I just bought a Dr. Pepper and holy crap! I was blown away but please don’t make me pick between this and CW as I am a huge fan. This watch was my first GMT but it was pretty simple setting it up. At 40mm case and 13.2 thick it’s got great dimensions. I would have preferred Swiss movement but the movement on this watch is way above average. At this price point this watch is a huge, HUGE value and when you add in the creative Dr. Pepper design, the Jubilee style bracelet with killer micro adjust, awesome color, and smokin hot look, I’m an instant fan. My next JM will be the Canton. Thanks for a great review!
The new Dr. Pepper looks awesome. If I didn't already have the original I'd order it. And even then I'm still tempted. 😂 But as it is, it's my favorite GMT.
You hit the nail on the head I just bought an amazing used Tudor 1926 for 1200. I’ve always been a fan of Jack Mason but this watch is just a little out of the price point. Should be more around 1299, I also wish it would have stayed American made. 😢
Very exciting release! Great combination of looks, case and movement. With regards to the Omega aqua terra - to me the only model on the market that I consider to be a valid alternative to the aqua terra is the fears redcliff with an open case back but it is twice the price of the watch we discuss here. This Canton doesn't cut it to compete with the aqua terra but it competes with many watches in its price rangee. For example, it competes with the new Longines conquest 38mm and has few advantages over it like the 20mm lug width, no crown guards, the color matching date wheel on the green dial and the clasp. This watch also challenges monta noble and many other models! As a whole in its category I find it an impressive effort!
Reminds me the most of the Tissot Gentlemen or the Henry Archer Vesterhav, would be interested to see a comparison to those too. I prefer both of those, and they cost a lot less. This really meeda a distinct 12 oclock marker too. Imo going swiss made is a mistake, and thats as a non american
It looks like a nice watch and has solid specs, but tbh the watch doesn’t move me to want one. I guess we’re spoiled where an all around good watch isn’t enough of a reason to buy it. Solid review as always.
It's not just you. I don't mind the price. I don't mind the Swiss movement. I do mind the "Swiss Made". I wanted a Jack Mason, because I wanted a Texas watch. If I want a Swiss watch, I'll get a Swiss watch. There are Swiss watches I love.
Yep, I'm down for Sellita or some other Swiss movement to justify the price a bit, but build them in TX and lean harder into "Texas Made" because that's a better differentiator in a crowded field of micro/upstart brands.
@@gnarl12 I don't think the "scale" these guys are pushing out is enough of an issue for them right now that this is a legitimate problem. And the "watchmaking" in question would just be assembly of prefab parts, to run the size of factory they'd need at this level it would probably only take 2-3 actual watchmakers for QC and then a handful of workers who are trained in specific assembly line tasks.
Hi Shane, As I watch your video I'm wearing my Erebus Ascent and have a hard justifying the price tag. In my opinion Jodi is shaking up the micro brand industry with great watches at a reasonable prices with a great movement
Between him and Marc, it's a different world in that price range. Which I think is partly why Jack Mason is doing this. Going up in quality/price means less competition for them in that price range.
In the 2nd part I'll be comparing it to my 39mm Sealander GMT. Be better to compare it to the non, but I have the GMT version and always better to compare things I have in hand.
Really looking forward to the comparison video. I live in St. Louis and have seen Monta and thought very impressive. I’m just trying to decide if I really want 38.5mm watch on 8” wrist. I already have a 38mm Khaki Field & like it but long lug to lug.
I have been interested in Jack Mason for a while but have just fallen short of buying one. I was sad to see the Hydrotimer discontinued so soon and am still on the fence about a Strato. This was a good review and I look forward to the follow up.
Hydro-timer is a great watch, but I don't think it sold too well for them. Which is ironic, they made it because a lot of people wanted a non-gmt strat-o-timer, but they didn't buy it as much. Meanwhile, the strat-o-timer is doing really well for them.
It looks too much like other watches that I've seen. You mentioned Christopher Ward. I like the Sealander 36mm because it seems like a natural extension of their design language and it knows what it is trying to be, or maybe even what it is trying to be a well-made alternative to. But another one I think I would choose is the Ocean To Orbit Lhotse. Those guys are brand spanking new but the they're focusing on the tool aspect with a few details that the Canton is missing. That and OTO sent the watch up the mountain it is named after to establish some of its adventure cred. If the Canton wants to be the Texas Aqua-Terra it needs a little more flair that is uniquely Texan. At the very least assemble it in the U.S. (Just an opinion)
One, I love the Public Market Center in Anchorage. Two I think the watch will do well (granted the dust isn’t there). Three I think if they sold it as a “Texas Aqua Terra” by building it in the U.S., and pricing it at around $800 to $900, it may have done better. Anyway. Thanks for the great review and looking forward to the comparison. You should have worn a crazy curly hair wig when talking about what the wife said. 😆
As a newer person in the hobby, I've been going back and forth on how important heritage can be as well as the subtle design choices as something that can really affect your experience with a watch. It's hard for me to separate the difference between a watch like this one that takes design cues that theoretically stand on its own as a piece worth having vs a chinese clomage with good specs. As a student, the >1k price difference isn't even something I can quite comprehend and it's getting too close to C tier grail options like the cheapest used GS to seem like it would make sense in my situation. Would love to hear your thoughts on the citizen zenshin line!
Well, History and Heritage is a tricky thing... In some ways, it matters a lot, and in other ways it's just talk and hype. For instance, it's something that can vary between people and is un-quantifiable, so it's impossible to evaluate in terms of value. Yet at the same time, once you get over a certain price point, value pretty much goes out the window anyway. The differences in quality get so minute, it's splitting hairs. So at that point, it's really what catches your attention and heart. Although as a student, I'd recommend staying on the affordable side of things anyway. You got more important things to spend your money on. So I'd say get a good San Martin watch and maybe look at something like a Casio Oceanus. Amazing watches with quality you wouldn't expect. As for the Zenshin... Not a fan of the case, but the dials look great. Need to see one in person though.
@RelativeTime Very true, it's up to each individual how much emphasis they want to put in heritage. It would make sense that a newer enthusiast like me is focused on value for money, specs, and design. It seems maturing in the hobby shifts the view away from the material aspect and becomes more about supporting a brand, appreciating and sharing the story behind it, and adopting some of those brand values into your own identity.
@@t1n670 for some maybe. For me, it's been more about finding interesting watches from a variety of brands. Watches that I connect with for some reason or another.
Farer doing LPJ three hand watches for $500 less. I usually don’t like those kind of comps but it’s not an insignificant amount and Farer quality and design is quite good in that price range. Edit: Farer with bracelet is $350 less expensive.
I need to give Farer another shot. I do have a slightly older model, but wasn't overly impressed by the quality. It wasn't bad... but that one seemed ok for the price. Compared to that one, CW and Monta were better, with this one somewhere between those two.
@@RelativeTime Which Farer do you have? I’ve been to a couple of WindUp watch fairs and the Farers stood out in a good way. Especially their cushion cases and their three-handers. They do have a couple of divers/chronos where I feel they went overboard with the colors and they look kind of cheap.
@@dparis2172 It's a Pembroke... I think it came out 3 years ago. Bought it used from a friend. Sort of their answer to an Oris Big Date Pointer. It's good, colorful, and vibrant. but the finish didn't wow me like CW or Monta has.
Coffin shaped indices! It looks good to a degree but it's a tricky price point IMO to succeed at as the options widen with some quality options. I think I'd lean more towards Formex or Monta as they have their own X factor, love or hate. Rolex, TAG and home grown CW are a bit too generic for me regarding indices. I like the CW and Omega case and hands but the Mason waffle dial looks great. Polished centre link is a bit too blingy for my British reserve :)
They are sort of coffin, I think the wings slope back down, and disapear into the dial. At least with the black one. So you only catch a glint of it as the light hits the side. most of the time you just see the brushed square part. I think CW has some great case designs, but sometimes their dials can be a little boring.
Looks great, but is it enough to set itself apart from Formex, Monta, CW, Tissot Gentleman, Longines Conquest, or Traska on the lower $ end. Looking forward to Part 2 of this discussion!
That is the question. From a design perspective... not really, but a lot of those watches tend to blend together as well. What they are banking on is the quality helping to set them apart and gaining value that way. Like trying to have Monta level while undercutting them by a few hundred dollars. But at the same time, at a certain price point value kind of goes out the window anyway. Like over a 1k or 1.5k, you are really splitting hairs over the quality differences. At that point, it's more about what speaks to you.
No it doesn't do enough. Putting a high end swiss movement just to charge a ridiculous amount of money, isn't it. This watch is over priced by several hundred, for a place design. Build quality..ok fine but so does CW and countless other micros...this is a fashion brand who is trying to go upscale and is failing in my opinion. They are trying to charge luxury prices for a non luxury watch.
@@RelativeTimeforgot to mention the Citizen Chronomaster, which is similar price new on EBay. Like you, I own one and can vouch that it edges out all I’d listed! Also honorable mention for affordable option is Erebus Ascent.
It's a nice-looking watch, but i think the textured dial is the best part of it. Kudos to Jack Mason for the hardness coating. The polished center link bracelet is just too much for my taste. I think the only way to get away with polished center links is with jubilee style that subdues the polished section. I still prefer my Monta Noble. Love my Strat-O-Timer though! Is the bracelet made with fully articulating separate links? I couldn't tell for sure but would expect that.
Nice review and nice looking watch! I do feel like it’s a bit over priced, but maybe not for some of it speaks to them. Check out the new Squale Montauk on Long Island watch! Would love to see you review it.
@@RelativeTime I have the venturer. Had it for about 10 months, after overcoming a small niggle which was resolved under warranty I have not worn any of my Rolex’s since the watch was returned to me. The commuter is too plain for me but looks like a great GADA and a good alternative to the JM for a lower budget.
Still eyeing the Canton, probably in the steel blue, but being Dallas resident I'll go see it first. I would love to know what strap that is at 14:22. Thanks!
I'll have to get back to you in the strap. I'm out of town for the next few days and don't remember where I got that one. I'll have to double check it when I get back home.
Now I haven't seen it, so I can't comment on the quality differences. But one thing to point out is that the movement itself is about $300 if you were to buy one. 3x more than a 9015.
It's a lovely watch, but I would say $1000 is about right. Other than the slightly better movement it's not really any better than the Astor+Banks fortitude, but more than twice the price
For me the issue of this watch is that at this price, it effectively is only likely to appeal because of the brand itself and its origin, albeit oddly downplayed by trading USA assembly for Swiss Made. Outside of that, I see this watch as probably quite good, but ultimately unexciting. The Ellum also seemed too expensive, but did generate intrigue.
Even taking your (entirely reasonable) focus on the tangibles into account, and not worrying about brand equity, I don't think that's a $1,500 watch. When you think about what you can buy, from microbrands or heavyweights - so again not worrying about the brand - for similar money, it's a bit overpriced for me.
I been on a quest to collect US made watches, I live in Texas. Jack Mason, Trafford watch, Dufrane watch, Roysdon watch, etc.. This watch reminds me of the Tissot PRX Waffle dial pattern, but allot cheaper. Does it cost more because it Swiss Made Vs US made?
Well it's an American brand, and in the past some of their watches are "American Assembled" Can't say Made for legal reasons. But this one is Swiss made as is the PRX.
Should have kept it assembled in the US. That labels means something unlike “Swiss Made”. So many people aren’t aware of how little has to be Swiss to legally use that label. There’s a reason I buy everything that Vaer releases where assembly or parts are made in the US. I will support that cause even if I don’t like the watch that much.
I bought a JM watch but I don't trust the brand yet. They don't have anything in stock half the tims. Coup is years ago a famous watch person told me be careful about small brands not having stock.it's a red flag. But I do love my JM watch.
I've been on the fence about this one for a while - still am. At this price point the Canton is squarely in the cross hairs of the likes of the Monta Noble, Farer Three Handers and of course , the Formex Essence 39 , the last of which I feel is probably the closest in terms of the best AT alternative from an indie / microbrand . The only thing really going for it (for me at least) is that seemingly awesome movement. Though as a potential one piece collection / GADA , do you really need a 68 hour power reserve ? That said, great review - I'm loving your collection ! Am also a huge fan of Citizen's HAQ Chronomaster series.
The other thing is the scratch-resistant coating. A lot of brands have started using it, but not in this price range. Something I wish Monta was using, and Formex. Just bought a Formex Baby Reef, it's the one thing it's missing.
I think Traska, Heron and Zelos do have that, though you could argue none are priced and spec'd to play in the same range as the above. I owned the Reef GMT briefly and put it through its paces - I think Formex's primarily brushed finish on all its watch cases and bracelets do somewhat alleviate the appearance of scratching, though I agree - it would certainly be nice to see.
@@ImWriteOnTime Agreed... the more brushed the less it matters. Although even then, when I got my Monta Triumph, it's brushed bezel had a nice nick on it. (got it used). I was just thinking that most brands above $1000 don't seem to offer it. Except for ironically Seiko & Citizen.
I saw this and immediately thought it was an Erebuus Ascent. This is becoming a very diluted design between the luxury, mico and factory brands. The movement sets it apart, but for the look there is becoming way more options that are sub $500.
Kinda thought there identity was Texas? After all looks like they have the Texas star as a logo. Is moving everything to Switzerland losing their identity?
They are, and they are still based on DFW. But that is kind of the question moving to Swiss manufacturing. I think it does a bit, but at the same time people still think of cw as British and Monta as an American brand even though They do the same. So I don't know.
I know nothing about this brand but moving upmarket into a segment dominated by Farer, Formex, Christopher Ward, Monta, etc will be challenging against well entrenched brands with broad recognition. It almost feels like it’s out of desperation…
I like it, though I would've preferred a no-date variant if it meant slightly less expensive. The lumed seconds hand is an advantage over the Noble's non-lumed seconds hand IMO. However, I'm not a fan of the inconsistent clustered text at the bottom. The italicized "Canton" text looks rather cartoonish and doesn't blend well with the rest of the text. The 12 o-clock index also needs to look a little different for orientation distinction in low light even though there's a partial index by the date window. I normally don't buy first versions of anything anymore because of potential improvements in the future, so I hope this model stays in the line up. Hopefully, with a no-date variant even if it's just one color.
I can't help but compare this to the original Zelos Spearfish - same movement, hardness coating (albeit a diver, not GADA watch, and not being Swiss Made), selling for half the price.
The case finishing is about on the same level as the Noble. Same with the bracelet. As for the dial, I need to really look at the macro shots a bit more before doing the part 2 video, but right now I'd say they are pretty close. At least ignoring the dust on the prototype... which hopefully doesn't make it into production. Now I think the Noble does have a slightly more refined design. Like on the Noble I love the slight chamfer on the inside of the lugs that leads to the chamfer on the bracelet. There are a few things like that. Whereas I think the Canton has a slight advantage with the scratch-resistant coating and a better clasp. Or.. maybe not a better clasp, but I think it's more comfortable and easier to get on and off. Monta's clasp has a really nice refined look, but JM is more functional. Also has a little better lume, but not by much.
I'd take the Citizen over this, any day. Cause looks better and it's solar. Although date is meh, and so is the bracelet, i guess. As for this, i'd say time isn't exactly right (as you mention too). As long there is a strong market, States mainly, maybe. But doubt. Thanks for the review Shane, be well mate.
The Citizen is amazing... I need to get a video done of that one. But techinicly it's about a grand more then the Jack Mason. So it is a bit more. Luckily I got that one used for a lot less.
@@Ingeborga_Dapkunaite from what I remember, people were asking for a non-Gmt version, and this is the answer they came up with. Same case, same bracelet. But they wanted to make the design different to not overlap. Which evidently didn't give the people what they're wanting.
@@RelativeTime I want a cool white dial watch)) but not Seiko or Citizen(I got too many). CW is cool but way too expensive. Rze endeavour, Scurfa Treasure Seeker are my options. Can you suggest something else?
@@Ingeborga_Dapkunaite did you look at Jody's last watch? Can't remember if he had a white dial. Marc may have some interesting white dial Islanders... But he's got so many models it's hard to remember them all.
Where are you finding Grand Seiko's new for $1500? If so,.that's a pretty good deal. Although I really wish they would add a scratch resistant coating to their steel models. Their polish is amazing, but scratches if you look at it funny.
The price really saddens me. I wonder if us Texans get a friends and family discount. I really wanna support this brand, but I’m a musician… not a Texas oil tycoon
Yeah, Jack Mason is trying to go a little more upscale. There is a lot of competition, and they are thinking this is a way to help them stand out. Another good Texas brand is Dufrane watches. They are based out of Austin. I haven't seen one myself yet but heard good things. www.dufranewatches.com/ Speaking of Austin. Jack Mason and a few other brands are doing a watch show there next Saturday (18th). If you want to see some in person it's a good way. www.intersectwatchshow.com/austin
Not gonna lie.. this looks like a $300 Erebus watch. Case and dial looks very generic. Would be hard pressed to choose this over other brands like Sinn, C Ward, Monta, Formex, etc.
Since you mentioned Sinn, I'll just throw this out here as it's something I've been thinking about... A few months ago got a 556A. Always wanted one, and found a good deal on a used one on eBay. One with the red Second hand. So technically it's 556 A RS. Anyway. I was getting some shots of it at the same time as this. It's a modern classic, but it's not a very complex design. Simple brushed case, printed dial, flat hands, bad lume. I'm still happy with what I paid for it, but having a hard time with it having an MSRP of $1,800. That said, also got a Formex Baby Reef a few days ago. Highly impressive.
@@RelativeTime I've had 2 556's. The aRS and the original i and I agree with your assessment. I much preferred the 556i and it's gloss black dial. The simplicity of that design has charm. But yes, not worth the 1800 USD pricetag. at $1200 or so, its good. Out of those brands I mentioned, I did find the Formex to be the most well build and luxurious feel to it. Such a great company. The only knock I have against it is the name sounds like a cleaning agent lol. Great reviews btw, love your style.
@@Mackster248 100 percent agree on the name. Really like how innovative they are too. Like the bezel changes and quick release clasp. Been wanting to check them out for a while and fell in love with the new bronze dial 39.5mm one. Never seen anything quite like it.
@@RelativeTime the bronze 39mm is the one to get! I’ve been waiting for that to go on sale over at Reddits watch sub. Hoping to grab it one day. Looking forward to your review on it!
@@RelativeTimeSinn stopped being a good value proposition when the prices increased above $1200. Even $1200 was a stretch as they’re just a tool watch. And one w/ outer AR coating that can and will come off over time making it look bad.
Looks very similar to the Erebus Accent, which is only $499. If they were both $499, I’d still choose the Erebus. This would be a nice watch at $499, maybe up to $750, but not past that. At $800 I’d rather have a Tissot Gentleman or Tissot PRX. At $1,500… this is a joke.
I feel like “Swiss Made” watch doesn’t mean what it once did in the late 80’s - early 00’s. And so the gad with lot cheaper Chinese watches keeps closing as time goes by.
Hey Shane, usually I'm on the same page with you when talking watches. But here I have to disagree wholeheartedly. History/heritage are extremely important for me when I evaluate the value of a watch. Is it all storytelling in the end? Yes. But imagine the US without the myth of the American Dream. The country maybe wouldn't even exist anymore. It is so important to identify - with a country, religion, idea or just a product. Since micros don't have that, they have to adapt by finding the original design, the great specs for the money or the new story that people can relate to. You said it yourself. JM had a real Texas thing going and now, with all the going upmarket is the only way, they've given up on that and are just one of a million non Swiss swiss made. I'm not a fan. Cheers
Well, history and heritage is important. I wasn't trying to imply that. It's partly why some people love certain watches, like the Speedmaster. But when doing a review and talking value, that's something that's impossible to quantify (everyone likes different brands differently) and not necessarily fair to bring into the equation. That's what I was trying to say. So I try to look at things objectively regardless of who making it, and when talking value the only way to do that is to look at the specifics. The tangible things you're getting for the money. Now when you, the individual, are buying something. That's a whole other story, at that point sometimes you have to go with your heart. And realistically, once you get above a certain price point value goes out the window anyway. It's more about what you want, then what's a good deal.
Now I've looked at plenty of San Martin watches, and even their new brand (whatever it's called, can't remeber). They are some of the best bang for your buck around. So I can say that from a quality stand point.. the fit and finish, movement, bracelet, all that stuff. It's no contest. However... sometimes we do need to ask ourselves how good of a watch do we actually need? That I think is the trick with watch collecting these days. Because oftentimes the improvements are things that you don't really notice or really need.
Pricing and branding confuse me. Jack Mason (in my mind) is Texas pride as evidenced by their Dr. Pepper release last year. I thought they were living the "F-you, I am from Texas" motto and ethos which I love! But this watch is Swiss made? And for the pricing, Formex and CW give you a lot more watch for your dollar at the $1500 price point - especially Formex. I also think the design is similar to the Henry Archer Vesterhav except the Vesterhav is 1/3 the price. SMH
Had a random idea. They recently did a special blacked-out gmt with the Anti Watch Club. What would you think if they did a "Screw You, We're From Texas" special edition of one of their watches? Not sure what it would look like, but something distinctly Texas. Maybe make the dial a giant Texas Rangers badge, put "Screw You" on the rotor, and on the clasp change the "Be Your Best" text to "We're from Texas". Then either only sell it in person at a Texas Event, or only ship to Texas zip codes. I might suggest it to them.
You have a beautiful mind! Watch should lean into the Texas thing as they go upmarket- not go Swiss! Bonus points if the watch comes with collectible belt buckle!
I see nothing in this watch that isn't done better by the Erebus Ascent, for a fraction of the price. Even the vaunted "Swiss movement" is essentially the same as a 9015 other than the power reserve, which is only useful if you really are wearing this after a weekend. Tacky polished midlinks should be illegal.
Just bought a Formex Baby Reef, highly impressed with it. I've never seen the Essence, but if I were to guess on its quality from the other one. I'd say this Jack Mason would sit halfway between Fromex and CW.
As much as I hate to admit it, Rolex came up with designs that were pretty much perfect. Case in point the Subby and the OP. This is a well executed variation of an OP.
Looks like a Henry Archer with a different bezel. "Swiss Made" to raise prices is lame. Won't consider the watch because of the lame marketing gimmick...
Baltic Cw Formex Monta Even traska and some san martins have better models than this fir less. The ONLY reason to get this, is if all you care about is the movement, which really isnt much better then sw200 or eta and thise can be found for less and the japan highbeat movements, are on par lets be honest. I think they are trying to go up in price too fast and its making them look bad. Just no reason to pay this amount for this watch with so much competition thats are the same and in a lot of cases, better. Like is this watch 4 times better then Jodi's new gada watches...no lol
I'd say the G100 is more equivalent to a SW300 than a SW200. Price wise it sits between the two as well. If you wanted one I think it's about $300 by itself.
@@RelativeTime I know. I’m weird like that. The idea of unscrewing a crown just to wind a watch, let alone adjust the time bothers me. I love my sarb033 in part because I can just pick it up and wind away. No extra point of failure to worry about. My Oris pointer date, with only 50m of water resistance and a screw down crown is a different story. I love that watch too - probably more than the sarb if I didn’t have to fiddle with the crown all the time and worry about stripping it. I’ve owned several watches with 100m water resistance and a push crown and never had a problem with water - even after rafting and tubing. I’m okay with them on divers but they are just impractical for 99% of my use cases.
@@dparis2172 I can understand that. People seem to insist on them, but I don't think it helps WR much. I've always heard it's more to stop it from accidentally popping out underwater. Most of the WR is in the rubber seals.
I love the wrist shots at 4:52 . I was in Ketchikan Alaska, and the bird flew in at the perfect time as I was tilting the camera up.
I'm always impressed when a manufacturer upgrades the movement. This looks awesome. Cheers.
I just bought a Dr. Pepper and holy crap! I was blown away but please don’t make me pick between this and CW as I am a huge fan. This watch was my first GMT but it was pretty simple setting it up. At 40mm case and 13.2 thick it’s got great dimensions. I would have preferred Swiss movement but the movement on this watch is way above average. At this price point this watch is a huge, HUGE value and when you add in the creative Dr. Pepper design, the Jubilee style bracelet with killer micro adjust, awesome color, and smokin hot look, I’m an instant fan. My next JM will be the Canton. Thanks for a great review!
The new Dr. Pepper looks awesome. If I didn't already have the original I'd order it. And even then I'm still tempted. 😂
But as it is, it's my favorite GMT.
You hit the nail on the head I just bought an amazing used Tudor 1926 for 1200. I’ve always been a fan of Jack Mason but this watch is just a little out of the price point. Should be more around 1299, I also wish it would have stayed American made. 😢
Very exciting release! Great combination of looks, case and movement.
With regards to the Omega aqua terra - to me the only model on the market that I consider to be a valid alternative to the aqua terra is the fears redcliff with an open case back but it is twice the price of the watch we discuss here. This Canton doesn't cut it to compete with the aqua terra but it competes with many watches in its price rangee.
For example, it competes with the new Longines conquest 38mm and has few advantages over it like the 20mm lug width, no crown guards, the color matching date wheel on the green dial and the clasp. This watch also challenges monta noble and many other models!
As a whole in its category I find it an impressive effort!
I’ll have the Monta anytime.😳😲
Agree
The Nobel?
@@RelativeTime That would be my choice
Agreed all day
Monta dials are not this good
Reminds me the most of the Tissot Gentlemen or the Henry Archer Vesterhav, would be interested to see a comparison to those too. I prefer both of those, and they cost a lot less.
This really meeda a distinct 12 oclock marker too. Imo going swiss made is a mistake, and thats as a non american
Give them time and they will be in the real game. There efforts are showing good stuff.
It looks like a nice watch and has solid specs, but tbh the watch doesn’t move me to want one. I guess we’re spoiled where an all around good watch isn’t enough of a reason to buy it. Solid review as always.
Well at a certain price point, it really has to move you. There has to be something that speaks to you.
It's not just you. I don't mind the price. I don't mind the Swiss movement. I do mind the "Swiss Made". I wanted a Jack Mason, because I wanted a Texas watch. If I want a Swiss watch, I'll get a Swiss watch. There are Swiss watches I love.
I think the Tissot Gentleman for $395 on a strap is the way I'd go if i wanted something like this.
Yep, I'm down for Sellita or some other Swiss movement to justify the price a bit, but build them in TX and lean harder into "Texas Made" because that's a better differentiator in a crowded field of micro/upstart brands.
@@strangelove770 the ability to make them at scale in Texas basically don't exist. There aren't enough watchmakers in the state.
@@gnarl12 I don't think the "scale" these guys are pushing out is enough of an issue for them right now that this is a legitimate problem. And the "watchmaking" in question would just be assembly of prefab parts, to run the size of factory they'd need at this level it would probably only take 2-3 actual watchmakers for QC and then a handful of workers who are trained in specific assembly line tasks.
@@strangelove770 you'd be surprised, it's not that easy.
Appreciate your honest and thorough review. Definitely helped in my the decision making process.
Awesome watch. I would like to see it with a really good green dial.
They do have that color way. Hopefully someone does a video with it.
Really looking forward to seeing these watches in person in a few weeks at the local watch show. JM, CW, and Farer will all be there.
Very close to a Tissot Gentleman. Nice watch.
Hi Shane, As I watch your video I'm wearing my Erebus Ascent and have a hard justifying the price tag. In my opinion Jodi is shaking up the micro brand industry with great watches at a reasonable prices with a great movement
Between him and Marc, it's a different world in that price range. Which I think is partly why Jack Mason is doing this. Going up in quality/price means less competition for them in that price range.
This is a banger! For "gada" I like the CW Sealander 39mm, and the Ocean to Orbit Lhotse, as they are a bit less dressy by not having PCLs.
In the 2nd part I'll be comparing it to my 39mm Sealander GMT. Be better to compare it to the non, but I have the GMT version and always better to compare things I have in hand.
Really looking forward to the comparison video. I live in St. Louis and have seen Monta and thought very impressive. I’m just trying to decide if I really want 38.5mm watch on 8” wrist. I already have a 38mm Khaki Field & like it but long lug to lug.
Well, I'm at 7.25 if that helps. I think I forgot to mention that in the video.
Ya that's nice watch 👍
I have been interested in Jack Mason for a while but have just fallen short of buying one. I was sad to see the Hydrotimer discontinued so soon and am still on the fence about a Strato. This was a good review and I look forward to the follow up.
Hydro-timer is a great watch, but I don't think it sold too well for them. Which is ironic, they made it because a lot of people wanted a non-gmt strat-o-timer, but they didn't buy it as much. Meanwhile, the strat-o-timer is doing really well for them.
It looks too much like other watches that I've seen. You mentioned Christopher Ward. I like the Sealander 36mm because it seems like a natural extension of their design language and it knows what it is trying to be, or maybe even what it is trying to be a well-made alternative to. But another one I think I would choose is the Ocean To Orbit Lhotse. Those guys are brand spanking new but the they're focusing on the tool aspect with a few details that the Canton is missing. That and OTO sent the watch up the mountain it is named after to establish some of its adventure cred. If the Canton wants to be the Texas Aqua-Terra it needs a little more flair that is uniquely Texan. At the very least assemble it in the U.S. (Just an opinion)
One, I love the Public Market Center in Anchorage. Two I think the watch will do well (granted the dust isn’t there). Three I think if they sold it as a “Texas Aqua Terra” by building it in the U.S., and pricing it at around $800 to $900, it may have done better. Anyway. Thanks for the great review and looking forward to the comparison. You should have worn a crazy curly hair wig when talking about what the wife said. 😆
LOL.. maybe next time. Although I think Russ has the market cornered on wacky hi-jinks.
Love your vibe bro.
Thanks! Appreciate it.
As a newer person in the hobby, I've been going back and forth on how important heritage can be as well as the subtle design choices as something that can really affect your experience with a watch. It's hard for me to separate the difference between a watch like this one that takes design cues that theoretically stand on its own as a piece worth having vs a chinese clomage with good specs. As a student, the >1k price difference isn't even something I can quite comprehend and it's getting too close to C tier grail options like the cheapest used GS to seem like it would make sense in my situation.
Would love to hear your thoughts on the citizen zenshin line!
Well, History and Heritage is a tricky thing... In some ways, it matters a lot, and in other ways it's just talk and hype. For instance, it's something that can vary between people and is un-quantifiable, so it's impossible to evaluate in terms of value.
Yet at the same time, once you get over a certain price point, value pretty much goes out the window anyway. The differences in quality get so minute, it's splitting hairs. So at that point, it's really what catches your attention and heart.
Although as a student, I'd recommend staying on the affordable side of things anyway. You got more important things to spend your money on. So I'd say get a good San Martin watch and maybe look at something like a Casio Oceanus. Amazing watches with quality you wouldn't expect.
As for the Zenshin... Not a fan of the case, but the dials look great. Need to see one in person though.
@RelativeTime Very true, it's up to each individual how much emphasis they want to put in heritage. It would make sense that a newer enthusiast like me is focused on value for money, specs, and design.
It seems maturing in the hobby shifts the view away from the material aspect and becomes more about supporting a brand, appreciating and sharing the story behind it, and adopting some of those brand values into your own identity.
@@t1n670 for some maybe. For me, it's been more about finding interesting watches from a variety of brands. Watches that I connect with for some reason or another.
Farer doing LPJ three hand watches for $500 less. I usually don’t like those kind of comps but it’s not an insignificant amount and Farer quality and design is quite good in that price range.
Edit: Farer with bracelet is $350 less expensive.
Farer is just had the same if not better quality from what I can see.
I need to give Farer another shot. I do have a slightly older model, but wasn't overly impressed by the quality. It wasn't bad... but that one seemed ok for the price. Compared to that one, CW and Monta were better, with this one somewhere between those two.
@@RelativeTime Which Farer do you have? I’ve been to a couple of WindUp watch fairs and the Farers stood out in a good way. Especially their cushion cases and their three-handers. They do have a couple of divers/chronos where I feel they went overboard with the colors and they look kind of cheap.
@@RelativeTime Btw, I’m crazy about that Citizen Chronomaster. If you find a reason to sneak it into every video you make, I won’t complain.
@@dparis2172 It's a Pembroke... I think it came out 3 years ago. Bought it used from a friend. Sort of their answer to an Oris Big Date Pointer.
It's good, colorful, and vibrant. but the finish didn't wow me like CW or Monta has.
Coffin shaped indices! It looks good to a degree but it's a tricky price point IMO to succeed at as the options widen with some quality options. I think I'd lean more towards Formex or Monta as they have their own X factor, love or hate. Rolex, TAG and home grown CW are a bit too generic for me regarding indices. I like the CW and Omega case and hands but the Mason waffle dial looks great. Polished centre link is a bit too blingy for my British reserve :)
They are sort of coffin, I think the wings slope back down, and disapear into the dial. At least with the black one. So you only catch a glint of it as the light hits the side. most of the time you just see the brushed square part. I think CW has some great case designs, but sometimes their dials can be a little boring.
I like it - except of the polished center links. Why? And the indices look like little coffins.
I agree, plus the watch is way overpriced
The indices are a square brushed center with angled sloped out polished sides. It gives it a cool effect when catches the light.
YES. Normalize more power reserve.
The Tissot Gentlemen $395 on a strap is a good choice for this type of watch.
Looks great, but is it enough to set itself apart from Formex, Monta, CW, Tissot Gentleman, Longines Conquest, or Traska on the lower $ end. Looking forward to Part 2 of this discussion!
That is the question. From a design perspective... not really, but a lot of those watches tend to blend together as well. What they are banking on is the quality helping to set them apart and gaining value that way. Like trying to have Monta level while undercutting them by a few hundred dollars.
But at the same time, at a certain price point value kind of goes out the window anyway. Like over a 1k or 1.5k, you are really splitting hairs over the quality differences. At that point, it's more about what speaks to you.
No it doesn't do enough. Putting a high end swiss movement just to charge a ridiculous amount of money, isn't it. This watch is over priced by several hundred, for a place design. Build quality..ok fine but so does CW and countless other micros...this is a fashion brand who is trying to go upscale and is failing in my opinion. They are trying to charge luxury prices for a non luxury watch.
@@RelativeTimeforgot to mention the Citizen Chronomaster, which is similar price new on EBay. Like you, I own one and can vouch that it edges out all I’d listed! Also honorable mention for affordable option is Erebus Ascent.
@@musik4u343as much as I don’t want to agree(cuz I like JM), I must agree with you.
@@musik4u343 Just curious. What's your opinion on Monta? Sort of a similar formula with them.
It's a nice-looking watch, but i think the textured dial is the best part of it. Kudos to Jack Mason for the hardness coating. The polished center link bracelet is just too much for my taste. I think the only way to get away with polished center links is with jubilee style that subdues the polished section. I still prefer my Monta Noble. Love my Strat-O-Timer though!
Is the bracelet made with fully articulating separate links? I couldn't tell for sure but would expect that.
The links look like it, but they aren't fully articulating.
Having polished centre links is virtually a cardinal sin in the GADA arena of watches. On the leather it looks fantastic.
Is it a bigger sin than leather on a diver? 😎
Nice review and nice looking watch! I do feel like it’s a bit over priced, but maybe not for some of it speaks to them. Check out the new Squale Montauk on Long Island watch! Would love to see you review it.
I wonder if I get Marc to lend me one. I've been meaning to look at Squale.
@@RelativeTime that would be awesome if he would!
Texas AQUA TERRA 😊 😎👢🤠🤠🤠🤠
Traska commuter with the scratch resistant steel like this JM but much lower price.
Traska is a brand I really want to like. But I feel in & out of love with the Summiteer so quickly, I've been hesitant to buy anything else from them.
@@RelativeTime I have the venturer. Had it for about 10 months, after overcoming a small niggle which was resolved under warranty I have not worn any of my Rolex’s since the watch was returned to me. The commuter is too plain for me but looks like a great GADA and a good alternative to the JM for a lower budget.
Still eyeing the Canton, probably in the steel blue, but being Dallas resident I'll go see it first. I would love to know what strap that is at 14:22. Thanks!
I'll have to get back to you in the strap. I'm out of town for the next few days and don't remember where I got that one. I'll have to double check it when I get back home.
@@RelativeTime thank you, safe travels!
Erebus Ascent has a better dial, similar specs and costs 1/3. Hmm
Now I haven't seen it, so I can't comment on the quality differences. But one thing to point out is that the movement itself is about $300 if you were to buy one. 3x more than a 9015.
It's a lovely watch, but I would say $1000 is about right. Other than the slightly better movement it's not really any better than the Astor+Banks fortitude, but more than twice the price
For me the issue of this watch is that at this price, it effectively is only likely to appeal because of the brand itself and its origin, albeit oddly downplayed by trading USA assembly for Swiss Made. Outside of that, I see this watch as probably quite good, but ultimately unexciting. The Ellum also seemed too expensive, but did generate intrigue.
a really beautiful watch, but for me the polished center links ruin the look. Same problem I have with the aqua terra
It's also on my Oris Aquis... I think I've gotten used to it after that watch.
@@RelativeTime Yeah, I am wearing my Aquis right now, just don't like the shiny bracelet
Even taking your (entirely reasonable) focus on the tangibles into account, and not worrying about brand equity, I don't think that's a $1,500 watch. When you think about what you can buy, from microbrands or heavyweights - so again not worrying about the brand - for similar money, it's a bit overpriced for me.
I been on a quest to collect US made watches, I live in Texas. Jack Mason, Trafford watch, Dufrane watch, Roysdon watch, etc.. This watch reminds me of the Tissot PRX Waffle dial pattern, but allot cheaper. Does it cost more because it Swiss Made Vs US made?
Well it's an American brand, and in the past some of their watches are "American Assembled" Can't say Made for legal reasons. But this one is Swiss made as is the PRX.
Should have kept it assembled in the US. That labels means something unlike “Swiss Made”. So many people aren’t aware of how little has to be Swiss to legally use that label.
There’s a reason I buy everything that Vaer releases where assembly or parts are made in the US. I will support that cause even if I don’t like the watch that much.
Like I said in the video.. I understand from a marketing perspective, but I like the idea of American Assembled better.
@@RelativeTimeUnfortunately the average consumer is a fool. They put stock in a label that means practically nothing.
@@Bob_Smith19 it's actually very hard to assemble watches at scale in the USA
150 m WR is great, the sub bussy dial is mistake. 1300 eur? Probably a wall. The look? I like it
I bought a JM watch but I don't trust the brand yet. They don't have anything in stock half the tims. Coup is years ago a famous watch person told me be careful about small brands not having stock.it's a red flag. But I do love my JM watch.
Which watch did you get?
@@RelativeTime it's a blue dress watch. dial with small seconds on it. I don't even think they make it no more.
I've been on the fence about this one for a while - still am. At this price point the Canton is squarely in the cross hairs of the likes of the Monta Noble, Farer Three Handers and of course , the Formex Essence 39 , the last of which I feel is probably the closest in terms of the best AT alternative from an indie / microbrand .
The only thing really going for it (for me at least) is that seemingly awesome movement. Though as a potential one piece collection / GADA , do you really need a 68 hour power reserve ?
That said, great review - I'm loving your collection ! Am also a huge fan of Citizen's HAQ Chronomaster series.
The other thing is the scratch-resistant coating. A lot of brands have started using it, but not in this price range. Something I wish Monta was using, and Formex. Just bought a Formex Baby Reef, it's the one thing it's missing.
I think Traska, Heron and Zelos do have that, though you could argue none are priced and spec'd to play in the same range as the above.
I owned the Reef GMT briefly and put it through its paces - I think Formex's primarily brushed finish on all its watch cases and bracelets do somewhat alleviate the appearance of scratching, though I agree - it would certainly be nice to see.
@@ImWriteOnTime Agreed... the more brushed the less it matters. Although even then, when I got my Monta Triumph, it's brushed bezel had a nice nick on it. (got it used).
I was just thinking that most brands above $1000 don't seem to offer it. Except for ironically Seiko & Citizen.
I love my Dufrane Mabry and wonder if you can compare the two.
I really need to reach out to Dufrane. I know they are down in Austin, be fun to go down and meet Steven.
Love to see a comparison with an Henry Archer watch? Thanks
Which Henry Archer?
@@RelativeTime I mostly cannot pronounce their names, but it looks very similar to this being a very well made and crisp GADA style watch.
@@RelativeTime vesterhav or Verden
I saw this and immediately thought it was an Erebuus Ascent. This is becoming a very diluted design between the luxury, mico and factory brands. The movement sets it apart, but for the look there is becoming way more options that are sub $500.
Kinda thought there identity was Texas? After all looks like they have the Texas star as a logo. Is moving everything to Switzerland losing their identity?
They are, and they are still based on DFW. But that is kind of the question moving to Swiss manufacturing.
I think it does a bit, but at the same time people still think of cw as British and Monta as an American brand even though They do the same. So I don't know.
I know nothing about this brand but moving upmarket into a segment dominated by Farer, Formex, Christopher Ward, Monta, etc will be challenging against well entrenched brands with broad recognition. It almost feels like it’s out of desperation…
I like it, though I would've preferred a no-date variant if it meant slightly less expensive. The lumed seconds hand is an advantage over the Noble's non-lumed seconds hand IMO.
However, I'm not a fan of the inconsistent clustered text at the bottom. The italicized "Canton" text looks rather cartoonish and doesn't blend well with the rest of the text. The 12 o-clock index also needs to look a little different for orientation distinction in low light even though there's a partial index by the date window.
I normally don't buy first versions of anything anymore because of potential improvements in the future, so I hope this model stays in the line up. Hopefully, with a no-date variant even if it's just one color.
$500 less and I would be all over it.
I can't help but compare this to the original Zelos Spearfish - same movement, hardness coating (albeit a diver, not GADA watch, and not being Swiss Made), selling for half the price.
How would you compare the finishing with the Noble?
The case finishing is about on the same level as the Noble. Same with the bracelet. As for the dial, I need to really look at the macro shots a bit more before doing the part 2 video, but right now I'd say they are pretty close. At least ignoring the dust on the prototype... which hopefully doesn't make it into production.
Now I think the Noble does have a slightly more refined design. Like on the Noble I love the slight chamfer on the inside of the lugs that leads to the chamfer on the bracelet. There are a few things like that. Whereas I think the Canton has a slight advantage with the scratch-resistant coating and a better clasp. Or.. maybe not a better clasp, but I think it's more comfortable and easier to get on and off. Monta's clasp has a really nice refined look, but JM is more functional. Also has a little better lume, but not by much.
@@RelativeTime Thanks! I really look forward to that
I'd take the Citizen over this, any day. Cause looks better and it's solar. Although date is meh, and so is the bracelet, i guess.
As for this, i'd say time isn't exactly right (as you mention too). As long there is a strong market, States mainly, maybe. But doubt.
Thanks for the review Shane, be well mate.
The Citizen is amazing... I need to get a video done of that one. But techinicly it's about a grand more then the Jack Mason. So it is a bit more. Luckily I got that one used for a lot less.
still waiting for non gmt Strat-o-timer
That was the hydro-timer. Or at least their answer to people asking. It hasn't done as well as the strat-o-timer.
@@RelativeTime but designs are different. I don't get it
@@Ingeborga_Dapkunaite from what I remember, people were asking for a non-Gmt version, and this is the answer they came up with.
Same case, same bracelet. But they wanted to make the design different to not overlap. Which evidently didn't give the people what they're wanting.
@@RelativeTime I want a cool white dial watch)) but not Seiko or Citizen(I got too many). CW is cool but way too expensive. Rze endeavour, Scurfa Treasure Seeker are my options. Can you suggest something else?
@@Ingeborga_Dapkunaite did you look at Jody's last watch? Can't remember if he had a white dial.
Marc may have some interesting white dial Islanders... But he's got so many models it's hard to remember them all.
Too close to Grand Seiko at that price. Quartz, yes, but… Brand new. Just more up my alley, design-wise, and waaaaay more heritage.
Where are you finding Grand Seiko's new for $1500?
If so,.that's a pretty good deal. Although I really wish they would add a scratch resistant coating to their steel models.
Their polish is amazing, but scratches if you look at it funny.
@@RelativeTime I’m torn between getting that or just going full out for an AT champagne dial.
They lost me at the middle polished links...just not appealing at all
The price really saddens me. I wonder if us Texans get a friends and family discount. I really wanna support this brand, but I’m a musician… not a Texas oil tycoon
Yeah, Jack Mason is trying to go a little more upscale. There is a lot of competition, and they are thinking this is a way to help them stand out.
Another good Texas brand is Dufrane watches. They are based out of Austin. I haven't seen one myself yet but heard good things.
www.dufranewatches.com/
Speaking of Austin. Jack Mason and a few other brands are doing a watch show there next Saturday (18th). If you want to see some in person it's a good way.
www.intersectwatchshow.com/austin
Not gonna lie.. this looks like a $300 Erebus watch. Case and dial looks very generic. Would be hard pressed to choose this over other brands like Sinn, C Ward, Monta, Formex, etc.
Since you mentioned Sinn, I'll just throw this out here as it's something I've been thinking about...
A few months ago got a 556A. Always wanted one, and found a good deal on a used one on eBay. One with the red Second hand. So technically it's 556 A RS. Anyway. I was getting some shots of it at the same time as this. It's a modern classic, but it's not a very complex design. Simple brushed case, printed dial, flat hands, bad lume.
I'm still happy with what I paid for it, but having a hard time with it having an MSRP of $1,800.
That said, also got a Formex Baby Reef a few days ago. Highly impressive.
@@RelativeTime I've had 2 556's. The aRS and the original i and I agree with your assessment. I much preferred the 556i and it's gloss black dial. The simplicity of that design has charm. But yes, not worth the 1800 USD pricetag. at $1200 or so, its good. Out of those brands I mentioned, I did find the Formex to be the most well build and luxurious feel to it. Such a great company. The only knock I have against it is the name sounds like a cleaning agent lol. Great reviews btw, love your style.
@@Mackster248 100 percent agree on the name. Really like how innovative they are too. Like the bezel changes and quick release clasp.
Been wanting to check them out for a while and fell in love with the new bronze dial 39.5mm one. Never seen anything quite like it.
@@RelativeTime the bronze 39mm is the one to get! I’ve been waiting for that to go on sale over at Reddits watch sub. Hoping to grab it one day. Looking forward to your review on it!
@@RelativeTimeSinn stopped being a good value proposition when the prices increased above $1200. Even $1200 was a stretch as they’re just a tool watch. And one w/ outer AR coating that can and will come off over time making it look bad.
Looks very similar to the Erebus Accent, which is only $499. If they were both $499, I’d still choose the Erebus.
This would be a nice watch at $499, maybe up to $750, but not past that.
At $800 I’d rather have a Tissot Gentleman or Tissot PRX.
At $1,500… this is a joke.
The logo on the dial is throwing me off. I think it's too small... looks weird. Buy a Traska commuter instead.
I feel like “Swiss Made” watch doesn’t mean what it once did in the late 80’s - early 00’s. And so the gad with lot cheaper Chinese watches keeps closing as time goes by.
That label can mean less than 50% of the watch is Swiss. The only guaranteed part is that it’s assembled there.
You have it entirely the wrong way around. It's harder to get certified as Swiss made now than it was in the 80s/90s
Not quite but pushing the envelope to be sure.
Hey Shane, usually I'm on the same page with you when talking watches. But here I have to disagree wholeheartedly. History/heritage are extremely important for me when I evaluate the value of a watch. Is it all storytelling in the end? Yes. But imagine the US without the myth of the American Dream. The country maybe wouldn't even exist anymore. It is so important to identify - with a country, religion, idea or just a product. Since micros don't have that, they have to adapt by finding the original design, the great specs for the money or the new story that people can relate to. You said it yourself. JM had a real Texas thing going and now, with all the going upmarket is the only way, they've given up on that and are just one of a million non Swiss swiss made. I'm not a fan. Cheers
Well, history and heritage is important. I wasn't trying to imply that. It's partly why some people love certain watches, like the Speedmaster. But when doing a review and talking value, that's something that's impossible to quantify (everyone likes different brands differently) and not necessarily fair to bring into the equation. That's what I was trying to say.
So I try to look at things objectively regardless of who making it, and when talking value the only way to do that is to look at the specifics. The tangible things you're getting for the money. Now when you, the individual, are buying something. That's a whole other story, at that point sometimes you have to go with your heart. And realistically, once you get above a certain price point value goes out the window anyway. It's more about what you want, then what's a good deal.
@@RelativeTime That is certainly true, especially the last part. :) Thank you for the clarification!
Overpriced when you consider what San Martin is putting out. The polished center links is a deal breaker as well.
Now I've looked at plenty of San Martin watches, and even their new brand (whatever it's called, can't remeber). They are some of the best bang for your buck around. So I can say that from a quality stand point.. the fit and finish, movement, bracelet, all that stuff. It's no contest.
However... sometimes we do need to ask ourselves how good of a watch do we actually need? That I think is the trick with watch collecting these days. Because oftentimes the improvements are things that you don't really notice or really need.
The bottom is too busy, the top of the dial has a logo that is too small.
It looks out of balance.
Swiss 60%, China 40% = good enough for Swiss made …maybe off on the math by a few percentages 😜
Pricing and branding confuse me. Jack Mason (in my mind) is Texas pride as evidenced by their Dr. Pepper release last year. I thought they were living the "F-you, I am from Texas" motto and ethos which I love! But this watch is Swiss made? And for the pricing, Formex and CW give you a lot more watch for your dollar at the $1500 price point - especially Formex. I also think the design is similar to the Henry Archer Vesterhav except the Vesterhav is 1/3 the price. SMH
Had a random idea. They recently did a special blacked-out gmt with the Anti Watch Club. What would you think if they did a "Screw You, We're From Texas" special edition of one of their watches?
Not sure what it would look like, but something distinctly Texas. Maybe make the dial a giant Texas Rangers badge, put "Screw You" on the rotor, and on the clasp change the "Be Your Best" text to "We're from Texas". Then either only sell it in person at a Texas Event, or only ship to Texas zip codes.
I might suggest it to them.
You have a beautiful mind! Watch should lean into the Texas thing as they go upmarket- not go Swiss! Bonus points if the watch comes with collectible belt buckle!
@@RelativeTime It would also need to return to US assembly. I believe that going Swiss made is a misstep for their brand.
Absolutely not!
Monta over this. Can't do the PCLs and don't like the name just like I am not a fan of the Christopher Ward moniker.
They used to have "Jack Mason" on the dial, like CW. But smartly switched it over to a Texas Star as a logo. More simple, more streamlined.
@@RelativeTime Yeah, that's an improvement. Still don't want to be running around the house asking if anyone has seen my Jack Mason?
@@A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 lol.. yeah that does sound a little off.
I see nothing in this watch that isn't done better by the Erebus Ascent, for a fraction of the price. Even the vaunted "Swiss movement" is essentially the same as a 9015 other than the power reserve, which is only useful if you really are wearing this after a weekend. Tacky polished midlinks should be illegal.
Far too overpriced - needs a minimum 40% discount.
I'd rather put that money towards a CW or a formex
Just bought a Formex Baby Reef, highly impressed with it. I've never seen the Essence, but if I were to guess on its quality from the other one. I'd say this Jack Mason would sit halfway between Fromex and CW.
A bit much for a brand i've never heard of.
As much as I hate to admit it, Rolex came up with designs that were pretty much perfect. Case in point the Subby and the OP. This is a well executed variation of an OP.
True, thats why they are still making them all these years later.
Nothing special here. Hard pass.
This watch is meehh.... pass.
I couldn't care less about the BS "Swiss Made". I think it would be overpriced at $999.
Looks like a Henry Archer with a different bezel. "Swiss Made" to raise prices is lame. Won't consider the watch because of the lame marketing gimmick...
Baltic
Cw
Formex
Monta
Even traska and some san martins have better models than this fir less. The ONLY reason to get this, is if all you care about is the movement, which really isnt much better then sw200 or eta and thise can be found for less and the japan highbeat movements, are on par lets be honest. I think they are trying to go up in price too fast and its making them look bad. Just no reason to pay this amount for this watch with so much competition thats are the same and in a lot of cases, better. Like is this watch 4 times better then Jodi's new gada watches...no lol
I'd say the G100 is more equivalent to a SW300 than a SW200. Price wise it sits between the two as well. If you wanted one I think it's about $300 by itself.
Meh.
the dial design and quality of this watch is not that great, they need to do a better job than this...
No. It's a sh*tty, lazy OP homage. Obvious money grab. and offensively priced from a brand that doesn't deserve to ask that much money.
Uckh… screw down crown. 😕
Screwdown crown is bad? Usually people compalin when there isn't one.
@@RelativeTime I know. I’m weird like that. The idea of unscrewing a crown just to wind a watch, let alone adjust the time bothers me. I love my sarb033 in part because I can just pick it up and wind away. No extra point of failure to worry about. My Oris pointer date, with only 50m of water resistance and a screw down crown is a different story. I love that watch too - probably more than the sarb if I didn’t have to fiddle with the crown all the time and worry about stripping it. I’ve owned several watches with 100m water resistance and a push crown and never had a problem with water - even after rafting and tubing. I’m okay with them on divers but they are just impractical for 99% of my use cases.
@@dparis2172 I can understand that. People seem to insist on them, but I don't think it helps WR much. I've always heard it's more to stop it from accidentally popping out underwater. Most of the WR is in the rubber seals.