Aqeeda, Iman and Ibadah

Seminars and lessons of Sheikh Dr. Muhammad bin Abdullah Al-Massari
Arabic Channel: / @tajdeed
English Channel / @al-massari
English material is available here: github.com/Isl...
All Arabic social media/material available here: linktr.ee/Tajdeed
Telegram Group - t.me/slamicRen...
Full Video: • Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wah...
Discussion on Aqeeda - Check Your / What is Aqeeda?
- Quran refers to Iman Not Aqeeda
- Iman is not just aqeeda, (a set of reports you believe to be true), that is Tasdeeq/Yakeen
- You have to accept it and live your life according to it to be Mumin
- e.g. People of Firawn - they rejected what Musa AS brought inside their souls they had yaqeen but they rejected
- So say its a convention
○ What did Allah ordered us to know?
- Know that there is only 1 diety,
- Allah knows everything and is comprehensive in knowledge, Etc
○ Quran didnt leave it open
○ Another place specified what should be believed in:
Whoever denies Allah, his books, his messengers, his angels, day of judgement he has gone astray far away
○ They got stuck in secondary issues related to Khabaria and made them into Aqeeda
- Eg mounting the throne
-- Scholars can discuss but shouldnt ask common Muslims to have an opinion on it, take it as it is
-- eg Wife of Aziz tried to seduce Yusuf AS - definitely that is correct, are we obliged to know that? No
○ They got stuck in problems that their ancient scholars arent qualified to study - they are scholars of Hadith/narration but gave certain answers which are likely to be false and want to connect it to Deen and declare people Mubtadi
- Now when it comes to Shirk
○ Ibn Taymiyyah
- Ibn Taymiyyah waivering Ibada as a list of acts
-- What they call act of worship, ritual acts they declare it to be ibadah and if its directed to besides Allah it is Shirk Akbar
○ They Get stuck on the issue of Sujood - family of Yaqub AS made sujood to Yusuf AS
- There definition of Ibadah is fundamentally faulty
- They invented Shirk Al Quboor based on this faulty definition
- Logical fallacy -
○ If A diety is something that is worshipped
-- So Allah wasnt worshipped before creation, therefore he is not a diety, which is a blatant Kufr
○ Point of view leads to kufr - but they are too superficial to
○ MIAW says Ilah wa Ma'Bud is its definition- though Ibn Taymiya doesnt say that
○ This contradicts what the Quran Says - Quran defines what Illah is in Surah Muminoon, 2 types of Ilah
-- Allah has no son and there is no other diety (or offspring)
○ If you say Illah is a ma'bud - you take that Ayyah and put it in the bin
- In reference to Al Badawi (grave) in Egypt MIAW said - if you ask him for help you make him Allah!

[@malek83031]

May Allah supports, protects, and blesses you

[@malek83031]

Change the word ibadah to Bid'ah