Low affinity pawn ending * gotta go to hot tubs and high 5, talk to her, barber shops, cooking at camp, it all builds affinity up for a more emotional pawn speech
well true ending is the right thing (Spoilers alert) when u crall under the dragon and use the sword got u kill yourself and the world actually changes because you ended the loop kinda :)
@@sjakkooa lot of people missed so much of the side content that adds to the overall narrative, because the game just expects you to know to explore certain areas, talk to certain people etc. Without all of that, the game can be done VERY quickly
Apparently there are multiple endings. *SPOILER ALERT* On my last playthrough, my Pawn gave a more impassioned speech (because of our high affinity level). But once the dragon was downed, instead of villagers/townspeople rebuilding, I saw Sven take the throne of Vermund! Then, it ended with Captain Brant; and the Old Man Arisen sailing into the sea. So, apparently, the end-credit scenes change, depending on the quests you complete.
Oooooh. So that’s why entire “kingdoms” and “Empires” constitute less than 100 people. Because you can’t have useless characters. Everyone has to have a part to play. Neat explanation instead of just pulling a Skyrim and saying “THIS IS SKYRIMS LARGEST CITY” and it’s four homes and an ox.
Is anyone else confused after completing the ending what happened with the false arisen in place of yourself…. The queen that caused this madness… nothing ever gets covered and the captains you never talk to again after completing half the missions….
@@THIS-IS-Master-ChiefI think the issue is more that there are no quest markers so it's easy to just skip all that and get to the end without fully realizing it until it's too late.
You don't even have to play the game to learn the story. You only need to watch the playthrough in youtube to learn them. So it sounds like you want to be spoiled. I will grant your wish. False arisen is just some guy who pretended to be the real arisen. That guy called false arisen was never scratched by a dragon. He would just cut himself and use some kind of magical jewelry to fake being an arisen. He is just a guy who is taking credit for a work he did not even do.
I think theres going to be a continuation with dlc. Theres a reason it shows that old man again for the final scene. If you talk to him a few times at harve he eventually mentions a fake and true world and how we reside in the fake world. Its meant to be taken as like an old man with some wack crazy schizo conspiracy theorys, but I think theres some truth to what he says, other wise what would be the point in giving this unimportant throw away npc most people have never interacted with the final scene?
Spoiler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I don't know. I've got chills out of empty streets of cities that had been full of live for a long journey and it's cool to spy familiar faces in crowd while back in ruined castle.
@@THIS-IS-Master-Chief but there is barely time to explore it all and kill all the dragons, i didnt even get to upgrade any item to lvl 3 and use the wyrm crystals
@@ShuShuKing I rushed it too see the ending but as far as I can tell you have to do all the portals first without resting at a inn so you have more time, then once you get the final portal show up you don’t have a time limit anymore so you can fully explore
@@Grasspinks damn… I didn’t know. Somehow I killed all the bosses and got out without dying. Granted the stats said I only died 4 times in my playthrough. 3 of them were some dumb shit that I would revive and somehow got insta killed. 2 of the revives I got knocked off a cliff by the enemy as soon as I got up
So far, Dragon's Dogma 2 is another alternate universe which means what is equivalent to having Seneschal is Pathfinder. This is just like DD1 where the arisen must kill Seneschal. In DD2, the arisen must kill Pathfinder. In a way, they may not have shown if the arisen died killing Pathfinder or the arisen becoming a Pathfinder. DD2 does have post game after all because as shown, the arisen returns home and get welcomed back as Sovran. Then the arisen must interact with Pathfinder and that is where the Pathfinder keeps telling the arisen the journey is not over.
@@Wizard_PikachuI don’t think most people have actually finished it yet and they don’t get how the end game / Apocalypse map works - you better save up all your wake stones for it lol
Most likely keeping the Seneschal shrouded in mystery. I mean look at look at 34:06. The arisen did not even stab himself with a godsbane. This does not even look like a sacrifice. So true ending is shrouded in mystery because it does not prove if the arisen became the next pathfinder or the arisen being dead. I mean if you compare that to Savan in DD1, I am sure the reason why Savan would be missing in action all this time is because he became Seneschal. Pathfinder in DD2 has got to be equivalent to fighting Seneschal. So it might even be possible that the arisen in DD2 had became the next Pathfinder which means the arisen cannot come back to the human world. Pathfinder in DD2 would have to be equivalent to Seneschal. So I am sure if they don't even show what happened to the arisen who beaten Pathfinder, then that right there must of been what happened to Savan all this time.
Everyone is getting the black knight as love interest because it cost real money to manipulate the affinity system through giving gifts to NPCs. Yes the gifts are DLC.
@miahaminastop f of with this lies ! EVERYTHING available in the game for f free! Stop with this BST !!! You can buy rift crystals, art of methamorphis earn gold and just rent your pawn and you get 99.999999 rift crystals (I had max money, max crystals in Ddda) I hate you people Soo much !
I was really disappointed that the last thing you did was just climb up a dragon,even the fight with the dragon was underwhelming,they even took the part where the pawns rifts in behind you. I hope if a dlc expansion happens,it will after this bring back the Daimon and Senechal, and make the Senechal fight amazing and not just a pushover like in the last game,would be awesome if the Senechal's vocation and looks will be based on your previous Arisens
Holy moly DD is similar to FF1. Especially after FF1 Stranger of paradise. The cycle and wanting to break it and the villain purposely having a counterpart. The timeline being reset over and over. Interesting
So there's no fighting and replacing God? There's no post game with the moons nor the everfall? Even though this is they attempt at making the dragon's dogma they wanted fully, they wanted the moon tower to be the everfall and such, so that all still got scrapped? There has to be a second half to this like the first game! My hopium and copium is high right now, if this is all, then it is even less than the first games story! ._. oh no!
Im not going to buy the game full price since it has woke blsht but i want to find out if the story is as crazy as the first game, you know the dragon's dogma is the way to train the next successor of god.
@@declanmorden transsexual character set up, limited armor customization compared to the first game, limiting the high of the character to 1.60m, can't pass down that. Armor that were exclusive to women in the first game now men can use it.
Look at 34:06. The arisen did not even stab himself with a godsbane. This does not even look like a sacrifice. So true ending is shrouded in mystery because it does not prove if the arisen became the next pathfinder or the arisen being dead. I mean if you compare that to Savan in DD1, I am sure the reason why Savan would be missing in action all this time is because he became Seneschal. Pathfinder in DD2 has got to be equivalent to fighting Seneschal. So it might even be possible that the arisen in DD2 had became the next Pathfinder which means the arisen cannot come back to the human world.
Its strange, Perhaps it was the hype, or maybe iv jusg grown dull to gaming since we rarely get good gaming, but aftee playing and beating the game... Idk it feel kinda empty honestly, like we got what we were told, a full remake of the first game but that to me was what this felt like, a remake...with a lot of cut stuff from the 1st game with some things added
I played 10hrs a day since Friday and I only finished it 6 hours ago, guess you must’ve played 30 hrs straight without a break if you finished it on day of release
Lastly I finished the main story and still have a bunch of the map undiscovered + I know I missed a bunch of missions, if you’d actually finished the game you’d also know the whole map gets remade into a apocalypse version where you have crazy bosses everywhere and limited lives, how is that being left empty when you can run through the entire map again and it’s all different?
Honestly, just killing the dragon sucked for me cuz it was just killing the dragona dn celebrating but the fact that there's a bunch of endings here get me excited to replay and see them
Warning: Wall of Text. TLDR at the bottom. You know, everyone acts like the cycle is this horrible thing, that *must* be broken, but like... is it really that bad? In DD1 I would say yes absolutely, but in DD2, ehh, not so much. The cycle was much worse in Gransys than in Vermund & Battahl. Lemme explain. So in the first game right, as soon as Grigori (the dragon) dies, the whole world goes dark, monsters everywhere, the Everfall leaves a massive hole in Gran Soren, the Duke ages rapidly and wants you dead, pretty heinous all around. You *have to* plunge into the Everfall as its the only way to stop it all. You fight the Seneschal and stop the apocalyptic happenings in Granysys, become Seneschal, kill yourself, and "break the cycle." Your pawn gets your body, washes up in Cassardis, and assumedly lives the rest of their days as you, with your beloved. Good end for your pawn, not so much for you. And considering the Dragon - Arisen plight still exists in DD2, I guess our plan only worked for Gransys' cycle. Despite that, the "good"/true ending is the overall best when weighed against: 1) Take the dragons deal and your beloved dies, but you become Duke. 2) Take the Seneschal's deal, and live in an illusion and be unawares to that fact. Or 3) Die to the Seneschal and become a dragon. Out of all 4 the only traditionally "good" one would be taking the Seneschal's deal, the Seneschal does call it a "valid fate" to be fair, but then he basically calls you a coward for doing so as you (like many others) have basically chosen to run. And remember, at the end of the day its all an illusion as well. (Tbh its still the ending I choose every NG, I just wanna live happily with Quina, sorry Gransys.) The key here, is that the good ending and true ending are the *same* ending. They're intwined, can't have one without the other. In DD2 though, the (unnamed, basically inconsequential) Dragon dies, and you become Sovran. That's it. Thats the Good ending. No giant pits, no gods that have to be felled, none-so-much as a rainy cloud in the sky. Just a happy **non-illusory** life of regality. That doesn't really seem so bad, insofar as you're fine with a life of political intrigue. At the very least its none-so-bad as you and your pawn dying to "break a cycle" that probably remains unbroken anyway, or sacrificing your beloved or what-have-you. In DD1 the only way to become Duke was to sacrifice your beloved, DD2's standard "good" ending is that and more. Its the definition of having your cake and eating it too. Sure its not the "true ending" but its a much more preferable one, and in all honesty it seems the intended one. You get your throne back, you get a life of nobility, you get to save your beloved, you get to be a hero, you get to let the next great-willed Arisen schmuck deal with breaking an unbreakable cycle most common folk don't care about, and most of all, you *survive.* All things considered, everything comes up aces for us. There is 0 downsides other than letting the (very watered down compared to DD1's) cycle continue. Sure some houses may get burned by a dragon in the future, but as evidenced by Melve, most folk'll be fine and just move towns. And as mentioned before: the key here is that the good and true endings are *seperate* endings, completely independent of each other. TLDR: When comparing both game's "Good" endings, our Arisen from DD1 got a pretty raw deal compared to DD2's. And quite honestly I don't mind, I like a good happy ending.
Also when you go for the true ending the title changes from dragon's dogma to dragon's dogma 2, maybe itsuno wants to tell us something? 🤔 For me the fake ending were you kill the dragon is the worse because at the end of the day you would become like the old arisen that gives you the godsbane or worse than him, i remember poorly something he said like he was the king of the nation and even got to be the rouler of the world so maybe seneschal? And was always paranoid about the ending of the world but never got the guts to do what you are doing. And yeah comparing both cycles dd1 was wild
I think it's moreso that breaking the cycle in DD2's world means that there are no more Arisen nor are there dragons. It's a shame that we -- the players and devs -- can't afford to be there to bear witness to such a world, but it's the price we pay for "completing" the game in its truest sense: that when the Arisen (player) and the Dragon (devs) no longer have a story to write and read, the world must be consigned to being archived or reduced to oblivion. The true ending credits show a world that exists independently of the Arisen's and the Dragon's involvement, free from the Dogma that necessitates our involvement. The Unmoored World is still beholden to that Dogma that if something is in excess of what is written it must be destroyed, but the ending cutscenes imply now that everyone going forward can be allowed to exist independently of OUR (the players' and devs') involvement -- that it can be a world in a true sense that it simply exists with or without us to witness it. And when we hit that New Game button in the main menu, that world is being recreated for us to once again be put under the Dogma: a crafted experience of life and death for our own personal amusement. I do think that they could have written those themes a bit better if it was more meta (in a Nier sort of way) if they wanted to make the endings more impactful.
The mechanics in this game pushing me like a wind . they masterworks all you cant go wrong im enjoying the hell out of it while while learning that wolvs hunt in packs👍
@@thehandle711 He's not, it's the game's way of saying that the old man was in the same situation that you were. He succeeded in breaking the cycle but when it was time to kill the pathfinder he failed and the pathfinder banished him to another world. That's how he knows everything that's happened, because it happened to him.
@@mace8983 Yes! That is a better way to put it because that theory will make sense. That could be another way to say that old man was a former arisen. So in case anyone chooses a female arisen for DD2, then we can assume he is a seperate person. Same example as Sofiah being a former arisen in DD1. I mean Sofiah have a better understanding of a cycle too. Sofiah in DD1 had killed her dragon but did not face Seneschal. After all, if the arisen gets killed right in front of Seneschal, that arisen become a dragon. So we could assume that in theory, maybe when Savan defeated his Seneschal, Sofiah must of committed suicide herself. Sofiah must of entered that realm same time as Savan so that way if she committed suicide, it won't count as her being defeated by Seneschal when choosing peaceful life. After all, main pawns cannot enter the realm of peaceful ending. So she may of had to commit suicide while Savan was facing his Seneschal.
I think the Pathfinder is an ascended Arisen just like Seneschal. This one tho is a megalomaniac, clinging to the power he has and want the cycle to continue forever.
Pathfinder is equivalent to Seneschal. So in a way, you see it like this Different world different cycle. So far, Pathfinder is a final boss just as Seneschal was a final boss. What is different is Pathfinder was in a dragon form and Seneschal wasn't. When you met Pathfinder from the start and middle, he wasn't in dragon form but in the final fight, Pathfinder is in dragon form.
@@ezra5907 yea there’s loads + stack up on ferry stones while you’re there, i finished the game yesterday because I wanted too see the ending but now I just want to get back to the apocalypse so I can explore it fully
So DD2 is just a rehash of the first game and they didn't even change the shitty endings? There is no way for your character to live happily ever after and end the dragon threat? And before anyone comes after me for spoiling myself on the game, I just saved myself $100+ in my currency because I would have been furious to buy the game only to hate the ending enough to ruin the rest of the experience. Why would I want to start a new character knowing their only outcome was death? Why would I bother building character relationships if my character is basically just walking story fodder? Simply put, I wouldn't.
A happy ending would completely negate the entire point of Dragon's Dogma's Schopenhaueristic philosophy with the twist that the strongest humans fill in for the godless world, but as human continually need to be replaced in an endless cycle and we simply can't escape that. Death is inevitable.
@@bc9866 Idk about you but I prefer to play games that make me happy, not remind me of the inevitability of death and the fact that I basically wasted my time trying because my character dies anyways, and from the first game I can tell you that there isn't a single character worth sacrificing for (unlike ME3 where I hate the ending because of this same problem but being able to save all the other characters I care about at the same time makes it worth it). So the character writing, animation and voice acting will have to be absolutely phenomenal to make any side characters or companions worth the sacrifice and from what I've seen of everything outside of combat that's very much NOT what you get despite the ridiculously high price tag attached to it. I'd rather just play BG3 again.
@@PhantomAuthor I like games that make me think. I don't really enjoy being told everything is going to be okay if it makes zero sense for the story. Too many games, including BG3 hamfist plot devices or irrational character behavior to create at least a somewhat happy ending. I don't like deus ex machinas and I feel like they insult my intelligence just to make me feel happy for fictional characters that I'm designed to be parasocially attached to. I guess I feel this way because I view a lot of media through a doylist
What? The two endings you're most likely to get both include you living happily ever after. The only one where you get even kind of shafted is the secret ending, and that's very much by your own choice. The two obvious endings are literally you going home and living the rest of your life as a king, having slain the Dragon. The cycle will repeat, but your character's life was idyllic, and it's the best choice for the continuation of humanity by a longshot. The secret ending is basically destroying the world to solve a problem the world didn't need solved, and for what? Because the Dragon thought the cycle was bullshit? It's whatever.
Look at 34:06. The arisen did not even stab himself with a godsbane. This does not even look like a sacrifice. So true ending is shrouded in mystery because it does not prove if the arisen became the next pathfinder or the arisen being dead. I mean if you compare that to Savan in DD1, I am sure the reason why Savan would be missing in action all this time is because he became Seneschal. Pathfinder in DD2 has got to be equivalent to fighting Seneschal. So it might even be possible that the arisen in DD2 had became the next Pathfinder which means the arisen cannot come back to the human world.
концовки кал. разве что очнутся в хате рыбака норм. 1 догма делала это в разы лучше. жаль что с наративом тут беда еще хуже чем у игрв 12 летней давности. ну хоть геймплей тащит
The first game had that but then it is revealed that this was only 3 thirds of the games story and the rest was at the everfall and fighting god. So let's hope this is still the case
There is a post game after the dragon apparently that’s very big? I’m ASSUMING it’s the apocalypse world from 1 but I can’t see anyone post anything on it. Some articles briefly mentioned how to unlock it (specific ending and then specific things after the ending) but haven’t seen it yet.
I got the fake ending and i honestly thought that was it until i watched the true, however! I am still confused on the post credit scene, I’m assuming that was to be a hint the Arison is still alive/DLC?
I guess they don't want to show the rest which means maybe the arisen became the next Pathfinder. In this game, what is equivalent to fighting Seneschal is fighting Pathfinder. So in a way, this must of been exactly what happened to Savan in DD1. I mean people will have to eventually realize that Savan is missing in action. Remember what happened to Savan. He was alive but ended up living long enough to become Seneschal.
I got the supposed "fake ending" as well. I thought I did well. I killed the dragon, I am the king, and the throne room was filled with happy people cheering for me.
@@Grimalken1969 Just like in DD1, fake ending would mean the arisen goes back living a peaceful life as a fisherman. In DD2, the fake ending is where the arisen goes back to the throne ruling as soveran. So by comparing both Dragon's Dogma, they don't want a real ending where the arisen slays a dragon only to rule as king/queen. They never made a real ending where arisen fights for the throne. For DD2, since the arisen was already a soveran, the arisen never actually did it for the throne. People just happened to welcome him/her.
Low affinity pawn ending * gotta go to hot tubs and high 5, talk to her, barber shops, cooking at camp, it all builds affinity up for a more emotional pawn speech
the dragon at the true ending looked like some seriously metal version of Grigori
I got to the dude summoning the other dragon and I thought I was like 30% done with the game lol.
well true ending is the right thing (Spoilers alert)
when u crall under the dragon and use the sword got u kill yourself and the world actually changes because you ended the loop kinda :)
i know i flew threw this kinda dissapointing hopefully dlc somewhat soon
Same here
same this game is wayyyy to short
@@sjakkooa lot of people missed so much of the side content that adds to the overall narrative, because the game just expects you to know to explore certain areas, talk to certain people etc.
Without all of that, the game can be done VERY quickly
That final song 😭 Idk why it hits the feels
you are missing one ending where you save everyone and you see them building and living again
Apparently there are multiple endings. *SPOILER ALERT* On my last playthrough, my Pawn gave a more impassioned speech (because of our high affinity level). But once the dragon was downed, instead of villagers/townspeople rebuilding, I saw Sven take the throne of Vermund! Then, it ended with Captain Brant; and the Old Man Arisen sailing into the sea. So, apparently, the end-credit scenes change, depending on the quests you complete.
Oooooh. So that’s why entire “kingdoms” and “Empires” constitute less than 100 people. Because you can’t have useless characters. Everyone has to have a part to play. Neat explanation instead of just pulling a Skyrim and saying “THIS IS SKYRIMS LARGEST CITY” and it’s four homes and an ox.
Is anyone else confused after completing the ending what happened with the false arisen in place of yourself…. The queen that caused this madness… nothing ever gets covered and the captains you never talk to again after completing half the missions….
You’ve not finished it yourself yet have you
@@THIS-IS-Master-ChiefI think the issue is more that there are no quest markers so it's easy to just skip all that and get to the end without fully realizing it until it's too late.
Lmao it's crazy how many people are complaining without actually having played the game and only based on hearsay or cutscene compilations on youtube
You don't even have to play the game to learn the story. You only need to watch the playthrough in youtube to learn them. So it sounds like you want to be spoiled. I will grant your wish. False arisen is just some guy who pretended to be the real arisen. That guy called false arisen was never scratched by a dragon. He would just cut himself and use some kind of magical jewelry to fake being an arisen. He is just a guy who is taking credit for a work he did not even do.
They Talk about It in the post Game Lil bro
When you fall from the dragon into the water I can hear the grave mind from halo 2 saying "This is not your Grave, but you are welcome in it"
pro tip : you do'nt have to fight phaesus minions, if you go straight up for the stairs it'll trigger the next scene and avoit you a fight.
I really think there has to be something secret that lets you fight a true final boss or something.. true ending was so unticlimactic
I think theres going to be a continuation with dlc. Theres a reason it shows that old man again for the final scene. If you talk to him a few times at harve he eventually mentions a fake and true world and how we reside in the fake world. Its meant to be taken as like an old man with some wack crazy schizo conspiracy theorys, but I think theres some truth to what he says, other wise what would be the point in giving this unimportant throw away npc most people have never interacted with the final scene?
Spoiler
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I don't know. I've got chills out of empty streets of cities that had been full of live for a long journey and it's cool to spy familiar faces in crowd while back in ruined castle.
Me when I didn't play the game
True ending was peak.
@@RIP2UALL peak my ass
This is likely them ending or starting to end the series, at least if that last one is the true ending, truly breaking the cycle
You are very Quick for these ending frfr
His ending feels like "killing a god" whithout doing it. But I guess, dragon are similar to gods in this world.
Wtf are these endings dawg? The 1st game had a far superior batshit insane ending
Nah actually play the game, this doesn’t show off the apocalypse version of the map at all it’s been edited out this vid
@@THIS-IS-Master-Chief i was hoping the post game was as good as dragons dogma 1.
@@retrovoid3301 yeah it is, we get a whole re work of the entire map
@@THIS-IS-Master-Chief but there is barely time to explore it all and kill all the dragons, i didnt even get to upgrade any item to lvl 3 and use the wyrm crystals
@@ShuShuKing I rushed it too see the ending but as far as I can tell you have to do all the portals first without resting at a inn so you have more time, then once you get the final portal show up you don’t have a time limit anymore so you can fully explore
So that's it..? Some of the best content from DD1 was it's true ending
7:09 where was this dullahan and why did him killing you end the game?
Any death in endgame causes that ending
@@Grasspinks damn… I didn’t know. Somehow I killed all the bosses and got out without dying. Granted the stats said I only died 4 times in my playthrough. 3 of them were some dumb shit that I would revive and somehow got insta killed. 2 of the revives I got knocked off a cliff by the enemy as soon as I got up
No Everfall, or Seneschal fight? Guess I’ll wait for Dark Arisen 2.0.
Please god give us the seneschal
So far, Dragon's Dogma 2 is another alternate universe which means what is equivalent to having Seneschal is Pathfinder. This is just like DD1 where the arisen must kill Seneschal. In DD2, the arisen must kill Pathfinder. In a way, they may not have shown if the arisen died killing Pathfinder or the arisen becoming a Pathfinder.
DD2 does have post game after all because as shown, the arisen returns home and get welcomed back as Sovran. Then the arisen must interact with Pathfinder and that is where the Pathfinder keeps telling the arisen the journey is not over.
...we ended the seneschal reign in dd1 bro... Do you not remember? There is no seneschal anymore. DD2 just is another universe
@@jinji_xo Okay, but no Everfall is still lame.
if the leaks are true, it'll be dragon princess
so best out come is....not attackin the dragon, since there is no real point to do so
where is the senechal ending?
In DD1, and this world's seneschal actually did some insane shit
@@Wizard_PikachuI don’t think most people have actually finished it yet and they don’t get how the end game / Apocalypse map works - you better save up all your wake stones for it lol
Most likely keeping the Seneschal shrouded in mystery. I mean look at look at 34:06. The arisen did not even stab himself with a godsbane. This does not even look like a sacrifice. So true ending is shrouded in mystery because it does not prove if the arisen became the next pathfinder or the arisen being dead. I mean if you compare that to Savan in DD1, I am sure the reason why Savan would be missing in action all this time is because he became Seneschal. Pathfinder in DD2 has got to be equivalent to fighting Seneschal. So it might even be possible that the arisen in DD2 had became the next Pathfinder which means the arisen cannot come back to the human world. Pathfinder in DD2 would have to be equivalent to Seneschal. So I am sure if they don't even show what happened to the arisen who beaten Pathfinder, then that right there must of been what happened to Savan all this time.
You can *FEEL* they are close to making a good fight/ending.
Let's hope updates or dlc will make it work.
Can you continue playing after the ending? Like can you roam around the world after the end credits? Or does it just end and new game plus only after?
You can load from the last saved inn unless you let the credits roll entirely, then you have to start a NG plus run
You can continue playing after the segway into the true ending, since the whole world is now changed
Did you chose the black knight as love or the game romance system its the same rng as first game?
Everyone is getting the black knight as love interest because it cost real money to manipulate the affinity system through giving gifts to NPCs. Yes the gifts are DLC.
@@miahaminaevno they aren’t
@miahaminastop f of with this lies ! EVERYTHING available in the game for f free! Stop with this BST !!! You can buy rift crystals, art of methamorphis earn gold and just rent your pawn and you get 99.999999 rift crystals (I had max money, max crystals in Ddda) I hate you people Soo much !
@@phantomjoker5499it's crazy how people just come online and lie for no reason.
@@miahaminaev 😑 you just made that up wtf. Legit misinformation
im trying to use dragon plague to kill everyone to see if it changes the ending
At least the post-game was much better and more full in this game than dd1
I was really disappointed that the last thing you did was just climb up a dragon,even the fight with the dragon was underwhelming,they even took the part where the pawns rifts in behind you. I hope if a dlc expansion happens,it will after this bring back the Daimon and Senechal, and make the Senechal fight amazing and not just a pushover like in the last game,would be awesome if the Senechal's vocation and looks will be based on your previous Arisens
Holy moly DD is similar to FF1. Especially after FF1 Stranger of paradise. The cycle and wanting to break it and the villain purposely having a counterpart. The timeline being reset over and over. Interesting
where did you get your armor and head gear?
fo the thief enshadowed and hood
So in the end it was Dragons Dogma Demake
So there's no fighting and replacing God? There's no post game with the moons nor the everfall? Even though this is they attempt at making the dragon's dogma they wanted fully, they wanted the moon tower to be the everfall and such, so that all still got scrapped? There has to be a second half to this like the first game! My hopium and copium is high right now, if this is all, then it is even less than the first games story! ._. oh no!
Why don't you go play the game and find out?
What are you doing here spoiling yourself?
Because I want to spoil myself and see if it is like the first games crazy story... what's it to you? 🤨
Im not going to buy the game full price since it has woke blsht but i want to find out if the story is as crazy as the first game, you know the dragon's dogma is the way to train the next successor of god.
@@AnotherGamingDudelmao how the fuck does DD2 have “woke bullshit”
@@declanmorden transsexual character set up, limited armor customization compared to the first game, limiting the high of the character to 1.60m, can't pass down that. Armor that were exclusive to women in the first game now men can use it.
Wait, so ANOTHER true ending that involves the main character dying?
Goddamnit, couldn't they change things up for the sequel?
Look at 34:06. The arisen did not even stab himself with a godsbane. This does not even look like a sacrifice. So true ending is shrouded in mystery because it does not prove if the arisen became the next pathfinder or the arisen being dead. I mean if you compare that to Savan in DD1, I am sure the reason why Savan would be missing in action all this time is because he became Seneschal. Pathfinder in DD2 has got to be equivalent to fighting Seneschal. So it might even be possible that the arisen in DD2 had became the next Pathfinder which means the arisen cannot come back to the human world.
Its strange, Perhaps it was the hype, or maybe iv jusg grown dull to gaming since we rarely get good gaming, but aftee playing and beating the game...
Idk it feel kinda empty honestly, like we got what we were told, a full remake of the first game but that to me was what this felt like, a remake...with a lot of cut stuff from the 1st game with some things added
It's not you the game is mid
Game is definitely overrated and overhyped. And the developers shitting the bed with endings yet again.
You beat the game 2 days ago? It’s only been out since Friday, I’ve actually finished it earlier today and it’s insanely good idk what you’re on about
I played 10hrs a day since Friday and I only finished it 6 hours ago, guess you must’ve played 30 hrs straight without a break if you finished it on day of release
Lastly I finished the main story and still have a bunch of the map undiscovered + I know I missed a bunch of missions, if you’d actually finished the game you’d also know the whole map gets remade into a apocalypse version where you have crazy bosses everywhere and limited lives, how is that being left empty when you can run through the entire map again and it’s all different?
Honestly, just killing the dragon sucked for me cuz it was just killing the dragona dn celebrating but the fact that there's a bunch of endings here get me excited to replay and see them
so this was the true vision of dragon dogma... anyway sure theres gonna be an expansion.
Warning: Wall of Text. TLDR at the bottom.
You know, everyone acts like the cycle is this horrible thing, that *must* be broken, but like... is it really that bad? In DD1 I would say yes absolutely, but in DD2, ehh, not so much. The cycle was much worse in Gransys than in Vermund & Battahl. Lemme explain.
So in the first game right, as soon as Grigori (the dragon) dies, the whole world goes dark, monsters everywhere, the Everfall leaves a massive hole in Gran Soren, the Duke ages rapidly and wants you dead, pretty heinous all around. You *have to* plunge into the Everfall as its the only way to stop it all. You fight the Seneschal and stop the apocalyptic happenings in Granysys, become Seneschal, kill yourself, and "break the cycle." Your pawn gets your body, washes up in Cassardis, and assumedly lives the rest of their days as you, with your beloved. Good end for your pawn, not so much for you. And considering the Dragon - Arisen plight still exists in DD2, I guess our plan only worked for Gransys' cycle.
Despite that, the "good"/true ending is the overall best when weighed against: 1) Take the dragons deal and your beloved dies, but you become Duke. 2) Take the Seneschal's deal, and live in an illusion and be unawares to that fact. Or 3) Die to the Seneschal and become a dragon. Out of all 4 the only traditionally "good" one would be taking the Seneschal's deal, the Seneschal does call it a "valid fate" to be fair, but then he basically calls you a coward for doing so as you (like many others) have basically chosen to run. And remember, at the end of the day its all an illusion as well. (Tbh its still the ending I choose every NG, I just wanna live happily with Quina, sorry Gransys.)
The key here, is that the good ending and true ending are the *same* ending. They're intwined, can't have one without the other.
In DD2 though, the (unnamed, basically inconsequential) Dragon dies, and you become Sovran. That's it. Thats the Good ending. No giant pits, no gods that have to be felled, none-so-much as a rainy cloud in the sky. Just a happy **non-illusory** life of regality. That doesn't really seem so bad, insofar as you're fine with a life of political intrigue. At the very least its none-so-bad as you and your pawn dying to "break a cycle" that probably remains unbroken anyway, or sacrificing your beloved or what-have-you.
In DD1 the only way to become Duke was to sacrifice your beloved, DD2's standard "good" ending is that and more. Its the definition of having your cake and eating it too. Sure its not the "true ending" but its a much more preferable one, and in all honesty it seems the intended one. You get your throne back, you get a life of nobility, you get to save your beloved, you get to be a hero, you get to let the next great-willed Arisen schmuck deal with breaking an unbreakable cycle most common folk don't care about, and most of all, you *survive.*
All things considered, everything comes up aces for us. There is 0 downsides other than letting the (very watered down compared to DD1's) cycle continue. Sure some houses may get burned by a dragon in the future, but as evidenced by Melve, most folk'll be fine and just move towns.
And as mentioned before: the key here is that the good and true endings are *seperate* endings, completely independent of each other.
TLDR: When comparing both game's "Good" endings, our Arisen from DD1 got a pretty raw deal compared to DD2's. And quite honestly I don't mind, I like a good happy ending.
Also when you go for the true ending the title changes from dragon's dogma to dragon's dogma 2, maybe itsuno wants to tell us something? 🤔
For me the fake ending were you kill the dragon is the worse because at the end of the day you would become like the old arisen that gives you the godsbane or worse than him, i remember poorly something he said like he was the king of the nation and even got to be the rouler of the world so maybe seneschal? And was always paranoid about the ending of the world but never got the guts to do what you are doing.
And yeah comparing both cycles dd1 was wild
I think it's moreso that breaking the cycle in DD2's world means that there are no more Arisen nor are there dragons. It's a shame that we -- the players and devs -- can't afford to be there to bear witness to such a world, but it's the price we pay for "completing" the game in its truest sense: that when the Arisen (player) and the Dragon (devs) no longer have a story to write and read, the world must be consigned to being archived or reduced to oblivion.
The true ending credits show a world that exists independently of the Arisen's and the Dragon's involvement, free from the Dogma that necessitates our involvement. The Unmoored World is still beholden to that Dogma that if something is in excess of what is written it must be destroyed, but the ending cutscenes imply now that everyone going forward can be allowed to exist independently of OUR (the players' and devs') involvement -- that it can be a world in a true sense that it simply exists with or without us to witness it. And when we hit that New Game button in the main menu, that world is being recreated for us to once again be put under the Dogma: a crafted experience of life and death for our own personal amusement.
I do think that they could have written those themes a bit better if it was more meta (in a Nier sort of way) if they wanted to make the endings more impactful.
Lmao i got brant my first ending too, think its cause i bought too many rounds at the pub 😂
Not good enough, we need a DLC next
I just want some new Armors
oh man I got the fake ending now I know why the game gives 4 or 3 notification if you want new game+
10:15 is that the default arisen or is a custom you made?
Waiting for Dragon's Dogma 2 "Dark Arisen"
That is some INSANE combat right there👌
The mechanics in this game pushing me like a wind . they masterworks all you cant go wrong im enjoying the hell out of it while while learning that wolvs hunt in packs👍
@@stampiboy1Dont forget "Careful not to get soaked Arisen" when entering ankle deep water
@@khadelsnerdo 👨🏾🦲hello hello fellow arisen ✊looking at you weirdly in Gran soren
Bro... your ending slides?
So if you die in the unmoored world, you become the old man in Harve village? I didnt get that part
You don't become him. You always have been him. He is you.
If that is your theory, then what if the arisen were a female in DD2? Then how will that female arisen turn into an old man?
@@thehandle711 He's not, it's the game's way of saying that the old man was in the same situation that you were. He succeeded in breaking the cycle but when it was time to kill the pathfinder he failed and the pathfinder banished him to another world. That's how he knows everything that's happened, because it happened to him.
@@mace8983 Yes! That is a better way to put it because that theory will make sense. That could be another way to say that old man was a former arisen. So in case anyone chooses a female arisen for DD2, then we can assume he is a seperate person. Same example as Sofiah being a former arisen in DD1. I mean Sofiah have a better understanding of a cycle too. Sofiah in DD1 had killed her dragon but did not face Seneschal. After all, if the arisen gets killed right in front of Seneschal, that arisen become a dragon. So we could assume that in theory, maybe when Savan defeated his Seneschal, Sofiah must of committed suicide herself. Sofiah must of entered that realm same time as Savan so that way if she committed suicide, it won't count as her being defeated by Seneschal when choosing peaceful life. After all, main pawns cannot enter the realm of peaceful ending. So she may of had to commit suicide while Savan was facing his Seneschal.
The game just came out how u so fast 😭
Been out for a bit in New Zealand. The grind never stops :D
Just got the true ending, like he said the grind never stops
i still don't get who the pathfinder is and why hes doing what hes doing
I think the Pathfinder is an ascended Arisen just like Seneschal. This one tho is a megalomaniac, clinging to the power he has and want the cycle to continue forever.
I think he is way higher than seneschal
Pathfinder is equivalent to Seneschal. So in a way, you see it like this Different world different cycle. So far, Pathfinder is a final boss just as Seneschal was a final boss. What is different is Pathfinder was in a dragon form and Seneschal wasn't. When you met Pathfinder from the start and middle, he wasn't in dragon form but in the final fight, Pathfinder is in dragon form.
@@hp2546 pathfinder is god
@@hp2546 the ghost beastren is the seneschal
so confused... wish they had better ideas given for choices smfh
How do I get out of unmoored world ?
Finish the game, hope you saved some wakestones
@@THIS-IS-Master-Chiefyou collect hella wakestones in unmoored no worries
@@ezra5907 yea there’s loads + stack up on ferry stones while you’re there, i finished the game yesterday because I wanted too see the ending but now I just want to get back to the apocalypse so I can explore it fully
Those are me trash ending thanks
Broooo I wasted 50 hours of my life for these ending??? Naaaahhhh
38:00
Wuh Kuhndah!!!
So DD2 is just a rehash of the first game and they didn't even change the shitty endings? There is no way for your character to live happily ever after and end the dragon threat?
And before anyone comes after me for spoiling myself on the game, I just saved myself $100+ in my currency because I would have been furious to buy the game only to hate the ending enough to ruin the rest of the experience. Why would I want to start a new character knowing their only outcome was death? Why would I bother building character relationships if my character is basically just walking story fodder? Simply put, I wouldn't.
A happy ending would completely negate the entire point of Dragon's Dogma's Schopenhaueristic philosophy with the twist that the strongest humans fill in for the godless world, but as human continually need to be replaced in an endless cycle and we simply can't escape that. Death is inevitable.
@@bc9866 Idk about you but I prefer to play games that make me happy, not remind me of the inevitability of death and the fact that I basically wasted my time trying because my character dies anyways, and from the first game I can tell you that there isn't a single character worth sacrificing for (unlike ME3 where I hate the ending because of this same problem but being able to save all the other characters I care about at the same time makes it worth it).
So the character writing, animation and voice acting will have to be absolutely phenomenal to make any side characters or companions worth the sacrifice and from what I've seen of everything outside of combat that's very much NOT what you get despite the ridiculously high price tag attached to it. I'd rather just play BG3 again.
@@PhantomAuthor I like games that make me think. I don't really enjoy being told everything is going to be okay if it makes zero sense for the story. Too many games, including BG3 hamfist plot devices or irrational character behavior to create at least a somewhat happy ending. I don't like deus ex machinas and I feel like they insult my intelligence just to make me feel happy for fictional characters that I'm designed to be parasocially attached to.
I guess I feel this way because I view a lot of media through a doylist
What? The two endings you're most likely to get both include you living happily ever after. The only one where you get even kind of shafted is the secret ending, and that's very much by your own choice. The two obvious endings are literally you going home and living the rest of your life as a king, having slain the Dragon. The cycle will repeat, but your character's life was idyllic, and it's the best choice for the continuation of humanity by a longshot. The secret ending is basically destroying the world to solve a problem the world didn't need solved, and for what? Because the Dragon thought the cycle was bullshit? It's whatever.
Look at 34:06. The arisen did not even stab himself with a godsbane. This does not even look like a sacrifice. So true ending is shrouded in mystery because it does not prove if the arisen became the next pathfinder or the arisen being dead. I mean if you compare that to Savan in DD1, I am sure the reason why Savan would be missing in action all this time is because he became Seneschal. Pathfinder in DD2 has got to be equivalent to fighting Seneschal. So it might even be possible that the arisen in DD2 had became the next Pathfinder which means the arisen cannot come back to the human world.
The last is gay ending. 😂LMAO
концовки кал. разве что очнутся в хате рыбака норм. 1 догма делала это в разы лучше. жаль что с наративом тут беда еще хуже чем у игрв 12 летней давности. ну хоть геймплей тащит
Mc dies = automatic trash game
Guess Dragons Dogma 1 is trash then
Hear that? Persona 3, Red Dead Redemption, InFamous 2, Halo: Reach, Asura’s Wrath, Fallout 3 and NieR: Automata are all automatically trash everyone.
@@nicodemusedwards6931
Absolutely worthless and the people who enjoyed them should be ashamed! 🤡
every single final fantasy game = main characters die. kek@@nicodemusedwards6931
@@nicodemusedwards6931LA Noire.
Joel in TLOU2.
What's the true ending? The world fucking ends?
Don't tell me it has the piece of shit ending as the first game
The first game had that but then it is revealed that this was only 3 thirds of the games story and the rest was at the everfall and fighting god. So let's hope this is still the case
@@DANCERcownope that it.
There is a post game after the dragon apparently that’s very big?
I’m ASSUMING it’s the apocalypse world from 1 but I can’t see anyone post anything on it. Some articles briefly mentioned how to unlock it (specific ending and then specific things after the ending) but haven’t seen it yet.
@@wr5488 that's not post-game, that's how you get the true ending starting.
dude holy shit it’s a fake out you get sent to an otherworld version of the area
I got the fake ending and i honestly thought that was it until i watched the true, however! I am still confused on the post credit scene, I’m assuming that was to be a hint the Arison is still alive/DLC?
I guess they don't want to show the rest which means maybe the arisen became the next Pathfinder. In this game, what is equivalent to fighting Seneschal is fighting Pathfinder. So in a way, this must of been exactly what happened to Savan in DD1. I mean people will have to eventually realize that Savan is missing in action. Remember what happened to Savan. He was alive but ended up living long enough to become Seneschal.
I got the supposed "fake ending" as well. I thought I did well. I killed the dragon, I am the king, and the throne room was filled with happy people cheering for me.
@@Grimalken1969 Just like in DD1, fake ending would mean the arisen goes back living a peaceful life as a fisherman. In DD2, the fake ending is where the arisen goes back to the throne ruling as soveran. So by comparing both Dragon's Dogma, they don't want a real ending where the arisen slays a dragon only to rule as king/queen. They never made a real ending where arisen fights for the throne. For DD2, since the arisen was already a soveran, the arisen never actually did it for the throne. People just happened to welcome him/her.