I don't understand, although the explanation was simple and good. If I am "lost", but I have a landmark like the marsh, can't I just see where I am in the map? In other words, if I need an identifiable landmark and a map to triangulate on a compass, why do I need the compass? Thanks.
If you can see two or more landmarks, you might not need the compass. But if you only see one landmark, you don't know what side of the landmark you're on. And even if you do figure it out, and then head away from the landmark, you could get lost again, because we tend to wander in circles in the woods.
You'll probably find your location with one landmark with one condition where you know that you are in a linear features such as road or river. So, when you already know the bearing of your landmark, you can draw a line into your map until it intersect with the linear feature, to get a rough position of yourself...
If you can identify two landmarks on your map, surely you can identify where you are without the triangulation method. Right? It seems unnecessary. What am I missing here? If you can identify a nearby landmark that is on your map, you pretty much have it already, no? Another question: what if you cannot find landmarks but know you are somewhere on the map? Say you're in a dense forest with said map and compass and find that you are lost. You've been searching for landmarks and find nothing. What would you do? Thanks for any answers I am so distressed.
the explanation at 2.50 didn't make sense to me and ive watched it twice. so to summarize what i understood .... "point map north, then find a landmark, then draw a line from it on the map" I didn't understand what angle to draw the line at on the map. I'll watch it again.
Nikita Webber, use the compass, that is to say, your direction you are facing in relation to magnetic north ( aka your: "orientation" ) to determine 2 directions in relation to landmarks nearby you. They used the end of a marsh as one, and the direction they stood while looking toward it, and where two trails met, and the direction they were looking at while looking toward it. This gives you two landmarks. Each with a line of direction towards them as it relates to you, and to the numbers on the compass you rotated to face both north ( with the red needle ) and to face the direction you are looking to each landmark ( with the body of the compass plate. ) This gives you an "x-marks-the-spot" on the map; Which is where you stand, your orientation ( location and direction facing ) relation with the landmarks on the map!
Why did my P.E. Teacher assign this as an assignment 🤣what do we need to navigate while we are quarantined?
Bruh Ik
Idk why my pe teacher gave us this assignment
Joshyy Woshy bro same this ain’t pe related
same bro tell me the answer
bro same im doing it rn
I don't understand, although the explanation was simple and good. If I am "lost", but I have a landmark like the marsh, can't I just see where I am in the map? In other words, if I need an identifiable landmark and a map to triangulate on a compass, why do I need the compass? Thanks.
If you can see two or more landmarks, you might not need the compass. But if you only see one landmark, you don't know what side of the landmark you're on. And even if you do figure it out, and then head away from the landmark, you could get lost again, because we tend to wander in circles in the woods.
You'll probably find your location with one landmark with one condition where you know that you are in a linear features such as road or river. So, when you already know the bearing of your landmark, you can draw a line into your map until it intersect with the linear feature, to get a rough position of yourself...
Knowing you are next to a marsh is not nearly as actionable a piece of information as knowing which side of the marsh you are on.
If you can identify two landmarks on your map, surely you can identify where you are without the triangulation method. Right? It seems unnecessary. What am I missing here? If you can identify a nearby landmark that is on your map, you pretty much have it already, no? Another question: what if you cannot find landmarks but know you are somewhere on the map? Say you're in a dense forest with said map and compass and find that you are lost. You've been searching for landmarks and find nothing. What would you do? Thanks for any answers I am so distressed.
the explanation at 2.50 didn't make sense to me and ive watched it twice. so to summarize what i understood .... "point map north, then find a landmark, then draw a line from it on the map" I didn't understand what angle to draw the line at on the map. I'll watch it again.
Nikita Webber, use the compass, that is to say, your direction you are facing in relation to magnetic north ( aka your: "orientation" ) to determine 2 directions in relation to landmarks nearby you.
They used the end of a marsh as one, and the direction they stood while looking toward it, and where two trails met, and the direction they were looking at while looking toward it.
This gives you two landmarks. Each with a line of direction towards them as it relates to you, and to the numbers on the compass you rotated to face both north ( with the red needle ) and to face the direction you are looking to each landmark ( with the body of the compass plate. )
This gives you an "x-marks-the-spot" on the map; Which is where you stand, your orientation ( location and direction facing ) relation with the landmarks on the map!
I have orienteering tomorrow, wish me luck lmao
Did you do good
@@squirrel9760mf got lost and was never seen again
Maaam unhon pag reflection nan eni😭😭HAHAHAHAHAHHSHSH wa ako kasabut maam
deadline na silom hahaha. Makaya da sa how to build a fire . Pero ini lisud sabtun haha
Hi sa mga taga stc charowt
Is it normal that I find this process very complicated and not comprehensible in the first try?
Sa naka hkmo reflection pan hatagay HAHAHAHHA PM LANG HAHAHA
I would just ask the guy canoeing in the background where I am.
He/she/it might not know or they might not hear/see you, or all of the above.
THE SKILLZZZ
Ir. Ramos cakep s.sos team kab sinjai. 120,07,32 e05,15,14 siap orentering internasional
okkkkkkkkkkkk
no
La Neta No Entendi ni Madres ;-;
Wow, that wasn’t helpful at all. Can I get it mansplained please?