Update on LRASM and HALO programs with Lockheed Martin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 вер 2024
- In this interview, Tony Desmet, Director of Hypersonics and Strike Weapons at Lockheed Martin, shares the latest developments with the LRASM (Long Range Anti-Ship Missile) and Hypersonic Air-Launched Offensive (HALO) Anti-Surface Warfare weapon programs. LRASM and HALO are next generation air-launched anti-ship missiles for the US Navy.
=====================
LRASM Program:
Lockheed Martin has recently conducted Integrated Test Event 12 for the LRASM weapon in partnership with the Navy.
LRASM’s high-end lethality and survivability was successfully demonstrated
Lockheed Martin and the US Navy continue to work on integrating LRASM aboard various platforms, including the P-8 and F-35 (B and C variants).
International interest in LRASM, with Australia being the first non-U.S. user.
HALO Program:
Lockheed Martin is one of the two competitors selected by NAVAIR for the HALO program.
The company is investing to make HALO available to the Navy as early as possible.
Schedule is critical, and Lockheed Martin aims to continue the partnership for anti-surface capability.
=====================
For new videos every week, subscribe here! www.youtube.com...
Follow us on Twitter: / navalnewscom
Follow us on LinkedIn: / navalnews
Like us on Facebook: navalnewscom
Check out our daily naval defense news coverage at: www.navalnews....
NAVAL NEWS is fully focused on naval topics. We cover the latest naval defense shows & events. We also report on naval technology from all over the world. Navalnews.com is updated daily with in-depth features, industry, and naval forces news round-ups, event coverage, video reports and more. Our top of the line site is responsive across all mobile and desktop devices.
Wish you asked about mark 41 VLS LRASM development.
Thanks! Always enjoy your updates!
For F-35A and C users, the JSM is a much more compelling option in my opinion. The B could be either way seeing as how it doesn't fit the JSM internally (1000 vs 2000).
For platforms like the Super Hornets, Poseidons, and VLS launched, i see a lot of promise. As a direct replacement for Harpoon, the NSM is a more compelling option again.
I wonder why many navy's around the world are up arming their ships with smaller NSM and not the heavier hitting longer ranged LRASM....maybe it is because the NSM is ready now?
Does LRASM have a boxed launcher concept to be located on a ships deck for say a Harpoon boxed launcher replacement or is it MK41 VLS cell launched only?
This could be a reason NSM is selling like hot cakes whilst being a proven good missile. But a LRASM hit, could do a huge amount of damage.
@@LeonAust both the LRASM and NSM have box launchers, both are also in the works for being adapted to work with the Mk.41 VLS system. There are a lot of reasons why the NSM is so popular. Its proven, available and cheaper. Its also a lot lighter of a weapon as said, and this can be important for a lot of applications. Top weight on smaller ships have a huge impact on stability and sea keeping.
@@AugmentedGravity Yep ...top weight and price
@@LeonAust and the thing is that both are fantastic systems. The NSM doesn’t have the raw punching power of the LRASM with its 1000 pound BROACH warhead, but the NSM still has enough power to get most jobs done.
I'm a bit curious what the nature of the actual integration work is with the F35. Lockheed already has the JASSM integrated, so you'd think that most of the software integration work would be based on that existing code repository of that ordinance with a very similar mission profile.
👏👍🤙
Seems like since you know the platform its going on it would be integrated off the line.
That is not how military procurement works. All of the projects are like business silos/ departments with separate funding. Also congress has to fund the things, after the military askes for funding. The US Military is also going to want to integrate it into older more numerous platforms first. LRASM and F-35 only went into full production not too long ago, so no point in integrating a work in progress, which might change. The US Navy does not have that many F-35C, and the few it has are not a priority compared to the F-18, P-8, etc.
mmmm ... ver para creer
👍👍 What's the payload? 🤠
453kg of boom
Your guest was very vague
Yeah, give all of the info and lose a highly paid cushy job and go to federal prison for 10 to 20 years. Yeah, I would be really vague too.
MBDA !!! The One !!! 💪 🇨🇵 🤙
This guy might be the head of hypersonics but I wish he could sell the product a bit more.
What is needed is not a tech head boss who give's a few word answers and then goes quiet but a salesman that can talk the talk within his allowances of disclosure.
Awful person to interview, I felt sorry for Xavier
Not very forthcoming, your guest. Very careful about what he says.
People are kinda vague and not forthcoming about giving information about a secret project, which could result in them going to prison for 10 to 20 years.
And It also won't work without our software, that we release each year for bazillion dollars just like F35.
The Lockheed Martin bloke probably doesn't even know where Australia is!! What a non-chalant goshawk!! Jim, South Australia, where we're building Submarines of what evertype. and where we should be doing LM CFR's R&D. Keep doing your do Xavier!!.