INJECTIVE, SURJECTIVE, and BIJECTIVE FUNCTIONS - DISCRETE MATHEMATICS
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 тра 2015
- Looking for paid tutoring or online courses with practice exercises, text lectures, solutions, and exam practice? TrevTutor.com has you covered!
We introduce the concept of injective functions, surjective functions, bijective functions, and inverse functions.
#DiscreteMath #Mathematics #Functions
Support me on Patreon: bit.ly/2EUdAl3
Visit our website: bit.ly/1zBPlvm
Subscribe on UA-cam: bit.ly/1vWiRxW
-Playlists-
Discrete Mathematics 1: • Discrete Math (Sets, L...
Discrete Mathematics 2: • Discrete Math (Countin...
-Recommended Textbooks-
Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics (Grimaldi): amzn.to/2T0iC53
Discrete Mathematics (Johnsonbaugh): amzn.to/2Hh7H41
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (Rosen): amzn.to/3lUgrMI
Book of Proof (Hammack): amzn.to/35eEbVg
Like us on Facebook: on. 1vWwDRc
Hello, welcome to TheTrevTutor. I'm here to help you learn your college courses in an easy, efficient manner. If you like what you see, feel free to subscribe and follow me for updates. If you have any questions, leave them below. I try to answer as many questions as possible. If something isn't quite clear or needs more explanation, I can easily make additional videos to satisfy your need for knowledge and understanding.
Seriously... that's it?? Why was this to complicated when our professor taught it. Thank you so much!
My thoughts exactly. After struggling through bad lectures and cryptic textbooks these 5-10 minute videos make it as easy as addition and subtraction. No idea why this seems to be so hard to teach in most colleges.
Hahahhaha could relate!
Some truly can't teach jack* & shouldn't.
Universities and professors make it sooo complicated, these concepts seem so abstract and just confusing.
I don't even understand why university professors make it so complicated. Thanks to trev tutor he is my savior when exams come up.
I've got to say, you are far better than the professor I have for Discrete Math, it has everything to be quite the interesting, but some people just cannot teach. Anyway, thanks for the videos
+FMAPR I wish I could take his job :(
lol ))
Yes!
Totally agree! In youtube people make video because they like it, teacher teach only for money. That's why we found far better teacher on youtube than in our schools.
I disagree with the fact that you think teachers teach for money, but at any rate it is a really good video for DM.
Injective: 0:39
Surjective: 5:25
Bijective: 10:07
Life saver
Life saver
Discrete Math is so fun, when i can understand it
Thank you Sir, for helping me pass my exams
You are by far the best teacher of Discrete Math compared to any other youtube tutors as well as my Uni teacher
your university prof. wants to know your location.
@@amansinghbhadauria2818 haahhahaha
Watch organic chemistry tutor
İ'm trying to learn sth from the professor at the uni but it's impossible,because he cannot explain it clearly.You're doing a great job and now i'm starting to learn from your videos and it's really awesome.İ've never got functions before better than now.Thank you so much,maybe we can improve ourselves because of the person like you.
then he should be Phd holder ..
I have watched most of your Discrete Math tutorials. They are easy to understand and well arranged. I like your tone of voice which in not monotonous for a tutor. So Thank you and I hope you would develop more contents in the other areas. you greatly helped me in my last DM test.
i have to learn functions, uncountable vs countable sets, and relations in 2 days before my exam, wish me luck
+TheTrevTutor your videos are setting me up for Group Theory and Manifolds...can't tell you how much I appreciate your lectures. Thank you!
I'm so grateful for your existence in this world! You are best teacher of discrete math and you are saving my life!
Thank u so much ! I attended this cource twice with my teacher and I couldn't understand but I watched your video Once and I understand ..U just made things clear and easy going you deserve a big price!
I feel like I'm ascending to another plane when I watch these videos, you explain the same stuff as my lecturer but so much clearer
Been struggling to understand this for a few weeks now, this one video I accidentally found just explains it all. Thank you!!
Thank you my friend. Thanks to your channel, I've found the will to keep moving forward with my discrete math subject despite failing my first quiz. I hope I pass. Subbed.
you r a the best tutor i have ever seen in my life ,
Thanks!! This is really way more understandable and intuitive than what my professor had taught in class🤩
Thank you! May professor has a very strong accent that's hard to understand, this is helping tremendously.
Subscribed. Thanks for making such great quality videos. Really helping me with my Discrete Structures in Computing course
Tomorrow is my mid,and your videos are really gonna help me, your work should be appreciated teacher..thank u so much.
I’m ready for my final tmm. You explained it in such a easier way, thank you 🙏🏼
How'd it go?
The best video ever !! I am now crystal clear. Thanks.
I passed my math test all to you! Really really grateful for every single video you've done! 💟 credits to Trev for being very much helpful and kind to share these. Knowledge with us. 😭
Only Passed?
I have to say this is the complete solution of the topic. I haven’t seen this kind of video before. Thank you so much 😊
Thank you for all the videos, they're awesome!
Thank you so much my teacher is really bad and I was really stressing out about my homework. I scoured the internet for hours and you were by far the easiest to understand
:)
I know that this video was made in 2015 and its 2021, which is also ending, but all thanks to you TrevTutor, I was able to complete my assignments on time and receive distinction on the paper! Keep up the great work!
By the way Im watching this in 2022 .....its still far better than that of college professor and tons of videos available online just for wasting the time .
I watched this video and went back to my professors lecture notes. The first time I went through the notes, I felt like I only truly understood 60% of the material. After watching the video, I feel like I can now teach the course.
I love your writing ! Very well explained.
I came here for Set Theory but I stayed for the soothing voice and personality and comprehension of course!!! Thank you soooooo much! You are an absolute|😇!| This is the first time I retained Set Theory and even answered the questions before you said them!
I dont know why my lecturers are boring af but can listen to you for ages when you do your videos. They are actually engaging and not confusing
woooow! bro actually compared to how my lecturer teaches,i would say you are the best
and i cant imagn how you've made this topic look so easy,,, clearly u deserve this profession,,,thank you so much kip up same spirit
I have an exam tomorrow, and this is really helping me. Thank you!!
"x2 was just x1 in disguise". This sentence alone clarified everything to me. My private tutor couldn't explain it to me in an hour. I assumed that if we were to put different numbers like 1 and 2, the outcome will be different. so f(1) not equal to f(2). Now I understand that f(x2) can not be different, and that is essentially what we had to prove. Thank you very much.
Bro…. what, if only my professor was this good. Thank you. I finally understand and now I can move on to actually studying for my test.
You are doing a good thing, man. Thanks!
I just.. I wanna say.... I'm speechless, Man oh man I wish you a lifetime of happiness, you know I wish happiness rains on you to the level that you are struggling with swimming .
OMG THANK YOU! Now I truly understand this topic !!!
i always look for these videos when i don't understand something in class. He does such a good job of explaining things . #trevtutorforprez
U are such a good lecture..uv made me understand this concept,,thanks a great deal
wow this is the best .I now understand set theory.You are the best professor!
This is amazing, thank you so much!
any time i watch ur vidoe i feel very satisfied with your explanations ....
Thank you! Love from Viet Nam.
btw: good hand writting. I like it
My professor has tons of practice questions and explanations and I still couldn't understand how he was doing the injective proofs. I wish he had just prefaced from the start, like you did, that he is using the contrapositive of the definition of injection. I have my finals tomorrow in an introductory discrete math course and you might have just saved my grades, ty.
What a great explanation, thanks a lot man ❤
very understanding video. Thank you so much!
amazing! much better than my professor who explained this for 2 hours but still confused me
Nice and easy to comprehend lecture. thanks
I GOTTA SAY ....YOUR VIDEO LESSON WAS GREAT AND CLEARLY SO I LIKE IT.I'M GOING TO WAIT YOUR OTHER LESSONS.
you are an absolute god! You are better than my lecturer man!
Can you make more example solving videos? That'd be awesome. I really appreciate it.
Very helpful on my assignment to state that an equation is neither injective nor surjective, thank you
Hey, thank you. This is very helpful!
Thamkw soo much.....my cocept is pretty clear now....d videos are very helpful.......thanx 4 it....
Why do they have to make everything so difficult.
Thanks discrete maths for making my life easier.
Is the process for proving injective and surjective the same for piecewise defined functions? Only you have to do a case for each piece?
You rocked..cleared my biggest doubt..luv u
I was dreading to go through the book but then i recalled that there exist some guy called TheTrevTutor in the world. Thanks for saving my time through helpful videos. Keep Up.
I am happy i understand this before my exams on discrete math
Your videos are great and easy to understand but if you post some exercises on the discription it will be more helpful. 👍
Thanks for the video sir. I found it's helpful...!!
your are the Best teacher for this subject sir thanks Alot
May God massively bless you sir.
thanks alot sir you have just solved all my problems here
This math is so cool when it’s explained well like this
Love it! Thank you.
Why is y on the right and not the left in F: R->Z? You originally wrote y=x so I assumed that is the order. I'm going to have an exam so I would like to know if you just wrote it that way or if that's standard. Thank you so much!
Bro you nailed it. Now I am satisfied
Thanks for these videos, your channel deserves way more views and subs!
really great video! 1000x thanks
Thank you for the worksheets and solutions.
Thank you. Just thanks, man.
bro you're a badass tutor I wish I was as good a tutor as you
This was helpful. Thank you sir.
Thanks very much. your explanation is so good
The best explanation ever.
this helped alot thanks man!!...
Thanks you are so good . God bless you.
Sir I have one question please make video on it
as you have said we assumed x1=x2 then f(x1)=f(x2),,then in what case it will not satisfy the condition...I meant to say by this method how can we show a function is not injective
We love your work here in south Africa🇿🇦
THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR, FOR TAKING YOUR PRECIOUS TIME TO PRESENT THIS TUTORIAL. PLEASE SIR, I AM NEW TO THIS KIND OF MATHS, HERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS, I NEED YOUR HELP ON THIS ONE...
1. (a) The universal set is {1, 2, . . . 10}. Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7}, B = {2, 3, 4, 5, 8} and
C = {1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9}. Find the elements of the following sets:
(i) A∆B
(ii) (A ∩ B)
′\C
(b) Given the relation R such that R = {(m, n) ∈ R|m, n ∈ A, m2 − n ≥ 4} when A
is the set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4},
(i) express the relation R as a set of ordered pairs.
(ii) draw an arrow diagram to represent this relation.
(iii) investigate whether the relation is symmetric, transitive and/or reflexive.
(c) Determine if the following functions are one-to-one and/or onto and use these to
determine whether the function is a bijection. Assume both functions are such
where f : R → R.
(i) f(x) = 6x − 9
(ii) f(x) = x
2 − 2x + 1
Thanks. very helpful.
thanks a mil! great explanation!
Thank you so much!
I am so happy I found these
Okay, So if instead you were going from Z->R, in your example y-2/5= x how do you do that? I understand when its Z->Z or R->R, and R->Z makes sense because theres only a limited number of integers. but Z is everything except C numbers. so is it considered still onto? how would you do the math in the equation to prove it? [your vids rock even if i dont get everything]
My doubt is still related to the size of the domain. If I have a finite set A with unknown values, can I say it has a bijective relation to N because it is countable, or I can say it is countable only because it is surjective, because saying it is bijective would mean the size of N is the same as the size of A????
This material should go on Khan Academy since they don't have a discrete math course and these are excellent
At around 9:45, you say that with a domain of real numbers and a codomain of integers, it is surjective; however, some domain values will not even have a mapping/value. Doesn't this mean that it no longer qualifies as a function?
You can simply say co domain is subset of range.Or range(R)is bigger set than of co domain (Z).Hence That's not even a function.
Thanks a lot!!! Wish I had found you earlier
Man, you know i'm really reaching to enjoy math when I laugh at 1:12 when he says it's just x1 in disguise. Why was that funny... idk...
Everyone loves it when the killer is finally unmasked!
Thanks!! big help :D
Ur really good keep up the good work my g
nice tutorial,but could you please give solution to inverse of f(x)=5x+2?
Thank yu Sir
You are fantastic!
Good Job mate....Keep it up....nice video
So is it true that all surjective functions have a domain and co domain with the same cardinality? Or not because a function could have a one to many mapping?
All other discrete math videdos are trash.. these make sense!! Thank you!!
For the last example of the surjective proof for f(x)=5x+2, we wrote the function as y=5x+2, then rewrite the function in terms of x, so x=(y-2)/5. We lastly tried to prove if we mapped f:real->integers. This does work if we plug in for the function in terms of x, but if we plug in this mapping for the function in terms of y, then it is not possible. Should the mapping not work for the function in terms of a and y both when mapped f:real->integers ?