7.2 Rules of Implication II

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @brokenumbrella8789
    @brokenumbrella8789 5 років тому +11

    You are a lifesaver. It's nice to see other people from 4, 5, or 6 years ago who also valued your help. I'm sure someone will read this in the future and also think the same thing lol.

  • @rileyosborn2829
    @rileyosborn2829 9 років тому +10

    Thank you for everything! This is an immensely helpful tool for understanding logic. I cannot thank you enough for helping all of us who are struggling!

  • @pattyrabago6665
    @pattyrabago6665 8 років тому +3

    I could not pass my logic class without your videos. Thank you!!

  • @thinkinghard9117
    @thinkinghard9117 10 років тому +5

    You are a wonderful prof!!! Thank you so much for helping us. I think every logic prof should have to watch your videos to see how to teach. I always understand the material better when you present it. Thank you for saving our grades!! :)

  • @mmartel02
    @mmartel02 9 років тому +2

    You should do note taking software reviews. I haven't seen you use the same software twice.
    All joking aside, you managed to clear up the mess of an attempt my professor made at explaining this topic. Thanks for saving my GPA.

  • @notashleyg
    @notashleyg 4 роки тому

    Seriously so extremely helpful thank you so so much!!!!! I was struggling with proofs until I found your videos! THANK YOU!

  • @asirbbrisa
    @asirbbrisa 6 років тому +2

    Thank you for doing these videos they help me SO MUCH!

  • @adrianaleon8077
    @adrianaleon8077 8 років тому +1

    This is my last class... Im here to thank you, again, for all your help Professor THORSBY

    • @sevrinaanastasia
      @sevrinaanastasia 4 роки тому +1

      I know you posted a long time ago, but this is actually my last class needed to graduate too! :-)

  • @leannexum4274
    @leannexum4274 5 років тому

    these videos are GOLD

  • @lupeoseguera6077
    @lupeoseguera6077 8 років тому +1

    I SWEAR YOU SAVED MY ASS ON MY FINAL TODAY!!!!! ENDED GETTING A A THANK U!!#!!!

    • @metube2634
      @metube2634 3 роки тому

      Glad he saved your ass coz you look like you have a nice, sweet ass.

  • @therussianstevee
    @therussianstevee 7 років тому

    Regarding the rule of addition, do you have to have a single term isolated to add?
    For instance, if I had A v B, could I then use the rule of addition to say (A v B) v C?

  • @Nidomy
    @Nidomy 9 років тому

    For the constructive dilemna, CD, can we at first make two simplification of the first hypothsesis so that we get p implies q and r implies s and them bring them as hypothesis?

    • @PhilosophicalTechne
      @PhilosophicalTechne  9 років тому

      +Nidomy
      If I understand you corrected, the answer is yes.

    • @Nidomy
      @Nidomy 9 років тому

      Thanks for answering! I love your videos. It is like a university lesson.

  • @NinaPelina
    @NinaPelina 11 років тому

    so i just can add any value to B?
    for example my goal is ~P or R, i have ~Q or R on line 6, then i do my magic again and get ~P, can i just take R from line 6 and add it to ~P and that way get the answer i need?

  • @ingemseyes
    @ingemseyes 11 років тому

    thank you so much.. i hope my professor explain like you do :)

  • @francescopiazza4882
    @francescopiazza4882 4 роки тому

    Great lesson!

  • @RondoMeeker
    @RondoMeeker 11 років тому +1

    Can't you also simplify to q??

  • @massoud713
    @massoud713 9 років тому

    For ex.20, I did:
    6. D => B 2,3 HS
    7. M 4 simp
    8. M v N 7 add
    9. F => G 1,8 MP
    10. (D=>B) . (F=>G) 6, 9 conj
    11. B v G 5, 10 CD

  • @41Niners
    @41Niners 11 років тому

    you are a godsend

  • @ccbhr
    @ccbhr 10 років тому

    stay golden sir

  • @Strawberrycow22222
    @Strawberrycow22222 11 років тому

    Lifesaver!

  • @iLLsicilian
    @iLLsicilian 12 років тому

    thanks you helped me

  • @Zen-lz1hc
    @Zen-lz1hc 2 роки тому

    Like