Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Reposting Fedora Benchmarks
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 сер 2024
- I am reposting the Fedora Benchmarks to use the default file system btrfs and I am doing it on hardware to compare the results with the Apple Mac Mini (M1), Ubuntu 23.10 and Debian 12
Mac Mini is running Asahi with Fedora KDE 39 (btrfs file system)
Lenovo X1 Extreme (Intel Core i7 9th Gen Mobile CPU) for
Fedora Workstation 39 (btrfs)
Ubuntu 23.10 (ext4)
Debian 12 (ext4)
Hardware
Mac Mini M1 - amzn.to/3NDQj9F
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme (Daily Driver Linux) - amzn.to/3PkSYpK
AMD Rysen Machine (Currently Unplugged)
Khadas VIM 3 - amzn.to/3NjJmt3
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano - amzn.to/3NcLpyZ
Odroid N2+
Raspberry Pi 4
Intel Nuc 10 - amzn.to/46e6l15
Intel Nuc 12 - amzn.to/3NCYxPj
Network
Aruba Instant On 1930 24-Port Gb Ethernet - amzn.to/46e6l15
Video Equipment
Panasonic GH6 Camera - amzn.to/3PoUKX1
Panasonic GH4 Camera
Blackmagic Design ATEM Extreme Pro ISO - amzn.to/3Pkma08
Blackmagic Design Hyperdeck Studio HD Mini - amzn.to/42JY5mt
Blackmagic Design Hyperdeck Shuttle - amzn.to/42Tdzoi
Blackmagic Design Cloud Pod - amzn.to/3qW14va
Audio Equipment
Shure SM7b - amzn.to/3qQ7Qm7
Universal Volt 276 - amzn.to/3Nfe9He
Software
Rogue Amoeba Audio Hijack 3
Rogue Ameoba Loopback
Blackmagic Design Davinci Studio 18 - amzn.to/43ZjPMm
Support me on Patreon: / djware
Follow me:
Twitter @djware55
Facebook: / don.ware.7758
Gitlab: gitlab.com/djw...
#fedora39 #Proxmox #VirtualMachines
I'll keep running Ubuntu as a 30 year Linux veteran, and let the kids keep flappin' their jaws about how it's "soooo laaaaame duuuuuude." 😏 Thanks for the video.
I guess you were able to make the first comment on this video because of the faster IO speeds of Ubuntu =)
@@johnandmegh HAH, you got it!
I really like Ubuntu since it serves as great starting point for introducing new users to the world of Linux without it being an overwhelmingly complicated and off-putting experience. The distro elitists can vehemently dislike it all they want, but without user-friendly distros like Ubuntu, many folks would never have gotten into using Linux in the first place.
@@yep596 I disagree. Newbies should dive head-first into the harder to use distros first while they have time to waste learning the fundamentals and ins and outs. These distros also usually have more problems, which will help them learn troubleshooting. Then when they're extremely knowledgeable and need to worry more about getting work done than diddling with operating system details all day, run something that's 1) stable, 2) performant, and 3) basically "just works" like Ubuntu.
I find it funny, kids trying to demean Ubuntu cuz "looool it's easy to use." Yeah, I remember decades ago, enjoying my harder to use, esoteric Linux box where I thought I was a "power user" by doing a bunch of trivial shit by hand. Then my balls dropped.
@@yep596 And realistically, as shown in cases like this, the benefit/effort assessment of working to get performance equal to/better than Ubuntu's has to account for how much Ubuntu puts in place for the user already. If endless tweaking is fun for you, then more power to you, but there's something to be said for a setup that mostly handles itself. And IMO 23.10 has knocked it out of the park - I installed it on an Intel CPU/Intel integrated system, an AMD CPU+Integrated/Nvidia GPU, and an Intel CPU/Nvidia GPU, and they are running really well with pretty easy setup for all three.
Thanks for the re-running. Always good to have more data on hardware 👍
Any time!
I'd be curious to see how Debian benchmarks with btrfs. I thought the performance issues have been resolved.
I wonder if with those results on Fedora btrfs the performance hit could also be saving battery even if you put it on performance mode compared to Debian and Ubuntu ext4s. Maybe Fedora btrfs is optimized for mobile stations like laptops. Again, just wondering since there wasn't a mention about battery/power consumption on those tests.
Have all my servers running in performance mode, the problem with btrfs is that it floods the kernel with sysreqs to create memory blocks for each write. It is very ineffient when writing or re-writing the disk
@@CyberGizmo wow, I'm a bit speechless that this isn't covered with a bit more frequency. This is basically the trade-off about using btrfs, we are losing performance. Given what you mentioned it could even be consuming more battery. Btrfs gives you compression, checksumming and snapshots BUT at a cost of performance. This is very informative thanks for the eye opening. You got a new subscriber
@@Berecutecu the last video I did where I benchmarked btrfs was the Fedora 40 video, and it did much better, so I think the fedora team is paying attention and trying to smooth it out, its still slower than the rest, but it is way better than this benchmark showed.
@@CyberGizmo yeah, I hope they improve things on the btrfs side. There are more and more distros making it available. I even saw Kubuntu now has it as an option during installation. It could even be a good contender to compare against Fedora KDE in your next benchmark videos. Just saying 😌
So what about Opensuse?
Wow fedora is last in every test wow.
Ugh, why is Fedora so much slower?
Because of the default file system choice, been harping on this for years, they don’t listen so I’m done telling them
@@CyberGizmocan we change this during installation?
@@seedney yes, you have to choose custom and layout the drive as you like with whatever filesystem you like from their choices
@@CyberGizmo sorry this may be a Linux newbie question but can it be changed after installation though? I couldn't bother to back up my disk just for this change
@@Scranny maybe, I have never tested this with btrfs, but it may be possible to use fstransform, I know this works for ext4 and xfs, here is the blog post about it: fedoramagazine.org/transform-file-systems-in-linux/
Make sure you backup everything before attempting anything like this.