All creators have access to the UA-cam Audio Library. Creator Music is available to all YPP creators in the U.S.! With Creator Music, you'll have access to everything in the UA-cam Audio Library, AND recognizable songs for use in your videos. We’re constantly expanding the catalog, so check back periodically to see what new tracks are available.
Unfortunately, the restrictions on music use are getting unbearable. I'm finding that Twitter, Instagram, and Tiktok are WAY easier for an artist to create short music-themed animations. In a world where I can use nearly any song on Spotify (instagram and tiktok), why would I go to a world where my channel gets a threat and strike (youtube)? PLEASE evolve to become more like IG and Tiktok by providing regular music on UA-cam Shorts. Part of culture involves using music that others make. That's how art evolves, grows, and changes over time (look at folk music for an example).
Thanks 🌷 UA-cam great option now viewers can add or remove copyrighted area in thier video, & can add new music on copyrighted area easily to remove copyright, thanks❤❤🌷
UA-cam, you should have shared revenue with the owner of the music, and don’t take it down because is free advertising for any content creators to promote their music.
Because Music Publishers and the big "Music" producers are the most short sited business' around. Right now they have an agreement with YT to take all of your ad money on a video and to pool a percentage of YT shorts money. All which actually discourages the use of their music. So in their greed they are actually minimizing their potential profits. In stead they should come to a fair and equitable system between the content creators, YT and the Publishers so that everyone can maximize their profit. This will actually spare the legitimate use of the music and everyone will be richer.
Thanks but I still don't feel safe knowing the automated content ID could claim a legitimate video of mine. I've got a cover with another artist of "Dust in the Wind" by Kansas on my collaborators' channel. The content ID is claimed to another person's cover, I have had no luck removing it as the claimant has ignored us.
Thanks for the information. Could you do a video on getting un shadow banned? My channel was clearly hidden. You can see it in the analytics. I have 2 other channels that have not been shadow banned so I have proof. How do I get un shadow banned?
UA-cam claims they don't shadow ban at all. I think this requires doing a little searching as it obviously does happen somehow whether it be by bot or AI or manual review, it obviously does happen.
Why do I lose my copyright rights for the entirety of the video and give it to the music owner? I shouldn’t lose my own video rights because of some incidental music, it is unfair to lose the ENTIRE video monetisation in a 10 minute video and give it to someone else just because there is a few seconds of music in it. Shouldn’t it be divided up so if the music takes up 0.05% of the video, the music owner gets 0.05% of the earnings, that would then be FAIR.
There is a reason you lose monitization. The music companies have threatened to sue UA-cam as well as the creators if UA-cam doesn't do what they've done. Even though they're a safe harbour, the music companies are EXTREMELY litigious. If you don't want the to take away what is demanded you can always fight this in a court of law. This losing of monitization is the compromise that UA-cam came up with The new system with creator music will now cost you money willingly by purchasing licences and this will come out of your revenue as you get monitization. The music companies will make bank off of this as many of these licences will auto renew
Don't forget third-party audio libraries as well. There are a whole bunch of sites that will give you access to thousands of tracks for a simple monthly or annual fee and you can then use those tracks on your videos (usually in perpetuity) without further fees or charges and without risk of a copyright claim/strike.
Are there any you’d recommend? I’ve always wondered what happens if you stop subscribing to those sites, do you then have to remove the previously uploaded videos?
@@BikingChap Most of them grant a perpetual license for videos you've made while subscribing so if you stop subscribing you're still okay. Be careful though because I believe some do only offer temporary licenses and will claim videos if you unsub. I chose Audiio because they have a great deal for the first year and do offer perpetual licenses.
I have had a copyright-problem some month ago. I used a self created song in the background of a tutorial. The notes were taken from Beethoven, it was the 5th symphony. I created the music by taking my software-synthesizers. The music was taken to a very low volume, so my voice in the tutorial is the thing that should be heard. UA-cam named a guy or company named "Latin Author perf" that had the rights for this music, but the notes are public domain cause old german componists are long dead and there are no living people who can have the rights. It took some weeks, and latin Author did not react on the mails he got from youtube. But it should be taken into the listening algorythm to be nice to people using very low volume in backgrounds, and much more nice to people using old masters compositions.
I had the same notice while uploading a video with classical music in the background. I wondered how Mozart was still getting royalties on his music after so long. I thought that the person who recorded it was the one to claim rights on their rendition. However, if you made your own redition, then the problem is deeper. Maybe their algorithm had a hard time making a difference between yours and some copyrighted rendition.
Why can't you just allow for copyrighted content to earn a percentage of the content creator's monetization so we won't have to deal with all this. We appreciate the free effects and music, (since a lot of third party platforms are charging for those services). But PLEASE arrange for split monetization of copyrighted content, AND active systems that allow for us to petition false claims.
Many artists/labels allow channels to use their music with ads, If they do you just get a message from UA-cam saying ”this is not a warning, this does not affect your channels status”. Etc. But, it does…? It can stil be a issue for channels if they want to monetize the channel later and have these copyright claims. Even if the owner allows it. Why not mention this? At least this happened to one of my channels (another channel), but you didn’t say in any mail that this could happen. You just said that everything was fine and that I could keep it up on UA-cam. And it was fine… Until I got 1000 subs and wanted to monetize the channel myself 😏 The whole channel got demonitized, and not just the uploads with copyright music (that was stil ”fine” to keep, with ads). You could at least mention this in these messages? I cant remember any of that. So now I have a channel that had one million views and UA-cam/labels takes 100 % of all ad revenue. I have no issue that the owners earns more money then me, they should! But I dont think its fair to demonitize whole channels while saying everything is fine, and then take 100 % ad revenues from these channels. I didnt uploaded whole albums or anything, most of it was live stuff with bands that I know have nothing against sharing live bootlegs. But I moved on and started a new channel. Stil have the old one though, so UA-cam can earn ”their” money 👍Today I allow people using my own tracks as long as they don’t sell it. I dont want their whole channels getting demonitized just because of this though! But I cant really guarantee that UA-cam decide something else (because of the copyright claims they stil can get if I release the music). I guess this is out of my control, even if I am the owner of these tracks and not UA-cam! Or is it a way to guarantee that the copyright claims wont be a issue if people share my tracks the way I allow it? (And stil having ad revenue from content ID)
We see on Instagram and Tik Tok people constantly using famous songs of famous artists all the time. We assume that Instagram and Tik Tok has an arrangement with the Creators and with the famous artists where they each receive a split in revenue created? Is this correct? If so why doesn't UA-cam do the same? Seems like UA-cam is a bit of a slow Dinosaur in this regard
I have had two short videos in which I used music from the UA-cam library which were flagged as copyright. One song was “watermelon sugar”, and the other was a techno song. Can you explain why this happened?
Same the video was 14 seconds and got flagged this happened multiple times even a video with non copyrighted basic audio from a known non copyright free source was flagged, my voice was flagged during a video in which I narrated and comments removed, when previously it had not been, it's scary not knowing what to do and trying so hard to follow the rules and still have this happen, honestly it's discouraging is specially when you're at a stage of building conference.
I just searched for the watermelon sugar song and it doesn't show in the Audio Library at all. As it is I am wondering if it was a song you had to attribute. In the Audio Library there are songs that have the UA-cam symbol and require no attribution and others that say "CC" - the non attribution songs seem to have a higher level of restriction and the one's that need attribution don't. I'm also wondering if I create shorts on my alt, that if I should use more recent music as opposed to stuff from 10 years ago
I've used short shelf music on previous videos within the UA-cam app, no third party, and still received copyright claims, also the audio library isn't updated very often as far as I've been noticing the same audio for months hence it's a bit difficult to find fresh tracks in the audio library, I appreciate the clarification and the current options available but sometimes it can still be difficult to find fresh music and or shorts music that won't get a content ID claim regardless of following instructions, I hope adjustments are made so that the system doesn't falsely flag or claim audio via upload as it's quite nerve rattling not knowing what will happen upon upload and or having even you're speaking voice flagged zero profanity spoken yet this still occurred due to sensitive ID scanning systems etc.
It doesn't make any sense for your ENTIRE video to get demonetized because of a few seconds of copyrighted music. The copyright holder should get a cut of the revenue relative to how much that part of the video is watched compared to the rest of the video.
It's laughable the number of times you hear about channels that get UA-cam strikes on their own music 🙄 UA-cam is a time and energy waster on that sort of thing, not to mention the distress it causes.
What if creators of the music in youtube audio library suddenly change their copyright policy? Will this get people who use their music in trouble? Is changing the policy like that even possible? Because I've heard of people getting claimed for using music in youtube audio library. What's up with that?
So there is an app called sing where you can make a new video of you singing versions of songs and uploading it to UA-cam. How does this work with a copyright?
❤Thank you for this BUT when ever i UPLOAD Shorts with Free Royalty Library Music , Shorts Don't go viral even if The Video is not BOring 😢 , Dont know how but im not the only one experimented this issue😂 ,But Hey thanks we need more educational vids like this one for heads up
ماذا عن استخدام موسيقى قنوات أخرى عن طريق البحث اثناء رفع فيديو قصير؟ هل يخالف ام ان الارباح تتقاسم معه؟ طبعا اقصد البحث بالموسيقى الرائجة اثناء رفع فيديو الشورتس وليس تحميل هذه الموسيقى مسبقا ووضعها بالفيديو عبر برنامج مونتاج ثم رفعها لليوتيوب...
There is one issue that UA-cam hasn't yet addressed, it would be great to hear back from UA-cam so I know where I stand. I have recently started out on UA-cam, my intent is to upload tutorials and shorts about 3d development. I write my own music and sound fx for all my content, but yet it seems people are free to remix my audio on UA-cam shorts with absolutely no attribution regardless of copyright. Will UA-cam address this glitch, are there any plans for UA-cam to make it possible for me to tag my Music and FX so that my audio is respectfully attributed back to my channel?
@@AnarTheAnarchist My music has copyright attributed to it, and so I fail to understand why UA-cam would allow copyright material to be remixed without attribution or consent. Regardless of policy, copyright law still remains. Maybe I am missing something, and so it would be helpful if UA-cam addressed these concerns.
@@PhotiniByDesign It's the same think that happens on tikTok, the idea is that people using their smartphones to create videos will be able to use this willy nilly. Thing is it's not that great for them as the song ovrwrite and dialogue that the second creator has
There is a box you can untick on the first page of the Studio when you're uploading new videos. By default it is ticked (and allows others to use your audio for shorts) but if you untick that box others can not use your audio and if they already are, their shorts are muted.
What about when your walking in Public and some bar is playing music so loud. That you pick it up while your recording say a travel video? And/or/also what if your doing a food video in a restaurant. Recording what you eat and music is played thru the restaurant? I can not tell the restaurant or bar to turn off the music. Or someone rides by on a bike or car. Playing loud music? That you do not want to hear in the first place?
UA-cam deals a deathblow to companies that monopolize music, a deathblow to game companies, anime, etc... And a decisive deathblow to the content creator who reuses such. We're done and UA-cam is done.
unfortunately, (I have been posting cartoons on youtube since 2006 and was very loyal) I agree with you. I have since transferred to Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter because these platforms, imperfect as they are, usually provide way more creative freedom than YT does. They're losing us in favor of pleasing enormous companies, and I find that sad but inevitable. UNLESS they change their ways and allow culture to flow freely without punishing creators.
1) Why do we use copyright protected songs? We like them and they are much better. 2) We want to share with music lgbels. But can we get in touch with the major labels for permission? No, they don't even answer us.
What if I want to use songs that aren’t in the library for creating music videos where the song is an essential part? I would let the music owners take all the profit if that’s what it took to have artistic freedom, although 50/50 for sonic/visual would seem fair to me. So far NONE of the songs I want are available. I really want to share these amazing songs and my visions with people. :/ What can I do to get permission from artists/labels and permission recognition from UA-cam? Is there any streamlined process or do I have to research and cold call/email artists and labels for every single track? P.s. I wish I could just share a link to a massive Spotify playlist and UA-cam creator music app could just scan it and pull up all available songs. I don’t have time for one by one search. P.s. Would it be legal to upload a silent video and just tell people to play the song on a separate device at the same time? 👀
This idea is so amazing! I would love this. I would be happy to give up my profits too for creative freedom. Because I don't care about $20, I care about making a funny cartoon that fits what I imagine. I don't think permissions and stuff matters, in my experience (have been on YT since 2006). I have even received strikes on my own music and I obviously have permission on myself. It's the record labels that are the issue and they're notoriously difficult to manage. Sad as it may sound, I have found my solution in posting on Twitter and Instagram and TikTok...which allow that creative freedom much more.
Very informative video...I use UA-cam Library music... please add more Islamic backgrounds music for videos so that we can't use it from any other side.
Really good tutorial BUT UA-cam has many flaws that still to this day did non resolve. Like the retroactive copyright claims on older videos. Something like this: I have a small gameplay channel and years ago I made a playthrough of Quake. At the time that I was recording and editing the run, the soundtrack that came with the game was free for everyone and so everything was monetized. Then the pandemic struck, Trent Reznor realized that "Hey, I can make a Vinyl of Quake with the whole OST". Cool, no problem with that. But when your record label starts to screw over the content creators by demonetizing everything or worse, asks the platform to take down some of the videos, that's when you realize that the amount of care, passion or hard work doesn't pay off one bit.
All creators have access to the UA-cam Audio Library. Creator Music is available to all YPP creators in the U.S.! With Creator Music, you'll have access to everything in the UA-cam Audio Library, AND recognizable songs for use in your videos. We’re constantly expanding the catalog, so check back periodically to see what new tracks are available.
Hello UA-cam
❤سلام عليكم
❤❤❤❤
❤
I appreciate this information now I know all I have to do is use it thru the library to avoid this 🙏
Unfortunately, the restrictions on music use are getting unbearable. I'm finding that Twitter, Instagram, and Tiktok are WAY easier for an artist to create short music-themed animations. In a world where I can use nearly any song on Spotify (instagram and tiktok), why would I go to a world where my channel gets a threat and strike (youtube)? PLEASE evolve to become more like IG and Tiktok by providing regular music on UA-cam Shorts. Part of culture involves using music that others make. That's how art evolves, grows, and changes over time (look at folk music for an example).
Or just take some cut for god's sake. UA-cam is extremely annoying for this
but other social networks don't pay like UA-cam
Seriously! thank you for this comment, It is so FRUSTRATING dealing with this outdated music library, come on UA-cam.
Absolutely
Why would you deal with copyright restrictions on YT? I suppose it would depend on who your target audience is.
Me: wow this song sounds nice, I'm going to use it
Copyright:
😊
😂
Fr🥹
Thank you for great explanation
This would be a great video if you fixed the companies making FALSE COPYWRIGHT CLAIMS.
Agree
This!
Just happened to me, on my best preforming long from vid! I disputed the claim. I used a completely different song than Adrev is claiming I used.
Amen
Fr- a content creator took down one of my videos and got me a strike
Please expand the music in your Audio Library! Thank you for the tips
Okay anybody want to take any guesses how many years it is going to take for Creator Music to expand to UA-cam partners outside of the US?
Yes, no mention that not all of us in the YPP can use it . . .
@@ExplainingComputersHey, I want to upload a lyric video for a song and don't need any profit off of it. How do I upload the video and add credits?
Thanks 🌷 UA-cam great option now viewers can add or remove copyrighted area in thier video, & can add new music on copyrighted area easily to remove copyright, thanks❤❤🌷
UA-cam, you should have shared revenue with the owner of the music, and don’t take it down because is free advertising for any content creators to promote their music.
UA-cam content I d
Well said!!
Because Music Publishers and the big "Music" producers are the most short sited business' around. Right now they have an agreement with YT to take all of your ad money on a video and to pool a percentage of YT shorts money. All which actually discourages the use of their music. So in their greed they are actually minimizing their potential profits. In stead they should come to a fair and equitable system between the content creators, YT and the Publishers so that everyone can maximize their profit. This will actually spare the legitimate use of the music and everyone will be richer.
Easy solution
you hope --and I also believe you must cite the author of the music in your post
Thanks but I still don't feel safe knowing the automated content ID could claim a legitimate video of mine. I've got a cover with another artist of "Dust in the Wind" by Kansas on my collaborators' channel. The content ID is claimed to another person's cover, I have had no luck removing it as the claimant has ignored us.
Thanks for the information. Could you do a video on getting un shadow banned? My channel was clearly hidden. You can see it in the analytics. I have 2 other channels that have not been shadow banned so I have proof. How do I get un shadow banned?
UA-cam claims they don't shadow ban at all. I think this requires doing a little searching as it obviously does happen somehow whether it be by bot or AI or manual review, it obviously does happen.
Why do I lose my copyright rights for the entirety of the video and give it to the music owner? I shouldn’t lose my own video rights because of some incidental music, it is unfair to lose the ENTIRE video monetisation in a 10 minute video and give it to someone else just because there is a few seconds of music in it. Shouldn’t it be divided up so if the music takes up 0.05% of the video, the music owner gets 0.05% of the earnings, that would then be FAIR.
There is a reason you lose monitization. The music companies have threatened to sue UA-cam as well as the creators if UA-cam doesn't do what they've done. Even though they're a safe harbour, the music companies are EXTREMELY litigious. If you don't want the to take away what is demanded you can always fight this in a court of law. This losing of monitization is the compromise that UA-cam came up with
The new system with creator music will now cost you money willingly by purchasing licences and this will come out of your revenue as you get monitization. The music companies will make bank off of this as many of these licences will auto renew
Don't forget third-party audio libraries as well. There are a whole bunch of sites that will give you access to thousands of tracks for a simple monthly or annual fee and you can then use those tracks on your videos (usually in perpetuity) without further fees or charges and without risk of a copyright claim/strike.
Are there any you’d recommend? I’ve always wondered what happens if you stop subscribing to those sites, do you then have to remove the previously uploaded videos?
@@BikingChap Most of them grant a perpetual license for videos you've made while subscribing so if you stop subscribing you're still okay. Be careful though because I believe some do only offer temporary licenses and will claim videos if you unsub. I chose Audiio because they have a great deal for the first year and do offer perpetual licenses.
@@xjet thanks so much for replying, it’s a minefield isn’t it?!
@@BikingChap That's for sure... tread carefully 🙂
❤❤
It's Amezing ❤
Thanks, and I give people credit for their music 🎼
Can you tell me how you give credit the creators 🤔
Sure, you can say credit to song artist in the description and in a video
NoCopyrightSounds and Kevin Macleod provide amazing royalty-free music. I'd recommend them any time.
Is he on yt audio library? Thanks!
@@firstmedicalpainrehab There are quite a few tracks from Kevin in the YT audio library, most require attribution for use but they're free.
Much Appreciation
Yes :) ❤
I have had a copyright-problem some month ago.
I used a self created song in the background of a tutorial. The notes were taken from Beethoven, it was the 5th symphony. I created the music by taking my software-synthesizers.
The music was taken to a very low volume, so my voice in the tutorial is the thing that should be heard.
UA-cam named a guy or company named "Latin Author perf" that had the rights for this music, but the notes are public domain cause old german componists are long dead and there are no living people who can have the rights.
It took some weeks, and latin Author did not react on the mails he got from youtube. But it should be taken into the listening algorythm to be nice to people using very low volume in backgrounds, and much more nice to people using old masters compositions.
S
10%
ẞ
Mo
I had the same notice while uploading a video with classical music in the background. I wondered how Mozart was still getting royalties on his music after so long. I thought that the person who recorded it was the one to claim rights on their rendition. However, if you made your own redition, then the problem is deeper. Maybe their algorithm had a hard time making a difference between yours and some copyrighted rendition.
You would need to be a ypp creator for that
What if music from the audio library gets removed from the library then the music becomes copyrighted?
Then you get hit with a copyright take down. It has happened to me more than once. That's why I don't trust UA-cam library
Already happened to me many times. So better use own music, or no music. All those “free libraries” are not reliable
Nice question
Just learning. I once used a song, not from the library, 3 months later I received a mail for copyright claim. I was shocked 😲!
@@RealTechnoPanda wow, that's great -_-
Got to love this out of touch "consult with your layer" advice. It sure comes handy for a small youtuber 😂
What if we're a music creator? How do we submit our music for possible inclusion in the UA-cam Audio Library?
Thanks for this one 🥰🥰🥰
Very nice
Thanks, great video, great help!👍
Why can't you just allow for copyrighted content to earn a percentage of the content creator's monetization so we won't have to deal with all this.
We appreciate the free effects and music, (since a lot of third party platforms are charging for those services).
But PLEASE arrange for split monetization of copyrighted content, AND active systems that allow for us to petition false claims.
Many artists/labels allow channels to use their music with ads, If they do you just get a message from UA-cam saying ”this is not a warning, this does not affect your channels status”. Etc. But, it does…? It can stil be a issue for channels if they want to monetize the channel later and have these copyright claims. Even if the owner allows it.
Why not mention this? At least this happened to one of my channels (another channel), but you didn’t say in any mail that this could happen. You just said that everything was fine and that I could keep it up on UA-cam. And it was fine… Until I got 1000 subs and wanted to monetize the channel myself 😏
The whole channel got demonitized, and not just the uploads with copyright music (that was stil ”fine” to keep, with ads). You could at least mention this in these messages? I cant remember any of that. So now I have a channel that had one million views and UA-cam/labels takes 100 % of all ad revenue. I have no issue that the owners earns more money then me, they should! But I dont think its fair to demonitize whole channels while saying everything is fine, and then take 100 % ad revenues from these channels.
I didnt uploaded whole albums or anything, most of it was live stuff with bands that I know have nothing against sharing live bootlegs.
But I moved on and started a new channel. Stil have the old one though, so UA-cam can earn ”their” money 👍Today I allow people using my own tracks as long as they don’t sell it. I dont want their whole channels getting demonitized just because of this though! But I cant really guarantee that UA-cam decide something else (because of the copyright claims they stil can get if I release the music). I guess this is out of my control, even if I am the owner of these tracks and not UA-cam!
Or is it a way to guarantee that the copyright claims wont be a issue if people share my tracks the way I allow it? (And stil having ad revenue from content ID)
Very nice video and copyright problem solved
We see on Instagram and Tik Tok people constantly using famous songs of famous artists all the time. We assume that Instagram and Tik Tok has an arrangement with the Creators and with the famous artists where they each receive a split in revenue created? Is this correct? If so why doesn't UA-cam do the same? Seems like UA-cam is a bit of a slow Dinosaur in this regard
Thanks for your information sister ❤️
I have had two short videos in which I used music from the UA-cam library which were flagged as copyright. One song was “watermelon sugar”, and the other was a techno song. Can you explain why this happened?
Same the video was 14 seconds and got flagged this happened multiple times even a video with non copyrighted basic audio from a known non copyright free source was flagged, my voice was flagged during a video in which I narrated and comments removed, when previously it had not been, it's scary not knowing what to do and trying so hard to follow the rules and still have this happen, honestly it's discouraging is specially when you're at a stage of building conference.
I just searched for the watermelon sugar song and it doesn't show in the Audio Library at all. As it is I am wondering if it was a song you had to attribute. In the Audio Library there are songs that have the UA-cam symbol and require no attribution and others that say "CC" - the non attribution songs seem to have a higher level of restriction and the one's that need attribution don't.
I'm also wondering if I create shorts on my alt, that if I should use more recent music as opposed to stuff from 10 years ago
Nice video ❤
I've used short shelf music on previous videos within the UA-cam app, no third party, and still received copyright claims, also the audio library isn't updated very often as far as I've been noticing the same audio for months hence it's a bit difficult to find fresh tracks in the audio library, I appreciate the clarification and the current options available but sometimes it can still be difficult to find fresh music and or shorts music that won't get a content ID claim regardless of following instructions, I hope adjustments are made so that the system doesn't falsely flag or claim audio via upload as it's quite nerve rattling not knowing what will happen upon upload and or having even you're speaking voice flagged zero profanity spoken yet this still occurred due to sensitive ID scanning systems etc.
MantAbbb
That's how they are getting money, corruption, not only from the claimers but from this platform.
Excellent info to know, thanks!
شكرا جزيلا يوتيوب علي معلمومات المفيدة ❤
Awesome!
It doesn't make any sense for your ENTIRE video to get demonetized because of a few seconds of copyrighted music. The copyright holder should get a cut of the revenue relative to how much that part of the video is watched compared to the rest of the video.
Thanks for this one ❤❤❤❤
Hello this is very nice information. Congratulations thanks you so much Celino Baptista I am from Brazil.
It's laughable the number of times you hear about channels that get UA-cam strikes on their own music 🙄 UA-cam is a time and energy waster on that sort of thing, not to mention the distress it causes.
It's something important for me, thank a lot yt❤
UA-cam Creators thank you 👍👍👍👍👍👍
Ok but what about false copyright claims made by scam companies that claim content that are not theirs?
Good information thanks ❤❤
What if creators of the music in youtube audio library suddenly change their copyright policy?
Will this get people who use their music in trouble?
Is changing the policy like that even possible?
Because I've heard of people getting claimed for using music in youtube audio library. What's up with that?
Weird that even though we should just be able to make covers of songs and stuff, we cant, even though its completely under fair use of the law.
legally you still need to get a mechanical license from the original creator's publisher tho
So there is an app called sing where you can make a new video of you singing versions of songs and uploading it to UA-cam. How does this work with a copyright?
I got a copyright claim even after using music from the shorts library... How to avoid that since the track used comes from UA-cam shorts library...?
There are channels which provide no copyrights songs, what's your view on that?
Can you show us pls 😊
Great explanation - but it certainly complicated.
I hope I am doing it right, but really don't know if I am.
This definitely help 😅 I’m getting copyright almost every upload 🤣
Thank you very much, you are an amazing person❤
Review VIDEO . Lo mejor en la Industria del UA-cam Creators Studios la Mejor al Nivel Mundial 🏍🚀🚀🚀 ❤❤❤
❤Thank you for this BUT when ever i UPLOAD Shorts with Free Royalty Library Music , Shorts Don't go viral even if The Video is not BOring 😢 , Dont know how but im not the only one experimented this issue😂 ,But Hey thanks we need more educational vids like this one for heads up
Thank you for sharing your knowledge about UA-cam❤
I have a question, when will Creator Music come out on other countries (specifically Philippines, if you can answer the question) Thank you!!!
i also need to know that
Nice❤
0:09
Thank you for this❤, but pls why do some of my videos earn less than the others, even though they are in same nich?
Thank you UA-cam teem for this information.🎉
what about (well known) song-cover content?
ماذا عن استخدام موسيقى قنوات أخرى عن طريق البحث اثناء رفع فيديو قصير؟ هل يخالف ام ان الارباح تتقاسم معه؟ طبعا اقصد البحث بالموسيقى الرائجة اثناء رفع فيديو الشورتس وليس تحميل هذه الموسيقى مسبقا ووضعها بالفيديو عبر برنامج مونتاج ثم رفعها لليوتيوب...
Ok but how do you stop non copyright owners from claiming you?
Thanks, its very informative for new creators like me. More power and God bless
I loved the explanation, I'm learning a lot from UA-cam every day. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Thanks.🙏🏻🌸💝
Nice ❤
How about options for viewers to see the dislike counter?
There is one issue that UA-cam hasn't yet addressed, it would be great to hear back from UA-cam so I know where I stand. I have recently started out on UA-cam, my intent is to upload tutorials and shorts about 3d development. I write my own music and sound fx for all my content, but yet it seems people are free to remix my audio on UA-cam shorts with absolutely no attribution regardless of copyright. Will UA-cam address this glitch, are there any plans for UA-cam to make it possible for me to tag my Music and FX so that my audio is respectfully attributed back to my channel?
It’s not a glitch. It’s a built in feature, and since it’s shorts, and you’re not a licensed artist, that’s how it will remain.
@@AnarTheAnarchist My music has copyright attributed to it, and so I fail to understand why UA-cam would allow copyright material to be remixed without attribution or consent. Regardless of policy, copyright law still remains. Maybe I am missing something, and so it would be helpful if UA-cam addressed these concerns.
❤❤❤
@@PhotiniByDesign It's the same think that happens on tikTok, the idea is that people using their smartphones to create videos will be able to use this willy nilly. Thing is it's not that great for them as the song ovrwrite and dialogue that the second creator has
There is a box you can untick on the first page of the Studio when you're uploading new videos. By default it is ticked (and allows others to use your audio for shorts) but if you untick that box others can not use your audio and if they already are, their shorts are muted.
What about when your walking in Public and some bar is playing music so loud. That you pick it up while your recording say a travel video? And/or/also what if your doing a food video in a restaurant. Recording what you eat and music is played thru the restaurant? I can not tell the restaurant or bar to turn off the music. Or someone rides by on a bike or car. Playing loud music? That you do not want to hear in the first place?
Very good 👍
Gracias por la información, saludos
This is good for newest UA-camrs! 😊❤
Thanks for your valuable words regarding the subject for creator's.
Thanks for the updated information
UA-cam deals a deathblow to companies that monopolize music, a deathblow to game companies, anime, etc... And a decisive deathblow to the content creator who reuses such. We're done and UA-cam is done.
unfortunately, (I have been posting cartoons on youtube since 2006 and was very loyal) I agree with you. I have since transferred to Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter because these platforms, imperfect as they are, usually provide way more creative freedom than YT does. They're losing us in favor of pleasing enormous companies, and I find that sad but inevitable. UNLESS they change their ways and allow culture to flow freely without punishing creators.
@@AvitalShtap Well said
Very beautiful video 😍😍
Thank you you are doing a great job.......Respect From Algeria🌹
Thank you for sharing this information for the new creator like me ,thank you so much .❤❤❤
Muy bien explicado ❤saludos ❤
Thanks for your informative video ❤❤❤❤🙏
1) Why do we use copyright protected songs? We like them and they are much better.
2) We want to share with music lgbels. But can we get in touch with the major labels for permission? No, they don't even answer us.
Perfect❤
Wow it's great ❤
Thanks for valuable information 🙏
your music library not have EPIC song please put some EPIC musics
Very helful for beginners of how to use music that safe.
THANKS FOR THE GREAT ADVICE, JUST AS ALWAYS, UA-cam CREATORS CHANNEL!!!! 😄😁👍📱📹⭐❤
❤ Reina Coleman. 👑✨❤ (Buckeye, Arizona. 🌵☀🇺🇸) .
What if I want to use songs that aren’t in the library for creating music videos where the song is an essential part? I would let the music owners take all the profit if that’s what it took to have artistic freedom, although 50/50 for sonic/visual would seem fair to me. So far NONE of the songs I want are available. I really want to share these amazing songs and my visions with people. :/ What can I do to get permission from artists/labels and permission recognition from UA-cam? Is there any streamlined process or do I have to research and cold call/email artists and labels for every single track?
P.s. I wish I could just share a link to a massive Spotify playlist and UA-cam creator music app could just scan it and pull up all available songs. I don’t have time for one by one search.
P.s. Would it be legal to upload a silent video and just tell people to play the song on a separate device at the same time? 👀
This idea is so amazing! I would love this. I would be happy to give up my profits too for creative freedom. Because I don't care about $20, I care about making a funny cartoon that fits what I imagine.
I don't think permissions and stuff matters, in my experience (have been on YT since 2006). I have even received strikes on my own music and I obviously have permission on myself. It's the record labels that are the issue and they're notoriously difficult to manage.
Sad as it may sound, I have found my solution in posting on Twitter and Instagram and TikTok...which allow that creative freedom much more.
Thank you for sharing video and information music UA-cam studio
Very informative video...I use UA-cam Library music... please add more Islamic backgrounds music for videos so that we can't use it from any other side.
The Best policy UA-cam 👍😍
🎉❤gud information
I'm already following your advice. Thank you for proposing it again
Helpful and clears misconceptions!
Thanks for the great show❤
💕Lights, camera and music! Enhance videos with the perfect soundtrack from UA-cam's Audio Library and Creator Music.
I have a question if the music is sped up or slowed reverb will you still have a chance to get copyrighted
Vid starts at 3:00
Terimakasih, sangat bermanfaat sekali infonya
Creator Music sounds cool, hopefully it gets added to UK as well
RẤT HỮU ÍCH ! YTB ĐÃ MỞ RA 1 TƯƠNG LAI SÁNG TẠO !
Thanks for the info UA-cam I have a lot of copy right 😂 and I'm so worried about it
Really good tutorial BUT UA-cam has many flaws that still to this day did non resolve. Like the retroactive copyright claims on older videos.
Something like this: I have a small gameplay channel and years ago I made a playthrough of Quake. At the time that I was recording and editing the run, the soundtrack that came with the game was free for everyone and so everything was monetized. Then the pandemic struck, Trent Reznor realized that "Hey, I can make a Vinyl of Quake with the whole OST". Cool, no problem with that. But when your record label starts to screw over the content creators by demonetizing everything or worse, asks the platform to take down some of the videos, that's when you realize that the amount of care, passion or hard work doesn't pay off one bit.
So hyped for Creator music man. Can’t wait to become a YTP