The Strategic Nexus Between Climate Change, Energy and Geopolitics | LSE Event
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 жов 2022
- Explore the strategic nexus between great power conflict, energy independence and climate action - and how to develop effective international strategies that help us prevent catastrophic global warming. #LSEClimateStrategy
Speakers:
Dr Robert Falkner
Dr Rita Floyd
Chair:
Professor Christopher Coker
Full details/attend:
www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2022/10/...
To turn on captions, go to the bottom-right of the video player and click the icon. Please note that this feature uses Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology, or machine generated transcription, and is not 100% accurate.
Featured image (used in thumbnail with watermark added): Photo (www.flickr.com/photos/stateph...) by US Department of State (www.flickr.com/photos/stateph...) on Flickr - public domain US Government work (www.usa.gov/government-works)
Thanks for advancing the climate disaster debate.
What should we study to solve these problems?
Well spoken waffle remains waffle.
Tell her that I loved her thoughtful card. Meghan should bring me mail tomorrow.
What is being said here that was not blindingly obvious 30 years ago?
We apparently ain't very good at exponential change as we play economic-politics fleecing our citizens in the stock markets.
ALL assumptions based on GCM's, 102 of them so far, but none of them have agreed with observational data. Therefore, Oh wise one, you are just making it up as you go along. But don't worry, the paychecks will still arrive on time. That's academia for you.
In regard to many small island nations, they will disappear under the rising oceans at the current pace of curtailing global warming. The sea levels are anticipated to rise 4 meters or more from melting of glaciers, the Greenland Ice cap and Antarcitic melting.
There does not seem to be adequate action to address the reality of the climate emergency facing planet earth!
First of all the carbon emission by human communities is less than 5 % of all CO2 emission.
Second, the increase of the CO2 emission is not the cause of the global warming, just the opposit. In other words, global warming is first then the increased carbon emission is the consequence.
Therefore both presentations are on a bad track.
Unfortunately all we are making a bad response to the climate change.
Suggest to look at the scientific evidences before creating strategies.
I studied the scientific literature and you seem confused. Please, some references that are well supported.
A think tank , not much thinking here