Couldnt locate the original upload so im mirroring this. Guy's channel who made the video- check it out for many more good videos explaining magnetism / kathodosdotcom
WOW! Thanks KEN,-- Yes in my empty gazing/watching, when the black Void ,Rock tunell appear, i enter without fear & discover my garden eden, The tree of life & Knowledge now knowing itself as the knower & known in person. The GREAT Dielectricity, magnetism, & electrcity. This too the Great consciousness energy, looking at itself through your eyes & ours..That it is! You are! I am! Forever gratefull! 🙏
Wow! You confirmed my theory of acoustics . The rainbow of colors do not follow Roy G Biv. Each color represents a specific and objective note in music and the color scheme showed in this video follows the harmonic overtone series. Colors have a specific resonance akin to sound. Each color represents a nodal vector. This is another example of waves acting like particles. Very cool.
he's explaining basic principles with strings of wordbombs that I can't seem to follow as non native speaker, so his explanations are not for simple minds like mine. it's a shame because he's offering so much knowledge but I can't seem to grasp it. bombs like dielectric centripetal inertial counterspacial displacement by magnetism make my head spin lol edit: yeah i understood nothing, he's explaining the words with the same words and then repeats himself 10 times during the video
I know that feeling, but you are on right way. For me was helpful, to slow down the playback to 75%, when he says the definitions. Then write it down and try to understand the words. And then try to understand the whole thing. It doesn't come instantly. Sometimes it takes weeks to grasp that.
Interesting. I know opposite fields prefer different metals. But thanks to this I will have to try clockwise and counterclockwise windings on coils. Thank you.
If it's all child's play and it's so simplex. . .Then explain it in a manner like you are explaining it simply and to a child. Saying 10 words in a sentence that most people don't understand unless they look them up does not make what you are saying easy to understand.. especially when you say it all as fact as you can possibly say it.
Why should he lower himself to compensate for a audience who have no comprehension or no will to increase their lexicon by learning? If you want to follow what he is putting out, to make your own opinion - either get on that level of vocabulary, else go watch a cartoon. It's bad enough that newspapers are written at a primary school level to compensate for stupid humans who have no drive whatsoever to rise from their pragmatic state. Now people want to criticise the learned and drag them to their level because they couldn't be fucked looking up the definition of a new word. GTFO.
He says this 5×Psi = Q Electrification and Planck or similar things but I never quite get for certain the words he is saying (*and* Planck? *of* Planck?) He says it as if regardless of how much or how little we know already, we would *OBVIOUSLY* know that one already.... I would like him to write it. :/
there is no one written blog about what is dilectricity … and this man - among others - tries to prove it exists just by repeating every now and then the names of some scientists who allegedly rejected the concept of a particle electron and therefore "we have to accept his premise as if it were the only choice we have". … please explain dilectricity properly before you try to explain magnetism and unite the four forces
Could an "electron" be simply some sort of energy fluid? I'm not sure what to call it, electromagnetic physics isn't exactly my strongest section. Essentially, it behaves as though it has surface tension in the presence of a positive charge, but it gets 'discharged' when enough energy is introduced to pluck chunks of this energy fluid out, like pulling out droplets of water when you dab your finger into a glass of water.
Yes I think that is A good explanation although you can't Say that IS the way it is it is a Good way the Visualize it the Problem in Discussing these things and what this (Clearly Intelligent)Man is Failing to explain is Partical Wave duality And It is NOT His fault this is something NOONE Understands if they tell you they Do they are Wrong or Lying. Heretical SCIENCE cannot answer this Question (Particle or wave?, Both? or Neither?) Having said That I think there are some Helpful Concepts being Discussed Here and We Will NEVER Know if We do not make Attempts to understand; That is After All What Science IS. An ATTEMPT to understand.
If I remember correctly, this guy continually says particle-wave dualities are bullsh*t. Also, science is not really an attempt to understand, rather a system of pattern recognition, using that pattern to then predict and model behaviors of things in the world, and if a better pattern becomes available, then that becomes standard if it's proven to work.
I like to think of an electron as the spots on the surface of a tesla globe (or whatever you want to call it) those electric globes where you can touch the surface and attract more 'lightning bolts'
Perhaps it is explained "well", but it's certainly not approachable. I think I know roughly what he's trying to say, but I don't know how much of it is my interpretation or his vague and repetitious jargon. I'm lucky enough to have an appreciation for ether and dielectric materials, but that's the only reason I don't outright dismiss this as a text book example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
A dielectric is an insulator, made up of atoms. The positive and negative charges increase capacitance due to the dielectric insulator. your video is great and fantastic however you use to many $3 words that people don't understand, if you could just dial it down a notch and actually explain each term independently without using all your fancy vocabulary words to impress people then you would have a million subscribers. Being a genius, you should already know that. It's your ego that won't do that, because it's important to make other people feel stupid. Isn't it?
Definitions are folly, the description shows the link to the guys channel I posted this from. We CANNOT fully understand this realm until you let it all go and enjoy the ride. I liked this video because he is hinting at the subtle energies that actually construct the things we see. Nothing is solid- it's like a cloud but better and indescribable. Researching science has brought me to Faith which needs no understanding. I used to think I knew it all, now I just let it be;)
Ken Wheeler, the guy in the video, has taken the basic concepts from Eric Dollard. Dollard has taken his basic concepts from Faraday, Maxwell, Tesla, Steinmetz. They were already calling it dielectricity I guess. By dielectricity he means the difference in voltage from point A to point B, causing lines of dielectric force to appear(which is what is being redirect against the screen of the tube TV to form images). Ken Wheeler is using terms Eric Dollard is using. I discovered Ken before Eric and I didn't understand a fuck. Then I've watched some Eric Dollard video and now I understand what Ken is talking about. He's not using strange words, he's very precise. Personally I like this way of talking, given that I know what these words means.
Time to pick up a dictionary at the local library (FREE) if you don't understand a word. Or GOOGLE it. Dumbing down the content just so the lazy half wits sort of, kind of but not really, get the point, is a pointless exercise.
Dielectricity is counterspace to electricity. which is where lines of dielectric force appears. Dielectricity is attracted to Dielectricity, and there is a dielectric plane at the source that is being 'chopped' very rapidly by a magnet (his rubberband being cut annalogy) and every time the magnet breaks that dielectric plan the newly seperated chunk of dielectric force travels to the screen creating the image. thats why when you film the screen in slowmo you can see it flicker. Difference in voltage from "point" A to B is polarization i think? haha could be wrong so help me understadn that
Dielectricity is a complex phase space interaction between the spacial curvilinear anti harmonic resonances and rectilinear unified phase diractances resulting in semi-bolide homeokinetic field invariances commonly considered an electron. dielectricity couples isentropically with magnetic flux 3-space tensors causing perambulating non-periodic oscillations which are explained by the centrifugal and centripetal poles and field distortion we see when the magnet affects the so called electrons. Examining this in both time and frequency space whilst retaining our understanding of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics it is easy to see how the electron is really a dielectric field. As an easy visualisation check 7:34 in the video where we see rainbow distortion. I hope this clarifies a few things.
Electrons and positrons are produced by gamma ray mixing, they're phase conjugated solitons. Electrons and positrons have a rest mass/gravity and a particle-like volume and momentum. This is because the boundary condition in the EM field is formed by the changing dielectric constant of the electrodynamic vacuum in response to very high amplitudes. Space is a non-linear quantum optical medium, when you do wave mixing, like gamma rays, you can make holographic interference patterns ie. electron and positron particles with dielectric field lines and magnetic field lines which have a near-field, and far-field defined by the phase relationship of the dielectric and magnetic fields around the particle.
Your reasoning is similar to next: if 2+3=5 and 3+3≠5, then 3+2≠5. With the "mathematical explanation" ah-haa put after the second "5" and before "then". And that's because you understand light as an electric phenomenon and the lack of light as a dielectric phenomenon. Go back to school (not the classical institution), learn to read, then learn to understand what you read, be sure that you correctly understood, try to explain to yourself, go to ask a connaisseur to verify yourself, then go to next scientific notion. This is the process... And it is valid for all those who have now fallen into ecstasy without reading their manuals during the school time. Of course you have the freedom to say what you want, but that does not mean to be correct. And this is valid not because I say it. I know very well that everyone touched by my comment will dislike, especially because they feel that they cannot understand science. They just have that feeling, in order to understand they must go back to school, and this is so difficult... "But we are more, we are so many that we are right!" OK, I say, take your right and bild your car with it. Or similar... God bless you all!
So Sad that Ken has so few Pedagogy. It's So Borring and A Great Pain to hear Him Repeating and Repeating Always The Same Things on and on while in a 5th of the duration He could made it! :( So Sad because despite I can't Grant Him All Confidence in his INTERPRETATION (already shown He has either misinterpreted or consciously lied), He made Great Points (spiral patterns, bright spot, etc.).
@@KenTheoriaApophasis woah, no need for name calling, even if tru! Was about to delete this mirror but the comments are really intriguing. Let me know if you want it removed, thank you Ken.
Dielectricity attracts electricity, magnetism attracts nothing- it only displaces.
The fundamental concept I was missing. Thanks!
WOW! Thanks KEN,-- Yes in my empty gazing/watching, when the black Void ,Rock tunell appear, i enter without fear & discover my garden eden, The tree of life & Knowledge now knowing itself as the knower & known in person. The GREAT Dielectricity, magnetism, & electrcity. This too the Great consciousness energy, looking at itself through your eyes & ours..That it is! You are! I am! Forever gratefull! 🙏
Did you notice the swastika pattern when the magnet was placed near the screen? It's an ancient symbol. Intruiging.
Wow! You confirmed my theory of acoustics . The rainbow of colors do not follow Roy G Biv. Each color represents a specific and objective note in music and the color scheme showed in this video follows the harmonic overtone series. Colors have a specific resonance akin to sound. Each color represents a nodal vector. This is another example of waves acting like particles. Very cool.
no particles... just pertubations of the medium/ether
he's explaining basic principles with strings of wordbombs that I can't seem to follow as non native speaker, so his explanations are not for simple minds like mine. it's a shame because he's offering so much knowledge but I can't seem to grasp it. bombs like dielectric centripetal inertial counterspacial displacement by magnetism make my head spin lol
edit: yeah i understood nothing, he's explaining the words with the same words and then repeats himself 10 times during the video
I know that feeling, but you are on right way. For me was helpful, to slow down the playback to 75%, when he says the definitions. Then write it down and try to understand the words. And then try to understand the whole thing. It doesn't come instantly. Sometimes it takes weeks to grasp that.
The video is from Ken Wheeler, aka Theoria Apophasis.
Interesting. I know opposite fields prefer different metals. But thanks to this I will have to try clockwise and counterclockwise windings on coils.
Thank you.
If it's all child's play and it's so simplex. . .Then explain it in a manner like you are explaining it simply and to a child. Saying 10 words in a sentence that most people don't understand unless they look them up does not make what you are saying easy to understand.. especially when you say it all as fact as you can possibly say it.
Why should he lower himself to compensate for a audience who have no comprehension or no will to increase their lexicon by learning? If you want to follow what he is putting out, to make your own opinion - either get on that level of vocabulary, else go watch a cartoon.
It's bad enough that newspapers are written at a primary school level to compensate for stupid humans who have no drive whatsoever to rise from their pragmatic state. Now people want to criticise the learned and drag them to their level because they couldn't be fucked looking up the definition of a new word.
GTFO.
@@owenbartrop8963 Ive seen people stuggle with this and I think there might be a significance in that.
I am having motherfucking visions
i tried drawing these but got more confused
He says this 5×Psi = Q Electrification and Planck
or similar things but I never quite get for certain the words he is saying (*and* Planck? *of* Planck?)
He says it as if regardless of how much or how little we know already, we would *OBVIOUSLY* know that one already....
I would like him to write it. :/
there is no one written blog about what is dilectricity … and this man - among others - tries to prove it exists just by repeating every now and then the names of some scientists who allegedly rejected the concept of a particle electron and therefore "we have to accept his premise as if it were the only choice we have". … please explain dilectricity properly before you try to explain magnetism and unite the four forces
But all of (electro) chemistry is based on the number of "electrons" orbiting the "protons" :( Do we need a do over?
yes
I have no idea what he's saying. He is saying words but when put together make no sense. Reminds me of politicians
Where can I get a good layman's explanation of dielectricity? This is interesting, but I need some fundamentals.
😂 that part
Book "uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism" - Ken L Weeler
I am having a hard time understanding your jargon could you please advise me on some links or videos to help me get up to speed? Please
YOU DONT EXPLAIN ANYTHING! you give applications, then you even ask "do you know why?" then just say no and go onto a new topic
Earth! Taurus feilds are in every universe
smart guy but he brags a bit much
There's a reason why they call it "bragging rights"... you work hard, you deserve a little bragging.
Could an "electron" be simply some sort of energy fluid? I'm not sure what to call it, electromagnetic physics isn't exactly my strongest section. Essentially, it behaves as though it has surface tension in the presence of a positive charge, but it gets 'discharged' when enough energy is introduced to pluck chunks of this energy fluid out, like pulling out droplets of water when you dab your finger into a glass of water.
Yes I think that is A good explanation although you can't Say that IS the way it is it is a Good way the Visualize it the Problem in Discussing these things and what this (Clearly Intelligent)Man is Failing to explain is Partical Wave duality And It is NOT His fault this is something NOONE Understands if they tell you they Do they are Wrong or Lying. Heretical SCIENCE cannot answer this Question (Particle or wave?, Both? or Neither?)
Having said That I think there are some Helpful Concepts being Discussed Here and We Will NEVER Know if We do not make Attempts to understand; That is After All What Science IS. An ATTEMPT to understand.
If I remember correctly, this guy continually says particle-wave dualities are bullsh*t.
Also, science is not really an attempt to understand, rather a system of pattern recognition, using that pattern to then predict and model behaviors of things in the world, and if a better pattern becomes available, then that becomes standard if it's proven to work.
Yes exactly, for 4 year degree thats exactly right, however when they go onto further study they get that "i made it" mentality and fuck off.
I like to think of an electron as the spots on the surface of a tesla globe (or whatever you want to call it) those electric globes where you can touch the surface and attract more 'lightning bolts'
Perhaps it is explained "well", but it's certainly not approachable. I think I know roughly what he's trying to say, but I don't know how much of it is my interpretation or his vague and repetitious jargon. I'm lucky enough to have an appreciation for ether and dielectric materials, but that's the only reason I don't outright dismiss this as a text book example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
A dielectric is an insulator, made up of atoms. The positive and negative charges increase capacitance due to the dielectric insulator. your video is great and fantastic however you use to many $3 words that people don't understand, if you could just dial it down a notch and actually explain each term independently without using all your fancy vocabulary words to impress people then you would have a million subscribers. Being a genius, you should already know that. It's your ego that won't do that, because it's important to make other people feel stupid. Isn't it?
Definitions are folly, the description shows the link to the guys channel I posted this from. We CANNOT fully understand this realm until you let it all go and enjoy the ride. I liked this video because he is hinting at the subtle energies that actually construct the things we see. Nothing is solid- it's like a cloud but better and indescribable. Researching science has brought me to Faith which needs no understanding. I used to think I knew it all, now I just let it be;)
Ken Wheeler, the guy in the video, has taken the basic concepts from Eric Dollard. Dollard has taken his basic concepts from Faraday, Maxwell, Tesla, Steinmetz. They were already calling it dielectricity I guess.
By dielectricity he means the difference in voltage from point A to point B, causing lines of dielectric force to appear(which is what is being redirect against the screen of the tube TV to form images).
Ken Wheeler is using terms Eric Dollard is using. I discovered Ken before Eric and I didn't understand a fuck. Then I've watched some Eric Dollard video and now I understand what Ken is talking about. He's not using strange words, he's very precise. Personally I like this way of talking, given that I know what these words means.
Time to pick up a dictionary at the local library (FREE) if you don't understand a word. Or GOOGLE it. Dumbing down the content just so the lazy half wits sort of, kind of but not really, get the point, is a pointless exercise.
Dielectricity is counterspace to electricity. which is where lines of dielectric force appears. Dielectricity is attracted to Dielectricity, and there is a dielectric plane at the source that is being 'chopped' very rapidly by a magnet (his rubberband being cut annalogy) and every time the magnet breaks that dielectric plan the newly seperated chunk of dielectric force travels to the screen creating the image. thats why when you film the screen in slowmo you can see it flicker.
Difference in voltage from "point" A to B is polarization i think? haha could be wrong so help me understadn that
Dielectricity is a complex phase space interaction between the spacial curvilinear anti harmonic resonances and rectilinear unified phase diractances resulting in semi-bolide homeokinetic field invariances commonly considered an electron. dielectricity couples isentropically with magnetic flux 3-space tensors causing perambulating non-periodic oscillations which are explained by the centrifugal and centripetal poles and field distortion we see when the magnet affects the so called electrons. Examining this in both time and frequency space whilst retaining our understanding of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics it is easy to see how the electron is really a dielectric field. As an easy visualisation check 7:34 in the video where we see rainbow distortion. I hope this clarifies a few things.
Electrons and positrons are produced by gamma ray mixing, they're phase conjugated solitons. Electrons and positrons have a rest mass/gravity and a particle-like volume and momentum. This is because the boundary condition in the EM field is formed by the changing dielectric constant of the electrodynamic vacuum in response to very high amplitudes.
Space is a non-linear quantum optical medium, when you do wave mixing, like gamma rays, you can make holographic interference patterns ie. electron and positron particles with dielectric field lines and magnetic field lines which have a near-field, and far-field defined by the phase relationship of the dielectric and magnetic fields around the particle.
marker113 This is all Urdu to me but thanks much for the effort! Thanks also for the sub! Hope to chat again!!
Yes thanks!
Cool
Your reasoning is similar to next: if 2+3=5 and 3+3≠5, then 3+2≠5. With the "mathematical explanation" ah-haa put after the second "5" and before "then".
And that's because you understand light as an electric phenomenon and the lack of light as a dielectric phenomenon.
Go back to school (not the classical institution), learn to read, then learn to understand what you read, be sure that you correctly understood, try to explain to yourself, go to ask a connaisseur to verify yourself, then go to next scientific notion.
This is the process... And it is valid for all those who have now fallen into ecstasy without reading their manuals during the school time.
Of course you have the freedom to say what you want, but that does not mean to be correct. And this is valid not because I say it.
I know very well that everyone touched by my comment will dislike, especially because they feel that they cannot understand science. They just have that feeling, in order to understand they must go back to school, and this is so difficult... "But we are more, we are so many that we are right!" OK, I say, take your right and bild your car with it. Or similar...
God bless you all!
So Sad that Ken has so few Pedagogy. It's So Borring and A Great Pain to hear Him Repeating and Repeating Always The Same Things on and on while in a 5th of the duration He could made it! :(
So Sad because despite I can't Grant Him All Confidence in his INTERPRETATION (already shown He has either misinterpreted or consciously lied), He made Great Points (spiral patterns, bright spot, etc.).
... hey, do know ken wheeler? 🤔
About as much as anyone who watches his videos, cool dude- probably thinks too much:)
There is no such thing as dielectricity.
think again fool, go read CP Steinmetz, Nikola Tesla, Heaviside etc etc....... those are the GODS of electrical theory
youre a fool
@@KenTheoriaApophasis woah, no need for name calling, even if tru! Was about to delete this mirror but the comments are really intriguing. Let me know if you want it removed, thank you Ken.
@@KenTheoriaApophasis please name some specific books worth reading