We Owe Pilots A Lot But They Have No Reason To Strike - Kenya Airways CEO Allan Kilavuka

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 71

  • @khakula
    @khakula 2 роки тому +3

    I was waiting for this interview, thank you Spice FM.

  • @chrismak8384
    @chrismak8384 2 роки тому +7

    We all tell the version of the story that makes us look good. Let's hear from the pilots next.

  • @mememan777
    @mememan777 2 роки тому +2

    As a frequent flyer I have flown on KQ B777 between Amsterdam/London and Nairobi. The aircraft were full most of the time. They even had more cargo capacity. Ethiopian/Emirates are utilizing the same.
    More explanation needed on this
    “ special purpose vehicle “
    Who decides what “ equipment to lease “ ( Where the eating occurs)
    Check the lease agreement for these 777 and compare with the market rate.

    • @angelamaitima9858
      @angelamaitima9858 2 роки тому +1

      Devil 😈 is in the detail

    • @eacoincmubiru5894
      @eacoincmubiru5894 2 роки тому

      And even Ethiopian Airlines utilizes B787 on some African routes because of cargo capacity. Kenya Airways is really losing out with those Embraers.

  • @eliasbusienei9566
    @eliasbusienei9566 2 роки тому +5

    Pilot numbers is correct. He should have addressed that numbers are required to cover trainings, sick off, sick leaves, annual leaves, compassionate leaves, layovers, possible disruptions, standbys etc.

    • @maxowiti7018
      @maxowiti7018 2 роки тому

      Considering the industry mean is anywhere between 10 - 17 pilots per aircraft the pilot numbers are actually conservative...It is interesting to note that Virgin signed an interline agreement with KQ in July of this year, joined SkyTeam in September of the same year...and the pilots going on strike and stonewalling in November... seems a little too neat, as far as coincidences go, and more like a power play for either a hostile take over or to water down the price of an already struggling airline so someone can come buy it for a song..and incase anyone is not in the know the single largest recurrent cost to any airline after fuel is pilot training and certification...there is a sinister game afoot...

  • @carolinekusimba8154
    @carolinekusimba8154 2 роки тому +3

    Allan is a very focused CEO and he has shown that he's there for the good of the airline it's not about him. He's looked at the bigger picture ready to take responsibility for any decision he will make and isn't willing to compromise or impress anyone! Difficult place to be at based on the past reputation of KQ. Keep it up you're one of the few visionary leaders who standout!

  • @angelamaitima9858
    @angelamaitima9858 2 роки тому +8

    Anyone who fly via Kenya Airways know that it's employees are not well remunerated. They all look and act demotivated. It's no wonder they are striking

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      Question for you? Who are you comparing KQ employees to? Let's first in my opinion compare them to their counterparts in Africa and see where they rank in remuneration against other African airlines. Then you will begin to see that KQ employees are some of the highest paid in Africa.

  • @munenemartin9205
    @munenemartin9205 2 роки тому +2

    invite the Kapla officals to understand the real bone of contention

  • @geffeniz
    @geffeniz 2 роки тому +1

    KALPA should be interviewed next

  • @nimoahmedhassan3124
    @nimoahmedhassan3124 2 роки тому +1

    How does a whole airline which started in 1977 as it shows in google but was privatized in 1996 and only owns 2 aircraft....Aaaiii KQ iwache mchezo, Allan sounds dedicative but actions need to prove that and we need to hear the pilot's pia.

  • @haroldotieno5804
    @haroldotieno5804 2 роки тому +3

    Is there really a business case for KQ, bearing in mind it always has to be bailed out by public funds despite year on year sales growth?

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      KQ just needs to change its business model and adopt the model of Ethiopia/ Emirates/ Rwanda airlines where they are 100% run by government that's why they are profitable.

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      @@enterpreneur9738
      I totally agree with you. But its in national interest that they figure out a way.

  • @manmarko28
    @manmarko28 2 роки тому +8

    I think the pilots have done a disservice by striking coz this is the same employer they want to pay them yet the strike is going to cause the airline to sink deeper into debt. It doesn't make sense. Why not go on a go slow while you still negotiate so that the airline is not bleeding money that you so dearly need. I am a Kenyan and I want to be proud of my countries airline like Ethiopia and Rwanda airways. I definitely agree this is economic sabotage. I agree that the pilots should be involved with day to day operations in the airlines. Another thing I agree with the pilots that the airlines should have departments that cater for tourism, cargo, etc.

    • @trizahmacharia2939
      @trizahmacharia2939 2 роки тому +1

      kwanza wana goma in a "toddler"govt. aki,it looks political

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      @@trizahmacharia2939
      Kabisa. Yet they are the highest paid.

    • @mosesogutu9935
      @mosesogutu9935 2 роки тому +2

      You are convinced all those pilots put their careers on the line for economic sabotage fuelled by political interests?..Zanny

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      @@mosesogutu9935
      Of course it is the airline has no money to pay them so who is gona bail them out? We all know that scenario obviously it will be the government of the day 2 months into office.

  • @eQ-13
    @eQ-13 2 роки тому +3

    All the years of KQ operations and they fully own only two planes?
    Unbelievable

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      But most airlines don't own the planes. Most airlines lease out planes the world over.

    • @AnalystTosh
      @AnalystTosh 2 роки тому +1

      Why do they need to own them? FYI Safaricom does not own the Safaricom HQ buildings

    • @eQ-13
      @eQ-13 2 роки тому

      @@manmarko28 So if that's the case, why are they taking loan to buy even more. Shouldn't they be leasing?

    • @eQ-13
      @eQ-13 2 роки тому

      @@AnalystTosh Safcom not owning the buildings I can understand. It's not their core business so I wouldn't expect them to own the building.

    • @AnalystTosh
      @AnalystTosh 2 роки тому

      @@eQ-13 Telecoms are also opting not to own the masts as well…. KQ’s core business is to provide flight services, they don’t need to own the planes to do that, you have heard the CEO say that some big airlines lease 400 aircrafts at a go…

  • @geoffreyndubi6941
    @geoffreyndubi6941 2 роки тому +3

    Why wait until the last minute to agree on the 90%. If the CBA was in place kitambo. This is a shame the CEO should do the honorable thing and resign.

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому +1

      This will never end because of the CBA. CBA's the world over is a yoke on all the companies that have them in effect. You know a company like Amazon does not have CBA's or unions. I bet you Emirates or Ethiopian don't have such things and that's the reason they are profitable airlines.

  • @chei1969
    @chei1969 2 роки тому

    why get one side story

  • @abdihakimharet265
    @abdihakimharet265 2 роки тому +2

    Unfortunately kenya airways own only 2 aircraft..

    • @leonardkachienga9582
      @leonardkachienga9582 2 роки тому +1

      This is the sad part where 39 planes are leased to us and we are paying them exorbitant amount literally milking our coffers dry. This is not feasible at all unless we change our mindset

    • @seven5522
      @seven5522 2 роки тому

      Owning aircrafts is not necessarily a profitable venture as it comes with the burden of maintenance. In fact, many airlines are leasing. Its a matter of getting a good lease agreement .

  • @daisymelly3098
    @daisymelly3098 2 роки тому +3

    This guy should resign,period

    • @queenslanding2882
      @queenslanding2882 2 роки тому

      Why?

    • @thomasomondi9546
      @thomasomondi9546 2 роки тому

      He is right…if a pilot has failed how do you get them back

    • @queenslanding2882
      @queenslanding2882 2 роки тому

      @@thomasomondi9546 you know there's always two sides to the coin. Do you believe those pilots are underpaid?

  • @leonardkachienga9582
    @leonardkachienga9582 2 роки тому +1

    The guy said they have 41 planes and 400 pilots (10 pilots/plane) due to safety regulation but i think they could be less maybe 8 pilots per plane hence it will lay off 72 pilots which will save them a lot of money. These pilots can also be redeployed to other strategic projects such as training or being used on part-time basis until the business stablished.

    • @geoffreyndubi6941
      @geoffreyndubi6941 2 роки тому +3

      Hii si matatu boss. If its 10 it must be 10. otherwise pple will die

    • @carolinekasiemeka9848
      @carolinekasiemeka9848 2 роки тому

      @@geoffreyndubi6941 kwani matatu ni nzi zinakufa? Iwe ndege au Ma3 ni wanaobebwa ni watu. Leonard ajue iko sheria ya anga na nchi kavu.

    • @leonardkachienga9582
      @leonardkachienga9582 2 роки тому

      True there are security issues and I know that in aviation we don't compromise in terms of security. Restructuring can only be done after a wider consultation and this my suggestion. Can you believe that out of these 41 planes the CEO revealed that they only own two while 39 are leased to them surely how much are we paying for each lease exclude maintance a lone is a head and a leg. We have to rationalized to be productive surely.

    • @geoffreyndubi6941
      @geoffreyndubi6941 2 роки тому +1

      @@carolinekasiemeka9848 The risk of death is greater in planes than ma3. You would not want to be in a plane where the pilot amechoka.

    • @MKL614
      @MKL614 2 роки тому

      @@carolinekasiemeka9848 there is a very huge difference in the risk a pilot takes compared to a matatu driver and that's why the compensation for the former is much higher

  • @smartbionic5935
    @smartbionic5935 2 роки тому +4

    As expected, not asking the pertinent questions by the interviewers. Sad.

    • @seven5522
      @seven5522 2 роки тому

      I think this is the one interview that paints the real picture of what is happening . The k24 interview was rushed and one sided. Probably you did not hear what you needed to.

    • @manmarko28
      @manmarko28 2 роки тому

      So what were the questions you wanted asked?

    • @AnalystTosh
      @AnalystTosh 2 роки тому

      Which questions were not asked?

  • @lisaogembo473
    @lisaogembo473 2 роки тому +1

    "We owe pilots a lot but they have no reason to strike" ,you must be joking

  • @davidpierson4973
    @davidpierson4973 2 роки тому +4

    We have a serious C.E.O the pilots are jokers as seen in the press conference they laugh like idiots when people are dealing with a serious issue.

    • @MKL614
      @MKL614 2 роки тому +2

      How can you even sit there and call a pilot a joker? Are you serious? Their whole career is risking their lives to ensure that you get to your destination safely. Everytime they leave their houses, their families are afraid they will not come back. They should be given the same respect as soldiers.

    • @trizahmacharia2939
      @trizahmacharia2939 2 роки тому

      @@MKL614 whi is sure will get back home when they leave,kwani yr a pilot???

    • @MKL614
      @MKL614 2 роки тому

      @@trizahmacharia2939 I am not a pilot but I know its one of those careers that are high risk and people should respect them, not threaten them

    • @davidpierson4973
      @davidpierson4973 2 роки тому

      @@MKL614 nonsense thats the reason they left their passengers stranded for days.

    • @davidpierson4973
      @davidpierson4973 2 роки тому

      @@MKL614 I call them jokers instead of taking this matter serious they all laughter like they will get a medal of honor look at the c.e.o talking its like they are in a comedy show. Its embarrassing as a nation.

  • @andrewyego3806
    @andrewyego3806 2 роки тому

    Shame those pilots hamna haya working for an airline haiundi doh

  • @snjau7613
    @snjau7613 2 роки тому +1

    If you are CEO,you haven’t done your job very well,have you? KA has been failing year in,year out. You need to leave because it is clear you are not the right person to grow this airline.

  • @bob5700
    @bob5700 2 роки тому

    The minister for health is not a doctor by profession and the president is head of defense but he probably cannot fire a rifle. That demand about a pilot heading the airlines is lame and ignorant. It doesn't reflect on the intellect we presume for pilots.

    • @SoftRod
      @SoftRod 2 роки тому +1

      But in contrast there are area where people who have been a part of the profession lend a clearer direction; otherwise Chief of General staff for the army could be advertised to the public and not require an officer.

    • @patrickadolwa268
      @patrickadolwa268 2 роки тому

      I think there is need to move away from the notion that if you are a chef , you should be allowed to run a hotel, if you are a professional footballer you are most qualified to run a sports department and that bus drivers are competent transport planners and managers. This misplaced idea has taken root in our society and se professionals feel more entitled than others working with them in the same industry. What would pilots do without the rest starting with air traffic managers?

  • @Kario-ht9oq
    @Kario-ht9oq 2 роки тому

    400 pilot's 47 Aeroplane