Movie Theories That Will Ruin Your Childhood
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2023
- Tune in for some movie theories that will absolutely ruin your childhood!
Suggest a topic here to be turned into a video: bit.ly/2kwqhuh
Subscribe for more! ► goo.gl/pgcoq1 ◄
Stay updated ► goo.gl/JyGcTt goo.gl/5c8dzr ◄
For copyright queries or general inquiries please get in touch: hello@beamazed.com
Legal Stuff.
Unless otherwise created by BeAmazed, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources: pastebin.com/sDha7AGa
Actually, it's theorized that Mary Poppins is a Time Lord; she has a traveling bag that is substantially larger on the inside, she wears a bow tie (which is Cool), her umbrella is something of a TARDIS (bit of a stretch, that), she's elusive, mysterious, refuses to "explain anything," and can speak to animals. Now with Emily Blunt taking over, we know Mary Poppins can regenerate...
Bro even as a kid I knew that Mary Poppins had to be some kind of immortal deity
Similarly, I think that Mary poppins is either a witch, or an angel, but leaning towards angel more becauyes. Well, she doesn't seem like the type to curse.
@@christianndlovu-lh7vuit spelled because
@@shahidsiddiqui2836 bra
I think Mary is a hogworts witch her wand is her umbrella like hagrids and hermoine had an enchanted bag like Mary's 😂
Don’t forget that Hook is blamed for the death of Ariel’s mother
Oh yeah.
"Blamed" is the keyword, my friends :)
Ariel's mother died because that dumb bitch decided an easily replaced music box was worth dying and leaving her children without a mother for.
Wait... wouldn't he be in Neverland?
@@madelinearmstrong-tuapola3965 i think Ariel's mother lived in neverland and Hook was blamed for allegedly killing her
My favorite line in "Cars" is when Mac finds Lightning, and says, "Thank The Manufacturer you're okay!"
Oh, Humans. Yay. We get the theory that's a definite Stretch more likely.
@@ronturcsak5123 My bros in the Garage: "Yep. We're just a Joke to you." Don't Overthink it.✌️😜
The Manufacturer would be their God.
In the original book, we see that all the children actually _SURVIVE_ and Wonka didn't kill them. And Roald Dhal also said that he hated the first film in an interveiw.
The same count for the 2005 film
@@sonicfanboy3375 I remember reading it, Mike ended up like, 7 feet tall
I don't blame him
The Gene Wilder Wonka has a horrible temper!
In the Oompa Loompa song in the book it says that Augustus gets melted and cooked in to hot fudge and in the 2005 move Augustus’ mum says the folowing “please don’t eat you fingers” “but they taste so good!” So Augustus got melted into hot fudge
Well, that fly scene is obviously a nod to the original 1958 movie "The Fly" where the scientist who merged with the fly is trapped in a spider web, with the body of a fly but the head and arm of a human, who screams "Help me! Help me!" as the spider crawls closer and closer. Conversely, the scientist character has the head and left arm of a fly. It's pretty darn creepy, and much less gruesome than the remake in the 80s.
I was going to say the same
Ooh
The spider in the original doesn’t eat him either. He puts him out of his misery with a rock if I can remember rightly.
@@MasterBlaster3545Being just a child when I watched The Fly I don't recall the manor of death, but yes, he puts him out of his misery before the spider can get him.
Dam, thx for the info
Problem with Willy Wonka theory - if you read the book (and I believe they fixed this omission in the Johnny Depp version), Charlie sees the other kids leave the factory. Violet is still blue but no longer round, Veruca is covered in garbage, Mike is stretched, and I can't remember but I think Augustus is just covered in chocolate.
And then there's the "rated R" version Corridor Crew made, where we actually see them die
Yeah, Augustus was covered in chocolate. I hated the Depp version but I'm pretty sure he's leaving the factory and his mom says "stop licking yourself", to which he replies "but I taste so good" due to the chocolate.
(I admit, I didn't care for either movie but if I had to pick one, it would have to be the first one, lol; Though I never read the book so I can't judge from the book vs movie point of view)
The scene where Charlie and his grandfather sneak some of the fizzy lifting pop isn't in the book.
@@dragonfan2815 Yep
Yeah, Augustus was "thin as a straw" according to Grandpa Joe. And according to the oompa loompas, they said "he won't be harmed" and "I must admit, he will be altered quite a bit", they knew Augustus would be changed. They knew all the children would survive, but they would also be different in the end. I must admit, I enjoy the book version more than the movies, no offence. Willy Wonka tries to stop bad children from being in danger too. But of course they won't listen.
Fun fact: in the original Peter Pan book, instead of taking Wendy and the other kids home, he just locks the windows to make the kids think they were unloved
(I think)
😳😰😱😨
Yeesh
He'd have to do more than that, they'd also have to explain WHY they had a room FULL of kid's beds and toys, AND, that's just ONE thing I can think of! However, it's an interesting theory.
Grinch theory is not right
Actually In the original story of Peter Pan, he closes the windows 🪟 to make the children 👧 👦 think they are unloved 💔 and will live in Neverland with him. Though still yours is still interesting.
I think the theory of Mary Poppins being the same type of creature as Pennywise is possible. Though I think that it’s kinda like a good one evil one situation. They both disappear for about 27-30 years (Mary Poppins Returns furthered my suspicion) and their main audience is children. I also notice they both can mess with reality to create things like dolphins in bathtubs or burning hands pushing through a door, but I notice how Mary Poppins only creates happy creations while Pennywise only creates disturbing creations. I think Mary Poppins gets her power through joy which would explain her interest in helping children with their problems while Pennywise gets his power through fear. Mary Poppins goes out of her way to make her creations as joyful and magical as possible to get the most amount of joy to feed off of while Pennywise tries to be as scary as possible to get the most amount of fear to feed off of. So I think they’re the same type of entity but Mary Poppins is the good one and Pennywise is the evil one. So I agree with your theory, but I shift more to the opinion that they are simply the same type of entity, not the same person.
I'd be very interested to find out what happens every 25*27=675 years!
Makes sense with what we know theory wise and whatnot!
I mean, they could be the same multi-faceted character...
Totally
I prefer Pennywise to Poppins
I like the time lord theory better
The theory that Jar-Jar was intended to be a Sith in disguise would've been a very clever twist. Him willingly choosing to play as a bumbling ally to manipulate events and corrupt Anikin to the Dark Side is a surprising way to add in a twist villain.
Take a look at Professor Quirrell from Harry Potter as an example. I'm sure a lot of people didn't expect that he was only pretending to be a timid man to find the Philosopher's Stone for Voldemort.
I recall actually reading about that twist having been an actual plan for Binks, his character being an actual Jedi. Unfortunately think the source is lost or was removed. Sith, Dark Jedi.
Binks is interesting to me whichever way he's portrayed.
cope that starwars had good writing. it was a cool concept done poorly
I WAS ABT TO WATCH HARRY POTTER WHY DID U SPOIL😭😭😭
Its okay tho ig
@@bellathesuperpoms the very first movie yes. Move on
@@gabrielgyorffy1373 my mum said i could only watch it when i turned 13 so yeah that was a spoiler for me its okay tho
You forgot the theory about Mary Poppins being a Time Lord!
OH MY- MOM COME CHECK THIS OUT
Matpat is that you
I think that because a Mary Poppins x IT theory was shown, it would be a bit awkward to introduce another, but maybe in the next one.
Pennywise wasn’t a thing when they made the first Mary Poppins movie
I honestly think she’s some form of goddess because time lords can’t make or bend reality the way Mary Poppins does
Kevin is just a kid trying to protect himself from the bad guys as the traps are made of things someone would use. Plus Kevin's hallucinations are caused by stress by the criminals trying to get in
Bestie he dropped a hot iron on someone. If you have seen a horror movie where someone used one and burned themself or someone else, you know how those scars work
Also the “Hallucinations”, he’s Eight years-old. It’s his imagination.
Ok but in the second movie it wasn’t self defense. I get he wanted to stop the robbery but he really didn’t have to electrocute them or drop them from a tall building
Kevin is 8 years old and Kramer 52 when he died in saw 3 in 2006 which would mean he was born in 1954 and Kevin in 1982
I once thought that it wasn't Wonka who was the bad guy but the Oompah's and it's more trauma than just being bad. I believe they were shunned from society and Wonka welcomed them with open arms but they got furious when he decided to open his doors to the public because it was their sanctuary where they could just be themselves. Not wanting people invading their home, they were the ones who told Wonka to show them certain parts of the factory because they had manipulated those areas to be harmful to the children. That's why in the 2nd movie, all the kids leave as "weirdos", now they'll stand out like the Oompah's did and become outcasts too.
There is possibly somewhat relevance to this theory while not being 100 percent accurate obviously, little differences and such, it still pretty much hits the nail on the head . their is ANOTHER new willy wonka movie coming out called Wonka, i got 2 different trailer ads yesterday on youtube while watching stuff and decided to not click skip cause you could tell right away it was willy wonka so i was curious enough to let it play. in the trailer they show how willy wonka met the Oompahs and on top of that it shows halfway thru that willy wonka and the Oompah's had/have a literal war with the humans/human world/chocolate cartel lol (it shows the oompahs as seemingly tribalistic, living on a secluded island from humans and wielding spears/polearms/axes ready to F**k some S**t up lol and if thats the case then they should have no problem morally, murdering people and children lol) (theres also a couple different violent and dark ass jokes from the oompahs in the two trailers i saw. one of them ends with the main oompah saying hes going to quite viciously stab willy wonka with a cocktail stick lol) the oompahs are def more aggressive/bloodthirsty/capable of heartlessly murdering people and kids than wonka does wonka seems batshit crazy sure but he doesnt put off violent crazy vibes or murderer crazy vibes lol
That’s a good theory
@@majinvegeta420I haven't seen any trailers yet but you just made me want to watch the movie lol. I'll definitely have to check out.
@@Kanojo22 lmfao ill try and do you a solid and search up the ad/trailer that i got/was talking about and post a link in reply
Awesome! I love this theory and can't wait to see Wonka!
Im convinced Mary Poppins is a Time Lord/Lady. She has a bag thats bigger on the inside and she regenerated from Julie Andrews to Emily Blunt.
How do you explain the realms that they visit in the different situations they end up in time lords can’t do that because they are still essentially human I would say something along the lines of either a goddess or an angel
I loved the animated segments of this video, they really illustrated the general idea of the theories
The Harry Potter theory could only have been made by someone who was not paying attention at all.
Harry Potter himself became a horcrux.. Hints why in order for Voldemort to be defeated, Harry had to be defeated as well.. And he did die. He came back because of a specific magical item he had.
Yeah. However, nothing makes sense in the series anyway, for two reasons.
1) The Horcrux in Harry didn’t die in the Chamber of Secrets. (which may be due to the fact (my assumption) that for living Horcruxes, the Horcrux object must die for the Horcrux to get destroyed)
2) They don’t swear enough to be realistic teenagers.
Don't call it ruing you childhood call it improving you childhood instead
That Mary Poppins theory is quite interesting. And leads me to think.. what if there are more characters that do similar things, and could be the same entity? Like rumplestiltskin-esque creatures. I mean, every magic DOES have a price.
Lowest common denominator of 25 and 27 are 675, 1350, 2025... What happens in the year 2025 when IT feeds off of joy AND fear?
.out watch now masochists them after going Pennywise
?guh baxkeards spoke It
They aren't the same being, but they could be the same kind of being but of opposing forces. She would be stronger than he is because fear is short lived, but joy helps you live longer.
It's an intriguing thought about Rumpelstilzchen, perhaps it's not the child he truly wanted but the mother's Despair over her situation. Despair can be as powerful a feeling as Fear or Joy. But if there exists a being that feeds on each of these what other emotions are there beings for? Do fairy Godmothers feed on Hope or Love?
Kid: Dad! Peter Pan is here!
Dad: *Hunting rifle clicks* Where is he?
Peter Pan: Fu-
Lol Peter Pan is a Minnis team hook all day
Yt shorts ahh comment
Personally, I like Jar Jar. The actor who played him wanted to unalive himself after all the hatred the character received.
so much potential wasted I bet, nobody should feel that way, give him some respect.
The thing about the Harry Potter theory is that technically Voldemort did kill Harry but Voldemort himself took most of the killing curse Dumbledore did say that Harry could move on to the afterlife if he wanted.
Well, Voldemort killed the bit of his own soul that was in Harry.
I would call this valid but I don’t trust either of your profile pictures
Jar Jar plot twist would be one of the best in cinematic history. I believe it was the original plan. Too bad Lucas changed it because of the backlash.
I would like to mention that "abrakadabra" means "I create as I speak" in hindi and "I will create the world" in aramaic, so it may not be as dark.
Oh! I never knew that but that begs the question though where did that term come from and why is it seemingly used by magicians or at least people pretending to be magicians
doesnt avada kedavra mean something like "I destroy as i speak"?
Thank you for such amazing videos 😊
As a swiss i can say that i have watched none of these movies as a kid and my childhood is not ruined
Actually the donkey is a fairy tale creature from one of Grimm's fairy tales. The "Gold-Ass" can shit out gold pieces on command. No joke. That's actually in the fairy tale.
Learn something new 😂
"The Golden A$$" you mean, that kinds seems like a more traumatic version of Jack and the beanstalk on the part where a chicken can lie golden eggs tho that appears more natural for the animal, but the donkey one sounds more unnecessarily or ridiculously hilarious 😅
But do any other donkeys in the movie talk? That's bc in Pinocchio, the kids that get transformed can still talk
@@BabySeal84Good point. So maybe donkey is from Pinocchio. That would explain why he is so childish.
@frankbauerful OML I REMEMBER SOMETHING. In the shrek movie where rumplestiltskin is the villain, donkey meets shrek when he's dragging a carriage and getting whipped so he sings different songs. What if those songs that donkey is singing, were played in the carnival where he got transformed
That Mary Poppins/Pennywise theory hits different
The jar-jar theory is actually awesome
Peter Pan theory is great ! love when a plot twist happens like villains are the true heroes
On the Harry Potter one it makes sense if you remember the first brothers and how the third brother escaped death until he meet’s death as a friend
Harry was a descendant of the last of the three brothers. The deathly hallows were actually his. It would make sense the prophecy implied harry could be immortal cos in the original story, the 3rd brother wanted something to escape death. The invisibility cloak. Which harry now has. Death only caught up with the last brother on the choice of the 3rd brother when he took off the cloak (which he gave to his son). Man the Harry potter story is never ending in it's background details
The Mary Poppins/ Pennywise theory is hilarious! As a huge fan of both, it really has me thinking. Great job 😂
I wonder if the creators are referencing Mary as the movie was made? Maybe they were scared of her as a kid for some reason
The challenge that Willy wonka put into place was to find someone who he could trust to leave his chocolate factory to because he knew he wouldn’t live forever he was looking for someone who wasn’t greedy and would do the right thing
There is a sequel to Home Alone I forget the name but it shows that Kevin goes on to have his own security company while his brother becomes a police officer
Home sweet home alone is the movie you're talking about
Btw there's home alone 2, 3, 4, 5
I'm too lazy to check the comments if someone else mentioned this already,but the scene where jar jar accusedly uses the jedi-mind trick, it's against a creature we just established being immune to Jedi mind tricks :D
The mary poppins and pennywise theory should be made canon and a VS movie should be made.
The original idea was very simple, though. The concept of a "good witch" is something that exists in European folklore as well. Most of these theories are laughably bad, but people keep trying like a high school English teacher to find symbolism in the oddest places.
I won't lie, I can totally see this somewhat canon as well! Though I don't think I've seen either one (I've definitely never watched IT because I'm a huge coward), but with all the listed similarities between the two, I wanna see this as a canon just for fun. :P
I had heard most of these before but some of them caught me completely off guard! The Mary Poppins maybe being Pennywise & their similarities in general are interesting to consider. The Harry Potter theories were also very interesting to think about. Very interesting compilation of movie theories!
Funnily enough, thanks to "The Dark Tower" bookseries we know that Pennywise belongs to a species called "emotional vampires" and that they are a rather rare sight, since there's almost none in the multiverse, at some point in The Dark Tower our protagonist meet 2 emotional vampires, one who feeds of the admiration of the people (becoming something akin to a rockstar) while the other feed of sadness (I'm pretty sure the Gunslinger kills this one), this means that each emotional vampire feeds of a different emotion and that not all of them are bad or dangerous.
So Mary Poppins could very well be the same species as Pennywise
@@hasturthekinginyellow5003 Have never heard of this book series but I am intrigued. & will definitely look more into it. Thank you for the information & topic insight!
@@hasturthekinginyellow5003 Just out of curiosity, do the emotional vampires leave their victims feeling weak or emotionless after the EV's feed on the victims' emotions?
@@lyndseystrait1513 for what we can see, no
@@hasturthekinginyellow5003 Interesting. ok good to know. I am definitely reading that series you recommended. Thank you.
The Harry Potter franchise is still yet to be uncovered 😊
Jar jar binks theory actually makes things make sense!! This explains his character so well that id say it improves the movie for me honestly.
be amazed is the new film theory confirmed
this got a little more likes than i anticipated, thanks, i guess.
You know film theory too
Yessss
Yup
This is the third comment before it gets popular
And this is the fourth
Film theory is the best theorist on UA-cam
Wait this would ruin entire life because I'm still a child 10 years old
I love these illustrations that goes with what he’s saying.
I did not realize that Pennywise and Mary Poppins had the same things in common mind blown!!
Jar Jar's being a Sith Lord would've been super interesting after the Clone Wars animated series, since he has to pose as various entities against the Seperatists (of whom were entrusting Palpatine with security and peace after the war was over). I wanna say he once posed as a Gungan king, and in another, he was posing as something else? Of course, these were to help the Republic / Jedi, but still...Imagine him acting like a clumsy idiot, only to really be super powerful (gah, imagine him at Yoda stage!!) Sith who was actually backstabbing BOTH sides under Palpatine's control simply by posing as an ally...
Though I wonder how he'd talk once he'd show his true motifs...Would he still speak like he normally did, or would he switch to "NOW YOU WILL DIE, FOOLISH ONES!" instead? Can't imagine a Sith Lord being like "Yousa gotta go now, okie-day?" and stabbing someone. xD
In the original treatment he was actually going to be a back stabbing mercenary that betrays Qui-gon
After Charlie took over Wonka's factory, he than made the forever train (Snow Piercer).
The kevin macalester being saw blew my mind so much my face was like this 😮
0:35 the emperor’s new groove
1:55 Star Wars episode 1-3
4:37 Harry Potter
5:52 shrek
7:23 cars
8:35 Mary Poppins
10:18 monsters inc
11:54 Peter Pan
14:12 how the grinch stole Christmas
15:51 Harry Potter again
17:27 home alone
19:37 another shrek
21:06 Willy wonka
Thank you for making this.
thank you 😀
Thank hyou😊
Movies traumatized me as a kid. I've never got over watching Bambi aged 7 (back in the '70s). When his mother got shot, I was really upset. It didn't help that I'd not gone to see it with my family, but a friend of my dad's with his daughter of the same age. I couldn't really turn to him for comfort!
Walt Disney was a twisted "bar steward."
Amazing fanarts for each case!
My favorite movie is the emperor's new groove, and I still love it.
The Harry Potter theory does kinda make sense in some ways. Though, the phrase “must die at the hand of the other”, can be interpreted very vaguely. I like to think it as, “Harry Potter can only kill Voldemort”, and vice versa.
Edit: Also, another explanation for the Monsters Inc. theory, scarlet fever is spread similarly; touch, and through contaminated objects. So, perhaps the first encounter between humans and monsters happened to cause scarlet fever to spread.
Edit 2: I’d also like to mention that John Kramer and Kevin have similar looks. Blonde hair, blue eyes, face shape, etc.
I’m pretty sure Prophecies aren’t actually that accurate so Harry is probably not immortal after Voldemort was killed because he’s no longer a horcrux
@@Cat-pv6yx Exactly - the issue was that as long as a part of one was inside the other, it effectively meant immortality for both. And since Harry had to essentially kill the thing/purge it inside him, it makes sense as well. Once they were all destroyed, well, he's just a very old man anyone could kill.
@@Cat-pv6yx The only way for Harry to become immortal is upon possessing all the three Deathly Hallows - the Elder Wand, Resurrection Stone, and Cloak of Invisibility. Be Amazed made a mistake about the phrase in the Prophecy.
@rogueascendant6611
That’s a misread on your part, being “master of death” by wielding the three hallows doesn’t make you immortal
If it does, then it isn’t mentioned anywhere in the books
Avada Kedavra translates from Aramaic to "Let the thing be destroyed" or "With my words I bring destruction"
Similarly, Abra Cadabra, from the same Aramaic, translates to “Let the thing be created”, or “With my words, I create.”
the next home alone movie mentions him being the owner of a home security company
Wanted to watch this earlier but didn't have time. But I'm here now mate!
Peter Pan is the villain was my childhood theory and other kids didn't believe me 😅
There is also the theory that Avada Kedavra, Crucio and Imperio were all created by the Peveral Brothers. The original owners of the Deathly Hallows.
I wonder, did the horcruxes KEEP Harry alive as much as they did You-know-Who? (Harry potter) Neither can live while the other survives.
The prophecy in Harry Potter got me thinking about it after saying he would be immortal. In the 7th book he is reveled as the Master of Death. Not saying he is immortal, but maybe a little foreshadowing going on
These aren't anything I haven't heard before but great video. I love my childhood memories of the movies and shows.
"I think we can all use a little more than a spoon full of sugar to help this theory go down." Me: I agree. That theory is a little hard to swallow.
whoa i was stun of peter pan you are right I've never thought of it , Hook isn't evil at all , peter pan's idea was to keep also Wendy and the other two boys but he let them to leave cause he loved Wendy, I understood when the mermaids were jealous of Wendy for her beauty in the end JUSTICE FORCAPTAIN HOOK !
Personally, I don't think the kid from home alone. Would some day be a maniac in the future, but not the type of person you would want to trifle with if you ever messed with his family or him?
Another poppins theory is shes from the potter world during the first Wizarding war and voldemort killed her
Plus in the book of willy wonka it shows all the kids alive and as better people so he wasnt lying in the movie
Exactly
My brother in law looks just like Willie Wonka and i just now realized it. I sent him a picture a few minutes ago and said "I didnt know that you were in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" lol 😂
VERY EDUCATIONAL
I like to think JarJar’s arm movement when Sebulba is attacking him could be explained as him trying to mimic the Jedi and try to use the Force to defend himself or it could be an attempt to pull his arm free.
Gene wilder was one of the best actors ever his portrayal of Willy wonka was amazing he was perfect for the role
Out of all of the theories in this video, the Donkey one is the only one that holds real weight. Yet Be Anazed thinks its a stretch lmao 😂
Most of the rest are laughably bad or simply wrong, but this one I immediately recognized when I saw the movie. The oddly "human" donkey.. not a lot of fairy tales that that is possible to be, really. And Disney/Pixar loves thinking exactly like this, with everything in those movies' being a nod or link to some character or story.
Oh - the two that he got actually wrong were the Fly (( reference to the old 50s sci-fi movie ) and abracadabra. It's a very old mix of Aramaic and Arabic that first appeared in stories about magic (the famous 10001 tales) Roughly it translates into "As I said/say, so shall it be created/done" in a compressed acronym of the first syllables of the words. This is not hard to find online, either. And it makes perfect sense as well as to the original audience they would have figured out the meaning almost instantly and connected it to the genre/type of character. To Western ears it sounds odd, but 1000 years ago, perfectly normal, like how we see "WYSIWYG" and immediately say the words in out heads.
Well the hook one is pretty legit I believe. I think that was the underlying inference in the story. As I read it anyway.
@AnothaGuy87 Yes, I agree. I also believe the emperors new groove one as well. I was just baffled by the proposition that out of all the theories he is spewing, that one was far-fetched to him. lmao
Also in home alone, yes. The criminals got a lot of torment from a young boy, but they could have avoided all of that, by changing their names, ideas, or just leaving to another country, province or so forth
I remember this show on Netflix called "once upon a time" it was basically a darker and grown up version of how the stories goes or what happened after the stories. I never really watched it because I couldn't care for it
There was a show like that on ABC I think that's what you mean
@@homelesshannah50 could be
Be Amazed is simply Amazing 👍💯
Love your video Be Amazed and keep up the great work
Zootopia's no Humans theories are right up the with the most disturbing and horrifying theories that will ruined your childhood.
I love the Harry Potter art style
They should make a Star Wars: What If... and show what would have happened if Jar Jar had been a Sith Lord
Pinocchio
No thank you. They should honestly do a what if version of the whole prequel trilogy without Jar Jat so it might be palatable.
@@paulrichards2544 You don't ave to watch it.
Lots of potential, good and bad.
Star Wars: What if...
*Luke loved moisture farming.
*Luke missed his shot at the death star, creating an atheistic zeal for anything 'the force'. (And entered into intense therapy for his old man hallucinations)
*Amidala (sp?) was corrupted by power
*It wasn't a trap?
*R2D2 was a sadist, oh wait- pretty sure that one's real.
I could go on for days.
You forgot to mention the comic that showed us how effective Jar Jar really is and how he fakes his clumsiness is.
15:13 actually in the original(4d) movie he was actually the only Grinch and was bullied by his hairy look until he decided to shave him self witch made him uglier then he fled to the mountain that was his home
Oh now love Christmas to the bone
And in Willy Wonka not only did the boat only have room for the survivors after the gluup incident but, by the time they got to the "Hsawaknow" it only had seating for four plus wonka himself. This proves he knew how many kids he was going to lose by then as well. If you ask me they shouldn't have even survived the remedies. The Taffy pulling room (otherwise known as) "the rack". (The juice squeezing room) which is probably "the iron maiden." As well as the garbage chute. Some would probably refer to that as the fiery furnace. Yes Willy Wonka was a lovable homicidal maniac. But didn't you just love his hat?
hsawaknow what is that japanese?
There's also another movie about the story of Peter and Hook. Although in that one they show that hook and pan started out on more friendly terms.
The saw one is false because in the newest home alone installation, Kevin owns his own security company.
8:04 actually yes in a Mater’s tall tales that deals with time travel mater encounters stone wheels that are the car equivalent to cave people
I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS AND YOUR CHANNEL YOUR AMAZING ☺️
Harry could just trip and die from Voldemort’s diary or something, therefore basically being killed by part of Voldemort.
The Harry celebating part is just 👌
And being the foster daughter of Bellatrix, Lestrange, Crucio is another one of my favorites, besides the lucky charm, because that spell is very useful Alohomora
With Harry Potter, there are some stories that make him immortal because by mastering all the Deathly Hallows he became the master of death.
I was said in the latest Home Alone movie, Kevin went into the home security business. (Wasn't a good movie, but its facts)
I agree, it sucked.
I'm sure there was a story about a talking donkey. I used to have the book can't remember what it's called.
As a Harry Potter fan I can assure you that Harry potter’s infinite misery will never come. He is always in trouble voldemort or not .
I 100% believe the Star Wars one, and it would have been one of the greatest things to ever happen on film if Lucas had gone through with it.
I actually thought that Mary Poppins might indeed be some sort of elderich being, albeit a benevolent one. (I mean, just because it's old and supernatural doesn't mean it has to be out to torture or kill people.) That or a form of fae. The same with the grandmother in "The Princess and the Goblin".
The harry Potter immortal one is largely answered in the books
Donkey is a harder sell, they try to prevent any leaving who "can still talk" so donkey would have had to have hidden that fact when leaving
That’s riiiiiight I remember that from the Disney version of Pinocchio
Or donkey could’ve just waited until nightfall and then sneaked out that’s a possibility as well
7:00 I mean when I first heard of shrek having a talking donkey, I just assumed it was just some pinnochio thing I never knew it was less canon and more fanon
My take on Cars franchisee. It's an immersive video game played by the residents of Axiom( wall-e) which is why there is an earth-type world and all cars are human playable characters. a GTA open word type game.
If you think it,how did Cronk not get made a fly by those annoyings of him to Yzma.
Charlie, who inherited Wonka's factory, grew up to be the tyrant conductor and administrator on the Snow Piercer.
I think that instead of monster inc finding humans in the 1300s they actually found them in the age of the plague of Justinian basically the first black plague then came back during the famous times of the black plague then again tried during the plague of Marseille then tried again again during the Spanish flu then came back without a plague two generations before sully and Mikes adventures
I always thought captain hook being the villain was ridiculous. welp, guess I was right
Remember Jar Jar is met in the Gungan city with fear. Fear that does not actually match with the reasons given for why he is not in the city. Donkey does also at me point in a single blink and you miss it throw away line mention how you get used to being changed eventually.
I will never look at some of these movies the same!
Lol I likeee the home alone SAW theory!!✨