5 Reasons Why Prime Lenses Are Better Than Zooms
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
- Head to squarespace.com/indepthcine to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code INDEPTHCINE
As is the case with all film gear, there are a number of reasons for and against using prime lenses versus selecting zoom lenses. In this video I’ll go over five reasons that make primes superior to zooms - and follow it up with a later video from the other side of the argument about why zoom lenses are better than primes.
5 Reasons Why Zoom Lenses Are Better Than Primes: • 5 Reasons Why Zoom Len...
MERCH:
Official IDC Merch: www.indepthcine.shop/
SOCIALS:
Instagram: / indepthcine
Patreon: / indepthcine
IDC Website: www.indepthcine.com/
My Website: www.graykotze.com/
Discord: / discord
GEAR:
UA-cam Gear I Use: kit.co/InDepthCine/youtube-gear
Editing Software I Use: bit.ly/2LZ60Lo
Music I Use: bit.ly/3E6o8c4 (CODE 'IDC10' for 10% off)
Stock Footage: bit.ly/3jZHBC0
Cinematography Gear I Use: kit.co/InDepthCine/cinematogr...
MUSIC: bit.ly/3jZHBC0
Gregor - 'Morning Breeze'
Quelche - 'Sound Garden'
Mozrt - 'Duality'
BP Moore - 'Galvanised'
JokkuJekku - 'Rising Above'
Port George - 'Ken'
Jameson Nathan Jones - 'As of Old'
Chill Winston - 'The Truth'
0:00 Introduction
1:19 1. Considered Perspective
2:53 2. Optical Quality
4:33 Squarespace
5:52 3. Aperture
7:09 4. Size
8:19 5. Focus
DISCLAIMER: Some links in this description are affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with these links I may receive a small commission without an additional charge to you.
Thank you for supporting my channel so I can continue to provide you with free videos! - Фільми й анімація
While in theory I prefer primes, in practice I prefer zoom as an indie filmmaker. Saves me much valuable time.
Facts
Because of those things, filmmakers tend to choose zoom lenses over prime lenses only if there is a need for zooming during rolling, or a constraint that force to choose zoom lenses like harsh conditions(desert, jungle, high altitude mountain without good logistics support), no camera assistant, or event video that needs no lens changing not to lose a frame during the event.
Or simply you dont want to bring your 53k arri alexa on the football pitch
@indepthcine I am an aspiring cinematographer and I wanna say that I look forward to watching your videos every Sunday. Great informative content 👍🏽
Very good argument and I cant wait to see the second presentation.
Definitely, what we choose, does depend on the project and the scenes, what they require, like you said, for a certain emotion of the character and what we are supposed to feel.
All great points and easy to understand thank you 😊
This guys videos are just always nice to watch. :)
1. Considered perspectiva
2. Optical quality
3. Aperture
4. Size
5. Focus
I’m curious what The Sandman on Netflix is using. It appears their using vintage anamorphics or a lot is accomplished in post? Would like your thoughts.
I could be completely wrong - but from what ive heard they are using heavily modified Lomo anamorphics and then up-squeezing them onto the new Sony Venice 8k sensor. if the rumors are correct it would sure explain the extreme look it has!
I'll just post a comment so I'm notified when someone replies
Hi. I really like the style of your videos. Do you have some kind of a breakdown of the process of editing them?
Great video as always
Thank you so much. Great learning ✨🙏🏻
As a beginner filmmaker, I prefer zoom lenses. It covers all my needs, and I don't afraid to damage the camera matrix exposing it somehow. And I can try different focal distances and see the effect immediately.
Great video, thanks 🙏😎
I mean most zoom cine lenses are parafocal now... Primes have their specific use it seems like. But for me, it doesnt make sense, which is why I use zooms lol. its all about speed and efficiency with your clients.
I love the photography, and at first i was interested in a cheap camera (Canon EOS1300D) and its lens 18-55mm. But I realized, that mostly I used 18mm or 55mm. Then I bought a Tamron 70-300mm lens. Quite cheap for a tele-zoom. But I realized, that mostly I used 300mm. And at least f4.0-f5.6 necessary.
Now I changed to a Fujifilm X100V with a fixed prime lens and I love it. I have to move closer or further away to get a picture the way I want it. And now I can use an aperture f2.0.
Did the same but without buying the 70-300mm. Now it's a prime 50mm, a standard zoom Sigma 28-70 or 24-70 with f2.8, a wide zoom or perhaps a 40mm for street photography. Thinking of the lens choice is the easiest way to set a style to what you shoot
I’m with you on the f-stop capabilities and focus range, and I always appreciate In Depth Cine videos…but I think “better” is a little subjective here. 🤔
As someone else mentioned here, the need to swap lenses can be a real drag (or a liability) depending on shooting conditions, imo light diffraction can sometimes be a positive thing if used intentionally, and intentional placement/framing (while more easily subconscious with primes) is an important choice regardless of lens. More of a mindset difference than an objective, kit difference.
I would have said “5 things prime lenses do better than zoom lenses,” but I know that’s not quite as catchy of a video title. 😂
Anyway, please keep up the interesting and informative work! Always curious to hear your thoughts on anything film-related. 😊
My dude said like 4 times he was gonna go over the other side of the argument too lol
"Less glass --> Less diffraction" cannot be true, can it? You did not really mean diffraction, but some other word. Scattering or flaring maybe. Diffraction is a fundamental property of light waves and occurs when light encounters an obstruction or aperture. The impact of diffraction is determined by the aperture size rather than the amount of glass in the lens.
6:22 - what do you mean... those two things don't seem to relate... it's literally a piece of metal curling.. how does that relate to the complex design of glass in a different part of the lens?
I like both of them. It really depends on size. Cine lenses are more fun as primes but i have never actually tried zoom cine lens
This one is for the pro's :
At a given focal length, say 50mm for example, what is the difference in image quality for a shot taken on a zoom vs a prime?
I mean there’d be less distortion and chromatic aberration on the prime. You’d also get a shallower depth of feild on the prime. The zoom would definitely be softer with less creamy bokeh.
I HATE those who make using only primes seem like a selling point for their photo/video work...like if you have a 24-70 f2.8 and a 70-200 f2.8 you're ready for nearly any job and will have plenty of background blur if you want it. Primes are just extremely limiting in many shoot scenarios.
There's no going around that with primes get way nicer photos as they have wider aperture and are sharper (and often have less distortion etc). You'll survive well with the zoom, but just compare the photos taken with very wide aperture sharp primes to standard 2.8 ''fast'' zoom. Primes have clear advantage in when taking art photos. If I went to a football match then my number 1 choice would be a zoom
@@zen933 For weddings and other jobs where you don't have full control or are shooting in small rooms etc. I just wouldn't ever want to be fumbling around with lens swaps. I think especially for video work the sharpness you get from a good 2.8 zoom is more than you will ever need. You can miss shots in plenty of cases using primes. Unless I'm planning most of the shots I will need (like a narrative film shoot) then I would always choose the two zooms over like 5 primes.
Stills that are just portraits are a different matter I suppose, and primes would suit that kind of scenario for sharpness and that little extra DOF.
Agreed sambo
Guys I have some shooting ahead of me… I’m afraid my iPhone11 is not really good at it… especially at night scenes, but I don’t know how to operate a camera at all and they are pricy to loan…
How can I improve the image at iPhone 11??
Not a cinematographer or anything related to film making, but what you probably want to do is have a very very soft lighting on the cast and parts of the environment you want visible. Put like a sheet of bed cover or something over a strong light to soften it.
Besides that, I have no clue. Maybe also try and find an area there that has good light source or at one in the scene or photo, like a those lamps used for camping or a candle.
@@prabeshgurung1067 yeah man, that’s sounds reasonable, I believe I should do my work in so far as setting the light right.
Gonna bring some kind of lamp to lighten the object or a person I shoot, also gonna try to create a nice background lighting in the room, smth soft and comfy.
But in the streets it’s more challenging cuz lights in my city are mostly yellow and not white. I hate this yellow lighting, makes the Colorof clothes and skin worse….
Gonna find a place in my city where the lights are white I guess. Also gonna buy a lamp that will give a white light and gonna bring it with me to the shooting.
Thanks for the reply, hopefully I ll make it
Jumping on this train too, don’t try to push the phone past what it can handle if the environment is still kind of dark. It’s better to look dark than dark and ugly. So have your talent close to your source so like lamps, windows, Christmas lights, what have you. And most important of all, make sure you’re getting good sound. The human brain is a lot likelier to settle for bad picture than bad sound. I cannot stress that sound thing enough.
24 or 35 for context, 50 for full/half body and 85 or 135 for close up
Why you gotta do 2.8s like that
Hi, how can you use film footage without getting copyright strike ?
The way the clips are being used would fall under "fair use" in copyright laws, because he is using them for the purpose of commentary, criticism and education. Its not like he's just posting the clips for people to watch the film for free, he is providing additional value to the footage
And also, it's just very short clips, with no audio, not entire scenes.
@@-Ryodan yeah but that doesn’t protect against automatic flagging
Try Sony 24-70mm GM ii lens first ✨
I have cine primes but shoot 95% with the canon 18 - 80mm zoom lens.
The primes are way better in picture quality, but for TV production, event or other cases, your move a lot like onetake commercial videos, the zoom winns about the quality and look.
Only in Musicvideos or high picture quality shootings, i never touched the zoom lens at all.
Bokeh isn't something you have more or less of, it's just the quality of the out of focus areas. It makes more sense to say "more background/foreground blur".
What do you mean? If you have f1.2 lens, you have more bokeh, out of focus area, than f4 lens
It is so confusing hearing camera lens specifications and zoom in metric and focus distance expressed in imperial
I like prime leases because it forces me to decide where the camera is gonna be - ROGER DEAKINGS
good video
I dislike using the term "zoom with your feet" It spreads misinformation since the change in position with a prime results in a different shot compared to zooming in with the lens.
Is that Gwen 💔??
Tell Wes Anderson not to use a zoom LOL. We never use them. I prefer the look of a prime. Always have.
1 reason zooms are better no need for the second camera assistant :) hahahah
personally i love zoom but if you need speed prime are the best but if you are in a real set you dont have exposir problem
cooke zoom are so beautiful
Second
These rules don’t really apply to recent zooms, which are just as sharp and light as prims with a minimal loss in light.
Could you link me to the data supporting this pls ?
@@OceanstaI think the website dxophotolabs has good info regarding that
Fourth
imagine being able to afford to look at arri lmao
First
Third
Fifth
They aren't
Why would you choose depictures of dps wearing useless masks????
first video on this channel I disliked, because of the intentionally incorrect clickbait title.
Sixth