Was Buddha An Incarnation Of Vishnu? | What Hindu Scriptures Say

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3 тис.

  • @chabmondetosen4622
    @chabmondetosen4622 2 роки тому +2093

    As a Buddhist i believe that Buddha is the enlightenment one from a common man like us. But if Hindus thinks that Buddha is a incarnation of Vishnu dev then i have no problem. Debating is useless.

    • @vb98518
      @vb98518 2 роки тому +101

      Hindu scriptures point to different person with buddha title not the one Buddhist pray to

    • @gopalakrishnan9964
      @gopalakrishnan9964 2 роки тому +138

      Bro buddist workship method is nothing but another form of Hinduism, also jain, also sikhism

    • @komalkakkar8736
      @komalkakkar8736 2 роки тому +7

      So apt!

    • @ajaysharma5287
      @ajaysharma5287 2 роки тому +15

      Well said brother

    • @King9king
      @King9king 2 роки тому +107

      @हर्ष वर्धन buddha wasnt born, king siddhartha was born, he had to achieve enlightment to become buddha

  • @nihalpathade7160
    @nihalpathade7160 2 роки тому +1528

    The BR Ambedkar Told The Buddha Wasn't Any Version Of God's He Was A Who Knows How To Live a life in peace And Thought Without Any Instrumenta Like Gun, Sword Etc... 🙏🙏🙏

    • @synthtech485
      @synthtech485 2 роки тому +150

      And how he know that

    • @sagarsrivastava1629
      @sagarsrivastava1629 2 роки тому +188

      and b r ambedhkar had read max muller translated manusmriti....no the actual one.....so many believe that how can an amriki dalal translate everthing up to mark ?....so what i think we need a committee which will study all the actual scripture and grasp the good from each...then particulate for well being of society....and some neo buddhist and hindu etc channal are just spreading hatred rather follow what each philosophy meant

    • @sen5541
      @sen5541 2 роки тому +150

      @@sagarsrivastava1629 man u really think person who read 14 different types of Bible to study Christianity , person who read other constitutions of countries before building constitution of India , man with 2 PhD and Law degree , would read one single book by max muller and go burning it on mass scale that's stupid argument . Dr. Ambedkar didn't burn Gita, upanishads or vedas only Manuscript was burnt people should rather thank him for doing this

    • @sen5541
      @sen5541 2 роки тому +71

      @@sagarsrivastava1629 btw I agree with point heavy study should be conducted so we get know who started Sati , who never allowed womans in school, who was people got benefits from castism ( btw u know ans 😉) also who opposed when SavitriBai Phule started first school in India for womans , research must be conducted

    • @prashantpandey4518
      @prashantpandey4518 2 роки тому +31

      @@sen5541 bro bn rao is the first to draft indian constitution

  • @udip22
    @udip22 Рік тому +403

    Buddha is a gift to humanity!! No matter avatar of lord vishnu or not, all matters is his teachings!! And in anyways people are giving him lots of respect!! I believe in his teachings

    • @YashThapa-fd9whd
      @YashThapa-fd9whd Рік тому +7

      He wasn't an Avatar

    • @mazaaaya4283
      @mazaaaya4283 Рік тому +3

      It does matter and he was the avatar of Bhagwan Vishnu

    • @artisticthings7843
      @artisticthings7843 Рік тому +9

      He was not any avtar. He is a normal humam being like us but with practice he became enlightened as he found the end of suffering.❤
      No matter what hindus believe

    • @achintachakraborty347
      @achintachakraborty347 Рік тому +1

      ​@@artisticthings7843so was ram ... an ordinary human like us but still was an incarnation of lord vishnu 😅

    • @sorenutpal6091
      @sorenutpal6091 Рік тому

      Brahmanvadi propaganda, Brahmanize Buddha. Brahman religion is curse for India, did Buddhist genocide. Jai Periyar

  • @jignaaz8669
    @jignaaz8669 Рік тому +436

    I'm a Buddhist , following the ways and paths given by Buddha is really being useful in my daily life. I found peace and satisfaction in things I have

    • @anjalianangamanjari
      @anjalianangamanjari Рік тому +5

      that's not enought to have peace in the material life. And not go out of Samsara !!!

    • @crux666xxx
      @crux666xxx Рік тому +4

      Buddha's way is , gaining perfect knowledge of surrounding & self through meditation & end pain & sorrow with the power of that knowledge & being Victorious.
      Buddha taught only pure Logic.
      Now Buddhism is only for monks..
      But when it started , when Buddha was preaching, many Indian & Greek kings were his followers.

    • @WiserFirst
      @WiserFirst Рік тому +2

      @@crux666xxx it is there for peoples are well.... vipassana is been teach at vipassana centers

    • @sky_prism7379
      @sky_prism7379 Рік тому

      @@anjalianangamanjari get lost

    • @chetanmanik7770
      @chetanmanik7770 Рік тому +2

      Panchshila💙

  • @bharatchoudhary540
    @bharatchoudhary540 2 роки тому +373

    I don't think Buddha ever told that I'm starting a new religion .. a new teaching of course .. but every saint or sage in India did their own things .. about the same inner truth but with their own methods & teachings .. some would partially agree with traditions .. some majorly .. some wouldn't for the most part .. that's what makes Indian way of looking things so assuring.

    • @sagarsrivastava1629
      @sagarsrivastava1629 2 роки тому +30

      actually....mess started after the invasion occured coz if you study janism sanatan dharma and buddhism they are more like philosophy.....everyone has different perceptive...no one is forced to follow whats written and can be changed with time....but unlike religion phylodophies are unorganised so they made them religion
      and suprisingly....most of the ppl dont even know single thing about they beliefs and nor they want to.....ask a sanatani jain and buddhist (comman man) they know nothing but follow just coz there society says so 😔....no critical thinking

    • @zalayashpalsinh5427
      @zalayashpalsinh5427 2 роки тому +9

      Ya it was dharma not religion,there were rules and principle

    • @prateeknika2632
      @prateeknika2632 Рік тому +4

      "Buddha" is a title.
      Gautama Buddha
      And Bhagwan Buddha 2 alag log ha. Hindu dharm mein Bhagwan Buddha ha jo 5000 saal pehele the jabki Gautama Buddha 2500 saal pehele. Toh confused mat ho. Bodh dharm Gautama Buddha ka ha naki Bhagwan Buddha ka. So don't spread worng information.
      Btw I believe in nature like Gautama Buddha. I don't believe in god's..

    • @joebidenukrainian
      @joebidenukrainian Рік тому +1

      @@sagarsrivastava1629 yep they know nothing but jus follow there religon that is sick 😢
      I myself a hindu but i know buddhism Christianity but after knowing all of things I can say most of peoples don't follow that
      But there is one religon maybe you can know which religon am talking about we are happy that they follow there religon 😂 because I will be bad if they follow

    • @funwithrishi2817
      @funwithrishi2817 Рік тому +2

      Buddha said I established Dhamma chakra. Dhamma means dhrma. Dhamma is called religion.

  • @bhagabansethi1885
    @bhagabansethi1885 Рік тому +22

    Bhudha gives me the clamness
    Peace and contentment it shows me the direction in my life

  • @preyambarua801
    @preyambarua801 2 роки тому +526

    It does not really matter who was Buddha whether He was God or Man! What really matter is He is the Greatest preacher of peace. One does not has to by birth Buddhist to follow Buddha, does not need to change ones religion. Just follow Buddha's teaching if u like it or do not follow if u do not like it. If u follow Buddha's teaching u will be respected in this life and in after life if there is one really exists. Who Knows!

    • @rohansuyal5602
      @rohansuyal5602 2 роки тому +3

      Very good answer...

    • @vivekjasrotia5906
      @vivekjasrotia5906 2 роки тому +2

      Budha and krishna...both are the need of the human....

    • @frankfernandes718
      @frankfernandes718 2 роки тому +8

      same thing krishna preaches but he says to be in the world but dont get attached to worldly pleasures but buddha believes in complete sanyasi life

    • @HinduPhoenix
      @HinduPhoenix 2 роки тому +13

      @@chinyuenwong5342 Krishna didn't say to chant hare krishna...
      It's just his devotees who loves him and chant his holy name
      Hare Krishna

    • @HinduPhoenix
      @HinduPhoenix 2 роки тому +6

      @@chinyuenwong5342 you guys believe in atma or not?
      If not than how reincarnation works in your religion

  • @islamvirodhi3089
    @islamvirodhi3089 2 роки тому +303

    Gautam Buddha is not an Avatar of Shri Vishnu. It's Sugata Buddha who's avatar of Shri Vishnu. He's different person than Gautam Buddha.

    • @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792
      @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792 2 роки тому +51

      Correct Bhrāta 🦅
      It's Sugatha Buddha who is considered as Avatar of Maha Vishnu and not the Gautam Buddha one 😒
      Namaśthe 🕉️

    • @islamvirodhi3089
      @islamvirodhi3089 2 роки тому +21

      @@aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792 Yes Ik. This information must reach all those Hindus who say Gautam Buddha is Vishnu's avatar.

    • @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792
      @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792 2 роки тому +3

      @@islamvirodhi3089 Yes Bhrāta 🦅

    • @Soniworld
      @Soniworld 2 роки тому +5

      Exactly!

    • @navneetnair
      @navneetnair 2 роки тому +11

      Sugatha is another way to say Tathagatha which is a form in which the Buddha is addressed.

  • @abvyyii
    @abvyyii Рік тому +111

    The thing is lord buddha could be reincarnation of vishnu idk i haven't read scriptures but according to what I've understood is Siddharth Gautam or Gautam buddha was a common human who gained enlightenment and gained title "Buddha" lord buddha actually realized how this world works, what is life and many more while meditating everyone can be buddha theres no such things as reincarnation if you meditate long enough with right methods you can gain complete control over your mind and thought and finally gain enlightenment and get title "buddha"

    • @Ankitcse913
      @Ankitcse913 Рік тому +2

      you have not read full story - when SIDHHARTH (budh) was in her mother's body (before birth) , a HINDU priest in his father's palace already predicted and told his father that ,his son will leave his palace and will become monk

    • @abvyyii
      @abvyyii Рік тому +5

      @@Ankitcse913 Bro first of all he's a boy, He predicted he'll either be a chakravarti raja or a monk, being a monk doesn't automatically make you buddha you're clearly not getting my point

    • @aniket385
      @aniket385 Рік тому

      Buddhist texts themselves write „“The Buddha is Narayan itself“ . Now does it refer to deity Narayan or Nar= man and Yana=water and purity which equates to man of purity is the debate .

    • @abvyyii
      @abvyyii Рік тому +4

      @@aniket385 Oh and which text is that?
      According to you lets say buddha was reincarnation of Narayan then why did he make his own religion?
      Well we don't know what is the truth being a Hindu i respect the buddha as a normal person who gained enlightenment because of his meditation and not enlightenment because he was reincarnation of narayan

    • @allhdmoviescene1294
      @allhdmoviescene1294 Рік тому +1

      wtf. buddha believes in reincarnation therefore he shows us the path to enlightenment.

  • @Ghisingg381
    @Ghisingg381 2 роки тому +117

    As A Buddhist By Born We have Learnt from Our Buddhism Tibetan masters An From Scriptures That Lord Shakyamuni Buddha is not avatar of Lord Vishnu Lord Buddha is The Manifestation of Amitabha Buddha Sangay Hopame An Before Shakyamuni Buddha there was Dipankar Tathagatta Buddha An Current Buddha Is Shakyamuni Buddha who was Born In Shakya Lineage From Chettri Nepali Family In Lumbini Before Shakyamuni Buddha there was million of Buddha n main Five Buddhas r Amitabha Ratnasambhava Amoghasiddhi Akshobhya an Vairochana an Buddhism path Is Madhyamarg Buddha Dharma Sangha Mahayana Buddhism is different an Vajrayana Buddhism is far different different school an masters An Buddhist also contribute in Daan Karuna Ahinsa Love Bon Culture in Tibet Was Shamanism culture After Guru Rinpochey went to Tibet An Convert bon Culture in Buddhism

    • @FromPlanetZX
      @FromPlanetZX 2 роки тому +13

      You do know, these are added accounts by Tibet monks and Lamas, not the actual Indian ones.
      After Gautama died, it was brahmins only who were his followers, started propagating with added accounts.
      Only Tripitak can be considered as real, authentic accounts of Buddha, but sadly written many centuries after his demise, rest accounts are interpolations.
      The delusion is so gr8 that:
      A Thai professor has written a paper with more than 200 references, claiming Gautama was a Thai national.
      Then Sri Lanka has top this lunacy, by going to International Court claiming Gautama was born in Sri Lanka.

    • @Ghisingg381
      @Ghisingg381 2 роки тому +6

      @@FromPlanetZX it Doesn't matter what people of Thai Say Buddha was born in Lumbini Nepal From Shakya Lineage so Lord Buddha Gave 84000. Speeches Of Knowledge Repeat after repeat than The Tripitak Book was Written all his 84000 teaches we're written First Vinay Pithak Avidharma Pithak An Sutra The After Lord Buddha Mahaparinirvana BODDHISATTVAS Came To Earth An Again They Rewrite all his Speeches Then After Guru Rinpochey came An He Gave All The Teachings of Buddha An Vajrayana teachings An One Thing Buddhism Tantra Is Not From Hinduism Tantra Buddha Himself Given The Knowledge of Sutra An Tantra Of Kalachakra an Chakrasamvara Tantra

    • @shivamshaw3590
      @shivamshaw3590 2 роки тому +5

      @@Ghisingg381 what about Tara being worshipped both in Tibetan Buddhism and Hinduism??

    • @prashantsingh1280
      @prashantsingh1280 2 роки тому +6

      @@Ghisingg381 Shakya lineage is Sub clan of Ishvaku the lineage of Lord Rama. Buddha himself had many time proudly bragged about his ishvaku lineage

    • @chabmondetosen4622
      @chabmondetosen4622 2 роки тому +3

      @@Ghisingg381 you say Buddha was born in Nepal it just because of political issue. And people must not forget that thousand of years ago there was no Nepal. So people should not give the credit of the birth place. May be you think like but i dont because for me Buddha was born on this earth.

  • @KARLGAMING-KARLKENT
    @KARLGAMING-KARLKENT Рік тому +129

    I'm a Buddhist and obvious sanatani, it's just my believe that Buddha was leela of lord himself to change the yuga and spread a message that a man must not believe in God and believe his own brain and be at the side of peace. Just a believe and a thought generated in my mind ❤
    Jai shree govind 💛

    • @Majnubhai444
      @Majnubhai444 Рік тому +3

      Covert ho jao phir😌

    • @achintachakraborty347
      @achintachakraborty347 Рік тому +6

      ​@@Majnubhai444lol there IS no conversation in Hinduism 😊😊

    • @anonymous-uq6fj
      @anonymous-uq6fj Рік тому +5

      Yes I have the same beliefs, lord buddha was no less than a miracle, but in today's world if any God comes to us he obviously won't go around telling I'm God worship me y'all, in this yuga people were blindly following whatever in the name of religion, they used to kill innocent animals just to please god, casteism was getting extreme, people started to lie, bluff, greed was increasing, buddha taught us what we needed to follow to live a life full of peace and lead us people of this yuga to the right path🙏🏻

    • @sorenutpal6091
      @sorenutpal6091 Рік тому

      Brahmanvadi propaganda, Brahmanize Buddha. Brahman religion is curse for India, did Buddhist genocide. Jai Periyar

    • @mamatapandey6073
      @mamatapandey6073 Рік тому

      even gayatri mantra gives utmost importance to your intellectual...

  • @palwinder_kaler
    @palwinder_kaler 2 роки тому +503

    I'm Sikh and I have bhudha wallpaper in my phone , so that I can see his calm and peaceful all the times which brings happiness and calmness to busy and frustrating life. But I do believe bhudha is not incarnation of lord Vishnu

    • @therapeuticsoundsofnature2006
      @therapeuticsoundsofnature2006 2 роки тому +53

      Well Bro your Dasam granth does mentions Vishnu's , Brahma's and Shiva's avatars ....Buddhavamsa a Buddhist text mentions Buddha to be born in IKSHVAKU DYNASTY . Jataka Tales which is basically folk commentaries on Buddha in his past life mentions him as Krishna , Ram etc

    • @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792
      @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792 2 роки тому +34

      Bro
      It's Sugatha Buddha who is considered as Avatar of Maha Vishnu and not the Gautam Buddha one 😒
      Namaśthe 🕉️

    • @Soniworld
      @Soniworld 2 роки тому +4

      Me too

    • @Testlavlog
      @Testlavlog 2 роки тому +6

      As you wish.i want to say gurugranth sahed mentioned Shivling in mecca by Gurunanak. What your thinking about that? I only know

    • @palwinder_kaler
      @palwinder_kaler 2 роки тому

      @@Testlavlog i never read so I am not right person to comment

  • @palwinder_kaler
    @palwinder_kaler 2 роки тому +43

    Buddhism is way ahead of that time and we as humans still not ready for Buddhism, Buddhism is religion of future when people will intelligent, peacefully, educated and scientifically understandable. Just look at the teaching of bhudha you wil find today's world still not ready for this. Coz we are violent , hatefull, jealous,greedy and frustrating from present situation.

    • @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792
      @aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792 2 роки тому +9

      Spread this Buddhist ideology in border as well 😁
      Sanatana Dharma is the only Dharma which says about satva , Rajasic and Tamasic Qualities....
      Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
      Dharma Himsa Tathaiva cha ⚔️
      Namaśthe 🕉️

    • @nowwhat6716
      @nowwhat6716 2 роки тому +2

      @@aadithyanc.koccupyandcolon6792 and the Santana word U keep saying is first used to describe qualities of Buddhism. Santana is quality not religion.

    • @Ezioauditore0098
      @Ezioauditore0098 Рік тому

      ​@@nowwhat6716kuch bhi mat bak

    • @rajansonvane488
      @rajansonvane488 Рік тому

      True !!

    • @saikatbaug1937
      @saikatbaug1937 7 місяців тому

      ​@@nowwhat6716 Vedanta is a future religion

  • @prasitbarua658
    @prasitbarua658 2 роки тому +117

    Buddhism did not adopted the philosophies of china, japan, sri lanka or tibet,as time has passed the people of those countries have mixed there own culture and philosophies with the philosophies of Buddhism.

    • @Rakshit_Pandey
      @Rakshit_Pandey 2 роки тому +6

      Buddhism is influenced by Upanishads.

    • @utkarshchannel8
      @utkarshchannel8 2 роки тому +3

      Yeah it is it

    • @HinduPhoenix
      @HinduPhoenix 2 роки тому +10

      @@Rakshit_Pandey Buddhism is opposite to Upnishads..
      Upnishad say there is not two atma but Buddhist say that there is no atma..
      I don't understand if there is no atma they how the hell there in reincarnation stories of Buddha in Buddhism 🤣🤣

    • @Rakshit_Pandey
      @Rakshit_Pandey 2 роки тому +1

      @@HinduPhoenix contradiction

    • @nuppanuppa
      @nuppanuppa Рік тому +3

      @@HinduPhoenix learn more about buddhism. while gautam buddha is guru. whatever spread with him in east was culture, like mantra, maala, statues, that hand gesture we do while we pray, god yama, there lots of thing. thing about it logically buddha was teacher. with buddha indian culture transferred too.

  • @Jayasinghe_family
    @Jayasinghe_family Рік тому +31

    Loved this video but I need to point out some mistakes - 1) you don't need to be a sanyasi to attain enlightenment according to Buddha. Buddha admitted that he could have attained Nirvana without being a sanyasi and he became a Sanyasi because he thought it was requirement. In fact there were many lay people during Buddha's time that attained Nirvana. He ADMITTED he was wrong. 2) But he realized that for Buddhism to survive for a long time there has to be monks/Sangas. This is why he continues with the Sanga tradition.

    • @vindati4825
      @vindati4825 11 місяців тому

      Agree. He was growing in his spiritual journey throughout his life. In Buddhism it is believed that householders are as much a Bodhisattvaa as a monk who renounced everything. They both served a unique purpose in this world.

  • @mayankvaid1436
    @mayankvaid1436 2 роки тому +314

    Gautama Buddha wasn't a incarnation of lord Vishnu. Sugatha budhha was a Vishnu avatar. Ranveer please bring puri shankaracharya if possible it will help you understand religion better

    • @vishalsalve5641
      @vishalsalve5641 2 роки тому +11

      Exactly 🌃

    • @aryanshukla4226
      @aryanshukla4226 2 роки тому +6

      Yess right

    • @frankfernandes718
      @frankfernandes718 2 роки тому +3

      everyone who helps people to get reed of the sufferings is a vishnu avtaar, explain how is Parshuram a vishnu avtaar?

    • @mayankvaid1436
      @mayankvaid1436 2 роки тому +29

      @@frankfernandes718 lord Vishnu comes down on earth to establish dharma. Before lord parshuram came on earth Kshatriyas were not doing their job properly and were being adharmic and was led by sahastra bahu named kshatriya king. That is the reason why lord Vishnu came on earth as parshuram and destroyed all crooked kshatriyas except newborns and women. And also he was not a full incarnation. It does not necessarily mean peace and all is dharma sometimes one has to be violent to save dharma. Lord parshuram is a perfect example of it. Yes budhha was a saint in ancient India who had his own ideology but that doesn't make him a Vishnu avatar. Sugatha budhha was a Vishnu avatar

    • @aryanshukla4226
      @aryanshukla4226 2 роки тому +11

      @@frankfernandes718 he killed sahastrabahu and many adharmk kshatriyas of haheya vansh nd got the people rid of the evil kings.. so pls nikaliye yahan se rice bag walo se humare religious scriptures pr opinion nahi chaiye

  • @3xyzful
    @3xyzful 2 роки тому +51

    Shakyamuni wrote the last Sutra - titled the Lotus Sutra for all of us living in this age. It teaches one how to reach enlightement or your Buddhahood within without having to give up your earthly pleasures/desires. How to be happy despite our challenges and how to make others happy. Doesn't matter what teaching or path you follow, all are trying to guide you in the same direction. Once you "get it" and live by wisdom, courage, compassion...with good thoughts good words and good deeds....you will be the best version of yourself...and connected to your higher self.

    • @prateekkhanal1980
      @prateekkhanal1980 2 роки тому +3

      Namo Sadhdharma Pundarikaya Sutra 🙏🙏🙏

    • @kajalpawaskar7742
      @kajalpawaskar7742 2 роки тому +1

      Are you talking about Nichiren Buddhism

    • @2112WELLWISHER
      @2112WELLWISHER 2 роки тому +1

      The middle way is the crux of the teaching of lotus sutra and complete beleif in ones enlightened state i.e buddhahood and the same is mentioned by the orator in the end on the video..!!!

    • @media-rn6zc
      @media-rn6zc 2 роки тому +1

      Many Saints who attained spiritual heights never believed in any avatar. Aham brahmasmi, I am a part of brahma is the ultimate reality of sanatan dharm

    • @TheGuiltsOfUs
      @TheGuiltsOfUs Рік тому +1

      The lotus sutra can not be traced to the historical shakyamuni, cults based around that text are on the same level as mormonism.

  • @gauravbk2931
    @gauravbk2931 2 роки тому +108

    Buddhism was spreading so fast so people from hindu community specially brahmins started calling him incarnation but buddhist know buddha never believed in god nor in prayers nor he mentioned anything about any hindu god,

    • @Nanded12345
      @Nanded12345 2 роки тому +10

      But didn't dashavathar already said that there will be a guy called Buddha who will be avatar of Vishnu .

    • @gauravbk2931
      @gauravbk2931 2 роки тому

      @@Nanded12345 scriptures of hindu religion is made by humans far after buddhism, because if hinduism was there in buddhas time buddha would mentioned any of hindu god or name but he didnt ,
      And bythe way buddhist don't believe in avtar also,i dont understand how people believe in avtars, there are 1000 other religions in the world biliions dont even know the hindu god but are they living worst life no but they are living very better life than indians

    • @tanvi3951
      @tanvi3951 Рік тому +26

      Neo buddhist ho😂.
      Hindus buddha ki respect karte hai par neo buddhist ko hinduism ki respect krne se bdi prblm hai😂....

    • @dedsec7543
      @dedsec7543 Рік тому +7

      We do respect your hindu religion Brother. But it doesn't mean that we believe your concept of avtar. We don't hate your Hinduism.
      I just need an explanation for Only thing, why Mr Yogi aditya nath always represent only buddha to the world, and not Vishnu as the head of the Avatars. Why he always represent very small, weak and atheist person (vishnu avtar) always.

    • @devilbeast6010
      @devilbeast6010 Рік тому +5

      @@dedsec7543 because it is written in shastras of that buddha is an avatar of lord vishnu

  • @Native_love
    @Native_love Рік тому +8

    Very good conversation! As a Native American of the Navajo tribe, I thank you for this. Thank you!

  • @nitinchauhan1909
    @nitinchauhan1909 2 роки тому +212

    As a hindu , I never considered bhgwan budhha as someone who belongs to other religion.
    This whole chao is created by social media other wise every hindu in india venerates and worship budha
    Jai shree ram
    Namo buddhay 🙏🙏🙏

    • @damnroten
      @damnroten 2 роки тому +23

      Damn, i love when I found such hindu people believe me brother, large no. Hindus are just Manipulated, I hope people find peace in their own religion someday

    • @nitinchauhan1909
      @nitinchauhan1909 2 роки тому +23

      @@damnroten no brother.
      Sometimes what appears is not reality .
      Don't believe on social media activities.
      Indian villages and towns and their people worship budhha similar to other hindu gods
      Believe me 🙏

    • @myisl5638
      @myisl5638 2 роки тому +5

      @@nitinchauhan1909 hehehe,, you ahve to study bro .. 😁😁😁.. when you read Buddhist book .. tum khud par hasoge .. ab tak yehi dhoka kiya jaa-raha he .. both are totally different .. gautma budh ne kahn he .. jo maine kahan he, vohi stye he , jo dharam ke bare kahan gaya he . vo astye he .. mai hi stye hu, mai hi sanatan hu .. jis ne bhi dharam ke bare me kahan he, jis ne bhi suna he.. vo sab astye he .. mere hi shabdh stye he ..
      bhagvan gautam buddh ke samye gita tha, ya nahi tha, ye ek saval bana he .. gautam buddh ke kahani me, gita ka aur shiv puran ke bare me kuch bhi nahi likha gaya he.. jaise islam ka relation Jesus ke sath juda he ..
      . un ka koi bhi guru nahi tha..gautm buddha bhagvan dhyan se gyna ko prapt kiya tha .. ek padhna jarur buddh ke bare me .. bhai ..

    • @nitinchauhan1909
      @nitinchauhan1909 2 роки тому +7

      @@myisl5638 par buddhist literature "sutta pitak" me likha hai- kshatriya is the highest and most pure varna followed by brahmin and then vaishya

    • @myisl5638
      @myisl5638 2 роки тому +1

      @@nitinchauhan1909 konsa adhaye mai likha he.. vedic se lekar verdant tak karm pe adharait likha hai.. aap ko Buddhist itihas kar se mil na chahiye.. Indus valley civilization me, sankriti kiu nahi mila.. sankriti kahan se aaya he. Saval banta he.. ab tak hindu dharam kahan se aaya he. Is baat par saval bana he... agar hindu the, Indus valley civilization me, sabut kiu nahi mile... saval bhot khada hota he... Buddhist me bhagvan ka shabdh he hi nahi.. every one's is God kahna he..

  • @LucidX94
    @LucidX94 Рік тому +61

    Who think buddha is not avtar of vishnu, he is enlighted being ❤

    • @gyangsingye9812
      @gyangsingye9812 Рік тому +2

      Vishnu is not enlightenment

    • @Radhe-668
      @Radhe-668 Рік тому +6

      @@gyangsingye9812 Vishnu is enlightenment

    • @artisticthings7843
      @artisticthings7843 Рік тому +1

      @@Radhe-668No

    • @SahilYesankar-n7c
      @SahilYesankar-n7c 5 місяців тому +1

      Buddhism me hi avatar hai ....sub vhi se liya hai ....even apko kalki avatar bhi mil jayenge ....mahakal bhi

    • @midnightstories6619
      @midnightstories6619 Місяць тому +1

      I believe he was a regular person who attained "Moksha" or as Buddhists think "Nirvana". So, ultimately he was able to become enlightenment and be one with Vishnu...

  • @iamvishal5258
    @iamvishal5258 8 місяців тому +7

    Indian history is battle between buddhists and aryans - Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
    Buddha is a human , not god gautham sidhartha become buddha after enlightenment

  • @blessedkomal6
    @blessedkomal6 Рік тому +16

    Buddha never told to leave everything and go .. his teachings is live with good thoughts, love everyone, don’t lie, don’t kill anyone, earn money in right way , do exercise, control your emotions through meditation, don’t hurt anyone, etc.. so that you anyone can live this life happily without any suffering.. his teachings is simple so that everyone can understand it .. please don’t make it complicated..

    • @rumouristic
      @rumouristic 7 місяців тому +1

      Dont depend on money for happiness ! Ye hai sahi..

  • @tivo3720
    @tivo3720 2 роки тому +29

    I don't understand what's the problem of some Buddhists..... If hindus respect the Buddha ....
    Hindus are respecting him .... Learning about him, ..... Not like others who are destroying Buddhists temples and statutes in afganistan.
    In Bodh Gaya.... Muslim attacked to show their support towards Rohingyas.

    • @nowwhat6716
      @nowwhat6716 2 роки тому

      Problem is at that time it's written as attack on Buddhism. It's mention in the scripture that Vishnu will reincarnate as Buddha to mislead people. And also these scriptures are written much later after death several centuries after Buddha

    • @tivo3720
      @tivo3720 2 роки тому

      @@nowwhat6716 Where it is written that Visnu will reincarnate as Buddha to
      "" mislead "" people can you show or mention huh ???
      Buddhism born from Hinduism .... Not like hinduism born from Buddhism lol .
      Buddhists stole lord Brahma, Visnu and Shiva , Ganesh and Tara from hindus ....
      Better to except it and show some respect to ur origin .

    • @sh-pn4fv
      @sh-pn4fv 2 роки тому +4

      True

    • @pierreacademics5397
      @pierreacademics5397 2 роки тому +13

      Respecting? Or spreading false information

    • @oniyou622
      @oniyou622 2 роки тому +4

      @@pierreacademics5397 trueee

  • @mrdrj4036
    @mrdrj4036 2 роки тому +122

    Buddha : I'm an Atheist, I don't believe in God
    Others : You're a theist, You're God

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +58

      And made him 'avatar of Hinduism' that he himself never said/claimed.

    • @mrdrj4036
      @mrdrj4036 Рік тому +10

      @@su-mu exactly brother

    • @ani4502
      @ani4502 Рік тому +6

      Buddha was the biggest believer because...at that time nastik means someone who don't believe in Vedas(law of Karma)...but today meaning of nastik became atheist....

    • @weebie2633
      @weebie2633 Рік тому +5

      Bro You have completely misunderstood his teachings.
      Buddha was neither atheist nor theist

    • @mrdrj4036
      @mrdrj4036 Рік тому +2

      @@weebie2633 agreed 👍🏻

  • @Indusxstan
    @Indusxstan Рік тому +20

    I liked the anchor's take on Buddhism, it's very relevant to a lot of well-educated Hindus.

  • @Podcasts671
    @Podcasts671 Рік тому +28

    In Buddhism, no one is saying you to leave everything & start sadhna. That's the whole essence of the Middle Path that you don't get into extremism...
    It teaches you how to do your sadhna while being on material world.

    • @bikashdas3146
      @bikashdas3146 Рік тому +1

      there are middle path in Hinduism as well and many ways in fact..whats so new? from extreme to simple life style all path shown in Hinduism..and dont say that extremism is not there in Buddhism, there are buddhist monks doing tough meditation as well..

    • @theempress4920
      @theempress4920 Рік тому

      @@bikashdas3146 your hindusim sucks 😂 it's 20000 gods and it's still not enough that you are pulling other religious Gods and telling they are Vishnu avatar....so embarrassing...have so respect for Hindu religion

    • @prashantrajput3429
      @prashantrajput3429 8 місяців тому

      ​@@theempress4920stop barking non sense on social and read the scriptures which are thousands of years old you'll find the evidences of who's avatar or not🤡

  • @ForwardRitesh
    @ForwardRitesh Рік тому +38

    Lots of major temples in India were once associated with Buddha and Buddhism. So we still worship Buddha in the name of different gods.

    • @tanujgupta8576
      @tanujgupta8576 Рік тому +1

      And that was destroyed by mughals along with hindu temples and it was fact that sanatan dharma always in a majority in ancient india

    • @staywaybicthws________
      @staywaybicthws________ Рік тому +1

      we don't "worship" budha.. I mean he is just a human being after all .. I respect his teachings a lot and follow them too but he ain't no god..❤God is the one supreme being, creator of this samsara so there's no comparison

    • @aadijha777
      @aadijha777 Рік тому +2

      During mauryan era Buddhism was on Peak but declined after fall of mauryan emlire and Destroyed during shunga empire -established by pushya mitra shunga whoo was Orthodox brahmin

  • @ashusings176
    @ashusings176 2 роки тому +127

    I am not interested in any sort of debate whether Buddha was or wasn't an incarnation of Lord Vishnu .....Both theory should exist parallelly because that's the beauty of our Indic culture.

    • @HinduPhoenix
      @HinduPhoenix 2 роки тому

      बुद्ध अवतार थे लेकिन वो बुरे लोगों को हमारे धर्म से बालगलाने आए थे। मतलब बुद्धिस्ट लोग असुर हैं🤣🤣

    • @ItsMe-ol1tr
      @ItsMe-ol1tr 2 роки тому +6

      Exactly

    • @sagarsrivastava1629
      @sagarsrivastava1629 2 роки тому +2

      actually buddha is a kind of title.....and there are ton of ppl named buddha and gautam buddha was born in lubini and for vishnu avatar was sugata buddha.....
      main problem is peaple dont urge to have critical thinking nor they research on what they heard.....what society says just follow
      lasty....Peaple ☕

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +1

      So, you don't want to know what really happened?

    • @anjalianangamanjari
      @anjalianangamanjari Рік тому

      The point is that there abc (Buddha Teaching) and then the all alphabet (Bhagavad Gita and Bhagavatam God teaching) purpose of humain life is go back to God not just get some knowledge of peace of mind .then u choose.blessings Namaste'

  • @Rthui
    @Rthui 7 місяців тому +2

    Shri Krishna Ji Changed my life completely...now I'm in a family situation even then I'm living very peacefully, lovingly, and doing my Sadhana everyday. Shri Krishna Teachings are not against life but just living gracefully 😊❤❤
    Shri Krishna Govind Hare Murari Hey Nath Narayan Vasudeva 🎉

  • @subalsarkar1734
    @subalsarkar1734 Рік тому +56

    Hinduism, buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism= Sanatan dharma 🚩

  • @sharadasamarawickrama6794
    @sharadasamarawickrama6794 2 роки тому +43

    As a theravada Buddhist, The teaching of Lord buddha define how we stop the sansara,,,
    Which mean rebirth.. According to loard buddha we have infinity rebirth.. Our "thanha"is the basic need for rebirth.. When we zero the 'thanha' we will not be rebirth.. We can escape all the 'dukya'

    • @prakxyz
      @prakxyz Рік тому

      It fails abrahmic religions are at you door

    • @AudioMixedVideoAMV
      @AudioMixedVideoAMV Рік тому +9

      so basically attain moksha and end the cycle of rebirth?

    • @minthura9053
      @minthura9053 Рік тому +3

      ​@@AudioMixedVideoAMV its different. Attaining moksha means you transcend beyond the forms and illusions and atman becomes one with Brahman. In the Buddhist sense, there is no atman. Nibanna(Nirvana) means blowing out or ceasing. The process of death and rebirth ceases. That's it.

    • @AudioMixedVideoAMV
      @AudioMixedVideoAMV Рік тому +5

      @@minthura9053 damn I see. Its interesting to know how simillar yet so different these two dharmas are

    • @sorenutpal6091
      @sorenutpal6091 Рік тому

      Brahmanvadi propaganda, Brahmanize Buddha. Brahman religion is curse for India, did Buddhist genocide. Jai Periyar

  • @vehlan
    @vehlan Рік тому +10

    I born as Hindu. But grasped Buddhism based on my own interest and inspiration. Buddha called him as Thatagatha. That's means he followed foot steps and preached same as previous Buddha's teachings. He mentioned many rebirth about himself (Sakyamuni Buddha) and other Buddhas. So, there is no link between Sakyamuni Buddha and Hinduism. Hindus made up a story that Buddha is Vishnu Avatar. The reason is Hinduism fame get reduced because Buddhism dont believe caste system and everyone treated as same. Another reason there is no function for Brahmin act as middle man to do rituals to connect god with human. Buddha dont believe in rituals. Everyone must be treated same. No one become great based on family backgroud. Only through character, we should judge, whether there are respecful person or not. Buddha said if u work hard u can be whoever u want in this birth and future births. Buddha's teaching called as Dhamma is universal code of conduct to end rebirths sufferings. So, there is no link between Hinduism and Buddhism. Siddharta Gautama (Buddha) against Hinduism concepts and rituals since he was child. Please reveal the truth. Dont hide ultimate wise knowledge of Buddha's teachings.

    • @tanujgupta8576
      @tanujgupta8576 Рік тому

      But i believe in hinduism bec un like you i don't want to ignore my culture and adopt other

    • @vehlan
      @vehlan Рік тому

      @@tanujgupta8576 I don't believe in culture. I believe in righteousness. If Buddha believe in culture, the world won't able to understand what is the path to end sufferings.

    • @tanujgupta8576
      @tanujgupta8576 Рік тому +1

      @@vehlan thousands year old before budha our lord krishna gave a right path to huminaty and budha do same but impacts of krishna on bharat was great and he gave us bhagwat geeta so we hindus trying to follow gitawe don't need budha's thinking budha was not the first who did this and thats why today also krishna ram is still is our cultural beliefs than budha and people all around the world always jeolous to hindu heritage and tried to create false narrative of hindu gods vs bodh

    • @vehlan
      @vehlan Рік тому

      @tanujgupta8576 Good luck. 👍

    • @tanujgupta8576
      @tanujgupta8576 Рік тому +1

      @@vehlanit seems truth hit hard

  • @normalhuman-h18
    @normalhuman-h18 Рік тому +13

    I never considered buddha as from other religion. Whatever people say but i always worship bhagwaan buddha and follow his teachings no matter what religion i am following. Om Namo Buddhaye . Jai shri Krishna 🙏🙏😊

  • @tunduptsering5686
    @tunduptsering5686 Рік тому +3

    "Buddhism does not demand asceticism from all Buddhists; it is a choice. It talks about four groups of people: monks, nuns, male devotees, and female devotees. One can achieve Nibbana, the ultimate freedom, in all these different forms of life. There were countless enlightened householders in the time of the Buddha."

  • @chopellepcha7867
    @chopellepcha7867 Рік тому +2

    Buddha was a human being, who later became an enlightened spiritual being, neglecting attachment, zero anger and awakening from ignorance.
    He just do have protectors, who are also an enlightened being as well.
    Like, his power is that of Vajrapani.
    His knowledge is that of Manjushri.
    His compassion level is that of Avalokitiswara.

  • @은우1401
    @은우1401 2 роки тому +19

    I follow Buddha and Shiva both. Namoh Buddhayo, Namoh Shivayo.

  • @madaxo_03
    @madaxo_03 2 роки тому +3

    Lord Buddha is not incarnation of any god , actually he didn't believe in Gods and incarnation. Lord Buddha was a straight and pure thinker.
    🙏💙 बुद्धं शरणं गच्छामी 💙🙏

    • @prakxyz
      @prakxyz Рік тому

      Which buddha ?

  • @FoxtrotIndia
    @FoxtrotIndia 2 роки тому +38

    Hii TRS we have an old rock temple in North India, Himachal. It is an old Ram temple partially broken in a massive earthquake in 1905 but the main structure still survived. In this old monolithic temple there is a Buddha face statue carved on the main shikara Or the vimana of the temple. So at least this shows there is an association between Hinduism and Buddhism Or at least the people who constructed it and the King believed in this. The temple is still there and looked after by ASI and I have pics of the same.

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +2

      Wait a minute. You found Buddha face statue carved on the wall of an 'old/broken Ram monolithic temple?' You need to dig a little deeper to understand 'statue of Buddha in a Ram mandir.' Did the ASI release any findings or was it the end of story?
      By the way, could you please upload pictures somewhere public?

    • @FoxtrotIndia
      @FoxtrotIndia Рік тому +5

      @@su-mu I tried to know more on the subject. And I found Buddha is considered as one of the DashaAvtars of Lord Vishnu in Hinduism. As per ASI the temple was built by King of Kannauj (surprisingly - in a remote hilly jungle of Himachal) but the local legend says something else and dates other structures in the vicinity back to Mahabharata era and even this temple made by Pandvas. As per the story the temple was left incomplete because the identity of Pandvas got disclosed during Agyatvaas and therefore had to run away. The main Ram, Laxman and Sita idols were placed later. There is also an engraving written on rock wall at the entrance of main temple in an ancient Indian language which is still uncoded and not understood by ASI as per my info. Astonishingly and to Highlight this magnificent ancient temple is a monolithic rock cut temple which means entire temple complex with 13-15 vimanas is made of single rock in this case Sandstone.The cluster resembles Sumeru. It also has a beautiful pond in front of her and is part of temple just like ancient South Indian temples.

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +2

      @@FoxtrotIndia Wow, you wrote a lot. Is there anyway you can take pictures? I am sorry to inconvenience you like this.

    • @FoxtrotIndia
      @FoxtrotIndia Рік тому +3

      @@su-mu I have the pics but I will try to get it more prominently I visit next time and get hold of local priest also. But I can surely tell you if I am able to identify Lord Shiva, Indra, Kartikeya, Durga, Brahma etc I can surely identify Buddha face. Unless they were making statue of some other deity resembling Buddha in those times.

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +1

      forget about pictures if too far from where you are.

  • @giferedits7304
    @giferedits7304 2 роки тому +7

    Buddha was enlighted man that's all but some hindus considered him as incarnation of god but he is not . But if you want to believe you can no problem . I like him very much . Teaching same thing but with different style of teaching same thing .

  • @tusharshetty5503
    @tusharshetty5503 2 роки тому +12

    Buddha is indeed an avatāra of Visņu. But it wasn't Siddhartha Gautama Buddha. There have been many Buddha's before Siddhartha Gautama and will be several more in future.
    The 9th Avatāra of Visņu is Sugata Buddha. According to Vaiṣṇava Bhagavata Purāṇam, the ninth avatāra was born immediately after the beginning of Kaliyuga in the city of Gaya. We know that Siddhartha Gautama was born atleast 2500 years after the beginning of Kaliyuga in Lumbini, hundreds of kilometre away from Gaya.
    The Buddha mentioned as avatāra of Visnu is different than Siddhartha Gautama. Due to latter's immense popularity among masses, "some" acharyas who opposed Buddhism appropriated Siddhartha Gautama as avatāra.

  • @manishmall4407
    @manishmall4407 8 місяців тому +1

    I am hindu but have highly respect for Buddha because he is historic icon of Jambudweep not mythological. Any Bhartiya ignoring Buddha means ignoring bhartiya sanskriti. Maximum path/tradition of Bharat derived from Buddhism.

  • @shazzam9982
    @shazzam9982 Рік тому +9

    Ambedkar ji bola ki hinduism se koi relation nahi hai Buddha ka ,to mtlb nhi hai ...🫡😂it's ok
    U haven't understand the texts then, even ur budhhist texts ,
    One line -learn about dalae lama
    I'm a kattar hindu...and too follow Buddha path of enlightenment which is similar to what Yogi culture in Hinduism 🌹

    • @adityaranjan3396
      @adityaranjan3396 Рік тому +2

      Bilkul sahi😂👍

    • @artisticthings7843
      @artisticthings7843 Рік тому +1

      fir to nakli jadu tona me bhi beleive krega to dhongi baba me

    • @ChandelAditya27
      @ChandelAditya27 2 місяці тому

      Kon krta h in sb mai 500 pehle saal pehle pahuch gya kya bhidu​@@artisticthings7843

  • @nagsenpandit3150
    @nagsenpandit3150 2 роки тому +8

    Buddha Will be misunderstood in India, You can't understand Buddha until u became note this 🥱🖤

  • @clips5136
    @clips5136 2 роки тому +4

    Basically if you can control yourself, you can achieve everything in your life 💖

  • @parag1193
    @parag1193 2 роки тому +14

    There's very less study about Buddhist tradition from Buddha, In Tipitakka - The Jataka Katha section and many surtas/ suttas have guided civilised people as well, if you see the Buddha gave 5 sila for common people, but tor monks they have 117 rules.
    It was never a tradition to make everyone a sanyasi neither did everyone became a sanyasi, household ppl also followed the teachings of Buddha without being a sanyasi
    Buddhism was lost majorly because it speaks about following and doing efforts , only for monks all the details are explained
    We as human we love to listen, talk about spiritualism but we don't practice
    In Buddhist teachings it is doing not talking, hence got lost
    How can teachings of all the sages, divine souls, gods can clash if it is all about one aim and one universe

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +1

      You are close, but need to dig a little deeper to understand Buddhism.

    • @truthtobetold9915
      @truthtobetold9915 Рік тому

      They do not clash.... humans clash 🙏
      did u find budhha asking to leave other religions?
      Did you listen, when he says middle path,
      It implies, there are extreme paths also.
      That means buddhism is only 1 of way to enlightenment, and not necessity.
      People clash with each other, enlightened beings do not.

  • @nowwhat6716
    @nowwhat6716 2 роки тому +20

    All those mention of Buddha are written 100s years later 😂. Some in very negative light. It like doing vabishyawani of past in the future 😂. Ranveer why don't U invite the people who actually know about Buddhism

    • @nirajtayde8260
      @nirajtayde8260 2 роки тому +7

      Bcz we don't give such analogy.. we don't believe that their is any sort of atma.. one thing you'll notice they(ranveer+his like minded people) don't discuss about Buddha's principles, they'll subtly throw their thing parallel..
      Bas avatar boldo to paraya mal apna..

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому +6

      Perfect. Both guest and host are either completely ignorant or just outright liars.

    • @prashantrajput3429
      @prashantrajput3429 8 місяців тому

      ​@@nirajtayde8260I heard reincarnations exist in Buddhism is it true??

  • @liptonbarua1757
    @liptonbarua1757 3 місяці тому +1

    I Am A Buddhist.I Have Many Hindu Friends,What I Feel About Hindus Is, They Consider Buddhist As Their Own Brother.I Know There Are Minor Differences But Instead Of Focusing On Minor Differences,We Should Be Focusing On Major Similarities.Namo Buddha ☸️❤Hare Krishna.🕉️

  • @rinkulahre1698
    @rinkulahre1698 Рік тому +6

    It matters that what and who Buddha was, it's subject to identity 😊

  • @subhankarsanatani1230
    @subhankarsanatani1230 2 роки тому +17

    We North eastern Hindu strongly believe bhagwan Buddha is a avtar of Hari.
    Sadhu Sadhu 🙏

    • @almightystar5395
      @almightystar5395 2 роки тому +3

      Lol

    • @dedsec7543
      @dedsec7543 Рік тому

      Great, i agree with you brother. I hope you will aslo accept the the truth that Buddha was an atheist. I don't think that i have to tell you the meaning or defination of atheist.
      Correct me if i am wrong

  • @rasowye1139
    @rasowye1139 Рік тому

    Not controlling mind but witnessing mind. By controlling mind becomes stronger more and by witnessing mind ceases. 🙏🏼

  • @rockyrawat9013
    @rockyrawat9013 2 роки тому +6

    Buddha enlightenment is above all spiritual practices 🙏 followed by other religious organisations

  • @bheemkabir5736
    @bheemkabir5736 2 роки тому +4

    Calling Buddha incarceration of Vishnu is a propaganda. If this was so all Buddhist dominant countries would believe him to be Vishnu.

  • @bhuvikamble8332
    @bhuvikamble8332 5 місяців тому +1

    When you know deeply Buddha than you know Buddha own said i am not any awtar and not special person in the world 🌍 he is such a peaceful person namo Buddhay 😊

  • @WhistleMaster
    @WhistleMaster 2 роки тому +11

    Buddha himself in Dasharatha Jataka says he is an incarnation of Rama. So where is the confusion?

    • @WhistleMaster
      @WhistleMaster 2 роки тому +2

      @@linguistme6870 Well said. There was a competition of narratives for ages in India. But if you notice the enlightened rishis stuck to the higher plane and spoke about stuff like the nature of the divine, purpose of life, Karma, Moksha, Nirvana etc, while the petty followers fought about who was a disciple of whom!

    • @nowwhat6716
      @nowwhat6716 2 роки тому +1

      The problem is dashratha jataka is older story then Ramayana 😂. First jataka tales mention ram and sita as brother and sister.later Jain follower added ravana into the story and then some brahmin create Ramayana story.

    • @WhistleMaster
      @WhistleMaster 2 роки тому +1

      @@nowwhat6716 so the story about Rama is older than Rama himself! It is too much to expect logic in public forums now a days!

    • @Nanded12345
      @Nanded12345 2 роки тому +1

      @@nowwhat6716 Dashratha jataka is based on ramayan by valkmiki .

    • @adityaXvibe
      @adityaXvibe Рік тому

      truee

  • @sagarchoudhary8547
    @sagarchoudhary8547 Рік тому +4

    We need more on Buddhism!!!

  • @swiftA0
    @swiftA0 Місяць тому +2

    Gautam Buddha was an enlightened being, he was freed from the cycle of birth and death (samsara). If he is freed from birth and death then why would he take any Avatar or Reincarnation?

  • @Jonathan090
    @Jonathan090 Рік тому +5

    There are no mentions of Hinduism in any scripture of lord Bhuddha's but there are mentions of lord Bhuddha in Hindu books. Hence Bhuddism is oldest religion in the world.

    • @staywaybicthws________
      @staywaybicthws________ Рік тому +2

      If you are saying so than you probably haven't read the Hindu scriptures well ..

    • @nakulgoyal3630
      @nakulgoyal3630 Рік тому +3

      What a joke😂😂
      Even Jainism is very very older than Buddhism. Even,Gautam Budh took birth in a Hindu Kshatriya family. Hence,there was no buddhism before Buddha got enlightenment

    • @ChandelAditya27
      @ChandelAditya27 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@nakulgoyal3630he think he is albert Einstein 😂

    • @nakulgoyal3630
      @nakulgoyal3630 2 місяці тому +2

      @@ChandelAditya27 yess😂 they are Neo Buddhists, a completely different sect created by Ambedkar. They don't know a shit about Buddhism and lord Buddha. Real Buddhists never abuse,talk ill of Hinduism. They are simple, noble people busy in their worship and meditation.

    • @ChandelAditya27
      @ChandelAditya27 2 місяці тому +1

      @@nakulgoyal3630 yes I visited sri Lanka aisa kuch nhi tha wahan par dekho thoda bhot toh chlta h bhai par extreme nhi tha

  • @peacockLife
    @peacockLife Рік тому +3

    i agree with you Sir, we can be sanatan and a saint even in married life.. life of purity, sattvic..

  • @Banafar_Rajput8047
    @Banafar_Rajput8047 Рік тому +2

    Buddhism is not a religion it's philosophy...just philosophy

  • @kushagraacharya4629
    @kushagraacharya4629 Рік тому +6

    Yeah....the ultimate goal was the same for both.....Eternal truth ❤️❤️🚩🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @संजयगोस्वामी-ग6ह

    Confusion comes because of ancient prediction as per Puran texts that Vishnu incarnation Buddha will be born in Gaya india. Also the name of his mother
    While prince Siddharth was born in Nepal he did achieve Buddha status in Gaya.
    As per Puri Shankaracharya the avatar Buddha was different person who lived several centuries prior to Siddharth

    • @cartoonmemes6584
      @cartoonmemes6584 2 роки тому +4

      In Nepal They Born Name Was :- Siddharth
      Then in Gya They Get Title Buddha It means Buddha Born In Gya.. That Anciant predictors whare are wrong..

    • @harshbisht6557
      @harshbisht6557 2 роки тому +12

      @norsang lama u show me.ur brain. ,,
      I 'll show u shree hari Vishnu🤞

    • @rahulrawat8164
      @rahulrawat8164 2 роки тому

      @@harshbisht6557 in puran vishnu means satvik guna.... Shree ram sree krishn n Lord buddha has satvik Or vishnu gun.... In scince electron proton newton... In puran brahma vishnu mahesh and in bhagwat geeta... Satv tamas rajas

    • @prophet0019
      @prophet0019 2 роки тому +1

      @norsang lama first prove Buddha existed.. There is no proofs of Buddha.. Buddha was just an alter ego of ashoka..

    • @sen5541
      @sen5541 2 роки тому +3

      @@prophet0019 lol there are tons of proof first his birth place and time ( in year BCE ) and most importantly his death ( that's shows he is human not God) travelers wrote books on him and kings who adopted Buddhism r proven to exist also check Wikipedia first with scientists proven his birth , now tell me one thing vishnu was powerful God how did he died? Where are all thousands of gods gone with no birth date no death not even scientists could prove check Wikipedia yourself

  • @Koyal_tupsamundre
    @Koyal_tupsamundre 2 місяці тому +1

    Buddha's teachings were grounded in humanity, not divinity. Yet, his calm and global influence led some to consider him a Vishnu avatar, highlighting the power of his message.

  • @shubhamwatve
    @shubhamwatve 2 роки тому +11

    Namo buddhai....

  • @himanshumaheriya5339
    @himanshumaheriya5339 2 роки тому +4

    Every incarnation is Vishnu or shiva it just the way they choose the called Vishnu or shiva..those who distroy they called shiva and those who maintained the called Vishnu
    In simple word all incarnation is Krishna
    It’s just they all served in different way

  • @aishwaryadeshmukh3471
    @aishwaryadeshmukh3471 Місяць тому +1

    Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.
    Buddha Siddhartha Guatama

  • @mrtsed1585
    @mrtsed1585 Рік тому +3

    Many enlightened buddhist masters were not ascetics instead some were luxuriously living merchants like vimalikirti. He should call one of buddhist scholars to podcast

  • @prateekpatil1674
    @prateekpatil1674 2 роки тому +8

    Wow very deep knowledge about our religion I think I get my all knowledge of hinduism from Beer biceps

  • @jaymondal2466
    @jaymondal2466 3 місяці тому +2

    Buddhism doesn’t clash with Hinduism?!?!! That’s a new one.. There is a huge difference .. Buddhism preaches shunyata - no soul.. Hinduism obviously believes in the soul

    • @jithuyadav8869
      @jithuyadav8869 Місяць тому

      Buddhism definetely clash with hinduism. The only difference is the brahman whom hindus consider is the same shunyata buddhists consider

  • @kamesh5846
    @kamesh5846 2 роки тому +3

    There is a jataka tale,Dasaratha Jataka... Narrated by Buddha... In which there is a story of Ram where he goes to Exile with his siblings lakshman and sita. Read from a proper pdf not wikipedia. There is no telling of he went to lanka or sita is his wife.
    So if we go by the narration that Buddha is an incarnation of vishnu then what he says in the story should be accepted as fact and the entire Ramayana loses its significance. If not then, buddha is nothing to do with vishnu and he never believed on the concept of a creator creating an universe. The Buddha tells a lot of stories of different Devas in different realms. Brahma also being such one god with an expiry date on him.
    Also if you go by scriptures, there are not 10 avatars, some tell there are 12 avatars or 13 or 25. The 10 avatars being the major one.
    The problem between Buddhism and Vedic religion started with the time Buddha giving sermons and Kings taking buddhism as an alternative for vedic religion. Vedic religion was filled with rituals and the brahmins held higher post in it and they were the beneficiaries of this rituals. These were the times Beef was the primary delicacy of tye brahmins and you can find sacrifices of cow and descriptions of Veal meat given in detail. So once Buddhism took hold of the masses and it preached vegetarianism, the Brahmins rebranded vedic religion. Plagiarized buddhist teachings into Upanishads. The Nirvana No Self of Buddha became Brahman in upanishads( not shudran or kshatrian 😉). Thats the very reason they started owning Buddha as vishnu's avatar.
    They have hijacked a lot of native gods into vedic religion this way.
    The social history of india is the conflict Vedic religion had with Buddhism. If Buddhism was not seen as a threat you won't be stories of shankaracharya debating with buddhists and asking them to give of buddhism or jump into fire or just get exiled.
    Dude Ranveer you've got a lot of reading to do. Hopefully you reach a road block on your path and get to buddhism to understand. The more you read and practise buddhism you will understand the history of India with more clarity. The religious wars are more bloodier and tye winners have edited holy books, which are powerful than history books of kings.

  • @santoshingle3989
    @santoshingle3989 Рік тому +4

    Buddha himself called as a common man in almost all buddhist literature, not Avtar, so debate must be actually over here itself.

  • @avhale
    @avhale 3 місяці тому +1

    As far as i understand, Buddha is a title like Maharaj etc, Basically Buddha is form of meditative form of vishnu in kalyuga.. i guess there r more than 2-3 buddhas that happened in past.. its nothing diff but integral part of Santan dharma, with extension of higher possibility of human consciousness as now a days being preached by satguru🙏

  • @frankfernandes718
    @frankfernandes718 2 роки тому +12

    Buddha and Jesus : leave the world and become free from attachment
    Krishna: stay in this world does and still don't get attach to material world

    • @jagatthakur7245
      @jagatthakur7245 2 роки тому

      Have u heard about the gabriel stone inscription which tells the story of a king the simon of pirrea who has same faith on him that he is the messiah his death was before jesus around 37 years before the birth of jesus and later on this story get by jesus n says that he is the messiah actually he is not the messiah

    • @Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108
      @Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 2 роки тому

      Hey, keep Jesus away. he has nothing to do with Sanatana dharma (Hinduims, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism). dont bring Jesus stop the abrahmisation. it will not work. you can convert few but they will unconvert back because the concept of conversion is fraud. Jesus is myth. corrupt form of Zeus or Indra. Abrahmic religions are primitve non spiritual blind belief systems. don't corrupt and create confusion.

    • @allproducts6933
      @allproducts6933 2 роки тому

      If all good guy became saint leave the society then all bad guy will come capture it and run society . So krishna says not everybody should do and like go to jungle meditation and all that .and what is purpose of any prophet or Jesus or budhha to born on earth just take society on good path

    • @frankfernandes718
      @frankfernandes718 2 роки тому

      @@allproducts6933 it is the people or kings who take it just that they take inspiration from gods nothing else otherwise there is no God

    • @kushaq1173
      @kushaq1173 2 роки тому

      @@frankfernandes718 good for u.

  • @Usr_11ijk
    @Usr_11ijk 10 місяців тому +4

    Buddha belongs to Rama's family tree

    • @AkashKumar-wd4uq
      @AkashKumar-wd4uq Місяць тому

      Ram is the character in jataka stories. There he is Avloketheswar Buddha and Buddha did not belong to Ram family

  • @MandoLarian007
    @MandoLarian007 Місяць тому

    World 🌎 has never seen nor will ever see a debater, philosopher and a guru like Shakyamuni Buddha ❤❤❤

  • @ta_shi__nam_gyal
    @ta_shi__nam_gyal 2 роки тому +10

    I strongly believe that all Gods /Allah /bhagwan /enlightenment person/ Gurus / inspired us to do good deed in life and if possible do good for others, otherwise just don't harm .
    I genuinely respect all religions and never get hesitate to pray infront of any Gods /Statues/temples etc.
    "Last but not least Humanity is all above them" . ♥️
    🇮🇳Buddhist

    • @sagarsrivastava1629
      @sagarsrivastava1629 2 роки тому +1

      yup....the neo sanatani buddhist muslims and other......should teach the good from there scriptures rather than spreading hatred and proving there belief to be supreme from other....and lasty
      what you have or is today
      was someone past and will be someones future

    • @prakxyz
      @prakxyz Рік тому +2

      Try your theory in afghanistan

    • @TheGuiltsOfUs
      @TheGuiltsOfUs Рік тому

      I suppose

    • @obito-uchiha_
      @obito-uchiha_ Рік тому

      As u can see they r claiming budhism is branch of Hinduism which is 100% fake, they r promoting lies, it's very shameful.

  • @ramkrisnagoliya3240
    @ramkrisnagoliya3240 Рік тому +5

    The budhha are change my life he is first time teaching on Zee tv this episode is inspired lot and change my bad things into after my many good things and feeling that was amazing moments which is I'm knowledge grow in my brain according to budhha teaching this is very important part of my life unbelievable 💗💗💗💗💗

  • @Hukumrocks
    @Hukumrocks 4 місяці тому +1

    How can anyone say that his father was Hindu? His name was Siddharth. How can he not be a Sanatani? He is from Sanatan Dharma and was a part of Vishnu.

  • @aniruddhapawar1230
    @aniruddhapawar1230 Рік тому +3

    रणवीर भाई I'm Buddhists मे और हमारे culture मे नही मानते बुद्धा विष्णु के अवतार थे

  • @pawanbhattarai4685
    @pawanbhattarai4685 2 роки тому +7

    We are devotee of buddhism..and siddhartha gautam was enlightened human.....not the incarnation..he himself said believe with eye open .......there would be nothing in corrupt faith .

  • @jayajmeria5250
    @jayajmeria5250 6 місяців тому +1

    This is what we Hindu believe Buddha is the last incarnation of Vishnu and the next incarnation will be kalki

  • @chaitanyachaudhari63
    @chaitanyachaudhari63 Рік тому +3

    Hinduism Jainism Buddhism & Sikhism all are the parts of SANATANA DHARMA 🚩

    • @vedantmane1824
      @vedantmane1824 Рік тому

      Don't count buddha in yourself

    • @rimurutempest2130
      @rimurutempest2130 Рік тому

      @@vedantmane1824 He Means they are born in larger Indic Religions

    • @vedantmane1824
      @vedantmane1824 Рік тому

      @@rimurutempest2130 buddhism is a largest dharm in asia and most of Buddhist thoughts has been copied in Hinduism so we can say Hinduism is a part of Buddhism 🤝

    • @rimurutempest2130
      @rimurutempest2130 Рік тому +1

      @@vedantmane1824 lol which class are you studying kid . Even Buddhists Don't claim That Buddhism came before Hinduism . Buddha born in 563 BCE . Hindu temples like Thiruvalla temple itself was built around 3000 BCE . According to scientists , Hinduism is atleast 4000-6000 BCE old . Scientists laughing at you kid 😂

    • @vedantmane1824
      @vedantmane1824 Рік тому

      @@rimurutempest2130 my dear rimuru buddhism was born 2500 before buddha, and about me? Then iam a virologist working in Wuhan China and also i have completed my studies in bachelor in spiritual science from hangzhou have a good day

  • @anandgowda8539
    @anandgowda8539 2 роки тому +3

    Buddhism is a clinical performance by Siddhartha Gautama of one aspect of Hinduism

    • @sidhantkamble5191
      @sidhantkamble5191 Рік тому

      🤣🤣 hindu word thaa kya uss time

    • @infohub4838
      @infohub4838 Рік тому

      @@sidhantkamble5191 but sanatan Dharma to tha na aur us samay sab kuch Sanskrit me hi sanvad hota tha

    • @sidhantkamble5191
      @sidhantkamble5191 Рік тому

      @@infohub4838 😂😂 yar Sanatan word 2015 ke pehle kisee ke Zuban pai nahi thaa, pagalo ke jesaa hindu hindu karte thee tum log. You know what ye SANATAN word tabhi aaya jub supreme court ne bola ki HINDUNISM IS NOT A RELIGION ITS A WAY OF LIFE. 😂

    • @staywaybicthws________
      @staywaybicthws________ Рік тому

      ​​​​@@sidhantkamble5191Hinduism in the oldest religion in the world so how is it possible kisi ke "zuban" pe nahi tha .. The vedas are the oldest scriptures in the world, they were written even before other communities came into existence....And yes it's indeed a way of living.. Read the bhagvad gita, it gives you answers to all your problems..Even the west appreciates the Beauty of this holy text.. Plus budha was himself born in a Hindu family so we all know how old the religion actually is ..and we have no hatred towards other religions because that's what we have been taught.. i respect all religions❤

  • @yudhistirs
    @yudhistirs 2 роки тому +2

    When you control your mind. You will win 1000 battles automatically. Because, then, you won't go for the battles, it will be pointless to you.

  • @utkarshchannel8
    @utkarshchannel8 2 роки тому +11

    Anyone who attains enlightenment through the middle path i. e through gyan Maarg
    is called buddha
    There are levels in
    Sottapanna, sakadagami Anagami, arahat and the last is buddha
    Arahat and buddha is 99% equal status
    Whosoever attains buddhtva can be called buddha
    Gautama become famous simply because he was a kings son
    A Rajkumar

    • @agniswar3
      @agniswar3 2 роки тому +2

      There are numerous Buddhas. And your point of view is not a correct one. It is true that Sakyamuni was a prince but is that actually matter? Being born in a royal house has nothing to do with being popular. Many Great sages of all time were born into very humble houses. Just take a look -
      1. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, the most important Vaishnava saint was born in a humble brahmin family.
      2. Sant Kabir, the great bhakti saint was a weaver.

    • @HinduPhoenix
      @HinduPhoenix 2 роки тому

      What Enlightenment when you don't even believe in Atma🤣

    • @karankamble558
      @karankamble558 2 роки тому +2

      Because They Never practice true dharma To understand they kept wandering o. Debates of Hindu -buddhism- Muslim And communities sampraday bhed bhaav Dharm Samje hi nahi Kabhi...

    • @karankamble558
      @karankamble558 2 роки тому

      Why buddha are born as king or rich specifically its due to their accomplishing 10 paramis

    • @karankamble558
      @karankamble558 2 роки тому

      @@HinduPhoenix Tum sampraday lep se judde huye ho Isliye samj nahi ayga apko...

  • @aryanyadav3690
    @aryanyadav3690 2 роки тому +12

    "Buddha" is a title given & not a name of anyone
    Yes there are/were many Buddhas in INDIA🧘‍♂️

  • @LK56835
    @LK56835 Рік тому +1

    Buddha is an incarnation of Vishnu, in an absolute human form, without any powers. This is a much-needed avatar of Vishnu.
    It's very clear now that he is an incarnation of Vishnu because of his influence in the world.
    Whenever Vishnu comes, he comes for a reason, and his influence is massive and all-entrenching.
    The need for Buddha was in bringing about practicality without the idea of God... because people (via religions) use the idea of "God" to control people's beliefs and way of life! Buddha was for freedom (which in Buddhism they call Nirvana, and in Hinduism they call Moksha)

  • @srinivasiyer9512
    @srinivasiyer9512 2 роки тому +13

    Buddha is not incarnation of lord Vishnu he is a enlightenment man.he got the Shiksha from Indian yogis who lived in Himalaya.

  • @tyroelohim4462
    @tyroelohim4462 2 роки тому +9

    warning: There are many avatars, but only these we know from childhood. But after matsya avatar there's horse avatar of vishnu. which is called hayagreeva avatar.

    • @hadibhaiya576
      @hadibhaiya576 2 роки тому +2

      24 avatar of Garbhodakshayi vishnu is correct sequence of Visnu's avatar list, for more knowledge refer to shrimad bhagvatam.
      Radhe Radhe!

    • @tyroelohim4462
      @tyroelohim4462 2 роки тому +1

      @@hadibhaiya576 how many types of vishnu are there? nope, there are more avatars of vishnu if you can count from start.

    • @hadibhaiya576
      @hadibhaiya576 2 роки тому +1

      @@tyroelohim4462 There are 3 types of Vishnu which are from Sankarshan

    • @tyroelohim4462
      @tyroelohim4462 2 роки тому

      @@hadibhaiya576 what's sankarshan?

    • @hadibhaiya576
      @hadibhaiya576 2 роки тому +1

      @@tyroelohim4462 See sankarshan eminated from Balram. Balram emanated from
      Golok bihari SHRI krishna

  • @milind0808
    @milind0808 Рік тому +1

    If Buddha is the 9 th avatar his teaching would have not spread out of India.
    Buddhism is true religion of humanity...

  • @nsharma6322
    @nsharma6322 2 роки тому +3

    brilliant discussion !! very enlightening !

  • @massiah1298
    @massiah1298 2 роки тому +5

    Most of the scriptures of buddhism , hinduism, jainism were lost and burnt during nalanda invasion... So we can't debate on these topics anymore..
    We don't have evidence.. And i think we have to keep and stay in that way..
    Other than this What adi sankaracharya did was for betterment of the people..its not that he defeated buddhism and it's teachings...Because followers of buddhism started taking shortcuts to reach goal which were not dharmic..they say as vajrayana school(mainly tantra was used) .. Adi sankaracharya had to do that..
    Buddhist scriptures were written 100 years after the death of buddha which may not be the exact word said by the buddha..
    Plus what he said that buddhism is not for family man is totally wrong..
    There are shilas buddha gave - panchshilas, ashtashila and dasshilas..
    for different sects of people in the society to move in the right direction...

    • @Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108
      @Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 2 роки тому

      Why do christians like you always create corruption and downgrade dharmic cultures. stop the abrahmisation propaganda.
      nalanda etc were burned and destroyed but it was not even 2% of the knowledge. schools, libraries were present in every village and there were copies of all those scriptures in every homes. so more then 95% scriptures survived. and the original form of all those scriptures were saved and are being practice. abrahmic religons keep your nose out of spirituality. you primitve barberiens blind belief systems.

    • @massiah1298
      @massiah1298 2 роки тому +1

      @@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 you are totally wrong in this case that 95% of it survived .. Instead you should say 5% survived..
      Thanks..

    • @Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108
      @Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108 2 роки тому

      @@massiah1298 the main scriptures survived that's enough. what about bible it is just collection of pagan scriptures. there is no Christianity it fruad. world domination plan using faith.

  • @The_Ambedkarites
    @The_Ambedkarites Рік тому +1

    buddha wasn't avatar of any imaginary gods he is enlightenment and lamp of asia 🙌💙
    Jay Bhim 💙
    Namo Buddhay 🤍
    Peace ☮️

    • @sahilop1175
      @sahilop1175 Рік тому +2

      Kisi aur ke religious sentiments "imaginary god's" bolke hurt karna aur fir uparse peace bolna ....irony

    • @ChandelAditya27
      @ChandelAditya27 2 місяці тому

      And yeh real one kahan he 😂​@@sahilop1175 agr bhuddq bhi yeh sb dekhte toh haste zarur

  • @dpk228
    @dpk228 2 роки тому +4

    Firstly the man i.e Buddha himself didn't believe in any God incarnation. Cause it's basically one of the ancient "nastik darshana philosophy" i.e. atheist philosophy of india. So no debate over it. Secondly i totally disagree with the guest that Advaita philosophy won over any philosophy. Cause the proponent of the philosophy i.e. "Shankaracharya" is called " प्रच्छन्न बुद्धा" means "disguise Buddha" cause his philosophy was very very similar to the famous Buddhist scholar "Nagarjuna". And also not everyone in Buddha's period was leaving homes to become sanyasis and attain enlightenment. Cause Buddha himself gave many rules like "four noble truths and eight fold path" and many to follow for a common man. So that he can attain enlightenment too. And there are many examples of that in Buddhist literature.

    • @jayantkamble6082
      @jayantkamble6082 2 роки тому

      Buddhism is nothing to do atheistic doctrine at all. Buddhism do believe in Deva incarnation as there is example Arhant monk Nagsena believed to be buddhist God Mahasena. Yes, it is true Buddha was not incarnation of Hindu Vishnu. Buddhism believe in all beings can dwell in all realms of existence.

  • @masterjack96
    @masterjack96 Рік тому +2

    It's not about what Hindus think about Buddha. It's all about Buddha thoughts and teaching that matters. He never claimed to be God or Son of god or something like that.

    • @10milionsviews
      @10milionsviews 9 місяців тому

      Buddha is not the person of showy or tell you that I'm God and all supreme..it's harmful for one life ...called ahangkar

  • @Roxchatzdabest
    @Roxchatzdabest 2 роки тому +4

    This person is having more assumptions than knowledge of Buddhism.

    • @su-mu
      @su-mu Рік тому

      Right. Both guest and host are either completely ignorant or just outright liars.

  • @saurabhraul1578
    @saurabhraul1578 2 роки тому +16

    For me Brahma means people who attainted through intellect ,Vishnu means people who got attained mainly through heart and Shiva means people who attainted by sheer physical nature .As Buddha's teachings are mainly based on compassion he is called incarnation of VISHNU By Hindus . Krishna is also same the same as he embodies love and compassion. J krishnamurti can be compared with Brahma .Osho with Vishnu. Sadhguru and Raman Maharishi from the sHiva path

  • @ansh_u_r
    @ansh_u_r 2 роки тому +1

    People who wants to divide only they see differences but people with clear heart and right brain can se union.

    • @artisticthings7843
      @artisticthings7843 Рік тому

      We do not see difference we see facts.
      Buddha was a human being not God

  • @zachscombat
    @zachscombat 2 роки тому +8

    Buddha didn't find the peace and the root cause of suffering in Hinduism. That's why he has choosen different path.

    • @Aaryavartah
      @Aaryavartah 2 роки тому +21

      This is factually incorrect. There are 112 paths which lead to the supreme union between human and parambrahma (the ultimate supreme energy/consciousness) in Sanatan dharma. Sri Gautama Buddha rediscovered a path of this union that was not so followed in those times.
      So quite literally Sri Gautama worked and established himself in the Sanatan Dharma sphere only...He never said Budhhism was a new religion, nor did he ever say that buddhism was not a part of hinduism/sanatan dharma.
      There are other branches of hinduism/sanatan dharma, namely jainism, sikkhism, buddhism, vedanta, vaishnav, shaiv,smriti, astika, nastika etc.
      In todays era, in search of self identity in this world, many people want to divide every part of hinduism into a new religion...but when there establishers didn't exclude these methods from hinduism, why do you ?
      Namaskaram🙏

    • @spider-maninside5401
      @spider-maninside5401 2 роки тому +1

      @@Aaryavartah He literally went to the top hindu saints to learn the find of peace but couldn't. what number you are talking about, he might already had learnt it

    • @ab2001k
      @ab2001k 2 роки тому +1

      @@spider-maninside5401 It's possible when you're connected yourself with absolute; but There is two things Gyan and bodh, gyan is knowledge but bodh is experience.

    • @Aaryavartah
      @Aaryavartah 2 роки тому +6

      @@spider-maninside5401 ​ @Spider-man Inside Lets not dwelve into what he might have done, instead talk about what has been documented during his life time. Also, in sanatan tradition, you don't find peace merely by visiting a saint, you have to work for it...which involves years of practice of vrat, saadhana, upvaas, aatma nirikschana, atma-pratibandh, bhutashuddhi etc. These are literally the things that he practiced for the rest of his life.
      He himself mentioned that he is not the only Buddh to be born on this earth, There were many buddh who walked the earth before him, and many will walk the earth after him, so lets not disconnect Sri Gautam Buddh from the great past lineage he hails from, that he himself practiced and followed throughout his life.
      Namaskaram🙏

    • @soyasauce7505
      @soyasauce7505 2 роки тому +5

      @@spider-maninside5401 ultimately he did dhyaan yog only dude. Dhyan yog is an integral part of Hinduism recited in Bhagavad Gita and attaining moksha is the ultimate goal.
      No matter what path you follow you ultimately have to return back to Sanatan Dharma 🕉️.

  • @gyomeihimejima2829
    @gyomeihimejima2829 10 місяців тому +4

    In Hinduism, it was prophecised that the 'last' Avatar of Lord Vishnu will be born in Kali Yuga. Lord Buddha was born in Kali Yuga so hence, he cannot be the Avatar of Lord Vishnu.
    Buddhism is an atheistic religion of peace, so let's keep it that way ✌🏻☸️

    • @Jigme2geeked_666
      @Jigme2geeked_666 10 місяців тому

      Finally an hindu with common sense ❤❤❤❤

    • @gyomeihimejima2829
      @gyomeihimejima2829 10 місяців тому

      @@Jigme2geeked_666 I am an atheist dude ⚛️

    • @Jigme2geeked_666
      @Jigme2geeked_666 10 місяців тому +1

      @@gyomeihimejima2829 still respect you

    • @gyomeihimejima2829
      @gyomeihimejima2829 10 місяців тому +1

      @@Jigme2geeked_666 Thank you 🙏🏻💙

    • @adityaunde4134
      @adityaunde4134 9 місяців тому +1

      1. Every teaching of Buddhism is already present in Hinduism. Just like you can find similarities in Abrahamic religions.
      Even Dalai Lama said Hinduism and Buddhism are like brothers having same values.
      2. Buddhism also has Gods so get your facts right about calling it a completely atheistic religion.