reign
this is a great point
Any one who dose not help protect his own house is a coward.
If they don't have a crazy neighbor, there won't be a need for a mandatory miltary service. NK has a large army. SK is trying to match it, so that in eventuality that NK invades them like it happened before, they won't be overwhelmed. Military service isn't about serving the government, it's about serving the people. It's not about violence, but about defense. If there is a problem here, it's about the military culture of violence inside which stems in bullying, which is also rampant outside military.
What if it is not meant for them, they should think about it
South Korea should ban this relic of a practice. Blame western governments antagonizing and separating the Korean people into fighting each other.
and after that waving thier hand for help. how do you honor your country!?
It really comes down to this if you don’t want to defend South Korea move to North Korea and tell them you are a consioasous objector and see how that goes if North Korea ever invaded the South you are going to have to fight anyway
My parents also send me for my first day of full time national service.
Would you be willjng to share your experience with me? You do not have to if its to tough
Supporters of conscription in Korea do not know much about conscription. It is impossible to distinguish between defense obligations and military obligations, that is, military cooperation (which is difficult to express in English) and military obligations.
I can’t take you seriously when your nickname is literally NORTH KOREA
@@gjdud12 It's just kidding
Word
Really big assumptions there lad
japan have volunteer defense army and it rank higher then south korean military
@@Hwje1111 who told you that japan navy is stronger then all asean countries combined, also japan have usa as allie so no they not weak
평화는 결코 그냥 얻어지는 것이 아니다..
I have question how can you attend conscription if you own a company?
you can't really own a company until you serve. it's difficult to even find a job, that's why most men serve young
@@lindsaysmith3511 It sounds really misandrist. never thought Korea is such a third world country in terms of human rights.
@@AsokaTw-mz3lr well actually in SK to get jobs you have to go to a good school and get "points"
you can only achieve certain points if you go to the military
You can't really establish a company until you graduate from high school... And even after you do graduate from high school at 18, you must serve in the army... Therefore, you can establish a company, only after you have served in the army because in both Koreas, your manliness is and will always be measured by how active you were in the military!
@@lindsaysmith3511This is somewhat similar to China's social credit!
Is there corresponding Arabic news for this video?
I’m pretty sure it’s still illegal to avoid enlistment in SK (unlike what the narrator said in the intro).
conscription is slavery.
Conscription soldiers just receive same salary as normal job which is not fair they should at least receive 10 million won per month
I really want all country stop miliary service, or at least no force just advise.
this was really sad
yes this is sad but in India people should do compulsory military service because in my country rather than foreginers our own some special section of peopel are butchering us
The more i live in and learn about korea the more i realise that things aren't as easy as they seem to be. But i must say its imperative to be prepared for north korea though the time for the service should be revised 🤔 i dont know. But their parents paid the price, they should do something, however little it is, to protect what the elders died for. Just my humble opinion 🇺🇬🇺🇬🇺🇬
seems like a waste of time to me. What is a teenager with an assault rifle going to do against a nuclear bomb; or an artificial virus, or an autonomous drone swarm? it's all about face imo. Also what is the point of this conscription they never seem to do anything usefull. Did they help with the MV Sewol? nope.
Just remember the UN member countries went there to defend the 1950 Korean War and many have died. You live in the prosperity from their souls. They were not thinking if they will die. They were not thinking of their religion. That’s how Allied countries works. For Freedom and Democracy.
@@marierocher4422 what freedom is that, I can't even grow a certain plant if I want to without being thrown in jail. Imagine living in a society, where the government can declare growing a certain plant to be illegal. what kind of freedom is that?
@@mikesully110 your language a “certain plant” defines well.. SK is still far from NK.
@@mikesully110 If you look at what happened to Afghan, currently Ukraine, you should know none used Nuclear weapons, artificial virus, drone swarm etc. You play too much COD games. It''s about maintaining a formidable standing army. If SK was weak, NK, China or even Japan would've invaded them again.
The Compulsory Service Concerns The Gallup Poll Film "Geography" In The Jefferson War
I don’t think it’s fair for several random women bureaucrats to serve in the board that determines Alternative Service case outcomes. Definitely ex servicemen/female officers, but not women civilians who’ve never served.
Everyone is capable to fight in times of danger or oppression. I just could not comprehend why military training is mandatory in SoKor? The only country in SEA that has this law for men.
Because your enemy are oblige to undergo training. Because NK/SK are technically at war.
@@marierocher4422 NK has compulsory military service for women as well as men. If your reasoning is "because your enemy does that", then SK should conscript women as well.
If someone does want to serve in military 🎖️🪖 they should be exempted and maybe complete non-military national service instead
I can understand why you men in korea doesn't want to reenlist in the army I saw a lot of this kind of korean young soldier and its disgusting how they tortures this young men I saw korean army tv show the soldiers eat while on top of their head is this heavy boat while eating May I asked the war expert did you ever saw it during any wars that you have to eat while this heavy boat is on top of your head? How about waking up too early this soldiers then they let them sits on the water they were shivering. You have to protect this young kids not kill them ; you might end upsoldiers that are tired and sleepy so may I asked how can they become good soldiers if you torture them for their 2 years of enlistment enlistment. Korea change the way you treat this young enocent soldiers
All these comments from non Koreans thinking they are better, smarter and morally superior
What if you're not part of the society, like not having a birth certificate and not going to school to be indoctrinated, but just living a humble life growing/foraging food in the countryside.
Lol. That's how Africans lived when Europeans came and they were forced into "society" through measures like hut tax where you pay a tax for simply having a house thus forcing you to get a job
How simple
월클 효자손 ㄷㄷ....
썹넬보고 ㅈㄴ 뿜음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
👍👍👍👍👍👍 It was pretty good and So effectively!!!!
Men will automatically want to be soldiers if they were taken to military exhibitions from a very young age!
Most people don’t do it out of fear of hardship and lack of self confidence….to be honest it’s basic training of 1.5 years only. it make them mentally and physically strong ….not doing it giving fake reason is unnecessary …if you don’t have a country then where is religion and where is freedom…so fight for it and be prepared for it…no shame in it
That's a good news for DPRK .
IF the S Korean men's mentality is like this then ITS AN EASY TASK FOR N KOREA TO UNIFY S KOREA
easy kill.
How is this not sexism
It all boils to whether a person is positive or negative when it comes to conscription.
while in Indonesia young men want to join army
I think only Korean people should speak on this subject. I'm just here for eye candy. lol.
Did those BTS guys ever end up having to serve?
So far no I know it got delayed
If you have enough money you can bribe yourself out of it
They will next year
it got a special delay but normally they have to. Maybe they may serve less than 22 months as they are artists and culture ambassadors but it still unknown
@Callisto the Korean government will now form the powerful BTS battalion, instead of a dawoo, they'll be armed with loudspeakers so they can just challenge their enemies to dance offs.
자손이형이 왜 여깄누? 😂😂
The protestors should spend some time studying how people live in North Korea so they would start to understand what they are calling for.
So with your logic, they shouldn't express themselves freely, isn't that the whole point of a democracy? I'm sure the people of NK would like to express themselves freely if they could.
the situation is like this since 1953, I understand that they may ask for debate about the length and possibilites about the service.
I wonder if people who are against the consriptions happening around the world, understands that the army for those countries is mainly there for deterrance purposes other than a few countries who are actively making wars so that their war industries and territories can be expanded.
Korea's situation can be a touch and go at any given time. WIthout the deterrance, who are protecting those peace activists and Jehovah Witnesses from getting killed in South Korea? While these people are sitting in their own offices, drinking coffee in a comfortable environment, the soldiers in the country are the ones that made these possible. Peace activists and Jehovah wintess are not going to stop any army dead in their march and those who hide like cowards will be waiting for USA to save them, the very violence that they abhor. Irony is it?
What's the point of a country existing if it's willing to force it's people to suffer and sacrifice for it? I wouldn't want to live in such a dystopian, tyrannical country especially since harassment and maltreatment of conscripts is very high in korea
Who refuse a mandatory draft because of their belief, they can do it as an alternative service..... digging out landmines applied battlefields all over the world includes DMZ, which I believe it will quite fullfill their religion.
I’m sorry but this is hard for me to watch because the objectors doesn’t realize that it’s because of the military that they even have the freedom to ponder whether military service is good or bad. They need to put themselves in the shoes of their brothers and sisters to their north whom don’t have the option of thinking about not serving in the military. All I see in this story is a bunch of well fed free people complaining about the very system that delivered them their freedoms.
You have a point. But normally people sacrifice themselves so in the future others do not have to do so.
@@sopadurso This is true, but we're not at that point in the future yet to where the military threat from the North has abated. The North remains a significant threat and the South must be fully prepared in case of a conflict. The last time I checked, The Supreme Leader was not yet subscribing to peaceful coexistence. I think the mandatory service is a good thing, and I don't have any issue with objectors doing some other form of service, but the people talking about peace like the DPRK isn't just across the border look a little like idiots to me here.
Your opinion is just based on your misunderstaning of Korean militrary system.
As a korean men and who have served Korean army for 2years, I am always thankful to soldiers guarding my people.
However, still the conscription system of Korea has lots of problems.
First, it is unfair that only men are conscripted for 2 years getting paid less than $2 per hour for their labor.
If all of Korean people were conscripted, there would be less complaint by Korean men.
However, Korean women are not conscripted for even a second. Also they do not pay extra taxes for duty of defense.
This means at least 50% of Korean are doing nothing for theri duty of defense, while other 50% are working like a slave for 2 years. Try to put yourself in the shoes of men serving for about 2 years. Do you think it is a fair system?
Second, there are some men getting exemption by bribing civil servants serving in ministry of defense. Korean men are classified to 5 ranks by their physical traits. Rank 1 is the men with no problem in their body, and rank 5 is people who are getting exemption because of ill physical traits. By bribing some civil servants, sons of politicians, doctors, CEOs, and celebrities have manipulated their ranks to get exemption. By bribing, people who are destined to get rank 5 have to receive rank 4, which makes them to serve for social service agent for 2 years.
To sum up, more than 50% of Korean(women + sons of rich people) are free riding the duty of defense.
Only poor men who does not have power are serving for 2 years getting paid less than $2 per hour.
Is there any problem in Korean men's protesting for their rights?
Finally your logic is absurd. Let's assume that you are paid $1 while others doing same work are getting paid $10.
Is there no problem just because you are receiving at least 10 times more than people doing same work in Africa?
If you compare south koreans to north koreans, I could compare you to people who are living in poverty.
All I see in your comment is a well fed Westerner who have not served for even a 1 second in military disciplining other people
@@kjthekilojuliet2408 Good points man, I appreciate your perspective and it helps educate the rest of us as to the problems the current system has. First, I'm not Korean so I defer to you as to the accuracy of my thoughts here... my opinion is that perhaps women should be included in the "draft" such as apparently happens in Israel which I think is a decent comparison considering that these are two countries who both have imminent threats bordering them. Second, there should be an effort to decrease the corruption of which you speak around rich people paying their way out of service. I do not think any system will ever be perfect, but adding women to the draft and attempting to seek out and cease as much corruption as is possible sounds like a good start - along with increasing the pay for those who serve in the military. There is no excuse for paying a low amount to the brave service members defending their country and also if pay was increased there would be less resistance to serving. Please let me know if you think my thoughts are accurate, I'm actually travelling to S. Korea next month and I want to ensure I understand the culture and people.
@@kinkane5566 Thanks for your interest in Korea. I mostly agree with your argument.
First, I agree that women should be included in the 'draft' like Israel.
In 2020 the conscription rate for men was 90%. This means that other than the exempted 10%, all men are conscripted as a soldier or social service agent. This crazy rate is a big problem because it is related to Korea's low fertility rate, which was 0.92 in 2019. Due to the low birth rate, there are less men healthy enough to get a rank of 1 to 3, but Korean military requires at least 300,000 soldiers of rank 1 to 3.
This situation makes people who are destined to get rank 5 get rank 4 and people who are destined to receive rank 4 receive rank 3. For example, I met tens of soldiers with severe obesity, rare eye disease, or herniated disk in the boot camp.
These guys evidently had physical problems. However, they were conscripted due to the lack of soldiers.
The real problem of not conscripting women is that ill men have to be conscripted like the soliders I met in the boot camp.
Therefore, by conscripting healthy women, ill men will not have to suffer from conscription.
Second, it is almost impossible to decrease the corruption because their manipulation of rank is very difficult to find.
(There are even secret brokers and agents in this field.)
Therefore, in my opinion, the best solution of conscription is to increase the payment for soldiers, which is possible.
South Korea wastes billions of dollars in military corruption. Generals buy simple USB from their relative's company
paying $1000, which is insane. By decreasing corruption in military budget, Korean government can increase wage of soldiers.
P.S I wish your delightful trip in Korea.
Why only men?
If a woman has a child she's raising she can't really just leave for 2 years.
@@morningrog1943 that's bullsh*t it should be mandatory for women too
@@singaporenoodles7189 Again, if a woman is raising a child she can't leave her kid for 2 years, that can cause a lot of mental problems for a baby to be disconnected from their mother.
@@ChongiFishing In countries where conscription for females is mandatory, almost all of them provide exemptions for women with babies or having a young child.
@@dylanl.3366 Exactly and what about fathers too Extra Saucy
This program shows a little nonsense and a minor deviation and partialism. i served in the Korean army for 39 month 3year &3mon, and served as a active reserve until age 43. But as the title "is".. nice episode by Aljazeera.
I would just join the military its only 18 months
Have fun breathing tear gas and murdering other people and you would most likely not survive either
yes military service.
Murdering other human beings for the state
Don’t worry commonwealth countries will come to the world 🌎 rescue again one day
It's frown upon like you have dishonor your family
ahha*
O 🌏Al Jazeera English!
New the best*
Very very very very very Exclusive* for me..
Ladies and gentlemen!
We will never forget!
Good health always!
Thank you.
O yes,
SAVE OUR PLANET 🌏🌎🌍!!!
👍
# Cop 26
SAVE OUR PLANET 🌏🌍🌎!
👍
'' we are talked a lot about, but we are not listened to '' -why?
😀
Thank you.
😀😀
The most important thing is to serve your country. Not all man are able to fight but at least you should do something else like making food, helping the elderly, cleaning de street, working in hospital... Whatever to help the community that gave you everything.
I am a proud veterans of United States when I hear and see stuff like this I think it’s time for United States pull out why should Our boys and girls go there and fight and die for someone who won’t even fight for the country we have a history of doing this Afghan was enough they didn’t have a Will to fight for their freedom I have had enough South Korea is a rich and powerful country they can handle their own business I don’t mind fighting or dying for freedom if the next man is willing to do that for his own Country when I go to war to fight for someone they must first show that they have the Will to fight for the home country it’s that simple🤔😷😎🙏🙏🙏
Please learn how to punctuate and paragraph.
@@bryanmathews8216 my English is very good my friend but that’s not important I’m just making a quick statement this is not English 501🤔
unfortunately your politicians & military industrial complex are pushing for war almost everyday everywhere
To those protestING. Those soldiers are protecting your lives. While we serve the God of peace don't forget that He is also the God of war. While there is evil on this earth, war will be necessary. Don't forget that was war even in heaven at one time
the protesters were protesting arms deals and war propaganda though, not soldiers
I feel it makes a country more united. At peast how i feel wgen i see Israel...
He could witness to peopoe in jail or military. Everyone should hear the good news. Im not JW im catholic but all bibles say we suppose to witness to otthers.
The bible also says thy shall not kill
DPRK#1???
Well when comes it doesn’t matter if you oppose it will still come and it affect you I would rather be ready than be caught unprepared and every country has a right to defend itself
If you serve 18 months then it’s over rather 3 yrs jail
Forced tk breathe tear gas get shot at permanent physical and psychological trauma
Ideally, every man should contribute to the defense of the nation, as we see in Israel, Switzerland and Finland. In reality, it's difficult to maintain this absent an ongoing threat to one's country. Once the Cold War ended in Europe, nearly all countries shifted away from conscription to volunteer forces.
Absent a major war, I don't believe the U.S. will ever return to a draft military, because it would be so unpopular. But, building a large and capable reserve force that can be mobilized in wartime is a lengthy undertaking. There are ongoing efforts to do this in Ukraine, due to the current threat of invasion from Russia, but it's really too little, too late, to build cohesive and capable reserve units.
The Finns were one of the few European nations to maintain a large reserve force following the end of the Cold War, and that puts them in much better shape than their neighbor Sweden, which is racing to rebuild its capabilities. That's really the ideal - a conscript-based force that serves two years on active duty, followed by 20 years in the reserves, in order to build a wide-ranging capability that can quickly be mobilized in an emergency. Yes, a young man loses two years to the military, and has to stay engaged part-time for the next 20 years, but so are all his male friends and colleagues. A shared service by all to one's country.
Lollll !
So what do we as a gender get in return? For putting more burdens on our shoulders than women?
Weird thought but does the Bible mention Asia/Asians anywhere? ...
How do Asians relate to the Bible?
India has huge population take youth from India to south Korea for military purpose they will definitely come. Both men and women.
Military service over there is like kindergarten. Easy and a waste of time.
You do realize it has the highest suicide rates of every military, their soldiers are probably the most harassed and hazed soldiers out of every "free" country
jesus christ 0:35 he is so cute, I can't even concentrate on this grim topic lol why are korean men so handsome...? Maybe it's the army giving them this elegant strong look...?
คนไทยทำได้ๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆ
Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand, Thailand,...................................
Khrap 555555
least nationalistic thai
Tell that to the enemies when they invade. Tell them they have no rights to invade South Korea on religious grounds. Wake up and serve your country
I'll serve my country when it serves me, I have to work and pay for everything here, my country provides nothing. The elites take 99% of the profits. So why should I risk my life for these fools?
To be fair, South Korean miltary sevice can suck alot.
Soliders get paid below minimum wage, and many rich people take back doors (bribe) to avoid conscription, so it's understandable why many Korean men finds miltary service unattractive.
효자손이 여길 나오네?
You can't avoid unless you are a BTS member 🙄
The only people against the draft are kpop Stans which are the worst people in the world, so it kinda goes without saying
They are punks who refuse to serve
A world WITHOUT WAR…ha, haha, HAHAHAHA, is he serious???? 🤔 What a DREAM 😂😭