Norden was actually summoned "properly" at one point.........by Zoodiac. When Zoodiac was still dominating the meta, they incorporated Fusion Substitute into their combos and used it to fuse two of their Xyz into Norden to extend their plays.
I like the idea of fixing ariseheart. Didn’t know if it would be possible. So many banned cards could honestly be unbanned by simply restricting it to its own archetype instead of being too generic. Looking at link monsters mostly.
If they didn't errata Chaos Emperor Dragon, then it would of never gotten unbanned. As it's original effect is still way to strong even for modern Yu-Gi-Oh. I mean sending both players into top deck mode whenever you want upon it's summon is busted AF
Agree i get it getting a once per turn for it burn effect but making it be the only effect that turn make a card that was supposed to be a rival to BLS envy of chaos and turned it into a gimmicky otk deck hurts. @@makenaiyomi1083
@@makenaiyomi1083 i do agree, but at the same time. The errata CED got was the only errata it could of gotten, which would of allowed it to get unbanned.
I think the fact that there are so many link2s that special something but almost never have to summon to their zone is just criminal. Konami simply decided that the link arrows dont matter in these cases.
Grinder Golem. Just add this: if summoned this way, this card cannot declare an attack, can only be destroyed by battle and cannot leave the field by any other way until your opponents next end phase. This makes it so that GG can't be bounced by link effects and still can be used effectively only once.
One simple Errata for ED cards is to either tighten their material requirements. Other options are to have clause where they can only use ONE out of 2-3 effects per turn, so there's actual decision making involved rather than just activate activate activate or lock your special summon for the TURN not for the rest of the turn, to a specific type or attribute, so you lose access to other powerful cards making your board still strong just not overpowered where the opponent cannot play at all.
If Norden had the reatriction that you banished materials for the summon, it wouldn't work in its own archetype. The goal was to summon azathoth with synchro, fusion, and xyz monsters but banishing the materials would be counterintuitive. By just having one of required materials be a monster you control would be enough with super poly.
1. For crystron i would make it state monsters that share the same name as the tuner can't use their effects the turn that it is summoned and that they can't be used for tribute or the summon of extra deck monsters other than synchros. 2. Norden i think needs the simple change of its materials to be (1 synchro/xyz) + ( one monster special summoned from the extra deck). This way it is still a good super poly target with more options but decks that recycle their monsters or only need 1 extra deck monster on field like branded, snake eyes, and tenpai can easily play around it.
If we're going to errata cards to make broken banned cards worse, then I will only accept this if you errata garbage cards that should've been good to be better... If you are allowed to errata halq to be worse, then it's only fair to errata bujinki to be better... Make it so it will summon a monster with the same level from your graveyard and your hand *OR DECK* (not just only your hand, but can also summon from the deck). It needs so much set up and luck of the draw that it's trash.
I want to see Union Carrier come back for ABC. Changing its materials to require 2 light machine union monsters would make it less accessible to decks that want to abuse it, and ABC can still have access to it to make Cyber Dragon Infinity.
I appreciate the effort you put into the video but I would say without a doubt that many of the changes you would make to the cards you listed are the least elegant and clean solutions I have ever heard. Often the effects change functioning for no real reason: 1) I don't get Halq asking for a lv3 or lower tuner "to not be splashed in certain decks", you didn't give any concrete examples of these decks (I guess you wanted to prevent Mathmech from using it?). The problem was never that it could use lv4 tuners. 2) Elder Entity Norden's second proposed errata makes it a contact fusion for no real reason, and completely changes how the card works. But I agree that you should have to use your monsters (requiring at least one to be yours is already fine in my opinion). 3) Before fixing maxx C I would see what Konami is cooking with the Multchummy archetype, but if you really want to give an errata now to Maxx C you must necessarily add "You have to control no cards" to be able to activate it. 4) As you said a HOPT on level eater would fix the card in an elegant way but if you want to keep the old functioning and summon it several times in monarch/synchro deck then losing a card in hand would make it complete packfiller garbage as well as not maintaining what the card did. Then the fact that the card in your errata now lists "Link monsters" in the text is very strange and Konami tends to avoid specifying which types of monsters you cannot summon/have on the field but rather list which monsters you can have. In that case I would have said "if this card is in the GY and you only control monsters with a level, ... ". The part about banishing a card from the hand should definitely be removed otherwise I prefer it to remain banned. 5) For Arise-Hearth I like the idea of keeping track of how many materials it has but I think some good, healthy playtesting is needed before finding the right number of materials. 6) Neptune I agree but to be safe I would make sure that the opponent cannot receive damage (in battle or by effect) for the rest of the turn in general.
I agree to your changes,except for Norden and Level eater.Norden just needs hard once per turn on summon,and for Level eater I'll put hard twice per turn.Btw can you make more of this erratas?Verte anaconda,Dragoon etc?
The Errata of Halq is not that good I would just change it to " Special summon 1 Crystion monster from your hand or deck " and for the second effect it should say " you can special summon 1 tuner synchro monster from your extra deck but you cannot activate it's effects until the end of this turn.
I don't like erratas, they ruin the old cards for alternative formats and most of the time don't make them playable. The only ones acceptable are adding a once per turn clause that obviously should have been there for the beginning to fix a badly designed card, yours are extremely well thought out
Erratas suck. Any errata that change the way the card was originally suppose to work is instantly disliked by me. That’s why I’m always a proponent of retrains.
I would just have given Halq a synchro lock on both effects. But I like the need to use arrows, should be more standard for links. For Norden, I'd rather send materials to GY instead of banish to summon it. Maxx "C" fix is called Multchummy Purulia. Level Eater wasn't a problem before Links and is a Synchro tool, so Synchro lock is the simpler solution. Kash fix is cool tbh. Neptune could just copy the Level to further proof it further (also restrict it to copying monsters with a Level)
I would still main 3 of that Maxx C, there's still a high ammount of cards that special summon by effect, just in this format we got one for one, Poplar, Ash and Oak, Flamberge, Orginal, Promethean, Chundra, Kaimen, Lo, Trias, every Voiceless ritual and Albaz Fusion. The card is going to be pot of greed most of the time.
Halq - Honestly, is it wrong to just make it require 1 or 2 Krystron monsters for it's summoning. So it can keep it's broken effects but not make it generic. Norden- never thought on it really Maxx C - Honestly any restriction makes it better. Level eater - It's interesting. The banish a card might be overkill but it's interesting. Arise Heart- Best one on the list. I like it. Neptune - Hmmm this one might be overkill and very targeted to the Lyrilusc strategy. Making it last till the end of the turn makes it feel like a bad card. Maybe just leave it's effect intact but let it only use main deck monsters. Restrict it from using Extra deck monsters. Let people still make up strong strategies but making them work harder by searching their deck.
After activating maxx c you can only activate 2 cards or effects and during the end phase you must shuffle cards into your deck equal to the number you drew from maxx Cs effect
@@javelinmaster2 how about both, the traditional materials will be my opinion. Like chaos angel, it has another summoning alternative. U can also synchro summon this card with by using 1 tuner and 1 or more non- tuner if fleur synchron is on the field.
Make Maxx c so you can only use it on an empty board, if the card resolves you can not activate any cards from your hand. This will stop people from making a board and dropping it on turn 2, also would stop people from drawing more handtraps. Yes they will be playing uninterrupted but you will have plenty of cards to brute force your way through
Maxx C errata is cool but still too busted. Modern yugioh literally always specials by card effect so you still gonna go like +5 for a lot of decks. In snake-eye alone you can draw up to 5 cards with Maxx C which is too much.
maxx c power comes when u are 1st and vomit all ur deck then shotgun maxx c , it needs to have the effect to be activated if you control no cards thats it we fixed the card
You lowkey buffed Maxx C by forcing opponents to play it properly instead of shotgunning it into Set 5 pass. This new Maxx C is still broken to shit, it just means I draw 10 off Snake-Eyes combo instead of drawing 15 That aside, though, I like a lot of the changes. Halq's errata was perfect to me and I'm cool with that, especially for its utility in Crystron since they do good when remaining on board
You miss something important from "C" archetype. Most "C" cards are anti extra deck card. So, removing the ability to counter Extra Deck monster is not good. Beside, Extra Deck is a huge advantage in modern YGO, because this mechanic has consistency. This is unfair if we reduce the counter for it. I feel most players don't understand how "broken" the extra deck itself. . Halq, summon in link arrow and cannot be used as Link material. This is enough.
with the changes you done to halq i can still do the same combo of bouncing ash to my hand go into loucast then psy-frame and now i can do that all with one card in sudri and as much as id like it back two hand rips and a ash is not fair norden cant come back fiendsmith is coming that be a 1 card combo lol skipped maxx c we dont speak of that thing and they just brought out a new maxx c that will get banned lol just make eater white only lol
@@alexanderbatterbee8369it literally changes so much??? you actually need resources to have the macro cosmos effect and gives other decks chances to out it without needing the specific card
@@mateofontanez5177 they make it with 3 mats 98 percent of the time and it gets more. And the banish effect replaces what it lost. It changes nothing lol
I think for maxx c it should be: During your opponent's Main Phase 1, if you control no cards (Quick Effect): You can send this card from your hand to your GY; this turn each time your opponent Special Summons a monster by card effect, draw 1 card. You can only activate this effect once per turn.
@@dustinvance243 changes that it cant be used as another layer of BS to a combo end board, so if you put things on board, you cant go "oh btw, max C, have fun with that"
@@inigorafaelr.bernales4786 it changes nothing because it's still an instant win button whenever its used. There's no fixing that darn roach. It should just stay banned. And the ocg should ban it to.
@@inigorafaelr.bernales4786 it changes nothing because it's still an instant win whenever it would be used. All he really did was make it so only one person gets to use it. That makes it even less fair because now you can't get any advantage when the going second guy starts comboing and breaking your board with all the cards they just got until after your board is wiped and that's assuming you're still in mp 1. There's no fixing Maxx C. The card should just be banned and it should stay that way.
@@dustinvance243 how about I add this: During your opponent's Main Phase 1, if you control no cards and your opponent Special Summons a monster by a card or effect (Quick Effect): You can send this card from your hand to your GY; each time your opponent Special Summons a monster by a card effect, except from the hand or GY, draw 1 card, also you cannot activate Traps and/or monster effects from the hand until end of your next turn. You can only use this effect once per turn.
Norden was actually summoned "properly" at one point.........by Zoodiac. When Zoodiac was still dominating the meta, they incorporated Fusion Substitute into their combos and used it to fuse two of their Xyz into Norden to extend their plays.
I like the idea of fixing ariseheart. Didn’t know if it would be possible. So many banned cards could honestly be unbanned by simply restricting it to its own archetype instead of being too generic. Looking at link monsters mostly.
Lock you into synchro summons, oh look i just fixed halq and level eater.
I still hate them for the Chaos Dragon errata. Wished they just left it alone instead of making a joke out of this iconic card.
If they didn't errata Chaos Emperor Dragon, then it would of never gotten unbanned. As it's original effect is still way to strong even for modern Yu-Gi-Oh. I mean sending both players into top deck mode whenever you want upon it's summon is busted AF
@@marcusking332 I'm aware of that. But rather keep it banned than making a joke out of it that won't see any play anyway, right?
Agree i get it getting a once per turn for it burn effect but making it be the only effect that turn make a card that was supposed to be a rival to BLS envy of chaos and turned it into a gimmicky otk deck hurts. @@makenaiyomi1083
@@makenaiyomi1083 i do agree, but at the same time. The errata CED got was the only errata it could of gotten, which would of allowed it to get unbanned.
if the mecha phantom beast link summon conditions were 3 mecha phantom beast monsters then it wouldnt be on the banlist to begin with
Yeah but it would be horrible in it's own deck because the deck cant summon 3 monsters
2+ "Mecha Phantom Beast", except Tokens
That's the point
Crystrons are a deck that Synchro Summons During Main or Battle Phase....So taking that off Halq makes him unusable in his own deck
Should have made half require crystron tuners
I think the fact that there are so many link2s that special something but almost never have to summon to their zone is just criminal. Konami simply decided that the link arrows dont matter in these cases.
This is a very cool format for a series of videos wow. Great Stuff
Love this idea. Also do a video of making weak effects stronger
This series is so interesting plz do more
Grinder Golem.
Just add this: if summoned this way, this card cannot declare an attack, can only be destroyed by battle and cannot leave the field by any other way until your opponents next end phase.
This makes it so that GG can't be bounced by link effects and still can be used effectively only once.
Halq should keep the option to actívate during your opponent’s Battle Phase. It’s part of the effects the Crystron Tuners have in common.
i like this background more, less flashy and looks more professional
One simple Errata for ED cards is to either tighten their material requirements. Other options are to have clause where they can only use ONE out of 2-3 effects per turn, so there's actual decision making involved rather than just activate activate activate or lock your special summon for the TURN not for the rest of the turn, to a specific type or attribute, so you lose access to other powerful cards making your board still strong just not overpowered where the opponent cannot play at all.
Pretty much what makes these cards broken is how generic they are. Like how Spright Elf is busted because he works outside of spright
Yeah make Halq require a Crystron monster. Cool buff to Crystron but GL using it in other decks.
While other cards are just broken due to their effects being repeatable like Plushfire.....
WHO IS GETTING ERRATAD FOR THE NEW PERFORMAGE SUPPORT :)
If Norden had the reatriction that you banished materials for the summon, it wouldn't work in its own archetype. The goal was to summon azathoth with synchro, fusion, and xyz monsters but banishing the materials would be counterintuitive. By just having one of required materials be a monster you control would be enough with super poly.
1. For crystron i would make it state monsters that share the same name as the tuner can't use their effects the turn that it is summoned and that they can't be used for tribute or the summon of extra deck monsters other than synchros.
2. Norden i think needs the simple change of its materials to be (1 synchro/xyz) + ( one monster special summoned from the extra deck). This way it is still a good super poly target with more options but decks that recycle their monsters or only need 1 extra deck monster on field like branded, snake eyes, and tenpai can easily play around it.
You should do more of these!
If we're going to errata cards to make broken banned cards worse, then I will only accept this if you errata garbage cards that should've been good to be better... If you are allowed to errata halq to be worse, then it's only fair to errata bujinki to be better... Make it so it will summon a monster with the same level from your graveyard and your hand *OR DECK* (not just only your hand, but can also summon from the deck). It needs so much set up and luck of the draw that it's trash.
Excellent videos, do Diablosis, Isolde, Baronne, Savage, Broadbull and Plushfire next!
I want to see Union Carrier come back for ABC. Changing its materials to require 2 light machine union monsters would make it less accessible to decks that want to abuse it, and ABC can still have access to it to make Cyber Dragon Infinity.
2 monsters with the same Type or Attribute, *Including an Union monster*.
I like the max c change but probably change it to once per duel to limit people to running only one maybe 2
I appreciate the effort you put into the video but I would say without a doubt that many of the changes you would make to the cards you listed are the least elegant and clean solutions I have ever heard.
Often the effects change functioning for no real reason:
1) I don't get Halq asking for a lv3 or lower tuner "to not be splashed in certain decks", you didn't give any concrete examples of these decks (I guess you wanted to prevent Mathmech from using it?). The problem was never that it could use lv4 tuners.
2) Elder Entity Norden's second proposed errata makes it a contact fusion for no real reason, and completely changes how the card works. But I agree that you should have to use your monsters (requiring at least one to be yours is already fine in my opinion).
3) Before fixing maxx C I would see what Konami is cooking with the Multchummy archetype, but if you really want to give an errata now to Maxx C you must necessarily add "You have to control no cards" to be able to activate it.
4) As you said a HOPT on level eater would fix the card in an elegant way but if you want to keep the old functioning and summon it several times in monarch/synchro deck then losing a card in hand would make it complete packfiller garbage as well as not maintaining what the card did.
Then the fact that the card in your errata now lists "Link monsters" in the text is very strange and Konami tends to avoid specifying which types of monsters you cannot summon/have on the field but rather list which monsters you can have. In that case I would have said "if this card is in the GY and you only control monsters with a level, ... ".
The part about banishing a card from the hand should definitely be removed otherwise I prefer it to remain banned.
5) For Arise-Hearth I like the idea of keeping track of how many materials it has but I think some good, healthy playtesting is needed before finding the right number of materials.
6) Neptune I agree but to be safe I would make sure that the opponent cannot receive damage (in battle or by effect) for the rest of the turn in general.
I agree to your changes,except for Norden and Level eater.Norden just needs hard once per turn on summon,and for Level eater I'll put hard twice per turn.Btw can you make more of this erratas?Verte anaconda,Dragoon etc?
The Errata of Halq is not that good I would just change it to " Special summon 1 Crystion monster from your hand or deck " and for the second effect it should say " you can special summon 1 tuner synchro monster from your extra deck but you cannot activate it's effects until the end of this turn.
That's too light it has to be like 2 crystion monsters to summon it well be seeing snake eyes halq if not so no
@@Smootyinc I agree on the summon requirement
Na he did good with that one the other ones was bad
I don't like erratas, they ruin the old cards for alternative formats and most of the time don't make them playable. The only ones acceptable are adding a once per turn clause that obviously should have been there for the beginning to fix a badly designed card, yours are extremely well thought out
Erratas suck. Any errata that change the way the card was originally suppose to work is instantly disliked by me.
That’s why I’m always a proponent of retrains.
Dude the Kash fix is amazing and I would love to be able to play Kashtira again, even if it's like this. Well done!
I would just have given Halq a synchro lock on both effects. But I like the need to use arrows, should be more standard for links.
For Norden, I'd rather send materials to GY instead of banish to summon it.
Maxx "C" fix is called Multchummy Purulia.
Level Eater wasn't a problem before Links and is a Synchro tool, so Synchro lock is the simpler solution.
Kash fix is cool tbh.
Neptune could just copy the Level to further proof it further (also restrict it to copying monsters with a Level)
I would still main 3 of that Maxx C, there's still a high ammount of cards that special summon by effect, just in this format we got one for one, Poplar, Ash and Oak, Flamberge, Orginal, Promethean, Chundra, Kaimen, Lo, Trias, every Voiceless ritual and Albaz Fusion. The card is going to be pot of greed most of the time.
Halq - Honestly, is it wrong to just make it require 1 or 2 Krystron monsters for it's summoning. So it can keep it's broken effects but not make it generic.
Norden- never thought on it really
Maxx C - Honestly any restriction makes it better.
Level eater - It's interesting. The banish a card might be overkill but it's interesting.
Arise Heart- Best one on the list. I like it.
Neptune - Hmmm this one might be overkill and very targeted to the Lyrilusc strategy. Making it last till the end of the turn makes it feel like a bad card. Maybe just leave it's effect intact but let it only use main deck monsters. Restrict it from using Extra deck monsters. Let people still make up strong strategies but making them work harder by searching their deck.
No its not wrong for Halq for it’s material require crytron monster that would be the right choice instead of making it generic to summon
level eater should just be for synchro summons. miss that card.
You turned The Tyrant Neptune in Supreme King Frahon Starving Venom but with the burn damage negation instead of piercing
After activating maxx c you can only activate 2 cards or effects and during the end phase you must shuffle cards into your deck equal to the number you drew from maxx Cs effect
Would stop people using it on their own turns and also stop people who already have a full board set up activating maxx c on top of it
U don't need to fix baronne eff, just fix it's summoning materials, 1 synchro tuner + non tuner synchro mons
Or just make it so that it can only be brought out by the fleur synchrons.
@@javelinmaster2 how about both, the traditional materials will be my opinion. Like chaos angel, it has another summoning alternative. U can also synchro summon this card with by using 1 tuner and 1 or more non- tuner if fleur synchron is on the field.
You should leave crystron to have the same effect as it's archetype. Locks you into machines fl
Don’t think changes to arise-heart would matter. It’s mainly the Main Deck monsters that caused the issue imo.
Make Maxx c so you can only use it on an empty board, if the card resolves you can not activate any cards from your hand.
This will stop people from making a board and dropping it on turn 2, also would stop people from drawing more handtraps.
Yes they will be playing uninterrupted but you will have plenty of cards to brute force your way through
Those changes are awesome Matt!
I would like to have Norden as a superpoly target tho 😅
Maxx C errata is cool but still too busted. Modern yugioh literally always specials by card effect so you still gonna go like +5 for a lot of decks. In snake-eye alone you can draw up to 5 cards with Maxx C which is too much.
I'm liking the Level Eater errata you've shown. Synchron need their bug back please. Bystials exist.
Ariseheart would still be broken, Kashtira would just make it with 3 monsters and chill
Union Carrier can only equip Union monsters
maxx c power comes when u are 1st and vomit all ur deck then shotgun maxx c , it needs to have the effect to be activated if you control no cards thats it we fixed the card
Let the era of erata begin!!!
Can your next video include Chaos Ruler and Spright Elf?
Please make Curious playable so Lightsworn players can cope
You lowkey buffed Maxx C by forcing opponents to play it properly instead of shotgunning it into Set 5 pass. This new Maxx C is still broken to shit, it just means I draw 10 off Snake-Eyes combo instead of drawing 15
That aside, though, I like a lot of the changes. Halq's errata was perfect to me and I'm cool with that, especially for its utility in Crystron since they do good when remaining on board
Bring back my king Arise Heart😭😩
Haha! Imagine if Konami brings back to Masterduel not the TCG 😂😂
If Halqifibrax said " 2 crystron monsters " literally nobody would've played it back in the day
You miss something important from "C" archetype. Most "C" cards are anti extra deck card. So, removing the ability to counter Extra Deck monster is not good. Beside, Extra Deck is a huge advantage in modern YGO, because this mechanic has consistency. This is unfair if we reduce the counter for it. I feel most players don't understand how "broken" the extra deck itself.
.
Halq, summon in link arrow and cannot be used as Link material. This is enough.
I.dont want them to fix ban cards just make new ones and learn what makes them ban. Then add a bunch more combo facilitating cards to the list.
with the changes you done to halq i can still do the same combo of bouncing ash to my hand go into loucast then psy-frame and now i can do that all with one card in sudri and as much as id like it back two hand rips and a ash is not fair
norden cant come back fiendsmith is coming that be a 1 card combo lol
skipped maxx c we dont speak of that thing and they just brought out a new maxx c that will get banned lol
just make eater white only lol
Woah Matt room reveal
free my homie Elf man 😓
Just have halq have a crystron lock for the turn
The errata of Ariseheart is nice ngl
It literally doesn't change anything lmao
It's still gonna do what got it banned in the first place lmao
@@alexanderbatterbee8369it literally changes so much??? you actually need resources to have the macro cosmos effect and gives other decks chances to out it without needing the specific card
@@mateofontanez5177 they make it with 3 mats 98 percent of the time and it gets more. And the banish effect replaces what it lost. It changes nothing lol
@@alexanderbatterbee8369 yeah which exactly why he said it would only have 4 mats max did you not watch the video??
Do you think kitkallos need errata? I mean, keep banning those ishizu millers😢
I think tearlament kashtira and other cards like field spell needs to be hit like master duel. for it to happen
Free merrli.
@@Camelotsmoon they made the wrong monster level 2, too much synergy with spright.
Unban simorgh
I think for maxx c it should be: During your opponent's Main Phase 1, if you control no cards (Quick Effect): You can send this card from your hand to your GY; this turn each time your opponent Special Summons a monster by card effect, draw 1 card. You can only activate this effect once per turn.
That changes literally nothing.
@@dustinvance243 changes that it cant be used as another layer of BS to a combo end board, so if you put things on board, you cant go "oh btw, max C, have fun with that"
@@inigorafaelr.bernales4786 it changes nothing because it's still an instant win button whenever its used. There's no fixing that darn roach. It should just stay banned. And the ocg should ban it to.
@@inigorafaelr.bernales4786 it changes nothing because it's still an instant win whenever it would be used. All he really did was make it so only one person gets to use it. That makes it even less fair because now you can't get any advantage when the going second guy starts comboing and breaking your board with all the cards they just got until after your board is wiped and that's assuming you're still in mp 1. There's no fixing Maxx C. The card should just be banned and it should stay that way.
@@dustinvance243 how about I add this: During your opponent's Main Phase 1, if you control no cards and your opponent Special Summons a monster by a card or effect (Quick Effect): You can send this card from your hand to your GY; each time your opponent Special Summons a monster by a card effect, except from the hand or GY, draw 1 card, also you cannot activate Traps and/or monster effects from the hand until end of your next turn. You can only use this effect once per turn.
U did bad after the first one i ca. Do better than this
Don’t think changes to arise-heart would matter. It’s mainly the Main Deck monsters that caused the issue imo.