I was subscribed to this channel on an old account that I totally forgot I had and today I redescovered it. I remembered the "what is the largest number?" clip, it has been 10 years. Glad you are still making videos and I have a lot to catch up. What a blast from the past.
Woah, I haven't watched this channel for around 7 years and I come back to a collaboration with Geraint Lewis, and I was a big fan of Alas Lewis and Barnes 3 years ago - like a double dose of nostalgia :D
If shift to red can be explained by a local time flow speeding up through eons (what was 1Hz in early universe now we observe as less) do we still need a Big Bang and the universe expanding in this theory? In a static universe (regarding space) where time flow speeds up you would see a red shif as well as the further the observerd source of light lays, the more time past since it emmited the signal and your sensor works relatively faster in comparison to the signal source - interpreting the signal as red shifted. Why Big Bang then?
Since there is no "higher order time" that our time is running on top of, the rate at which time runs can only be measured relative to another observer. The early universe is not simultaneous with our frame of reference, so I don't see how it's meaningful to say that time moved at a different rate back then. It's like if someone said that time froze for a million years on December 23 and then kept running as normal and we didn't notice... in what meaningful way could you say that happened?
Would a human feel if times was gping slower? I don't mean if we can detect the change somehow, but would we be conciously be able to tell that time goes slower?
What is the youtube channel Geraint Lewis has with another physicist where they talk face to face about one or two topics? I was seeing it a few years back.
@@fep_ptcp883 Okay so. Are you saying that he DID say novi now, but that's because he's from Bahrain, or are you saying that in Bahrain they say novi? So when you proposed that he said novae previously that was a mistake? lmao. His accent is not causing him to say "vi" when he should say "vae"
@@NaR00W he said novae (no like "none", vae like "viable"). He is not a native speaker. In other languges such as his mother tongue, "novae" sounds like "novi" spoken by an american english speaker. The transcript is calibrated to EN-US, hence the confusion. Please refrain from being so annoying by pretending to be intelligent.
We don't even know how the first stars formed. Right now the existing theory has a nasty entropy problem. Hydrogen doesn't clump. No matter how much of the stuff is in free space.
Wait, how did I not realize you were uploading again!?
same her, i am a subscriber but still missed the first video
"Can you say cosmological time dilation?" Precious😂
I'm glad I stayed to the very end.
Wow, i did not see you in years! It's great to see your fascinating videos again.
Great to see you back, we missed you.
Nice to see you back, doing content again :) Interesting topics these last few videos.
Damn it has been years since last upload. Welcome back Sharkee.
I was subscribed to this channel on an old account that I totally forgot I had and today I redescovered it. I remembered the "what is the largest number?" clip, it has been 10 years. Glad you are still making videos and I have a lot to catch up. What a blast from the past.
very interesting idea that I never thought off, so in principle we live in a outward inverted black hole
One of my favorite channels ever, glad u back man
This BIIIG MICROPHONE is hiding you!
Get back, too close!!
GOOD CONTENT!! 😃😄😁🤩
Woah, I haven't watched this channel for around 7 years and I come back to a collaboration with Geraint Lewis, and I was a big fan of Alas Lewis and Barnes 3 years ago - like a double dose of nostalgia :D
If shift to red can be explained by a local time flow speeding up through eons (what was 1Hz in early universe now we observe as less) do we still need a Big Bang and the universe expanding in this theory? In a static universe (regarding space) where time flow speeds up you would see a red shif as well as the further the observerd source of light lays, the more time past since it emmited the signal and your sensor works relatively faster in comparison to the signal source - interpreting the signal as red shifted. Why Big Bang then?
Since there is no "higher order time" that our time is running on top of, the rate at which time runs can only be measured relative to another observer. The early universe is not simultaneous with our frame of reference, so I don't see how it's meaningful to say that time moved at a different rate back then.
It's like if someone said that time froze for a million years on December 23 and then kept running as normal and we didn't notice... in what meaningful way could you say that happened?
Would that mean that cosmic inflation didn't actually break speed of light, because the time was going slower?
Do gravitational clocks ( pendulums, orbits ) and atomic clocks measure the same thing?
Would a human feel if times was gping slower? I don't mean if we can detect the change somehow, but would we be conciously be able to tell that time goes slower?
Holy Shit! I just realized you're back.
Good times!
What is the youtube channel Geraint Lewis has with another physicist where they talk face to face about one or two topics? I was seeing it a few years back.
I love to see that Sharkee is back, but I do miss the your mama jokes.
watching this video in 0.25 speed ;)
Can you cover the Fermi paradox?
Nice surprise at the end 😁 Bless you guys.
Oh what an Irony for those Supernovae stars
Awesome he's back!
YOURE BACK WOOOOOOO
Welcome back!
Cute kid
My man!
The plural of "nova" is not "novi"
He used the plural "novae" from latin
@@fep_ptcp883 Literally not. He said "novi" 500 times. 4:17. If you don't trust your ears check the transcript.
@@NaR00W he's from Bahrain
@@fep_ptcp883 Okay so. Are you saying that he DID say novi now, but that's because he's from Bahrain, or are you saying that in Bahrain they say novi? So when you proposed that he said novae previously that was a mistake? lmao.
His accent is not causing him to say "vi" when he should say "vae"
@@NaR00W he said novae (no like "none", vae like "viable"). He is not a native speaker. In other languges such as his mother tongue, "novae" sounds like "novi" spoken by an american english speaker. The transcript is calibrated to EN-US, hence the confusion.
Please refrain from being so annoying by pretending to be intelligent.
We don't even know how the first stars formed. Right now the existing theory has a nasty entropy problem. Hydrogen doesn't clump. No matter how much of the stuff is in free space.