@@seong-cheolhuh8304 If it were subject to the Y2K bug, then the equipment was made many years prior to year 2000. Why is Nanox operating such an obsolete equipment, if the 8-K filing describes this fake Fab as "a highly advanced fabrication plan?"
@@RichardXRoe Old doesn't necessarily mean obsolete. The Nanox.SOURCE is not for information processing, but for emitting electrons to produce X-rays, and thus doesn't require nm resolution during manufacturing. Nanox brought the right machines for the job and has saved a lot of money by that, and will use that save d money to deploy the ARCs.
@@seong-cheolhuh8304 Ok, maybe just old and cheap, but it is definitely not a "highly advanced fabrication plant," so the press release and the 8-K were fraudulent. On a side note, you do realize that the new Fab can't make any Nanox.SOURCE chips, right? The Fab does not have dicing equipment, so the only thing it will be making is defective wafers.
@@RichardXRoe Says the guy who can't even get Nanox's capitalization properly in the name of his blog. What company is "NaNOx" supposed to be anyway? You're the fraud. SK says that Nanox can produce the chips, and any day I'm going to buy SK's words over some disgruntled midlife crisis man-child short on the internet.
나녹스 할수있습니다.👍 회사를 믿고 시간에 투자합니다.
FDA approval is likely right for the multisource if the single source one got approved?
20달러 언제오나요?
Yes we sCan!
We go together
Quite fake - the obsolete equipment used shows the video was filmed nearly 100 years ago, on February 14, 1922.
The date is set that way to avoid the Y2K bug.
@@seong-cheolhuh8304 If it were subject to the Y2K bug, then the equipment was made many years prior to year 2000. Why is Nanox operating such an obsolete equipment, if the 8-K filing describes this fake Fab as "a highly advanced fabrication plan?"
@@RichardXRoe Old doesn't necessarily mean obsolete. The Nanox.SOURCE is not for information processing, but for emitting electrons to produce X-rays, and thus doesn't require nm resolution during manufacturing. Nanox brought the right machines for the job and has saved a lot of money by that, and will use that save d money to deploy the ARCs.
@@seong-cheolhuh8304 Ok, maybe just old and cheap, but it is definitely not a "highly advanced fabrication plant," so the press release and the 8-K were fraudulent. On a side note, you do realize that the new Fab can't make any Nanox.SOURCE chips, right? The Fab does not have dicing equipment, so the only thing it will be making is defective wafers.
@@RichardXRoe Says the guy who can't even get Nanox's capitalization properly in the name of his blog. What company is "NaNOx" supposed to be anyway? You're the fraud. SK says that Nanox can produce the chips, and any day I'm going to buy SK's words over some disgruntled midlife crisis man-child short on the internet.