Signs of molding and deliberate vitrification on stoneblocks of Ollantaytambo, Cusco, Peru
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- Go to www.ancient-mys... to see more. This video is a confirmation of the theories of late Alfredo Gamarra, who said the megalithic rocks were molded and treated with heat, giving the rocks a shiny finish.
One possibility that the ancient people made that stones from lava at the moment that it near to cool down and before solidification.
It has the appearance of being _Sliced_ by something substantially hotter than the (molten) rock itself.
The famous H shaped blocks near there at first appearance, look as if they were cast but none of them are geometrically identical - but do have that vitrified appearance found in this area.
It's easier to say that they 'must' have had technology that was lost through time but it's more correct to say that whatever method they used, they had knowledge of crafting very hard rock into perfectly fitting megalithic 'Bricks' or building blocks.
It's understandable how people almost always jump to the 'Alien Visitors' conclusion - when humans cannot even do the same thing in this day and age - and that's *with* Diamond cutting tools and high pressure methods of today.
jayc2469
Many findings lead me to think that the stone was initially malleable.
Their “treatment” vitrified it clean through it’s mass.
@@danielebbeling4056 it was said that the stones would talk to them ... XD not so much the stones were alive I think but just in tune with like a universal consciousness and or subconscious mind.
dark fire
The stone is a vibrant environment that SUPPORTS it’s own life forms .
Where is the piano player ?
Are there any stones in hiroshima with the same marks ?.
What process or application might change H2O into crystal ?
Was ALL matter less dense at this point in time?
Flood mud left over from the GREAT FLOOD.The sediment was formed in wooden boxes or slabs were carved using wood trowels.It petrified.Megalithic sites worldwide have similar features.This strongly supports the biblical narrative of human origins.
I 'm not sure what you mean by molding. But I think the vitrification's were the result of them cutting away stone in the quarrying process and additionally in the precise fitting... It doesn't make sense to me that the stone was molded... If it were wouldn't they make less, but, more exact similar sizes and not have so many different sizes? Please don't accuse me of trying to be a wise guy. Machining, and engineering are my trades of over 30yrs. I also have a good understanding of many types of masonry old and modern...and I have also spent countless hours studying this and other stone work of the area... I have though much about the golden wedge theories... And, thought perhaps, the wedge was far more than, just a wedge.... My purpose is not to take anything away from, but to offer up other considerations to the discussion... In addition to heat dematerialization could have also caused this look of vitrification, if you are willing to consider such a technology being used... Most engineers fear of being shamed by those who can harm their carrier. I do not have such fears...
O,,,
Opinionator52 Molding here means that molds were used to mold the stone when it was in a soft state. Not necessarily one standard mold, but any object that can be used to form stone, like what you can do with clay. So a spatel or metal objects. When you make the inventory of all the advanced stonework there, you see that there must have been a way to work it in a soft form because of the things they could do with the stones, like the precision, the scale, the strange forms and the prints they were able to make into the stone, or the way certain protuberances are present on the stones. The vitrification is present exactly on that type of stones; so we have 2 conclusions, 1. the stone must have been in a soft state, 2. the stones were treated with some technology that left vitrification traces, so most probable that technology involved the use of heat.
Jan Peter de Jong maybe not, to think moulding incandescent rock imply use of strong refractory mould and quite strong on the other hand i imagined a desintegrator theory based on what is observed energy bean very thin like 1-2 mm that break atoms bonding , any matter touched by the beam will disintegrate in mono atomic particles and exit the cut surface as fine dust but as soon as the silicon oxide touche the walls it will tend to re-bound to the surface creating the glassing observed no heat needed , that cutting head should have been mounted of CNC type machine enabling the cutting of any form needed , all of that is aliens technology way way over what we have today
francois clermont I very much agree precisely with what you are saying on the order of CNC like disintegration leaving behind the look of vitrification without heat... Also the quarried cavities leaving behind blind holes, that are just one more example of very advanced and precise technology... Much like Sacsayhuaman, in Peru... I also believe those massive stones were rough quarried and sized to a precise fit at the point of placement... Most especially at Sacsayhuaman because of the massive weight and shapes. I can't envision a molded theory even with the markings that look as if a spatula was used (I believe that too was disintegration technology) O,,,
Opinionator52 Imagining the purpose of Sacsayhuaman, is also a deep subject! I must have been easy for the builders or it likely would not have been so complex!
Opinionator52
yes, if you have a beam that can adjusted to any shape needed for carving, the ultimate tool , i imagine also a main computer and remote surveyor equipped with 3 D sensor , the surveyor on site take the measurement and the cutting machine shape exactly to the required shape then anti-G transporter deliver and adjust rock at the exact position with a perfect fit look so simple with proper tools
What you see are impressions or indentations in the surface of blocks of stone caused by other blocks lying on them whilst their surfaces were softened by some process or agent. There is NO evidence of moulding, which is a redundant hypothesis because the softening theory better explains the visual evidence.
With moulding we mean that the stones were soft like clay and could be easily reshaped. It explains better how even very bog blocks were made to fit perfectly. Afterwards they were hardened with some technology with heat, which caused the vitrified layer that many times can be observed, that is why the visual evidence that I have seen.
Why would this not be caused by intense pressure of another stone sliding over it?
that is of course possible, but thing is that it is repeated on many stones; it has been done systematically, repeated in stones used for construction of sites like Ollantaytambo,
You would have to either STUPID not to be able to see whats on display here. !
I clearly SEE the ancient stone inhabitants!
What shall I DO with this magnificent gift ?
I want to spend my remaining life documenting what my eye beholds !
There HAS to be a type of energy being emitted for their forms to become visible to me.
Are there others that see them too ?
The largest forms are COMPRISED
Of successively smaller living component beings and environments.
It goes down to training a 10x magnifying glass a few inches from it.
At this micron level; I find luminous-faced beings peering out from behind the lattice structure of the stone face.
Many eyes are operational in every stone.