1. Start your preparation of Judicial Service at home with our membership plan. For more details drop a message on WhatsApp on this number : 8840961324 or visit this link WhatsApp. wa.me/message/KQFV6VUK5AIWB1 2. Follow us on: Instagram: instagram.com/theoryofabrogation?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 3. Twitter:mobile.twitter.com/NajeebU83984530 4. Facebook: facebook.com/theoryofabrogation
Sir, in the book of the law of evidence by batuk lal, it has been written in the case of Ram Bharose vs State of UP, that the statement of the accused to his wife that he would give her jewels and that he had gone to the house of the deceased is inadmissible, but you are saying that it is admisable according to the same case. Kindly clear my confusion.
Sir pls clear, Such communication are protected even after dissolution of marriage but those made either before marriage or after its dissolution are not protected
marriage khatm hone ke baad koi communication protected nhi hai . But jo communication during marriage ki gyi hai vo comminication marriage khatm hone ke baad bi protected rhegi
Dissolution of marriage after marriage has taken place, whereas nullity is something that happen before marriage due to Legal Restrictions like Minor , Insanity etc.
appreciable research over Law Bro..M also the final year student of Law from Pak..If u find appropriate then send me ur WhatsApp num so that v can discuss the theories, doctrines and rules of Law..
1. Start your preparation of Judicial Service at home with our membership plan. For more details drop a message on WhatsApp on this number : 8840961324 or visit this link WhatsApp. wa.me/message/KQFV6VUK5AIWB1
2. Follow us on:
Instagram: instagram.com/theoryofabrogation?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
3. Twitter:mobile.twitter.com/NajeebU83984530
4. Facebook: facebook.com/theoryofabrogation
Najeeb Sir, u explain in very easy and simple manner
Watching ur video + reading the content and done for the topic 🔥
You are a blessing fr us . thank yu so much .
Sir ,etni achhi jankari k lite dhanyawad
Mahe ramzan Mubarak ho
Khuda aapke har nek murado KO muqqmal kare
Sir am ur big fan for ur teaching skill. Ur teaching skill is very superb , fantastic, awesome..Which is very helpful for us
Very good explain. ...and u r very innocent sir😀😃😄
Bhai bhut acha samjhate ho ap
Bhai bohat achcha lagta h aapke lecture ko sun kar.
thank you muchh... u make law subjects so easy to understand..
bhai aapnai bhot hi bhadiya tarikai sai samajaaya thanxs
How cute when he say ...hame nhi pta isko kese pronounce krna h...🤭🤭
sir I was very confused about this topic...thank you so much for your explanation....😊😊😊😊
Bahot bdhiya ....Bhai.
Thabk u sir..... Dono language me smjhane ke lie
सर, आप बहुत अच्छा समजाते है. आपका पुरे indian evidence act के ऊपर कोई ऑनलाईन पेड कोर्स हो तो मुझे बताये.
ur all lectures are awesome sir
You are just extraordinary.
Sir .. what if a husband wants to use a audio clip of his wife's words of their conversation as am evidence in the court. In order to get divorced
What is the fundamental difference between sec 120 & sec 122...? Please koi batey
Sir in case of this husband and wife and official and professional communications, the consent which is needed is only express and not implied right?
Sir, in the book of the law of evidence by batuk lal, it has been written in the case of Ram Bharose vs State of UP, that the statement of the accused to his wife that he would give her jewels and that he had gone to the house of the deceased is inadmissible, but you are saying that it is admisable according to the same case.
Kindly clear my confusion.
Wife testimony in court as to what her husband did that is admissible not her statement as to what he said to her.
@@TheoryofAbrogation Smj me aa gya sir,
Thank you:)
so cute explaining..😄😄
Sir pls clear,
Such communication are protected even after dissolution of marriage but those made either before marriage or after its dissolution are not protected
marriage khatm hone ke baad koi communication protected nhi hai .
But jo communication during marriage ki gyi hai vo comminication marriage khatm hone ke baad bi protected rhegi
Awesomely told..carry on bro.. 👌✌️
Very good method to teach us
Are they competent witness to each other in civil or criminal cases....
Bhaiya sec.123 to 126 IEA pr vdo bnaiya plzz
Jo third person ne suna hai kya uska evidence hearsay evidence nahi mana jayega? Kya aisa evidence admissible hai?
Please reply
Thank u soo much Sir for explaning soo well🙏
Sir section 120 and section 122 me kya difference hai ? thodi si confusion hai .
Smjhate hue thodi thodi smile bhi laya kro sir ji chere pe ache lgte ho👌
Yea I like this sir. He looks nice😎😎
Protection of s 122 gives after dissolving of marriage ?
Yes
Sir ek doubt h ki ue priviledges communication only marriage pe based h ya hum isse r kisi chees se b compare kar skte h ?
Is Hear and say evidence allow?
R /Foster case pdo
sr. kindly section 132 pe video upload kren.
sir ian from pak ... how can i get your notes
very nice
awesome video
Dissolution of marriage aur nullity of marriage me kya difference hai?
Dissolution of marriage after marriage has taken place, whereas nullity is something that happen before marriage due to Legal Restrictions like Minor , Insanity etc.
If wife and husband communication is privileged communication acc to sec 122 than how can wife or husband be competent witness acc to sec 120
@@consorcioinactivo6381 I guess, isn't marriage with minor is voidable and not void?
Thank you yaar🥰💪🏽
Ghaint bai
Nice explanation
sir ji awsm..thora negotiable pr b videos bna do sir ji
Aagar spouse ne murder Kar Diya then can they express their communication before the court...
U r the Best nazeeb........
Bhai jaan sec 116 and 117 estoppel ka smjado .plzzz
Please make more videos on Law...
Thoda hss jate to bdia lgta mja ata sbi ko
Explaination was awsome... Can u plz explain some case laws also... With sections... Thnkew
Are you from Faculty of Law, Delhi University ?
Yes am
Which year, I am from LC1
Lc2 first year
Can I get your email address or could please ping me at avimarwari@gmail.com
Thank you very much sir ji
very nice sir
Thank you so much sir.
Thank you so much
section 10 and section 32(1) per ek video bhi bnana do
Thank you sir .....
Best
thank u sir
👍
Sir plzz cover remaining section also
Jee
One thing in ur lectures is too short videos containing ultematily complete object of that section.
Mohammad Akram i try my best to convey all the necessary particulars of the topic but still i miss many of the things though not very important.
confused 😣
😀 wahi to dur kar rahe hai
Ram bharose Vs Rajasthan state hai up nhi
It's ram bharose vs state of up AIR 1954 SC 704
@@AbhishekThakur-uo6il but sir law book Jo abhi ki hai fifth semester ki usme Rajasthan hi hai
@@anupamadnaansri363 it's a different case. The correct one is Up. Maybe there's a printing error in your book.
@@AbhishekThakur-uo6il ji sir maybe aisa ho skta hai
appreciable research over Law Bro..M also the final year student of Law from Pak..If u find appropriate then send me ur WhatsApp num so that v can discuss the theories, doctrines and rules of Law..
Kya cutu ho Sir aap