Mikhail Gorbachev on the last days of the Soviet Union
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 вер 2022
- In December 1991 Ted Koppel interviewed the Soviet President at the Kremlin as the USSR ceased to exist. The man who oversaw the dissolution of a Cold War superpower (who died this week at age 91) offered a Russian fable to help explain his country's fate.
#mikhailgorbachev #ussr #tedkoppel
"CBS Sunday Morning" features stories on the arts, music, nature, entertainment, sports, history, science and Americana, and highlights unique human accomplishments and achievements. Check local listings for CBS Sunday Morning broadcast times.
Subscribe to the "CBS Sunday Morning" UA-cam channel: bit.ly/20gXwJT
Get more of "CBS Sunday Morning": cbsn.ws/1PlMmAz
Follow "CBS Sunday Morning" on Instagram: bit.ly/23XunIh
Like "CBS Sunday Morning" on Facebook: bit.ly/3sRgLPG
Follow "CBS Sunday Morning" on Twitter: bit.ly/1RquoQb
Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
"People born, people suffer, and people die" Such a bleak yet beautiful and accurate way of seeing life.
Yeah, a lot could be simples avoided if people get the a good ideia of life
Straight from the atheist ethos.
Mikhail Gorbachev, The most underrated, underappreciated and under respected man to have ever lived.
Agree
True
Sad that for the last 30 years his country hated him
@@CelabroSpace we hate him because he caused millions to die in wars at the borders of former USSR and millions to not be born
He will burn in hell like no other human had before
He served the West and that's why only they praise him
He knew that the USSR could not be saved so attempted to do a controlled collapse. Unfortunately many Russians refuse to recognize that it couldn't be saved. He was a good man living in a difficult situation. May he be rewarded in Heaven as he was never rewarded in life.
He admits that he had tried his hardest, he said that if it weren't for the coup plotters trying to take over the soviet union, the new union treaty would have worked, and the new union would probably still be here, and we wouldn't be in the war we are in right now.
Он предал СССР
@@mp443 it was boris yelstin it was always boris Yeltsin not Gorbachev and communism will always lead to the downfall
1:30 This is the CLOSEST thing I have heard to Gorbachev speaking English. He said a simple "Hello"
No he said "aloo" its like a hello but it's used but its used a lot by non americans on the phone its like the "phone hello (ello)" It's only used on phones
It is said he could speak and understand English, but always spoke in his mother tongue during summit meetings. When Reagan is speaking and he's standing off to the side, you can see him comprehending what Reagan is saying.
It always amazes me how open Gorbachev was at a time of so much uncertainty.
Rest in peace Mikhail Gorbachev. You did a lot for your country. Thank you.
Tell that to people in post Soviet republics who survived 90s
Yeah,like ruin it
@@Remix2366 Remix 236 nailed information is very convincing and reliable
@@Redline0332 that was not hes country
@@Remix2366many Russians,Belarussians,Ukranians,Estonians,Latvians,Lithuanians,Georgians,Azerbaijans Kazakhstanians, Kyrgyzstanins and Turkmenistans,Polish,Germans,Hungarians,Mongolians, Czechs,Slovaks,Bulgarians, Romanians, Moldovan, Serbs,Bosnians,Croats,Slovenians and many more all agree fall of ussr was a good change the government just wasn't there anymore wasn't serving the people anymore and change needed to happen
Taking this opportunity, I compare the process of radical opening led by M. Gorbachev with the timid and moderate opening led by N. Khrushchev. That is why, while Khrushchev's opening is historically defined as a de-Stalinization, Gorbachev's would have implied - for me - a kind of "de-Leninization" of the Soviet state, to the point where the U.S.S.R (created by Lenin) ceased to exist.
Unfortunately, the rapprochement between Moscow and Washington that began in the time of Reagan and Gorbachev suffered a gradual setback after the Clinton administration.
Ok but like politics is supposed to be expected to have momentum and succession. de-Stalinization and de-Leninization are too tautological to be discussed, really.
In other words: If I make another version of Craigslist 1000 times where only one thing is offered in the market and it can only be bought with each new market's own cryptocurrency....will it be 2011 again, and then will we be able to go further back in time to when I felt safe? Can I say this is post-Gorbachev?
ua-cam.com/video/T91NIKVhn_4/v-deo.html
To all Americans: You have to know how grateful we here in Central-Eastern Europe are for Gorbachov. He wasn't of course our saver but he let us have freedom which was exeptional in that region of Europe in the 20th century. I am a huge anti-communist, my family suffered incredibly during the Soviet times. (Concentration camp, given away their everything, discrimination in their whole life) But my parents Always tell how the whole country (Hungary)became shocked and a bit hopeful, cause they sensed how different Gorbachev was from Stalin, Hrushkov Brezhnev and the other communist leaders. The Soviet Union would have collapsed of course but it would never happen without blood and with peace if another leader was in power. May you rest in peace, Mr.Gorbachev🤍
Ваш М. Горбачев - ИУДА!!... 😫😡 .. Горбачев это синоним предательство!!...... 😫😡
May his soul rest in peace
Он будет гнить в аду.
@@user-dn2ye7xt6g как и каждый советский коммунист-атеист)
When I worked in Russia in 1993-1994 I flew with Mikhail! Wh spoke , had a drink, he posed with me for a photograph and autographed some items for my children! He loved his people very much and after talking to the westerners he invited himself to join his people and spent the rest of the time with the Russian people!
Cool. Would you tell me what was his favorite drink?
@@actic555 We both had Johnnie Walker Red Label on the rocks! I can not say it was his favorite drink, but that’s what he asked for and I followed suit!
@@jeffcamp481
Cool. Do you still have the photograph?
@@actic555 Yes, It is framed and in my office!
@@jeffcamp481
Awesome! God bless.
Gorbachev isn't dead .He's quietly quiting.
He was a incredibly fkwit and now the Russians and Ukrainians have to pay with their lives on his terrible mistakes !
❤️Gorbschev ,Gorbachev live on youtube forever
Every financial goal requires patience, dedication and consistent spirit knowing that investment is currently the most lucrative business in the world. both NFT, real estate, Stocks and Crypto is positively changing people's lives. I stopped panicking about the market the very moment I started working with Josef Dennis last year, his confidence and skills is on a maximum level…..
I'll agree with you because I've used he's strategy in the past and was able to raise a total profit of 10.5 BTC in 6 weeks.
My first investment with Josef Dennis gave me a profit of over $70K and ever since then he has never failed to deliver and I can even say he is one of the sincere brokers I have known.
Crypto currency and NFTS will outsmart the banking system in the nearest future serving as a global fiat. Already making over 85% profit from my current investment with the help of Josef Dennis's signal
Trading with Josef Dennis have change my life from financially misfortune, I like to introduce you all to him and his strategic method of trading works perfectly well.
I actually read articles of investors who mentioned Josef Dennis and making a lot of money yesterday from crypto investments even during the dip. Thanks for sharing his details
Whether or not you liked him, you have to admit he was a legend. He changed the world (ultimately for the better).
He lead to the deaths of millions upon millions of Russians. He is not a legend
If political instability, war, mass unemployment, increase in poverty and crime is "for the better" then yeah, I guess
That was all Yeltsin
@@hansgoober35 He was a part of the reason for all those things, if the USSR remained stable none of it would have happened. All of that is directly attributable to the break up of the USSR.
Is good hear Mr. Ted again I was a big fan of his night show on abc news although I forgot the name of the show . One of the best news man ever Mr. COBOL
ABC Nightline
@@blomegoog thank you I used to watch it in the eighty every night . The best on tv
He was a great man. He hated Putin to the last. R.I.P.
Putin should love this man, if it wasn't for him Putin would have never had the opportunity he has had since the end of the USSR. He would have never reached the heights he has in that system.
@@thekingofkingsrp TRUE!
And now, it's all over.... Margaret "Iron Lady" Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and Mikhail Gorbachev.
And queen Elizabeth joins the group as well
非常非常感谢您们的提醒！！！
Thank god Gorby came along at the right time for that transition to occur. If their had been hard lines in charge who knows how all of that would've went down. Yeltsin was a part of that too but proved to be detrimental in my opinion to what happened in Russian afterwards and was instrumental in getting Putin to be president. It's been down hill ever since. RIP Mr. Gorbachev.
Unfortunately alcohol got the better of Yeltsin
As a Russian person, I want to notice the accuracy and insight of your comment
A great man and a true man of peace.
Вы же американцы только так и умеете дела из под тяшка. Почему все вышний не накажет?
Это мы их должны наказать. Пока они ещё че не будь не сделали нам. Нашему президенту нужно по говорить с Китаем. И сделать все по тихому. Я сколько раз должен писать рядом с Америко океаны моря есть нужно их толкнуть чтоб было Цунами.
Rest in peace from Norway
The United States had a tremendous opportunity when the Soviet Union expired to extend a helping hand to the Russian people, a new Marshall Plan to modernize, assist and offer them an alternative economy and prosperity. Instead it was squandered as the sole remaining Superpower shrugged and gloated. The ensuing resentment and loss of prestige enabled Putin and the current state of affairs.
I agree.
Germany is probably the most powerful country to ever fall gracefully.
Most countries that were once great powers have a strong sense of Nationalism/exceptionalism, perhaps excluding Greece
@@okeneGreece has not been great like that for a millenium really.
@@johnnotrealname8168 I take back what I said about greece. According to PEW research center, Greece was the most nationalistic country in Europe in 2018.
@@okene WoW!
God bless him 🙏 he was a good man from the UK 🇬🇧
An ancient Arabic proverb: “on the corpses of lions the dogs celebrate believing they have won.” But dogs are dogs and lions are lions. “
Pretty cool thank you for sharing
A good one
Gorbachev never intended to bring down the Soviet Union, but rather, he wanted to simply modernize it, for a 21st century. He wanted to create the United Soviet Sovereign Republics, a new era of the USSR. But unfortunately for him, Boris Yeltsin, his political opponent, sought to bring down the hammer and sickle, and create a capitalist Russia. Yeltsin sought to this by getting his band of rebels together, and started the August Coup, a means to undermine the power of the Kremlin, and Gorbachev. Gorbachev, in defense, sent tanks to stop the madmen, but refused to fire on the fellow Soviet citizens. This highly publicized event, was shown through the Soviet Union, as a sort of "final nail in the coffin". Countries started claiming their independence, and for a short brief 4 days The last remaining bit of the Soviet Union was the Kazak-SSR (modern day Kazakhstan). By Christmas, Gorbachev was forced to resign, and the Soviet Union fell, as a new, Tsarist style Russian Federation tri-color flew high in the Kremlin. Afterward, the newly created countries where facing internal turmoil, from people wanting the Soviet Union back, and the now capitalist governments silencing, not to mention, fighting over territory. this lead to the bloody 90s in the Eastern Bloc.
Sadly, with the current Russian president Vladimir Putin, it seems that he wants to create a new Tsarist Russian empire, undermining the very existence of the Soviet Union as a whole, and its purpose. I seriously hope things change for the better....
Yes, the Belovezha Accords was just a huge mistake In general overall, and I say this as a American. It has caused great political instability, economic recesssion, and oligarchic authoritarianism in the post-soviet region. The 1991 Soviet Union referendum showed that the majority of people of the USSR wanted the Union itself to be kept in place just more freedom. But unfortunately, Yeltsin, Yeltsin's colleagues, and the communist hardliners, got in a way of that.
good analysis
True, but Gorbachev should still be credited for the USSR's demise. He was the only Soviet leader that wanted change.
Ted is so young! I know it was 30yrs ago but still shocking.
Rip Gorbachev you will be missed. I wanted to meet him in person and talk about the Cold War and etc
RIP Mikhail Gorbachev That was abrupt.. Still could have Mikhail Gorbachev Peace
this was nice. well done piece.
Rest In Peace Gorby at least you tried and the rest of the world thank you💔
He is such an important person... Perhaps that is why none of the world leaders came to say goodbye to him? From France there was "someone from the consulate", from Germany only a representative of the lowest echelon from the consulate. And... Thats all. And Orban from Bulgaria.
First, no leaders are going to travel to Russia while it is at war with Ukraine. Second, Orban is Hungarian.
Just goes to show he was a loser..who sold out his country, instead of reforming it.
I think it had way more to do with the deteriorating relationship with Russia, if this occurred in say 2019 I think way more world leaders would have showed up instead of just Orban (from Hungary)
He is a traitor to his country. For this he received the Nobel Prize. But traitors are despised by both their own and others.
RIP president Gorbachev
The only soviet leader that was actually born in the soviet union
He will never be forgotten. He will go down in History as a protagonist. BRAVO🙌👏
Rip Gorby ,..a good man ,... from America ,..
?
He was a good man
My like is to Ted’s work.
4:59 To the Sea Turtle Hatchlings in Sea Island Georgia when Sunday Morning continues
The man who saved the world
He danced on stage and it made him human to me.
Damn, just had to bring Poppy into it. How soon people forget
A Great Russian has passed. I hope a renewed Russian Orthodox Church will give Mr. Gorbachev a fitting high mass as a farewell to this wise man! Blessing to Mother Russia!
No.
Stop putin
But rip gorbachev!
Gorbachev did not bring down the wall. The people, in Iron Curtain countries, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, and more, did that in 1989.
Gorbi was done in 1991.
EXACTLY
Yes, Gorbachev and his actions, negotiations with the West made it possible for the subjugated people of Eastern Europe and Central Asia to rise up and take control of their futures.
Because Gorbachev aloud!A regular communist leader arrested everybody(or killed)and send the people to GULAG
非常非常感谢您们的支持和指点和警告‼️
Hero comrade Mikhail
He wasn't a Marxist, buddy.
R.I.P.
He also oversaw the the disaster of Chernobyl. Which they covered up until other countries had issues. Instead of warning right away. He oversaw the invasion of Afghanistan. He was no saint.
He also sent tanks into Estonia and Georgia when they wanted to secede.
Great video.
Yeltsin's briefcase held bottles of vodka, that boozehound
He was wise enough too know that for russia too live the soviet union had too die, the only other option would've been an unthinkable civil war that would've decimated russia.
RIP
As Deng Xiaoping analyzed it, what Russia needed was less glasnost and more perestroika.
RIP Mikhail Gorbachev
Ted Koppel - Mad magazines Alfred E. Newman "What, me worry?"
In looks and intellect.
No, Lew. He was great reporter back when USTV cared about international news.
He broke his country apart.
Villain of the soviet union
Can someone explain what he meant with the fable at the end?
I think it means. If you wait for everyone to come to a consensus and bring all their opinions and facts the day will never come when you can make a decision based on all that is brought before you. At some point you have to make a decision, if you wait for everyone it will take 25 years like this fable and you will either be at your death bed or gone and irrelevant and made no impact on your people. If we waited around for people like Putin to come to a consensus on what to do with the Soviet Union, men like him would still be desperately holding onto it. Now just 30 years later it looks just like that; Putin trying to relive the glory years of the long gone and dead Soviet Union. It's going to end the same way as the Soviet Union did for Russia, much poorer in the end and broke.
A man of peace unlike the warmongers in the western world...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
04-09-2022
Gorbachev was heavily disliked in the Soviet Union because he was ending the very thing that gave people hope. He was loved by the west because he was doing exactly what the west wanted.
wouldn't be nice to have him back in power now ................
In a bizarre way he did Russia a favor the place was too big and too diverse to function like a well lubed machine.
All inside were subjugated
🙏❤ "It's no surprise that most bands break up. How could you not, really? We've been pretty lucky with it. I have had great guys, and we've kind of prioritized the life and spirit of the band above some of our own personal grudges and our own things that we got against this guy, and he's got against you. All those things were there, but we've managed to transcend them in a lovely way at this point in time." -Bruce Springsteen
🙏❤ "Such a genuine, down to earth human being and such a talented genius.. One of the things that always made me like this guy is how genuine and humble he is....he never talks about how great he is.. just how fortunate he is!" -Bruce Springsteen's fans
🙏❤ "Success is not final; failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." -Winston Churchill
💖🙏 "Everybody you fight is not your enemy. And everybody who helps you is not your friend." Mike Tyson
❤🙏 universal regrets that unite us:
(1) "losing 10 years of talking to son/daughter over some issue.. "
(2) "working too much or missing out on that time with loved ones and on oneself.. "
(3) "lack of courage to pursue passions and desires, (because one didn't want to let her parents down).." -Dr. Simran Malhotra
❤🙏 universal sources of joy that unite us:
(1) "a mission or a purpose for living... "
(2) "a tribe or club; friends or a soulmate.. "
(3) "good health.. " -somebody
🙏❤ "I spent my late teens and early 20’s in a -- church. The pastor's wife and her crew of followers tried to break me. I’ve seen every deception and abuse play out. Though today I’m beyond grateful and blessed for the experience. Going to that church taught me about people and how they move. It prepared me for life. It didn’t shake my faith in God. Just church folks." 🧐♥ -Vee London
🙏❤ "Having a purpose of taking care of my family and bringing joy to my clients makes me feel beautiful from the inside out.. Yes, I am getting grey hairs and wrinkles, but I feel more beautiful now because I know I have a great purpose." -Joanna Gaines (Fixer Upper)
🙏❤ “For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone.” - Audrey Hepburn
🙏❤ "Friendship is the hardest thing in the world to explain. It’s not something you learn in school. But if you haven’t learned the meaning of friendship, you really haven’t learned anything." - Muhammad Ali
Щедрые у Мишки были подарки. Страну подарил на Рождество. Герой США.
RIP.
Sad to see what Putin has done after all of Gorbachev’s efforts and advancement!
If evil is not eliminated it tends to resurface.
The advancement was a real disaster.
Rose tinted goggles. Gorbachev's efforts were towards saving a nightmare regime. Thankfully, as well due to unprecedented internal and outside pressures, he failed. That's why he is loved in the West, because he failed.
Also of course because the media, academia, and decadent elites loves fawning over him.
He fought not to save but to CHANGE a nightmare regime. The west loved him because he TRIED.
Тебе грустно, что варвары перестали грабить Россию и она вновь стала великой.... ну ну.
Gorbachev shunned becoming rich. Lenin, Ghana’s Nkrumah, and even Stalin similarly never cared for the crazed acquisitive habits and drive in many humans.
Khrushchev had denounced political and some other excesses of Stalinism, but he and Brezhnev left the Stalin economic command model practically intact. Massive hydrocarbon sales abroad to earn foreign exchange allowed for a sufficiently comfortable existence of the Soviet economy until oil global prices dropped drastically to as low as eight dollars a barrel, under Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
Lenin quickly realized that a pure break with capitalistic practices in the economy would not sustain the Soviet experiment (and no earlier socioeconomic formations have ever suddenly broken clean of the formations pre-existing them!), and he formulated his New Economic Policy (NEP), as a temporary compromise in the socioeconomic sphere, with the communist party resolutely imposing its guiding role. NEP delivered an unprecedented growth in the economic sphere, and in land apportionments.
Lenin also introduced democratic centralism, to allow for free discussion and debate of crucial issues before decision-taking at each vertical compartmentalized layer of party structure, before decisions or recommendations are in like manner collectively taken, to be forwarded to higher compartments.
Five years after Lenin died, his successor, Stalin, abruptly abandoned NEP, despite its continuing economic success. He also felt democratic centralism to be a threat to his (Stalin’s) aspirations to monopolize power. The territory-annexing, imperialistic czar, Ivan the Terrible, was a much more appealing role model for Joseph Stalin than the staunch anti-imperialist Vladimir Lenin. Lenin himself was too slow and too late in realizing that Stalin’s style of leadership would ultimately make him (Stalin) the gravedigger of Soviet communism, and so ought to not inherit him (Lenin) as leader. (North Korea as a vivid Stalinist museum today attracts no truly patriotic foreigners looking for a model to replace the rapacious Wall Street norm in their homeland).
All these issues must have been exercising Gorbachev’s mind long before he assumed the reigns of power in the USSR. His economic reforms should have been started by Khrushchev. And having failed (probably admirably) to use massive violence to preserve the Soviet Union and his own position as supreme leader, it’s now a total anachronism for the current generation of Russians and their political leadership to want to forcibly reconstitute the USSR, more so merely as a geopolitical counterweight to the American imperialists, without any substantial ideological difference.
Gorbachev stands for a socialism which doesn’t treat humans as merely cattle to be fed, and with no human rights.
What most commentators refer to as Soviet communism should rightly be labeled Stalinism, and it’s categorically rejected by Lenin himself, the founder of the Marxist practice to impose justice in all human affairs on the whole planet.
This NEP approach by Lenin, the so-called market Leninism, has been demonstrated by the Chinese to be very much alive and relevant as an alternative to the Westminster-Wall Street greed of exploitation, mass subjugation and impoverishment of the downtrodden in all countries. Gorbachev is a true Leninist, and the cause of Leninist universal justice and prosperity lives on. Science, technology and entrepreneurship shall make the hitherto abstract aspirations of mankind to realize heaven on Earth to gradually become a reality. Let’s not forget that even US President Ronald Reagan once noted publicly that the USA would arrive at socialism before the USSR. His instinct of history and his secret service confidential reports must have developed some Marxian notions in even this staunch capitalist roader.
Hail Gorbachevian humanistic socialism!
Dude seriously? A dissertation on Soviet economic times from before Gorbachev arrived on the scene, in UA-cam comments? A quick synopsis would be much easier to read.. yours is a blog post.
All condition things are impermanent for all beings in the universe.
非常非常感谢您们的警告‼️
My grandma and every sensible person I know hates Mikhail to this day. The rich got richer whilst the poor got poorer.
Im sure that was the hypercapitalist reforms of Boris Yeltsin, not Mikhail Gorbachev who only reformed the unions institutions. 🙂
WHO WILL HELP STABILIZE EASTERN EUROPE AND FIND A WAY TO LIFT THE IRON WALL TODAY?!
I wish we still had leader's like Ronald Reagan and M.r Gorbachev today...
Reagan was a joke. He pretended to be a leader. An actor, remember? They gave him his lines and he played his part and he looked good on screen. He was not the one really running the show there.
Together they stole Natalie Wood from her beloved husband Mr. ROBERT WAGNER and family to never see them again, and the US Navy took her on straight path out black sea to russia and one prince son with gorbachev. If you all knew the evil these men have done and still want to do, the evil fbi and los angeles police still try to go after Innocent Robert Wagners wealth and freedom to accuse him and steal him from his family too for their gov crimes they did to him and Mrs. Wood Wagner. Fbi evil california police over 50yrs corrupt working with evil usa president reagan and vp bush to steal women into human traffick like our evil presidents today are still doing.
@@philomelodia was his part bad?
@@jennymay330 pretty irrelevant question. The astounding thing is if the President of the United States, the elected leader that people wanted an office was not the one running the show. He was a puppet who strings were being pulled by people like James Baker, Strom Thurmond and Alexander Haig. We have a similar situation in the White House today. The difference is we don’t have an actor in office so, all the cracks show. We have an old man long past the age any human being should be tasked with such a massive job as president of the worlds premier superpower with hundreds of political operatives pulling his strings every witch way trying to run the country with him as figurehead. Before him, we had a reality TV star who, while mentally sharper, had no business in power and didn’t know what he was doing and was there to sign bills that the republican Congress passed so that he could further their agenda. The vast difference is that Reagan let himself be controlled. Trump did not. Neither will Biden. But, Reagan set the precedent and they have been trying to get somebody just like him in the White House ever since.
@@philomelodia huh?
Bro why his casket open 😭
Open so people could see him.
It's a tradition.
Maybe the same reason so many Russians have dash cams in their cars. If it wasn't recorded for all to see, there is no proof it actually happened.
Really he was a great person who brought the freedom to all the people of the former USSR. Now, seeing what Putin is doing, you understand that Gorbachev is not a traitor, but a great man.
lol people didn’t want end the Soviet Union he was a traitor in people eyes
Gorbachev made fatal mistakes, especially in reforming politics and the press through glasnost, if perestroika was still ok because economic reform was similar to China in the Deng Xiaoping era.
1991 Christmas must've been the best Christmas for Americans ever in history 😂
@Rostondriatime to light up-
There should be good relations between East and West
Wait did he declassify those docs before taking them home? (Gorby signs) Too late KGB boys, can’t arrest me, FSB is in charge now
Never forget leslie nielson taught us you could use a rag to wipe off his birthmark
Gorbachev although having good intentions, his reign was still a partial disaster, he over saw the dissolution of the USSR which would lead to ethnic genocide in regions like Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Uzbekistan, and Moldova, he oversaw the rise of the Russian oligarch's and capitalist class that currently dominate Russia, completely obliterated the Soviet/Russian housing and medical system, and oversaw the disintegration of the USSR structure. Despite his intentions, his reign was fairly disastrous. Much of the blame for these actions are due to the August Coup and not Gorbachev himself but it is not possible to overlook his actions in the matter. Gorbachev still none the less did good such as de-militarization and scientific endevours, but his actions largely caused the opposite intended effect.
Lol!! You have absolutely no idea what you're prattling on about. MG didn't 'oversee' the oligarchs, that was entirely Putler and his puppet Boris. MG was long gone.
Stick to playing your video games. Spewing such obvious and absurd rubbish embarrasses the entire internet just for having you on it.
@@barbarakauppi9915 His reign did in fact oversee it, the first person to own one million rubles as an example came about during Gorbachev reign, wealth accumulation in the USSR began with Gorbachev. The organized Russian Mafia likewise began gaining power in the late 1980s, during Gorbachev's reign. Moreover your putrid and pedantic response really exemplifies the fact that you have no argument.
@@barbarakauppi9915 just stating some facts to counter his claim would of been fine, no need for toxicity.
best russian ever, wish all russian be like him
Surprised Putin didn't just spit in his casket 🙄
请您们放心！！！
A man from the Providence, as Pope John Paul II called him
Sorry, but I don't get the fable in the first place, and second I don't understand how it applies to Ted's question. I'm not an expert on Russia, but I think we in the West liked Gorbachev because he helped end the Cold War peaceably. Ever hear the phrase "Make America Great Again"? That is what Putin is doing today. "Make Russia Great Again." As bad as the system was under the Communist leaders, the end of the Soviet Union was the ostensible end of Russian greatness. The Russian people, like many in America, think "the good old days" were better than they really were and they long for their rose-colored, fabled past to return.
The system was not bad at all under Communism. Stalin, Lenin and all of the other leaders (except Gorbachev, because he was a traitor), all cared deeply for the survival and freedom and prosperity of the proletariat. THAT was what life was like in the USSR. Pure freedom.
@@TerminalLumbago3657 OK, if you say so. BTW, I have a bridge I'm selling in Manhattan -- really cheap! PM me and I'll make you a great deal. Or you can ask Santa Claus to give it to you at Christmas.
@@emmgeevideo Yet another person brainwashed by the lie that the Soviet Union was bad. :(
@@TerminalLumbago3657 yikes
The fable itself was not that interesting. What fascinating was how emotional Gorbachev was while telling it in a very poignant way.
In principle, a multinational state is not stable, which is why the British, French, Portuguese empires and the Soviet Union collapsed. To resolve the contradiction between the right to self-determination and the inviolability of borders, these principles must be divided territorially: If the territory is the ethnic center of a people, then the right to self-determination applies, if not, then the inviolability of borders. There are ethnic centers of Abkhazians in Abkhazia and Сhechnians in Chechnya, so they have the right to self-determination. The ethnic center of the Ossetians is in North Ossetia, not in the Tskhinvali region of Georgia, so let them seek independence in the real, North Ossetia, and not in South Ossetia (Tskhinvali region) , which is not Ossetia at all. They are recent immigrants there. In Karabakh, there is not a center, but a periphery of Armenians, as in the Krasnodar Territory, where there are many of them.
Have you heard about India😏
A blinded culture that could not recognize a good and great man.
Rose tinted goggles. Gorbachev's efforts were towards saving a nightmare regime. Thankfully, as well due to unprecedented internal and outside pressures, he failed. That's why he is loved in the West, because he failed.
Also of course because the media, academia, and decadent elites love fawning over him so they could ignore the efforts of others they don't like.
Not just blinded but completely flummoxed. Don’t forget that Russia was at the core of empire that subjugated every nation around it and is trying to start that again. Their disinformation program against the entire world is insidious. Just before Bolshevik Revolution, the Russian peasants were still serfs, bound to the land they lived on. So they went from that to WW1, then to Leninist Communism, then to Stalinism and from 1953 onward, one after another of Communist dictators, until Gorbachev. The change for them was so unexpected. So they appear to be more comfortable with dictators ruling over them and keeping neighbor counties as prisoners.
Russian people didn’t like him 74.9 procent was against ending Soviet Union and later he himself admitted that it was to rushed and a lot of Russian ending up suffering
He finished the USSR
It didn't have much life left in it. He just made sure it dissolved in a more orderly manner, even so they did have a hardline coup attempt near the end of those in denial about the Soviet Union. The eastern block had all but broken away, one country declaring Independence from the Soviet Union after another. There wasn't much to hold onto anymore and it was costing too much, they were going bankrupt.
@@marcusdamberger simply because of his policy of perestroika and glasnost
El siempre tuvo la razon...la URRS no debia desintregarse...
Pero el capitalismo hizo su trabajo y AHORA QUE RUSIA ES CAPITALISTA...Y SE ESTA DESARROLLANDO DENUEVO...AHORA ES MAS MALA..
Big nations should think wisely and should show maturity for smaller nations to follow. They should not waste money and energy in arms race. There is no use in our missiles and nuclear bombs. Even an accidental triggering can cause havoc and probably wipe out all life on earth. Even small nuclear radiation leakage can make the whole area uninhabitable forever.
Our atmic explosions are nothing compared to nature's black whole and white whole. Even to reach a nearest star we need a spaceship traveling at the speed of light( which we still don't have) and still would take 30 years to reach the star! So we are too small in this universe and there is no point in our arrogance in our technological innovations and military might. Even the best rationalist or a yogi or a scientist( leave aside the most powerful politicians ) doesn't know where he was before birth and where he will be after death.
We were given birth by our parents, we suckled our mother's milk, fed by them, took baby steps with their help, leant to speak from syllables , got continuous correction in our speech by them and so there is no point in our so called independent thinking and leading our nations to war as if we were on own right from birth whereas in reality nothing is ours not even our intellect and world leaders should know this first.
So we are controlled by a power whether you call it God or not it doesn't matter.
We should resolve issues like territorial disputes through dialogues. Religious differences should be accepted except for Islam which preaches violence on others. So Muslims should educate themselves on their religion by reading their religious books in original or translations and become aware how dangerous is Islam to mankind? They may watch the videos of David wood and Apostle prophet which would save them a lot of reading. They should not simply go by convenient lies fed to them by their religious leaders or clerics. Muslims should finally come out of Islam for their own upliftment and for the sake of world peace.
All modern technology cannot bring back to life the killed citizens. Also the weapons don't cause direct death but torture us for hours before death is given by mercy of God. After effects if we survive wars are also miserable with all disabilities. We still don't have cure for many diseases. Even now there is no solution for calamities like flood and draught. So what is the use of our flaunting dangerous weapons and threating each other ? Technology and Power are not the beginning and end of any nation's life. Good things in life like pity, sympathy, kindness, love etc are not weak to be looked down upon or frowned upon as being feminine but indicates an individual's and a nation's strength.
Even the Covid or monkey pox has not brought us to our senses that just a virus is enough to collapse the whole world and bring us to our knees. What if many such dangerous viruses attack us ? We will still continue with our wars instead of joining together and declaring war on viruses ? We all know any day this earth can be completely destroyed if an asteroid strikes it. So our life is just flicker at the mercy of God or unknown if you don't like the word God.
So our energies should be directed to improving the life of mankind. Cooperation with each other is better than bullying and one upman ship and killing each other and that is the final message. If we are looking for a readymade solution to the problems of the world today probably Gandhism meets most of the requirements. Those who mock at Gandhism as anti-technology should know that it is our technology that has polluted the God's world and has caused global warming which is irreversible. Anyway Gandhism is not against technology. Our craze for modern life style and luxury goods has only spoiled our health and caused irreversible damage to the environment. Instead of making life simpler life is made more and more complex. Probably Gandhism solves most of our economic and social problems
Arm race is undesirable, but it would be too naive to trust other groups of people without having enough forces to check and balance them.
The rivalry between US and China nowadays would be a great example. Is it just a matter of trust and distrust, violence or non-violence, arm race and non arm race? Perhap not. Can you imagine that all 1.4 billion Chinese people to enjoy same living standard as people in the developed countries. If there's enough resources, that would be great and peaceful. However, the world has entered the phase of "limited stock market". That means, for every cent Chinese people gain in the production of high-profit and high tech products, people in the traditional developed countries would lose it. Therefore, the competition is inevitable. US people have enough incentive to defend their high income and high living standard, whereas Chinese people are working hard to enjoy greater quality of life. That's where conflict arise.
Gandhi is a great leader, but we cannot fix our hope on the external force and the conscience of other people. His success is uncopyable. His movement coincided with the surgence of independence of former colonies after WWII and the start of Cold War.
@@yuanhantian9232 There are many concerns in your comments and it may not be possible to answer in one go and my answer may not be direct . Anyway here is my reply:
Though I am not optimist there is no harm in giving a try to solve the world's problems. For eg. Instead of directly going for reduction of nuclear weapons (considering only the
Point that in nuclear war there will not be any winners) the root cause has to be addressed. Probably that is reason the talks on arms reduction between USA and Russia did not move forward. I don't have much historical knowledge of usa Russia conflict.
However my own country India's perspective on this issue: Why are we keeping nuclear weapons? It is to counter threat from China and to threaten Pakistan. If both the countries become democratic and secular there may not be any reason for nuclear weapons in future. When they would also democratic and secular it does not matter if some land belongs to them and some people live here instead of there. For eg why usa is not having any conflict with canada ? Why India is not having any conflict with other smaller countries ?
Further if Muslims come out Islam half of world's problem will be solved but it can't happen overnight. They may become aware of the facts about their religion slowly and some change may come in a few decades.
Needless to say there is a huge economic benefit in world peace as all the countries can reduce their defence budget and direct that money for some thing of common concern to all for eg. To stop global warming, prevent sea pollution etc. and also to create jobs.
@@yuanhantian9232 As far economic conflict which you pointed out as reason for arms race I would say
Gandhian economy probably solves this problem. He has said "Earth has enough resources to satisfy man's needs but not his greed" i.e. if everyone wants lifestyle of billionaire this earth can't survive. Before expecting rich nation's to give up their wealth to poorer countries the disparity with in each country has to be resolved. Before we expect billionaires to reduce their luxurious life style everyone has to do that to some degree considering people below him. Of course this can't happen by freewill but only by making and enforcement of strict laws.
Simplicity and uncomplicated life can improve health and reduce stress. Luxury leads to destruction of nature and spoils our health. Instead having luxurious life and burning calories on tread mills we should do physical work. When India was poor we had good health but now with raise in living standards our people's health has gone down. Today we have huge percentage of population that is diabetic. I read somewhere luxurious life style and use of plastic leads to impotence in men. So there is good in going backwards.
United Nations can make a draft law on reduction of luxurious life and circulate that to all countries. USA and other westren countries instead of simply holding some global meeting on on green Earth should accept Gandhian economy first.
Mind Begs the Question:
NATO,Corporates capable to Boycott
Russia over Ukraine/Petro Dollar
NATO,Corporates not capable to Boycott
China over Concentration Camps?
России на пользу слабый лидер, сомневающийся.
но нам после Михаила не везёт, или мы сами выбираем не тех
It has been my experience that Russians as a general rule do not like Gorbachev. Every time I’ve ever brought him up with one of them, I have to stand back. They will turn the air blue with cursing his name. To us here in the west, he is a hero. To them, he is the destroyer of their nation. They see him as the man that ended their greatness on the world stage.
The Soviet Union was kaput before Gorbachev took over. He was allowed to try to get the Soviet system to conform just a LITTLE with reality but it got away from him.
@@wildmouse5888 i’m not arguing the state of the Soviet Union in the time he took office and at the time that it collapsed. I am telling you how they view the man. When it comes to things like this, facts are not as important as perception. He is perceived to be the face of the destruction of the Soviet Union which was the state that had them as a superpower on the world stage. He was the man at the helm when it collapsed. Therefore, in the minds of many, he takes all the blame.
@@philomelodia I am sure that is true. Stupidity is a human condition; not just a Russian one.
Putin has a hand in this.
🤣
Russland GO!!!!!💋💋💋
He was one of the gorbiest world leaders
非常非常感谢您们的支持和提醒！！！
Gorby Gorby
Current Soviet Union President Vladimir Putin
Unfortunately, Gorbachev didn't END the cold war, he only postponed it for awhile. Putin has brought it back along with the Soviet Union.
Ignorant statement. Putin would have preferred to have USSR intact but knew he could not bring it back. The cold war was restarted by the US-led west with first the eastward expansion of NATO and then the 2014 coup in Kiev.
@@goodcomrade4231 Yes, that's a good Russian stooge. You speak well for Putin Good Comrade. But nobody with an ounce of intelligence believes a Russian propagandist..
Don’t you know that in the early days that Russia itself was being discussed in Washington as a potential member of NATO?
@@Geoplanetjane yes, I have read about that: Putin asked why can't Russia join NATO. But no, we need an enemy (or two) and we need wars, because some people are profiting tremendously from continuous fighting, and they can't profit from peace. US is the biggest bully in the world, and I am ashamed of it.
I am a classical liberal and still watch Democracy Now sometimes. Here is one as a starter for your education: ua-cam.com/video/wmOePNsNFw0/v-deo.html
Rip gorby
Putin never liked what gorbachev did
Strange that Sunday Morning, of all channels, has one of the most toxic and bot-filled comment sections on UA-cam…
The story is about Gorbachev so they deemed it a good wedge story to feed upon because Gorbachev was a decent human being who was instrumental in the end of the USSR and the beginning of the Russian federation.
Gorbachev didn't shed a tear for the death USSR. Putin longs for the "good old days" of the Soviet Union. The bots have their marching orders.
Rose tinted goggles. Gorbachev's efforts were towards saving a nightmare regime. Thankfully, as well due to unprecedented internal and outside pressures, he failed. That's why he is loved in the West, because he failed.
Also of course because the media, academia, and decadent elites love fawning over him so they could ignore the efforts of others they don't like.
@@lantrick Gorbachev tried the New Union Treaty and was blocked from doing so.
@@brianwalsh1401 The Russians not understand that!
🤔