Lec 30 | MIT 18.01 Single Variable Calculus, Fall 2007

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @joebrinson5040
    @joebrinson5040 2 роки тому +8

    Thanks M.I.T. for making these lectures available to us. It is enlightening to see such talented teachers teach. It is mentally stimulating to think about these concepts. It is satisfying to learn.

  • @quagmire444
    @quagmire444 12 років тому +54

    The thing I love about math, is that it is totally independent of the world. Although mathematics does have applicaitons in many aspects of reality, it doesnt necessarily say anything about it. So math in itself is really formless, and a playground for people to tinker around in. Where everyone can enjoy and express new ideas.

  • @yerdoskryldakov5659
    @yerdoskryldakov5659 Рік тому +5

    Hi everybody! I have eventually reached here!🎉 Thanks MIT for giving such opportunity to listen to the wonderful lessons!

  • @dany2boy
    @dany2boy 12 років тому +5

    Partial fractions starts at 0:45 until 18:20, which is also important.

  • @Starrynova
    @Starrynova 15 років тому +6

    woohoo integration by parts...how exciting...reminds me of the lecture I had a week ago!

  • @firesean_
    @firesean_ 2 роки тому +4

    Props to Saurav Bastola, ua-cam.com/channels/7hkeE-LRyzietNCecWnHLg.html for the listed topics.
    Lecture 1: Rate of Change
    Lecture 2: Limits
    Lecture 3: Derivatives
    Lecture 4: Chain Rule
    Lecture 5: Implicit Differentiation
    Lecture 6: Exponential and Log
    Lecture 7: Exam 1 Review
    Lecture 9: Linear and Quadratic Approximations
    Lecture 10: Curve Sketching
    Lecture 11: Max-min
    Lecture 12: Related Rates
    Lecture 13: Newton's Method
    Lecture 14: Mean Value Theorem
    Lecture 15: Antiderivative
    Lecture 16: Differential Equations
    Lecture 18: Definite Integrals
    Lecture 19: First Fundamental Theorem
    Lecture 20: Second Fundamental Theorem
    Lecture 21: Applications to Logarithms
    Lecture 22: Volumes
    Lecture 23: Work, Probability
    Lecture 24: Numerical Integration
    Lecture 25: Exam 3 Review
    Lecture 27: Trig Integrals
    Lecture 28: Inverse Substitution
    Lecture 29: Partial Fractions
    Lecture 30: Integration by Parts
    Lecture 31: Parametric Equations
    Lecture 32: Polar Coordinates
    Lecture 33: Exam 4 Review
    Lecture 35: Indeterminate Forms
    Lecture 36: Improper Integrals
    Lecture 37: Infinite Series
    Lecture 38: Taylor's Series
    Lecture 39: Final Review

  • @patridix14
    @patridix14 13 років тому

    Integration using the Reduction Formula starts at 27:45

  • @jinnjinn5567
    @jinnjinn5567 2 роки тому

    16:40 you can also use the special integration formula
    1/a * arctan(u/a) at that point

  • @guynamedjoe
    @guynamedjoe 12 років тому

    Dang, this professor does every portion of the problem so quick that it would take me a little while to do each portion.

  • @markkerollos
    @markkerollos 13 років тому +1

    @MikeDunn The names aren't fancy, they're explanatory. Single variable calculus is just what the name says it is, calculus involving only one variable. I'm sure you can figure out the other one. Calc 1 or calc 2 don't tell you what the subject is actually about.

  • @not_amanullah
    @not_amanullah 7 місяців тому

    Thanks ❤️🤍

  • @mrme3093
    @mrme3093 4 роки тому

    Hello! Why is Professor stop reducing n to zero (30:22) if actually we can continue reducing to negative numbers, e.g. n=-1,-2,-3.

    • @xnonqme3716
      @xnonqme3716 7 місяців тому

      You have to understand the point of reducing the integral, which is ofcourse to solve it. If you reduce to n = 0, you have the integral of e^x which is e^x. Using negative values of n makes the problem no easier. In other words, can you integrate e^x/x directly?

  • @davidvalle3068
    @davidvalle3068 7 років тому +1

    This is exactly what I'm doing in class!

  • @hnkul702
    @hnkul702 12 років тому

    The G(n-1) function IS the integral of x^(n-1)*e^x.

  • @yawofori-addae3888
    @yawofori-addae3888 6 років тому +1

    At 47:43 how is the integral of 2pi * ex * dx equal to the area of a triangle?

    • @nikos677
      @nikos677 6 років тому +3

      Well the integral of a y = 2πex is actually a line with slope λ = 2πe . Also it evaluates y = 0 for x = 0 & y= 2πe for x = 1. Clearly the integral from 0 to 1 of this function will be just the area of a triangle. I hope i helped :D .

    • @vglez8088
      @vglez8088 5 років тому

      Fact 1:-
      2 * pi * e = circumference (top cylinder) and 2 * pi * e * x = volume (top of cylinder).
      (note you will need to subtract the bottom part from the top afterwards to complete the integral)
      Fact 2:-
      e is the radius or height and x is the base which when equal to 1 (lower limit e ^ 0) by Pythagoras theorem; solving the integral is the same as the area of a right-angle triangle and equal to 1/2 * base x height, scaled by a factor of two since the shell has a right and a left triangle when swept around.

    • @nikos677
      @nikos677 5 років тому

      @@hyungjoonpark83 You're welcome :) .

  • @ttttrigg3r
    @ttttrigg3r 13 років тому +9

    I had to look up the word recalcitrant

  • @zack_120
    @zack_120 3 роки тому +1

    45:55 - shouldn't it be +2 (-2(-1) instead of -2?

    • @mingjiedu7939
      @mingjiedu7939 3 роки тому

      No, -2 is right because [e*(1)^2-0-0+2*(0-1)]=e-2

  • @handrez.
    @handrez. Рік тому

    thank you

  • @duddurajareddy5177
    @duddurajareddy5177 3 роки тому

    integration of 1/x^2+2x+3 is =1/2^1/2 tan inverse of x+1/2^1/2

  • @flowewritharoma
    @flowewritharoma 13 років тому

    last lecture . awesome lecture.

  • @imegatrone
    @imegatrone 13 років тому

    I Really Like The Video Integration by parts, reduction formulae From Your

  • @markkerollos
    @markkerollos 13 років тому +1

    @MikeDunn That's good and all for people in the US, but you must realise that as an online thing it will be accessed from people outside the US such as myself to who "calc 1" has no meaning.

    • @newmoi2285
      @newmoi2285 20 днів тому

      cal 1 is everything upto multivariable cal starting after alebra and trig from limits and continuity. SO its just a logistic of how its organized sir.

  • @usayeed727
    @usayeed727 14 років тому +1

    @ 49:17 when he writes (-1) is actually correct. Why's it +1 when -e0 is -(1) seeing as e0 is 1? Great lecture though, seriously interesting. Makes me kind of want to do Mathematics in University, and I know this is just one lecture, but it doesn't seem to be as hard as I thought it would be. I guess it's just the fact that most people hate Math and find it super difficult, but I found this lecture enjoyable! Lol, sometimes can't believe I'm one to love Maths...

    • @MufaddalHakim
      @MufaddalHakim Рік тому

      I might be a late but +1 is correct because it's 0 - (-e^0) = e^0 = 1

  • @randomness2622
    @randomness2622 6 років тому +1

    The mic noise and hiss is distracting in this lecture, I hope someone could fix it ..

  • @sachingothwalmathematics5723

    I am Sachin gothwal Mathematics of India very nice sir 🎉🎉

  • @thomaslauritson9443
    @thomaslauritson9443 8 років тому

    How come at 45:55 when -2*(-y) it's -2 instead of +2

    • @superpus
      @superpus 8 років тому

      +Thomas Lauritson Because he evaluates the function at e - the function evaluated at 1. [e] - [+2] = [e-2]

  • @mitfutstudent
    @mitfutstudent 15 років тому

    yes

  • @seongkim2480
    @seongkim2480 7 років тому +2

    F. how can every single lec can be quality guaranteed?

  • @usayeed727
    @usayeed727 14 років тому +1

    @ 50:18
    Now I see, guess I made the same mistake. It is -1.

  • @trialbyrest8748
    @trialbyrest8748 5 років тому +1

    6:57 "aright" :D

  • @saubaral
    @saubaral 4 роки тому +4

    ooh am i the first one in 2020 quarantine to reach here ;P

  • @SimmySimmy
    @SimmySimmy 5 років тому

    20:30 Where is the dx comes from? from d(u*v)/dx=u*dv/dx+v*du/dx get d(u*v)=u*dv+v*du, the integrate both side, ∫1d(u*v)=∫u*dv+∫v*du, finally we get u*v=∫u*dv+∫v*du

  • @MikeDunn
    @MikeDunn 13 років тому

    @markkerollos I know that, chief. But the rest of the country calls it "Calc 1" or "Calc 2", and people pretty much know what it is.

  • @dostoguven
    @dostoguven 8 років тому

    cool!

  • @ohfcukchris
    @ohfcukchris 13 років тому +1

    @nomchews I don't think you're qualified to be taking shots at an MIT professor.

  • @KaLNFoRc3R
    @KaLNFoRc3R 12 років тому +2

    ok... so mcdonalds it is

  • @qaimjan746
    @qaimjan746 11 років тому

    why this lecture is not being downloaded on Idm?

  • @MathMikie
    @MathMikie 15 років тому +11

    the crackling in this video is annoying

  • @priyeshgupta164
    @priyeshgupta164 4 роки тому

    The one guy who disliked....who r u??

  • @amaduddinwatto
    @amaduddinwatto 13 років тому

    THIS PROFEESOR OF MATHEMATICS IS NICE
    I WANT TO GIVE HIM TIPS BEING A STUDENT
    PLEASE SIR ALWAYS ATTEMPT THOSE QUESTIONS WHICH YOU SOLVE ON BLACK BOARD
    OTHERWISE DON'T ATTEMPT
    I LIKED YOUR WAY OF TEACHING BUT YOU WILL GET SOME TIME TO BE PROFESSOR WALTER LEWIN
    HE WAS LEGEND
    YOU SHOULD SEE HIS LECTURES TO TEACH STUDENTS AS AN EXAMPLE
    I LOVE TO BE AN AUSTRONAUT TO WATCH YOUR PROGRAMMES

  • @MikeDunn
    @MikeDunn 13 років тому

    Single Variable Calculus? Multi-Variable Calculus? Can't we just say Calc 1, Calc 2, or Calc 3 instead of coming up with fancy names?

    • @TonyG-n1m
      @TonyG-n1m 5 місяців тому

      What does calc 1 mean? What does it tell you about the course? What I do know is that single variable calculus means we are integrating and diffrentraiting with respect to one variable. Single/Multi variable is more descriptive and actually describes what you learn.

    • @TonyG-n1m
      @TonyG-n1m 5 місяців тому +1

      Oh wait... this was 13 years ago 🤣🤣

    • @MikeDunn
      @MikeDunn 5 місяців тому

      @@TonyG-n1m That's ok. There's no time limit on a Reply.