Finally, I've found someone explain this reasoning like a crystal clear for me, i understand your explanatios more than someone explaining in my own language. TY Sir
Maraming Salamat napakalaking tulong ng mga videos mo po ako po ay naka pasa last August 20, 2023 examination ❤ kanina po yung result ☺ Good luck sa mga mag e-exam follow nyo lang po itong channel marami kayong matututunan.
Finally! Someone who explains it well to me! in 1 month, I have my 11+ test, and I'm learning this in tuition ans i needed help on this! THANK YOU SIR!!🤩🥰😊💗💓💖
Thank you for sharing. I remember last year I tried to apply to one of the companies in Manila I encountered this kind of exam but I ended up with "manghula" 😅😅😅 on that whole part of the exam because I didn't know how to answer it.
you gotta conclude and deduce from the diagram if they intersect(in case of some) or overlap (in case of all) then you can say the statement is in concord
It's the same for ig most of us but you gotta conclude and deduce from the diagram if they intersect(in case of some) or overlap (in case of all) then you can say the statement is in concord
I understand that if they intersect then the conclusion is true. For example, Jugs are Cats. this is true cuz they intersect. But my question is: If both Parrots and Birds are part of Cats, how come the conclusion Jugs are Birds is not correct? Simply because they don't intersect? Please clarify this for me 😊
Yes, they don't intersect. You must only focus by encircling Jugs because it just said some Jugs are part of cats, it means bird is not included. Hope it helps po.
Only ' *some* Jugs are Cats' necessarily follows. 'Jugs are Cats' only *could be* the case I suppose you meant 'some Jugs are Birds'. And that's not necessarily false, but it doesn't necessarily follow, because the relation between Jugs and Birds or Parrots wasn't specified. It could be that 'some Parrots are Jugs' or even that 'all Birds are Jugs', but that wouldn't have to necessarily be the case Basically.. you have to consider if the conclusions only *could be* the case or if they *necessarily follow*
Helpful, but problematic if one must work this out on the spot during a debate, especially without pen and paper. Not being math-gifted, its difficult to think these out on a momentary basis.
@nomostud I hope you didn't take my wording of "problematic" to relate in any way to your video or instruction. In fact, I found your instruction here to be extremely helpful, and your diagramming could not have been conveyed more clearly. Reading Aristotle's text, especially without marginalia, is very dense and overwhelming at times to keep on track. Thanks again for the upload!
Statement #2 Diba dapat po "All parrots are bird" kasi nakapasok lahat ng parrots sa Bird. Bat naging tama yung "Some birds are parrot"? Please reply sir Nomoo? Curios lang po ako Correct Answer is letter E: none of these
Clarify lng po sir All parrots are birds all birds are cats tama po ito pero mali pa yata yung some cats are parrots and some birds are parrots. Pwede pa cguro kung All po lahat yan. E po dapat answer nyan eh basi sa statement All po sya pasok sya sa circle lahat dapat All din ang vice versa nyan hindi sya pwede some sir. Clarify lng po
I don't really understand these type of problems in practical... Cause, if cats circle have birds and parrots.. Then if some of cats are jugs... Why some of birds and parrots can't be jugs??? 🤔
The diagrams are EULER DIAGRAMS --not VENN DIAGRAMS. Venn Diagrams came into existence AFTER Euler had a method. Euler uses circles inside other circles. Venn diagrams never have other circles inside another, but has three overlapping circles at all times. There is only one diagram with three terms no matter what figure with Venn diagrams. Euler digrams depend on the premises and you must draw a according to information given. Venn diagrams are always the same three overlapping circles and ONE WAY to draw them. One way of drawing the diagram makes it better.
Yes, I know their differences, but take note, All Venn diagrams are Euler diagrams, but not all Euler diagrams are Venn diagrams. Euler diagrams only have the intersection combinations that actually exist in the real world. While Venn diagrams represent every hypothetically possible logical relationship between categories.
Finally, I've found someone explain this reasoning like a crystal clear for me, i understand your explanatios more than someone explaining in my own language. TY Sir
Maraming Salamat napakalaking tulong ng mga videos mo po ako po ay naka pasa last August 20, 2023 examination ❤ kanina po yung result ☺
Good luck sa mga mag e-exam follow nyo lang po itong channel marami kayong matututunan.
Grabe very simple, precise and super daling maintindihan ng mga explanations 🎉❤❤❤ More power
Finally! Someone who explains it well to me! in 1 month, I have my 11+ test, and I'm learning this in tuition ans i needed help on this! THANK YOU SIR!!🤩🥰😊💗💓💖
thanks Boss ang galing .walang akong idea about sa ganito.dahil sa simple explanation u naka gets ko agad more power sa youtube channel u boss.
This has explained syllogisms in a way I can fully understand! thank you so much.
Thank you for sharing. I remember last year I tried to apply to one of the companies in Manila I encountered this kind of exam but I ended up with "manghula" 😅😅😅 on that whole part of the exam because I didn't know how to answer it.
Thank you!! I am now confident that i can passed the Analytical Ability in CSE
Sobrang helpful ito talaga rason bat ako nakapasa sa csc gnamit ko lahat ng natutunan ko thank you thank you so so mucj
Ang galing mo sir.. Natuto ako agad.. Naitama ko Q:2&3. Hehe.. Salamat ng marami po. 😅🙏
Am understanding your explanation my great teacher.
I really have a hard time intindihin eto sa mga exam. Ngayun ko lng nakita itong video at na intidihan ko po yung explanation nyu. Thank you po.
Am from Ethiopia, Africa.and I don't have a word to thank.
Oh tysm Sir
I'm from Pakistan
And literally now I am able to solve some logical reasoning after watching your video
U r great ❤
I am gonna hit my medical test tomorrow and this is the part of my exam. Tysm for fading away my doubts
By far, an exceptional video on how to crack 'Syllogism'.. .great work Nomostud
Glad you liked it!
Tysmmm sir I have not understand it but now I can say that it's very easy thanks your method of teaching is best
Thank you for this wonderful and clear explanation!
You're the best in explaining
I'm here after my end sem ARP LR exams , 5 questions of 1 marks came like this and i only watched ur video yesterday
Thankyou
Wonderful and simple explanation, thanks a lot
Nice explanation
thank you so much po very well explained ❤ pag nakapasa po ako this coming aug exam sagot ko na 5 people na magtatake ng exam next year ❤ 🙏
Wow sana isa ako sa makakafree. Sana pumasa po kayo
you gotta conclude and deduce from the diagram if they intersect(in case of some) or overlap (in case of all) then you can say the statement is in concord
Good teacher! thumbs up!
THANK YOU SO MUCH SA KLARONG EXPLANATION.
Your channel really helped in my fast paced cram/ review for UPLAE, thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
👍 Thanks so much for this! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Thank you so much ❤❤❤
Awesome teaching!
In the last example some leaves are ducks right ???
Thank you so much. Very informative video.
Very informative. Thanks
Thank you so much sir!
it's so helpful thanks sir
Thanks sir❤
Thank you and more practice exam on this
For the 2nd question, shouldnt the jugs overlap with birds and parrot as well?
Thanks po for the technique❤
Thank you very useful
But there is always a possibilty that some jugs may overlap both parrots , and /or birds in Question 2.
So can plates.
Fantastic sir ❤❤from jk
It's a huge help.
Amazing tutorial
I got all the answers
Thank you
very helpfull
Thank you!
My opinion is c only( iii) follows
does this work for CAT too?
Thank you. I'm New follower.
Welcome!
OmG THANKS SO MUCH THIS HELPED SO MUCH I SUBSCRIBE
Dito Lang aqo nakaintinde ng ganitong problem
Thank u So much❤
A big thank you
thank you so much
Thanks for this, really helpful
this is really helpful. thank you so much i can finally understand it now!
I disagree with your diagram in the second set of statements. All conclusions do follow. Edit: nevermind
Same. for me Letter C. Only 1 and 2 is the better answer on statement 2
Tama naman po e
Tama naman po e, sobrang layo naman ng pwesto ng plates sa cats at sa bird
It's the same for ig most of us but you gotta conclude and deduce from the diagram if they intersect(in case of some) or overlap (in case of all) then you can say the statement is in concord
3/3 thank you so much
I understand that if they intersect then the conclusion is true. For example, Jugs are Cats. this is true cuz they intersect. But my question is: If both Parrots and Birds are part of Cats, how come the conclusion Jugs are Birds is not correct? Simply because they don't intersect? Please clarify this for me 😊
Yes, they don't intersect. You must only focus by encircling Jugs because it just said some Jugs are part of cats, it means bird is not included. Hope it helps po.
Only ' *some* Jugs are Cats' necessarily follows. 'Jugs are Cats' only *could be* the case
I suppose you meant 'some Jugs are Birds'. And that's not necessarily false, but it doesn't necessarily follow, because the relation between Jugs and Birds or Parrots wasn't specified. It could be that 'some Parrots are Jugs' or even that 'all Birds are Jugs', but that wouldn't have to necessarily be the case
Basically.. you have to consider if the conclusions only *could be* the case or if they *necessarily follow*
@@Ester_Krupova what's the difference between could be the case and just follow
It should be some jugs are birds, but not all
i think in statement 2. letter C. Only I and II is the most better answer.
hey is syllogism applies only if we are looking for conclusion? how about assumptions?
Sir, nalilito Ako sa some cats are parrots Hindi naman po sila nag overlap. 😊
Good! unfortunately you didn't touch enough upon negative premises and conditionals. But maybe it's in a another of your vids, need to check
Ihave an test tommorow on mental ability ❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉😅😊😊
Helpful, but problematic if one must work this out on the spot during a debate, especially without pen and paper. Not being math-gifted, its difficult to think these out on a momentary basis.
Yes, that’s the challenge of this type of logical reasoning.
@nomostud I hope you didn't take my wording of "problematic" to relate in any way to your video or instruction. In fact, I found your instruction here to be extremely helpful, and your diagramming could not have been conveyed more clearly. Reading Aristotle's text, especially without marginalia, is very dense and overwhelming at times to keep on track. Thanks again for the upload!
Thank you.
Statement #2
Diba dapat po "All parrots are bird" kasi nakapasok lahat ng parrots sa Bird. Bat naging tama yung "Some birds are parrot"?
Please reply sir Nomoo? Curios lang po ako
Correct Answer is letter E: none of these
Thank you
Your conclusion 1 (3:31) is incorrect. In Philippines we have Kangkong chips ni Josh Mojica
Clarify lng po sir All parrots are birds all birds are cats tama po ito pero mali pa yata yung some cats are parrots and some birds are parrots. Pwede pa cguro kung All po lahat yan. E po dapat answer nyan eh basi sa statement All po sya pasok sya sa circle lahat dapat All din ang vice versa nyan hindi sya pwede some sir. Clarify lng po
I had a doubt
Statement: Any light is bright. Many light are bulbs.
Pls explain this
That is allike Aristotel argumentation theory.
Thank you po,big help po ito . God bless po
Question number 2. Some cats are parrot. Some birds are parrot parang uncertain
can you explain the explicit and implicit ?
this is not a statement and assumption, this is syllogism... Anyway, I'll upload statement and assumption-related problems soon. Stay cool.
@@nomostud thank you 👍
nlilito po ako sir
2/3 Tink u.
Thanks for this sir 🫡
I love u bro
3/3 thank you
hindi ba all cats are parrots?
In exams time factor decides selection
I got the ansher
Wild
Sir ask po , what if ang question Some jugs are birds. True or false?
Some jugs are parrots. True or false?
Thank youuuu Ma'am/Sir
Ano po ba yan, sa statement na part or conclusion?
@@nomostud Sir/Ma'am What if meron sa Conclusion
V "Some Jugs are Birds"
VI "Some Jugs are Parrots"
Ano po yung sagot? Thank you po 🙏
@@undistake8505 both does not follow all the statements. Since jugs and birds does not intersect. And also jugs and parrots. Refer back to the figure.
@@nomostud Thank you po Ma'am/Sir 🙏
👍🏻💛🙏🏻
I don't really understand these type of problems in practical... Cause, if cats circle have birds and parrots.. Then if some of cats are jugs... Why some of birds and parrots can't be jugs??? 🤔
The diagrams are EULER DIAGRAMS --not VENN DIAGRAMS. Venn Diagrams came into existence AFTER Euler had a method. Euler uses circles inside other circles. Venn diagrams never have other circles inside another, but has three overlapping circles at all times. There is only one diagram with three terms no matter what figure with Venn diagrams. Euler digrams depend on the premises and you must draw a according to information given. Venn diagrams are always the same three overlapping circles and ONE WAY to draw them. One way of drawing the diagram makes it better.
Yes, I know their differences, but take note, All Venn diagrams are Euler diagrams, but not all Euler diagrams are Venn diagrams. Euler diagrams only have the intersection combinations that actually exist in the real world. While Venn diagrams represent every hypothetically possible logical relationship between categories.
10q
Answer for 2 is not correct
the answer is must be all are corect
3/3
Thank you!
Thank you
Thank you