The node of "communication" is a hole in Scientological theology. The emphasis on "communication" is basically the same as the theory of modern communication sciences, which negates the recursive nature of language - language assumes the interlocutee is also a recursive language user, so the two sides are always trying to "converge" on the same concept. That's why words are always being debated. "Communication" as a science can't account for this constant development and so most modern theories on "human communication" are very stale. Ayn Rand's Objectivist Epistemology also failed to see language as continually shifting, like an open wound that's always under repair. Human relations have a more significant issue - recursive violence - which was at the heart of Hubbard's theology, particularly nuclear apocalypse. Everyone knows that human relations have this same issue - a hole that is constantly under repair. Animals don't have this issue. Language is a way to continually repair this hole, and it uses the same recursive function as that in violence. But if you emphasize "communication" then you can't see any of this. The emphasis on communication might simply a byproduct of the thought kernel at its base. Scientology prides itself on improving the individual but you're going to be severely restricted if you're emphasizing "communication" instead of "language."
Why would you say you know reality if you can’t control it. According to this, scientology has an understanding of reality but you also claim that to know something is to gave control over it then why don’t you control reality. Also, if one point of a triangle is more important and is the foundation of the other points then it has no reason to be a triangle and lost the symbolism of a trinity
The node of "communication" is a hole in Scientological theology. The emphasis on "communication" is basically the same as the theory of modern communication sciences, which negates the recursive nature of language - language assumes the interlocutee is also a recursive language user, so the two sides are always trying to "converge" on the same concept. That's why words are always being debated.
"Communication" as a science can't account for this constant development and so most modern theories on "human communication" are very stale. Ayn Rand's Objectivist Epistemology also failed to see language as continually shifting, like an open wound that's always under repair.
Human relations have a more significant issue - recursive violence - which was at the heart of Hubbard's theology, particularly nuclear apocalypse. Everyone knows that human relations have this same issue - a hole that is constantly under repair. Animals don't have this issue. Language is a way to continually repair this hole, and it uses the same recursive function as that in violence.
But if you emphasize "communication" then you can't see any of this. The emphasis on communication might simply a byproduct of the thought kernel at its base. Scientology prides itself on improving the individual but you're going to be severely restricted if you're emphasizing "communication" instead of "language."
You know if you move the triangles in looks like the star of david. Are you sure this doesn’t secretly have to do with judaism
There is no star of David.
my name is hikma from ethiopa i have 1 quwestion where is scientology religion in ethiopa plz aske me
Hello Hikma, we don't currently have a location in Ethiopia, but we do have free online courses you can do! Here is a link: www.scientologycourses.org
10 q ❤❤@@scientology
AH ok ok. I’m learning I’m trying
I am on this course right now. Relationships mentions this.
Wonderful to hear. Yes, the ARC Triangle is very fundamental in Scientology!
I love to be a Scientologist…. It is great for us and it is great for everybody
He doest want me JanesSelena me dominichris doesnt want me
Why would you say you know reality if you can’t control it. According to this, scientology has an understanding of reality but you also claim that to know something is to gave control over it then why don’t you control reality. Also, if one point of a triangle is more important and is the foundation of the other points then it has no reason to be a triangle and lost the symbolism of a trinity
好棒喔🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼
谢谢！
Hey Mr David, thank you for this knowledge.
NICK MACK IS HERE
I'm glad to see positive vibes in the comments😊😊
TU, Diamante!
I love this symbol it's a great constant reminder
Good video, makes sense
😭 I miss the org so much.