I really wish runick cards didn't do the banish thing, if they didn't then I think they wouldn't lend themselves so well to a stun playstyle since the stun decks wouldn't have a win con
Steeds can only pop monsters so it wouldnt really out the problem cards of this matchup, he probably sided it out to prevent bricking on it and to increase his chance at drawing outs to the floodgates.
You aren’t wrong, steeds technically would help out here because you could Rei cl1 steeds cl2 to pop Rei so the banish effect of Rei resolves to remove it
You cannot negate the effects of a monster that is already being negated. (Directly. The intricate details of this ruling is slightly weird, but I'm just stating only the basic version of this). You cannot use Impermanence while Skill Drain is up, basically. You also cannot use imperm on a monster that has already been impermed, but you can initially target the same monster with imperm twice, but the last imperm on chain will *not* resolve.
@@halodragonmasterthe case with imperm is because it would do nothing if you activate it targeting a negated monster; and you cant activate a card that does nothing
man the runick player really did draw the worse possible floodgates for this matchup game 1, honestly pretty funny.
Triple solemn judgement is insane
No idea how Runick Stun is still a thing after all this time.
Does anyone know the name of the soundtrack?
I really wish runick cards didn't do the banish thing, if they didn't then I think they wouldn't lend themselves so well to a stun playstyle since the stun decks wouldn't have a win con
Omg, Ulti-Reirautari and the New Lara are wind monsters now (D1)🥵
🤣🤣🤣
His ritual beast ass is on the typhoon trap bruh omg
What do, why, how, huh?
Why did he side out steed? He would have won G2. Also runick stun most garbage deck in existance
Steeds can only pop monsters so it wouldnt really out the problem cards of this matchup, he probably sided it out to prevent bricking on it and to increase his chance at drawing outs to the floodgates.
@@bornfromfire9379 Oh my bad, thought it could pop any card, thanks!
@@tommasopenati9635 If Steeds could pop any card, it would actually be OP
You aren’t wrong, steeds technically would help out here because you could Rei cl1 steeds cl2 to pop Rei so the banish effect of Rei resolves to remove it
@@alexrochaix8514 true!
Game 2 was painful. Like, bruh, 2-3x Imperm was right there. He could've used them to negate the backrow the moment Freki hit the field, but no...
You cannot negate the effects of a monster that is already being negated. (Directly. The intricate details of this ruling is slightly weird, but I'm just stating only the basic version of this). You cannot use Impermanence while Skill Drain is up, basically. You also cannot use imperm on a monster that has already been impermed, but you can initially target the same monster with imperm twice, but the last imperm on chain will *not* resolve.
@@halodragonmasterthe case with imperm is because it would do nothing if you activate it targeting a negated monster; and you cant activate a card that does nothing
@@halodragonmaster actually didn't know that. Learn something new every day.
I hate ritual beasts with a passion ever since the cannahawk loop days why is this deck alive
😅😅