You may say our tactics are costly, but think about it. the U.K. used to be number 1. Now with its sub-par attitude its allowed them to let nations pass them. the US Marines have had the same tactics since there creation(exception being Vertical Envelopment). and We have had our loses but by far we've had more success than loss
EFV would have been a great idea and a game changer somewhere in the 1970s to mid 80s when the anti ship missiles had a general range of around 75 miles. Then it was a good idea to position your amphibious assault ships 80 miles from the shore and start releasing these EFVs into water. But when the whole project was cancelled (in 2011) EVF as a concept was dead. Anti ship missile's ranges have significantly risen with most of the new missiles having at least 200 miles range. Then the afore mentioned concept has no merit at all. Most of the Marines in the future will go to the hostile beaches jumping out of the Ospreys, covered by F-35Bs (and the complete US navy together with the Air force)..LOL).
to construct FOB , defence , bridges , barracks , refuelling points for gunships , medical bays , communications , logistical base , and other infastructe needed. also the air cover saplied by apache gunship could easy wipe out most armour on the battle field and would make it almost imposable for a counter attack. once this is done the RM would get more renforcements from the British army witch has 100s of 1000 of men. then they would push on all fronts capturing more beachs from the rear-
In VN, operating south of Hue- we watched as the Marines came ashore in a predecessor to this vehicle- one ran over a 500 lb bomb set up as a mine- Wham! That thing opened up like a puffball- 30 Marines with it. I could not believe the damage - our US Army patton tanks hit by the same mine would shake up the crew- might be some bloody lips and bit tongues- but, Man! These light weight armored vehicles just blast to tiny pieces and eveyone inside in pieces, too.
and the mk 5 can carry small armour and 50 men so 4 main tanks and about 300 men plus 12 Vikings with 120 men from them could capture a beach very easily. also hms ocean is cable of carrying 830 men and 40 vehicles plus 18 helicopters so a synchronized attack from hms ocean , hms bulwark and hms albion could capture 3 separate beaches and could spread out with reinforcements being brought back from those ships.
after that the marines would conduct a landing with 1,000-2,000 men strong enough for any beach landing. troops would be put on the beach by Vikings and landing craft. with a large amount of sapresing fire from the landing craft and Vikings GPMG and 50CAL with men pushing in land to about a mile sea kings , chinooks and other helicopters. would land dropping of armour and more men such as warriors , bulldogs , land rovers , challengers, and other armour and the UK have some of the best armour -
peace through strength my friend thats why no one fucks with us which gives us the freedom to live our lives peacefully see how that works if we wanted to take a country we would have done so already no problem
I would never say the RM are crap. I respect them just as much as my Marines. Personally i wanted to just state a small flaw in your comment. I hate when people bring UK vs US into things after all were closer allies than most
the RN doe have hovercraft but only ment for troops. they have large landing craft cable of taking a challenger main battle tank! also the RM doe have there equivalent of the AAVs witch is the Viking a 2 part APC witch is amphibious. witch carrys 10 men far smaller than the US but the RM have always used smaller units to accomplished there objectives unlike the yanks who have favoured large infantry with large mechanized units. also the choppers would not have to land but could carry them -
I think it's around 2004 2005 ish because there are a few episodes that talk about "operation Iraqi freedom"; the invasion of Iraq as if it were ongoing.
I'm not sure, they have M1 steel pots and PASGTs which would make sense in the 80s but seeing the PASGT vest is off putting I'm pretty sure it's s lot of random footage, because their taking about the osprey and EFV which were talked about as their coming soon
When descriptive text scrolls across the screen with "M1 Abrams" etc., it's accompanied by a phony electronic beeping which sounds like a phone ringing in the background. That was driving me insane! I kept thinking the phone was ringing upstairs.
so any marines out there US or UK you legends your both great you put your lifes on the line and the RM and US marines together well there gunna wish they didnt start the fight in the first place!! so no one say either core can doe shit they can both doe catastrophic damage to the enemy defence by land air or sea there gunna win cause there determined to and there no stopping a determined marine and his rifle.
true and tbh we have not go any air assist launched from carriers as parlimetn had a blonde moment and got rid of them for the mean time while we wait for the f-35 :( but we have the 2nd RAF typhoons and tornados armed with JADAMS and laser guided bombs filled by tanker aircraft could doe just as good or even better job that the USMC and if your aerial bombardment is good enough and armour on the beach is enough to lay down fire from the saftly of light armour. casualties should be low
intercept by enemy aircraft even with fighter protection there would still be fredinly loss even with the jamming gear and counter measures there would be loss. and the nimitz class aircraft carrier could taken out by low flying enemy aircraft below radar and could launch multiple missle and even though GOAL KEEPERS would shoot down many missile they would have that covered by shooting a large amount of missile to many for the counter measures to handle.
ehrm dude....i think that video is from the 80s/90s....They are using Video Material from the 90s so i guess its late 90s , the M16A4 wasnt out arround that time
in the world with RPG and rocket protection such as metal grids on the side hand held rockets would be a waste of time to fire at the tanks and APC except modern weapons such as javlin witch come from above but very few counties have them. the armour and mas of men would push in further and further and as enemy logistical routes have been crippled there on there back foot and would forced to retreat miles back so in a day the RM would have established a deep beach head and call in engineers -
yea very true but a carrier is fare easier to alert enemy defence than a squadron of strike aircraft at low level. but marines and armour would land first eliminate AA weapons then bring in the choppers. well most NATO country's have the best UAV savailce equipment on the plant so that with a tomahawk strike from a destroyer could clear almost 80% of enemy forces from the beach so it would be made easier well in 6 years we will have carrier born aircraft back and there is no -
under the helicopter and drop them off and be out of the combat area in a matter of 30 seconds. also they would only bring in tanks and over armour by air once the infantry and other amour has taken them out and pushed them back a far bit to provide a safe entry with very small risk compared to before. also the albion class landing platform dock carrys 8 landing craft 4 mk5 and 4 mk10 the mk10 can carry one tank plus 10 men or 4 light armoured vechials or 120 men.
indication of a upcoming need for a assault. but the typhoon has been prove to land and take off on a aircraft carrier with out bungee or catapult as it was proven by a high ranking officer in the RAF meaning we could work something out and we have many base all round the world so the journey would not have to be so far but further than could be. well the paras would work in conjunction being deployed behind enemy lines in mass numbers creating mass panic to logistics and reinforcements.
Nice assessment from an armchair wanna be strategist, if you wanna make an assessment about UK Marines go to the UK Marines page. USMC have different doctrine Lastly try not to compare both nations Marines, they're allies and have different views, doctrines, strategy, weapons, vehicles and men/women serving in the respective Marines. I hate when people try to undermine amd compare either USMC or RM.
also by the time any affair comes up witch we need a sea to land invasion it would be about 2018-2022 something like that and the royal navy would have the queen Elizabeth class 2 aircraft carrier the most techonolgicaly advanced ship of the time. even though its just short of the size of the Nimitz it will be armed with the f-35 cable of deep strikes and after all enemy radar is down fly in with under wing rails giving them far large payload but no stealth but enemy radar has been taken out!
as they have pushed deep enough to get behind them and now our in a flanking position. once this is done as it would not take long to attack a beach ment for defending from the other way the RM could capture many miles of beach and ports witch is needed to bring in cargo ships full of medical sapplys, food , water , ammo , men , tanks and fuel once this is established the British force would continue to push for day until there many many miles in land and have captured 100s of square miles of -
cripple enemy logistical routes and convoys. destroy bridges to slow down enemy renforcements. and over SF team would be put in to destroy heavy defended areas so troops would have a greater chance of victory. so the royal marines could make a successful victory with there 9,000 men with a swift SF team launched to render the enemy's air defence obsolete. leaving a handful of smaller ones spread out and shoulder fired weapons. followed by a large missile strike from frigates and destroyers-
☺️In Antiterrorism we had enough three ships × three Attack Hels , other Troops' Vehicles , on Water , on Air ones...Jets are for intruding and can be Idle now...
How many Russian Marines are there? How many fighter planes do they have?Tanks/ artillery pieces? amphibious assault vehicles?Attack Helicopters? Transport helicopters? Not counting stuff belonging to Russian army or air force or navy.
true how ever i did say SAM our put out of action by ground units before hand such as the SAS or SBS witch could doe that job very well. also most coutrys witch would be attacked and in this case Argentine is the UK number one opponent as the facklands our in a risky position atm and there SAM couldn't even touch a tomahawk. but i seem to remember in Libya been attacked by a tomahwak strike against SAM sites to be followed by air units like f-18 and tornados.
Nor will they, we are allies and hope to remain so long after you and I are gone. Much better having the Royal Marines fighting right along side US Marines kicking the sh_t out of anyone dumb enough to come up against them. We shed blood together in Europe and all over the world so I guess we could call ourselves, Royal and US Marines, a band of brothers....
Usmc has done more amphibious landings and operations than the Royal Navy so far, USMC also has larger force and have their own fighter planes, tanks, artillery and AA mounts. They only need the Navy or the Air Force to carry them to the combat zone
and after every one was done the UK sent in apache gunship witch had 0 casultys inflicted heavy damage to there armed force and also repealed every single shoulder fired rocket they fired. but i doe see your point. and as every single country pretty much with the technology to repel cruise missile and have competing technology is on our side such as France, Germany , Netherlands and we know NATO and Russia aint going to happen. how ever AWACS and slow bombers our a very easy target to be -
once forces have pushed in enough and would of captured one of the the enemy airbase based close to the shore witch would be a big objective and once that is captured the air force could operate there typhoons and tornado's from it. and with the most advanced air to air fighter jet in any NATO countrie would achieve aerial dominance and allow the tornado to destroy any ground threat to the ground forces.
Brits were not ineffective, the British forces did what brits do best, act as peacekeepers retoriing the local population and training them to look after themselves, with an exception for building a bridge that seemed to take a stupidly long time to build. As for "never gave it back".... My cousin was in the taskforce that was brought back into the region, lol.
The best of the best usa marine assaults land got fully fier power support from sea, air n land armo vichcle light n heavy ground machine with full range of marine weapon variety of deadly ground fier power what u c, that what the enemy gona cop it hard.+variety air power n war ships say it all.
We fought on our land,1861 to 1865, 680,000 died, but your point is well-taken. We're arrogant. Oceans protect us, something few other countries enjoy. We expanded the war in Vietnam on a hoax, an incident in the Gulf of Tonkin which did not happen. We went into Iraq twice, once after Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait looking for oil money to pay for the 8-year war he started with Iran, then a second time looking for WMDs, which except for some gas did not exist and he had buried his jet fighters.
outnumbered is not needed but out gunned is a defo need with large AA or AAA weapons destroyed by air or tomahawk Apache gunship could come in and rain hell down and with supreme counter measures could avoid shoulder fired weapons and in most case take time to lock on and that needs a clear shot witch would be him clear on thermal so would be raped by its cannon. well in my view the RM could easy take a large beech swiftly but so could the USMC or many NATO coutrys marines deviation
51 cents of every taxdollar goes into military, it's just sad man.... the Government should spent the money for its people and not against the rest of the world, there is enough to spent money in in the USA e.g. social projects.
land making it clear that they have penetrated the enemy lines destroyed most of there forces and would keep going as the deeper you our in a country the easier. as they never expected you to get this deep so there defence our poor as have been built in a short time so will not be as well built or prepared so it is easier to push in and after time they would of dumped almost the hole army on beaches and inland and would of for filled there objective
america always say this clise words ' marine are the best amphibious troop in the world'....pffttttt,, like there is no others troop tht can beat them...........Vet can
no not realy as counter measures today our very high tec and would allow many planes or helicopters the chance to escape. this is a observation but your making out you aircraft carriers to be able to be the death star! everything can be destroyed a enemy submarine could destroy and triple your fleet and render your forces helpless. and no SAM and there radars now a days or stationed in groups called SAM sites not all spread out. 6 groups of SF teams 12 man strong could destroy 6 SAM site-
plus they shouldnt be high anyway in modern warfare the RM dont take that as a option. they will train there men so lives our saved and give them the equipment like Vikings and sea kings to drop men behind the lines and to charge up front to secure a beach land the armour and reniforcemnts and push the secure a large beach head or a runway/ port the bring in the army and navy and rain hell on the rest of the county or area of the fighting
you don't need 10s of thousands of men to take a beach what you need is tactics skill determination and technology witch the RM have plenty of i admit in size to the US were dead in technology we share and have similar gear. tactics we have our own but both good but skills makes us different our RM our better trained as our basic course is almost twice of the US and British forces our well known for it!! im not saying the US core is shit its great in my view but the RM can still pack a punch
lol this vid starts with the narrater saying that the us marines are the best in the world...well that not rite because the the very first us marines were trained by the royal marines in ww2 and i think you'll find that the royal marines are the best amphibius troops in the world and NOT the us marines
chris smith That's be wrong the first marines were created in the American revolution. The marines never served with the royal marine in WWII either. The Royal Marines are also not very much of an amphibious force in modern times. I'd consider them more like the U.S navy seals
We as Marines got some of the baddest equipment and I have been lucky enough seen all of them in action
The US Marines have been around since the American Revolution.
Thanks for the compliment.
You may say our tactics are costly, but think about it. the U.K. used to be number 1. Now with its sub-par attitude its allowed them to let nations pass them. the US Marines have had the same tactics since there creation(exception being Vertical Envelopment). and We have had our loses but by far we've had more success than loss
EFV would have been a great idea and a game changer somewhere in the 1970s to mid 80s when the anti ship missiles had a general range of around 75 miles. Then it was a good idea to position your amphibious assault ships 80 miles from the shore and start releasing these EFVs into water. But when the whole project was cancelled (in 2011) EVF as a concept was dead. Anti ship missile's ranges have significantly risen with most of the new missiles having at least 200 miles range. Then the afore mentioned concept has no merit at all. Most of the Marines in the future will go to the hostile beaches jumping out of the Ospreys, covered by F-35Bs (and the complete US navy together with the Air force)..LOL).
My last 2 ships were Gators; USS Whidbey Island LSD 41 and USS Wasp LHD 1.
Hell yea marines are unstoppable my dad who was a marine in Vietnam knows this.
US Marines have their own. Just need a ride from US Navy. Thats why they are the best
to construct FOB , defence , bridges , barracks , refuelling points for gunships , medical bays , communications , logistical base , and other infastructe needed. also the air cover saplied by apache gunship could easy wipe out most armour on the battle field and would make it almost imposable for a counter attack. once this is done the RM would get more renforcements from the British army witch has 100s of 1000 of men. then they would push on all fronts capturing more beachs from the rear-
In VN, operating south of Hue- we watched as the Marines came ashore in a predecessor to this vehicle- one ran over a 500 lb bomb set up as a mine- Wham! That thing opened up like a puffball- 30 Marines with it. I could not believe the damage - our US Army patton tanks hit by the same mine would shake up the crew- might be some bloody lips and bit tongues- but, Man! These light weight armored vehicles just blast to tiny pieces and eveyone inside in pieces, too.
I think it will keep people in check. I mean, would you go up against this?
Tarawa class ships are out of Commission. USS Wasp class LHD and the newer USS America LHA class are the primary classes of assault ships
Apple and the US war machine seem to share the same PR department. The best one we have Ever seen! No other is like it! Truly remarkable!
+Jakob Moller You want his trousers ? ;)
wihlke '
Jakob Moller ö
Jakob Molle
Jakob Molle
and the mk 5 can carry small armour and 50 men so 4 main tanks and about 300 men plus 12 Vikings with 120 men from them could capture a beach very easily. also hms ocean is cable of carrying 830 men and 40 vehicles plus 18 helicopters so a synchronized attack from hms ocean , hms bulwark and hms albion could capture 3 separate beaches and could spread out with reinforcements being brought back from those ships.
At 20:20 with those troops hanging open won't they be sitting targets from enemy ground troops to pick them off?
after that the marines would conduct a landing with 1,000-2,000 men strong enough for any beach landing. troops would be put on the beach by Vikings and landing craft. with a large amount of sapresing fire from the landing craft and Vikings GPMG and 50CAL with men pushing in land to about a mile sea kings , chinooks and other helicopters. would land dropping of armour and more men such as warriors , bulldogs , land rovers , challengers, and other armour and the UK have some of the best armour -
peace through strength my friend thats why no one fucks with us which gives us the freedom to live our lives peacefully see how that works if we wanted to take a country we would have done so already no problem
I would never say the RM are crap. I respect them just as much as my Marines. Personally i wanted to just state a small flaw in your comment. I hate when people bring UK vs US into things after all were closer allies than most
How many tanks the Royal Marines have? Fighter Planes? Artillery Pieces?Attack Helicopters?Swimming assault vehicles?
the RN doe have hovercraft but only ment for troops. they have large landing craft cable of taking a challenger main battle tank! also the RM doe have there equivalent of the AAVs witch is the Viking a 2 part APC witch is amphibious. witch carrys 10 men far smaller than the US but the RM have always used smaller units to accomplished there objectives unlike the yanks who have favoured large infantry with large mechanized units. also the choppers would not have to land but could carry them -
When was this video actually produced? many of these aircraft are no longer used....
Late 90s I think
I think it's around 2004 2005 ish because there are a few episodes that talk about "operation Iraqi freedom"; the invasion of Iraq as if it were ongoing.
I'm not sure, they have M1 steel pots and PASGTs which would make sense in the 80s but seeing the PASGT vest is off putting I'm pretty sure it's s lot of random footage, because their taking about the osprey and EFV which were talked about as their coming soon
Ocean View Tree Services so 1998-2004 time
When descriptive text scrolls across the screen with "M1 Abrams" etc., it's accompanied by a phony electronic beeping which sounds like a phone ringing in the background. That was driving me insane! I kept thinking the phone was ringing upstairs.
so any marines out there US or UK you legends your both great you put your lifes on the line and the RM and US marines together well there gunna wish they didnt start the fight in the first place!! so no one say either core can doe shit they can both doe catastrophic damage to the enemy defence by land air or sea there gunna win cause there determined to and there no stopping a determined marine and his rifle.
true and tbh we have not go any air assist launched from carriers as parlimetn had a blonde moment and got rid of them for the mean time while we wait for the f-35 :( but we have the 2nd RAF typhoons and tornados armed with JADAMS and laser guided bombs filled by tanker aircraft could doe just as good or even better job that the USMC and if your aerial bombardment is good enough and armour on the beach is enough to lay down fire from the saftly of light armour. casualties should be low
intercept by enemy aircraft even with fighter protection there would still be fredinly loss even with the jamming gear and counter measures there would be loss. and the nimitz class aircraft carrier could taken out by low flying enemy aircraft below radar and could launch multiple missle and even though GOAL KEEPERS would shoot down many missile they would have that covered by shooting a large amount of missile to many for the counter measures to handle.
just noticed you replied after month from your reply
As long as tasted British weather for a year, I can say, without any doubt, that the whole British Army can be considered as amphibius.
ehrm dude....i think that video is from the 80s/90s....They are using Video Material from the 90s so i guess its late 90s , the M16A4 wasnt out arround that time
in the world with RPG and rocket protection such as metal grids on the side hand held rockets would be a waste of time to fire at the tanks and APC except modern weapons such as javlin witch come from above but very few counties have them. the armour and mas of men would push in further and further and as enemy logistical routes have been crippled there on there back foot and would forced to retreat miles back so in a day the RM would have established a deep beach head and call in engineers -
yea very true but a carrier is fare easier to alert enemy defence than a squadron of strike aircraft at low level. but marines and armour would land first eliminate AA weapons then bring in the choppers. well most NATO country's have the best UAV savailce equipment on the plant so that with a tomahawk strike from a destroyer could clear almost 80% of enemy forces from the beach so it would be made easier well in 6 years we will have carrier born aircraft back and there is no -
under the helicopter and drop them off and be out of the combat area in a matter of 30 seconds. also they would only bring in tanks and over armour by air once the infantry and other amour has taken them out and pushed them back a far bit to provide a safe entry with very small risk compared to before. also the albion class landing platform dock carrys 8 landing craft 4 mk5 and 4 mk10 the mk10 can carry one tank plus 10 men or 4 light armoured vechials or 120 men.
indication of a upcoming need for a assault. but the typhoon has been prove to land and take off on a aircraft carrier with out bungee or catapult as it was proven by a high ranking officer in the RAF meaning we could work something out and we have many base all round the world so the journey would not have to be so far but further than could be. well the paras would work in conjunction being deployed behind enemy lines in mass numbers creating mass panic to logistics and reinforcements.
Nice assessment from an armchair wanna be strategist, if you wanna make an assessment about UK Marines go to the UK Marines page. USMC have different doctrine
Lastly try not to compare both nations Marines, they're allies and have different views, doctrines, strategy, weapons, vehicles and men/women serving in the respective Marines. I hate when people try to undermine amd compare either USMC or RM.
also by the time any affair comes up witch we need a sea to land invasion it would be about 2018-2022 something like that and the royal navy would have the queen Elizabeth class 2 aircraft carrier the most techonolgicaly advanced ship of the time. even though its just short of the size of the Nimitz it will be armed with the f-35 cable of deep strikes and after all enemy radar is down fly in with under wing rails giving them far large payload but no stealth but enemy radar has been taken out!
Ford class CV enters the chat, try again
as they have pushed deep enough to get behind them and now our in a flanking position. once this is done as it would not take long to attack a beach ment for defending from the other way the RM could capture many miles of beach and ports witch is needed to bring in cargo ships full of medical sapplys, food , water , ammo , men , tanks and fuel once this is established the British force would continue to push for day until there many many miles in land and have captured 100s of square miles of -
Battlefield 3 :)
cripple enemy logistical routes and convoys. destroy bridges to slow down enemy renforcements. and over SF team would be put in to destroy heavy defended areas so troops would have a greater chance of victory. so the royal marines could make a successful victory with there 9,000 men with a swift SF team launched to render the enemy's air defence obsolete. leaving a handful of smaller ones spread out and shoulder fired weapons. followed by a large missile strike from frigates and destroyers-
☺️In Antiterrorism we had enough three ships × three Attack Hels , other Troops' Vehicles , on Water , on Air ones...Jets are for intruding and can be Idle now...
Best of the best
+Popo lol from Russia
How many Russian Marines are there? How many fighter planes do they have?Tanks/ artillery pieces? amphibious assault vehicles?Attack Helicopters? Transport helicopters? Not counting stuff belonging to Russian army or air force or navy.
Nano flies
never gave it back to the Brits who were ineffective in Helmand
true how ever i did say SAM our put out of action by ground units before hand such as the SAS or SBS witch could doe that job very well. also most coutrys witch would be attacked and in this case Argentine is the UK number one opponent as the facklands our in a risky position atm and there SAM couldn't even touch a tomahawk. but i seem to remember in Libya been attacked by a tomahwak strike against SAM sites to be followed by air units like f-18 and tornados.
They've clearly never been against Royal Marines
the us marines have better amphibious capabilities
Nor will they, we are allies and hope to remain so long after you and I are gone. Much better having the Royal Marines fighting right along side US Marines kicking the sh_t out of anyone dumb enough to come up against them. We shed blood together in Europe and all over the world so I guess we could call ourselves, Royal and US Marines, a band of brothers....
You'd better hope the US Marine Corps never comes for you and yours.
Gamer No just the much more ferocious Japanese in WW2 who humiliated the British in Singapore
Usmc has done more amphibious landings and operations than the Royal Navy so far, USMC also has larger force and have their own fighter planes, tanks, artillery and AA mounts. They only need the Navy or the Air Force to carry them to the combat zone
Plenty, it's called the fucking Royal navy!
USMC is still there in Helmand in charge of the province. Dont know what your talking about. And Marines are supposed to be killers, not peackeepers
and after every one was done the UK sent in apache gunship witch had 0 casultys inflicted heavy damage to there armed force and also repealed every single shoulder fired rocket they fired. but i doe see your point. and as every single country pretty much with the technology to repel cruise missile and have competing technology is on our side such as France, Germany , Netherlands and we know NATO and Russia aint going to happen. how ever AWACS and slow bombers our a very easy target to be -
Where do you live anyways?
once forces have pushed in enough and would of captured one of the the enemy airbase based close to the shore witch would be a big objective and once that is captured the air force could operate there typhoons and tornado's from it. and with the most advanced air to air fighter jet in any NATO countrie would achieve aerial dominance and allow the tornado to destroy any ground threat to the ground forces.
We're Americans, we do what we want. Get over it.
Brits were not ineffective, the British forces did what brits do best, act as peacekeepers retoriing the local population and training them to look after themselves, with an exception for building a bridge that seemed to take a stupidly long time to build.
As for "never gave it back".... My cousin was in the taskforce that was brought back into the region, lol.
It still ends by a discouraging withdraw out of Vietnam!
Then expect to have no system to educate.
Well, when you have the numbers and guns, you can say that :p
But 1 thing they will never have, the commando badge :p
Do you mean like the Royal Marines Commando? USMC have their own special forces like the Force Recon. Try again lil man
This technology is the old shit, now America has that new shit...
The best of the best usa marine assaults land got fully fier power support from sea, air n land armo vichcle light n heavy ground machine with full range of marine weapon variety of deadly ground fier power what u c, that what the enemy gona cop it hard.+variety air power n war ships say it all.
We fought on our land,1861 to 1865, 680,000 died, but your point is well-taken. We're arrogant. Oceans protect us, something few other countries enjoy. We expanded the war in Vietnam on a hoax, an incident in the Gulf of Tonkin which did not happen. We went into Iraq twice, once after Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait looking for oil money to pay for the 8-year war he started with Iran, then a second time looking for WMDs, which except for some gas did not exist and he had buried his jet fighters.
outnumbered is not needed but out gunned is a defo need with large AA or AAA weapons destroyed by air or tomahawk Apache gunship could come in and rain hell down and with supreme counter measures could avoid shoulder fired weapons and in most case take time to lock on and that needs a clear shot witch would be him clear on thermal so would be raped by its cannon. well in my view the RM could easy take a large beech swiftly but so could the USMC or many NATO coutrys marines deviation
51 cents of every taxdollar goes into military, it's just sad man.... the Government should spent the money for its people and not against the rest of the world, there is enough to spent money in in the USA e.g. social projects.
land making it clear that they have penetrated the enemy lines destroyed most of there forces and would keep going as the deeper you our in a country the easier. as they never expected you to get this deep so there defence our poor as have been built in a short time so will not be as well built or prepared so it is easier to push in and after time they would of dumped almost the hole army on beaches and inland and would of for filled there objective
america always say this clise words ' marine are the best amphibious troop in the world'....pffttttt,, like there is no others troop tht can beat them...........Vet can
no not realy as counter measures today our very high tec and would allow many planes or helicopters the chance to escape. this is a observation but your making out you aircraft carriers to be able to be the death star! everything can be destroyed a enemy submarine could destroy and triple your fleet and render your forces helpless. and no SAM and there radars now a days or stationed in groups called SAM sites not all spread out. 6 groups of SF teams 12 man strong could destroy 6 SAM site-
losing my ass
It'll be a great day when education gets all the money it wants and the Air Force has to hold a bake sale to buy bombers.
If you look at what stupid things kids are getting their degrees in these days, you'll notice we're already spending too much money on education.
Yah I would be mad if I wasn't an American either. Sucks to suck.
plus they shouldnt be high anyway in modern warfare the RM dont take that as a option. they will train there men so lives our saved and give them the equipment like Vikings and sea kings to drop men behind the lines and to charge up front to secure a beach land the armour and reniforcemnts and push the secure a large beach head or a runway/ port the bring in the army and navy and rain hell on the rest of the county or area of the fighting
you don't need 10s of thousands of men to take a beach what you need is tactics skill determination and technology witch the RM have plenty of i admit in size to the US were dead in technology we share and have similar gear. tactics we have our own but both good but skills makes us different our RM our better trained as our basic course is almost twice of the US and British forces our well known for it!! im not saying the US core is shit its great in my view but the RM can still pack a punch
henry leggett the usmc and the Royal Marines a both great fighting units but with much different capabilities.
Propaganda. Dont show this to a current vet, they will probably get pissed.
lol this vid starts with the narrater saying that the us marines are the best in the world...well that not rite because the the very first us marines were trained by the royal marines in ww2 and i think you'll find that the royal marines are the best amphibius troops in the world and NOT the us marines
chris smith That's be wrong the first marines were created in the American revolution. The marines never served with the royal marine in WWII either. The Royal Marines are also not very much of an amphibious force in modern times. I'd consider them more like the U.S navy seals
Some of the early Marine raiders got some training from the brits but the training for amphibious warfare begain years before.
who trained them the British
I hear its a American program, calling americans best in the world :p
so much bs in this vid
poor american propaganda..
USMC all theway hoorah hoo fucking rah! >:D