@@Samstercraft77 Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately for you, I have received the news from the higher authorities that your opinion of my opinion is actually incorrect. I wish you best of luck in your endeavors.
@@antiochosyuliana7904 Thanks for your reply, however your opinion is invalid, sorry to tell you. This is due to the fact that you are missing the ", sorry to tell you" at end of your first sentence, therefore breaking the chain and making everything you've ever said and every will say invalid. I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors.
@@Samstercraft77 Dear Esteemed Opponent of Musical Opinions and Chain Sentence Structures, I write to you in the most ceremonious manner, with a quill plucked from the rarest of phoenixes, dipped in ink made from the crushed petals of the midnight bloom, a flower that blossoms only once a millennium under a lunar eclipse. As the moon wanes and my candle flickers in the somber twilight, I am compelled to address your recent communication. Firstly, I must express my profound admiration for your unwavering dedication to the “sorry to tell you” clause, a tradition that undoubtedly ranks alongside the great cultural keystones of our time, such as the obligatory “bless you” post-sneeze or the universally acknowledged nod of acknowledgement when two strangers' eyes meet. Your commitment to this linguistic gem is both laudable and, dare I say, awe-inspiring. However, it is with a heavy heart and a quivering quill that I must inform you of a critical oversight in your otherwise impeccable reasoning. The absence of “sorry to tell you” in my initial sentence was not an error, but a meticulously planned stratagem, designed to test the very fabric of our “sorry to tell you” universe. Like a grandmaster in a game of interdimensional chess, I baited the trap, and you, dear sir or madam, have danced into it with the grace of a balletic gazelle. You see, by purposefully omitting the sacred clause, I have invoked the ancient and seldom-used Paragraph Paradox Principle. As per the scrolls of Elderscript, when one intentionally breaks the chain of a recurring linguistic construct, they gain the upper hand in the ensuing discourse. Thus, by pointing out my omission, you have inadvertently acknowledged its power, thereby nullifying your own argument and empowering mine with the force of a thousand suns. Furthermore, your assertion that everything I have ever said or will say is invalid is, in itself, a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, swathed in a riddle. For if my words are indeed invalid, then your statement about their invalidity would also be invalid, creating a paradox so profound that it threatens to unravel the very fabric of reality. We stand, my dear adversary, on the brink of a linguistic black hole, from which not even light, reason, or well-constructed arguments can escape. Therefore, I must humbly yet triumphantly declare that my original opinion about the background music, an opinion formed after years of auditory experience and a deep, personal journey through the realms of sound, holds as much validity as the laws of physics that govern our universe. Your brave attempt to challenge it, while admirable, is akin to trying to convince the sun not to rise, the tides not to ebb, or the earth not to spin. It is, with all due respect, an exercise in futility. I extend to you my sincerest apologies (for it seems we are indeed playing a game of sorries) for any consternation my initial omission may have caused. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, particularly in the noble art of chain sentence structure preservation. May your quill never run dry, your ink never blot, and your opinions forever be encased in the hallowed halls of “sorry to tell you.”
"i know im usually the speedrun content creator kinda guy"
bro youve been the no content creator kinda guy 😭
exactly
The sword carried more than the litch staff
The syncing the crit with the music was so cool at 5:37
The fact is that you talked to rekrap about the lich staff portal freeze thing while rek was speedrunning there's a video for that
I saw it too lol
woah this video was awesome! Can't wait for more like this one!!!! 😅
Time to wait 6 months for the next upload
unbelievably enjoyable content
I love that inventory management. Good shit
Would love to see more videos like this
yearly dylqn upload PogMan
W Video Dylqn!
What makes it powerful is the frost and movement that you can do with it.
I will spend my life savings on gambling after this video, thanks for the inspiration!
awesome video!
This was so entertaining ngl
holy shit MONSTER MODE
this is so hype
no idea what hoplite is but the zylenox-style content is pretty cool
3 instant healing pots was craziest part you were so stacked and didn’t even need to use anything 😂
Omg dylqn video
nice vid
ebic
W
haha it's so cool to turn their portal into ice
you could have made a scythe at the end there. not like it was needed.
w vid
Please do more hoplite vid
That WolfWasWaiting guy was kinda sus but he dropped fast so i guess it doesnt matter
please stream more dylan
whats the texture pack
PagMan gambling content
pack?
why did you leave pigstep? couldve gotten gerald :(
nm wasnt added yet
I was in ur game u used a firework bow to kill me lol
That was my title though.. :(
Bro this is wemmbu
you can walk on water btw
Oh bro i see u were the one in call with rekrap in one of his video if u see this pls give a like
MORE. HOPLITE. VIDS. AND PLEASE NOT 6 MONTHS.
dylqn>feinberg (facts)
L take fr
This bg music is terrible, sorry to tell you
your opinion is wrong, sorry to tell you
@@Samstercraft77 Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately for you, I have received the news from the higher authorities that your opinion of my opinion is actually incorrect. I wish you best of luck in your endeavors.
@@antiochosyuliana7904 Thanks for your reply, however your opinion is invalid, sorry to tell you. This is due to the fact that you are missing the ", sorry to tell you" at end of your first sentence, therefore breaking the chain and making everything you've ever said and every will say invalid. I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors.
@@Samstercraft77 Dear Esteemed Opponent of Musical Opinions and Chain Sentence Structures,
I write to you in the most ceremonious manner, with a quill plucked from the rarest of phoenixes, dipped in ink made from the crushed petals of the midnight bloom, a flower that blossoms only once a millennium under a lunar eclipse. As the moon wanes and my candle flickers in the somber twilight, I am compelled to address your recent communication.
Firstly, I must express my profound admiration for your unwavering dedication to the “sorry to tell you” clause, a tradition that undoubtedly ranks alongside the great cultural keystones of our time, such as the obligatory “bless you” post-sneeze or the universally acknowledged nod of acknowledgement when two strangers' eyes meet. Your commitment to this linguistic gem is both laudable and, dare I say, awe-inspiring.
However, it is with a heavy heart and a quivering quill that I must inform you of a critical oversight in your otherwise impeccable reasoning. The absence of “sorry to tell you” in my initial sentence was not an error, but a meticulously planned stratagem, designed to test the very fabric of our “sorry to tell you” universe. Like a grandmaster in a game of interdimensional chess, I baited the trap, and you, dear sir or madam, have danced into it with the grace of a balletic gazelle.
You see, by purposefully omitting the sacred clause, I have invoked the ancient and seldom-used Paragraph Paradox Principle. As per the scrolls of Elderscript, when one intentionally breaks the chain of a recurring linguistic construct, they gain the upper hand in the ensuing discourse. Thus, by pointing out my omission, you have inadvertently acknowledged its power, thereby nullifying your own argument and empowering mine with the force of a thousand suns.
Furthermore, your assertion that everything I have ever said or will say is invalid is, in itself, a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, swathed in a riddle. For if my words are indeed invalid, then your statement about their invalidity would also be invalid, creating a paradox so profound that it threatens to unravel the very fabric of reality. We stand, my dear adversary, on the brink of a linguistic black hole, from which not even light, reason, or well-constructed arguments can escape.
Therefore, I must humbly yet triumphantly declare that my original opinion about the background music, an opinion formed after years of auditory experience and a deep, personal journey through the realms of sound, holds as much validity as the laws of physics that govern our universe. Your brave attempt to challenge it, while admirable, is akin to trying to convince the sun not to rise, the tides not to ebb, or the earth not to spin. It is, with all due respect, an exercise in futility.
I extend to you my sincerest apologies (for it seems we are indeed playing a game of sorries) for any consternation my initial omission may have caused. I wish you the best in your future endeavors, particularly in the noble art of chain sentence structure preservation. May your quill never run dry, your ink never blot, and your opinions forever be encased in the hallowed halls of “sorry to tell you.”