Moved two lanes in one manoeuvre and this clip shows why that is a bad idea. If she treated each lane change separately the collision would most likely have been avoided Unfortunately I doubt she has learned her lesson and will consider herself unlucky another vehicle was there as the previous 200 times has been absolutely fine 🤷🏻♂️
Agree - but the cammer could have done more to avoid a collision, such as understanding that he's in the blind spot, and either pushing ahead or dropping back. He'd already done a bunch of hard work by moving over to make space for the joining traffic.
@@Gorf1234 why the mad rush to get to lane two..as soon as people join the main carriage way .. same on motorways .. from slip road to middle /outside lane .. she should have checked before changing lanes ..
Hilarious. US channels would feature 'barrel rolls', end-over-ends, helicopter footage of cop chases... and we have a rogue trolley at Morrison's 😂. Give me UK dashcam any day!
@@Chris-fy8rk Indeed he was in the correct lane. But being right isn't really of higher value than not crashing. He's still a terrible driver due to this easily avoidable accident. Literally go round roundabouts in a staggered formation and you can't crash.
#13 classic example of an entitled motorist looking down their nose at cyclists. Too busy trying to overtake them and not paying attention to what's actually happening in the road. He gave the driver plenty of notice that he was planning to take that turn, no different to another car or larger vehicle taking the same turn. Also the typical "Good job I wasn't speeding" line proves the driver thinks the cyclist's somehow expected to defer to him on the road and doesn't think he's responsible for his own actions.
Yes, the auto-back-pat for not speeding got me too. I feel confident that the limit on that road will be 30mph within a few years - it would be already, where I live.
@@zbf5h89ftb I'd love to see this fictional second clip you've watched. Also whether or not the driver cycles is irrelevant. They still drive in an arrogant and entitled manner. I'd suggest you know nothing at all.
@@derekheeps1244 I am no fan of cyclist but he's right, she is in the wrong. If it was a car indicating right and she overtook it, who's fault do you thing the ensuing accident would have been? Same deal, the cyclist were in front of her, he looked over his should 1st and indicated he was turning, she was wrong to try an go past them when it wasn't safe to do so.
@@Chris-fy8rk its not really a problem, when it says the number in the bottom right corner, Personally i find it easier to look for the # number then time.
The cyclist started his manoeuvre late and without looking behind him before turning. If he'd been in the middle of the road the car could have continued.
@waltersobchak1719 the cyclist checked his blind spot before indicating and moving over. The driver ignored that blind spot check and started to manouvre to overtake. Who knows if they were indicating or not. Either way, stupid place to try and overtake and the cyclist would never have seen them. The only thing the cyclist did wrong was not be in the middle of the road coming up to the junction. But then the cammer would have complained about that instead as they tried to overtake them.
Unfortunately in instances like this the police may wish to see a dangerous driving charge but the cps would agree to a lower charge as no one was killed or seriously injured to ensure a conviction. I agree it was dangerous, not careless. The driver knew exactly what he was doing.
13 was the driver's error. Yes, he was holding back to start with, which showed considerate driving to the cyclists. But the driver fails to anticipate that the cyclist might want to turn off. Although it's frustrating, you have to really hang back with cyclists, even if you go down to second gear. The alternative is unthinkable.
No - it was entirely the cyclists in the wrong - no advanced planning whatsoever , no getting on course in a timely manner , no rear observation in a timely manner , just a last moment shoulder check then a hasty signal which does not give any time for reaction and a swerve across the entire width of the road with no regard for anyone else - dangerous and incompetent cycling . having left their move too late they both should have waited in the lay-by to the left .
@@derekheeps1244 2 Highway codes that apply here : "DO NOT overtake if there is any doubt, or where you cannot see far enough ahead to be sure it is safe. For example, when you are approaching a corner or bend" and "DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road." There is clearly a bend, even if it's not a sharp one, followed by a junction. It was clearly unsafe to overtake. Car's fault 100%
#13 he didn’t indicate and pull out in front of you. He was in front of you, he looked behind and then indicated. Poor observation from you to not see it
This clip and some of the comments moaning about the driver are what make so many people hate cyclists. And yes I do sometimes cycle as well as drive, but I don't just stick my hand out then move across when a car is about to pass me, that would be stupid.
13. What a fuss over nothing. You're going under the speed limit (good stuff) and the cyclist is clearly looking behind him before indicating and before moving out. Total non event
My thoughts exactly. If the cammer was upset by this it says a lot about their lack of awareness and looking ahead. The cyclist is seen looking over their shoulder and putting their arm out. The only person who did anything wrong was the car by not paying better attention.
As a cyclist, I would always give a driver plenty of notice before a right turn. Between 5 - 10 seconds and I move out into the road, way before the junction. They are going much faster then me and I will come out the worse in accident. Just because it isn't wrong, doesn't mean he was in the right to make a sudden turn. A car driver isn't a mind reader and to trust a stranger to break swiftly on a sudden manuver is just asking for trouble.
What are you talking about? It’s a clip. It’s valid, in that the vast majority of clips on these channels show daily events that I could capture on the way to work. The rarity is to find that one or two clips that you don’t often see. This clip. Any action by a road user that causes another vehicle to take evasive action, including applying brakes is a total no no in the Highway Code. The clip, albeit very dull, still highlights issues to various viewers especially learners. The cyclist changing direction without a sufficient indication of its move and takes action anyhow is incorrect. And the text is wrong, as the lady doesn’t have to follow at all - ride your own safe journey. *Mores the question, what’s the car doing overtaking at a junction.* Two wrongs don’t make … etc.
#2 I live about five minutes from Wichelstowe, and coming from the right turn, there is a mini roundabout, the amount of cars that turn right (from this clip), get to the next mini roundabout and then decide to indicate right as they’ve pretty much travelled all the way around the roundabout is mind boggling. The school kids are a lot more cautious now since this incident if you wanted to see any positivity from such a dreadful thing.
This is what worries me, I've had 2 drivers prosecuted through Operation Snap - rather than sending it to social media get it over to the police for prosecution. They are VERY good, in both cases I've had an email back within 24 hours saying they intend to prosecute.
@@james-5560 I reported a Rang for mounting the kerb. That was in South Yorkshire. The police confirmed to me that the driver had been sent on a "diversionary course."
5:43 Lead cyclist did a blatant shoulder check, which should have been a MASSIVE clue about their intentions. YOU were the one who misread it and attempted an overtake when you shouldn't have.
@waltersobchak1719 no he wasn't. A shoulder check when a junction is coming up implies that the cyclist is about to use that junction. Car driver completely missed the clue. You know that, don't make it out as something else.
@waltersobchak1719 The cyclist did exactly what he was supposed to do, look over shoulder, indicate and merge. I'm a cyclist myself and I've had many drivers argue and calling me names, I've told them all to learn to drive. In one occasion a police officer seen the driver cutting me off and fined him for road raging.
@waltersobchak1719 alright, if you say so. You carry on overtaking cyclists at junctions etc when they look over their shoulders and give hand signals. I won’t argue. It’ll be on you. 👍
@3.10 A17 / A16 Sutterton roundabout always problems with A17 eastbound traffic. Drivers who either try and get 1 or 2 vehicles in front by going in the wrong lane despite ample road and traffic signs or just don't look take notice of them.
4:47 /#10 Wtaf, indeed. Cammer DW responds to a (granted, dangerous) emerge in front of him at some speed with neither emergency braking nor horn, but steering. Even if this were necessary, which is doubtful, no way was it necessary to spin it into an attempted overtake with an oncoming car already in view.
What we really need is a good way to give an apology, everyone makes mistakes. If you both met each other in a door, you'd say sorry. The incident at 2:55, whilst it should not have happened, did happen, and it was at least a sorry.
hahah i wouldn't be so proud of that .. just wait till you see the Audi/Merc/BMW/VW clips ... mainly Audi's .. their owners really are a sight to behold .. stay tuned :)
@@Chris-fy8rk You use the marked lane with the big white writing in the lane and the giant layout diagram. If you can't do that then you have to ask yourself if you should really be on the road.
@james-5560 What the fuck are you going on about? Im not the driver dickhead. I drive this roundabout daily in my truck and if it were daytime then.you would see on the sign that the Left lane for the A17 is the exit with the FUEL STATION Its a shit designed roundabout now do one if you cant work out that i was informing this person who made the comment
Cam truck was in the correct, he was in the lane for the A17 and took the a17 exit (3rd exit). right lane was for the A16(S) only which was the 4th exit.
People keep telling me it's a courtesy to move over to lane 2 to allow merging traffic in, However the amount of videos I see, where someone does this and is then repaid by having that same pleb sideswipe them, I'd rather just stay in lane 1 and not let them in.
If you're talking about 0:47 (#3), just don't be an idiot like the cammer. Very clearly just sitting in that person's blindspot. No excuse for the Peugeot driver to not just look properly, but as drivers we need to be aware of whether or not we've been seen, and do something about it instead of letting a collision happen. That cammer should have sped up, slowed down, or sounded their horn, instead of just sitting their like a lobotomised lemming.
The trouble is in lane 2, you're in their blind spot. If you adjust accordingly and drive defensively, these sort of accidents can be avoided, but most drivers just sit there and go, 'well, I was in the right .. I'm not going to adjust my speed', etc.
It's the responsibility of the merging vehicle to find a gap. I don't care who thinks it's "polite" to move over, I'll sit where I am, not overtaking therefore predictably in lane 1, being extra predictable on cruise at between 67 and 70. If someone can't find a gap around that to merge safely then that's entirely their failing, not mine. I would and do expect the same when I join.
@@burgersnchips I mean, yeah, but it's also not difficult to do. You often don't need to move over and sometimes you can't help it, but saying you won't move over and it's solely the emerging vehicles problem is poor, even if it's not actually illegal. There are more reasons to move over beyond it just being nice. Firstly, when traffic is heavy, cooperative driving in general means better traffic flow. That means queues are reduced, resulting in less fuel being wasted and shorter journey times. Those things are good for the environment and good for the economy. It's something that is less evident in one instance but if everyone was driving cooperatively then this tiny effect adds up. Additionally, safety is increased if you move over. Ensuring someone isn't forced to stop, or significantly slow down, on a slip road means the risk of rear end collision on the slip road is reduced for them, and there is also less danger if they are not trying to accelerate onto a carriageway from a stopped position. The danger to you is also reduced as by positioning further over you have more time to react to what they do. If you are directly alongside them, they could be the sort of person to just force themselves out anyway, risking a collision. In that kind of situation you may not be culpable but you could also be dead. Or some innocent motorcyclist could be dead because they just happened to be nearby when it happens. Unlikely scenarios but lots of the things you do with driving are about ensuring the unlikely doesn't happen. When traffic is busy it may not be possible to find a gap without people moving over to lane 2 to make space. Think about what happens if there are lorries or other slow accelerating vehicles trying to emerge. And if everyone took your attitude and just stayed in lane 1, slip roads would be constantly backed up as no one would be able to emerge for a couple hours at busy times. Again, there are plenty of times when it is better to stay in your lane and not move out, and if traffic is light or the relative speeds of vehicles is right it isn't necessary. And yes, regardless of everything I've said, the emerging vehicle still has the final responsibility to ensure a safe emerge, I don't dispute that. But what exactly does refusing to move over accomplish? In what way is it the correct thing to do?
@@goodguykonrad3701Blind spot is a bogus excuse used by crap drivers to justify their bad driving. If you're not sure, you hold off until you are sure you are clear to merge.
No 3 Surely, if you are entering a motorway or dual carriageway, you must give priority to traffic already on the main road. To many drivers don't know how to merge in to traffic. .any believe giving a right signal give them the right to join even if someone is alongside. You can't expect drivers to move to the right to let you on. Ther may be another vehicle to the right preventing it. Read the Highway Code. Its all there.
All true. But the cammer didn't do very well there either. The barrier was obstructing the merging cars view, and then by changing lanes they kept themselves in the merging cars blind spot longer. Not an excuse for the merging car not to look, but the cammer almost perfectly minimised opportunities for the merging car to spot them. Spotting a potential conflict with merging traffic on the motorway is one of the easiest bits of defensive driving to pick up. the traffic is going in the same direction, so you have lots of time. And there is a strong visual cue, the other car will be getting larger but not moving relative to the frame of reference of your dash.
Your spot on target, merging onto the motorway/carriageway is coming off the minor road, when its same to do so to pull out, if theres a vehicle there slow down until a safe gap so very much spot on, drives a 2020 vehicle and thinks they own the road plus can see he/she never did a blind spot check in the first place, if she'd checked there mirrors they would not of pulled out
Thats why checking mirrors is always important. The RR driver should have seen the car flying up from behind as the road narrows and would have been so much easier all round to just let them pass, let them get on their way and maintain a safe distance. Too many drivers take it personally when someone gets in front. What does it matter if they get ahead ? They aren’t going to the same destination, its not a race. It actually makes no sense whatsoever why this irritates some people. No logic to it whatsoever.
Just an FYI 3:10 The cam truck is actually using the correct lane here even tho it doesnt appear to be. The exit he took with the fuel station is the A17 which is used by the Left lane Absolute crap design of a roundabout
4:26 Yeah. Theres the ones who don't bother putting the trolleys away at all. Then there's the ones who half-heartedly chuck them vaguely at the trolley bay. Just awesome people. Love em.
Wow not only stupid enough to not look in their mirrors before pulling out onto a motorway, but then to stop in a live lane. I hope this was reported to the police, they're too dangerours, that is 2 counts of driving without due care right there which should be a ban.
2:50 if your stopping distance coming to a roundabout relies on the 5m length of a single car, then you are doing something wrong to start. if you are actually fully loaded at 44 tonne, even if there were no cars ahead, the speed and seemingly minimal steady braking is wild
The main thing is, the 2 guys on the merc walked aimlessly down the side of the white line without looking to see if a truck was close thus wet close to being killed and the motorway being shut and sad messages pouring in saying what lovely lads they were,,,, anyway,
oh yeah always the same shite.. " Our Dwayne was such a blessing , lovely happy go lucky lad who had a heart of gold and will be sadly missed " .. yeah but what you don't know that Dwayne regularly kicked the shit out of people during his dodgy dealing lifestyle that nobody but a select few knew about
No he signalled as the car was already starting to over take. Personally i feel like bicycles should have indicators on them and not just relay on hand signals.
The driver should have slowed as soon as he saw the right turn signal by the cyclist. The cyclist however should be positioned nearer the middle of the road if he intends to turn right.
0:57 Never ever tell them you have a dashcam, let them lie to the insurance and be done extra for fraud attempt. Of all the times I have been hit and it's been a few, every single one of them denied any wrongdoing. E v e r y single one of them.
13# maybe don’t overtake at a junction and complain when someone makes a turn. I like it don’t that if it was a car slowing down? No cause you would think it’s turning. Never over take coming To a junction with cyclists especially if they are looking over their shoulder common sense.
#13 cyclist did have bad road positioning , but would you have overtaken a car that was signalling to turn right? A shame that schools don't appear to do cycling proficiency courses anymore ...... it'd save a lot of grief on the roads
They do... it's called Bikeability. It's been nationwide since 2007 and 100,000s of 9-11 years olds have completed courses. I think over 4 million by now...
Clip one was a blowout, OSF, low profile, likely the only reason they survived at that speed was because it was low profile and the difference in tire height was minimal. 6:11 Ouch... Trade plates, brand new cars, first tank of fuel... someone is for the high jump over that one I imagine.
#3. well done for actually using the using the indicator but using the indicator doesn't give you the right to; l it merely tells other road users your intentions of which should be safe before you actually carry out your intentions. never tell them you have a dash cam. keep that surprise for their insurers. and don't waste your time by arguing who is at fault. that isnt you job. that's what you pay your insurer for. understand this; you are not going to be making the final decision on who is at fault, the insurers will. exchange your details and then be on your way if you can.
I have never heard or read anyone saying that. The none-too-radical "thing these days" is the idea that really good road use is about not just about following rules, but anticipating, defusing and making non-events of the errors of others.
@@ChrisBrown-px1oy Exactly. Merging on to a motorway is one of my big gripes. How can so many people be getting it so badly wrong? I’ve seen a few dashcam clips of people pulling onto lane 1 of the motorway from the hard shoulder as if they were pulling out to go to the shops. The old saying: they’ve never had an accident but seen hundreds.
#2 absolutely disgusting. Which victim got a measly £34? And it's about time people started losing their licences for blowing red lights. Too much revenue generating and not enough keeping people safe.
Victim impact surcharge doesn’t actually go to the victim involved, it goes to a grant fund Police and Crime Commissioners, who commission local support services for victims. It is also used to help victims of the most serious cases of crimes I can’t write here or this comment will be blocked.
The victim didn’t get anything; most likely just carried on with their life, not knowing that the driver, who could have easily killed them, was penalised. The victim surcharge does not go to the victim of the incident, but is pooled and distributed through the Victim and Witness General Fund.
1:07 If someone can't be honest enough to admit their mistake then I can't be honest enough to tell them I have a dashcam. Just let them go away thinking they are gonna knock my insurance, then when their insurance contacts mine, I would send over the footage. Cos if they lie to me, and I was there, they won't think twice about lying to their insurance. Lying on an insurance claim if fraud.
@@stevennazar2102 Yes it was not right what white car did but Highway code 168 Being overtaken. If a driver is trying to overtake you, maintain a steady course and speed, slowing down if necessary to let the vehicle pass. Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass. Speeding up or driving unpredictably while someone is overtaking you is dangerous. Drop back to maintain a two-second gap if someone overtakes and pulls into the gap in front of you.
Put the time (3:10) rather then #8 then it can be clicked on to go straight to the clip. And you are wrong. Cam truck was in the left lane for the A17 which IS the exit he took with then fuel station. Crap designed Roundabout tbf
You're completely wrong. left lane was marked and signed posted for the A16(N) 2nd exit and A17 3rd exit. right lane was for the A16(S) only 4th exit. 1st exit was just a minor road so wasn't explicitly mentioned. you can check it yourself on google maps if you want, its here 52°53'23.8"N 0°05'03.3"W. cam truck was coming on the A17 from the west.
Earlier responses have pointed out that the vehicle was in the correctly marked lane but HGVs often need to use outer lanes of roundabouts regardless of marking so they can get round.
send vids to police and they should send them to insurance companies so they then can put there premiums up. only way for the stupid and arrogant drivers
It is past time deliberate dangerous driving carried a charge of attempted murder. Fifteen years in prison may deter some of the criminals or get them off the roads.
No later he was bundled into the back of a Ford Transit .. blind folded .. got kneecapped so he couldn't run away ... taken to an old warehouse ..where he was strapped to a chair ... where alongside him where various hammers, drills , knives, belts and other stuff .. afterwards he was driven blindfolded down the M62 to a random location .. dropped off and said Transit drove away .... At least he won't be on the road for quite some time .. given that he has to crawl to get help and he won't be in a fit state to do anything for a long long time . I presume you wanted something like that as punishment for the 45yr old .. did you ?? not that it has anything to do with YOU what the Courts decided ..
#3 "she said she was indicating"... And she thinks that gives her the right to just move over? She didn't shoulder check. Derrrr
Moved two lanes in one manoeuvre and this clip shows why that is a bad idea. If she treated each lane change separately the collision would most likely have been avoided
Unfortunately I doubt she has learned her lesson and will consider herself unlucky another vehicle was there as the previous 200 times has been absolutely fine 🤷🏻♂️
Agree - but the cammer could have done more to avoid a collision, such as understanding that he's in the blind spot, and either pushing ahead or dropping back. He'd already done a bunch of hard work by moving over to make space for the joining traffic.
@@smilerbob but what was worse, she then went and parked in a busy live lane.
And your car have brakes, whats the problem?
@@Gorf1234 why the mad rush to get to lane two..as soon as people join the main carriage way .. same on motorways .. from slip road to middle /outside lane .. she should have checked before changing lanes ..
#11 looks drunk, but as it's a Range Rover, perhaps the power steering was just the latest thing to break...
#11 are they pissed or checking the off road capability and collision impact detection capabilities
5:13 is probably the most offroading that Land Rover has ever done
Hilarious. US channels would feature 'barrel rolls', end-over-ends, helicopter footage of cop chases... and we have a rogue trolley at Morrison's 😂. Give me UK dashcam any day!
That trolley was possessed !
incline involved
That car doesnt look like a trolley to me.
Pretty sure a small sentient yellow car was chasing it
The ghost of Whitehaven
Lukasz must be the unluckiest driver on the road.
Always in these videos.
Literally thinking the same thing. No video is complete without a Lukasz clip.
He's just terrible at anticipating issues and often drives into danger.
True that he should have seen what was going on BUT, he was actually in the correct lane as the exit with the fuel station is the A17
@@Chris-fy8rk Indeed he was in the correct lane. But being right isn't really of higher value than not crashing. He's still a terrible driver due to this easily avoidable accident. Literally go round roundabouts in a staggered formation and you can't crash.
@1hd3szfgrdm13
Again...i agree
But lets admire that he actually used a lane correctly 😄
Always a treat when Unlucky Lukasz shows up.
@@zbf5h89ftb Nothing I recognise even though I can barely hear it.
#13 classic example of an entitled motorist looking down their nose at cyclists. Too busy trying to overtake them and not paying attention to what's actually happening in the road. He gave the driver plenty of notice that he was planning to take that turn, no different to another car or larger vehicle taking the same turn. Also the typical "Good job I wasn't speeding" line proves the driver thinks the cyclist's somehow expected to defer to him on the road and doesn't think he's responsible for his own actions.
Yes, the auto-back-pat for not speeding got me too. I feel confident that the limit on that road will be 30mph within a few years - it would be already, where I live.
😂
@@zbf5h89ftb I'd love to see this fictional second clip you've watched. Also whether or not the driver cycles is irrelevant. They still drive in an arrogant and entitled manner. I'd suggest you know nothing at all.
@@zbf5h89ftb psst, overtaking at a junction would be a test fail.
@@zbf5h89ftb Dude, nobody need to signal twenty seconds before a turn! 🤣
#13 Susan needs to retake her test if she thinks she was in the right.
Overtaking at a Junction - really bright !!
if you think she wasn't , presumably you have never passed a test of competence to drive .
Truly hope im never cycling and you are behind me😂
@@derekheeps1244 I am no fan of cyclist but he's right, she is in the wrong. If it was a car indicating right and she overtook it, who's fault do you thing the ensuing accident would have been? Same deal, the cyclist were in front of her, he looked over his should 1st and indicated he was turning, she was wrong to try an go past them when it wasn't safe to do so.
#13 “Not my fault if there’s a road collision because I wasn’t doing the speed limit yet” 🤦
Why are people not putting the times and doing # instead?
3:30 then we can link on it
@@Chris-fy8rk i think you mean 5:40, they are talking about clip #13.
@@johnnypay
See....thats the problem it causes
😄
@@Chris-fy8rk 😂
@@Chris-fy8rk its not really a problem, when it says the number in the bottom right corner, Personally i find it easier to look for the # number then time.
That trolley was out for revenge I recon. It clocked-that car was like target acquired 😂
#13 the vehicle in front of you in a single lane road wanted to turn right while you wanted to overtake, just wait
The cyclist started his manoeuvre late and without looking behind him before turning. If he'd been in the middle of the road the car could have continued.
@@benhartley2486 what do you mean the middle of the road?
@@fozzzyyy Where the dashed line is. That's where cyclists should manoeuvre to and stay before completing a turn to the right.
@waltersobchak1719 the cyclist checked his blind spot before indicating and moving over. The driver ignored that blind spot check and started to manouvre to overtake. Who knows if they were indicating or not. Either way, stupid place to try and overtake and the cyclist would never have seen them. The only thing the cyclist did wrong was not be in the middle of the road coming up to the junction. But then the cammer would have complained about that instead as they tried to overtake them.
@@benhartley2486 If you didnt see his shoulder check(as loads of other commenters did)you need to pay more attention.
Thanks, very interesting. At 00:35 he should have lost his licence, that was blatant rule-breaking.
And very close to a fatality.
Careless Driving?!? more like Dangerous Driving.
Very nearly one of those examples when one can't think of anything legal that would be justice enough.
Unfortunately in instances like this the police may wish to see a dangerous driving charge but the cps would agree to a lower charge as no one was killed or seriously injured to ensure a conviction. I agree it was dangerous, not careless. The driver knew exactly what he was doing.
it was , but also by the first two cyclists who clearly jumped THEIR lights also - I hope they were prosecuted also - not excusing the bad driving .
13 was the driver's error. Yes, he was holding back to start with, which showed considerate driving to the cyclists. But the driver fails to anticipate that the cyclist might want to turn off. Although it's frustrating, you have to really hang back with cyclists, even if you go down to second gear. The alternative is unthinkable.
No - it was entirely the cyclists in the wrong - no advanced planning whatsoever , no getting on course in a timely manner , no rear observation in a timely manner , just a last moment shoulder check then a hasty signal which does not give any time for reaction and a swerve across the entire width of the road with no regard for anyone else - dangerous and incompetent cycling . having left their move too late they both should have waited in the lay-by to the left .
@@derekheeps1244 Wrong
@@derekheeps1244 2 Highway codes that apply here : "DO NOT overtake if there is any doubt, or where you cannot see far enough ahead to be sure it is safe. For example, when you are approaching a corner or bend" and "DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road." There is clearly a bend, even if it's not a sharp one, followed by a junction. It was clearly unsafe to overtake. Car's fault 100%
The shopping trolley at 4.20 was like watching a Slapped Ham video 👻
#13 he didn’t indicate and pull out in front of you. He was in front of you, he looked behind and then indicated. Poor observation from you to not see it
@waltersobchak1719You don’t overtake at a junction bellend.
This clip and some of the comments moaning about the driver are what make so many people hate cyclists. And yes I do sometimes cycle as well as drive, but I don't just stick my hand out then move across when a car is about to pass me, that would be stupid.
@waltersobchak1719 you shouldnt overtake at junctions
@waltersobchak1719Because the road user in front of you may be turning into that junction.
Just like in this clip.
@waltersobchak1719 It's a shame you're alive to be honest.
#9 - interference from the spirit world
#11 - influence of a few spirits imbibed
#3 The amount of people that think indicating gives them right of way is crazy.
4:39 was literally humming the classic Jaws approaching music to myself 🤣
I did the same thing
Madness at its best. They think it's like the play station at home when nobody gets hurt or killed 😢
Well other cars have brakes so they can stop, and a steering wheel to avoid me?
@@anderstermansen130 I rest my case 🙄
13. What a fuss over nothing. You're going under the speed limit (good stuff) and the cyclist is clearly looking behind him before indicating and before moving out. Total non event
My thoughts exactly. If the cammer was upset by this it says a lot about their lack of awareness and looking ahead. The cyclist is seen looking over their shoulder and putting their arm out. The only person who did anything wrong was the car by not paying better attention.
its a typical thing on here. They see a cyclist and its "ugh these cyclist, must complain about them."
As a cyclist, I would always give a driver plenty of notice before a right turn. Between 5 - 10 seconds and I move out into the road, way before the junction. They are going much faster then me and I will come out the worse in accident. Just because it isn't wrong, doesn't mean he was in the right to make a sudden turn. A car driver isn't a mind reader and to trust a stranger to break swiftly on a sudden manuver is just asking for trouble.
What are you talking about?
It’s a clip. It’s valid, in that the vast majority of clips on these channels show daily events that I could capture on the way to work. The rarity is to find that one or two clips that you don’t often see.
This clip. Any action by a road user that causes another vehicle to take evasive action, including applying brakes is a total no no in the Highway Code. The clip, albeit very dull, still highlights issues to various viewers especially learners.
The cyclist changing direction without a sufficient indication of its move and takes action anyhow is incorrect. And the text is wrong, as the lady doesn’t have to follow at all - ride your own safe journey.
*Mores the question, what’s the car doing overtaking at a junction.*
Two wrongs don’t make … etc.
@@zbf5h89ftb you mean apart from when they were about to overtake at the junction??
#11 Katie Price out in her Range Rover again 😂
That trolley was most definitely sent by somebody 🤣🤣
#9 love how the trolley waits for the guy to walk past before making its final run 😂
5:13 Looks like another mum on the school run to me...
#2 I live about five minutes from Wichelstowe, and coming from the right turn, there is a mini roundabout, the amount of cars that turn right (from this clip), get to the next mini roundabout and then decide to indicate right as they’ve pretty much travelled all the way around the roundabout is mind boggling. The school kids are a lot more cautious now since this incident if you wanted to see any positivity from such a dreadful thing.
hope the entitled range rover driver has been reported
This is what worries me, I've had 2 drivers prosecuted through Operation Snap - rather than sending it to social media get it over to the police for prosecution. They are VERY good, in both cases I've had an email back within 24 hours saying they intend to prosecute.
@@james-5560 I reported a Rang for mounting the kerb. That was in South Yorkshire. The police confirmed to me that the driver had been sent on a "diversionary course."
The one in #15? Not great, but pretty poor on the peugeot side as well, to push everyone out of the way just to get in front of one car.
5:43 Lead cyclist did a blatant shoulder check, which should have been a MASSIVE clue about their intentions. YOU were the one who misread it and attempted an overtake when you shouldn't have.
@waltersobchak1719 no he wasn't. A shoulder check when a junction is coming up implies that the cyclist is about to use that junction. Car driver completely missed the clue. You know that, don't make it out as something else.
@waltersobchak1719Are you the poor cam turd? Looks like it.
@waltersobchak1719 The cyclist did exactly what he was supposed to do, look over shoulder, indicate and merge. I'm a cyclist myself and I've had many drivers argue and calling me names, I've told them all to learn to drive. In one occasion a police officer seen the driver cutting me off and fined him for road raging.
@waltersobchak1719 Because a lot of pedal cycles don't have mirrors; as in (...), signal, manoeuvre.
@waltersobchak1719 alright, if you say so. You carry on overtaking cyclists at junctions etc when they look over their shoulders and give hand signals. I won’t argue. It’ll be on you.
👍
@3.10 A17 / A16 Sutterton roundabout always problems with A17 eastbound traffic. Drivers who either try and get 1 or 2 vehicles in front by going in the wrong lane despite ample road and traffic signs or just don't look take notice of them.
To me it looked like cammer was in the wrong lane.
Why is No 8. " Singing" before the roundabout? 😂😂
Poor man struck by trolley. I noticed a limp and stiff neck , better call Saul
4:47 /#10 Wtaf, indeed. Cammer DW responds to a (granted, dangerous) emerge in front of him at some speed with neither emergency braking nor horn, but steering. Even if this were necessary, which is doubtful, no way was it necessary to spin it into an attempted overtake with an oncoming car already in view.
What we really need is a good way to give an apology, everyone makes mistakes. If you both met each other in a door, you'd say sorry. The incident at 2:55, whilst it should not have happened, did happen, and it was at least a sorry.
New subscriber from Germany here:)
hahah i wouldn't be so proud of that .. just wait till you see the Audi/Merc/BMW/VW clips ... mainly Audi's .. their owners really are a sight to behold .. stay tuned :)
@@kittyhawk9707 Here it is the same, big car,small brain, mostly arabs migrants.
@@kittyhawk9707 I thought that there was a distinct lack of Teutonic tin in this episode.
5.15 I'm sure that range rover driver was drunk , shocking driving
3:30 maybe time to learn the highway code lol
Which part?
Cam truck was in the lane for the A17 which is that exit he took.
Pretty crap roundabout the you use the Left lane for the 3rd exit
3:20 Is exit 3 straight ahead, there seems to be minor exits but I cant see road numbers. Cammer goes a way round to the exit used.
@@Chris-fy8rk You use the marked lane with the big white writing in the lane and the giant layout diagram. If you can't do that then you have to ask yourself if you should really be on the road.
@james-5560
What the fuck are you going on about?
Im not the driver dickhead.
I drive this roundabout daily in my truck and if it were daytime then.you would see on the sign that the Left lane for the A17 is the exit with the FUEL STATION
Its a shit designed roundabout now do one if you cant work out that i was informing this person who made the comment
Cam truck was in the correct, he was in the lane for the A17 and took the a17 exit (3rd exit). right lane was for the A16(S) only which was the 4th exit.
People keep telling me it's a courtesy to move over to lane 2 to allow merging traffic in, However the amount of videos I see, where someone does this and is then repaid by having that same pleb sideswipe them, I'd rather just stay in lane 1 and not let them in.
If you're talking about 0:47 (#3), just don't be an idiot like the cammer. Very clearly just sitting in that person's blindspot. No excuse for the Peugeot driver to not just look properly, but as drivers we need to be aware of whether or not we've been seen, and do something about it instead of letting a collision happen. That cammer should have sped up, slowed down, or sounded their horn, instead of just sitting their like a lobotomised lemming.
The trouble is in lane 2, you're in their blind spot. If you adjust accordingly and drive defensively, these sort of accidents can be avoided, but most drivers just sit there and go, 'well, I was in the right .. I'm not going to adjust my speed', etc.
It's the responsibility of the merging vehicle to find a gap.
I don't care who thinks it's "polite" to move over, I'll sit where I am, not overtaking therefore predictably in lane 1, being extra predictable on cruise at between 67 and 70.
If someone can't find a gap around that to merge safely then that's entirely their failing, not mine. I would and do expect the same when I join.
@@burgersnchips I mean, yeah, but it's also not difficult to do. You often don't need to move over and sometimes you can't help it, but saying you won't move over and it's solely the emerging vehicles problem is poor, even if it's not actually illegal. There are more reasons to move over beyond it just being nice.
Firstly, when traffic is heavy, cooperative driving in general means better traffic flow. That means queues are reduced, resulting in less fuel being wasted and shorter journey times. Those things are good for the environment and good for the economy. It's something that is less evident in one instance but if everyone was driving cooperatively then this tiny effect adds up.
Additionally, safety is increased if you move over. Ensuring someone isn't forced to stop, or significantly slow down, on a slip road means the risk of rear end collision on the slip road is reduced for them, and there is also less danger if they are not trying to accelerate onto a carriageway from a stopped position. The danger to you is also reduced as by positioning further over you have more time to react to what they do. If you are directly alongside them, they could be the sort of person to just force themselves out anyway, risking a collision. In that kind of situation you may not be culpable but you could also be dead. Or some innocent motorcyclist could be dead because they just happened to be nearby when it happens. Unlikely scenarios but lots of the things you do with driving are about ensuring the unlikely doesn't happen.
When traffic is busy it may not be possible to find a gap without people moving over to lane 2 to make space. Think about what happens if there are lorries or other slow accelerating vehicles trying to emerge. And if everyone took your attitude and just stayed in lane 1, slip roads would be constantly backed up as no one would be able to emerge for a couple hours at busy times.
Again, there are plenty of times when it is better to stay in your lane and not move out, and if traffic is light or the relative speeds of vehicles is right it isn't necessary. And yes, regardless of everything I've said, the emerging vehicle still has the final responsibility to ensure a safe emerge, I don't dispute that. But what exactly does refusing to move over accomplish? In what way is it the correct thing to do?
@@goodguykonrad3701Blind spot is a bogus excuse used by crap drivers to justify their bad driving. If you're not sure, you hold off until you are sure you are clear to merge.
No 3
Surely, if you are entering a motorway or dual carriageway, you must give priority to traffic already on the main road. To many drivers don't know how to merge in to traffic. .any believe giving a right signal give them the right to join even if someone is alongside. You can't expect drivers to move to the right to let you on. Ther may be another vehicle to the right preventing it.
Read the Highway Code. Its all there.
All true. But the cammer didn't do very well there either. The barrier was obstructing the merging cars view, and then by changing lanes they kept themselves in the merging cars blind spot longer. Not an excuse for the merging car not to look, but the cammer almost perfectly minimised opportunities for the merging car to spot them.
Spotting a potential conflict with merging traffic on the motorway is one of the easiest bits of defensive driving to pick up. the traffic is going in the same direction, so you have lots of time. And there is a strong visual cue, the other car will be getting larger but not moving relative to the frame of reference of your dash.
Your spot on target, merging onto the motorway/carriageway is coming off the minor road, when its same to do so to pull out, if theres a vehicle there slow down until a safe gap so very much spot on, drives a 2020 vehicle and thinks they own the road plus can see he/she never did a blind spot check in the first place, if she'd checked there mirrors they would not of pulled out
and then she decides to park in a busy live lane.
@@chriswhite9838 Yep 3 birds with 1 stone
5:09 three sheets to the wind ?? 😵💫
The shopping trolley should have had the jaws theme dubbed over!
Have to say, since starting to watch these videos, I'm driving a lot more carefully!
4.03 Ghost in the car park! lol
#15 absolute state of this
Thats why checking mirrors is always important. The RR driver should have seen the car flying up from behind as the road narrows and would have been so much easier all round to just let them pass, let them get on their way and maintain a safe distance. Too many drivers take it personally when someone gets in front. What does it matter if they get ahead ? They aren’t going to the same destination, its not a race. It actually makes no sense whatsoever why this irritates some people. No logic to it whatsoever.
4:25 - Did anyone get the trolley's number and report it?
Or did that Polo suddenly turn magnetic?
Just an FYI 3:10
The cam truck is actually using the correct lane here even tho it doesnt appear to be.
The exit he took with the fuel station is the A17 which is used by the Left lane
Absolute crap design of a roundabout
4:26 Yeah. Theres the ones who don't bother putting the trolleys away at all. Then there's the ones who half-heartedly chuck them vaguely at the trolley bay. Just awesome people. Love em.
The trolley choose violence
Wow not only stupid enough to not look in their mirrors before pulling out onto a motorway, but then to stop in a live lane. I hope this was reported to the police, they're too dangerours, that is 2 counts of driving without due care right there which should be a ban.
#2 I don’t even want to think about if that driver had been a second later 😮
2:50 if your stopping distance coming to a roundabout relies on the 5m length of a single car, then you are doing something wrong to start. if you are actually fully loaded at 44 tonne, even if there were no cars ahead, the speed and seemingly minimal steady braking is wild
Clip 9 the cart demon strikes again.
That's why I never park downhill from a trolley corral.
The main thing is, the 2 guys on the merc walked aimlessly down the side of the white line without looking to see if a truck was close thus wet close to being killed and the motorway being shut and sad messages pouring in saying what lovely lads they were,,,, anyway,
oh yeah always the same shite.. " Our Dwayne was such a blessing , lovely happy go lucky lad who had a heart of gold and will be sadly missed " .. yeah but what you don't know that Dwayne regularly kicked the shit out of people during his dodgy dealing lifestyle that nobody but a select few knew about
#9...Even the spooks have trolley rage lol
4:04 would have gone well with the Jaws theme
4:15 Mike Ehrmantraut from Breaking Bad / BCS everybody!
Looks like he's on his way to manage the payment booth at the exit barrier 🤩
Wonder what's in the rucksack? 😂
#8 cammer was in the wrong lane. Ironic considering the comments of "lanes clearly marked".
#8 Excellent music choice. Caption difficult to decrypt.
Im failing to see what the cyclist at #13 did wrong,clearly signaled his intention to turn right.
No he signalled as the car was already starting to over take. Personally i feel like bicycles should have indicators on them and not just relay on hand signals.
So signalling gave them the right of way?
the cammer should have slowed down and paid attention to the situation
The driver should have slowed as soon as he saw the right turn signal by the cyclist. The cyclist however should be positioned nearer the middle of the road if he intends to turn right.
@@TheSeafordianno, being in front of them on the road gives the priority.
6:14 - At least he straightened the pole for them. He's just got the other one to do now.
0:57
Never ever tell them you have a dashcam, let them lie to the insurance and be done extra for fraud attempt.
Of all the times I have been hit and it's been a few, every single one of them denied any wrongdoing. E v e r y single one of them.
#8 Lucaz was in the wrong lane
No he wasnt
He was in the lane for the A17 which is the 3rd exit.
Right lane is for the A16 S only at the 4th exit.
Crap design but he wasnt wrong
#13: YOU might not happen to like it, but cyclists ARE allowed to turn right.
Admitted but their skill levels were kinda low. (60 years a cyclist)
4:17 Spooky! 😱🤣
#15 Range Rover, prat plate - always a muppet.
4:24 I'm frreeeeeeeeee!!
#13 Driver misses the shoulder check, goes to overtake vehicle when indicating, then complains. Only one at fault here......
13# maybe don’t overtake at a junction and complain when someone makes a turn. I like it don’t that if it was a car slowing down? No cause you would think it’s turning. Never over take coming To a junction with cyclists especially if they are looking over their shoulder common sense.
#13 cyclist did have bad road positioning , but would you have overtaken a car that was signalling to turn right?
A shame that schools don't appear to do cycling proficiency courses anymore ...... it'd save a lot of grief on the roads
They do... it's called Bikeability. It's been nationwide since 2007 and 100,000s of 9-11 years olds have completed courses. I think over 4 million by now...
@2.22 shame there were no police around.There,fixed it for you.
We've clubbed together and got you this 👉:
2:22 😜
Thanks:::::: fat fingers.@@cookiemonster2299
Clip one was a blowout, OSF, low profile, likely the only reason they survived at that speed was because it was low profile and the difference in tire height was minimal.
6:11 Ouch... Trade plates, brand new cars, first tank of fuel... someone is for the high jump over that one I imagine.
#3. well done for actually using the using the indicator but using the indicator doesn't give you the right to; l it merely tells other road users your intentions of which should be safe before you actually carry out your intentions.
never tell them you have a dash cam. keep that surprise for their insurers. and don't waste your time by arguing who is at fault. that isnt you job. that's what you pay your insurer for.
understand this; you are not going to be making the final decision on who is at fault, the insurers will. exchange your details and then be on your way if you can.
Sutterton roundabout happens endless times aday . Clip8 is common . Signs from north are but drivers cant read .
at 2.00. The car that crashed was doing well over the 20MPH speed limit.
👍 Van driver on phone p ssed him off and well you seen the result.
Merc driver needs to take a drive with Ogmios.
#8 I'd like to know what he was SINGing before the roundabout!
4:40 Lucky to walk away from that one. Was the car a write-off?
An escaping Tesco trolley left a nice ding in the wing of my 306XSI from many years ago. I've not parked downhill from a trolley corral since.
How these people have licences is beyond me. Embarrassing.
#6 - "Lucky there was no police around".
They soon will be.
#8 Cammer in wrong lane.
A ghostly trolley..
It seems to be a thing these days to say that because you’re indicating it gives you the right to complete your manoeuvre regardless.
I have never heard or read anyone saying that. The none-too-radical "thing these days" is the idea that really good road use is about not just about following rules, but anticipating, defusing and making non-events of the errors of others.
@@ChrisBrown-px1oy Exactly. Merging on to a motorway is one of my big gripes. How can so many people be getting it so badly wrong? I’ve seen a few dashcam clips of people pulling onto lane 1 of the motorway from the hard shoulder as if they were pulling out to go to the shops. The old saying: they’ve never had an accident but seen hundreds.
Why is it always a mad rush to get from slip road to lane 2/3 in 1 bloody go ..
#2 absolutely disgusting. Which victim got a measly £34? And it's about time people started losing their licences for blowing red lights. Too much revenue generating and not enough keeping people safe.
Victim impact surcharge doesn’t actually go to the victim involved, it goes to a grant fund Police and Crime Commissioners, who commission local support services for victims. It is also used to help victims of the most serious cases of crimes I can’t write here or this comment will be blocked.
It's about time they started bringing in lifetime driving bans,
@@OldManGripStrength I could not agree more. And none of this exceptional hardship bs.
The victim didn’t get anything; most likely just carried on with their life, not knowing that the driver, who could have easily killed them, was penalised. The victim surcharge does not go to the victim of the incident, but is pooled and distributed through the Victim and Witness General Fund.
The victim got 34 pounds? Bless you! Comments like this don't really help your credibility
1:36 Mercedes driver pulls a move like that for what?. Enjoy you're insurance increase.
Along with everyone else's.
Tbh I think #6 is fair enough. Illegal yeah but fair enough
#11 - is that Katie Price (Jordan) ?
1:07 If someone can't be honest enough to admit their mistake then I can't be honest enough to tell them I have a dashcam. Just let them go away thinking they are gonna knock my insurance, then when their insurance contacts mine, I would send over the footage. Cos if they lie to me, and I was there, they won't think twice about lying to their insurance. Lying on an insurance claim if fraud.
There is never a police officer around when one is needed.!!!
They are all out rehearsing for their latest CH5 program or sewing gang badges on their outfits.
First one ??what did I MISS?????
Car in Lane 3 crashing into the barrier
5:24 YT14 BBE no tax or MOT, let's hope that means the driver has been caught.
They have probably sobered up by now
#1 was too fast but that overtake was badly timed. They should get their eyes tested.
I missed the text about shifting all three lanes 😮
#15 Self entitled muppet in Range Rover rages at car driver, then breaks the law driving down pavement what a tosser
The other car didn't merge,he forced hie way in causing the RR to brake,tho do agree was a prat driving on the pavement!
@@stevennazar2102 Yes it was not right what white car did but Highway code 168
Being overtaken. If a driver is trying to overtake you, maintain a steady course and speed, slowing down if necessary to let the vehicle pass. Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass. Speeding up or driving unpredictably while someone is overtaking you is dangerous. Drop back to maintain a two-second gap if someone overtakes and pulls into the gap in front of you.
3:33 did he say "Gap year dollar"?
It does sound lke that. Unforunately there's no transcript to give us a clue - and most likely, a further laugh.
#8 if you look at the sign on the road the truck took the 3 exit he should have either taken exit 1 or 2.yiu was in the wrong
Put the time (3:10) rather then #8 then it can be clicked on to go straight to the clip.
And you are wrong.
Cam truck was in the left lane for the A17 which IS the exit he took with then fuel station.
Crap designed Roundabout tbf
You're completely wrong. left lane was marked and signed posted for the A16(N) 2nd exit and A17 3rd exit. right lane was for the A16(S) only 4th exit. 1st exit was just a minor road so wasn't explicitly mentioned. you can check it yourself on google maps if you want, its here 52°53'23.8"N 0°05'03.3"W. cam truck was coming on the A17 from the west.
Earlier responses have pointed out that the vehicle was in the correctly marked lane but HGVs often need to use outer lanes of roundabouts regardless of marking so they can get round.
0:57 use your bloody horn!
send vids to police and they should send them to insurance companies so they then can put there premiums up. only way for the stupid and arrogant drivers
Susan smith no13 why was you over taking on a junction , the cyclists were in the complete right
05:20 Katie Price alert!
It is past time deliberate dangerous driving carried a charge of attempted murder. Fifteen years in prison may deter some of the criminals or get them off the roads.
the 45 year old is that all he has got?
No later he was bundled into the back of a Ford Transit .. blind folded .. got kneecapped so he couldn't run away ... taken to an old warehouse ..where he was strapped to a chair ... where alongside him where various hammers, drills , knives, belts and other stuff .. afterwards he was driven blindfolded down the M62 to a random location .. dropped off and said Transit drove away .... At least he won't be on the road for quite some time .. given that he has to crawl to get help and he won't be in a fit state to do anything for a long long time .
I presume you wanted something like that as punishment for the 45yr old .. did you ?? not that it has anything to do with YOU what the Courts decided ..