You forgot to mention how fantastically expensive they are, even with mass production. You could probably build ten gas power stations for the cost of one battery storage site...
Get'er done...🔋🔋🔋We just need to figure out how to mass produce this already proven and reliable technology; it sounds as it would be a true game changer 👍🏼
So I’m assuming that as of today these are very expensive, hopefully that price will drop with upscaling of the industry. Glad to see any advancement in affordable and safe energy storage.
clickbait. image shows car with 10,000mi range, but the transcript shows that this was not discussed in the video. the video does mention how there's less energy density than Li-ion batteries, but that would insinuate that they would give less range than modern cars, not more.
i do not see how i won before your comment about the bait and switch... i wanted to see the car with 10,000mi range, and the technology behind it. However, after your comment I now have a more honest list of channels I am subscribed to, which is more of a baseline than a win, arguably. Since you used a pleasant phrase like "win win", i assume you enjoy your hustle. @@EyeTech21
The current spec sheet for a single Enervenue ESV-40 battery cell would indicate it may not be a very good fit for mainstream passanger EV use as it's lower energy density/weight and size per kwh is hard to engineer around. Just the weight alone of one Enervenue cell is 136lbs at a capacity of 3000kwh. For comparison a Tesla model 3 pack weighs ~975lbs and gives you ~75,000kwh of capacity which at the equivalent weight in Enervenue cells you would be able to only use ~7 cells and that would only amount to 21,500kwh of total battery capacity compared to the same weight of a Tesla pack. The size of an Enervenue cell is 168mm x 1800mm so seven of them would be about 1176mm wide and 1800mm long. A Tesla pack is about 1473mm x 2146mm. With some good engineering you might be able to fit another 2-3 Enervenue cells into the same area of a Tesla pack increasing the capacity of an Enervenue pack to as much as 30,500kwh but it would add another 408lbs to the total weight of the pack which would come in at 1360lbs not including any wiring, mounting, packaging and other materials and hardware needed to make it a workable EV battery pack. In other words, at the expense of being less than half the capacity and over ~1.5 times the weight of a typical EV battery pack used in a good EV today, this battery technology is going backwards in regard to the potential range it could offer an EV. It could however, potentially and more accurately offer a 10,000,000 mile life expectancy to an EV but with that as the headline it would only be more plausible click bate.
@@spankeyfish Its older tech than NiMH, its never really been used as its fantastically expensive and makes no economical sense, just build a gas power station and be done with it.
Seems crazy we are not using them already, was it just a price thing? It said they were relatively cheap to make though
You forgot to mention how fantastically expensive they are, even with mass production. You could probably build ten gas power stations for the cost of one battery storage site...
Get'er done...🔋🔋🔋We just need to figure out how to mass produce this already proven and reliable technology; it sounds as it would be a true game changer 👍🏼
So I’m assuming that as of today these are very expensive, hopefully that price will drop with upscaling of the industry. Glad to see any advancement in affordable and safe energy storage.
With lots of fluff and little specifics, sounds great !!, so what is "the rest of the story"....
Good luck may God bless you
good for Bus and trucks
So I will wait for an EV.
Ok, let's wait for the magic battery to appear, and keep using nice ICE powered vehicles meanwhile. Everyone will be happy. 😂
clickbait. image shows car with 10,000mi range, but the transcript shows that this was not discussed in the video. the video does mention how there's less energy density than Li-ion batteries, but that would insinuate that they would give less range than modern cars, not more.
Common we all try to make it out here. It’s not that serious, plus it made you click so it’s a win win situation
i do not see how i won before your comment about the bait and switch... i wanted to see the car with 10,000mi range, and the technology behind it. However, after your comment I now have a more honest list of channels I am subscribed to, which is more of a baseline than a win, arguably. Since you used a pleasant phrase like "win win", i assume you enjoy your hustle. @@EyeTech21
@@DavidMatsonfamily just hit the dislike button and move on. Thank you!:)
The current spec sheet for a single Enervenue ESV-40 battery cell would indicate it may not be a very good fit for mainstream passanger EV use as it's lower energy density/weight and size per kwh is hard to engineer around. Just the weight alone of one Enervenue cell is 136lbs at a capacity of 3000kwh. For comparison a Tesla model 3 pack weighs ~975lbs and gives you ~75,000kwh of capacity which at the equivalent weight in Enervenue cells you would be able to only use ~7 cells and that would only amount to 21,500kwh of total battery capacity compared to the same weight of a Tesla pack. The size of an Enervenue cell is 168mm x 1800mm so seven of them would be about 1176mm wide and 1800mm long. A Tesla pack is about 1473mm x 2146mm. With some good engineering you might be able to fit another 2-3 Enervenue cells into the same area of a Tesla pack increasing the capacity of an Enervenue pack to as much as 30,500kwh but it would add another 408lbs to the total weight of the pack which would come in at 1360lbs not including any wiring, mounting, packaging and other materials and hardware needed to make it a workable EV battery pack. In other words, at the expense of being less than half the capacity and over ~1.5 times the weight of a typical EV battery pack used in a good EV today, this battery technology is going backwards in regard to the potential range it could offer an EV. It could however, potentially and more accurately offer a 10,000,000 mile life expectancy to an EV but with that as the headline it would only be more plausible click bate.
May - might - maybe 🤔? Believe it when you see it actually happen.
the cylinders are made of inconel, it's too expensive.....next
My man speaking jibberish
Hey there, can I get a reply?
Hype - but no facts.
these batteries are old tech and are crappy
These are different from NiMH batteries.
@@spankeyfish Its older tech than NiMH, its never really been used as its fantastically expensive and makes no economical sense, just build a gas power station and be done with it.
Why didn’t elon musk put them in tesla