The Patriarchy: a feminist ghost story. Whenever a man succeeds, it is patriarchy. Whenever a man fails, it is because of patriarchy. Whenever a woman fails, it is because of patriarchy. Whenever a woman discovers feminist inaccuracies, it is internalised misogyny. *But* when women are elevated structurally, societally *everywhere* in employment, education, social life, courts, largely from male tax money.... *THAT'S* not Patriarchy. That's a woman's natural strength. 💪
artificially elevated. if they could take all of this on their own, they would have been the rulers long ago. they always need someone to hand it to them
Wanna know something interesting? They don't care that its makes no sense, they will lie in your face. It is about power, we should stop using their language, because it is not true, and only works to push their ideology.
@@thefool8224 Women empowerment, free and independent is basically just reparations for imagined crimes against them. It boils down to women empowerment being "gibs"
Protection of women = "putting women in a subordinate position" You don't protect someone or something you consider less valuable. The level of resentment needed to see it this way is telling.
Well, the Ts will do to wmn exactly what the Feminists did/do to men. Rotation of the proletariat - each time they install a new class in the hierarchy above the existing ones
It makes me so mad that these feminists completely disregard the significance of motherhood. Mothers are the MOST fundamental part of any civilization. Mothers and their children are the REASON men create civilizations and technology and art in the first place!! To say motherhood is historically insignificant is to be completely divorced from reality
I feel like if women didn’t bear children and continue the human race, men would have gotten rid of us long ago lol. Though many of them seem to really much prefer the touch of a woman. It’s why I believe sexual preference isn’t a choice.
It used to be families that ruled - that included the women within those families. Schrodinger's Feminism - where women are empowered and oppressed at exactly the same time!
Superposition is a model of quantum phenomena that describes what we cannot fully understand. The only observed superposition of mutually exclusive states is found in the mind of women.
My dad died 4 years ago. According to the left I shouldn't feel a continuous missing and grieving for him. I really hate these freakshow circus people.
@bongland greg Man, my heart goes out to you. I can hardly imagine, and I really fear to. Unironically, one of the most comforting things about Christianity is the assurance that we will meet again soon. It's gotten me through burying more loved ones than I care to count.
More capable fathers have lost out custody battles on numerous occasions purely because they are men in fact men are still by and large regarded as 2nd class citizens when it comes to raising their own children
The workplaces as well if a female coworker does not like you, she just has to make a claim that you said something sexual to them, and you will be fired without any proper investigation.
Hey. A father straight up gave he finger to his country's government. By changing his gender from male to female. All so he could protect his children and give them a better chance at life. Yet, the legal system always was bias towards women. In turn, he figured a legal loophole and gained custody of his children. FYI: This pissed off the weirdos on the Left. All because this guy used the system against itself. And won. And I should correct myself. Said "Father" is now Mother. So SHE is with HER children now away from that woman SHE was partners to. (I am being sarcastic here...)
That's so true, The woman if she leaves the man voluntarily without any kinds of threats of violence etc more than likely you would be worse for her to raise the The inability to compromise on conditions is more likely to screw up the kids than anything else.
@@celestial962420 I was in a cafeteria with colleagues, in earshot of the men. I made the mistake of calling a group of hen-pecking women out on their open sexism. The accusations began immediately and before I knew it, I was blackballed from my job because a bunch of women had stood up in solidarity to a misogynist who was creating an "unsafe" work environment where they felt threatened by my attitude. Seriously, you have to be really careful, because the way women will portray and curate a situation to favourably position themselves at your expense, is masterful. There's a lost book out there, Tsun Tzus Wife's art of war against men.
In Japan, it is entirely normal for the man to work 50-60+ hour weeks, come home and turn over every yen he makes to the wife. He is then allocated an allowance usually between 50-100 pounds for the month. But seriously, guys, Japan is absolutely at the bottom of the gender equity rankings - the WEF told me so.
Reminds me of a video I saw in which a Japanese politician visits the US during the late 19th century and thinks it weird how subservient men are to women. Holding the door for them, buying them expensive stuff, fighting for them etc.
The west has been better to women for a long time due to the west being a guilt based, nuclear family oriented society compared to the east which is shame and clan based.
The only conclusion I can ever come to is: if you want equal rights you deserve equal fights. If you refuse equal fights, but still demand equal rights, you should be laughed at and ridiculed.
Women and men just operate on such a different level. I’ve noticed men are much more hands on and like to get physical to gauge the situation. Women aren’t like that. And pregnant women really can’t be like that so… Not sure how we can make things “equal” since men and women are so different.
@@umiluv You've hit upon the perennial difficulty, In a healthy society I don't think we would want to be the same, we would respect the difference and value each other.
“Men keep women in a state of dependence” Is another way of saying men have done everything, do everything and will continue to do everything to look after women. Sounds a bit ungrateful to me.
@@TheGreenKnight500 the only thing men are dependent on women for is reproduction. They can do everything else easily, by themselves. Millions of men exist their entire lives alone, the only woman ever caring for them was their own mother. Millions of men are dragged down and prevented from reaching their potential because of the female they are stuck with, like an albatross around their neck. I am the latter, and until I was 46 I was indentured to one to the point I am only now at 53 starting to be able to save money and get ahead. Where I would be had I never made the mistake of getting married....
@@shrekt864 I'd rather depend on someone who loves me than a cold soulless machine, but I'm not a woman so I'll never understand the inversion of this logic.
Imagine living in the real world and thinking women don't have any power or authority. Were these people not raised by moms? Have they seen simps faun over young women? Have they never seen a wife manipulate her husband?
Im in a firm belief that the majority of believers have high anxiety. They ultimately over blow others wielding authority or power and are too anxious to wield it themselves leading to "women have no power". Like literally everyone has some power even if its relatively ineffective lol
Feminism LOVES to keep the discussion on "Power" They will force the debate to be centered on Power Structures, Power Systems, its always Power, Power, Power. But who holds all the INFLUENCE over these power structures? Who do social media platforms write their rules for? Who are our politicians terrified to upset?
I am a forty-five year old man who have never oppressed a woman, but one woman took two of my children and my house and my cars and all of my money. Sounds like another anti fash situation
I am sorry to hear Terrance, unfortunately I am living the other option, I get to keep my house and car, but can never cohabitate nor produce a family.
The deeper you go into feminism the more it stops being an extension on liberalism or a political ideology at all. It becomes a religion complete with a founding myth, rites, sins, and virtues.
I really recommend anyone who subscribe to this cult. (Its not really a religion, it has no supernatural "God" only some weird reverence to the female as a something to worship maybe??) really need to im consideration of beig taken away of their "rights".(unearned privilege)
Almost all ideologies become religions when taken to their extremes (or the ideology is already to start with). Corporatism, communism, fascism, national socialism, feminism, wokeism, etc. History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.
The part about women dealing with rejection is so true. I've been punched for rejecting a woman, I've had a woman seem to suffer some sort of nervous breakdown over rejection, and there's a friend of mine that will still bring up the fact I rejected her in a bitter way while bringing up the fact I'm currently in a relationship. Back when I was on Facebook I took full pleasure in utilising my looks in my profile picture and responding to women that made fun of the appearances of men that disagreed with them by doing the same in return, and the rage they showed over the idea of a man being more physically attractive than them actually rejecting them was surreal in the most delicious of ways. xD
Few things are as gratifying as going from fat to Chad and then rejecting women the way they rejected you. Sometimes after having fun first, but sometimes the rejection is even more pleasurable.
@@gumbercules3925 I think I'll grow out of that need for payback... in a year or two, until then, it's just soooooo fucking fun. I mean it's a double-whammy: 1) payback 2) trolling people who absolutely can't handle it and go mental
@AngMori it is really fun for a bit, lol. What i found really surprising and sickening tbh, was the number of women married or with a bf who were just offering or begging for sex. The number of women who wouldn't hesitate to cheat was disgusting.
Carl’s mouse analogy on fearing what is powerless gave me a chuckle. Stereotypically, women and girls are afraid of mice, as well other small things like spiders. Men don’t fear mice because they recognise how harmless they are and will make the traps when it becomes necessary. Case and point, how many female exterminators are out there and where are feminists arguing for that equity quota?
@@whatisaman689 I once dated a girl (from online) who had in her dating profile that she wanted a man to protect her from spiders. I brought this up in jest during a conversation that all I need is a cup and paper, but she still was insistent, lightheadedly, that I still kill the hypothetical spider. I get that women want assurance of a man’s protection, but killing spiders is overkill, like bringing a nuke to a fistfight.
I mean, I have a healthy fear of new animals with unknown parasites and infections, but that fear leads me to caution as I check the traps. There was meant to be a metaphor in there somewhere, but I lost it.
Bars. Women's "sufferage" was women at the house baking pies while young boys went off to die in trenches or get their arms lobbed off in steel mills or buried alive in coal mines. Women have never experienced anything approaching suffering with the exception of the obvious childbirth and those days have long since passed, if a woman suffers in childbirth now it's a totally arbitrary and frankly stupid decision to do so.
Everyone suffers in some way. Feminism elevates the suffering of women and downplays that of men, leading to reactionary views that are unfair to everyone. However, childbirth still carries a risk of mortality, and pain killing drugs given in childbirth can lead to bad outcomes for the mother and/or child. Bodies are messy, and modern life isn't that far from barbarian roots.
@pacca wacca I think you are wrong, but it can only be an opinion, not objective. Arguments can be made on each side, but its not like studies have been done, and suffering is broad and difficult to measure.
This was the sort of "All men are wapists" sheet we had to endure in the 80's. All the women would just trot this bs out like it was axiomatic and were astounded that anyone could disagree or find it offensive.
Most feminists romanticise the lives of women before they got the vote, but the can't see their own hypocrisy, which is a good job, because if they did, they'd be blinded.
Women have the most purchasing power in society, making up to 70-80% of buying choices. That's why you see so many advertisements for men being about specific hobbies or about "getting you the girl", while advertising in general tends to be neutral or family based.
I am sick to death of the unskippable adds for feminine products. UA-cam clearly knows I would never consume such products, yet they torture me anyway.
So true. Mens clubs are sexist. Women's spaces brave. And it can be extended to segregated society in general too. Mobo awards are acceptable. Black only theatre awards, and black only ballet. Yet all other awards now have to have a minimum amount of diversity. We can see how lopsided this is. It's even more telling when trans people are inserted into all this guff too!
every empowered woman I have ever met sudden finds her feminine side when the bill arrives. the expectation of being taken care of and valued is only bad when it suits their agenda.
Who ever wrote this just says that she either has never dated a man or has ever had an stable relationship because she was always reyected, was never asked, was dumped pretty early on or always dated assholes.
I'm guessing she had what we used to call slut behavior. That doesn't usually attract a high value man. So this all means she has terrible judgement. As exemplified by how her "mind" works in this rubbish article.
Whomever wrote this has actually has zero applied logic. If it wasn't for patriarchy looking after and caring and nursing her as a baby she would have existed for about a few days. After all she would have just been left at the side of the road because without patriarchy looking after her when she had zero ability to look after herself. She really has no Idea what she is spouting.
I almost choked on my coffee when Carl said "but have you asked women whether they like it or not?" and the following pause 😂 well done as always, lads!
We fight the wars and die in horrific ways. That's why we had the right to vote. You can see this in Ukraine with the influx of Ukrainian women on tinder while their fathers, boyfriends and sons die. When electric machines hadn't cleared women of their duties, we were the ones who only paid taxes too. There's a reason the UN is pushing the education of women in developing countries because it is the single biggest factor to lowering birthrates by making them enter the workforce. You wrap this up in empowerment and give them a woe is me political bent and you have successfully conquered a nation. Every civilisation that's given women equal rights has failed for a reason. Hence the biblical stories about women, it is wisdom.
Having just had a baby two weeks ago (my third son) I can say it is horribly tiring, painful, *and that's just the beginning*. Then you've got 18 + years of more work, difficulty and worry than you can imagine that you've just given yourself. All that and yet it's the most worthwhile, important, meaningful, beautiful thing I've ever experienced and why I, and mothers everywhere keep doing it.
Being oppressed is having the ability to do whatever you want, working if you prefer to do so, ultimately having all your needs met with no hardline expectations on you other than that you would be pleasant to be around and perhaps raise a child. Not being oppressed is being mandated by societal standards to labor away for some corporation that could not care less whether you live or die.
Women More likely to initiate violence in the home More likely to end a relationship More likely to engage in reputation damage Men Less likely to initiate violence, but more likely to be the one arrested Less likely to end the relationship, but more likely to keep paying at its end Less likely to engage in reputation damage, and more likely to hold the feeling of loss longer As well for Men More likely to die on the job More likely to die in war More likely to be the victim of violence More likely to commit suicide
"Women: More likely to engage in reputation damage." My ex-wife (10 yrs divorced now), did that to me by attacking my character and telling everyone who would have her believed, that I was a horrible person, monster, etc... I truly saw the fear and confusion in her when I did nothing to ruin her character. Sometimes not acting can show one's character far more clearly and transparent, then acting out of hurt and/or aggression. Women project themselves/their feelings onto others; particularly men. I'm in questioning towards your statement to ponder if she was truly afraid, not by my actions/inactions, but by her very nature in regards to: Example - "I will ruin him, so therefore by universal law, he would ruin me!" (Or - "Do unto others, before they do unto you" mentality.) 🤔 Truly self-destructive entities!
@@chipjohnson9283 she still wanted your attention, even negative attention, and she wanted validation for her ending the relationship. Since you didn't give it to her, she was hurt at not receiving the attention, and likely upset (in part at herself) as she didn't receive the validation she wanted. Just my speculation as a woman, and the daughter of divorced parents. Of whom my mother initiated it, but after some years did very clearly regret that decision which I was able to glean through her actions.
You guys should also mention the graveyard of societies and empires throughout history that _were_ run by women, and were promptly ran straight into the ground through mismanagement.
@@SteveShivik in Cleopatra's defense, the Ptolemaic dynasty was a hot mess of inbred idiocy for over a century before she was a twinkle in her father/uncle's eye, Egypt was going to subsumed by Rome regardless of what she did.
I think usually one will find that those periods were associated with a lack of men of any value whatsoever, e.g. all the stooges that Julia Maesa tried putting in charge.
@@benjaminsmith3843 Yeah, Egypt at the time was essentially a remnant, an empty shell of it's former glory, that refused to die during the bronze age collapse just kept going.
My wife is not my slave. She serves me as I serve my son. Her shortcomings are my fault as much as they may be hers. I serve her as she serves my legacy, our son.
Simone de Beauvoir was an existentialist and a narcissist. She cared not a fig about other people whether they be man or woman. It was all about her own gratification in life.
Look at the proverbs 31 woman: A wife of noble character who can find? She is worth far more than rubies. 11 Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value. 12 She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life. 13 She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands. 14 She is like the merchant ships, bringing her food from afar. 15 She gets up while it is still dark; she provides food for her family and portions for her servant girls. 16 She considers a field and buys it; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard. 17 She sets about her work vigorously; her arms are strong for her tasks. 18 She sees that her trading is profitable, and her lamp does not go out at night. 19 In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers. 20 She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy. 21 When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet. 22 She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple. 23 Her husband is respected at the city gate, where he takes his seat among the elders of the land. 24 She makes linen garments and sells them, and supplies the merchants with sashes. 25 She is clothed with strength and dignity; she can laugh at the days to come. 26 She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue. 27 She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness. 28 Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her: 29 "Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all." 30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting; but a woman who fears the LORD is to be praised. 31 Give her the reward she has earned, and let her works bring her praise at the city gate. This means that a Godly woman was literally trading goods, buying and managing property, and raising a Godly family while her husband dealt with matters of State and other physical tasks.
Connor mentioned something in this segment that made me remember a very strange moment in my life. I'm not normally a very romantic, sentimental kind of person. I've never really been the type of woman to long for a husband and children, I haven't had loads of weird crushes on guys that never materialised. I've been quite direct with guys and they have with me. However, one day just over 15 years ago, I turned up to a BBQ party at the parents of my friend's fiance. I knew about half of the people there, so as I walked up the path I wasn't concerned with who I might or might not see. Then, as I was about to go up the steps onto the patio, I saw the naked back of a man I didn't think I knew. And the weirdest thing ever, happened to me. I suddenly had this really bizarre moment where a sort of video played in my mind's eye, showing me a whole collection of moments in the future when I would be out with this man: the two of us celebrating Christmas, the pair of us eating at my favourite restaurant, a family wedding where we were both invited, me and him sat on an embankment watching motorcycle racing... It. Was. Weird. Like...I hadn't met this guy at this point. I hadn't even seen his face. I knew from the back of his head that he wasn't someone I knew and then BAM my brain went into female bizarro mode, where it just sort of showed me that this was the guy I was supposed to be with, I was going to end up with, and these little videos from the future that were playing in my mind, were all going to come true. It was so disturbing at the time, that as I continued up those stairs onto the patio, I walked right past him without so much as glancing at him (I was too afraid to see what he looked like) and went about greeting a bunch of other people, with a smile plastered on my face to hide my discomfort. It took me a good hour or so of downing half-pint glasses of wine and spirits in ridiculous amounts. I had to be drunk before I could go anywhere near him...and I've never been shy or coy around guys, so this was really throwing me for a loop. All that potential future with this guy that had played in my mind like a film reel...that notion that this was something I needed to make happen...it made me decide to just walk right up to him, get his attention and make sure it was me he was going to give his number to that night. It's like Connor's little theory of a woman having to feel as though she has some kind of of prior investment in a guy before she'll consider going out with him...only more intense. And this guy was seriously cute. Walking around in shorts the whole time, leaping in and out of the pool, the kind of hard, toned, muscled body you can only get from working outside in real jobs...tanned from being outside for those aforementioned jobs...tall, dark haired, strong jawed...yeah, there were other women trying to hone in on this guy who basically spent the whole day and evening with a naked glistening torso from never fully drying off. But he came home with me that night. Not in that way. The last bus to where he lived was well gone and he was just planning on throwing his coat down in a field and sleeping under the stars. But I couldn't have that. I offered him my sofa (I wasn't worried because a/ I knew he wasn't going to be a bad dude and b/ I shared a flat with a very burly male friend) so he came back to my place and we sat up all night chatting about absolutely everything, being very personal about previous relationships and our current red-lines...it was as if we both knew this was going to go somewhere and had to make sure we were both on the same page. We became friends immediately, started dating a fortnight later and after a month he moved in. He's been here ever since. And you know what? All the scenarios I'd played out in my head about where we'd both be together in future? They've all happened. Exactly as I imagined they would. So despite not having at all planned it, my brain did that little thing of imagining a future scenario (or 4) which made me see my other half as the one who was destined to be my future lobster. Maybe we simply can't help doing it when it's supposed to be, but some of us misinterpret that as something we should be looking for, before every potenial date or interaction? I don't know. It just made me smile when Connor described that behavioural habit in women, because before I met my other half, I was never like that. It was only that one time when it did sort of happen, that I ended up finding my other half, the love of my life. Weird huh?
There used to be a name for that: "woman's intuition." Before the sexual revolution, women would be patient, and play their cards close to their chest, so to speak. They followed the advice of song of solomon, not pursuing love until it reached a boiling point. Letting themselves listen to their mature intuition and emotions. That's a beautiful, feminine story. Cherish it. Don't let anyone make you feel weird for your feminine feelings and intuition; they're beautiful. And I am sure yer man agrees, haha. Good luck you two
@@skinnysnorlax1876 It's like the poster above said: it feels like some "Final Destination" weirdness (sans mounting death tolls, lol) but what you've just said there about 'feminine intuition' makes sense. Even if it was just my subconscious operating on a very logical level, somehow noting that from behind I could see from his back that he was tall (I'm 5 ft small) so that would be a biologically sound target if seeking a mate (taller guy genes make the most of my short chick genes, plus taller guy is bigger and stronger and able to protect midget woman + offspring) maybe it was my brain concocting ways of making me feel I needed to be drawn to him to pair up most optimally, thus the "déjà voodoo, future view woo," mentally concocted reasoning designed to make me think I was definitely pursuing Mr Right. I don't know. But there has to be some kind of rational, logical reason behind it...even if it just sounds like a cute story when if I leave it alone and accept it as some kind of "fait accompli" shenanigans. Either way, I ain't complaining because I got my Mr tall, dark & handsome protector....and he got his pintsized #SandwichBroad who does his washing and is currently drawing 3-3 in our games of Trivial Pursuit, lol.
@@bad-girlbex3791 that's cute as hell lol. But if it puts your mind at ease, your brain is taking in billions of points of data every second and processing it at a subconscious level. Who knows how many rational conclusions it makes every second?
This reminds me of Fiddler on the Roof. They were a very conservative traditional Jewish community and man was definitely head of the household on paper. In reality it was shown many many times just how much power the wife had in running the show. So much so you wondered if the man was really the head.
"The man is the head, but the wife is the neck, and she can turn him wherever she wants" -my big fat greek wedding. Great line, honestly. It shows the kind of supporting position women have, and how they can leverage that. If the two adults are cognizant of that dynamic, it's fine. One of my old mentors put it this way: "the women control the direction in a relationship, but men control the pace." Basically, the more sensitive party (and I don't mean that in a necessarily negative way) will always have a say on the direction the family is headed, whereas the main working unit is going to control how quickly they get there.
I had a terrifying revelation the other day. The thing that explains why decadent societies (like late Rome) always fail. I was explaining "trophic cascades" (the wolves in Yellowstone thing) to my mom. There's this thing called an *ecology of fear* that fundamentally alters behavior. Without the fear of wolves, elk and deer went nuts wrecking the environment... and importantly *culling the population didn't help*. It was the change in behavior from lack of fear. And of course that reverted when we put wolves back in the forest. Anyway about humans. We have no outside forces to fear. We killed them all. Therefore, there is no impetus for women to seek men for protection. This fundamentally alters behavior. This is the root cause of mass family breakdown which always predicts societal breakdown. It's not just people getting soft from a gentle life - it's a profound shift in psychology. Why is this terrifying? Because for the first time EVER this is GLOBAL. I genuinely don't think civilization will survive this. Also the solution is concerning - introducing opportunistic predators to force people to be inside or travel in groups... initiating an impetus to form social bonds (particularly between the sexes). The HELL would that look like? Humans aren't evolved enough for civilization. Someone replied to this recently about provision being a valid replacement of protection. To which I replied how women out-earn men now and the anti-male agenda is continuing to accelerate. We're fucked.
Yeah. I think we are far more vulnerable than we are aware of. How many modern people would survive if the grid went down for 2 months? Do they know how to find clean sources of water? How to get their own food? One large solar flare could make the world as we know it disappear in an instant and people act as if nothing bad will ever happen again.
Well, let's just make everywhere Africa or the ME, if you know what I mean. Surely, when low IQ, violent, sociopathic men roam the streets in packs, women will again seek the protection and comfort of a civilized man. Indeed, I believe places like France and Sweden will see that come to fruition in the next decade. Personally, I chose such a life without needing the influence of fear, but rather because I saw that it would be better not only for my family, but for society as a whole; and I quite love my country, so I would prefer it to succeed. Guess I'm just more (or feminists would say less) evolved than modern strong independent women who don't need no man lmao
There was definitely never a "patriarchy" in the culture I grew up in. In fact, it was other WOMEN that enforced women to maintain their roles. For example, if a woman wasn't taking care of her kids properly, the other women of the area would get a bunch of switches and set them by the offending woman's door. This was a warning that if she didn't straighten up, the other women were going to beat her. Husbands typically had little say in household affairs, so if his wife was lazy and didn't take care of him, the other women would take care of her. Not him. On the other side, if a man wasn't taking care of his home and family or was abusive, the area women might arrange for him to "disappear". My great grandmother once said "If a man hit me once, I might forgive him. If he ever hit me again...well...he has to go to sleep sometime, don't he?"
Reminds me of reading academic papers in the times I had to go to university. When you go out into the real world such nonsense is realised as nonsense. But when you are absorbed in the university industrtial complex you don't realise it is nonsense. Or people are propagandised to believe the nonsense wholeheartedly. Universities have a lot to answer for.
I always give folks I mentor, especially creative types, two questions to ask themselves when presented with new ideas and info. 1) is this bullshit? 2) could someone be profiting off of saying this? 1) seems obvious but many people are very trusting, and find it unpleasant to think critically because....well because it's critical. 2) is not necessarily going to teach you anything about the content of what someone is saying, but it can help with the context. If someone is profiting off of reasonable and accurate info I don't mind supporting it. It's why I am here
My parents are Korean. The traditional Korean culture is one of the most patriarchal cultures in the world. Women get no say. They end up being servants to their husband’s families. Thankfully, it’s not like this anymore because some mother-in-laws protect their daughter-in-laws from the fate they suffered. I laugh hysterically when Western women complain about the patriarchy. I’ve never seen so much doting on women and girls in my life. You could argue that there’s a level of infantilization that happens which is demeaning to women but many Western women often use it to their advantage so 🤷♀️. I’m not really sure what everyone is complaining about in the West. There’s other cultures where women are treated much worse. It’s like they’re so privileged, they complain.
That is exactly what happened. Something to note is that most of the original movements weren't started or populated by people who actually had to work for a living, but rather by the wives and daughters of the wealthy who's families had servants to do all the normal work so that they could lounge about doing nothing in particular which, as we all know, is the cruellest form of oppression.
It is beyond infuriating to me how feminists keep pretending that Western [birthing persons] have it as bad as [birthing persons] under Sharia/Islamic enclaves, yet do *absolutely nothing* to alleviate that barbaric state of affairs in the Islamic world. The only real would-be reformers come from within those Islamic societies themselves, and they almost invariably end up martyred for trying. *_And every time that happens, Western feminists stay silent._* Worse, when that culture of wanton abuse and rapine ends up imported, they not only ignore the actual victims of what they [falsely] claim was already happening on a daily basis in the West, _they move Heaven and Earth to defend the criminals for the dumbest reasons imaginable._ This has only ever been a game of self-serving oneupsmanship for these spoiled brats. And such hubris causes the universe itself to cry out for a cosmic reckoning...
@@handles_are_a_bit_rubbish The hubris and incandescent malice of the Suffragettes knew no bounds. We as a society need to start curbing this crap more.
I doubt the validity of the claim that Korea was virulently patriarchal. Seems to me what people refer to as patriarchy is usually closer to equality from a non-gynocentric perspective.
13:53 - it’s not wrong. What’s wrong is that she’s framing it as a negative. The hormones really do a number on me and often the baby demands food even if I don’t want to eat lol. But I don’t think of my baby as a parasite. It’s such a weird feeling to be two people in one body. I willingly give over my body to my child. It’s not fun I’ll tell you that. But it’s what makes me feel uniquely female. And I do feel like I’m connected to humanity - the past and the future - by carrying a child. I continue the line of my ancestors into the future. It’s my duty to not forsake their sacrifices.
I find it fun! Some parts suck. The brain fog is 100% negative (though I do try to make a joke of it). The exhaustion. The smell sensitivity (I already gave a weak stomach without being pregnant, bummer). The random aches and pains. When your joints get loose and it feels like your body is about to fall apart like a skeleton in a game collapsing into a pile of bones. The insomnia. And on and on. But some parts are super duper duper fun, like feeling the baby move. Like when the baby kicks me so hard in the middle of the night that I jump awake. The crazy vivid dreams. Laughing at, while simultaneously feeling bad for, my husband because every time he tries to feel the baby move it kicks a different spot or stops moving all together. Being extra spoiled by my husband as the baby grows. And the best part, hearing the baby's first cry, that is truly the most fun and absolutely an unforgettable moment.
She was most likely sexually abused by her father, it's commonplace for someone to hate the opposite gender when the one that is supposed to protect you, abuses you.
Except shame gullible young men into enlisting in World War 1, and continue to hector them even when they manage to come home maimed or crippled by the most pointless conflict in human history. (Seriously, look up the White Feather movement some time.)
Women and men have always held authority in difference spheres. The problem is women voluntarily relinquished theirs as part of the feminism movement, and men have kept theirs.
My gran born in 1902, worked as a young child married at 17, had 11 children and worked right up till she got a pension at 60. She did some house cleaning for another 6 years when she was moved out after a slum clearance project. She knew real poverty but never complained about woman’s rights etc. all she was worried about was, paying the rent, food on the table and keeping away from doctors and hospitals.
I would love to see a study and discussion about the role women play in warfare. If you read the accounts of people before and during wartime and accounts from tribal societies, a pattern begins to form. Women essentially force men to go to war by emotional and sexual blackmail, in almost every case.
It is kind of like the she says that men have "biological privilege" when it is clear from an evolutionary view men have earned it by being on the front lines of putting ourselves at risk.
I don't have anything personal against Beauvoir, but I think she is ignoring the tradeoff that men get to be used as infantry fodder, and considering that she published this shortly after WW2, that's not an excusable oversight. Sometimes it's better to have your power behind the scenes and off the record.
@@elliottgaal9774 Probably not. But the French experience of the war was different. Beauvoir's main problem is that she is a minefield of having her cake and eating it too.
She is a banshee that is very good of mental gymnastics. She might be one of the few cases where "witch-burning" is such a justifiable form of punishment for being as she is such a shameless liar believing her BS.
She's writing as though she's talking about all women, but I think she's actually just talking about herself without realising it. When she says that females endure coitus and gain nothing from motherhood, it should read _'I_ endure coitus and _I_ don't see anything to gain in becoming a mother'. She also says something about some women having excessive androgens causing more masculine features. Again I think she's probably speaking about herself and it would help explain the above; she might just have messed up hormones and a resulting poor relationship with herself as a woman that combined is making her mentally and physically less inclined towards sex and motherhood, and perhaps resentful of the fact that she's a masculine woman rather than a man. If that's the case then this (her worldview and writings) might be a cope in which she tells herself that all women's lives suck and not just hers.
Let's finally admit this. Giving right to a group who perceives they are oppressed because they are of a different sex IS A GRAVE MISTAKE. TIME TO TAKE IT AWAY.
Just to be clear I utimately talk of unearned privileges. And a good chunk of their "rights" are really unearned if you consider the history and context. Still, for all their "progress", these UNGRATEFUL WITCHES wanted more. They are for supremacy, it was never about equality.
Admittedly, Islam doesn't prohibit as many behaviors towards women as I'd like, but you're not wrong. Hard to be a target when surrounded by men who'll fight for you.
I believe the academic term for this viewpoint is to ‘cope and seethe.’ Imagine seeing biology and sex as nothing more than a power game. How hollow, how pathetic, how absolutely reductionist.
to destroy families, you need to change women first. What happened is that women's idea of everything got inverted, and we see the result of that. plain and simple.
The way that femenism weirdly elevates the concept and collective of "Men" to almost godhood(a tyrannical god ofc, but still by their own description something almost omnipotent and able to dictate the direction of society and history at our whims), while at the same time showing such contempt and looking down on the individual man is kinda baffling!? It has got to be weird to have this kind of worldview and at the same time be so insistent that "Men" are the ones that have "Othered" women, troughout the whole of time none the less :p Cognitive dissonance turned up to 11 I guess, but still strange and nonsensical...
That woman clearly never reed much into history, like the monoglian empire, or when Rome gave women the right to vote and they held quite a bit of power for some time. The idea that men were worried about the economic power of women as Agriculture was becoming a thing is...insane. They also forget things like witch hunts mostly killed men.
Why are women now oppressing and holding down other women in this "liberated" era? That's the question I want answered. Any woman who thinks the power differential is in the man's direction has never actually had any power over a man.
The subject of this segment is one of many (especially in recent times) that reminds me of the German fairy tale of The Fisherman and His Wife. When it comes to those who complain about The Patriarchy®, whatever you give them will never be enough and your effort will be wasted in trying to appease them.
Because the revolution must be continual. As James Lindsey said at oxford "woke culture has not gone too far because it cannot go too far." These folks want the status quo to be perpetual revolution
Every time I hear about "da patriarchy", all I can think of is Galatea (The Authentic Observer) talking about how the coal mining towns that her family came from functioned. The men were the breadwinners, sure, but 1) they faced absolute horrors in the mines, from explosions to poisonings, and 2) women controlled the money that the men earned. Women made the money that the men earned stretch enough to feed, clothe, and house the family, all while taking care of the children and the home. That's not an easy task, and pretending that the women who did that were just subservient idiots who were unable to affect anything is fucking ridiculous. Even the BIBLE has passages that explain how women always did have power and influence in society. Imagine thinking that we live in a society that is more repressive than societies 2000+ years ago. Life was always very, very hard, and both men and women took up roles that made the things that needed to happen a bit more manageable. Just because women tended to stay at home doesn't mean that they never had any power or influence in society. Women spearheaded many parts of the abolitionist movement in Britain, for example. They refused to buy sugar produced on plantations where slaves were used, which heavily impacted the ability of those plantations to operate. The control of money makes women much more powerful and influential than feminists would like you to believe. None of what I said even applies to the situation we're in today, where I think it's very clear that women are at a distinct advantage. The courts, societal pressures, all sorts of things are plainly favoring women over men, to the point where men are villainized and made out to be complete monsters. It's all based on a lie, and that French bitch was a big part of why it started.
Even though I'm an Atheist, at times like this I'm reminded of the wisdom of the Ancient Peoples who believed that all of "Gods" main powers came from the Spoken Word. Like Genesis, where everything "God" does in the creation (except perhaps the very first act of creating the world entirely) is done by Speaking. "And God Said." "And God Said." "And God Said." etc. And the power "God" gave to Adam was to Name all the creatures. And here we have an example of someone utterly twisting and perverting language to the point where it is more destructive to our society than any physical weapon that humans could ever devise.
The Patriarchy: a feminist ghost story. Whenever a man succeeds, it is patriarchy. Whenever a man fails, it is because of patriarchy. Whenever a woman fails, it is because of patriarchy. Whenever a woman discovers feminist inaccuracies, it is internalised misogyny. *But* when women are elevated structurally, societally *everywhere* in employment, education, social life, courts, largely from male tax money.... *THAT'S* not Patriarchy. That's a woman's natural strength. 💪
"Leeching off the work of men is a women's natural strength"... kek
artificially elevated.
if they could take all of this on their own, they would have been the rulers long ago. they always need someone to hand it to them
Wanna know something interesting?
They don't care that its makes no sense, they will lie in your face.
It is about power, we should stop using their language, because it is not true, and only works to push their ideology.
@@thefool8224 Women empowerment, free and independent is basically just reparations for imagined crimes against them. It boils down to women empowerment being "gibs"
They are so strong, independent, and capable that they can be kept down so easily. The oppression of the pickle jar and spider on the wall.
In the last 200 years *women have ruled on the British throne for 134 years,* _patriarchy._
Haha, they'll just claim that these women have internalized patriarchy. You know, from the same great minds who brought us "systemic racism".
if feminism's 'the patriarchy' exists, feminism wouldn't.
@@michelguevara151
Exactly.
In Iran and Saudi Arabia they really do have a patriarchy.
kind of like a racist nation that elects a black president...twice...consecutively.
@@englishpayerofgermantaxes8186 It's not too late to learn this power.
Protection of women = "putting women in a subordinate position"
You don't protect someone or something you consider less valuable. The level of resentment needed to see it this way is telling.
You're right. It has big, "Women suffer most in war because men fight and DEI," energy
This is women in a nutshell. Ungrateful.
Protection of women≠ “putting women in a subordinate position”
@@leonardticsay8046 ...
That was the point.
Resentment, jealousy, 🌭envy.
If only we had treated Simone de Bouvoir the way she wrote us men out to be. Society would have been infinitely better off today.
Good point, it must be a prescription not a description 😂
Well, the Ts will do to wmn exactly what the Feminists did/do to men.
Rotation of the proletariat - each time they install a new class in the hierarchy above the existing ones
I take some solace in the knowledge she is in Hell right now.
Do you recall who Simone worked for?
The past version of Epsteins female pal.
His story repeats.
And even if the average man is a monster, then the average woman has access to an army of monsters.
It makes me so mad that these feminists completely disregard the significance of motherhood. Mothers are the MOST fundamental part of any civilization. Mothers and their children are the REASON men create civilizations and technology and art in the first place!! To say motherhood is historically insignificant is to be completely divorced from reality
I feel like if women didn’t bear children and continue the human race, men would have gotten rid of us long ago lol.
Though many of them seem to really much prefer the touch of a woman. It’s why I believe sexual preference isn’t a choice.
@@umiluv nah the sensibility of a Woman and the love are reason enough to keep woman.
Well there is a reason why there’s this stereotype of feminists, especially radical ones, going around where they have daddy issues.
Lol rubbish ...my mother didn't love me and just had sex to please my dad ....
Not all mothers are incredible !
@@simbabwe2907 lmao
It used to be families that ruled - that included the women within those families.
Schrodinger's Feminism - where women are empowered and oppressed at exactly the same time!
Whatever benefits them more
Superposition is a model of quantum phenomena that describes what we cannot fully understand. The only observed superposition of mutually exclusive states is found in the mind of women.
And this is exactly why so many men do not and cannot take women seriously.
My dad died 4 years ago. According to the left I shouldn't feel a continuous missing and grieving for him.
I really hate these freakshow circus people.
@bongland greg Man, my heart goes out to you. I can hardly imagine, and I really fear to.
Unironically, one of the most comforting things about Christianity is the assurance that we will meet again soon. It's gotten me through burying more loved ones than I care to count.
More capable fathers have lost out custody battles on numerous occasions purely because they are men in fact men are still by and large regarded as 2nd class citizens when it comes to raising their own children
The workplaces as well if a female coworker does not like you, she just has to make a claim that you said something sexual to them, and you will be fired without any proper investigation.
Hey. A father straight up gave he finger to his country's government. By changing his gender from male to female. All so he could protect his children and give them a better chance at life. Yet, the legal system always was bias towards women. In turn, he figured a legal loophole and gained custody of his children. FYI: This pissed off the weirdos on the Left. All because this guy used the system against itself. And won.
And I should correct myself. Said "Father" is now Mother. So SHE is with HER children now away from that woman SHE was partners to. (I am being sarcastic here...)
@redonkulaspopp
has entered the chat....
That's so true, The woman if she leaves the man voluntarily without any kinds of threats of violence etc more than likely you would be worse for her to raise the The inability to compromise on conditions is more likely to screw up the kids than anything else.
@@celestial962420 I was in a cafeteria with colleagues, in earshot of the men. I made the mistake of calling a group of hen-pecking women out on their open sexism. The accusations began immediately and before I knew it, I was blackballed from my job because a bunch of women had stood up in solidarity to a misogynist who was creating an "unsafe" work environment where they felt threatened by my attitude. Seriously, you have to be really careful, because the way women will portray and curate a situation to favourably position themselves at your expense, is masterful. There's a lost book out there, Tsun Tzus Wife's art of war against men.
In Japan, it is entirely normal for the man to work 50-60+ hour weeks, come home and turn over every yen he makes to the wife. He is then allocated an allowance usually between 50-100 pounds for the month. But seriously, guys, Japan is absolutely at the bottom of the gender equity rankings - the WEF told me so.
Reminds me of a video I saw in which a Japanese politician visits the US during the late 19th century and thinks it weird how subservient men are to women. Holding the door for them, buying them expensive stuff, fighting for them etc.
The west has been better to women for a long time due to the west being a guilt based, nuclear family oriented society compared to the east which is shame and clan based.
Yet now..
Embarassing !
It's true. Men are push overs not because women are strong
"In-a Japan, you-a simpree stlike woman-a weeth butt-a samari swordru."
The only conclusion I can ever come to is: if you want equal rights you deserve equal fights. If you refuse equal fights, but still demand equal rights, you should be laughed at and ridiculed.
What does this mean? You want to beat the shit out of women because they want equal rights? Wtf
Women and men just operate on such a different level. I’ve noticed men are much more hands on and like to get physical to gauge the situation. Women aren’t like that. And pregnant women really can’t be like that so…
Not sure how we can make things “equal” since men and women are so different.
@@umiluv You've hit upon the perennial difficulty, In a healthy society I don't think we would want to be the same, we would respect the difference and value each other.
I want women to be as disposable as a man. If that angers women, then clearly that is their toxic femininity speaking.
'How dare you don't have sex with me!!' -wahmen
These are the same people that call others incels.
F#ck those Beastly looks broads...they on here scrolling too cuz they know the shoe fit MF lol
A hypocrisy which demands a cosmic spanking that reduces the offender's coccyx to powder.
An old saying:
"Anyone who thinks women don't have power has never been in a relationship with one."
Remember kids, simping is a choice, not an obligation.
THOU SHALT NOT SIMP
Thenth circle of Hell: SIMPING
“Men keep women in a state of dependence”
Is another way of saying men have done everything, do everything and will continue to do everything to look after women.
Sounds a bit ungrateful to me.
On the planet I come from, men and women do indeed depend on each other. That's why they serve different roles and form relationships.
@@TheGreenKnight500 the only thing men are dependent on women for is reproduction. They can do everything else easily, by themselves. Millions of men exist their entire lives alone, the only woman ever caring for them was their own mother. Millions of men are dragged down and prevented from reaching their potential because of the female they are stuck with, like an albatross around their neck. I am the latter, and until I was 46 I was indentured to one to the point I am only now at 53 starting to be able to save money and get ahead. Where I would be had I never made the mistake of getting married....
You being dependant on the state = bad
Woman being dependant on you = good
Lol. Lmao
@@shrekt864 I'd rather depend on someone who loves me than a cold soulless machine, but I'm not a woman so I'll never understand the inversion of this logic.
@@SweatyFatGuy The high rates of male loneliness and suicide say otherwise.
Imagine living in the real world and thinking women don't have any power or authority. Were these people not raised by moms? Have they seen simps faun over young women? Have they never seen a wife manipulate her husband?
Who controls education in modern society and has been the primary educators for the past 200 years? It isn't a male dominated field.
The majority of voters are women.
If we lived in a world where women had no power we might have made great advancements towards being a spacefaring civilization
Im in a firm belief that the majority of believers have high anxiety. They ultimately over blow others wielding authority or power and are too anxious to wield it themselves leading to "women have no power". Like literally everyone has some power even if its relatively ineffective lol
Feminism LOVES to keep the discussion on "Power" They will force the debate to be centered on Power Structures, Power Systems, its always Power, Power, Power.
But who holds all the INFLUENCE over these power structures? Who do social media platforms write their rules for? Who are our politicians terrified to upset?
I am a forty-five year old man who have never oppressed a woman, but one woman took two of my children and my house and my cars and all of my money. Sounds like another anti fash situation
Legally, this is unheard of. You are lying.
This is what happens when you get married. Don't.
I am sorry to hear Terrance, unfortunately I am living the other option, I get to keep my house and car, but can never cohabitate nor produce a family.
@@rattelv426 I am sorry Brother. This life has another plan for us. God Bless you.
@@tjj1977tjj all good mate I have a niece & nephew to spoil.
They never actually said why Patriarchy is a bad thing.
because it's a strawman, if feminism's 'the patriarchy' exists, feminism wouldn't.
It isn't.
Patriarchies generally protect women.
Matriarchies hang up men to dry.
The deeper you go into feminism the more it stops being an extension on liberalism or a political ideology at all. It becomes a religion complete with a founding myth, rites, sins, and virtues.
I really recommend anyone who subscribe to this cult. (Its not really a religion, it has no supernatural "God" only some weird reverence to the female as a something to worship maybe??) really need to im consideration of beig taken away of their "rights".(unearned privilege)
if feminism's mythical 'the patriarchy' exists, feminism wouldn't.
@@michelguevara151 Them's the facts.
The radical left tries to sell their ideology as a form of liberalism, when it couldn't be further from that in reality.
Almost all ideologies become religions when taken to their extremes (or the ideology is already to start with). Corporatism, communism, fascism, national socialism, feminism, wokeism, etc. History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.
The part about women dealing with rejection is so true. I've been punched for rejecting a woman, I've had a woman seem to suffer some sort of nervous breakdown over rejection, and there's a friend of mine that will still bring up the fact I rejected her in a bitter way while bringing up the fact I'm currently in a relationship.
Back when I was on Facebook I took full pleasure in utilising my looks in my profile picture and responding to women that made fun of the appearances of men that disagreed with them by doing the same in return, and the rage they showed over the idea of a man being more physically attractive than them actually rejecting them was surreal in the most delicious of ways. xD
100% this. Women completely lose their minds when rejected.
Few things are as gratifying as going from fat to Chad and then rejecting women the way they rejected you.
Sometimes after having fun first, but sometimes the rejection is even more pleasurable.
@AngMori couldnt agree more..its an eye opening experience
@@gumbercules3925 I think I'll grow out of that need for payback... in a year or two, until then, it's just soooooo fucking fun.
I mean it's a double-whammy:
1) payback
2) trolling people who absolutely can't handle it and go mental
@AngMori it is really fun for a bit, lol. What i found really surprising and sickening tbh, was the number of women married or with a bf who were just offering or begging for sex. The number of women who wouldn't hesitate to cheat was disgusting.
Wokeness really has gone full cult at this point
it always was. it now just "seems" to have the numbers to fill a church.
Was from the beginning.
My grandmother once said, "Why do women want to lower themselves to equality."
Carl’s mouse analogy on fearing what is powerless gave me a chuckle. Stereotypically, women and girls are afraid of mice, as well other small things like spiders. Men don’t fear mice because they recognise how harmless they are and will make the traps when it becomes necessary. Case and point, how many female exterminators are out there and where are feminists arguing for that equity quota?
Seeing problems bigger as they are, calling for help against harmless things ..
Yea, woman behavior.
@@whatisaman689 I once dated a girl (from online) who had in her dating profile that she wanted a man to protect her from spiders. I brought this up in jest during a conversation that all I need is a cup and paper, but she still was insistent, lightheadedly, that I still kill the hypothetical spider. I get that women want assurance of a man’s protection, but killing spiders is overkill, like bringing a nuke to a fistfight.
I mean, I have a healthy fear of new animals with unknown parasites and infections, but that fear leads me to caution as I check the traps. There was meant to be a metaphor in there somewhere, but I lost it.
@@robertbeisert3315 proportional cautions for the size of the risk. We got you.
@@heartlessangel2910, my wife flipped out about a mouse on a stick trap in our garage. She wanted to free it. I just placed it in a box and curbed it.
They define all functional marriages as patriarchal but the institution of marriage has always been a cooperative beneficial relationship.
Until now.
@@KiKfilms It's not really marriage if you can leave for any reason. Basically just a legal tax partnership.
Bars. Women's "sufferage" was women at the house baking pies while young boys went off to die in trenches or get their arms lobbed off in steel mills or buried alive in coal mines. Women have never experienced anything approaching suffering with the exception of the obvious childbirth and those days have long since passed, if a woman suffers in childbirth now it's a totally arbitrary and frankly stupid decision to do so.
Perhaps one motive for feminism, for some, was a desire to once again share in the risks of life.
Everyone suffers in some way. Feminism elevates the suffering of women and downplays that of men, leading to reactionary views that are unfair to everyone. However, childbirth still carries a risk of mortality, and pain killing drugs given in childbirth can lead to bad outcomes for the mother and/or child. Bodies are messy, and modern life isn't that far from barbarian roots.
Childbirth is no longer painful. The women understander has arrived
@@TheGalxz Men have always suffered objectively more quite frankly.
@pacca wacca I think you are wrong, but it can only be an opinion, not objective. Arguments can be made on each side, but its not like studies have been done, and suffering is broad and difficult to measure.
Enough about women's rights. It's time to discuss women's wrongs.
👍🏽
And how best to punish them.
No! It's time to discuss men's wrongs
This was the sort of "All men are wapists" sheet we had to endure in the 80's. All the women would just trot this bs out like it was axiomatic and were astounded that anyone could disagree or find it offensive.
Then they would wonder why men avoided them like the plague...
People men will always listen too....
Their mum
Their wife
Their dad
The barman
Dave down the pub....
Dave is right.
@@sirzorg5728 especially after a few pints of stella
also the cousin
the grandfather
the grandmother
the clown
Dave knows it all
I'd just listen to Dave
This is well timed... I just got yelled at that the "patriarchy" has done more damage to men then anything else in existence.
The system that empowers men has harmed them more than anything in the world
??? ??? ???????? ? ? ?????
@@MechaSixVII I didn't say that she made any sense... Just that I was yelled at about it.
Yup, logic can be hard for feminists.
@@MechaSixVII To be fair modern feminism has harmed women more than anything else.
@@rwberger6 yeah. It turns normal women into unmarriable dumpster fires.
made me chuckle.
This reminds me of an older video of Sargon's, about a feminist who romanticized the stone age life of women. It was so detached from reality
Wtf is a diaperfur doing on this channel?
Sounds a bit like "history according to sociology" (zomething like that) on freedomtoons
Most feminists romanticise the lives of women before they got the vote, but the can't see their own hypocrisy, which is a good job, because if they did, they'd be blinded.
Omg that sounds hilarious. What's the title
@@vigbokwe69 I had to go digging for this
ua-cam.com/video/9GYW9-DRcio/v-deo.html
I hope one day the gynocentric model of history will be viewed in the same light as the geocentric model of astronomy.
It's cyclical. Hard Patriarchy -> Soft Patriarchy -> Soft Matriarchy -> Hard Matriarchy -> Demographic/Economical Collapse -> Hard Patriarchy
Women have the most purchasing power in society, making up to 70-80% of buying choices. That's why you see so many advertisements for men being about specific hobbies or about "getting you the girl", while advertising in general tends to be neutral or family based.
I am sick to death of the unskippable adds for feminine products. UA-cam clearly knows I would never consume such products, yet they torture me anyway.
Translation: "I hate myself and I hate being a woman, and you should too."
How inspiring...
"The man rules the business, the money and the household and the woman rules the man" Chinese saying
Every time women are in charge male only spaces dissappear.
We don't want to listen to incessant complaints.
Thats why I get ignored.
So true. Mens clubs are sexist. Women's spaces brave. And it can be extended to segregated society in general too. Mobo awards are acceptable. Black only theatre awards, and black only ballet. Yet all other awards now have to have a minimum amount of diversity.
We can see how lopsided this is. It's even more telling when trans people are inserted into all this guff too!
every empowered woman I have ever met sudden finds her feminine side when the bill arrives. the expectation of being taken care of and valued is only bad when it suits their agenda.
And when some heavy furniture needs shifting.
Who ever wrote this just says that she either has never dated a man or has ever had an stable relationship because she was always reyected, was never asked, was dumped pretty early on or always dated assholes.
I'm guessing she had what we used to call slut behavior. That doesn't usually attract a high value man. So this all means she has terrible judgement. As exemplified by how her "mind" works in this rubbish article.
Feminism really is just the collective observations of embittered old women whose only dating experience comes from teenage boys.
@@bulletbill5977 When they were drunk at a frat party in college.
Whomever wrote this has actually has zero applied logic. If it wasn't for patriarchy looking after and caring and nursing her as a baby she would have existed for about a few days. After all she would have just been left at the side of the road because without patriarchy looking after her when she had zero ability to look after herself.
She really has no Idea what she is spouting.
Even Phyrexians have better stances on dating.
I almost choked on my coffee when Carl said "but have you asked women whether they like it or not?" and the following pause 😂 well done as always, lads!
We fight the wars and die in horrific ways. That's why we had the right to vote. You can see this in Ukraine with the influx of Ukrainian women on tinder while their fathers, boyfriends and sons die. When electric machines hadn't cleared women of their duties, we were the ones who only paid taxes too. There's a reason the UN is pushing the education of women in developing countries because it is the single biggest factor to lowering birthrates by making them enter the workforce. You wrap this up in empowerment and give them a woe is me political bent and you have successfully conquered a nation. Every civilisation that's given women equal rights has failed for a reason. Hence the biblical stories about women, it is wisdom.
Most men in the UK got the right to vote at the same time as women - but women didn't have to go off in wars to die.
So... true Patriarchy has never been tried?
Let's correct that lads
She just hates humanity.
The patriarchy isn't a historical reality, it's a suggestion emanating from the loins of women.
Probably accurate tbh.
Haven't done my patriarching quota today, the women are starting to rise up.
Better Man Up! ♂️
The patriarchy has always been a joke. But then apparently me saying that means I hate myself 😂
It must be an awful burden, living life thinking that you have agency. Poor thing
"Gestation is tiring work that offers women no benefit" _ask mothers, you spinster._
Having just had a baby two weeks ago (my third son) I can say it is horribly tiring, painful, *and that's just the beginning*. Then you've got 18 + years of more work, difficulty and worry than you can imagine that you've just given yourself. All that and yet it's the most worthwhile, important, meaningful, beautiful thing I've ever experienced and why I, and mothers everywhere keep doing it.
They were always held accountable. That's what has changed.
Being oppressed is having the ability to do whatever you want, working if you prefer to do so, ultimately having all your needs met with no hardline expectations on you other than that you would be pleasant to be around and perhaps raise a child. Not being oppressed is being mandated by societal standards to labor away for some corporation that could not care less whether you live or die.
Companies should split their departments into men-only, wmn-only, and men+wmn teams.
Then let nature take it's course.
For her entire life as a feminist, Camille Paglia has said, "If human progress were left up to women, humans would still be living in mud huts".
8:50 "Inasmuch as he exists for himself, the child would not grasp himself as sexually differentiated." Carl's look of perplexity says it all.
Women
More likely to initiate violence in the home
More likely to end a relationship
More likely to engage in reputation damage
Men
Less likely to initiate violence, but more likely to be the one arrested
Less likely to end the relationship, but more likely to keep paying at its end
Less likely to engage in reputation damage, and more likely to hold the feeling of loss longer
As well for Men
More likely to die on the job
More likely to die in war
More likely to be the victim of violence
More likely to commit suicide
"Women: More likely to engage in reputation damage."
My ex-wife (10 yrs divorced now), did that to me by attacking my character and telling everyone who would have her believed, that I was a horrible person, monster, etc...
I truly saw the fear and confusion in her when I did nothing to ruin her character. Sometimes not acting can show one's character far more clearly and transparent, then acting out of hurt and/or aggression.
Women project themselves/their feelings onto others; particularly men. I'm in questioning towards your statement to ponder if she was truly afraid, not by my actions/inactions, but by her very nature in regards to: Example - "I will ruin him, so therefore by universal law, he would ruin me!" (Or - "Do unto others, before they do unto you" mentality.)
🤔 Truly self-destructive entities!
@@chipjohnson9283 she still wanted your attention, even negative attention, and she wanted validation for her ending the relationship.
Since you didn't give it to her, she was hurt at not receiving the attention, and likely upset (in part at herself) as she didn't receive the validation she wanted.
Just my speculation as a woman, and the daughter of divorced parents. Of whom my mother initiated it, but after some years did very clearly regret that decision which I was able to glean through her actions.
You guys should also mention the graveyard of societies and empires throughout history that _were_ run by women, and were promptly ran straight into the ground through mismanagement.
Fancy naming any? I'd like some reading material.
@@blunderingfoolread about cleopatra
@@SteveShivik in Cleopatra's defense, the Ptolemaic dynasty was a hot mess of inbred idiocy for over a century before she was a twinkle in her father/uncle's eye, Egypt was going to subsumed by Rome regardless of what she did.
I think usually one will find that those periods were associated with a lack of men of any value whatsoever, e.g. all the stooges that Julia Maesa tried putting in charge.
@@benjaminsmith3843 Yeah, Egypt at the time was essentially a remnant, an empty shell of it's former glory, that refused to die during the bronze age collapse just kept going.
My wife is not my slave. She serves me as I serve my son. Her shortcomings are my fault as much as they may be hers. I serve her as she serves my legacy, our son.
Simone de Beauvoir was an existentialist and a narcissist. She cared not a fig about other people whether they be man or woman. It was all about her own gratification in life.
"It's revenge against god for the crime of being." - JP
"We are women and we are free!"
"Shut the fuck up!"
Grand Theft Auto V memed it perfectly.
Look at the proverbs 31 woman:
A wife of noble character who can find? She is worth far more than rubies.
11
Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value.
12
She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life.
13
She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands.
14
She is like the merchant ships, bringing her food from afar.
15
She gets up while it is still dark; she provides food for her family and portions for her servant girls.
16
She considers a field and buys it; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.
17
She sets about her work vigorously; her arms are strong for her tasks.
18
She sees that her trading is profitable, and her lamp does not go out at night.
19
In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers.
20
She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy.
21
When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet.
22
She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple.
23
Her husband is respected at the city gate, where he takes his seat among the elders of the land.
24
She makes linen garments and sells them, and supplies the merchants with sashes.
25
She is clothed with strength and dignity; she can laugh at the days to come.
26
She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue.
27
She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness.
28
Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her:
29
"Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all."
30
Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting; but a woman who fears the LORD is to be praised.
31
Give her the reward she has earned, and let her works bring her praise at the city gate.
This means that a Godly woman was literally trading goods, buying and managing property, and raising a Godly family while her husband dealt with matters of State and other physical tasks.
Connor mentioned something in this segment that made me remember a very strange moment in my life. I'm not normally a very romantic, sentimental kind of person. I've never really been the type of woman to long for a husband and children, I haven't had loads of weird crushes on guys that never materialised. I've been quite direct with guys and they have with me.
However, one day just over 15 years ago, I turned up to a BBQ party at the parents of my friend's fiance. I knew about half of the people there, so as I walked up the path I wasn't concerned with who I might or might not see. Then, as I was about to go up the steps onto the patio, I saw the naked back of a man I didn't think I knew. And the weirdest thing ever, happened to me. I suddenly had this really bizarre moment where a sort of video played in my mind's eye, showing me a whole collection of moments in the future when I would be out with this man: the two of us celebrating Christmas, the pair of us eating at my favourite restaurant, a family wedding where we were both invited, me and him sat on an embankment watching motorcycle racing...
It. Was. Weird. Like...I hadn't met this guy at this point. I hadn't even seen his face. I knew from the back of his head that he wasn't someone I knew and then BAM my brain went into female bizarro mode, where it just sort of showed me that this was the guy I was supposed to be with, I was going to end up with, and these little videos from the future that were playing in my mind, were all going to come true. It was so disturbing at the time, that as I continued up those stairs onto the patio, I walked right past him without so much as glancing at him (I was too afraid to see what he looked like) and went about greeting a bunch of other people, with a smile plastered on my face to hide my discomfort.
It took me a good hour or so of downing half-pint glasses of wine and spirits in ridiculous amounts. I had to be drunk before I could go anywhere near him...and I've never been shy or coy around guys, so this was really throwing me for a loop. All that potential future with this guy that had played in my mind like a film reel...that notion that this was something I needed to make happen...it made me decide to just walk right up to him, get his attention and make sure it was me he was going to give his number to that night. It's like Connor's little theory of a woman having to feel as though she has some kind of of prior investment in a guy before she'll consider going out with him...only more intense. And this guy was seriously cute. Walking around in shorts the whole time, leaping in and out of the pool, the kind of hard, toned, muscled body you can only get from working outside in real jobs...tanned from being outside for those aforementioned jobs...tall, dark haired, strong jawed...yeah, there were other women trying to hone in on this guy who basically spent the whole day and evening with a naked glistening torso from never fully drying off.
But he came home with me that night. Not in that way. The last bus to where he lived was well gone and he was just planning on throwing his coat down in a field and sleeping under the stars. But I couldn't have that. I offered him my sofa (I wasn't worried because a/ I knew he wasn't going to be a bad dude and b/ I shared a flat with a very burly male friend) so he came back to my place and we sat up all night chatting about absolutely everything, being very personal about previous relationships and our current red-lines...it was as if we both knew this was going to go somewhere and had to make sure we were both on the same page.
We became friends immediately, started dating a fortnight later and after a month he moved in. He's been here ever since. And you know what? All the scenarios I'd played out in my head about where we'd both be together in future? They've all happened. Exactly as I imagined they would. So despite not having at all planned it, my brain did that little thing of imagining a future scenario (or 4) which made me see my other half as the one who was destined to be my future lobster. Maybe we simply can't help doing it when it's supposed to be, but some of us misinterpret that as something we should be looking for, before every potenial date or interaction?
I don't know. It just made me smile when Connor described that behavioural habit in women, because before I met my other half, I was never like that. It was only that one time when it did sort of happen, that I ended up finding my other half, the love of my life. Weird huh?
Really interesting. People say you shouldn't believe in fate or premonitions, or a 'sixth sense', but sometimes I really wonder...
That's some final destination stuff right there. Minus the gory deaths.
There used to be a name for that: "woman's intuition."
Before the sexual revolution, women would be patient, and play their cards close to their chest, so to speak. They followed the advice of song of solomon, not pursuing love until it reached a boiling point. Letting themselves listen to their mature intuition and emotions.
That's a beautiful, feminine story. Cherish it. Don't let anyone make you feel weird for your feminine feelings and intuition; they're beautiful. And I am sure yer man agrees, haha. Good luck you two
@@skinnysnorlax1876 It's like the poster above said: it feels like some "Final Destination" weirdness (sans mounting death tolls, lol) but what you've just said there about 'feminine intuition' makes sense. Even if it was just my subconscious operating on a very logical level, somehow noting that from behind I could see from his back that he was tall (I'm 5 ft small) so that would be a biologically sound target if seeking a mate (taller guy genes make the most of my short chick genes, plus taller guy is bigger and stronger and able to protect midget woman + offspring) maybe it was my brain concocting ways of making me feel I needed to be drawn to him to pair up most optimally, thus the "déjà voodoo, future view woo," mentally concocted reasoning designed to make me think I was definitely pursuing Mr Right. I don't know. But there has to be some kind of rational, logical reason behind it...even if it just sounds like a cute story when if I leave it alone and accept it as some kind of "fait accompli" shenanigans. Either way, I ain't complaining because I got my Mr tall, dark & handsome protector....and he got his pintsized #SandwichBroad who does his washing and is currently drawing 3-3 in our games of Trivial Pursuit, lol.
@@bad-girlbex3791 that's cute as hell lol. But if it puts your mind at ease, your brain is taking in billions of points of data every second and processing it at a subconscious level. Who knows how many rational conclusions it makes every second?
“It’s a matriarchy??”
“Always has been…”
This reminds me of Fiddler on the Roof. They were a very conservative traditional Jewish community and man was definitely head of the household on paper. In reality it was shown many many times just how much power the wife had in running the show. So much so you wondered if the man was really the head.
"The man is the head, but the wife is the neck, and she can turn him wherever she wants" -my big fat greek wedding.
Great line, honestly. It shows the kind of supporting position women have, and how they can leverage that. If the two adults are cognizant of that dynamic, it's fine. One of my old mentors put it this way: "the women control the direction in a relationship, but men control the pace."
Basically, the more sensitive party (and I don't mean that in a necessarily negative way) will always have a say on the direction the family is headed, whereas the main working unit is going to control how quickly they get there.
Societally speaking, men hold the tv remote, but women decide what's on and when it's too loud.
I had a terrifying revelation the other day. The thing that explains why decadent societies (like late Rome) always fail.
I was explaining "trophic cascades" (the wolves in Yellowstone thing) to my mom. There's this thing called an *ecology of fear* that fundamentally alters behavior. Without the fear of wolves, elk and deer went nuts wrecking the environment... and importantly *culling the population didn't help*. It was the change in behavior from lack of fear. And of course that reverted when we put wolves back in the forest.
Anyway about humans. We have no outside forces to fear. We killed them all. Therefore, there is no impetus for women to seek men for protection. This fundamentally alters behavior. This is the root cause of mass family breakdown which always predicts societal breakdown. It's not just people getting soft from a gentle life - it's a profound shift in psychology.
Why is this terrifying? Because for the first time EVER this is GLOBAL. I genuinely don't think civilization will survive this. Also the solution is concerning - introducing opportunistic predators to force people to be inside or travel in groups... initiating an impetus to form social bonds (particularly between the sexes). The HELL would that look like?
Humans aren't evolved enough for civilization.
Someone replied to this recently about provision being a valid replacement of protection. To which I replied how women out-earn men now and the anti-male agenda is continuing to accelerate. We're fucked.
Yeah. I think we are far more vulnerable than we are aware of. How many modern people would survive if the grid went down for 2 months? Do they know how to find clean sources of water? How to get their own food? One large solar flare could make the world as we know it disappear in an instant and people act as if nothing bad will ever happen again.
Well, let's just make everywhere Africa or the ME, if you know what I mean. Surely, when low IQ, violent, sociopathic men roam the streets in packs, women will again seek the protection and comfort of a civilized man. Indeed, I believe places like France and Sweden will see that come to fruition in the next decade.
Personally, I chose such a life without needing the influence of fear, but rather because I saw that it would be better not only for my family, but for society as a whole; and I quite love my country, so I would prefer it to succeed. Guess I'm just more (or feminists would say less) evolved than modern strong independent women who don't need no man lmao
There was definitely never a "patriarchy" in the culture I grew up in. In fact, it was other WOMEN that enforced women to maintain their roles. For example, if a woman wasn't taking care of her kids properly, the other women of the area would get a bunch of switches and set them by the offending woman's door. This was a warning that if she didn't straighten up, the other women were going to beat her. Husbands typically had little say in household affairs, so if his wife was lazy and didn't take care of him, the other women would take care of her. Not him. On the other side, if a man wasn't taking care of his home and family or was abusive, the area women might arrange for him to "disappear". My great grandmother once said "If a man hit me once, I might forgive him. If he ever hit me again...well...he has to go to sleep sometime, don't he?"
This is the most realistic take about this I have heard this far.
@@BertoxolusThePuzzled the women of my great-grandmothers time were so much stronger than modern women. I'm grateful I got to know her.
What region/culture is this?
This sounds like utter fiction
as I keep saying, if feminism's 'the patriarchy' exists, feminism wouldn't.
Reminds me of reading academic papers in the times I had to go to university. When you go out into the real world such nonsense is realised as nonsense. But when you are absorbed in the university industrtial complex you don't realise it is nonsense. Or people are propagandised to believe the nonsense wholeheartedly.
Universities have a lot to answer for.
We should not be forced to subsidize these unreality bubbles.
Make Academia scholarly again!
I always give folks I mentor, especially creative types, two questions to ask themselves when presented with new ideas and info. 1) is this bullshit? 2) could someone be profiting off of saying this?
1) seems obvious but many people are very trusting, and find it unpleasant to think critically because....well because it's critical. 2) is not necessarily going to teach you anything about the content of what someone is saying, but it can help with the context. If someone is profiting off of reasonable and accurate info I don't mind supporting it. It's why I am here
My parents are Korean. The traditional Korean culture is one of the most patriarchal cultures in the world. Women get no say. They end up being servants to their husband’s families. Thankfully, it’s not like this anymore because some mother-in-laws protect their daughter-in-laws from the fate they suffered.
I laugh hysterically when Western women complain about the patriarchy. I’ve never seen so much doting on women and girls in my life. You could argue that there’s a level of infantilization that happens which is demeaning to women but many Western women often use it to their advantage so 🤷♀️.
I’m not really sure what everyone is complaining about in the West. There’s other cultures where women are treated much worse. It’s like they’re so privileged, they complain.
That is exactly what happened. Something to note is that most of the original movements weren't started or populated by people who actually had to work for a living, but rather by the wives and daughters of the wealthy who's families had servants to do all the normal work so that they could lounge about doing nothing in particular which, as we all know, is the cruellest form of oppression.
It is beyond infuriating to me how feminists keep pretending that Western [birthing persons] have it as bad as [birthing persons] under Sharia/Islamic enclaves, yet do *absolutely nothing* to alleviate that barbaric state of affairs in the Islamic world. The only real would-be reformers come from within those Islamic societies themselves, and they almost invariably end up martyred for trying. *_And every time that happens, Western feminists stay silent._* Worse, when that culture of wanton abuse and rapine ends up imported, they not only ignore the actual victims of what they [falsely] claim was already happening on a daily basis in the West, _they move Heaven and Earth to defend the criminals for the dumbest reasons imaginable._
This has only ever been a game of self-serving oneupsmanship for these spoiled brats. And such hubris causes the universe itself to cry out for a cosmic reckoning...
@@handles_are_a_bit_rubbish
The hubris and incandescent malice of the Suffragettes knew no bounds. We as a society need to start curbing this crap more.
Korea sounds based
I doubt the validity of the claim that Korea was virulently patriarchal.
Seems to me what people refer to as patriarchy is usually closer to equality from a non-gynocentric perspective.
13:53 - it’s not wrong. What’s wrong is that she’s framing it as a negative.
The hormones really do a number on me and often the baby demands food even if I don’t want to eat lol. But I don’t think of my baby as a parasite. It’s such a weird feeling to be two people in one body. I willingly give over my body to my child. It’s not fun I’ll tell you that. But it’s what makes me feel uniquely female.
And I do feel like I’m connected to humanity - the past and the future - by carrying a child. I continue the line of my ancestors into the future. It’s my duty to not forsake their sacrifices.
I find it fun!
Some parts suck. The brain fog is 100% negative (though I do try to make a joke of it). The exhaustion. The smell sensitivity (I already gave a weak stomach without being pregnant, bummer). The random aches and pains. When your joints get loose and it feels like your body is about to fall apart like a skeleton in a game collapsing into a pile of bones. The insomnia. And on and on.
But some parts are super duper duper fun, like feeling the baby move. Like when the baby kicks me so hard in the middle of the night that I jump awake. The crazy vivid dreams. Laughing at, while simultaneously feeling bad for, my husband because every time he tries to feel the baby move it kicks a different spot or stops moving all together. Being extra spoiled by my husband as the baby grows. And the best part, hearing the baby's first cry, that is truly the most fun and absolutely an unforgettable moment.
It becomes so obvious when she starts talking about sex that she’s just a lesbian projecting her revulsion onto all women 😂
She was most likely sexually abused by her father, it's commonplace for someone to hate the opposite gender when the one that is supposed to protect you, abuses you.
I have a fun game everytime I see a Lotus Eaters video title and guess who's doing it.
This one just screamed Carl and Connor.
Connor really shines on these topics.
Andrew Tate said it best. Only young men can bring about the revolution. A group of young women will truly never change anything.
Except shame gullible young men into enlisting in World War 1, and continue to hector them even when they manage to come home maimed or crippled by the most pointless conflict in human history. (Seriously, look up the White Feather movement some time.)
Women are hiveminded.
Men are rebellious.
So correct.
Women and men have always held authority in difference spheres.
The problem is women voluntarily relinquished theirs as part of the feminism movement, and men have kept theirs.
The housewife is worth more than the house.
Can't always replace a house
My gran born in 1902, worked as a young child married at 17, had 11 children and worked right up till she got a pension at 60. She did some house cleaning for another 6 years when she was moved out after a slum clearance project. She knew real poverty but never complained about woman’s rights etc. all she was worried about was, paying the rent, food on the table and keeping away from doctors and hospitals.
the devil's greatest trick was to convince you he didn't exist
Spot on Carl. Rejecting a woman...nothing upsets them more than that. I've seen the wolves come out a number of times. Not a pretty sight.
I've read many scriptures from different religions and warning about women is universal.
There's probably a reason for it.
As much as I dislike Islam, they were mostly right about women
👍🏽
Not just religions, but philosophies too.
No two philosopher seem to agree on any one point, except one......
Saw and article once, it’s said up to 30% of homeless people are women.
Which I thought was an odd way of saying 70% of homeless people are men.
I would love to see a study and discussion about the role women play in warfare. If you read the accounts of people before and during wartime and accounts from tribal societies, a pattern begins to form. Women essentially force men to go to war by emotional and sexual blackmail, in almost every case.
If women truly cared about socialism then we would already have it.
It is kind of like the she says that men have "biological privilege" when it is clear from an evolutionary view men have earned it by being on the front lines of putting ourselves at risk.
echoes of the suffragettes' 'white feather campaign'.
I don't have anything personal against Beauvoir, but I think she is ignoring the tradeoff that men get to be used as infantry fodder, and considering that she published this shortly after WW2, that's not an excusable oversight. Sometimes it's better to have your power behind the scenes and off the record.
She also clearly never went to volunteer to aid the wounded men.
@@elliottgaal9774 Probably not. But the French experience of the war was different.
Beauvoir's main problem is that she is a minefield of having her cake and eating it too.
@@josephfisher426 She's the worst of both total detachment from reality and hubris
Simone de Beauvoir is where I can use the c-word with no hesitation.
She is a banshee that is very good of mental gymnastics. She might be one of the few cases where "witch-burning" is such a justifiable form of punishment for being as she is such a shameless liar believing her BS.
@Captain McDog That works too =D
It's like some R rated fantasy.
Full of gratuitous grapes 😋
*if feminism's 'the patriarchy' exists, feminism wouldn't.*
She's writing as though she's talking about all women, but I think she's actually just talking about herself without realising it.
When she says that females endure coitus and gain nothing from motherhood, it should read _'I_ endure coitus and _I_ don't see anything to gain in becoming a mother'.
She also says something about some women having excessive androgens causing more masculine features. Again I think she's probably speaking about herself and it would help explain the above; she might just have messed up hormones and a resulting poor relationship with herself as a woman that combined is making her mentally and physically less inclined towards sex and motherhood, and perhaps resentful of the fact that she's a masculine woman rather than a man.
If that's the case then this (her worldview and writings) might be a cope in which she tells herself that all women's lives suck and not just hers.
This sounds quite reasonable and insightful, I say.
Let's finally admit this. Giving right to a group who perceives they are oppressed because they are of a different sex IS A GRAVE MISTAKE. TIME TO TAKE IT AWAY.
Take a shower and get out of your mum’s basement
@@shrekt864 stop simping for ungrateful people like that bat 💩 banshee.
Just to be clear I utimately talk of unearned privileges. And a good chunk of their "rights" are really unearned if you consider the history and context. Still, for all their "progress", these UNGRATEFUL WITCHES wanted more. They are for supremacy, it was never about equality.
Projection. Bitterness. She's never had a good lover.
Or to put it differently: Patriarchy always existed in order to protect women (and yes, this includes Islamic patriarchy).
Admittedly, Islam doesn't prohibit as many behaviors towards women as I'd like, but you're not wrong. Hard to be a target when surrounded by men who'll fight for you.
Yeah. Supposedly to protect us from men.
@@marisaera2353 Not exclusively, but to a large extent. Man is the wolf of man after all :)
Nice to see you dealing w the real issue of our times (the WQ)
I believe the academic term for this viewpoint is to ‘cope and seethe.’
Imagine seeing biology and sex as nothing more than a power game. How hollow, how pathetic, how absolutely reductionist.
Pretty sure that ancient Greek stories tell that it was the *women* of Athens who voted to make Athena the patron goddess of the city.
to destroy families, you need to change women first. What happened is that women's idea of everything got inverted, and we see the result of that. plain and simple.
Sartre's hunted expression says it all. His finest payback was to enrage Simone when he reconciled to the Catholic Church on his deathbed.
The way that femenism weirdly elevates the concept and collective of "Men" to almost godhood(a tyrannical god ofc, but still by their own description something almost omnipotent and able to dictate the direction of society and history at our whims), while at the same time showing such contempt and looking down on the individual man is kinda baffling!?
It has got to be weird to have this kind of worldview and at the same time be so insistent that "Men" are the ones that have "Othered" women, troughout the whole of time none the less :p
Cognitive dissonance turned up to 11 I guess, but still strange and nonsensical...
Honestly, for some of these women, it is probably a good thing they are not having children.
In French, we have a word for women like de Beauvoir: "mal baisée"
That woman clearly never reed much into history, like the monoglian empire, or when Rome gave women the right to vote and they held quite a bit of power for some time.
The idea that men were worried about the economic power of women as Agriculture was becoming a thing is...insane. They also forget things like witch hunts mostly killed men.
The title should have been "Real Patriarchy has never been tried before. Real Patriarchy would work"
Why are women now oppressing and holding down other women in this "liberated" era?
That's the question I want answered.
Any woman who thinks the power differential is in the man's direction has never actually had any power over a man.
True Patriarchy has never been tried.
The subject of this segment is one of many (especially in recent times) that reminds me of the German fairy tale of The Fisherman and His Wife. When it comes to those who complain about The Patriarchy®, whatever you give them will never be enough and your effort will be wasted in trying to appease them.
And as time goes on, you wonder more and more why you don't just come home with an "offering" of lead.
Because the revolution must be continual. As James Lindsey said at oxford "woke culture has not gone too far because it cannot go too far." These folks want the status quo to be perpetual revolution
They feel free to say this stuff because nobody ever checks them on their sh1t
Or those who do get silenced.
Every time I hear about "da patriarchy", all I can think of is Galatea (The Authentic Observer) talking about how the coal mining towns that her family came from functioned. The men were the breadwinners, sure, but 1) they faced absolute horrors in the mines, from explosions to poisonings, and 2) women controlled the money that the men earned. Women made the money that the men earned stretch enough to feed, clothe, and house the family, all while taking care of the children and the home. That's not an easy task, and pretending that the women who did that were just subservient idiots who were unable to affect anything is fucking ridiculous. Even the BIBLE has passages that explain how women always did have power and influence in society. Imagine thinking that we live in a society that is more repressive than societies 2000+ years ago.
Life was always very, very hard, and both men and women took up roles that made the things that needed to happen a bit more manageable. Just because women tended to stay at home doesn't mean that they never had any power or influence in society. Women spearheaded many parts of the abolitionist movement in Britain, for example. They refused to buy sugar produced on plantations where slaves were used, which heavily impacted the ability of those plantations to operate. The control of money makes women much more powerful and influential than feminists would like you to believe.
None of what I said even applies to the situation we're in today, where I think it's very clear that women are at a distinct advantage. The courts, societal pressures, all sorts of things are plainly favoring women over men, to the point where men are villainized and made out to be complete monsters. It's all based on a lie, and that French bitch was a big part of why it started.
Even though I'm an Atheist, at times like this I'm reminded of the wisdom of the Ancient Peoples who believed that all of "Gods" main powers came from the Spoken Word. Like Genesis, where everything "God" does in the creation (except perhaps the very first act of creating the world entirely) is done by Speaking. "And God Said." "And God Said." "And God Said." etc. And the power "God" gave to Adam was to Name all the creatures.
And here we have an example of someone utterly twisting and perverting language to the point where it is more destructive to our society than any physical weapon that humans could ever devise.
I'm starting to realise that when it comes to women...... Ancient men knew something we long forgot.