The real question is: who is responsible for appointing this unqualified woman in that important position...without fact checking her cv???? That person should be identified and fired!!! unethical behaviour..😮😮😮
@@HilaryBrigham something should be done..UK is becoming the laughing stock of the world..unlawfull immigrant question..high living cost..taxes..schooling...can't starmer and co be impeached?
I guess this boils down to a matter of honesty, in which case I don't think we should hold our breath, but it does explain her lack of knowledge on economics
Someone needs to make a criminal complaint directly to the Police about Rachel's CV. It's definitely criminal as its obtaining a pecuniary advantage. She is utterly corrupt!
I will be dead by then and wont get to see the landslide the Tories will get to win and the cycle of incompetence continues, when will the country vote for some one else
Brilliant Rachel from accounts. That’s sticking. What happened to Starmer family rumour, the expenses rumour, lord Ali, can we keep these stories alive.
She is thick skinned, she will be out attending her doctors and dental appointments, that is what she does. I suspect she really didnt understand the implications of what she announced. Are the treasury Civil Servants competent.? I cant remember the last time we had a good budget for growth and for the working class people.
Also had her parliamentary credit card revoked due to financial issues over her expenses and asked to step down when she was Rachel from Accounts for falsifying reasons for attending Labour Party meetings
It was a bit more than a piece of cake, it was collective stupidity, on par with this current lot. Can't wait for 5 years to pass, so I can put a little cross in a little box.
Bill Gates and Larry Fink (Blackrock) . They were at Downing Street with Reeves and Starmer prior to the budget. Gates and Fink are the biggest landowners in the USA.
I think, when dealing with anything this government trips up upon, it must be considered in the light of how Labour would have treated this issue had Boris Johnson done it.
Where are all the Conservatives WHY ARE THEY NOT SCREAMING ABOUT THIS look how Labour called out everything the cons did.Seems like they are happy with how things are ?
You mentioned it is up to the PM to instigate an investigation in breaches of the ministerial code, outside interference would be undemocratic, surely having the whip telling MPs how to vote on the fuel allowance or be sacked is also undemocratic,
This is another example of how far our political class has fallen. MPs and Ministers are supposed to be Honourable Members. This is not just a title or form of words but a standard of behaviour to which they are expected to adhere. In the past disclosures such as these would oblige the Minister to resign as a matter of honour. No such action in this case, showing that the Chancellor is without honour and it brings the Government and the House of Commons into disrepute.
All a opposition MP is to ask her the question in the HOC. If she lies again, breach of Ministerial Code. Youd have thought the security services would have vetted these people. But we live in a two tier society - Starmer will do nothing. Probably take another foreign trip.
If you or i "LIED" on our CV we would never be given the chance to resign , we would have been sacked on the spot . Reeves is a public employee who has been given one of the most senior roles in the country / government based on the back of a series of "LIES", she not only needs sacking from the cabinet , but should face a petition to recall her seat.
Reeves has a far bigger problem than any political code. "Pecuniary advantage is a financial gain that is obtained through deception and is considered a criminal offense. In England and Wales, the offense of "obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception" was replaced by the more general offense of "fraud" by the Fraud Act 2006. However, the offense still exists in other common law jurisdictions that have adopted the English criminal model. " If she is guilty of that, and became chancellor of the strength of it, then she is also guilty "Malfeasance in a Public Office" - that means serious jail time.
CV fraud is a massive problem, but isn't also that people doing the hiring are not performing due diligence with thorough checks? The competency crisis grows and they tell kids to do the right thing, work hard and you'll get on in life but turns out you just have to be a liar and that'll do.
Problem for Labour is that 'Rachel from accounts' has the most experience with money of all the Labour party, the fact that she is making schoolgirl mistakes is ignored by Starmer.
Ms Reeves historical Companies House application to be a director of European Movement of the United Kingdom Ltd appointing her on 3rd June 2000 must have quoted her occupation as 'economist.'
Lol you don’t go from economist to complaints that’s like going from striker at Man Utd to striker at Charlton Athletic she most likely was never at boe as an economist lol
Lee Anderson calling Rachel Reeves Rachel from accounts in parliament yesterday was brilliant.
More like rachel the receptionist! The chancellor of the call centre
Well done Lee 👏
This is going to stick like …. to a blanket
Lee Anderson is fab, no waffling on, just short and extremely funny, I laughed our loud at Cannabis Farm jibe. More of Lee please x
That's a bit of an insult all of those who work in an accounts department
Should be removed this country is suffering.
...& held accountable in a functioning court of law for deception.
They just laugh at us with utter contempt
if you watch her at question time just recently her face looks like fizz, normally she is laughing with the rest
Yes they are destroying everything and still finding it funny. When the real SHTF they will be well out of harms way .
Like the snp
They should have given the job to Diane Abacus Abbott.
The real question is: who is responsible for appointing this unqualified woman in that important position...without fact checking her cv???? That person should be identified and fired!!! unethical behaviour..😮😮😮
Two Tier gave her the role.
Eish....poor UK citizens to suffer because of those idiots in parlement...get rid of labour dominance
What can be done about this?
STARMER/WEF.
@@HilaryBrigham something should be done..UK is becoming the laughing stock of the world..unlawfull immigrant question..high living cost..taxes..schooling...can't starmer and co be impeached?
Cannabis farmer was a great line tbh 😊
Maybe Reeves is the best they have got !!
It was her or Diane Abbott 😂😂
One positive about this shower, They are starting to make Liss Truss look absolutely professional.
It's blatantly obvious she's not qualified for the job. A dangerous pretender!
Worked as an economist at BoE, “Stolen Valour” 🤔
Once a liar, always a liar
Let's hope they all have good memories when this all comes back to haunt them!
Reeves and Starmer have madeJohnson look like a saint.They have revived his career.
She probably lied in every job application she has ever made.
What a circus.
I guess this boils down to a matter of honesty, in which case I don't think we should hold our breath, but it does explain her lack of knowledge on economics
Brilliant Lee just saying what we all agree with.
She should be sacked & David Lammy. They are an embarrassment to this country.
I'd add Yvette Cooper to the list !!!
I would add Rayner, cocky, rude and boring…..
Ed Milliband should definitely be on the list - likely to do the most damage to our living standards
And Cooper. And Milliband. And Rayner. The weakest government line up in my lifetime by a country mile
add rayner, cooper and milliband to that list, maybe even phillpson. The poorest inept government I think I've seen (and that includes the last lot!)
Should be jailed for fraud.
Someone needs to make a criminal complaint directly to the Police about Rachel's CV. It's definitely criminal as its obtaining a pecuniary advantage. She is utterly corrupt!
Fraud = Dismissal
@John, not just dismissal, it is a crime. She needs a visit from plod.
Please Kevin, find a way to get rid of her for the sake of us all.
So we have a liar, a cheat and a plagiarist as our Chancellor of the Exchequer !
ppl have gone to jail for this exact type of lie. wonder what she will get
@Jamie, nothing. I think the police are scared to tackle politicians and Sadiq Khan, who are effectively their bosses.
A golden handshake!
Rachel thieves from complaints deprtment is actually a walter Mitty character you could not make it up!😂😂😂
BUT SHE DID MAKE IT UP !
Another 4½ years of this... let that sink in.
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
ONLY, IF WE ALLOW IT.
CALAGHAN, WAS REMOVED.
I will be dead by then and wont get to see the landslide the Tories will get to win and the cycle of incompetence continues, when will the country vote for some one else
@@ROSEMARYHEATHER-m7hgenuine question, what mechanism was used....tia
@@leighwallis5782 ACRE!
The ministerial code, means absolutely nothing.
Much like the Pirate Code then!
Brilliant Rachel from accounts. That’s sticking. What happened to Starmer family rumour, the expenses rumour, lord Ali, can we keep these stories alive.
Lord back Ali has done a runner also last we heard he was being investigated by whom we don't know
Reeves was actually in the customer complaints department of HBOS, which will be good experience handling the complaints about her budget.
She is thick skinned, she will be out attending her doctors and dental appointments, that is what she does. I suspect she really didnt understand the implications of what she announced. Are the treasury Civil Servants competent.?
I cant remember the last time we had a good budget for growth and for the working class people.
Also had her parliamentary credit card revoked due to financial issues over her expenses and asked to step down when she was Rachel from Accounts for falsifying reasons for attending Labour Party meetings
She should be sacked but won’t be
Should be a criminal offence to lie/misinform to obtain government positions or where positions of public office areobtained.
It is. Lying on a CV is an offence under The Fraud Act, 2006. It used to be under The Theft Act 1968.
Can you imagine if Liz truss or Boris had done this
❤ Lee legend !!
Important? It’s the 2nd highest post in the country.
They are all liars hypocrites and traitors.
A liar of a WOMAN in charge of the COUNTRIES PURSE W/T/F
Boris ate a piece of cake at the wrong time and in the wrong place and Labour crucified him - live by the sword, die by the sword.
It was a bit more than a piece of cake, it was collective stupidity, on par with this current lot. Can't wait for 5 years to pass, so I can put a little cross in a little box.
Ministerial Code dont make me laugh. You get more punishment for breaking The Highway Code.
Reeves is just the front person who is advising her on these decisions
Joseph Stalin?
On the farmers, I'd say her husband, as he's head of Defra.
Research Arun advani ….
@@hydraV1-c7d Will do
Bill Gates and Larry Fink (Blackrock) .
They were at Downing Street with Reeves and Starmer prior to the budget.
Gates and Fink are the biggest landowners in the USA.
Incidentally, her job as an 'economist' at the Bank of England was very, very junior. She was nowhere near making important decisions.
In any other job, in the real world, you would be sacked.
I always thought if you got a job by lying about your qualifications and on your cv it was a criminal offence called obtaining a precuniary advantage.
It is in the real world. But in UK government, obviously not.
It used to be called 'obtaining a pecuniary advantage'....Now under the Fraud Act 2006.
She should be in prison for fraud
An economist Gordon Brown left us skint too
I think, when dealing with anything this government trips up upon, it must be considered in the light of how Labour would have treated this issue had Boris Johnson done it.
Where are all the Conservatives WHY ARE THEY NOT SCREAMING ABOUT THIS look how Labour called out everything the cons did.Seems like they are happy with how things are ?
Tory's got out on PURPOSE.
Rachel from accounts is out of her league.
She needs to go back to working behind a counter
Yes she should at Asda.
You mentioned it is up to the PM to instigate an investigation in breaches of the ministerial code, outside interference would be undemocratic, surely having the whip telling MPs how to vote on the fuel allowance or be sacked is also undemocratic,
I accidentally thought I was a rocket scientist once. In my defence it was November the 5th.
When asked a question the first response by labour ministers is to attack the person asking the question ?
Or deflect, they will not give a straight answer.
This is another example of how far our political class has fallen. MPs and Ministers are supposed to be Honourable Members. This is not just a title or form of words but a standard of behaviour to which they are expected to adhere. In the past disclosures such as these would oblige the Minister to resign as a matter of honour. No such action in this case, showing that the Chancellor is without honour and it brings the Government and the House of Commons into disrepute.
Rachel Reeves the Chancer of the Exchequer
No the opposition can’t “force” the issue but that doesn’t mean it can’t be mentioned, at every opportunity, in the HoC.
Labour will dismiss this as far right accusations or just ignore any questions.
I used to say I was an astronaut, but to be fair I was only 5.
At a minimum, it shows she has a tendency to lie. Is that a character trait we need from any MP and more over the Chancellor?
How can you trust someone who lies? You never know when they are being truthful, so she must go.
All a opposition MP is to ask her the question in the HOC. If she lies again, breach of Ministerial Code. Youd have thought the security services would have vetted these people.
But we live in a two tier society - Starmer will do nothing. Probably take another foreign trip.
Obviously has an overrated opinion of herself!
It’s against the law to falsely represent on a CV, never mind the ministerial code. She needs sacking and her pension forfeited.
Isn't it a criminal offence?
Yes under the Fraud Act, 2006.
It is to any other person but for an MP it's natural to lie ..
What it is is a crime..... called fraud by misrepresentation.... she shall be prosecuted as the poor NHS nurse was receiving 5 years sentence
If you or i "LIED" on our CV we would never be given the chance to resign , we would have been sacked on the spot . Reeves is a public employee who has been given one of the most senior roles in the country / government based on the back of a series of "LIES", she not only needs sacking from the cabinet , but should face a petition to recall her seat.
Starmer is lawyer judge and jury. Maybe 🤔. He will override being complicit with donations
Come on Britain reeves needs to go sack or resign today it can not go on lying to the people of Britain.
Parliament need to get rid with immediately.
Sick & tired of these incompetent idiots not answering questions
Reeves has a far bigger problem than any political code.
"Pecuniary advantage is a financial gain that is obtained through deception and is considered a criminal offense.
In England and Wales, the offense of "obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception" was replaced by the more general offense of "fraud" by the Fraud Act 2006. However, the offense still exists in other common law jurisdictions that have adopted the English criminal model. "
If she is guilty of that, and became chancellor of the strength of it, then she is also guilty "Malfeasance in a Public Office" - that means serious jail time.
Labour spotlighted the lack of background checking on Reform candidates, now look what has happened - talk about the pot and the kettle.
Reform holding the shoddy government to account....where are the toreeeeees?
I wonder, did she make it up or did Labour trying to make her look more competent
THEY ARE, COMPLETE, AMATEURS!! LITERALLY!!
Ministerial code . Against the law you mean
Sack her immediately as either incompetent or a liar..or both.
CV fraud is a massive problem, but isn't also that people doing the hiring are not performing due diligence with thorough checks? The competency crisis grows and they tell kids to do the right thing, work hard and you'll get on in life but turns out you just have to be a liar and that'll do.
The guest is actually very fair and well-informed.
Where is Kemi on this issue - she should be pushing for her dismissal.
She probably is digging into this a bit deeper so she has all the truth . Before she brings her down big time
We do not have faith in this government or Rachel from accounts
Great speach Lee brilliant .. They hate the truth not one labour mp is honest
The Charity Director involved paperwork are legal documents I believe....their hypocrisy is palpable....
If it’s not against the ministerial it should be by the end of the week
Reeves MUST RESIGN end off, if not Starmer should sack her. If he doesn’t it shows what he represents! Disgusting Labour Party!
Problem for Labour is that 'Rachel from accounts' has the most experience with money of all the Labour party, the fact that she is making schoolgirl mistakes is ignored by Starmer.
MPs making a joke about it but why are they not confronting her face to face ?..ask her outright why she lied as its obvious she did .
She was the tea lady
How many more scandals before we get a vote of no confidence?
Ms Reeves historical Companies House application to be a director of European Movement of the United Kingdom Ltd appointing her on 3rd June 2000 must have quoted her occupation as 'economist.'
Sorry but it does matter, she came 29th not a champion, what other lies are to be unearthed I wonder
And this woman who lied on her CV will be leashing out the next budget with no real qualifications
They need to get Wes Streeting to sort things out. Whenever he sees a cock-up, he sits on it.
🤣
I lit a rocket on the fifth of November does that make me a rocket scientist on my cv
Exactly her budget was a mess they are a laughing stock, his chief negotiator walked out today does that answer your question?????
In recent years has Labour ever appointed a competent woman Minister?
It's called DEI, (Did not Earn It).
I can imagine her in Customer Complaints alright: "To report a £22 billion black hole, press 1."
Even if it is a sackable offence starmer hasnt the balls to sack her mans a WIMP😅😅
She's an impulsive liar....birds of a feather flock together...
Rachel's next gig perhaps at the BBC? Pergaps on the 'Verify' fibs disposal team.
We need a completely new political system cos the one we've got is completely broken.
She should be sacked as she lied on her CV and holds a position of high office in the government
Don't forget how many times a chancellor has become pm when the pm moves aside
God forbid. What a thought, a liar replaced by an even bigger liar.
Bring back Diane Abbot as chancellor she is just as qualified as Reeves.
Is it likely that she was an economist at the BoE for 6 years and then moved to a complaints role at Halifax? Was she really an economist at the BoE?
Lol you don’t go from economist to complaints that’s like going from striker at Man Utd to striker at Charlton Athletic she most likely was never at boe as an economist lol
Cock up too with penny pitching savings dangering pensioners 😡