Well it’s crossed examination so it’s considered that the witness is hostile so yes or no questions are fine. The question you stated in your comment was an open-ended question so the witness can tell his story. If you said: “You beat your wife” That is the type of question you would ask.
@Paul Frank Then your not a real republican.. Your a closet democrat.. Idk about you but ever since trump took office I have seen a increase in my Simple IRA account due to the stock market keeps kicking ass has yet to plummet due to what some democrats said would happen if he got elected.. How many lies are those people gunna tell before democrats see what the hell is really going on.. Bill Maher wanted a economic collapse like the Great Depression just to get trump out of office and with the collusion for 2 years and no indictments and they still say he did.. WAKE the hell up !
@Paul Frank yeah... he is... wont deny it... but hes doing a hell of a job as the president. I dont have to like HIM... I like the institution he has put together for our country.
@Megan 1. time is limited 2. avoiding, giving the run around to questions is a move to run down the clock -- so if someone continues to do so, you will talk over them to reclaim your time and redirect from a pivot 3. it's understandable you wouldn't want to walk directly into a perjury trap but it's pretty alarming the head of the DOJ would have to tip toe around such if things were without flaw 4. as a former prosecutor, if the head of the department of justice / the chief law enforcement officer in the country is giving a senate committee the run around during a hearing -- you would only HOPE a prosecutor would nail them down and control the interaction.
I suggest that all members of Congress when asking questions at hearings be considered under oath so that provable lies by them can be considered perjury.
Turning the White House into Courtrooms should be banned and unconstitutional as a matter of separation of powers...They are representaives not judges, nor the Judicial Branch..That's why nothing ever comes from this
@@charlottec.7881 Well would you prefer to have her question him on a pretty daisy -filled meadow with a picnic blanket spread close to a lake, both resting cordially on it, eating cakes, drinking beverages and then for Harris to ask the Attorney General questions with a loving tone whilst grinning forgivably at him ? Bottom line is you have to be tough when it comes to fighting possible compromises to the system of Law. In any country.
@Dj Salazar Exactly it is a process. Barr is the decision maker, he looks at the evidence presented by those who were supposed to gather it first. Think of it this way, does a judge go find out if a killer is actually a killer? Or does the judge rely on the detectives evidence and make a decision based off of that?
@Dj Salazar Ok but he IS NOT an investigator. The judge doesnt go to a crime scene "to look at the underlying evidence". A Judge makes a decision based on evidence presented by others, the Judge himself/herself does not do the investigating. That is the part Kamala is pretending to not know, making it seem as if has any power to do so and asking questions that are straight up insincere.
Barr is screwing with your democracy and we saw that happening in Germany 80 years ago in my country. Less than half a mile are the graves of those who lost their lives and you worry about some grandstanding that obviously isn't grandstanding - it's dicking into the bias of an office supposed to be unbiased see if your constitution. Oversight is entitled in this case, fellas.
When Ms. Harris was a prosecutor and states attorney, did she investigate every witness and every piece of evidence or did she rely on the policy [police] report?
Were those investigations that included the highest office in this nation? Did they involve the threatening of our democracy? Did it include foreign countries that had hacked our elections? No.
Kim B this right here might be the single most uninformed comment I’ve seen on this site. It seems you clearly do not understand the situation at hand, and neither does Rita.
@@davaughndenton356 now you say “Lies” even though he wasn’t lying and that has been proven with the published documents regarding the mueller report. Now in regards to yes or no questions that is unfair. They are trying to make things black and white and when you do that it gives an unfair question to the person being asked. Barr is on a whole other level than Harris.
@@davaughndenton356 that is actually false because if you are found lying under oath you could face penalties and yes or no questions have constantly been criticized for that. Yes or no is such an extreme and with the questions presented by Harris, without explanation the answers could bite Barr in the back even though he did nothing wrong. Please don’t argue with me on this, I am studying law right now and I can school you any day of the week. Please get informed on topics before debating them or else you look as foolish as you are.
Harris: ( to AG Barr)-" If you picked a peck of pickled peppers, how many pickled peppers did you actually pick?" Barr :"Ummm , a peck?" Harris : "Just a yes or no answer"
Harris: “Its obvious, Mr. Barr, you are ignorant of the Special Counsel’s conclusion on picking peppers specifically for pickling purposes. Its deeply troubling to think what else is not known by you, let’s see, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Yes or No... Barr: I hunt woodchucks, which are pests. And incidentally Senator, I was enrolled as a Government Studies major at Columbia University while you were still pooping your pants.
Wow, you're really fucking dumb if you didn't understand all those "Big" words that she was asking. I'm a fucking drunkard and I understood what she was asking, and it was a very simple question.
@@davidhughes5369 He read the report, Harris asked if he looked at the evidence behind the report which would be evidence of a 2 year investigation and be an investigation of the investigation...
I was expecting Barr to go full Office Space here. "Well-well look. I already told you: I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don't have to! I have people skills; I am good at dealing with people. Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?"
I agree! Especially since Trump is in office. I watched the whole Hilary Clinton questioning, and when the first Trump Russia investigation was concluded. Best drama ever. This lady was not ready for Barr...
Liberals use their spare time by banning straws, waging war on cow farts and banning meat... Republicans use their spare time, learning how to shoot better.. If a civil war did breakout, it will be over in three seconds.. 🐱
so funny, she makes her allegations and she knows the processes, but she doesn’t allow him to explain or explain because she doesn’t want the american people to understand the process, she just keeps doing all she can to interject and confuse issues. She doesn’t fool me.
He literally claimed that he didn’t even review the evidence in Mueller’s investigation personally. That is the most insane, farcical claim I could possibly imagine when it is arguably the most important legal event in the history of the United States. Barr is an absolute clown. It is also a lie, and will be shown as such if justice prevails.
agentanaranjado Democrats may have turned Congress into a three ring circus, but I really don’t think it’s apt to call Attorney General William Barr a clown
Matt The problem is that you are thinking in terms of sides and parties. We all need to stop this. Objectively consider what he is saying: he is literally saying that he, the top law enforcement entity, didn’t care to review the details of an investigation of the President of the United States for a reason he never elaborates. If ANYONE is investigating the POTUS (or even anyone else of stature, for that matter!) you would clearly review that! Why is he lying here?
Hello Elisabeth,I am completely unbiased in your politics, (I am British)I but I have to say that it is clear to a neutral observer;that William Barr is attempting to conceal dishonesty,and obfuscate his way through this hearing here.Surely,all he had to do, was to answer her questions honestly;he doesn't, so Kamala Harris intellectually gelds him as a result, in order to expose his deceit. In the process he also make himself look extremely stupid, and further, show cases her obviously, impressive, cognitive abilities.From my neutral perspective ,i like honesty, and cannot blame Ms Harris for seeking the truth;she has nothing to hide here, he clearly has,so it is William Barr who is trying to fool you, and not Kamala Harris . to my mind from your comment , he seems to have done a pretty good job of doing so already .
I noticed that too. She clearly is very perplexed by the inexplicable arguments and lame defenses coming across the lips of none other than America's chief law enforcement officer. God help us all.
She always asks ridiculous questions that have no basis in logic in an attempt to create some contrived scandal where there is none because she has nothing!
Lol so they would review the evidence supporting the report that took 2 years to gather? 🤡🤪 what a bitch! She questioned Judge Kavanaugh in the same manner 😳🤡. What a clown! 🤡
random person damn right I’m scared. I’m scared if Biden that old geezer will croak or be committed leaving that Hillary wannabe in charge. I’ll admit to being scared of that. She’s a nasty power hungry bitch that will say or do anything to get her way.
When i charge is presented to a judge or DA for prosecution, does the Judge interview all the neighbors, witnesses etc or does he assume that what is in the police report accurate? Duh!
lol she's gonna do ANYTHING she can to just make barr look bad. she might as well have asked "did you do ANYTHING at all to prevent the actions on 9/11/2001? YES OR NO THATS A YES OR NO QUESTION!!!! ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!"
@@kidfunkyfri3308 DID YOU TRIPPLE CHECK ALL THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ENTIRE REPORT AFTER OTHERS HAD CHECKED CHECKED AND RECHECKED????? THEN YOU MUST HAVE MISSED SOMETHING! lol that's her whole argument here. unreal.
Except in this case, there WAS NO CHARGE presented. So they are demanding a proof that something is not in evidence, which is a logical fallacy. Furthermore, we are all considered innocent until PROVEN guilty in the US Justice System.
@@simongill4715 hahahahaha. yeah she made him look bad didnt she liberal?? lmao.. read the law on the office of the special counsel.. evidently that loserette didnt hahahaha. barr is stumbling because he's thinking "why the hail is she asking me these dumbazz questions????!!! .
@@portbizz no hes stumbling because she, rightfully, accused him of not looking at the actual evidence and giving trump a free card, you moron. Thats literally what being corrupt is.
Because half of the senators are running for president in 2020 and this is free publicity . Not necessarily good publicity if the watchers/listeners are clear thinking individuals but publicity nonetheless.
@tiredofpc K, shilling? Did you even watch the video? There isn't enough evidence in Mueller's report to prosecute. What other decision could he have made? If you're a real person, please read up on this investigation. Otherwise, get outta here, troll.
Kamala and Booker are two of the biggest ding dongs ever..,reminds me of the kavanaugh crap again.. these buttholes are always trying to make something out of nothing.. I’m embarrassed for America these two are US senators.
Senator Booker looks like a kid in law school for the first day and was able to prove a classmate was lying during an interrogation exercise. LMAO 🤣 🤣 🤣
fattyjaybird unfortunately there are plenty of stupid folks out there who buy into this stuff . If you say something enough times people believe it . Well stupid people . The same ones who will vote for the empty vessel Biden
Dems:"We need to investigate the investigation on how it was investigated." Republicans:"Sorry Dems, we're going to investigate the phony investigation to unseat a sitting president.
@@johnvanamburg5081 I understood the point of her questions quite clearly. She was grandstanding. She wants people to think shes so smart. I want to know why she thinks the AG should investigate the investigation that took 2 and a half years to investigate. It is not his job to do that. It is his job to take the report that Mueller gave him and make a decision based on the facts in that report. I don't get why that concept is so hard to understand. You would think a former prosecutor would get it.
@@rhondarudolph4603 Hi Rhonda, no, I don't think you understood the point of her questions at all. Mr. Barr put out a statement to the media that "the evidence" did not support a charge of obstruction of justice. Kamala got Mr. Barr to admit he never actually reviewed "the evidence" before issuing that statement. That's the point.
@@TombRaider666 You too. There was a time in Trump's campaign where he instructed you all to hate her. If you honestly think she is evil, i wonder what you would say about Trump. The man did so many evil things during his short four years that even God had to send covid to help remove him from office.
Oh cry me a fucking river! She was trying to make something out of nothing the whole time! She was full of shit! It was proven! She was also trying to be a smart ass
@@bextyler551 I don’t care about “sexism” so who gives a shit.....imagine she was trying to make something out of nothing and now here you are doing the same! You liberals just have to have something to feel “oppressed” about so someone will feel sorry for you and give you attention
She's trying so hard to spin the truth. She knows Mueller found 0% of evidence to charge Trump with any crime. Why not investigate Clinton, which there is so much evidence its ridiculous that she committed numerous crimes?
She constantly expected him to never interrupt her, yet she got to interrupt him all she wanted to, even when he was needing to think about how to answer her questions. It was disgusting. She was really snide as well.
Exactly. When she pauses then Barr would rebut she would interrupt him with "i'm not finished". It's quite a pathetic tactic to degrade your opposition.
Donna Knudson with all due respect if you know the truth you don’t need to think about the question... you simply answer with the truth... even if the truth is not the answer they want to hear
Fernando padilla it is more of HOW to answer. These fools twist and manipulate words all the damn time. She isn’t quite as foolish as AOC, but foolish nonetheless.
@@mrsmith7936 they didnr let him speak. Republicans let him speak when they could. Make no mistake. The A.G. is no idiot. Them dems launched an attack full force on him. He held his own most would have lost their temper way before he did. Most keyboard warriors would have wet seats at a house judiciary committee "testimony " was more like a witchhunt.
@@mrsmith7936 You are already extinct, you ignorant, arrogant lemming. Keep your head up your butt. You're making all this winning far too easy. Thank you.
and the answer is yup, i forsee some dems that dont have any clue that they are in trouble when Barr and the prosecuter get done looking at how the dems cheated, lied, and all the illegal crap they did they are all scared and if you dont think so think again
Gotta love how she asks a multi-part question then wants a YES/NO answer. It's sad to see this person is a heartbeat from the Presidency with her attitude.
+Kosm _ ~ Rolling in the floor. They got what they paid for and some more. That money all those boys on the right took from the NRA came from Russia. You’re right on point.
Daniel Perez I just want to know what page of the Mueller report the evidence of collusion is on! Please help! I am severely inbred and my brain don’t think right
HAHAHA. I've been saying for a long time that I wish somehow someway ben carson could end up in front of one of her committees. i guarantee you if she says it too many times.. he would say it back to her. LMAO!!!
All 3 of them look like a comedy show and the ring leader in this 🎪 and that's Kamala Harris! Kamala why don't u ask how many are involved in the Russian Hoax? Obama,,Biden,,Hillary,,Comey,,Muller etc Christopher Wray u name it
@@micheledenise2305 awww you maddddd that’s the Vice President of the USA 😂😂😂 she will be remembered for decades she’s iconic asf lmao and you lmao well you will be forgotten just as you are now 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😝 silly European
No shit... That Barr is a man of honor! I like the way he immediately starts pointing the finger at other people when things get hot!! Just like The Donald!! GO TRUMP!!
@@Chickenchummer hey. go easy on him man. he can't help that he was born with a small penis, lack of testosterone levels, overly emotional feelings and an overall sensitive mind. cmon now...stop being mean! He can't help that his brain isn't fully developed therefore he votes with his emotions and not on the issues. that was mean! lay off him man! he's fragile!!
pavanatanaya, read a report based on a fake and sham of an investigation? The Democrats are about to get their crap sandwich handed right back into their faces!
@@jenjose28 well i would not define it as arrogance. the constitution grants her a certain amount of time within which she can do whatever she wants, such as interrupting any witnesses.
Well they clearly don’t stick to simply answering the questions. They have limited time and they purposely do this to make sure few questions can be asked.
Actually, it is his (and any prosecutor or judge's) job to review evidence in any charging decision. You can't base a decision to charge or not charge without having reviewed the evidence. If Barr was like a judge in a speeding ticket case, everyone would have to pay the speeding ticket even if there was evidence on traffic cams showing the driver to be safe. He is essentially ignoring the traffic cam footage figuratively, but saying that he based his decision on the footage. Him reviewing the evidence is simply what attorneys are supposed to do, it's a basic function as an attorney, it does not in any way undermine mueller's credibility, it simply gives him further reason to support or accept his conclusions when he understands why those conclusions in the report were reached. He did not perform a basic function that is essential to any charging decision.
In your example of being a judge of a speeding case. The judge was presented with an official authority detailed investigative report on the footage, time stamp by time stamp, event by event (thus 35mil research using up tons of manpower by Mueller); it will not be far off base to judge base on the report since it has been factually check by an official authority. Back to this case, if having to verify the authenticity of the report, it would mean an additional 35mil USD for AG Barr to speak to those witness, review evidence again. It will mean that it should be an AG Barr report and not Mueller report.
It's all just an effort to buy time and try a different tactic to destroy Trump. No one with any sense (and certainly not Barr) is fooled by what's happening here.
@@sarenadelgado7608 if it was the other way around all these people would be pointing out exactly what you're pointing out right now they're not stupid they're just racist
joseph banks or instead of acting like a bag of rocks maybe he should answer the questions truthfully since he is supposed to be the top legal person in the US.
She is so incredibly disrespectful and condescending. Not paying attention to any of his answers and rifling through her papers, telling Barr “I’m not finished when he tries to answer”, interrupting Barr anytime he has an answer and smiling/giggling its honestly embarrassing to watch.
Clayton Gunter what kind of person hold evidence of a inmate on death row that proves he didn’t do it until she is forced to release it. She is a piece of crap
Kel Lee to save the names of intelligence officers who are under cover, as per the CIA and military branches. Congress has access to the report with 99% un-redacted. They didn’t find any issues with it.
@Meadow Apple that's completely untrue there were multiple instances in which he found trump could be charged but he left that decision to to barr. He even wrote a letter to barr about how he was wrong to just dismiss everything the way he did.
@Kel Lee What evidence? The Steele dossier that Hillary paid for? Remember, James Comey assured us that the Steele dossier, contrary to testimony of his subordinate Andrew McCabe (already facing criminal referrals) was not the chief evidence presented to a FISA court. That was a lie. And if it is not, Comey’s other evidence he presented is likely to be compromised. 1) his submitted dossier evidence was compiled by a contractor paid by Hillary Clinton; 2) that ex-British spy Christopher Steele’s work was unverified; 3) that Steele’s relationship with Comey’s FBI has already been severed due to Steele’s unprofessional behavior; 4) that submitted news accounts of “collusion” were in circular fashion based on the dossier itself. Comey likely also lied in telling Trump he wanted to brief him on the dossier in worries that the press might otherwise report on it first. In fact, his meeting with Trump by design was the necessary imprimatur the press had been waiting for to leak information from the dossier, which shortly followed. So keep telling yourself that the "evidence" is there and someone is hiding it from you. You sound just like the birthers from 8 years ago.
I see a lot of comments about her sounding intelligent. Please remember, she didn't write those questions. She can't take her eyes off her notes. When she is making speeches now and she's cackling, you will notice she isn't looking at the speech. That's her natural demeanor.
I WANT CLIPS AS HER AS A JUDGE!! Everyone found guilty as she presided should get an APPEAL!! Who thinks her IQ breaks 100? Oh I am a TOUGH BROAD, made even worse that I do not know the LAW!!
Are you seriously delusional enough to think that the Democratic Party is dying? I think its quite the contrary. I used to vote republican until Trump tainted the party, and every republican was too weak to stand up for the true values of the party. Now I have to accept the fact that what was once my party (and Im assuming yours) is going to be nothing but a greasy shit stain on the pages of American history.@@TheGregHeff
@@apolloscrow3686 Nobody is being held accountable, for what? Running a great country! You must be living in one of those Pot-Head Harris hallucinogenic states! The fact that you even think you have even a slight chance at wining 2020, is like saying the Ants can overcome the boots, that step on them! ..but good luck! Ha! "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" #JustTrumpEm
@@apolloscrow3686 i know you live in your echo chamber, but look at the like/dislike of the comments. you should make an effort to get out and see other peoples views. you're only repeating the same old tired ass shit that the msm has been feeding you. over 2 years of "russia russia russia" should have been at least SOME kinda of red flag that they're lying to you.
She is deserving of CONTEMPT, laughter is a healthy response to her lies and attempts to accuse him of wrongdoing in contradiction to FACTS ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE aka the publicly released Mueller Report
Childish and immature right? I feel like if he were half as respectable as he thinks he is, he could at least take this shit seriously. This isn't a joke no matter how 'ridiculous' it might be.
@@amylieu6084 - People saying shit like you did just then is exactly why Trump won back in 2016, and why he'll be reelected in 2020. I hope you're pleased with yourself :D
I tot hit in the head with an ice pick which caused me to have a stroke because I was protecting both party's from harm lucky on me, not lucky to my head that caused all the damage to having a stroke when I was the age of 32 and for 10 years I been waiting on payment due to victims of crime.
+Diane M - Sadly Diane walls keep you in too. There is so much concentration on the southern border that the northern border is being neglected. What are they going to do, fence us all in? They already have kids I mean kids dying in cages no matter where they come from. It’s not right. I m tired of living in fear. People calling the police on you for nothing. People won’t speak to you if you don’t look like them. Hell people won’t speak to you if you look like ‘em either. This is just too chaotic for me. I’ve got about $90,000 in savings and I know it’s not much, but if things don’t change I’m out. I can’t take much more of it. I have a granddaughter, I don’t want her to get shot at school or church.
Kamala is the king of the "Do you still beat your wife?" line of questioning.
Nick Z 🥵
Well it’s crossed examination so it’s considered that the witness is hostile so yes or no questions are fine. The question you stated in your comment was an open-ended question so the witness can tell his story. If you said: “You beat your wife” That is the type of question you would ask.
@@henryeberman6342 Ally you are completely wrong in your assessment. Any answer is an admission of beating your wife.
@@all_skate Plead the 5th.
@@d3l3tes00n Just answer YES or NO Mr. Seduction!!!!
Report didn't make them happy so they try to discredit the report.
"Mueller sucks we hate him now!"
Bingo!
@Paul Frank Bullshit
@Paul Frank Then your not a real republican.. Your a closet democrat.. Idk about you but ever since trump took office I have seen a increase in my Simple IRA account due to the stock market keeps kicking ass has yet to plummet due to what some democrats said would happen if he got elected.. How many lies are those people gunna tell before democrats see what the hell is really going on.. Bill Maher wanted a economic collapse like the Great Depression just to get trump out of office and with the collusion for 2 years and no indictments and they still say he did.. WAKE the hell up !
@Paul Frank yeah... he is... wont deny it... but hes doing a hell of a job as the president. I dont have to like HIM... I like the institution he has put together for our country.
Gosh, VP Kamala is a Superhero. Her fiery intelligence and conviction is quite remarkable to behold!!!
VOTE 💙..
Kamala: Yes or No please sir.
Barr: *dank face*
Me: *Stuffs my face with chips*
Could you repeat that question pls 😂
Context doesn’t matter to them even though it can be important
@Megan EXACTLY!!!
@Megan He was evading the question and Kamala just wanted to get him back to the questioned asked.
@Megan
1. time is limited
2. avoiding, giving the run around to questions is a move to run down the clock -- so if someone continues to do so, you will talk over them to reclaim your time and redirect from a pivot
3. it's understandable you wouldn't want to walk directly into a perjury trap but it's pretty alarming the head of the DOJ would have to tip toe around such if things were without flaw
4. as a former prosecutor, if the head of the department of justice / the chief law enforcement officer in the country is giving a senate committee the run around during a hearing -- you would only HOPE a prosecutor would nail them down and control the interaction.
I suggest that all members of Congress when asking questions at hearings be considered under oath so that provable lies by them can be considered perjury.
FUCK YEA, TEAR THAT FCKED UP SMIRK OF HARIS BITCH FACE !
Even still it won't matter and nothing will be done because they constantly get caught in lies and they routinely discuss that in meetings. LOLOL
Stupid.
@@estronkadar7277 maga maggot
Hillary was right. Deplorable Trailer park trash.
God please bring these people evil and lies to light they need to be humbled by the truth and we need to be set free by the truth.
Amen Enrique!! He will, it all comes into the Light!! ; )
The report is out lol. The truth is already out there.
@@lynnm.2019 So you are including Hillary too?
Barack Hussein Obama started all this bullshit
@@DonkeyLipsDA3rd Sorry DM in what??
Senator Bookers facial expressions in the background are golden 😏
Too true.
Oh yeah, he really got the Republicans on that one! Shut up dude
@@LamarandteddyRelax snowflake 😌
@@Lamarandteddy you poor snowflake.
He’s almost as big a buffoon as she is.
Bookers face is priceless
I can't believe these people get paid to act like this. Unreal.
They forget they are servants. They forget their role is to protect us from themselves.
They have zero desire to protect us from themselves.
Complete waste of money
I feel like low-key who's really running this country ??? Not this idiots
Have you ever seen a video of British parliament?
Reza Farshad ABSOLUTELY!! And we put them there. Remember this around election time.
You know what irks me? How many times have we seen these congressional hearing , questioning etc.... over the years and NOTHING comes from it.
Yup weird
The congress doesn't have the power to do amything other than question in these situations. Civics.
Turning the White House into Courtrooms should be banned and unconstitutional as a matter of separation of powers...They are representaives not judges, nor the Judicial Branch..That's why nothing ever comes from this
It’s an actual waste of time and money.
BDR CHRIST It’s all a show.
I watch this over and over love it
I'm sorry but I find your comment really sad! TDS is a real thing and I believe you are suffering from TDS.....
Cory Booker has a look on his face ....waiting for a gotcha moment in one of Barr’s responses..... such slimy people!
no hes laughing at barrs slimyness dumbass.
@@jakcunknown708 exactly
He can’t even contain himself! This is not how people behave who understand what makes America great.
Boogerman in the background
He’s always coked out. Big Bug Eyes Booker
We are getting to see the swamp rats in action
American Best Garage Door Service. Mr Barr
She is one of the worst rats.
Exactly.
@@stroys7061 LOL Weak. She's a former Attorney General. She knows how to do the job. And she's doing it masterfully here.
No she is being rude cutting him off trying to lead him to the answer she wants she’s a bitch
Booker sitting there thinking, ''She might be talking but I'm still Spartacus.''
hahahaha
I watched his face. I love him too.
Cory Booger.
He reminds me of xerces from 300 🤣
Lol
Harris shows no respect.
Harris body language very negative
She’s always out to “get” someone. And you’re right she has NO respect for anyone
No its the body language of someone catching someone on their bullshyt... yall are blind lmao
No respect.liars
@@charlottec.7881 Well would you prefer to have her question him on a pretty daisy -filled meadow with a picnic blanket spread close to a lake, both resting cordially on it, eating cakes, drinking beverages and then for Harris to ask the Attorney General questions with a loving tone whilst grinning forgivably at him ? Bottom line is you have to be tough when it comes to fighting possible compromises to the system of Law. In any country.
@@Dbreakz1 like Trump
Man his answers much better than “ I can speak to that, while under an investigation”.
Hilary Clinton is the most unlikable candidate ever.
Kamala Harris: Hold my beer.....
Smell that? Smells like sexism.
@@skepticlove smells more like a hyper-sensitive pussy in the comments
Chris your a DUMBASS
skepticlove it shows true weakness of your character to say that. Try improving your life and you’ll stop resorting to that Hail Mary pass
Chris R More like take her teeth out and put the knee pads on, like she did for Willy to get her job
Notice how when she ask questions.he all of a sudden has selective amnesia.
Wtf is the point of hiring muller if u expect him review the evidence that muller was paid to investigate
Dj Salazar - he’s taken way too long. Makes me suspicious of this process.
@Dj Salazar Exactly it is a process. Barr is the decision maker, he looks at the evidence presented by those who were supposed to gather it first. Think of it this way, does a judge go find out if a killer is actually a killer? Or does the judge rely on the detectives evidence and make a decision based off of that?
@Dj Salazar Ok but he IS NOT an investigator. The judge doesnt go to a crime scene "to look at the underlying evidence". A Judge makes a decision based on evidence presented by others, the Judge himself/herself does not do the investigating. That is the part Kamala is pretending to not know, making it seem as if has any power to do so and asking questions that are straight up insincere.
It's a process...
The point is to keep public busy and keep them thinking, which will help them with controlling the public
Harris isn't asking questions to get answers; she's grandstanding, and it's nauseatingly smug, self-righteous, and glib.
And she fits right in with binden she keeps her legs behind her ears and binden loves that
It’s sad how she was the best out of the Democrats
Barr is screwing with your democracy and we saw that happening in Germany 80 years ago in my country. Less than half a mile are the graves of those who lost their lives and you worry about some grandstanding that obviously isn't grandstanding - it's dicking into the bias of an office supposed to be unbiased see if your constitution. Oversight is entitled in this case, fellas.
It just proves that you’re brain dead.
@@markdagostino9666 oh yes, yet another charming, tolerant, open-minded leftist. Shocker.
When Ms. Harris was a prosecutor and states attorney, did she investigate every witness and every piece of evidence or did she rely on the policy [police] report?
Were those investigations that included the highest office in this nation? Did they involve the threatening of our democracy? Did it include foreign countries that had hacked our elections? No.
Kim B this right here might be the single most uninformed comment I’ve seen on this site. It seems you clearly do not understand the situation at hand, and neither does Rita.
@@ritacasaverde wait....was she on the counsel when hillary killed 13 men in benghazi?
Rita, what is your response?
@@ritacasaverde I really like your name
Well we know why Barr didn't answer her question even more so now.
Why?
Zzzzzzzzz🤣😂trump behind
The fact Barr rolled on trump…. She torched him here
Everyone watching this: HARRIS LET HIM ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!
@F Last he actually wasn’t but ok :D
@@johnnysins6330 he really was and he was trying to side step. The questions required yes or no answers not detailed lies.
@@davaughndenton356 now you say “Lies” even though he wasn’t lying and that has been proven with the published documents regarding the mueller report. Now in regards to yes or no questions that is unfair. They are trying to make things black and white and when you do that it gives an unfair question to the person being asked. Barr is on a whole other level than Harris.
@@johnnysins6330 no if you have to go around the question then you're being untruthful. Yes or no is just that yes or no.
@@davaughndenton356 that is actually false because if you are found lying under oath you could face penalties and yes or no questions have constantly been criticized for that. Yes or no is such an extreme and with the questions presented by Harris, without explanation the answers could bite Barr in the back even though he did nothing wrong. Please don’t argue with me on this, I am studying law right now and I can school you any day of the week. Please get informed on topics before debating them or else you look as foolish as you are.
Harris: ( to AG Barr)-" If you picked a peck of pickled peppers, how many pickled peppers did you actually pick?" Barr :"Ummm , a peck?"
Harris : "Just a yes or no answer"
That made my night.... thank you😎
Diane CAMPBELL Yes be too!!!
Harris: “Its obvious, Mr. Barr, you are ignorant of the Special Counsel’s conclusion on picking peppers specifically for pickling purposes. Its deeply troubling to think what else is not known by you, let’s see, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Yes or No...
Barr: I hunt woodchucks, which are pests. And incidentally Senator, I was enrolled as a Government Studies major at Columbia University while you were still pooping your pants.
“And in conclusion.... milk, milk, lemonade… Around the corner fudge is made… “! “Was there Fudge or not mr Barr?.. Yes or no”??!
Wow, you're really fucking dumb if you didn't understand all those "Big" words that she was asking. I'm a fucking drunkard and I understood what she was asking, and it was a very simple question.
Why would any Attorney General look behind a two year fact finding investigation when they were given a 400+ page report?
YEAH... He is way too busy to be reading a 400-page report!! Go, Barr!!
@@davidhughes5369 He read the report, Harris asked if he looked at the evidence behind the report which would be evidence of a 2 year investigation and be an investigation of the investigation...
I don't think you know how convictions work Buddy
Cause it’s not his job. Especially personally reviewing it, too. That’s undermining the FBI without any warrant.
Turkey muffin what do u mean ‘convictions’?
"Yes or no..you don't know...okay" rolls eyes😂😂
I was expecting Barr to go full Office Space here. "Well-well look. I already told you: I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don't have to! I have people skills; I am good at dealing with people. Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?"
Ahahahahah good one
C-SPAN is where I go now for real drama!
I agree! Especially since Trump is in office. I watched the whole Hilary Clinton questioning, and when the first Trump Russia investigation was concluded. Best drama ever. This lady was not ready for Barr...
More Entertaining than a Soap Opera
The swamp is going to start a civil war with these games.
Jay Huska , unfortunately, it seems that is the whole purpose of dividing this divine nation.
@@zelmiracholevova184 pretty sure obama did that. -A guy who voted for him in 2008 and will never vote Dem again.
These current holders of office believe the American people don’t have the fortitude to revolt.
Liberals use their spare time by banning straws, waging war on cow farts and banning meat... Republicans use their spare time, learning how to shoot better.. If a civil war did breakout, it will be over in three seconds.. 🐱
@@Ninnjette- what would be the cause of the civil war? Lmao
so funny, she makes her allegations and she knows the processes, but she doesn’t allow him to explain or explain because she doesn’t want the american people to understand the process, she just keeps doing all she can to interject and confuse issues. She doesn’t fool me.
He literally claimed that he didn’t even review the evidence in Mueller’s investigation personally. That is the most insane, farcical claim I could possibly imagine when it is arguably the most important legal event in the history of the United States. Barr is an absolute clown. It is also a lie, and will be shown as such if justice prevails.
agentanaranjado Democrats may have turned Congress into a three ring circus, but I really don’t think it’s apt to call Attorney General William Barr a clown
Matt The problem is that you are thinking in terms of sides and parties. We all need to stop this.
Objectively consider what he is saying: he is literally saying that he, the top law enforcement entity, didn’t care to review the details of an investigation of the President of the United States for a reason he never elaborates. If ANYONE is investigating the POTUS (or even anyone else of stature, for that matter!) you would clearly review that! Why is he lying here?
I like how he would politely stop answering and just let Kamala keep babbling and making herself look like an idiot.
Hello Elisabeth,I am completely unbiased in your politics, (I am British)I but I have to say that it is clear to a neutral observer;that William Barr is attempting to conceal dishonesty,and obfuscate his way through this hearing here.Surely,all he had to do, was to answer her questions honestly;he doesn't, so Kamala Harris intellectually gelds him as a result, in order to expose his deceit. In the process he also make himself look extremely stupid, and further, show cases her obviously, impressive, cognitive abilities.From my neutral perspective ,i like honesty, and cannot blame Ms Harris for seeking the truth;she has nothing to hide here, he clearly has,so it is William Barr who is trying to fool you, and not Kamala Harris . to my mind from your comment , he seems to have done a pretty good job of doing so already .
Her face expressions while listening cracks me up she calls bullshit with her face expressions everytime he speaks lol its hilarious
That’s her Superpower ❤
Watching the facial expressions of the woman behind her always makes my day.
I noticed that too.
She clearly is very perplexed by the inexplicable arguments and lame defenses coming across the lips of none other than America's chief law enforcement officer.
God help us all.
@@michaelt2053 Spoken like a true ignoramus. Good job.
@@flyingmonkeyknat ,
You trumpers are so adorable when you feign attack mode with your cute little ad hominem invectives.
Watching booker amusing too
@@michaelt2053 I think u just try to come off smart to sell you're bs ideas to yourself
That entire line of questioning was completely pointless. Literally undermining the report they so desperately asked for
I couldn’t disagree more. She is running for president.That and that alone was the point.
She always asks ridiculous questions that have no basis in logic in an attempt to create some contrived scandal where there is none because she has nothing!
Lol so they would review the evidence supporting the report that took 2 years to gather? 🤡🤪 what a bitch! She questioned Judge Kavanaugh in the same manner 😳🤡. What a clown! 🤡
On her best day, she couldn’t effectively cross examine a teenager.
They fear her, she is a strong storm!
She’s a maniacal beeatch.
Chuck Hahn cry some more 😂
random person truth hurts eh?
@@No3Jacks you're scared?
random person damn right I’m scared. I’m scared if Biden that old geezer will croak or be committed leaving that Hillary wannabe in charge. I’ll admit to being scared of that. She’s a nasty power hungry bitch that will say or do anything to get her way.
I thinks it's time for Kamala to address the homelessness in her district, instead of chasing tails on this witch hunt
She's a senator, she doesn't have a district. Duh.
@@LearningEngineercom you're correct, I meant her state! Thx! Pretty sure Biden's election may have sunk with her as vice! If that info is true...
@Joshua king yes sir! She is quite a hypocrite!
What a dumpass.
You #1
Bart white
You are gullible to believe that. Trump is innocent he is not so uncllean so dirty so treacherous Treason tRUMP.
When i charge is presented to a judge or DA for prosecution, does the Judge interview all the neighbors, witnesses etc or does he assume that what is in the police report accurate? Duh!
Are you talking about a 2 year long extremely thorough investigation
And going over thousands of documents and speaking with hundreds of people
lol she's gonna do ANYTHING she can to just make barr look bad. she might as well have asked "did you do ANYTHING at all to prevent the actions on 9/11/2001? YES OR NO THATS A YES OR NO QUESTION!!!! ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!"
@@kidfunkyfri3308 DID YOU TRIPPLE CHECK ALL THE DOCUMENTS IN THE ENTIRE REPORT AFTER OTHERS HAD CHECKED CHECKED AND RECHECKED????? THEN YOU MUST HAVE MISSED SOMETHING! lol that's her whole argument here. unreal.
Except in this case, there WAS NO CHARGE presented. So they are demanding a proof that something is not in evidence, which is a logical fallacy. Furthermore, we are all considered innocent until PROVEN guilty in the US Justice System.
She always trying to talk down to people!
As it should be, he’s a fucking idiot
Doesn’t take much work with him
@@simongill4715 hahahahaha. yeah she made him look bad didnt she liberal?? lmao.. read the law on the office of the special counsel.. evidently that loserette didnt hahahaha. barr is stumbling because he's thinking "why the hail is she asking me these dumbazz questions????!!! .
@@portbizz no hes stumbling because she, rightfully, accused him of not looking at the actual evidence and giving trump a free card, you moron. Thats literally what being corrupt is.
@@simongill4715 and the pot called the kettle black 😐
...Kamala Talking
About Evidence.
Lol.lmao bahahahahahaaha
Why have these hearings? Nothing ever gets accomplished.
Because half of the senators are running for president in 2020 and this is free publicity . Not necessarily good publicity if the watchers/listeners are clear thinking individuals but publicity nonetheless.
phukit because Spartacus needs as much of an audience as possible to show off his bravery.
Good Question 😂🤣
A lot of global warming gets done.
I understand being critical but CHRIST this is just straight-up disrespectful.
@tiredofpc K, shilling? Did you even watch the video? There isn't enough evidence in Mueller's report to prosecute. What other decision could he have made?
If you're a real person, please read up on this investigation. Otherwise, get outta here, troll.
Shilling how? Muller report says no collusion Barr reports its and he is shilling?
Jason Arnold Barr didn't read the report
Nick P. Cage that is not what the report says.
Kamala and Booker are two of the biggest ding dongs ever..,reminds me of the kavanaugh crap again.. these buttholes are always trying to make something out of nothing.. I’m embarrassed for America these two are US senators.
Kamala couldn't cross examine her way out of a paper bag
😂🙌🏻
But boy she is pretentious!
But she just kicked his ass right? 😂
@@LITO_FREDO
Did she?:)
@@g.harris ohhh yeah😁💯👍🏼
Senator Booker looks like a kid in law school for the first day and was able to prove a classmate was lying during an interrogation exercise. LMAO 🤣 🤣 🤣
They don’t know they are stupid. Bless their hearts.
All this nonsense coming from the same woman who set up the Jussie Smollett Fake Lynching
'Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.'__Mark Twain
@Sauron Merciful
I take it you're a paid Fake News Shill...
On the contrary; they think WE'RE stupid
fattyjaybird unfortunately there are plenty of stupid folks out there who buy into this stuff . If you say something enough times people believe it . Well stupid people . The same ones who will vote for the empty vessel Biden
Dems:"We need to investigate the investigation on how it was investigated."
Republicans:"Sorry Dems, we're going to investigate the phony investigation to unseat a sitting president.
I'm sorry you missed the whole point of her questions. Better luck next time.
@@johnvanamburg5081 I understood the point of her questions quite clearly. She was grandstanding. She wants people to think shes so smart. I want to know why she thinks the AG should investigate the investigation that took 2 and a half years to investigate. It is not his job to do that. It is his job to take the report that Mueller gave him and make a decision based on the facts in that report. I don't get why that concept is so hard to understand. You would think a former prosecutor would get it.
John Van Amburg don’t waste your time in the comments.
@@rhondarudolph4603 Hi Rhonda, no, I don't think you understood the point of her questions at all. Mr. Barr put out a statement to the media that "the evidence" did not support a charge of obstruction of justice. Kamala got Mr. Barr to admit he never actually reviewed "the evidence" before issuing that statement. That's the point.
vilan sun yikes
She has such a horrible sound that comes from her mouth. I think it’s her voice.
DAVID, your master told you to hate her, you look but can't find much to inspire this hate so you make stuff up.
@@gareygordon1407 lmao no one needs to be told to hate her, she’s an evil ignorant person.
Arielle Osborne well guess what sparky? She’s now the VP of the USA. Get rekt!
@@TombRaider666 You too. There was a time in Trump's campaign where he instructed you all to hate her. If you honestly think she is evil, i wonder what you would say about Trump. The man did so many evil things during his short four years that even God had to send covid to help remove him from office.
@@SteveDeNiro hope it goes well for you.
So many men in these comments saying something about her interrupting them, like they haven’t been interrupting women for years 🙄
Oh cry me a fucking river! She was trying to make something out of nothing the whole time! She was full of shit! It was proven! She was also trying to be a smart ass
Out talked by a woman??? Wtf are you even talking about?? 😂 you liberals create issues that people aren’t even thinking of or worried about!
@@bextyler551 I don’t care about “sexism” so who gives a shit.....imagine she was trying to make something out of nothing and now here you are doing the same! You liberals just have to have something to feel “oppressed” about so someone will feel sorry for you and give you attention
@@bextyler551 name one right he took away! I’ll wait
@@bextyler551 besides how tf did Trump get pulled into this?? Haha I swear you liberals are obsessed
finally someone who made Kamala clearly seen to be what she is
STUPDI BITCH SMIRKING ALL THE TIME AND LOOK FULL OF CONTEMPT,
THIS IS So FUCKD UP
NO he did NOT !
You are a Moron
@@petrkovalich5796 - look at your ugly soyboy face and get out.
She don't take no mess !!!
What is she?
If she stupid Rosenstein was in charge of Mueller before the AG was appointed her questions don’t make sense
She's trying so hard to spin the truth. She knows Mueller found 0% of evidence to charge Trump with any crime. Why not investigate Clinton, which there is so much evidence its ridiculous that she committed numerous crimes?
Danyel moore are you dump ? I think 🤔 its dumb dummy
@@doctorsmyth8819 loL! 😂😂
MY GOODNESS, HOW HARD IS IT TO ANSWER A QUESTION...JUST LIKE KAVANAUGH....W O W .
She just isn't smart enough for a "gotcha" question against Barr.
He's not smart enough to give a straight answer... hater
@Scott Weaver neither are you or trump simpleton
Seems to me she was right in her questioning of Barr. He was corrupt, and she knew it. Now, all Americans, who are sane, know it!!!
So tell me she lying or he lying. I think I no the answer
@johnjenkins5762 The drunk one is lying.
She's an attorney this was a good stand off
Who's here after Biden chooses Kamala Harris as VP
I am! Well done, KHarris!
She's going to clean Pence's clock in the Debate, he's probably going to try to find a way to cancel it now.
Porter Venn I doubt it. She has a lot of dirt that will come out.
I'm here to assess the character of a possible 1st woman Vice President. In 1984 I believed that Geraldine Ferraro would make a good Vice President.
What a smart lady... Such grace...and then you got this troglodyte in a tie.
he does look like Fred Flintstone.
Duh, it really is Fred Flintstone, rofl. that was too funny and sooo true.
Kamala I feel bad intention in your speech, can’t believe
You ask respect while you talking but never respect ,¿ that’s the elected VP ??
We're fucked
She isn't elect and neither is Biden. They are both going to the big house, just keep the popcorn at the ready.
@Mr. Sexman Laugh it up hippy, I cannot wait to see the look on your face when it all goes down, like Kamala in in her 'Call girl' days in 1994!
@@Galactic_Warrior Nah fam Congress approved the votes and everything suck it up lmao.
That constant smug grin on her face is vomit inducing.
Tulsi smacked that right off of her face.
Bookers too! He’s laughing and smirking next to her the whole time
And what about Bookers dipshit ass smiling to.... these liberals are so sickening
A tactic - very effective 😂
She’s brilliant you sad fucker
She constantly expected him to never interrupt her, yet she got to interrupt him all she wanted to, even when he was needing to think about how to answer her questions. It was disgusting. She was really snide as well.
fool thinks it makes her look smart.
Exactly. When she pauses then Barr would rebut she would interrupt him with "i'm not finished". It's quite a pathetic tactic to degrade your opposition.
Donna Knudson with all due respect if you know the truth you don’t need to think about the question... you simply answer with the truth... even if the truth is not the answer they want to hear
Fernando padilla it is more of HOW to answer. These fools twist and manipulate words all the damn time. She isn’t quite as foolish as AOC, but foolish nonetheless.
Steven Gravelle I see what you mean. But also, if it’s a yes or no answer it should be pretty straight forward. I see where your coming from though
Does anyone think AG Barr looks like John Goodman or Fred Flintstone? 😂😂
Yes he does lol
Watching two attorney generals go against each other will never not be funny to me
Isn't this supposed to be a hearing? Why aren't they letting him answer questions... What's the point of even having him there
you fucking idiot they let him speak and he couldnt say shit, open your eyez
He was given ample time.
@@mrsmith7936 they didnr let him speak. Republicans let him speak when they could. Make no mistake. The A.G. is no idiot. Them dems launched an attack full force on him. He held his own most would have lost their temper way before he did. Most keyboard warriors would have wet seats at a house judiciary committee "testimony " was more like a witchhunt.
He isn't giving answers just excuses
@@mrsmith7936 You are already extinct, you ignorant, arrogant lemming.
Keep your head up your butt.
You're making all this winning far too easy.
Thank you.
What they want to know is, are they under investigation.
and the answer is yup, i forsee some dems that dont have any clue that they are in trouble when Barr and the prosecuter get done looking at how the dems cheated, lied, and all the illegal crap they did they are all scared and if you dont think so think again
now that the mueller testimony is over...Barr is gonna make some heads roll...indictments forthcoming
At this point I had no idea who Kamala Harris Was
Such a bitch
Gotta love how she asks a multi-part question then wants a YES/NO answer. It's sad to see this person is a heartbeat from the Presidency with her attitude.
i always thought the VICE PRESIDENT was a heart [beat] from the president check your history notes first.. not the AG
Actually Kamala is pretty damn good - she wants the truth to be known...just like rest of America does.
🇺🇸👍
@@raybin6873 Democrats and the truth are an oxymoronic combo
I'd rather see a Trump vs. Karamela Harris debate. Pay back will be a beeyatch.
No, SHE'S the "beeyatch".
AOC & KAMALA look like and act like MOTHER & DAUGHTER, did she secretly give birth somewhere? Trump would love the debate against Karmel
@@alexlowe895 no, he wouldn't.
She'll leave trump playing with his fingers.
My money on Trump
I'd like to see a Gowdy Harris interogation.
Breaking news: clown show continues; Russia laughing
+Kosm _ ~ Rolling in the floor. They got what they paid for and some more. That money all those boys on the right took from the NRA came from Russia. You’re right on point.
Mademoiselle Minou oh no! That must have been in the Mueller report and I totally missed it! What page was that on exactly?
You may want to move to rus sia inbred
You TDS is showing 😆😆
Daniel Perez I just want to know what page of the Mueller report the evidence of collusion is on! Please help! I am severely inbred and my brain don’t think right
Anyone: Starts talking
Kamala: heheheyeyeHEHEHEHEYEUE
I wish, just once, AG Barr would have said, "EXCUSE ME I'M SPEAKING!" when she repeatedly spoke over him as he was trying to answer a question.
HAHAHA. I've been saying for a long time that I wish somehow someway ben carson could end up in front of one of her committees. i guarantee you if she says it too many times.. he would say it back to her. LMAO!!!
Ben Carson is such a gentleman that would be HILARIOUS! I would LOVE that!
the constitution grants her that privilege. STFU.
Can I finish?!? Can I finish?!?...... okay, I'm finished.
JordonTheo love a South Park fan
JordonTheo she's trying To Be significant. *Epic Fail* 👍😅🤣😄😅😂😂😂😂👍
She's southern canadian
Must be Canadian
I love South Park
Everyone has been promised a seat at the adults table if they can overthrow the potus
AB: The partitioned gymnasiums would have to overthrow the packed stadiums first
OR at least get Barr removed from pursuing an ACTUAL investigation into their ACTUAL crimes!
hows the tinfoil going
A B- Exactly, AOC is a prime example.
Can't remember nothing Harris asked Bill Barr 😞
When answering a snake that has been thinking how to screw you for a long time you need to take your time answering a snake
you should take your time creating a sentence buddy. you might need some commas and a grammar book.
@@oliverpizzoccaro1249 bingo now you can be incompintent under a Vail of punctuation lol
@@69goldtop14 I think you meant incompetent, but idk. Rephrase please
@@oliverpizzoccaro1249 I'll let you work on that you think your belittling someone but it just shows your ignorance
I was hoping that he would respond "we can have that conversation" just for a laugh
vegomatic100 A full throated conversation... lol
Booker’s face alone is straight comedy.
Reminds me of Scooby & Shaggy 😆
He IS Spartacus!
Hahaha very funny lol 😂
All 3 of them look like a comedy show and the ring leader in this 🎪 and that's Kamala Harris! Kamala why don't u ask how many are involved in the Russian Hoax? Obama,,Biden,,Hillary,,Comey,,Muller etc Christopher Wray u name it
@@micheledenise2305 awww you maddddd that’s the Vice President of the USA 😂😂😂 she will be remembered for decades she’s iconic asf lmao and you lmao well you will be forgotten just as you are now 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😝 silly European
Ret roh!
I didn't know who Kamala was during this hearing but seeing this again reminds me how much she pissed me off, not letting Bill talk.
Harris needs to learn the difference between "inferred" and "implied" if she's going to play snarky tough cop.
I would like to see how Kamala Harris would question Christopher Steele about the credibility of his Dossier and his sources?
Deflect much?
No shit... That Barr is a man of honor! I like the way he immediately starts pointing the finger at other people when things get hot!! Just like The Donald!! GO TRUMP!!
@@imutau bwahahaha, you know how stupid you are?
@@imutau yes it's deflecting to point out that's the Democratic party paid Russia to try to frame Trump.
Its Mueller's job to check the evidence and Barrs job to prosecute or not.. She know
she should of said "sir im speaking im speaking"😂
billy boi barr is talking, KH is speaking. Classic SNL.
As for Kamala.."Some people are perceived as idiots until they open their mouth and remove all doubt. "
Ladies and gentlemen, the next Mad Maxine Waters...
? lel
Ah hahahahaha! so true
Kel Lee , spoken like a true Democratic. Your ignorance is only out shadowed bye your childish behavior. Truly pathetic. 🤦♂️
@@Chickenchummer hey. go easy on him man. he can't help that he was born with a small penis, lack of testosterone levels, overly emotional feelings and an overall sensitive mind. cmon now...stop being mean! He can't help that his brain isn't fully developed therefore he votes with his emotions and not on the issues. that was mean! lay off him man! he's fragile!!
dan Richardson
Keep the GREEN Kool-AID flowing!
Like he’s supposed to do his own investigation? God help us.
He is supposed to read
pavanatanaya, read a report based on a fake and sham of an investigation? The Democrats are about to get their crap sandwich handed right back into their faces!
nonsense15 how many guilty pleas?.....uh huh
@Carl Lennen Amen!
So what was HE DOING FOR 3 WEEKS? rOAd mAp To IMpeEchMent, reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
lol I wish someone would say to her “Wait im not finished” when she interrupts them too
True.. such arrogance
@@jenjose28 well i would not define it as arrogance. the constitution grants her a certain amount of time within which she can do whatever she wants, such as interrupting any witnesses.
Well they clearly don’t stick to simply answering the questions. They have limited time and they purposely do this to make sure few questions can be asked.
Men have been doing this to women for years?? But all of a sudden it isn’t okay because a woman of color is doing it? Okay. smarten the fuck up 🙄🙄
4 years of incompetency & its over finally. Wouldn't you agree?!
In general, Kamala is asking if Barr reviewed evidence that the Mueller's report, in a way is undermining Mueller's integrity.
Yeah, that is not his job.
Actually, it is his (and any prosecutor or judge's) job to review evidence in any charging decision. You can't base a decision to charge or not charge without having reviewed the evidence. If Barr was like a judge in a speeding ticket case, everyone would have to pay the speeding ticket even if there was evidence on traffic cams showing the driver to be safe. He is essentially ignoring the traffic cam footage figuratively, but saying that he based his decision on the footage. Him reviewing the evidence is simply what attorneys are supposed to do, it's a basic function as an attorney, it does not in any way undermine mueller's credibility, it simply gives him further reason to support or accept his conclusions when he understands why those conclusions in the report were reached. He did not perform a basic function that is essential to any charging decision.
In your example of being a judge of a speeding case.
The judge was presented with an official authority detailed investigative report on the footage, time stamp by time stamp, event by event (thus 35mil research using up tons of manpower by Mueller); it will not be far off base to judge base on the report since it has been factually check by an official authority.
Back to this case, if having to verify the authenticity of the report, it would mean an additional 35mil USD for AG Barr to speak to those witness, review evidence again. It will mean that it should be an AG Barr report and not Mueller report.
It's all just an effort to buy time and try a different tactic to destroy Trump. No one with any sense (and certainly not Barr) is fooled by what's happening here.
@@sarenadelgado7608 if it was the other way around all these people would be pointing out exactly what you're pointing out right now they're not stupid they're just racist
At the very least she didn't bark about "reclaiming my time". Still wouldn't let him answer but with more finesse.
Barr should end every hearing with “I wish I could reclaim the past hour of my life because this was a waste of time”.
joseph banks or instead of acting like a bag of rocks maybe he should answer the questions truthfully since he is supposed to be the top legal person in the US.
she looks like Mr. Horse from Ren & Stimpy
She nailed Barr - just as she should have !!
She is so incredibly disrespectful and condescending. Not paying attention to any of his answers and rifling through her papers, telling Barr “I’m not finished when he tries to answer”, interrupting Barr anytime he has an answer and smiling/giggling its honestly embarrassing to watch.
Good job Ms. Harris, It’s very hard to find Good, Honest Ones like yourself in the ugly world. May The Lord Bless You and Keep You in His Heart . 🙏
Like she wants to question someone on ethics
Trump doesn't follow rule of law and you talk about ethics? That's hilarious!
@@claytongunter2450 Tell me what laws he broke if you don't mind?
Clayton Gunter if he broke laws he wouldn’t be in office right? isn’t that how it works? or are you just stupid?
Clayton Gunter you got a response idiot or you crawl back into your hole?
Clayton Gunter what kind of person hold evidence of a inmate on death row that proves he didn’t do it until she is forced to release it. She is a piece of crap
if there is any "underlying evidence" the "investigation" would not be finished and the "report" would not be on the AG"s desk.
Kel Lee to save the names of intelligence officers who are under cover, as per the CIA and military branches.
Congress has access to the report with 99% un-redacted. They didn’t find any issues with it.
Kampala’s a sick dems
@Meadow Apple that's completely untrue there were multiple instances in which he found trump could be charged but he left that decision to to barr. He even wrote a letter to barr about how he was wrong to just dismiss everything the way he did.
@Kel Lee What evidence? The Steele dossier that Hillary paid for? Remember, James Comey assured us that the Steele dossier, contrary to testimony of his subordinate Andrew McCabe (already facing criminal referrals) was not the chief evidence presented to a FISA court.
That was a lie. And if it is not, Comey’s other evidence he presented is likely to be compromised.
1) his submitted dossier evidence was compiled by a contractor paid by Hillary Clinton;
2) that ex-British spy Christopher Steele’s work was unverified;
3) that Steele’s relationship with Comey’s FBI has already been severed due to Steele’s unprofessional behavior;
4) that submitted news accounts of “collusion” were in circular fashion based on the dossier itself.
Comey likely also lied in telling Trump he wanted to brief him on the dossier in worries that the press might otherwise report on it first.
In fact, his meeting with Trump by design was the necessary imprimatur the press had been waiting for to leak information from the dossier, which shortly followed. So keep telling yourself that the "evidence" is there and someone is hiding it from you. You sound just like the birthers from 8 years ago.
@Kel Lee to protect the innocent involved in the investigation and avoid revealing matters which may negatively impact national security.
I see a lot of comments about her sounding intelligent.
Please remember, she didn't write those questions. She can't take her eyes off her notes.
When she is making speeches now and she's cackling, you will notice she isn't looking at the speech. That's her natural demeanor.
I WANT CLIPS AS HER AS A JUDGE!! Everyone found guilty as she presided should get an APPEAL!! Who thinks her IQ breaks 100? Oh I am a TOUGH BROAD, made even worse that I do not know the LAW!!
"I'm not finished".........but doesn't even let Barr respond. What a completely rude, disaster of a Senator
Yep. She just uses her power in Congress to shove words into people's mouths and intimidate them. How she got Senator I will never know.
@@michaelg1532 Brainwashed citizens of the United State Of America. Hahaha public enemies.
The walls are closing on them and they're freaking out
Barr and Trump? Yes. Barr is a chicken shit traitor, and Trump is a wannabe king. Both will be held accountable.
@@apolloscrow3686 I don't blame the Dems for freaking out! The party has done nothing in the last 2 years and are in it's final throws of death.
Are you seriously delusional enough to think that the Democratic Party is dying? I think its quite the contrary. I used to vote republican until Trump tainted the party, and every republican was too weak to stand up for the true values of the party. Now I have to accept the fact that what was once my party (and Im assuming yours) is going to be nothing but a greasy shit stain on the pages of American history.@@TheGregHeff
@@apolloscrow3686 Nobody is being held accountable, for what? Running a great country! You must be living in one of those Pot-Head Harris hallucinogenic states! The fact that you even think you have even a slight chance at wining 2020, is like saying the Ants can overcome the boots, that step on them! ..but good luck! Ha! "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" #JustTrumpEm
@@apolloscrow3686 i know you live in your echo chamber, but look at the like/dislike of the comments. you should make an effort to get out and see other peoples views. you're only repeating the same old tired ass shit that the msm has been feeding you. over 2 years of "russia russia russia" should have been at least SOME kinda of red flag that they're lying to you.
LoL absolutely unbelievable....who's driving this bus????
Funny how back then she kinda sounded a bit smarter, but now all she does is cackle.
Somehow, I can never think of the rise to the top of Kamala Harris without thinking of Willie Brown.
"Heels up Harris"
You're a simp so of course you wouldn't. 😷
Forget about "grassroots", turns out she's the earliest *Tupac fan* ever in history!
Maybe U should seek professional help about that. Lol
You meant you wanted Kamala to be a virgin?
He laughed at her........ lol
She is deserving of CONTEMPT, laughter is a healthy response to her lies and attempts to accuse him of wrongdoing in contradiction to FACTS ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE aka the publicly released Mueller Report
Because he thinks he is racially superior....
Childish and immature right? I feel like if he were half as respectable as he thinks he is, he could at least take this shit seriously. This isn't a joke no matter how 'ridiculous' it might be.
@@amylieu6084 - People saying shit like you did just then is exactly why Trump won back in 2016, and why he'll be reelected in 2020. I hope you're pleased with yourself :D
@Nipha Ahtlantashah Dumb ass fuck
I tot hit in the head with an ice pick which caused me to have a stroke because I was protecting both party's from harm lucky on me, not lucky to my head that caused all the damage to having a stroke when I was the age of 32 and for 10 years I been waiting on payment due to victims of crime.
If I’m understanding her correctly, did she think Barr was going to do his own investigation of Muellers findings? I could have misunderstood.
Give me 2 1/2 years plus the $25,000,000 and I'll review that evidence for you
We can't we spent it all on investigating Hillary's emails. We barely had enough after Starr and after the 6 years of investigating her husband.
IM * UTAU
Not really. That was decades ago. Since then we’ve funded border walls for other countries.
We have no funds to protect our country.
I’m sure you’re going to need some help so, I’m available for a minimal fee.
+Diane M - Sadly Diane walls keep you in too. There is so much concentration on the southern border that the northern border is being neglected. What are they going to do, fence us all in? They already have kids I mean kids dying in cages no matter where they come from. It’s not right. I m tired of living in fear. People calling the police on you for nothing. People won’t speak to you if you don’t look like them. Hell people won’t speak to you if you look like ‘em either. This is just too chaotic for me. I’ve got about $90,000 in savings and I know it’s not much, but if things don’t change I’m out. I can’t take much more of it. I have a granddaughter, I don’t want her to get shot at school or church.
I will do it for free in one hour: NO COLLUSION, NO CORRUPTION, thank you very much! As Axetruth on UA-cam would say: IT'S OVA HOE!