Granger Causality : Time Series Talk

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @wolfgangi
    @wolfgangi 4 роки тому +98

    I swear, you have some of the best most intuitive explanations on these concepts ever!

  • @subramanianmr7630
    @subramanianmr7630 3 роки тому +10

    Wow! What an intuitive way of explaining. It has becomes easy now for me to read detailed theory. This approach is best way of teaching. Thanks a lot Ritvik.

  • @fredericnicholson80
    @fredericnicholson80 Рік тому +1

    Thanks Ritvik. I finished my math masters over 30 years ago. I wish you were around back then to fill us all with your knowledge and enthusiasm. Well done!

  • @teegnas
    @teegnas 5 років тому +18

    Wow ... the approach you took for explaining this concept is really good. Please keep them coming!

    • @ritvikmath
      @ritvikmath  5 років тому

      Thanks!

    • @teegnas
      @teegnas 5 років тому +1

      @@ritvikmath Please expand your playlist on time series talk. It's very helpful.

  • @sachinrao1
    @sachinrao1 3 роки тому +4

    You are brilliant in making complicated things simple. Thank you

  • @kishore2758
    @kishore2758 6 місяців тому

    I love you man , 2 weeks of my lecture and you took 8 minutes to explain it

  • @nyjash93
    @nyjash93 4 роки тому +2

    by far the clearest video on this topic

  • @mukahazah8998
    @mukahazah8998 Рік тому

    That's an interesting concept. I'm not sure I could do the T and F tests to come out with the results, but you've given me the general understand of how it works and that helps.
    Thanks so much!

  • @jordanlee1326
    @jordanlee1326 3 роки тому

    Thank you! I am a political science student and this video (and the one on VAR) has really simplified my understanding.

  • @SphiweMkhatshwa
    @SphiweMkhatshwa Рік тому

    Thank you so much. You've simplified a concept I genuinely struggled with!

  • @fleurlion
    @fleurlion 2 роки тому

    This is the first explanation I actually get! So easy to understand - Thank you so much :D

  • @adenforst230
    @adenforst230 4 роки тому +1

    Your channel is amazing. Simple as that.

  • @mathelecs
    @mathelecs 2 роки тому

    Man you are so amazing! Thank you for sharing your knowledge!

  • @playingserious9108
    @playingserious9108 3 роки тому +1

    I think you are talented at explaining.

  • @adnanbakather4384
    @adnanbakather4384 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent. Thanks you for sharing knowledge with all.

  • @unajoh6472
    @unajoh6472 3 роки тому

    your video is amazing! thank you for your intuitive and clear explanation

  • @HuangYuwei
    @HuangYuwei 3 місяці тому

    Hi Ritvik, thank you for creating such clear picture of Granger Causality. If it's possible that Impulse Response is covered as well PLEASE?

  • @bank6033
    @bank6033 11 місяців тому

    Really the way of explanation is very nice

  • @GohOnLeeds
    @GohOnLeeds Рік тому

    Love your presentation, man :-)

  • @afafeben6882
    @afafeben6882 2 роки тому

    شكرا ، اللهم بارك 🤍

  • @yulinliu850
    @yulinliu850 5 років тому +1

    Excellent teaching of the concept!

  • @Thomas-cy3np
    @Thomas-cy3np Рік тому

    very solid explanation, thanks a lot!! :D

  • @Selcet61
    @Selcet61 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent ! Bravo !

  • @Juan-Hdez
    @Juan-Hdez 11 місяців тому

    Very useful. Thank you!

  • @avinashkumarpandey
    @avinashkumarpandey 3 роки тому +1

    Very Intuitive Video ! If you don't mind can you also give the link of the microphone you are using . Thanks

  • @TheWindization
    @TheWindization Рік тому

    Would love a full playlist on causal models and analysis with the ritvikmath clarity of explanation

  • @gloriarumao4905
    @gloriarumao4905 2 роки тому +1

    The video is very helpful. Thank you. Can you also explain the cointegration test with respect to creating a VAR model?

  • @kimkido95
    @kimkido95 5 років тому +2

    what a nice and compact video!! could you please make a video on VECM ?

  • @tianjoshua4079
    @tianjoshua4079 4 роки тому +1

    You really know time series knowledge inside out.

    • @ritvikmath
      @ritvikmath  4 роки тому +1

      Always trying to learn more!

  • @mobileentertainment212
    @mobileentertainment212 11 місяців тому

    very well explained!

  • @larifarycharis5312
    @larifarycharis5312 Рік тому

    Excellent explanation thanks

  • @lixunsu1172
    @lixunsu1172 3 роки тому

    Thank you. Great video.

  • @alfredtan5599
    @alfredtan5599 3 роки тому +1

    Great video you have done! Do you have videos on t-Test and F-Test please?

  • @johannhmartinez8550
    @johannhmartinez8550 4 роки тому +1

    Muy buena explicación. Gracias

  • @BKGA
    @BKGA 5 років тому +6

    I watched most of you series on time series. You rock!
    I wonder if you would be able to include applications using R for example. Will you be talking about impulse response function or frequency domain?
    Thanks

    • @ritvikmath
      @ritvikmath  5 років тому +3

      thanks! And I definitely will look into videos on time domain / frequency domain and related concepts!

  • @mohitgehlot6582
    @mohitgehlot6582 7 місяців тому

    Thank you so much bro.

  • @nambuihoai8222
    @nambuihoai8222 5 років тому +5

    Thank you, amazing vid! Could you please make a video on SVAR models!

  • @mathieudujardin9194
    @mathieudujardin9194 2 роки тому

    Thank you bro you're a beast

  • @manthansinghshekhawat
    @manthansinghshekhawat Рік тому

    Jo bhi apne pdhaya... Acha laga pdhke...

  • @ninakoch1799
    @ninakoch1799 3 роки тому

    love your videos!!

  • @ArunSubbiahCeo
    @ArunSubbiahCeo 3 роки тому

    Truly grateful for the incredible work. ❤ Just a suggestion: Can you also do a video on cointegration?

  • @estaykylyshbek8347
    @estaykylyshbek8347 3 роки тому

    Great video! Could you please talk about the Cointegration test?

  • @kevinaubrain1792
    @kevinaubrain1792 4 роки тому +2

    Great video ! I'am doing an internship in neuroscience and it helps me a lot in my work. Do you have any video about this kind of method that helps determining the number of lags ?

  • @sdotlondonkid
    @sdotlondonkid 3 роки тому +1

    Is the Granger causality test able to be used across more than two variables simultaneously or will I have to conduct those tests separately.

  • @totochandelier
    @totochandelier 4 роки тому +1

    thanks for your great job ! i ve just spent all the night watching all your videos on time series! just a question : what is the difference here, with VAR models ? You are using lags of an explicative variable , as you have done with VAR , didn t you ?

  • @pradoemilio3097
    @pradoemilio3097 3 роки тому

    Thank you!!!!!!

  • @gm7836
    @gm7836 4 роки тому +1

    Nice, thanks!

  • @programmingwithjackchew903
    @programmingwithjackchew903 2 роки тому

    i observe that lower the p value higher the f test, may I know what is the optimal value for f test

  • @aminnourmohammadi5025
    @aminnourmohammadi5025 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much for you awesome videos. Could you please make a series of videos about nonlinear time series analysis? ..... Also, I was wondering if you know a Matlab algorithm for measuring nonlinear/nonparametric Granger Causality.

  • @wongkitlongmarcus9310
    @wongkitlongmarcus9310 3 роки тому

    brilliant

  • @arkadiuszkuswik6765
    @arkadiuszkuswik6765 2 роки тому

    should the time series be stationary for the test? thanks

  • @sdotlondonkid
    @sdotlondonkid 3 роки тому

    Also, are there other tests for investigating causality.

  • @zhanbolatmagzumov6409
    @zhanbolatmagzumov6409 3 роки тому

    Hi Ritvik. Thanks for the code example as well. Until which lag I should look for granger causality? Starting from lag 8 the p-value decreases and around 14 lag is 0. But maybe it is by smoothing effect.

  • @cheng-lungwang5136
    @cheng-lungwang5136 3 роки тому

    what id there are two or more time series variables that I want to predict the outcome variable.
    is Granger causality can be used? or simply use VAR

  • @kabeldelices1016
    @kabeldelices1016 3 роки тому

    Can we use granger causality test whene having mixed order of integration I(0), I(1) or I(2)?
    Or we must have one and only order of integration of the variables tested ?
    Thank you

  • @programmingwithjackchew903
    @programmingwithjackchew903 2 роки тому

    hi does granger causality require no outlier data?

  • @erniesings6855
    @erniesings6855 6 місяців тому

    Are cointegration and causality the same test?

  • @mago2007
    @mago2007 4 роки тому

    R studio or python tutorial!!! Great videos!

  • @digitalresearchsupport8546
    @digitalresearchsupport8546 4 роки тому

    Can you make video on DCC multivariate Garch Model

  • @sjisx
    @sjisx 4 роки тому

    So... How does granger causality differ from correlation? Is it because of the time lag?

  • @indonesischealles5679
    @indonesischealles5679 4 роки тому

    Can we linked the causality on same goverment in two periodic time?

  • @johannaw2031
    @johannaw2031 2 роки тому

    What does Phi represent?

  • @gurmeetsingh5323
    @gurmeetsingh5323 4 роки тому

    Professor impulse response function please... VAR and IRF

  • @ProgrammerError
    @ProgrammerError 3 роки тому

    Doesn't granger causality lead to a chicken or egg problem? One could also say that the rich city is following the poor city (if you drew your graph completely)

    • @Isaiah_McIntosh
      @Isaiah_McIntosh 2 роки тому

      Couldn't you then check impulse response to determine the direction of causality?

  • @iftikhar58
    @iftikhar58 Рік тому

    best

  • @kanejiang2938
    @kanejiang2938 Рік тому

    So , in my opinion, the pool city line is lag 1 of the rich city

    • @kanejiang2938
      @kanejiang2938 Рік тому

      But i have a question. How can i decide the best AR model to predict pool city line by itself?

  • @saitaro
    @saitaro 4 роки тому

    OMG 60fps suddenly, wow! Who need Star Wars and stuff now? Ditch that, I choose learning stats. Go on, man, fire it up!

  • @Achrononmaster
    @Achrononmaster 2 роки тому

    @2:00 pretty stupid (neoliberal) idea to do export led growth. You want to maximize useful output no matter what, for that you run a sovereign currency to guarantee full employment. You only export your surplus to domestic needs, which "pay for" the imports. If you need _more_ imports (for whatever reason) you *_definitely do not link currencies_* you use a floating exchange rate. Then if the imports cause pass-through inflation you re-gauge your own currency, because why the hell would you not! This way the poor nation never borrows foreign currency. They'd only need to borrow a foreign currency (and incur IMF penalties) if they do fix or peg the exchange rate. It would be incredibly stupid to do that, since debts in a currency your government does not monopoly issue cannot be guaranteed to be redeemed.
    You take the pass-through inflation hit instead, but raise the minimum real wage to keep everyone employed, until you later do produce enough surplus to domestic needs that will pay for the imports. If that never eventuates you just stick to the inflation led growth, since state currency is a mere numeraire this is indefinitely sustainable. Foreign debt is not. No need ever to borrow a foreign currency. No need to peg or fix the exchange rate (which is effectively a needless tax on your population). Key is full employment, not low inflation.

  • @raulq.3519
    @raulq.3519 4 роки тому

    Amazing. Thank you, Ritvik! I've a got a curiosity, if I want to run a Granger test, let's say in R, basically the function iterates through various lags -of the rich city, mentioning the example- until finding those 3 and 5 lags?

  • @jinchengwang3511
    @jinchengwang3511 2 роки тому

    Neymar, is that you?