@@thinkingai6017 Well we departed Rome in winter with minimum fuel to get to Cannes (just a 30 ?? minute flight). So density altitude was below sea level wich gives you incredible performance.
@@thinkingai6017 For a few moments you can get 10.000+ fpm climb rate, although airspace has to be clear and you really have to watch you rapidly decreasing air speed.
I see the Falcon 2000 making the LTN to TEB trip with occasional stops @ YYT, especially if departure is LBG. I realize that these are probably the EX version, but I never seem to track any of the Challenger versions crossing the Atlantic.
Both fantastic planes.
I flew the 300 from 2008 till 2011 .. love that rocket ship, brake release to FL200 in 4 minutes 🚀
I can believe it. I often see CL30’s doing 4,500 and 5,500 fpm climbs, albeit for a short while but they are rocket ships.
@@thinkingai6017 Well we departed Rome in winter with minimum fuel to get to Cannes (just a 30 ?? minute flight). So density altitude was below sea level wich gives you incredible performance.
@@thinkingai6017 For a few moments you can get 10.000+ fpm climb rate, although airspace has to be clear and you really have to watch you rapidly decreasing air speed.
I flew the Challenger 300 from 2008 till 2011. I love that rocket ship …. brake release to FL200 in 4 minutes 🚀
Would be interesting to have video on engine maintenance programs.
I see the Falcon 2000 making the LTN to TEB trip with occasional stops @ YYT, especially if departure is LBG. I realize that these are probably the EX version, but I never seem to track any of the Challenger versions crossing the Atlantic.
At 3:20 you reversed the purchase price comparison.
Isn't the Falcon 2000 outdated ? But i guess nothing like it in looks & flying dynamics !