Jaguar F-Type SVR review: British V8 muscle tested on road and track

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2024
  • Lighter, stiffer, faster, louder and considerably more expensive than any other F-Type to date, the new £110,000 SVR Coupe is, claims Jaguar, “the 200mph all-weather supercar”.
    It’s powered by a tweaked version of Jaguar’s established 5.0-litre supercharged V8, and boasts 568bhp, 700Nm of torque and a 0-62mph time of just 3.5 seconds. So the 200mph F-Type SVR is not just a skirts-and-spoilers job from Jaguar’s burgeoning Special Vehicle Operations division. They don’t do that sort of thing at SVO...
    Steve Sutcliffe thrashes the new Jaguar F-Type SVR on road and track to see if the flagship F-Type is just as good as the rest of the range.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 210

  • @nunosantos4948
    @nunosantos4948 3 роки тому +10

    That ZF 8 gearbox is fast enough, not half as slow as Steve says in the video!! I´Ve droven the cae and it is fabulous!! A absolute riot !

  • @Bestwick1983
    @Bestwick1983 8 років тому +66

    I realize the car could probably have been improved with the addition of a proper dual clutch gearbox but to say that the 8 speed ZF auto is "like a conventional auto" is an utterly ridiculous and widely disagreed with opinion.

    • @joelspaulding5964
      @joelspaulding5964 5 років тому +12

      Here we are two years later and that ZF 8-speed is still better than most.
      Suppose a 7 speed DCT could improve shift times but the ZF is almost as quick and rather solid

    • @v12-s65
      @v12-s65 Рік тому +2

      7 years later and here to tell you that the zf 8hp is still one of the fastest shifting auto gearboxes in existance

  • @jlue1993
    @jlue1993 8 років тому +22

    So glad Steve did this review :D

  • @gordon238
    @gordon238 8 років тому +62

    Why can't Top Gear be this good. Steve is class.

    • @vyrnmn
      @vyrnmn 8 років тому

      You want all of the interior shots in Top Gear to be massively under exposed? You're weird.

    • @captcannoli7293
      @captcannoli7293 8 років тому +5

      Steve and chris harris and jethro should have there own show

    • @セインツリトル
      @セインツリトル 7 років тому +1

      リトルセインツ

    • @syntaxerror5610
      @syntaxerror5610 7 років тому

      Bawan Hoshyar ikr.

  • @w-james9277
    @w-james9277 8 років тому +19

    Agression and art working together.

  • @SoCalFreelance
    @SoCalFreelance 8 років тому +24

    Jaguar it's not too late to put the C-X75 into production to represent your flagship supercar!

    • @siddhantdwivedy4921
      @siddhantdwivedy4921 8 років тому +1

      They can't. They don't have the budget to make million dollar production car.

    • @SoCalFreelance
      @SoCalFreelance 8 років тому +1

      What? Of course Jaguar/Land Rover has the capital to build the C-X75. Their net income for 2014 was 2.5 billion GBP with revenue of 19.4 billion GBP

    • @siddhantdwivedy4921
      @siddhantdwivedy4921 8 років тому

      +SoCalFreelance why do you think they have not done that yet...the car has been out fr long time now.. It would have been competing with Holy trinity.. They have other important priorities like building new svo division.

    • @SoCalFreelance
      @SoCalFreelance 8 років тому

      Why is it so out of the question for Jaguar to have a flagship hypercar? The XJ220 was produced to much acclaim. A brand like Jaguar can become diluted if they don't have a flagship vehicle/s which demonstrates their heritage, engineering, and design prowess. I'm sure Ford has other priorities too, but they still produced the GT anyway. Same with Porsche and the 918.

    • @siddhantdwivedy4921
      @siddhantdwivedy4921 8 років тому +1

      +SoCalFreelance yes they should. but like I said they don't make profits like ford and Porsche does. They would rather invest more of the their profit to their RnD and expanding business. Also these hypercars won't give them profit as their regular luxury cars do. But it would be awesome if they could.

  • @shayorrahman8733
    @shayorrahman8733 8 років тому +2

    Wow, the description of the suspension is insightful. Excellent review

  • @bravoelliot
    @bravoelliot 8 років тому +10

    I love the new era of British sports cars and Super Cars. The new Aston Martin db11 is also a masterclass

  • @BasuSatwik
    @BasuSatwik 8 років тому +27

    So it is not a supercar because it is front engined? Then the SLR, 599, F12 are not supercars. That part was plain stupid, rest of the video's good.

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 8 років тому +3

      Maybe its just me, but I consider the SLR, 599 and F12 to be hyper-GTs!

    • @chrissorreda4982
      @chrissorreda4982 8 років тому +1

      +Rogue Qall yeah you got it right.

    • @Redstoneprime316
      @Redstoneprime316 7 років тому

      Satwik Basu LFA? SLS? Pretty much every classic supercar in existence (E.G Ferrari 250 GTO, Ferrari Daytona, Lamborghini 350GT, Mercedes-Benz 300SL, etc)?

  • @korgond
    @korgond 8 років тому +8

    very beatiful design.

  • @fabianscarlife
    @fabianscarlife 8 років тому +4

    Just an awesome car! It looks quite good and sounds so amazing!

  • @501pj
    @501pj 6 років тому +9

    You completely missed the point of the car. It's not a GT3 track car, it's a road car, so why not devote your time to testing it on the road.

  • @eddiejones1728
    @eddiejones1728 8 років тому +4

    Jag needs to step up to the next level this is very much a gimmick. Loads of aluminium but still as heavy as xj if they want the svr badge taken seriously then lose 150kg at least add dsg an they should easily be getting 600hp from that engine and on that note redevelop it with turbos this car could an should be so much more!

  • @kieran_hawkins
    @kieran_hawkins 4 роки тому +2

    My dad has this exact car and I can’t believe it still 😂

  • @501pj
    @501pj 5 років тому +2

    Since maybe one percent of owners will do track days what was the point of this test? And twin clutch gearboxes are notoriously fragile in normal use.

  • @claytonthecountryboy3272
    @claytonthecountryboy3272 5 років тому +5

    Actually it does 60 in 2.9 secs and tops at 202

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 років тому

      Lol no. 0-60 in 3.5 and tops at 200 mph

    • @Deathstaroya
      @Deathstaroya Рік тому

      @@vika0194I’ve done 3.2 with my current svr - zero mods - 5% ethanol

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 Рік тому

      @@Deathstaroya Good. But still not 2.9. I have an R.

  • @metalorizon7162
    @metalorizon7162 8 років тому +2

    This car should be called "Elephant F-type SVR" because of its drifting sound.

  • @gekos7155
    @gekos7155 7 років тому +6

    Wait why must supercars be mid engine? the SLS was front engined and that is a classic supercar.

    • @ifirebolti2789
      @ifirebolti2789 6 років тому

      mika haken well, the SLS was actually mid-engine, the engine was just still infront of the driver.
      That’s why the driver is practically sat on the rear axel

  • @anthonytromp6265
    @anthonytromp6265 4 роки тому +1

    That car is the best GT car on earth.

  • @acab1015
    @acab1015 8 років тому +1

    Hahaha such an awesome intro!😃

  • @austinpaseka8069
    @austinpaseka8069 5 місяців тому

    7 years later and that “slow shifting” ZF 8 speed is in the fastest accelerating car in the world lol. (Dodge demon 170) there’s nothing slow or laggy about that transmission. No it’s not PDK, but it snaps off shifts fast, has great input and does it reliably.

  • @yohan-electwordofguardthem9173
    @yohan-electwordofguardthem9173 6 років тому +2

    It'$ build for me that'$ why it'$ so good✅Thank you Jaguar corperation'$🤑✋

  • @sbomorse
    @sbomorse 8 років тому +2

    That steering wheel didn't have suede on it

  • @PINGPAZ
    @PINGPAZ 8 років тому +30

    very good review , personally i dont Like the spoiler on the car

    • @ScottZ370
      @ScottZ370 8 років тому +1

      You can have the normal one as an option

    • @TekNeez
      @TekNeez 8 років тому +1

      It's an active aero wing. Didn't you see the shot of the wing moving?

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 8 років тому

      you can choose to remove it when ordering now...

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 8 років тому +4

      it is active but it doesn't hide inside the car like the regular wing on the normal F-type version. you can choose this SVR wing or the regular wing for the SVR

    • @PINGPAZ
      @PINGPAZ 8 років тому +6

      would defenitly order the normal spoiler :p

  • @HesteBremse
    @HesteBremse 8 років тому

    I find it weird that Jaguar has not nailed this already - They build a brand new car, new platform, everything and even now with this SVR version Mr. Sutcliffe is not really excited. If it is too high expectations towards at home brand I do not know, but I do not think so. But perhaps Jaguar have figured it out and will hit, as suggested in the video on, the absolute right spot for buyers of this car.
    Is the Jaguar F-Type hot in the USA ?

  • @highgate14
    @highgate14 4 роки тому +1

    Steve, how would you rate this compared with the GT4 718?

  • @nickamarit
    @nickamarit 8 років тому +2

    I want to see an XE SVR... Jaguar, please make one!

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 років тому +1

      They basically did. Project 8

  • @mikev6046
    @mikev6046 7 років тому +4

    This car makes the Aston Martin Vantage S V8 obsolete.

  • @TekNeez
    @TekNeez 8 років тому +1

    The only Jag I want

  • @nathanscott9075
    @nathanscott9075 8 років тому

    Totally right about the gearbox! Ive never liked it for fast driving, isnt sharp enough!

  • @brianmaurin5642
    @brianmaurin5642 8 років тому

    Great review Steve. IMO, while the SVR is faster, the spoiler kind of looks like an aftermarket job on the near flawless design of the R. Same goes with the Aventador SV.

  • @nilsenbj
    @nilsenbj 8 років тому

    It should have a "drift mode" button like the new ford focus to lock up the rear diff, and send 100% to the rear, to make it a dual purpose drift and fun or safe and fast car imo.

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 років тому

      It does... turn traction control off...

  • @FFE-js2zp
    @FFE-js2zp 3 роки тому +1

    Best car ever.

  • @IEATU95
    @IEATU95 8 років тому

    Steve Sutcliffe is so awesome!

  • @madshartmann3684
    @madshartmann3684 8 років тому

    Cool car! How is it priced compared to the GT3? Because if they're similar priced, I think I would go for the GT3.

  • @garydeandeery
    @garydeandeery 8 років тому +1

    Love the back wing even more did test the f type jag have came so far but lots of money and small things running cost

  • @terje2332
    @terje2332 8 років тому

    That elephant sound at the start

  • @thimble288
    @thimble288 8 років тому +1

    So now that we've seen the limit of the F-type, and it doesn't really seem to care about showing the GT3 its heels, the paddles seem even more out of place. Aston has the sense to include a gear lever in a car that is equal parts soul and speed. I think Aston wins this round, although I don't know what model I'd compare to the SVR.

    • @thimble288
      @thimble288 8 років тому

      Paddles do sell sports cars though, and the F-type is nothing without the curb. My interest drifts towards Jag's sedan lineup.

    • @siddhantdwivedy4921
      @siddhantdwivedy4921 8 років тому

      The oversteer, The sound and the looks is what gives this car it's character.. F type won't be fun if they make it to compete GT3RS which is all about track times.

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 8 років тому

      "Aston has the sense to include a gear lever" ...as much as I love Aston, it took them long enough to put a manual in their car!

  • @mickwrinkles2318
    @mickwrinkles2318 8 років тому +7

    How is the car? It's fast.
    How does it sound? Pretty great, listen to it.
    Lighter, stiffer, more power.
    Then some drifting.
    All these car channels are basically doing the same thing for 3 years now. Getting bored with it.

    • @CryptoChangingTheWorld
      @CryptoChangingTheWorld 8 років тому

      What would you do different? Only so much you can do with a car.

    • @ThePandaBeat
      @ThePandaBeat 8 років тому +1

      it's the recipe to modern car "journalism"...
      zzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZ

    • @thimble288
      @thimble288 8 років тому

      You could say that about lots of things and make them sound boring. Go drive your car on a track and you'll feel better.

    • @thevitruvianman9781
      @thevitruvianman9781 8 років тому

      Buh dumm tsss

  • @shannonnicholas8329
    @shannonnicholas8329 8 років тому

    great review :)

  • @EdgarRenje
    @EdgarRenje 8 років тому +2

    Looks like the same blue, which Ford uses for their Focus RS...

    • @voilemontagne
      @voilemontagne 8 років тому +6

      no absolutely not. Both are blue but the RS blue is far brighter and lighter.

  • @Powaup
    @Powaup 8 років тому +2

    so you're saying 991 Carerra S> F type SVR?

  • @albertweedsteinthethuggeni7797
    @albertweedsteinthethuggeni7797 4 роки тому

    My dream car

  • @Gairsy08
    @Gairsy08 8 років тому

    Awesome car, but I think I prefer the noise of the Aston Martin GT8 :)

  • @135iN55
    @135iN55 5 років тому

    The SVR is king of AWD F-Types, but the RWD F-Types have 10% more WHP and are 300 pounds lighter, making them the king of ALL F-Types.

  • @alanjackson526
    @alanjackson526 7 років тому

    Think I'd stick with the normal R for nearly half the price of the svr in second hand prices.

  • @CristiCroicu
    @CristiCroicu 8 років тому

    They made the back stiffer so that it oversteers more thab before, because it has 4 wheel drive and engine in the front.

    • @future62
      @future62 8 років тому +4

      This is a terrible and silly way to try and fake a car's balance. They should have tuned the suspension to the car's natural balance, which is grip transitioning to understeer.

    • @OwenTan2
      @OwenTan2 8 років тому

      +future62 or just simply make it rwd

  • @zpe1200
    @zpe1200 8 років тому

    Steve Sutcliffe for Top Gear.

  • @CP-pf4fi
    @CP-pf4fi 3 роки тому

    This guy absolutely loves the word neurotic

  • @haithamzo6
    @haithamzo6 8 років тому +2

    super

  • @nico74321
    @nico74321 3 роки тому

    I got so much hate driving this thing around my neighborhood, it's really loud

  • @Akhilmangala
    @Akhilmangala 7 років тому

    the background music please

  • @suppien
    @suppien 6 років тому

    Whats the music in the background?

  • @longtailgt
    @longtailgt 8 років тому

    Beautiful video of a beautiful car! The looks and sound alone are worth the price of the SVR! Although I still can't bring myself to like the awd because it just does not suit the F-Type's character.

  • @aswinraj4287
    @aswinraj4287 3 роки тому

    Jaguar 💖

  • @AbeBillion
    @AbeBillion 8 років тому +6

    you have to be on Porsche payroll smh

  • @edwatters5788
    @edwatters5788 7 років тому +4

    jag needs to reduce the weight on these f types if they want to compete with gt3's or amg gt s's on track

    • @petersothern4693
      @petersothern4693 7 років тому +7

      Ed Watters it does 0-60 in 3.5 seconds I think that's quick enough. bet they build a SVR-R

    • @501pj
      @501pj 6 років тому

      They don't. It's a road car.

  • @chadhaire1711
    @chadhaire1711 5 років тому +1

    camera angle sucks--I want to see the car and road --all i see is a head and mouth talking..SUCKS

  • @skuskurt1362
    @skuskurt1362 6 років тому +1

    Left and right air front gaps are fake

  • @vika0194
    @vika0194 5 років тому

    You can barely hear when you speak. It’s almost like you are whispering

  • @BronchoGillespie
    @BronchoGillespie 8 років тому

    New shirt Steve?

  • @ThePandaBeat
    @ThePandaBeat 8 років тому

    Looks pretty. Sounds good. That's it.
    Keep trying Jagyou're.

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 років тому

      So basically it has everything you want. Sound and design...

  • @mikea5205
    @mikea5205 8 років тому +14

    Should have been a manual.

    • @onoff314
      @onoff314 8 років тому +18

      nah, fuck off Steve

    • @petersothern4693
      @petersothern4693 7 років тому +1

      Mike A R u serious??

    • @madgtthree
      @madgtthree 7 років тому

      Nah, manuals have their place but this wouldn't make sense as a manual. The V6 comes with a manual and that's perfect. Dual clutch/auto transmissions are necessary for high bhp torquey cars as it helps with the delivery of the power. Plus this would be a monster to control in pure manual form. My neighbor has the V6 convertible manual and trust mate it's perfect. Jaguar nailed the line up on the F Type models.

  • @AGC828
    @AGC828 7 років тому

    So not quite a 911 in handling and I guess "steering feel"...

  • @MichaelCoenenCoach
    @MichaelCoenenCoach 8 років тому

    Cooles Auto :-)

  • @CageyJ0nnY
    @CageyJ0nnY 8 років тому

    I get the impression Steve likes the word 'neurotic'.

  • @Cupra-290
    @Cupra-290 8 років тому

    This felt a lot like an advertisement.

  • @osborl12
    @osborl12 8 років тому

    Rupert Everett?

  • @Loki1815
    @Loki1815 Рік тому

    Oh, so in Dynamic mode, you wouldn't buy one, fair enough!

  • @saratov99
    @saratov99 8 років тому +5

    I bet that standard Corvette will go faster around the track for twice less money.

    • @kgsva
      @kgsva 8 років тому +17

      Piss off you knob

    • @Fat-bananas
      @Fat-bananas 8 років тому +1

      maybe, maybe not with the Z51, but when the grand sport hits later this year? I'd put my money on THAT vette

    • @ThePandaBeat
      @ThePandaBeat 8 років тому

      I bet the Mustang 350R already does for 1/4th of the money.

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому +1

      “Twice less” you mean half as much. One of the main reasons people buy flashy cars is to show off and to impress women. Where I live, California, nobody under 60 is going to be impressed by a Vette because they are old guy cars. Young people don’t buy them since the average Vette buyer is old enough to collect Social Security.

    • @joolsthesteam
      @joolsthesteam 6 років тому +3

      No it won't.
      Plus Corvettes are badly built.

  • @CarswithB
    @CarswithB 8 років тому

    Nice car but not a fan of that wing!

  • @stefan78246
    @stefan78246 6 років тому +1

    Effspot 😂

  • @AlastorTheNPDemon
    @AlastorTheNPDemon 8 років тому

    Man, fuck that liftoff oversteer! I mean, guess that's almost the point, but it seems more like a serious suspension goof-up to me.

    • @AlastorTheNPDemon
      @AlastorTheNPDemon 8 років тому

      I'll give it one thing though: the looks are to die for!

    • @AlastorTheNPDemon
      @AlastorTheNPDemon 8 років тому

      ***** Doesn't front engine usually mean liftoff *understeer* though with torque-related oversteer? I mean, I was thinking that to be a mostly mid-engine thing, but it is easy to do to a front-engine vehicle with a few subtle suspension changes. Don't take my word for it though; I just learned that from spending hours tuning cars in Forza Motorsport.

  • @TheFunkyair
    @TheFunkyair 8 років тому

    Steve the man
    İt is good car
    Not perfect

  • @vanilakung7563
    @vanilakung7563 8 років тому +1

    I fucking hate that engine noise

    • @MonteiroM
      @MonteiroM 8 років тому +6

      Me too.
      A 2.0 diesel sounds so much better.
      (sarcasm)

    • @_M27_
      @_M27_ 8 років тому +1

      +Monteiro diesels sounds great -_- there is nothing wrong with diesels (and no this is no sarcasme)

  • @kevinl6231
    @kevinl6231 7 років тому

    What's with the quilted seats. They look like a mattress. Never liked them on any car for that matter.

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 років тому

      It looks classy

  • @future62
    @future62 8 років тому

    Can't beat physics. A sexy beast no doubt, but this version seems pointless. 10-15K more gets you a 911 Turbo which is better in every way but looks. Peak F-Type is probably a V6-S convertible. This thing is just confused

    • @sw1000xg
      @sw1000xg 8 років тому

      lol and how long have they been making the same car as least this is a new car if they spent 40 tears making it good it would be for superior

    • @future62
      @future62 8 років тому

      sw1000xg
      But they didn't, so it isn't.

    • @future62
      @future62 8 років тому

      RWD Jag R is a mess too. Bottom line this chassis can't really handle more than 400HP in a good way.

    • @future62
      @future62 8 років тому

      fuckoffgoogle
      The car can't make use of the power and torque it has.... even more power would only make things worse. Like I said this thing can pretty much only handle ~400HP. Multiple reviewers have agreed that the V6S is the sweet spot, and the V8s are too much. But they review the V8s more because mouthbreathers like yourself automatically assume more power is always better.

  • @vachiramondgunakasemtanawa5600
    @vachiramondgunakasemtanawa5600 8 років тому

    I am saving my money to buy a tesla s coupe!

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому

      Unless you are loaded you had better be saving hard cos the first Tesla coupes will be about $300,000 out the door, later edition will start at only $250,000!

  • @TAKASHI2010SAM
    @TAKASHI2010SAM 7 років тому +3

    its no more british car lel its indian

    • @Redstoneprime316
      @Redstoneprime316 7 років тому +1

      Jaguar was founded in Britain, so that technically makes it British. (along with the fact that this car was designed and built in England).

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому +3

      Most of the railway lines in India were designed and built by the British does that make them British ? How about Ben and Jerrys, British owned, does that make it English ice cream? A lot of Californian vineyards are French owned does that make it French wine? See how silly it gets!

  • @salimbatel6571
    @salimbatel6571 8 років тому

    Sutcliffe alone can beat Top shit gear without Charris

  • @dreray4077
    @dreray4077 8 років тому

    F Type R is prettier, I think Jaguar is turning into something they shouldnt be, Who gives a shit how fast a car goes around a circuit, Build what you have always built.

    • @Gunner1302
      @Gunner1302 7 років тому +2

      Dre Ray uhm demand dude. people want fast cars and if you can't deliver then you lose the customer base to your competitors. it's not like you'll buy their old style cars anyway

    • @jacobrambo600
      @jacobrambo600 7 років тому

      Dre Ray This is by far the sexiest car they've ever built so FU

  • @jonathanschultz2472
    @jonathanschultz2472 8 років тому +1

    Reporting for porn

  • @ingineous
    @ingineous 8 років тому

    BECAUSE 911R>FTYPE SVR ....TOO MUCH BS TO DRIVE IT! (manual trans+no driver aids =perfect driver car)

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 8 років тому

      Those two cars aren't comparable, not even in the same market. Chalk & Cheese

    • @ingineous
      @ingineous 8 років тому

      +Rogue Qall please expound

    • @onoff314
      @onoff314 8 років тому

      They are definitely comparable cars

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 8 років тому

      Onoff314 Not at all... the 911R is a car with everything removed from it for driving purity. The F-Type SVR is a car with EVERYTHING put on it to be as tricked up as possible. Completely opposite ends of the spectrum as performance cars go. The 911R is for drivers that say, "I'm gonna be alone for a while, to enjoy a drive". The SVR is for drivers who are always "LOOK AT ME!"

    • @onoff314
      @onoff314 8 років тому

      Rogue Qall The 911R is not a racecar with everything removed from it... That would be the GT2 lineup (not yet released), the GT3 is a track weapon but certainly still driveable on the street as is the 911R, sit in one for a drive and you will find its stiff but still comfortable

  • @kevgits
    @kevgits 8 років тому +1

    So the bottom line is...GOOD BUT NOT GREAT. I think i agree.

  • @miketheman4341
    @miketheman4341 6 років тому

    It’s a Jag! Test the 911GTS which is what you pay for a for this Jag and you get a faster better street and track car along with world class reliability. Everything the Jag does not.

    • @HussainMubeen
      @HussainMubeen 5 років тому +1

      Ill take the Jag over a glorified VW Beetle

    • @bobsgrowler6375
      @bobsgrowler6375 5 років тому +1

      Porsche world class reliability?. You have got to be kidding right?.

  • @alejandrohidalgo5734
    @alejandrohidalgo5734 7 років тому

    Hate the color. Love it in Italian Racing Red

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 років тому

      Svr doesn’t exist in Italian racing red unless you make a special order for a lot of money

  • @mantsisnick
    @mantsisnick 7 років тому +2

    As British as Tata motors !!!

    • @Redstoneprime316
      @Redstoneprime316 7 років тому +5

      Did you forget where Jaguar was founded? That's right, England. Also, this car was made in Birmingham, and I'm pretty sure that's in England. Plus, you don't see people calling Lamborghinis "German" or Ferraris "American", now, do you?

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому +1

      Nik Man Jeep as American as Fiat

  • @mubasshirhasan7783
    @mubasshirhasan7783 6 років тому +1

    Jaguar and range rover are now indian.

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому

      Mubasshir Hasan Every Jag or Rover video has silly people pointing out what we all know and claiming those vehicles that are designed and built in England are Indian. Is a Lamborghini a German car?

    • @mubasshirhasan7783
      @mubasshirhasan7783 6 років тому

      Fred Thomas (owned by indian)* u misunderstood

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому

      A better one would be do you think Budweiser is Belgian beer?

    • @mubasshirhasan7783
      @mubasshirhasan7783 6 років тому

      🦃 turkey belongs to Turkey that would be great.

    • @FredBTs
      @FredBTs 6 років тому

      Mubasshir Hasan No, you wrote “are Indian”.

  • @jeffpolaras9273
    @jeffpolaras9273 6 років тому

    Aint no corvette

  • @4SHO421
    @4SHO421 6 років тому

    Who gives a Flack about drifting? At least above the age of 12?

  • @chrisgriffiths8454
    @chrisgriffiths8454 6 років тому

    The latest Jaguar car designs are lame. Jaguars don't look like jaguars anymore.

    • @Redstoneprime316
      @Redstoneprime316 4 роки тому

      I'm guessing the, the Project 7 and the XE SV Project 8 are the exceptions?

  • @GospodinCovek87
    @GospodinCovek87 8 років тому +9

    Not even close to gt3.

    • @nikb6528
      @nikb6528 8 років тому

      Indeed.

    • @willywillywillywillywilly
      @willywillywillywillywilly 8 років тому

      +Nik Brudar Indood.

    • @ashtonmurch2142
      @ashtonmurch2142 8 років тому +1

      I swear I see you on every vid i watch....it's getting weird

    • @nikb6528
      @nikb6528 8 років тому

      Ashton Murch Who? It means you watch too many videos then.

    • @nikb6528
      @nikb6528 8 років тому

      Willy Lamb Come on, Lamb. Get your shit together.

  • @j.g.bloodworth9837
    @j.g.bloodworth9837 6 років тому

    Beautiful car. Too bad it's an unreliable piece of crap.

  • @henrysiegertsz8204
    @henrysiegertsz8204 8 років тому +3

    Not much for all the "Neurosis", but the driving was class! How can you criticise someone who can handle a car like that?Great review!

  • @karleignr
    @karleignr Рік тому

    as an SVR owner, it says a lot about the car if you are going to compare it to a GT3 that is 50K+ more expensive and in today's market at least 100 more. You can get one of these for 718 (non GT4) money. As a daily, I would argue it sounds way better than Porsche. It has a track edge that you can take to the track occasionally but isnt meant to beat you up like a GT3 or GT4. This is C8 stingray money and I would argue is wayyyy more gorgeous. The SVR is incredibly underrated and I have a new respect for Jag. Great review btw