Logical Reasoning | SYLLOGISM Tricks

Follow our Facebook Page: / nomostud A SYLLOGISM is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.
#logicalreasoning #syllogism #logical #nomostudio

[@karcee9024]

Finally, I've found someone explain this reasoning like a crystal clear for me, i understand your explanatios more than someone explaining in my own language. TY Sir

[@silentgilzone]

Grabe very simple, precise and super daling maintindihan ng mga explanations 🎉❤❤❤ More power

[@jazlovedad]

Finally! Someone who explains it well to me! in 1 month, I have my 11+ test, and I'm learning this in tuition ans i needed help on this! THANK YOU SIR!!🤩🥰😊💗💓💖

[@charminediancin3772]

Maraming Salamat napakalaking tulong ng mga videos mo po ako po ay naka pasa last August 20, 2023 examination ❤ kanina po yung result ☺
Good luck sa mga mag e-exam follow nyo lang po itong channel marami kayong matututunan.

[@TinoXO]

This has explained syllogisms in a way I can fully understand! thank you so much.

[@genalynvista9447]

thanks Boss ang galing .walang akong idea about sa ganito.dahil sa simple explanation u naka gets ko agad more power sa youtube channel u boss.

[@echocantos5398]

Thank you!! I am now confident that i can passed the Analytical Ability in CSE

[@jezylantenero735]

Sobrang helpful ito talaga rason bat ako nakapasa sa csc gnamit ko lahat ng natutunan ko thank you thank you so so mucj

[@joemaragbuya6828]

Nice explanation

[@jumarieterencio7036]

Ang galing mo sir.. Natuto ako agad.. Naitama ko Q:2&3. Hehe.. Salamat ng marami po. 😅🙏

[@user-xb7ld2sv1g]

Wonderful and simple explanation, thanks a lot

[@fermingarza6357]

Awesome teaching!

[@armiaragones1455]

Very informative. Thanks

[@joshreyes4990]

THANK YOU SO MUCH SA KLARONG EXPLANATION.

[@elnatalgezahagn3294]

Am from Ethiopia, Africa.and I don't have a word to thank.

[@jaydenlee1228]

For the 2nd question, shouldnt the jugs overlap with birds and parrot as well?

[@icant7073]

Good teacher! thumbs up!

[@irishdawnblanca1841]

I really have a hard time intindihin eto sa mga exam. Ngayun ko lng nakita itong video at na intidihan ko po yung explanation nyu. Thank you po.

[@user-qv6fx5hi1d]

Thanks for this, really helpful

[@davidforshaw4998]

👍 Thanks so much for this! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[@manishyadav-gr3dj]

I'm here after my end sem ARP LR exams , 5 questions of 1 marks came like this and i only watched ur video yesterday
Thankyou

[@xiin1880]

Thank you so much sir!

[@nawazahmad1373]

Fantastic sir ❤❤from jk

[@shridharkumar5955]

By far, an exceptional video on how to crack 'Syllogism'.. .great work Nomostud

[@nomostud]

Glad you liked it!

[@gpaulac5284]

Your channel really helped in my fast paced cram/ review for UPLAE, thank you!

[@nomostud]

Glad it was helpful!

[@SpiderMike72]

hey is syllogism applies only if we are looking for conclusion? how about assumptions?

[@jesonbenito8238]

Thank you and more practice exam on this

[@dianna0002]

Thanks po for the technique❤

[@evrisshop6895]

It's a huge help.

[@suba_1992]

Thank you very useful

[@ZohanSyahFatomi]

Amazing tutorial

[@emot9550]

Thank you.

[@LeonBingo7]

it's so helpful thanks sir

[@MihretuWoldebrehan]

Thank you!

[@hafsaliaqat2163]

Thank u So much❤

[@user-kx3xc6nu8n]

A big thank you

[@akositoh5938]

Thank you. I'm New follower.

[@nomostud]

Welcome!

[@user-sm7vu3mf7i]

Thank you

[@user-oy7cq7px9p]

thank you so much po very well explained ❤ pag nakapasa po ako this coming aug exam sagot ko na 5 people na magtatake ng exam next year ❤ 🙏

[@maefajardolee6888]

Wow sana isa ako sa makakafree. Sana pumasa po kayo

[@aubreyspastels]

this is really helpful. thank you so much i can finally understand it now!

[@nathay1581]

thank you so much

[@Potencyfunction]

That is allike Aristotel argumentation theory.

[@alingmaliitanniavlog3031]

Dito Lang aqo nakaintinde ng ganitong problem

[@geetauberoi8428]

👍🏻💛🙏🏻

[@haftomkahsay7076]

very helpfull

[@iashsina1128]

OmG THANKS SO MUCH THIS HELPED SO MUCH I SUBSCRIBE

[@itchimarubaby9174]

3/3 thank you so much

[@regar4s]

Good! unfortunately you didn't touch enough upon negative premises and conditionals. But maybe it's in a another of your vids, need to check

[@HandsomeGrim6969]

3/3 thank you

[@Mr.Itsaragrisil]

2/3 Tink u.

[@mekusmekus807]

I got all the answers

[@ladycaspian]

I understand that if they intersect then the conclusion is true. For example, Jugs are Cats. this is true cuz they intersect. But my question is: If both Parrots and Birds are part of Cats, how come the conclusion Jugs are Birds is not correct? Simply because they don't intersect? Please clarify this for me 😊

[@evrisshop6895]

Yes, they don't intersect. You must only focus by encircling Jugs because it just said some Jugs are part of cats, it means bird is not included. Hope it helps po.

[@Ester_Krupova]

Only ' *some* Jugs are Cats' necessarily follows. 'Jugs are Cats' only *could be* the case
I suppose you meant 'some Jugs are Birds'. And that's not necessarily false, but it doesn't necessarily follow, because the relation between Jugs and Birds or Parrots wasn't specified. It could be that 'some Parrots are Jugs' or even that 'all Birds are Jugs', but that wouldn't have to necessarily be the case
Basically.. you have to consider if the conclusions only *could be* the case or if they *necessarily follow*

[@meomeow2520]

@@Ester_Krupova what's the difference between could be the case and just follow

[@_Esty_]

Follows means that it'd be true no matter what. Like in all cases

[@The_Schizoid_Man]

It should be some jugs are birds, but not all

[@manojatchayaprabhu9659]

I had a doubt
Statement: Any light is bright. Many light are bulbs.
Pls explain this

[@enriquemandario7980]

Thanks for this sir 🫡

[@rustomlicuanan4428]

can you explain the explicit and implicit ?

[@nomostud]

this is not a statement and assumption, this is syllogism... Anyway, I'll upload statement and assumption-related problems soon. Stay cool.

[@rustomlicuanan4428]

@@nomostud thank you 👍

[@i8MyChocol8s]

I love u bro

[@aguidsantonia2041]

I got the ansher

[@roychess]

The diagrams are EULER DIAGRAMS --not VENN DIAGRAMS. Venn Diagrams came into existence AFTER Euler had a method. Euler uses circles inside other circles. Venn diagrams never have other circles inside another, but has three overlapping circles at all times. There is only one diagram with three terms no matter what figure with Venn diagrams. Euler digrams depend on the premises and you must draw a according to information given. Venn diagrams are always the same three overlapping circles and ONE WAY to draw them. One way of drawing the diagram makes it better.

[@nomostud]

Yes, I know their differences, but take note, All Venn diagrams are Euler diagrams, but not all Euler diagrams are Venn diagrams. Euler diagrams only have the intersection combinations that actually exist in the real world. While Venn diagrams represent every hypothetically possible logical relationship between categories.

[@The_Schizoid_Man]

I disagree with your diagram in the second set of statements. All conclusions do follow. Edit: nevermind

[@ChristianJadeLHiasa]

Same. for me Letter C. Only 1 and 2 is the better answer on statement 2

[@paulacaraballido5377]

Tama naman po e

[@paulacaraballido5377]

Tama naman po e, sobrang layo naman ng pwesto ng plates sa cats at sa bird

[@louiejeeomambac8846]

Question number 2. Some cats are parrot. Some birds are parrot parang uncertain

[@tittiwoy-man-tuwad-tuwad.]

Thank you now i understand 🙏

[@manideesari2456]

I don't really understand these type of problems in practical... Cause, if cats circle have birds and parrots.. Then if some of cats are jugs... Why some of birds and parrots can't be jugs??? 🤔

[@pitsyboy1295]

hindi ba all cats are parrots?

[@pitsyboy1295]

nlilito po ako sir

[@NoobGamer-hr1jq]

3/3

[@undistake8505]

Sir ask po , what if ang question Some jugs are birds. True or false?
Some jugs are parrots. True or false?
Thank youuuu Ma'am/Sir

[@nomostud]

Ano po ba yan, sa statement na part or conclusion?

[@undistake8505]

@@nomostud Sir/Ma'am What if meron sa Conclusion
V "Some Jugs are Birds"
VI "Some Jugs are Parrots"
Ano po yung sagot? Thank you po 🙏

[@nomostud]

@@undistake8505 both does not follow all the statements. Since jugs and birds does not intersect. And also jugs and parrots. Refer back to the figure.

[@undistake8505]

@@nomostud Thank you po Ma'am/Sir 🙏

[@chaysjourney2183]

Thank you po,big help po ito . God bless po

[@corsinomijares4416]

Clarify lng po sir All parrots are birds all birds are cats tama po ito pero mali pa yata yung some cats are parrots and some birds are parrots. Pwede pa cguro kung All po lahat yan. E po dapat answer nyan eh basi sa statement All po sya pasok sya sa circle lahat dapat All din ang vice versa nyan hindi sya pwede some sir. Clarify lng po

[@birhanuhaile.w1583]

10q

[@byaningning]

Thank you!

[@kringleo615]

Thank you

Thank you

[@AnshuSharma-hu1mb]

Thank you