I believe it was placed there at the request of some of the engineers because of how KSP inspired them to pursue their current profession... Which is funny, because according to my game hour log, I am first in line to walk on Mars... I'll try not to hold my breath...
The Starliner's interior has a more industrial look, à la "The Expanse" than Dragon. I can dig it :) It's good to see many space transportation system cohabiting in my lifetime !
I can hardly wait for tomorrow so I can tell my boss that if something doesn't go wrong with my next job then I'm not doing my job right...Yeah, sounds like plan...lol
Wow! It's almost like it's 1969 already. What a "tremendous" achievement, to send an empty capsule into low-Earth orbit. Only 53 years after we sent men to the moon in a similar capsule. "Breathtaking" creativity and "rapid" development. Good Grief!
Well it’s a fully automated, reusable spacecraft, almost triple the size of Apollo which was one use only and had to be manually flown and guided with sextants through windows
@@victorlarroyocolon5679 New planes need three great technologies 1/Self-driving planes need clean energy technologies like night solar cells and kinetic energy 2/Self-driving planes need fast-flying engines to travel 10,000 km in 60 minutes 3/Self-driving planes need artificial intelligence devices, live map technologies, satellites, and the development of artificial intelligence capabilities in order to distinguish between different things. 4/Artificial intelligence techniques must be added to large aircraft for mass transportation and small aircraft for individual transportation in order to obtain self-driving air vehicles so that they do not need a human leader Therefore, we must stop manufacturing and designing old planes, because old planes are the planes that need a human leader, and for this reason we must stop manufacturing old planes, and this is in order to save time and efforts in the manufacture of new planes ((self-driving)). (Please send these five demands to engineers and technicians in the field of mechanical engineering and the civil aircraft industry)
@@victorlarroyocolon5679 Is a diameter of 198" vs 154" "triple the size?" Maybe you're comparing passenger capacity, 7 (briefly) vs 3 (on longer missions)? As far as reusability, the Space Shuttle was more "reusable" than Starliner. It could be used for many times the number of missions for which Starliner is rated. The Shuttle had vastly more internal volume and longer independent endurance. I believe Apollo Astronauts used a sextant to CONFIRM its position. Didn't Gemini capsules have the ability to automatically dock in the '60's? Also "In 1969, McDonnell-Douglas proposed a 'Big Gemini' that could have been used to shuttle up to 12 astronauts to the planned space stations." - Wikipedia. That project was designed to be reusable, like Starliner. My point is that North American Aviation got the fundamentals right on a design for Apollo that they began in 1961 (and was itself, conceptually, a scaled-up Mercury Capsule). It now takes the United States 20 to 30 years to build an evolved/slightly enlarged Apollo Capsule, a new Fighter Aircraft or a Nuclear Carrier for the Navy. The Wright Bros. first flight was in 1903. 30 years later, in 1933 both the Boeing 247 and the Douglas DC-1 had flown. By 1954 the Lockheed F-104 was flying, capable of Mach 2.0 and reaching an altitude of over 100,000 ft. How big an advance is Starliner from Apollo, given that it has been 54 years since Apollo's first MANNED flight. How many manned flights has the Starliner made so far?
I hope the vehicle itself lives up to it's expectations even if I do not like the old concept of using one time use boosters when we have technology for reusable ones.
Engineers must develop mechanical engineering in order to move from the old transportation era to the era of smart mobility because the era of smart transportation is the way to escape from the problems of fatigue and constant fatigue & Here are the differences between old transportation and smart transportation 1/Old planes bring annoying problems and troubles to humans because of travel procedures such as searching for taxis in order to reach the airport and traveling annoying distances in order to obtain a passport and airline ticket 2/Self-flying planes save millions of people from the problems of old planes because self-flying planes transport people directly from his home to his beloved’s house in distant countries because self-flying planes do not need human leadership for the plane 1/Therefore, engineers must create and design engineering maps for self-flying planes, because self-flying planes depend on the artificial intelligence leadership of air vehicles. 2/Also for this reason, artificial intelligence devices must be developed in order to increase the ability of artificial intelligence to distinguish between all the different things like the human brain 3/ The third requirement is we ask all those working in the field of mechanical engineering should add artificial intelligence techniques in all mechanical engineering projects in order to move into the era of intelligent transportation system and smart cities. (Please send these three complaints and demands also to workers in the field of mechanical engineering and artificial intelligence )
So Boeing took twice as long to build a vehichle that is twice as expensive and only half as capable? AND they need surplus russian rocket motors to get it to orbit? How is this not an embarrassment?
Is not an "embarrassment" because the porpuse of this mission is *"working together"* Sir. Yes, that is an undertadment. Please be happy and not cultural points of view judge.
@@sergiolaurencio7534 Starliner is neither "sustainable" (single use russian boosters) nor "green" (single use booster polluting the ocean after launch). Nor is it reliable or dependable. Ten years ago Boeing had a 50 year headstart...now they are decades behind.
Congratulations Boeing. But this isn't an historic day in human spacefilight... When will the cost per launch come down an order of magnitude, remember taxpayers have to pay for each launch.
Engineers must develop mechanical engineering in order to move from the old transportation era to the era of smart mobility because the era of smart transportation is the way to escape from the problems of fatigue and constant fatigue & Here are the differences between old transportation and smart transportation 1/Old planes bring annoying problems and troubles to humans because of travel procedures such as searching for taxis in order to reach the airport and traveling annoying distances in order to obtain a passport and airline ticket 2/Self-flying planes save millions of people from the problems of old planes because self-flying planes transport people directly from his home to his beloved’s house in distant countries because self-flying planes do not need human leadership for the plane 1/Therefore, engineers must create and design engineering maps for self-flying planes, because self-flying planes depend on the artificial intelligence leadership of air vehicles. 2/Also for this reason, artificial intelligence devices must be developed in order to increase the ability of artificial intelligence to distinguish between all the different things like the human brain 3/ The third requirement is we ask all those working in the field of mechanical engineering should add artificial intelligence techniques in all mechanical engineering projects in order to move into the era of intelligent transportation system and smart cities. (Please send these three complaints and demands also to workers in the field of mechanical engineering and artificial intelligence )
Those blue pressure suits looks so much better than those cheap creepy-looking SpaceX suits with those huge helmets and the tops hardly fit right that's what a spacesuit supposed to look like.
@@badmonkey2222 are you saying that because you look at them and don’t like the look? Or is it because SpaceX Makes them so you don’t like them? The Boeing ones make you look like a marshmallow but they still get the job done and that’s all anyone should care about. Both suits do their jobs.
Honestly it’s just embarrassing continuing cooperation with the Russians given what they’re doing. Nelson should give them an ultimatum to take their modules and go. Anything less is disgusting appeasement.
Those hyperlapse clips of the station from Starliner are pretty epic. Congrats to the teams at NASA and Boeing!
Congrats to everyone who worked on Staliner!
To infinity and beyond
A KERBIN! I knew KSP is real!
Everything went well..... congratulations 🎉
Congrats Boeing. Now we have Dragon and Starliner🇺🇸
Congratulations guys 🙏🔥 I've been waiting for this and I'm so glad it finally happened ❤️
Very nice seeing starliner on the ISS !
Congratulations Boeing. Thank you to the Russian crew for being so kind.
Congrats 🥂👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Awesome experience
I see a Jeb plush!
I believe it was placed there at the request of some of the engineers because of how KSP inspired them to pursue their current profession...
Which is funny, because according to my game hour log, I am first in line to walk on Mars...
I'll try not to hold my breath...
The Starliner's interior has a more industrial look, à la "The Expanse" than Dragon. I can dig it :)
It's good to see many space transportation system cohabiting in my lifetime !
Right On
Zabardast!
Let's go team space
I can hardly wait for tomorrow so I can tell my boss that if something doesn't go wrong with my next job then I'm not doing my job right...Yeah, sounds like plan...lol
Cool ...
Very good work!!!
Wake up bro, it's 1969~
Cool
with this vehicle costing so much more than dragon, why use it?
Wow! It's almost like it's 1969 already. What a "tremendous" achievement, to send an empty capsule into low-Earth orbit. Only 53 years after we sent men to the moon in a similar capsule. "Breathtaking" creativity and "rapid" development. Good Grief!
Well it’s a fully automated, reusable spacecraft, almost triple the size of Apollo which was one use only and had to be manually flown and guided with sextants through windows
@@victorlarroyocolon5679
The era of the intelligent mobility system
@@victorlarroyocolon5679
New planes need three great technologies
1/Self-driving planes need clean energy technologies like night solar cells and kinetic energy
2/Self-driving planes need fast-flying engines to travel 10,000 km in 60 minutes
3/Self-driving planes need artificial intelligence devices, live map technologies, satellites, and the development of artificial intelligence capabilities in order to distinguish between different things.
4/Artificial intelligence techniques must be added to large aircraft for mass transportation and small aircraft for individual transportation in order to obtain self-driving air vehicles so that they do not need a human leader
Therefore, we must stop manufacturing and designing old planes, because old planes are the planes that need a human leader, and for this reason we must stop manufacturing old planes, and this is in order to save time and efforts in the manufacture of new planes ((self-driving)).
(Please send these five demands to engineers and technicians in the field of mechanical engineering and the civil aircraft industry)
@@victorlarroyocolon5679 Is a diameter of 198" vs 154" "triple the size?" Maybe you're comparing passenger capacity, 7 (briefly) vs 3 (on longer missions)? As far as reusability, the Space Shuttle was more "reusable" than Starliner. It could be used for many times the number of missions for which Starliner is rated. The Shuttle had vastly more internal volume and longer independent endurance. I believe Apollo Astronauts used a sextant to CONFIRM its position. Didn't Gemini capsules have the ability to automatically dock in the '60's? Also "In 1969, McDonnell-Douglas proposed a 'Big Gemini' that could have been used to shuttle up to 12 astronauts to the planned space stations." - Wikipedia. That project was designed to be reusable, like Starliner.
My point is that North American Aviation got the fundamentals right on a design for Apollo that they began in 1961 (and was itself, conceptually, a scaled-up Mercury Capsule).
It now takes the United States 20 to 30 years to build an evolved/slightly enlarged Apollo Capsule, a new Fighter Aircraft or a Nuclear Carrier for the Navy. The Wright Bros. first flight was in 1903. 30 years later, in 1933 both the Boeing 247 and the Douglas DC-1 had flown. By 1954 the Lockheed F-104 was flying, capable of Mach 2.0 and reaching an altitude of over 100,000 ft. How big an advance is Starliner from Apollo, given that it has been 54 years since Apollo's first MANNED flight. How many manned flights has the Starliner made so far?
Advancements in technology aren’t always the flashiest.
3!
Russia and US work really will in space, why can't it be the same on land? 😔
Cables and wires holding up crew members
👏👏👏
❤️
Thank god for only a swift and speedy multiple year delay.
💯
Compared to Dragon this was a colossal waste of money
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜
I hope the vehicle itself lives up to it's expectations even if I do not like the old concept of using one time use boosters when we have technology for reusable ones.
NASA developed that technology back in the sixties and sold it to your hero.
@@badmonkey2222 they didn’t
@@weekiely1233 yes... they did.
@@weekiely1233 I swear by all your other comments you are just all up on Elons nutzz, literally...
Try to not talk about the person you hate all day and let others have opinions for once!
👍
Compro 3 unidades e a tecnologia para o ministério da tecnologia do Brasil
🥂🌍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Compro 3 unidades para o governo do Brasil
Compro 1 unidades e a tecnologia para o ministério da tecnologia do Brasil
Excellent 👌❤️😎👍 has a space shuttle vibe to it, not sure why...
The Boeing Company
The era of the intelligent mobility system. Transportation Development Techniques
Engineers must develop mechanical engineering in order to move from the old transportation era to the era of smart mobility because the era of smart transportation is the way to escape from the problems of fatigue and constant fatigue
& Here are the differences between old transportation and smart transportation
1/Old planes bring annoying problems and troubles to humans because of travel procedures such as searching for taxis in order to reach the airport and traveling annoying distances in order to obtain a passport and airline ticket
2/Self-flying planes save millions of people from the problems of old planes because self-flying planes transport people directly from his home to his beloved’s house in distant countries because self-flying planes do not need human leadership for the plane
1/Therefore, engineers must create and design engineering maps for self-flying planes, because self-flying planes depend on the artificial intelligence leadership of air vehicles.
2/Also for this reason, artificial intelligence devices must be developed in order to increase the ability of artificial intelligence to distinguish between all the different things like the human brain
3/ The third requirement is we ask all those working in the field of mechanical engineering should add artificial intelligence techniques in all mechanical engineering projects in order to move into the era of intelligent transportation system and smart cities.
(Please send these three complaints and demands also to workers in the field of mechanical engineering and artificial intelligence )
Jeb!
I hope starliner lives up to the hype, but honestly? i have a bad feeling about this. here's hoping its gas...lol
¡wow! Putin is an astronaut😯😯
Everything you're watching it's cgi
No it's not
So Boeing took twice as long to build a vehichle that is twice as expensive and only half as capable? AND they need surplus russian rocket motors to get it to orbit? How is this not an embarrassment?
Is not an "embarrassment" because the porpuse of this mission is *"working together"* Sir. Yes, that is an undertadment. Please be happy and not cultural points of view judge.
@@sergiolaurencio7534 Starliner is neither "sustainable" (single use russian boosters) nor "green" (single use booster polluting the ocean after launch). Nor is it reliable or dependable. Ten years ago Boeing had a 50 year headstart...now they are decades behind.
The concerned spain conversantly report because ash logistically answer during a brown doctor. parallel, animated latency
Congratulations Boeing. But this isn't an historic day in human spacefilight... When will the cost per launch come down an order of magnitude, remember taxpayers have to pay for each launch.
Yes but we pay 1/2 a cent on the dollar, and that's for ALL NASA budget, not just these launches.
@@Trestin13
Transportation Development Techniques
Engineers must develop mechanical engineering in order to move from the old transportation era to the era of smart mobility because the era of smart transportation is the way to escape from the problems of fatigue and constant fatigue
& Here are the differences between old transportation and smart transportation
1/Old planes bring annoying problems and troubles to humans because of travel procedures such as searching for taxis in order to reach the airport and traveling annoying distances in order to obtain a passport and airline ticket
2/Self-flying planes save millions of people from the problems of old planes because self-flying planes transport people directly from his home to his beloved’s house in distant countries because self-flying planes do not need human leadership for the plane
1/Therefore, engineers must create and design engineering maps for self-flying planes, because self-flying planes depend on the artificial intelligence leadership of air vehicles.
2/Also for this reason, artificial intelligence devices must be developed in order to increase the ability of artificial intelligence to distinguish between all the different things like the human brain
3/ The third requirement is we ask all those working in the field of mechanical engineering should add artificial intelligence techniques in all mechanical engineering projects in order to move into the era of intelligent transportation system and smart cities.
(Please send these three complaints and demands also to workers in the field of mechanical engineering and artificial intelligence )
Those blue pressure suits looks so much better than those cheap creepy-looking SpaceX suits with those huge helmets and the tops hardly fit right that's what a spacesuit supposed to look like.
Your opinion. I prefer SpaceX suit. Again, it’s your opinion, which isn’t under my influence.
Maybe get something better to do than go around bashing SpaceX. Are that that obsessed with Elon?
@@weekiely1233 my opinion, I think they look ridiculous.
@@badmonkey2222 are you saying that because you look at them and don’t like the look? Or is it because SpaceX Makes them so you don’t like them?
The Boeing ones make you look like a marshmallow but they still get the job done and that’s all anyone should care about. Both suits do their jobs.
"Spaceba?" Nyet. 👎👎👎
Wouldn’t be a NASA event without the propaganda spiel 😂
Honestly it’s just embarrassing continuing cooperation with the Russians given what they’re doing. Nelson should give them an ultimatum to take their modules and go. Anything less is disgusting appeasement.
No.
Yes
This was faked
YK There's something called LIVE