Will they be expanding the waterfront development eastward (e.g., south of Fisher's Landing) or will it be more confined to closer to downtown area? Thanks! Very informative.
Good question! As far as I know right now they are working on the downtown area only. A lot of the waterfront down that way is residential and they also have to deal with the railroad as well.
@@realtorcas oh, your right, I confused Vancouver,wa with Portland. I also confused the United States with Afganistan. I'm just easily confused, you got me!
@@jb-cp4ye So, what you're saying, without saying it, is you don't like change. Too bad, the change had happened, it's happening and will continue to happen. Vancouver, WA will be a place where more affluent people visit and live and that will be a good thing.
![Vancouver’s Not for Everyone. Here’s Why. - [Living in Vancouver]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xii00cWx6kg/mqdefault.jpg)
Will they be expanding the waterfront development eastward (e.g., south of Fisher's Landing) or will it be more confined to closer to downtown area? Thanks! Very informative.
Good question! As far as I know right now they are working on the downtown area only. A lot of the waterfront down that way is residential and they also have to deal with the railroad as well.
All we saw was needles and begging and homeless...
Why would anyone move there and pay $$?
Well when was the last time you were here... and are you sure you haven't mixed up Portland and Vancouver?
@@realtorcas oh, your right, I confused Vancouver,wa with Portland.
I also confused the United States with Afganistan.
I'm just easily confused, you got me!
@@jb-cp4ye So, what you're saying, without saying it, is you don't like change. Too bad, the change had happened, it's happening and will continue to happen. Vancouver, WA will be a place where more affluent people visit and live and that will be a good thing.