Director Paul Thomas Anderson Talks 'Inherent Vice'

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 631

  • @Mvila23
    @Mvila23 8 років тому +316

    Such an underrated gem. It's the type of film where the more you watch it, the better and better it gets.

    • @Gilgaemesh
      @Gilgaemesh 7 років тому +5

      Yes.

    • @TANTHEMANFILMS
      @TANTHEMANFILMS 6 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/cH3I_LD43WE/v-deo.html

    • @jonassteinberg3779
      @jonassteinberg3779 5 років тому +1

      completely agree

    • @WW-sx5zu
      @WW-sx5zu 4 роки тому +2

      but what’s the point of it’s appeal, if it doesn’t make any sense? Nothing at all

    • @davidlean1060
      @davidlean1060 4 роки тому +2

      @@WW-sx5zu Yes it does. You have to remember though, you are seeing the events unfold through the eyes of Doc, a guy who is wacked out on something or other throughout the film. Some stuff he sees is happening, other things are reveries and hallucinations. The second Shasta visit is a reverie for example. If you research Pynchon and how he wrote and what he wrote about in general, you'll get more of a feel for the world as Pynchon paints it.

  • @jeffbriggs1987
    @jeffbriggs1987 10 років тому +302

    This guy's movies are amazing, every time I watch one of his movies I feel weird afterwards like reality itself has changed.

    • @RobertBucchianeri--Author
      @RobertBucchianeri--Author 10 років тому +23

      I feel the same way. My favorite director. His movies just have an electricity, a vive, life force I don't get from any other film maker.

    • @brendantaylor3570
      @brendantaylor3570 9 років тому +6

      Robert Bucchianeri Agreed with both of you...I think it's his level of emotion/imagination inherent in his personality that translates in all of his films. Great filmmakers can create a world of their own to a degree.

    • @aintnoluckitsskillz
      @aintnoluckitsskillz 9 років тому +3

      I know what you mean. Inherent Vice and The Master in particular.

    • @dfaz917
      @dfaz917 9 років тому +1

      J Briggs Same I get it from other directors too like Harmony Korine. Good books as well

    • @BrettWPlank
      @BrettWPlank 8 років тому +1

      The opening scene of Magnolia gives me the chills - he knows how to work your emotions.

  • @Chazz-tastic
    @Chazz-tastic 10 років тому +215

    How PT Anderson has not won an oscar is beyond me.....He is a fucking genius. Boogie Nights, Magnolia, There Will Be Blood, The Master.....and now Inherent Vice. COME ON ACADEMY!

    • @gloverelaxis
      @gloverelaxis 4 роки тому +6

      I loved Vice and Blood, but Magnolia infuriated me like no other film ever has. I despise that fucking movie so much. It was so full of itself and so unearned.

    • @benjamindixon1904
      @benjamindixon1904 4 роки тому +1

      @@gloverelaxis not disagreeing but how was it full of itself? I like magnolia but there were definitely some cringe parts like the frog scene

    • @foosbooze263
      @foosbooze263 3 роки тому +5

      PTA joins Alfred Hitchcock, Robert Altman, Stanley Kubrick, and countless foreign masters who haven’t won one. Honestly between the directors who’ve won one and the field who hasn’t, I’ll go field. So many greats go unnoticed/get one as an honorary award when they’re 80+.

    • @wilwilson8146
      @wilwilson8146 3 роки тому +8

      Golden fang dont want him to have one

    • @user-gg6sh7wr6d
      @user-gg6sh7wr6d 3 роки тому +5

      @@foosbooze263 orson Welles as well

  • @VICE
    @VICE  10 років тому +30

    Meredith Danluck sits down with filmmaker Paul Thomas Anderson to talk about his new surf noir, an adaptation of Thomas Pynchon's 2009 novel, _Inherent Vice_. He also shares an exclusive trailer: bit.ly/1yG5d3D

    • @DarkAngelEU
      @DarkAngelEU 10 років тому +3

      I think Meredith is getting on a lil surf in her noir, if you know what I mean ;)

    • @larrynewman5286
      @larrynewman5286 10 років тому +21

      Fire her! Is it too hard to ask real questions?

    • @kdhfkjdgkjj
      @kdhfkjdgkjj 10 років тому +1

      Larry Newman
      At the end of the day, maybe it is.

    • @tomjones560
      @tomjones560 10 років тому +7

      Scott Coveau It's not.

    • @Vitojjh
      @Vitojjh 10 років тому +2

      The interviewer is so cool I mean shitty, fucking, I'd like to grind her glasses with my boot heal while on her face,

  • @tonywords6713
    @tonywords6713 3 роки тому +51

    Mr Anderson is very clever in that he never over intellectualizes the subconcious and unconcious themes but lets them flow naturally.

  • @StezeSix
    @StezeSix 9 років тому +214

    It looks like he stole that sweater, straight up from Daniel Plainview.

  • @kryptonickraze
    @kryptonickraze 10 років тому +75

    This movie is basically a paranoid 70s version of The Big Lebowski. Awesome.

    • @themattpack1
      @themattpack1 Рік тому +3

      Not really

    • @tonywords6713
      @tonywords6713 Рік тому +3

      That movie already exists though it's called the long goodbye

    • @RobertSlover
      @RobertSlover 10 місяців тому +1

      @@tonywords6713 excellent! robert altman and elliot gould

  • @Sunviewer338
    @Sunviewer338 11 місяців тому +5

    It's impossible for me to overstate how much I love this movie. Having said that, it's not for everyone.

  • @citizentuck
    @citizentuck 10 років тому +44

    One thing that really stood out to me was how PERFECTLY he used Neil young's harvest.

    • @johnwayne7201
      @johnwayne7201 Рік тому +1

      8 years later and this comment never rang more true

  • @quinn959
    @quinn959 10 років тому +37

    PTA is unquestionably the greatest living filmmaker at this point. This guy just blows my mind with every new picture. A lot of people are completely missing the point of this film and the style PTA was going for. One of the best of the year without a doubt though. PTA is a GOD!

    • @guciowitomski3825
      @guciowitomski3825 Рік тому

      with every picture apart from anything related to Jackass
      But, yeah, he is the greatest alive right now. He might be one of the best of all time

  • @hermanmelville3871
    @hermanmelville3871 10 років тому +101

    Finally an interview with a real director!

    • @assquiat
      @assquiat 10 років тому +9

      Hey Bennet Miller is pretty great too

    • @circularsky
      @circularsky 10 років тому +3

      Iker C Ehhh....

    • @CitizenToxie72
      @CitizenToxie72 10 років тому +2

      too bad the interviewer sucks

    • @hermanmelville3871
      @hermanmelville3871 10 років тому +7

      CitizenToxie72 Vice isn't exactly known for having the best interviewers. I'm just happy that it wasn't some entitled hipster being rammed down our throats.

    • @CitizenToxie72
      @CitizenToxie72 10 років тому

      Herman Melville Im pretty unfamiliar with their shit so I wouldn't know. I was excited to watch this but ended up turning it off about half way through

  • @guciowitomski3825
    @guciowitomski3825 Рік тому +9

    I love this movie so much. I can watch it literally on repeat, because as soon as the end credits roll I don't remember a single plot point. It's just like with "The Big Sleep" with Humphrey Boggart. As soon as the end credits roll, you can rewatch it again happily, as you don't remember who was the culprit.

    • @Sunviewer338
      @Sunviewer338 11 місяців тому +1

      I totally agree. I think you can zone out and come back to it and pick right back up.

    • @guciowitomski3825
      @guciowitomski3825 11 місяців тому +2

      @@Sunviewer338 all the characters being stoned all the time certainly helps with that
      They don’t know what’s happening either

  • @tommyo.3535
    @tommyo.3535 6 років тому +10

    It never occurred to me until now that every good screenwriter has probably memorized their entire script...

  • @tantivymuckermaffikk
    @tantivymuckermaffikk 10 років тому +53

    The greatest director working today. Will one day sit alongside Kubrick, Kurosawa, Herzog, as the greatest ever.

    • @vorjay
      @vorjay 10 років тому +4

      no, just no!

    • @EisforEvil
      @EisforEvil 10 років тому +1

      Stop.

    • @Hangglidersinspace
      @Hangglidersinspace 10 років тому +1

      Ohhhhh, I think I remember something about people posting accepted social truths disguised as legitimate praise. Great job.

    • @vorjay
      @vorjay 10 років тому

      ***** apparently you haven't watched inherent vice

    • @vorjay
      @vorjay 10 років тому

      ***** it was garbage, an unfunny embarrassment of a film. A wannabe Big Lebowski.

  • @CorboWill
    @CorboWill 4 роки тому +15

    Stop complaining about the interviewer's style. If you've watched a lot of PTA interviews you can tell he usually gets annoyed by a lot of the questions. The interviewer here had a more conversational attitude, and it worked to get Paul talking comfortably.
    I think many of the people commenting wouldn't be saying anything about this if the interviewer was male. Much of vice's audience skews male so I'm not surprised at the hateful comments. But guys you gotta realize if the answers to the interview are good then it's a good interview.
    I came to read comments about Inherent Vice and PTA, not to write one defending this very fine interview.

  • @bredlo
    @bredlo 10 років тому +87

    It's nice to see Zach Galafanakis slimming down and getting serious for a change.

    • @mitchellhughes5180
      @mitchellhughes5180 4 роки тому +2

      Ba dum tss!

    • @the-bottom-of-a-black-hole-.
      @the-bottom-of-a-black-hole-. 3 роки тому

      It's nice that some dude who hasn't written a thing can make a comment without the pleasure of being asked. Enjoy your nine to five you f word for cuss. Your girlfriend must be proud how you can fart in front of her and think it's cute and not just you being lazy.
      ,dan'

    • @reuben7548
      @reuben7548 3 роки тому

      ?

  • @jamesdelcol3701
    @jamesdelcol3701 7 місяців тому +2

    I read Pynchon. This movie had that feel. I don't know how they captured all that so nicely. Paul is kind of amazing. Pynchon is by far the hardest literary writer. His narratives are never linear. The script must have been like a madman's writings.

  • @Aldarux
    @Aldarux 10 років тому +10

    Please, more interviews like this, VICE! I love this sort of stuff.

  • @GiantSandles
    @GiantSandles 9 років тому +28

    Inherent Vice was really underrated, I enjoyed it pretty much the whole way through despite the plot not being the most coherent towards the end. I've not watched it again yet but it's probably better on repeat viewings too, like all of his stuff since Punch Drunk Love (which I remember not liking very much at all when I first saw it and now it might be my favourite movie)

    • @GiantSandles
      @GiantSandles 8 років тому +5

      Nové Můra Thanks for letting me know I'm objectively wrong, I'm gonna stop enjoying the movie now

    • @withnail-and-i
      @withnail-and-i 8 років тому

      I think it's vastly underrated

  • @TheLivirus
    @TheLivirus 10 років тому +26

    Would this interview have happened if "vice" wasn't in the title?

  • @shanemiller6157
    @shanemiller6157 10 років тому +123

    An interviewer should be no-one. Short questions, insightful questions, the more open-ended the better. The point is to get the interviewee talking, it is not to introduce your own interpretations, asinine notions, etc. The interviewee should be going off of minimal goading, stream of consciousness, they should not have to be reacting to the interviewer's interpretations-

    • @birdland1752
      @birdland1752 9 років тому +2

      Sigismund Schlomo Freud she is terrible.. what do you expect from this channel

    • @ThePrimordialChronicles
      @ThePrimordialChronicles 7 років тому +4

      Sigismund Schlomo Freud LoL,you guys got trigerred by this chick so badly :p

    • @TheIceboxjim
      @TheIceboxjim 5 років тому

      what do you think the role of criticism is lol? the director of the movie should be asked questions about interpretations of it unless theyre david lynch LOL

  • @natefusillo6578
    @natefusillo6578 11 місяців тому +2

    Awesome director. Awesome interviewer. Asked some uniquely good questions, seemed to really get it. Hell yeah

  • @skyblueerik
    @skyblueerik 10 років тому +3

    I have been looking forward to this for a very long time, watched the trailer a million times, and now it's not going to be at any theater near me (at least not right away). FML.

  • @BenjaminQuinlan
    @BenjaminQuinlan 9 років тому +5

    I haven't seen the movie yet, but I found this interview style refreshing. I like the conversation-style much better than those terrible recycled questions that directors and actors have to churn out the same b.s. for.

  • @FrancoisDressler
    @FrancoisDressler 8 років тому +12

    How is it possible for the esteemed interviewee to be more humble than the interviewer?
    Then again, it could be much worse. Just look at that recent Duncan Jones interview.

  • @EveForbiddenFruit
    @EveForbiddenFruit 7 років тому +9

    Just to let you all know, Meredith Danluck is not a journalist. She's another filmmaker. That's why she's having a discussion with him on film as opposed to asking him traditional questions.

  • @chriswright4677
    @chriswright4677 Рік тому +5

    Do we need this huge bar at the bottom of the screen?

  • @dl5272
    @dl5272 8 років тому +52

    I randomly clicked on 5 spots throughout this video, she was talking in 4 of them.

    • @axl1555
      @axl1555 5 років тому +6

      this dosen't mean shit, random is random

  • @gozirimuu
    @gozirimuu Рік тому +2

    I love how PTA is so very American, he’s the embodiment of the true American spirit in a filmmaker. Lovely stuff

  • @BubbaHotepMothership
    @BubbaHotepMothership 4 роки тому +7

    Anderson, great director meets Thomas Pynchon who has to be our greatest living novelist. I’m reading Pynchon’s “Against The Day.” Amazing. So good it’s impossible to put down & impossible to read in the time of COVID. Reviewers said the book doesn’t need to be not read it needs to be studied.

    • @davidlean1060
      @davidlean1060 4 роки тому +7

      I just watched The Master and there is a reference to the book title in a line spoken by Dodd. 'we fought against the day and we won, we won'.

    • @theunpossiblefile
      @theunpossiblefile 4 роки тому

      @David Lean - I remember The Master fight scene between Hoffman as L Ron Hubbard & Phoenix. I’ll see it again. “Against The Day” title is biblical, “the heavens and the earth ... [are] reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men." (Tarantino movie). Against The Day is meta fiction & meta reality that’s supposed to be superstition & delusion but isn’t. Bilocation, temporal displacement etc. Might be why Pynchon leaves no trace of himself apart from weird fiction & one Inherent Vice movie. Inherent Vice or IV, a clue as to how anyone can write like him.

  • @WINFIELD32750
    @WINFIELD32750 9 років тому +37

    He needs to do an interview with Zach Galifanakis, that would trip me out

    • @MrUndersolo
      @MrUndersolo 7 років тому +1

      winfield pearson I think you mean a movie.

  • @cicolasnage5684
    @cicolasnage5684 3 роки тому +7

    It took me 7 years... 7 years to “get this film” and mind you I am a major admirer of Anderson’s oeuvre and have been so for 21 years. I was very hyped for this movie when the first trailer was released and thought it was going to be a tru out and out comedy. I was sorely let down and found it ( at first mind you to be a meandering, mumbling mess that made no sense). But as of just recently ( and I do mean just recently.... yesterday in fact) I adjusted the volume settings on my t.v and tuned out all distractions and really truly watched and listened to the movie ( when I watch Anderson I really mainly watch for the visuals, I love his cinematography and camera movements). And boy was I wrong, it is such a beautiful movie , labyrinthine and engaging with this underlying melancholy and sadness. I think a lot of my problem was some of the dialogue was “mumbly” which Inherent Vice is one of those films where you cannot be just a casual viewer and must really pay attention to every single speck of dialogue to put the peices of the jigsaw puzzle like plot together. Underrated gem of a movie.

    • @N0va
      @N0va 2 роки тому +1

      If it takes 7 years to like a film, It's probably failing at getting its ideas across. Huge PTA fan but I just watched this last night again and it's pure hogwash lol

    • @mohammedashian8094
      @mohammedashian8094 2 роки тому +4

      @@N0va I’m mean on the surface sure it doesn’t make a lick of sense but considering that’s how Thomas Pynchon writes you could kinda say that it worked it wasn’t really about a plot it was more about the atmosphere of the 60s slowly fading away and transitioning into the 70s

    • @N0va
      @N0va 2 роки тому

      @@mohammedashian8094 I actually read the book and loved the themes in it. Feels like the ideas come across way better in the novel. It's still a tough read but it makes sense.

    • @itsaUSBline
      @itsaUSBline 2 роки тому +1

      @@N0va I just finished reading it for the first time the other day, and something that struck me was the way a lot of important context regarding the meaning of certain scenes is conveyed through the prose itself, like the way things in the narration are described, and I feel like that wouldn't necessarily translate very well to film.

    • @j.d.snyder4466
      @j.d.snyder4466 2 роки тому

      ​@@mohammedashian8094 You nailed it!

  • @TotFilmsProduction
    @TotFilmsProduction 10 років тому +18

    When I first watched the film I kind of though it was boring... Then I watched it for the second time, I LOVED it! LOVED IT I TELL YA!

    • @majortom4658
      @majortom4658 5 років тому

      You got it right the first time & the novel is even worse, boring is an understatement for this film It was so obvious that he was never stoned during any of the movie & pretending to smoke weed & trying to be funny was exhausting to watch !

    • @itsaUSBline
      @itsaUSBline 2 роки тому +1

      @@majortom4658 Haven't seen the movie yet but I just finished the novel and it was absolutely incredible. The sheer precision of Pynchon's prose is truly something to behold, and I wonder how well that could translate to film, because a lot of the important meaning and context for things that happen is expressed through the phrasing and way that things are described within the book's narration rather than what's actually happening.

  • @kwastimus
    @kwastimus 10 років тому +195

    Glad to see PTA, but awful interviewer... ask more, talk less, no one cares about the fact that the shots almost made you fall off your chair

    • @zekecohen8719
      @zekecohen8719 10 років тому +24

      I'm really glad you brought that up. I completely agree. She seems like one of those pretentious Sundance Q&Aers. "Um, I am really observant, and a really good filmmaker. Thanks, thats all I had to say."

    • @DarkAngelEU
      @DarkAngelEU 10 років тому +19

      She isn't pretentious, she's obviously wetting her panties over talking with Paul.

    • @DarkAngelEU
      @DarkAngelEU 10 років тому +3

      ***** I'd give her a different pair, true but she does seem a bit like a control freak so maybe they do fit her after all.. aw yeah the word is authority, not pretentious. Pretentious is you telling others what not to wear

    • @DarkAngelEU
      @DarkAngelEU 10 років тому

      ***** Sorry about that last part, I must've read your comment wrong. I'm rather tired from work lately

    • @IdoF47
      @IdoF47 10 років тому

      lol, i read it seconds before she said it and it was perfect

  • @d1e1c0k2
    @d1e1c0k2 8 років тому +31

    I've seen Inherant Vice 4 times now I think and I'm still not 100% sure what actually f*ckin' happens

    • @jonassteinberg3779
      @jonassteinberg3779 5 років тому +8

      This is the only movie I've ever seen where I can confidently say that the confusing part is the amount of dialogue which is plot critical that might slip by the first several viewings, as opposed to "this is vapid pretense passing as art". The plot is there. I've seen it about 10 times now and I get pretty much exactly what's happening. It's just that there's a lot of important dialogue.

    • @WW-sx5zu
      @WW-sx5zu 4 роки тому

      @@jonassteinberg3779 so what’s happening? :)))

    • @davidlean1060
      @davidlean1060 4 роки тому +1

      @@WW-sx5zu As wolfman tells Doc early on, 'she's gone'. She got caught up with Wolfman and that was that. There are a number of different stories that intersect, much like in Magnolia, only in this film, we see the events through the eyes of Doc, who is stoned the whole movie! He's not an unreliable narrator as such, he just too high to see things as they are. Often times, things that appear to be happening to Doc are drug fueled reveries! Shasta's second visit to him, that's in Doc's imagination. For a better insight, I'd take a look at the wiki guide to the novel. It will go in to 'the day that happens twice'. That may help you get the movie more.

    • @Whocares1987
      @Whocares1987 5 місяців тому

      @@davidlean1060true Pynchon fans know about the Wiki

  • @BurghartBrothers
    @BurghartBrothers 9 років тому +11

    It's Inherent to me that Vice would like Inherent Vice.
    (hold for applause)

  • @bernardopaganelli8411
    @bernardopaganelli8411 9 місяців тому

    Paul if you are reading this THANK YOU, you are the man of my life

  • @mind_bahn
    @mind_bahn 9 років тому +24

    He reminds me a lot of Thom Yorke

    • @EisforEvil
      @EisforEvil 8 років тому +3

      +Sergio Calzada Well he just directed Thom Yorke in "Daydreaming".

    • @ferouihamza
      @ferouihamza 5 років тому +1

      he's a radiohead fan

    • @ATCrogerwilco
      @ATCrogerwilco 4 роки тому

      Check out "Amana" on Netflix. He just directed that short with yorke

  • @the-bottom-of-a-black-hole-.
    @the-bottom-of-a-black-hole-. 3 роки тому +3

    "The wind brought the desert to the sky to taste it. The horizon brought you the sea and didn't give it to you but let you drink."
    ,dan' (thirst as I have and starve to life as I hope to do)

  • @lazyguy348
    @lazyguy348 10 років тому +23

    She needs to let him talk more....I'm not watching this interview to hear how much she has to say...

  • @jffsmth330
    @jffsmth330 7 років тому +7

    "America's Funniest Home Videos is big around my house."
    And that's why PTA is so good- he's down to Earth and not so self-infatuated like Tarantino.

  • @leoneranger9348
    @leoneranger9348 7 років тому +2

    I so agree with PTA about actors. It is a noble craft, because that labour can only be sustained by love. It's HARD! No quick wins, no easy outs. I admire the persistence and commitment of my actor friends all the time.
    ONA, the interview style is conversational, a modern trait, but PTA goes along with it so we end up with a really nice exchange and insight into his film.

  • @raptor182cmn
    @raptor182cmn 5 років тому +4

    I wasn't completely sure she was dead until the scene between Doc and Mickey Wolfman. Most importantly it was not the words they were speaking specifically.. it was Eric Roberts eyes when he's asked "Where's Shasta". As soon as I saw Roberts eyes I knew absolutely 100% she was gone. Shasta went out on the boat with the Aryan Brotherhood guy with the swastika on his face, because he came back from the boat ride with Shasta's favorite necklace that she never parts with. Roberts eyes, the necklace, and in retrospect the first phone call between Doc and Bigfoot. Bigfoot yelled sternly about Shasta being gone. SHES GONE. SHES GONE DOC. MOVE ON.
    I don't know what PTA said to Eric Roberts to get that scene out of him, it was amazing. I haven't really thought of Eric Roberts as a nuanced actor, historically Roberts wheelhouse is more being obnoxious, at little slimy, and then throw in an ugly-cry in there somewhere. Roberts eyes in this movie express tenderness and regret and sadness. Great Job everyone!

  • @mysteryman040896
    @mysteryman040896 10 років тому +6

    It's nice when a reporter knows what they're talking about

    • @RobertSlover
      @RobertSlover 10 місяців тому +1

      it is indeed but not this one....

  • @pamelasupanick2620
    @pamelasupanick2620 6 років тому +3

    the movie is truly a linear story with rich characters. It is a story that takes me some place. I feel as though I can ride along and that I want to ride along. It is an honest story, as it depicts human nature truthfully. It has the level of the characters and how they interact, and then it has the level of what is happening in the culture, and it tells both those stories extremely well, simply by depicting human nature honestly.

  • @Sheisthedevilyouknowwho-ft9we
    @Sheisthedevilyouknowwho-ft9we 6 місяців тому

    I can't even imagine how his mind works. Amazing

  • @fartboxer22
    @fartboxer22 5 років тому +5

    Greatest living filmmaker

  • @Caligula138
    @Caligula138 10 років тому +2

    A Pynchon movie?! Holy shit!

  • @joeb5765
    @joeb5765 3 роки тому +4

    Its embarrassing when you fancy the interviewee so much that you start spounting stuff like: "Acting: I think its the hardest job you can do.".

  • @supergangsterish1
    @supergangsterish1 10 років тому +6

    man's a genius

  • @bassplayinben
    @bassplayinben 8 років тому +33

    this interview would have been better just letting PTA talk

    • @thesuperspaz96
      @thesuperspaz96 3 роки тому +1

      i thought the interviewer asked great questions and had great insight while still letting PTA do his thing

    • @GhostStories5150
      @GhostStories5150 2 роки тому

      @@thesuperspaz96 which is rly refreshing cuz a lot of pta interviews have been ruined by the interviewee imo

  • @mobbinhard42
    @mobbinhard42 9 років тому +1

    vice has the best interviewers!! tired of watching interviews where the interviewer is sucking cliche information out of the guest..genuine interest is key

  • @HerbieChuckNorris
    @HerbieChuckNorris 8 років тому +7

    Thinking of his plane analogy being a sly way of saying smoke a joint

  • @TheRubberStudiosASMR
    @TheRubberStudiosASMR 7 років тому

    The trailer was so bad I’m glad I just went into this film cold. I’ve seen it about 10 times now. His films just take you on so many different journeys.

  • @ManigoldMultimedia
    @ManigoldMultimedia 10 років тому +4

    This is a "conversation" NOT an interview.

  • @username4570
    @username4570 7 років тому +3

    He has such an opposite perspective on watching movies in a plane than anyone I've ever met.

  • @jessedampolo
    @jessedampolo 9 років тому +8

    Alot of these Vice Film interviews seem to be about the interviewer trying to show how smart and "in the know" they are.

    • @user82938
      @user82938 3 роки тому

      She's a cool lady in LA. That's their deal.

  • @OldMoneyAudition09
    @OldMoneyAudition09 7 років тому +1

    An interview with Meredith Danluck as she interprets the film Inherent Vice for the viewers.

  • @grubwithgreg
    @grubwithgreg 4 місяці тому

    Awesome director! I would have expected his voice to sound a bit more like his father’s (rip Ernie Anderson)

  • @DanimationMovies
    @DanimationMovies 6 років тому +6

    This is such a stoner convo I love it

  • @soultrane126
    @soultrane126 8 років тому +1

    anyone knows where i can see this movie?? please i need to see it :(

  • @jacoporamellapajrin7650
    @jacoporamellapajrin7650 8 років тому +12

    I'd love to see a Paul Thomas Anderson movie inspired by Infinite Jest.

    • @NASkeywest
      @NASkeywest 3 роки тому +1

      Damn. That’s would be hardcore.

    • @reinarforeman6518
      @reinarforeman6518 3 роки тому +2

      He did.... it's called Magnolia 🤷‍♂️

  • @shimlaDnB
    @shimlaDnB 10 років тому +36

    i;m drunk and your glasses are to big

  • @vibhumalik3247
    @vibhumalik3247 3 роки тому +1

    imo, people got so involved in the plot that they didn't realise how funny the movie actually is!

  • @louisstevensexperience2984
    @louisstevensexperience2984 7 років тому +2

    Would love to see him and Fincher conversate.

    • @AnmolSingh-xy2uu
      @AnmolSingh-xy2uu 7 років тому

      Louis Stevens Experience You won't because Paul and David are not on good terms. Paul bad-mouthed Fight Club and also wished death on David .

    • @louisstevensexperience2984
      @louisstevensexperience2984 7 років тому

      Anmol Singh
      Yea but Paul has since apologized, so there's that. As for the whole inception of the predicament I think it's just ridiculous on Paul's part for him to say what he said.

  • @marijavinkele
    @marijavinkele 10 років тому +1

    really excited for this movie, but since it doesnt come out here until late feb, im gonna have to wait for a week until screeners show up online
    im really excited for joaquin's performance, since i liked the book so much and i wanna see how he plays doc

  • @giancassa9340
    @giancassa9340 2 роки тому +2

    Man I love PTA

  • @rascalthecat666
    @rascalthecat666 4 роки тому +2

    I think the interviewer did fine? Lol y’all are babies

  • @pollitttyler
    @pollitttyler 9 років тому

    I see people arguing about Nolan in the comments section and I saw someone claim that his films are original and innovative. I just have one thing to say, There will be Blood is about as original and innovative as you can get, it is a true masterwork.

    • @kkkkkk-sj3wu
      @kkkkkk-sj3wu 5 років тому

      it's book adaptation dude

    • @BeachSkies
      @BeachSkies 5 років тому +1

      qwe qwe the story called Oil was just a setup for the movie. I saw a whole hourlong interview where PTA and DDL confirm this

  • @MrVisde
    @MrVisde 3 роки тому +4

    I love PTA. But let him speak. Not a great interview. His thoughts kept getting interrupted with clips and the interviewer is not even asking questions 🤣 Just showing how smart she is.

  • @baronvonpenguin6112
    @baronvonpenguin6112 8 років тому +9

    If I didn't know any better, I could've sworn that was Mark Hamill.

  • @drewpearson4582
    @drewpearson4582 10 років тому +3

    youre infront of possibly the greatest living director... and instead of asking questions, you just talk about yourself and what you liked about the movie... what a let down

  • @StanfordCrane
    @StanfordCrane 10 років тому +2

    Excellent director and a great interview, although I kinda felt the Meredith should have dismissed the crew and gone at it, in the parlance of the day. There was some chemistry there.

  • @DrunkenM33rkat
    @DrunkenM33rkat 10 років тому

    Can't wait to see this

  • @smilingface4222
    @smilingface4222 3 роки тому

    That part about Hope Harlingen was great

  • @keywolf23
    @keywolf23 10 років тому +29

    Jesus, UA-cam is just full of you unsatisfied phlegm. I'm not talking about everyone in general, only referring to a few reoccurring comments that I have seen. This is all too common on these interviews on Vice. I, for one, thought that it was quite a simple, fun interview with a very talented, yet humble director. What more do you people want? Instead on bullhead bashing the interviewer of doing a bad job, remark on what they should be focusing on instead.
    Thank you for reading, sorry to sound ranty. Have a good one. :)

    • @Hangglidersinspace
      @Hangglidersinspace 10 років тому +1

      Keywolf23, you're really pushing my buttons.

    • @WalkingDeadKiller
      @WalkingDeadKiller 10 років тому +1

      Is it wrong to expect a certain standard from any mode of entertainment? Jesus

    • @girlspooptoo8567
      @girlspooptoo8567 7 років тому

      keywolf23
      Yeah stop talking shit and start laying down some constructive criticism
      That being said. I think she could have asked more open-ended questions.

    • @CorboWill
      @CorboWill 4 роки тому

      If the interviewer was male no one would have said anything

  • @Matthewboudreau
    @Matthewboudreau 10 років тому +7

    this interview is horrible, let PTA speak, don't dilute his conscience with your opinions

  • @lifeinpictures
    @lifeinpictures 10 років тому +1

    I've never hear of Meredith Danluck before, but, I will never forget her now, She is AWESOME. And PTA is always an intelligent, understated gentleman. I wish he'd shave, but I get it, he's like some "hipster dufis from the Slower east side"
    a man of the people.... SHAVE, and put on an Armani suit already!!! We will still love and respect you and see your films.

    • @freshrr2
      @freshrr2 10 років тому +2

      Yea he's always kinda looked/been like that tho. I don't want to see him lookin like Nolan or anything, personally..

    • @lifeinpictures
      @lifeinpictures 10 років тому

      ssevf Because.

    • @lifeinpictures
      @lifeinpictures 10 років тому +1

      freshrr2 Because he is still too young and good looking, he can pull a "Brando" in 15 years if he wants. Ugh, young people are so stupid!! If that comment makes you or anyone else mad it's because your young and Stupid.

  • @TheCinemaMan777
    @TheCinemaMan777 10 років тому +2

    Am i the only one who walked out loving this movie to death

  • @thedeviator5410
    @thedeviator5410 2 місяці тому

    PTA’s the man, great interviewer! Knew her stuff

  • @B_uttcrumbs
    @B_uttcrumbs 10 років тому +66

    Ask him why he made a movie that is 150 minutes of people whispering to each other.

    • @HotNTediousFilms
      @HotNTediousFilms 10 років тому +44

      i loved the movie and this is a great comment

    • @CitizenToxie72
      @CitizenToxie72 10 років тому +8

      maybe you should get you're hearing checked? Anyways....it's a homage to PTA's hero, Robert Altman, who was well known for using overlapping and unintelligible dialogue in his films

    • @matthewferguson1429
      @matthewferguson1429 10 років тому +6

      +citizentoxie52 yeah that's nice and all, but I would still like to hear the dialogue, call me old fashioned.

    • @CitizenToxie72
      @CitizenToxie72 10 років тому +12

      Matthew Ferguson Maybe just old? I could hear most of the dialogue perfectly fine

    • @rivalshawns
      @rivalshawns 10 років тому +6

      Yeah, and the narrator's voice was very annoying.

  • @chanm01
    @chanm01 7 років тому +1

    Great interview!
    The only thing that really bothered me was the way they kept pronouncing Pynchon... Yes, I know there is some disagreement out there about how it is really pronounced. I'm just used to hearing it the other way, both in my own head when I read his name, and typically when I hear other people discuss his books.

  • @johnloraditch9562
    @johnloraditch9562 5 років тому

    Meredith Danluck....she had a movie come out last month...”State like sleep”... according to Wikipedia it grossed $4282.00

  • @Hangglidersinspace
    @Hangglidersinspace 10 років тому

    Paul Thomas Anderson is a famous director.

  • @wtfarockfish
    @wtfarockfish 10 років тому +1

    I get the sense the interviewer would much rather interview herself.

  • @rusamene
    @rusamene 7 років тому +1

    i love this movie so much

  • @jenkins599
    @jenkins599 Рік тому

    Such a great movie

  • @Caaarrl94
    @Caaarrl94 10 років тому +1

    I think some directors (like scorcese) really don't need fantastic actors to make a great film.
    I get the feeling that Paul thomas anderson NEEDS an amazing actor like daniel day lewis or joaquin phoenix to make a great film. I feel like he needs an actor who can match him on every level, who he can trust to colaborate, improvise and to create his masterpiece. And when he get's it right and it all comes together (there will be blood) - he is probably the best english language director in the world.

    • @nedisahonkey
      @nedisahonkey 7 років тому

      Daddy Dana Holy shit om not even an MMA fan and your profile picture is amazing.

  • @JimiJames
    @JimiJames 10 років тому +2

    VICE, why is there an annoying GIANT graphic on the youtube screen telling me I can skip around on a 20 minute interview? It's distracting as all hell. Please demote whichever creative was responsible for that idiocy.

  • @44y4l4
    @44y4l4 3 роки тому +2

    Love this movie. My favourite character's gotta be Bigfoot Bjornsen

  • @ElRadioDJ913
    @ElRadioDJ913 4 роки тому +3

    The most misunderstood film ever. I thought this movie was amazing.

  • @Zegeebwah
    @Zegeebwah 7 років тому +3

    It seems like he kinda doesn't know how he feels about his own movie.

  • @paulelroy6650
    @paulelroy6650 4 роки тому +2

    I dont understand the hate this woman is getting in the comments. She actually asks really good question brought interesting stuff.
    Yet people are saying shes pretentious or sucks. What do you want her to ask " So Paul do you like making movies".
    Maybe you guys are better off watching a hack like Fallen or Kimmel

    • @alexthomas7923
      @alexthomas7923 3 роки тому +1

      i don’t get it either. especially for a vice correspondent, she sounds like she actually cares deeply about the topic at hand and wants him to get great answers out of him

    • @behemoth5344
      @behemoth5344 2 роки тому

      hey, what's this funny smell? i think it's her vocal cords frying.

  • @dford145
    @dford145 10 років тому +1

    Love it!

  • @bandplyrb7892
    @bandplyrb7892 7 років тому

    Came to watch PTA. Got 15 mins of her talking, 2 mins of film clips & 3 mins of PTA saying “well it’s really not that deep fam”

  • @trevornicolas684
    @trevornicolas684 3 роки тому +3

    You get more and more out of this film every time you watch it .

  • @welosanGeles
    @welosanGeles 2 місяці тому

    Attempting to control the narrative with Paul Thomas Anderson

  • @Mr06261984
    @Mr06261984 7 років тому +1

    pta is a smooth guy

  • @TheLivirus
    @TheLivirus 10 років тому +6

    His hair and clothes tells me she had to wake him up for the interview.

  • @Pantano63
    @Pantano63 9 років тому +1

    So he just said his own movie is "kinda boring", why saying that? Wonder why it only got half its budget.