Holee FUCK that thing is sneaky. Looks like a good choice for covering your DDs and cruisers around cap circles with that speed, British HE and British heals. With the gun choices too she really sounds like a really big but slow Mogami rather than a fast BB. Not sure about that turning radius though, almost CV levels of clunky there.
hi, i am great fan from your work, can you make a video about the king georg V in neer futur? pleas make it as an tier 7 comparison to the nelson. is she the work work worh it? feels her armor and alround tankyness better? are her guns very bad in compar to the nelson ones? i want one or both and not shure if the work is woth it. Nelson looks like a Stealth Glasscannon how can heal much but get hard punished for fire and torps. King Georg V with with 35cm makes me.... scared that i cant can pen... also armor is a big question... I love the scharnhorst guns 28cm with AP but she is fast and has realy good armor and AA and torps ....you see what i meen? i only interrest myself for real ships or ships how realy whant to get build and get canceld not science fiction. (when i whant that i play star trek, dreadnought or samething els... ps dreadnougtht could maybe be samething for you) ps: thx a lot keep up the great job! pps: not my first language
Both iChase and Flamu are stating the heal on this ship (and I would guess the Lion) are expected to get nerfed. I am wonder how much this will change your thoughts on the ship, since it has no way of protecting or spotting ambush torp attacks.
not worried. I have the Montana (pre-buff) and GK and honestly I've never felt overly hurt by lack of overmatch. You just learn to force them to make mistakes and present your belt armor and not your bows, and you will generally eat damage but overcome more often than not. they are banking on one tactic, you can bank on several to counter that.
I feel you. It's even better being a Russian DD player, being able to constantly harrass BBs with HE spam while remaining outside of effective firing range. Gotta love those Russian railguns.
BB players are kinda like the arty players in WoT. Never there when you need them. Always there when you don't. Suffering from false delusions that bigger guns is better. They're first to whine about everything, and no skill is required...
You know i get where you're coming from but droping torpedoes from outside the detection range also takes no skill so you know you better keep that'' BB's take no skill'' comment to yourself.
"looks at my Graf spee (you have torps and big guns) Moral of the story always respect destroyers as those torps are crazy dangerous tottaly agree with you there!"
Hello Notser, what do you think about Yamamoto? In my opinion Yamamoto should have a group benefit. Like when you are in a certain circle around him (or the ship where he is) you get a benefit or a buff like 50% Anti Air, or concealment or -Dispertion +accuracy or Range or or, or. What do you think about that? It should defenately improve Teamplay! Are you probably in contact with the developers?
Yeah... :) that intro really makes me want to take the ship out and play it, besides it sure looks good and... ..... HOLY MOTHER OF FUCDAØ#("CK!!!! 11.1km detection!??
Hey Notser, I'm a loyal fan of yours and I'm about half way to the Friedrich T9 with my Bismarck secondary build and I'm wondering how the Conqueror will stack up against the Freddy/Kurfurst (H-38/H-41 right?) in terms of AA protection and main/secondary strength. Really enjoy your in depth vids and your vast armada. Keep it up and may devestating citadels ever be in your favor :D
I play WoWS like we played Eve Online. I have an NGSI policy (G because WoWS uses Green for friendlies instead of blue). NGSI stands for "Not Green? Shoot It!"
The cool down on the damage control is exactly the same as on the all the other BBs so i don't see why you mentioned it here or on the Nelson as if it was some how longer.
Welp, montana is obsolete now notser. We hoping for some sort of uniqueness for monty, even her AA characteristic been stolen by the kriegs and british. Didnt stop me from playing monty and eat conquerer up, same armor as minatoru i presumed eh
Syukri R.Robert montana is not obsolete. She is the definition of a jack of all trades, good at everything, master of none. I kick ass in the montana. Easily do 120,000 plus damage games consistently, even in bad games. I beat the shit out of a gk at medium long range, double citadeled him and deleted a yamato.
'Treat DDs with the respect they deserve.' 'OMG DDs are so nerfed please WG stop nerfing them. Stop favoring the BBs.' Sorry dude gotta pick one. Not flaming but you gotta decide what is OP and Nerfed and what is not. If a DD is still a credible tactical threat that needs to be removed ASAP before you can push in a BB, it is not nerfed.
Sigma was a Mistake... Imo - can't it just all be the same for each ship type? Ok maybe have it higher for DDs and Cruisers and lower for BBs. But most importantly let it be fixed for each ship type. I mean Ships with Bad Dispersion but high Sigma (higher RNG chance of good salvoes) - make ships more accurate than they really are e.g. Sharnhorst And then Ships with Good Dispersion but low Sigma (lower RNG chance of good salvoes - make ships less accurate than they really are e.g. Hood or Alabama or Amagi. What do you guys think?
Screw the 16" guns, I'm going 18" all the way. The reason I stopped at the Iowa and bought a Missouri is because its just more of the same shit, no point grinding to Tier X on the US BB line. Also why I stopped at the 155mm Mogami, just more of the same shit.
Where the HELL is the Conqueror's Photon torpedoes???? This is supposed to be an 'historically accurate' FANTASY ship!!!! What are they playing at?? And sure the BB's might be harder to spot than CC's but with a Romulan cloaking device (which we all know was invented by that English gay guy genius who broke the Enigma codes) they should be able to get within 50 meters before being spotted, even IF they open up with a full salvo!!
Same here, this whole HMS Monarch with 3x3 15" guns is bullshit though. Should've stuck KGV at Tier VIII with 15" gun upgrade and put HMS Nelson at Tier VII
as I said, 457 can overmatch 30mm but not 32mm, 460mm can overmatch 32mm and 30mm 457mm / 14,3 = 31,9580...mm so 457mm cannones can overmatch maximal 31mm
If you check out the ingame preview it doesn't even have the 419's as a option for some reason.. But yeah I know you loose a barrel, but I bet its worth it.
Okay thank you ! Hey do you mind doing a video on how to account for slow shell velocity? Especially for yamato, even at medium range i find it hard to hit cruisers and some fast battleships because they are faster than ships at tier 6. and i have to get in closer to hit which in turn i get focused. Any quick tips, Its much easier for me to aim in a ship with faster shells for example, a Tirpitz.
Yeah just watch his Dynamic Crosshair Vids. Well common sense with slow shell velocity - you zoom out more to give more lead to the target (it is more accurate with Dynamic) and simply fire away. I've shot dds as far as 16km in it. Dynamic FTW.
playing the operators can possibly help you complete the dunkirk collection?-i have 15 out 16 and 2 duplicates and i really want jack dunkirk and that beautiful flag
while i'm totally hyped for RN BBs (and i'm convinced to roll with the 18" guns even if it's not favorable option, because reasons), there will allways be only one true queen of the oceans :D
Well, go figure... one single tier X battleship that was in the game from the begining, was first (wel, along Izumo maybe) to carry secondaries capable of reaching over 10km, has the biggest guns in game period and as result is the only ship which can lolpen enemy citadels through bow. Not to mention she's currently the only tier X battleship which was actually built in 2 examples (well, three, but Shinano was as incomplete hull reconstructed as CV, so technically she was not the same class afterwards) and up to this day holds the title of biggest, baddest and heaviest battleship ever built. Surely that's enough to qualify her as "queen of the oceans", don't you think?
Eh what... your situational awareness even tells you how many ships are aiming at you, you have way better rate of fire, concealment, even armour on some ships. All you have to do is dodge and shoot all the time! No battleship can beat a good cruiser player, you know? Except the Yamato. -___- Boy do I hate that thing.
Unbelivable so many broadsides on Monty- and not a Single Citadell? With Kurfürst it would be loong exploded (4x Cit) and why did you shoot all the time klick by klick by klick by klick!???? Is that better? i think not.. especially against broadside BBs. A Full DOUBLE Click Salvo is much better and more accurate then.
They already have the highest shell dmg (but only 100 more than Yamy). TBH they need to nerf the Range on 419s to maybe 24-25km while the 457s reach 29.2 - so that it makes more sense.
100 more per shell really isn't enough to make up for having 1 less gun than Yamato. A Yamato broadside is 14,000 higher alpha than a 457-Conqueror broadside. For the 457mm guns to be relevant there would need to be either 10 barrels (make the A and Y turrets triples instead of twins) or a buff to the alpha and the rate of fire. As it stands, the 419mm guns are always a better choice for Conqueror. Or maybe just make the 457mm guns crazy-accurate. Having the range be shorter with with the 419s than the 457s wouldn't really help much, because if you're trying to fight from 29km away you're probably not going to accomplish much.
Well unlike Yamato though - the guns on this ship turn fast yet are accurate, the citadel is hidden deep underwater and the stealth is slightly better. Yamato is forced to fight mid to long ranges nowadays because of her infamous turret traverse. I'm pretty sure the 14k difference won't change a thing as Conquerer will easily target ships unlike Yamato that will struggle. Yeah i wouldnt mind if they made the 457s crazy accurate (it was supposedly 240m i believe until they increased it to 280 like Monty). I mean during WW2 IJN concluded that Dual gun turrets are superior to Triple barelled ones in terms of dispersion when they came to design their A-150s with 2x3 510mm guns. So i wouldn't mind 457mm to heavily rival agaisnt Yamato's 460mm dispersion.
Well about the range reduction for the 419s - I'm not asking for balance reasons - its just a case of common sense lol. I mean the shells are smaller and lighter - so why should it retain the range of the larger heavier shell?
German tech tree: tier IV-VIII - Real ships with unreal upgrades tier IX - paper ship tier X - fantasy ship Methinks brits are OK all things considered...
Pavel Tobiáš the point is that BBS at Tier VIII usually represent european nations capital ships: Bismark, Roma, Richelieu AND KGV. They were historically considered at the same level. Putting the KGV at tier VII makes no sense.
Not really our fault, being a bit strapped for cash having spent the accumulated wealth from 2 centuries of empire building keeping Germans out of France. And the bastards have the cheek to ask for money to leave the EU.
i'm not sure Richelieu will get itself to tier VIII, more probable would be Strasbourg (sister of Dunkerque, had slightly better armor and the same shitty AA suite and 330mm guns) at VI, Richelieu at VII and Alsace at VIII with post-war fantasies in IX and X...
LOL what do expect? USN and RN are more AA focused if anything. IJN - are purely Secondary focused (until KM came along) Now KM - Insane Secondaries and "powerful long range AA" KM BBs in general gets the best of both worlds when it comes to either AA or secondaries.
But unlike high tier IJN USN and RN bbs, KM bbs are known for their shitty dispersion. Hence why they have insane secondaries - as it is really their only other way of reliably dealing dmg in game.
I think we've been playing different ships, my friend. I've played the shit out of both Bismarck and North Carolina (now halfway through Iowa) and I can tell you, its an entirely different story. I've had WAY more success with the KMS BBs. Not only do I completely ignore citadels on me, but the Hydro means I can push smokes, get very early warnings on torpedos. To top it off, anything that gets within 10.6km will have to worry about fires starting every 30 seconds. I feel dirty when playing them because they feel blatantly OP!
Only 2 heals stock and no planes and radar removed? Lower life to start... sounds mediocre. Quirky, but not that great. I realize this sounds like "whine whine, me want I win button", but it's more like "breaking news: weak ship with super heal and uber guns gets fewer heals, no special consumables and the uber guns aren't even that good anyways." Shouldn't we let a ships quirks play out a little before they get nerfed into obscurity?
Conquerer makes Montana looks like shit in terms of DMG Department - with its insane stealth. Unfortunately the 29.2km range - will make retards snipe in this ship while staying far from the fight. When it was made to suprise cruisers at 11.2km Conquerer is perfect atm no need any more buffs - just the slight nerf on the insane heal though - and bam you have yourself a T10 bb - that isn't OP nor UP and actually carriers an independent image amongst other T10 BBs.
Personally I like it... I mean even Yamato could use a 2x3 51cm set up (but that would be game breaking and op). But here is the thing - I would choose 406s over 420s on Kurfurst anyday for it has better reload and better dispersion (apparently). Big guns guns can be a weakness agaisnt cruisers for there will be more chance of overpen. So for Conquerer most people would also choose more guns with smaller caliber for it is a no brainer of firing a heavier broadside - that is less likely to overpen agaisnt ships. Plus Conquerer would instantly suffer in alpha dmg if she only had the 8 457s. Not to mention it cant lol pen like Yamato as well.
That concealment is ridiculous.
*COLONIZE ON SIGHT*
gentleman oni ua-cam.com/video/8Y3JXe1LiX0/v-deo.html
No no, don't scroll down there. Go back up.
Thank you for the Conqueror video Notser, another excellent quality video!
you need to use HE more, I have seen Flamu do 13k HE salvoes
It's massively OP just wait until there are matches 2 or 3 on one team, the super heal will have to be scaled back by about 50%.
One thing is for sure, RN BBs will be the middle finger that Bow on tankers deserve.
Nice job @Notser! Really liking that!!
Holee FUCK that thing is sneaky. Looks like a good choice for covering your DDs and cruisers around cap circles with that speed, British HE and British heals. With the gun choices too she really sounds like a really big but slow Mogami rather than a fast BB. Not sure about that turning radius though, almost CV levels of clunky there.
Very nicely done Notser!
As a BB captain,I ALWAYS fire at DD's when given the chance. A dead DD is a good DD.
Never ignore an opportunity to put shells into an enemy ship in my opinion.
hi, i am great fan from your work,
can you make a video about the king georg V in neer futur?
pleas make it as an tier 7 comparison to the nelson.
is she the work work worh it? feels her armor and alround tankyness
better?
are her guns very bad in compar to the nelson ones?
i want one or both and not shure if the work is woth it. Nelson looks
like a Stealth Glasscannon how can heal much but get hard punished for
fire and torps. King Georg V with with 35cm makes me.... scared that i
cant can pen... also armor is a big question...
I love the scharnhorst guns 28cm with AP but she is fast and has realy
good armor and AA and torps ....you see what i meen?
i only interrest myself for real ships or ships how realy whant to get
build and get canceld not science fiction.
(when i whant that i play star trek, dreadnought or samething els... ps
dreadnougtht could maybe be samething for you)
ps: thx a lot keep up the great job!
pps: not my first language
That fracking intro.... Makes things so epic, keep that up!
I think the Montana's bow shape allows it to tank easier when angled.
I'm excited about the new BB line :-)
Miss these type of vids Notser....
Both iChase and Flamu are stating the heal on this ship (and I would guess the Lion) are expected to get nerfed. I am wonder how much this will change your thoughts on the ship, since it has no way of protecting or spotting ambush torp attacks.
very good game Notser!
Yeah, the accuracy:
Montana's sigma: 1.9
Conqueror's sigma: 2.0
Dispersion is about the same, if not better at the Conqueror.
Don't forget that the Monty gets the Special USN -13% dispersion mod
Yeah, makes playing cruiser even more... äh... fun?
Conks with 457mm guns is basically an 18"gunned Warspite
can't overmatch 32mm with them, but 30mm
not worried. I have the Montana (pre-buff) and GK and honestly I've never felt overly hurt by lack of overmatch. You just learn to force them to make mistakes and present your belt armor and not your bows, and you will generally eat damage but overcome more often than not. they are banking on one tactic, you can bank on several to counter that.
With all the new BBs coming out... It's a good day to be a DD player. So many nooBBs.... And the damn torps can't reload fast enough...
I feel you. It's even better being a Russian DD player, being able to constantly harrass BBs with HE spam while remaining outside of effective firing range. Gotta love those Russian railguns.
BB players are kinda like the arty players in WoT. Never there when you need them. Always there when you don't. Suffering from false delusions that bigger guns is better. They're first to whine about everything, and no skill is required...
You know i get where you're coming from but droping torpedoes from outside the detection range also takes no skill so you know you better keep that'' BB's take no skill'' comment to yourself.
ElectroVeeDub Wouldn't the CVs be the arty, and the BBs be the heavy tanks?
I really wish Notser would stop reminding BB players to shoot at DDs.
"looks at my Graf spee (you have torps and big guns) Moral of the story always respect destroyers as those torps are crazy dangerous tottaly agree with you there!"
I like it. It reminds me of the Montana except it doens't eat as many torps.
Hey, I just played against your Conquerer :) good game!
Correct me if im wrong, but right now it appears like the main guns are 459mm? ......
What do you think about the secondaries on the British BB's? Useful or not?
Do the RN BBs have short AP fuse times like the CLs do or did you just get lucky? you got quite a few penetrations on DDs rather than all overpens.
Nice Video!
(I know that I haven't watched the video yet but it's going to be good anyway, and also I just wanted to write something different than first)
Had my first battle with you Notser. I am Sabot_5. You kill 4 ships in this ship. Got a little distracted. Was fun to watch you
Nice! :)
Hello Notser, what do you think about Yamamoto?
In my opinion Yamamoto should have a group benefit.
Like when you are in a certain circle around him (or the ship where he is) you get a benefit or a buff like 50% Anti Air, or concealment or -Dispertion +accuracy or Range or or, or.
What do you think about that?
It should defenately improve Teamplay!
Are you probably in contact with the developers?
Yeah... :) that intro really makes me want to take the ship out and play it, besides it sure looks good and...
..... HOLY MOTHER OF FUCDAØ#("CK!!!! 11.1km detection!??
Why do Minotaur dont need to aim when shell fly about more than 10 sec. ?
Skill ?
oh look a slightly different montana
Hey Notser, I'm a loyal fan of yours and I'm about half way to the Friedrich T9 with my Bismarck secondary build and I'm wondering how the Conqueror will stack up against the Freddy/Kurfurst (H-38/H-41 right?) in terms of AA protection and main/secondary strength. Really enjoy your in depth vids and your vast armada. Keep it up and may devestating citadels ever be in your favor :D
I play WoWS like we played Eve Online. I have an NGSI policy (G because WoWS uses Green for friendlies instead of blue). NGSI stands for "Not Green? Shoot It!"
Damn I've got some Free XP lying around, not sure if I should spend it on the grind on the tech tree or on the Nelson...
It can be hard hitting those destroyers they are so fast
Has the conqueror only a repair and a heal or will she have more consumebels later?
i have to ask one question does it come with a shield and mace and can i spam shield bash all the time
love your video
Jack Dunkirk has special bonuses?
I know Citizen, He is a great player.
The cool down on the damage control is exactly the same as on the all the other BBs so i don't see why you mentioned it here or on the Nelson as if it was some how longer.
I think it was just to make sure people don't confuse it with Warspite's dmg control.
i was not referring to the heal
Think it's the duration that's worse
Maybe, but for me and probably other players who don't have Warspite he makes it sound like it takes longer to cooldown than other BBs.
In the video it looks to be 15s which is the same as the Germans, better then Japan, and worse then US.
48% fire chance? 12 main battery guns?
Is it just me, or does an HE build actually seem viable?
yuuuuup
flamu said its actually pretty good, had 10- 12k salvos and good fires on bow on targets ofc
It seems that the Conqueror is going to be an extremely popular T10 BB
What's the music
its fun now because people dont know it weak points. after they realize its bigger and easier to hit Izumo, the HE spam will be real :)
Welp, montana is obsolete now notser. We hoping for some sort of uniqueness for monty, even her AA characteristic been stolen by the kriegs and british. Didnt stop me from playing monty and eat conquerer up, same armor as minatoru i presumed eh
Syukri R.Robert montana is not obsolete. She is the definition of a jack of all trades, good at everything, master of none. I kick ass in the montana. Easily do 120,000 plus damage games consistently, even in bad games. I beat the shit out of a gk at medium long range, double citadeled him and deleted a yamato.
'Treat DDs with the respect they deserve.'
'OMG DDs are so nerfed please WG stop nerfing them. Stop favoring the BBs.'
Sorry dude gotta pick one. Not flaming but you gotta decide what is OP and Nerfed and what is not. If a DD is still a credible tactical threat that needs to be removed ASAP before you can push in a BB, it is not nerfed.
I want my MEGAZAO.
Try HE and IFHE?
Sigma was a Mistake... Imo - can't it just all be the same for each ship type?
Ok maybe have it higher for DDs and Cruisers and lower for BBs. But most importantly let it be fixed for each ship type.
I mean
Ships with Bad Dispersion but high Sigma (higher RNG chance of good salvoes) - make ships more accurate than they really are e.g. Sharnhorst
And then Ships with Good Dispersion but low Sigma (lower RNG chance of good salvoes - make ships less accurate than they really are e.g. Hood or Alabama or Amagi.
What do you guys think?
Screw the 16" guns, I'm going 18" all the way. The reason I stopped at the Iowa and bought a Missouri is because its just more of the same shit, no point grinding to Tier X on the US BB line. Also why I stopped at the 155mm Mogami, just more of the same shit.
Oh, the whims of the unwise. Once you play the Montana, you never want to play any other BB. That thing is a BEAST!
419mm equates to 16.5 inch (41.9/2.54= 16.5).
Play Zao. Come back to me and say if they are the same guns as the other 203's in the IJN CA line.
Where the HELL is the Conqueror's Photon torpedoes???? This is supposed to be an 'historically accurate' FANTASY ship!!!! What are they playing at?? And sure the BB's might be harder to spot than CC's but with a Romulan cloaking device (which we all know was invented by that English gay guy genius who broke the Enigma codes) they should be able to get within 50 meters before being spotted, even IF they open up with a full salvo!!
Pls show the kgV
55 shots in the first minute and you only hit 10!! Your biggest enemy is the islands
You waste the 419mm
No plane???
No planes or Radar - but it has that insane heal.
Op as old hell. Nicc
What I'm waiting actually is the king George V
Same here that quad 14" gun turret is interesting want to see how it preforms
Same effect on the Dunkerque.
Same here, this whole HMS Monarch with 3x3 15" guns is bullshit though. Should've stuck KGV at Tier VIII with 15" gun upgrade and put HMS Nelson at Tier VII
Shame it's at the wrong tier and a fantasy ship was given it's correct spot cause reasons apparently...
Antonius Wahyunugroho vanguard should be tier 8
Typical BB logic: Why would I shoot at a DD? He isn't torping me while I sit behind our spawn after all!!! ^__^
Is it even worth getting superintendent if the heal is so strong that you basically won't take enough healable damage anyway?
but the 457mm guns can overmatch 30mm that is the deck and belt armor of a lot of high tier cruisers
No. Only Yamato can do it, that 3mm difference in cannon diameter changes a lot.
Kuhluh is right, the Yamato is the only one that can penetrate 32 mm of thickness,not 30.
Indeed many cruisers have 30 mm deck (Hindeburg).
as I said, 457 can overmatch 30mm but not 32mm, 460mm can overmatch 32mm and 30mm
457mm / 14,3 = 31,9580...mm so 457mm cannones can overmatch maximal 31mm
Is the option for the 457mm gone?
mazgazine1 nop
it's avaible, but you lose one gun per turret
I must have seen the video up just after it was uploaded. for some reason I can't get the video to work over 480p...
If you check out the ingame preview it doesn't even have the 419's as a option for some reason..
But yeah I know you loose a barrel, but I bet its worth it.
Is it really worth it? 12 guns vs 8 guns go a long way....
No manches, soy yo el Missouri Jajajaja, terminamos nas partida juntos jajjaa
Excuse me Notser what site reticle are you using ?
Dynamic
Okay thank you ! Hey do you mind doing a video on how to account for slow shell velocity? Especially for yamato, even at medium range i find it hard to hit cruisers and some fast battleships because they are faster than ships at tier 6. and i have to get in closer to hit which in turn i get focused. Any quick tips, Its much easier for me to aim in a ship with faster shells for example, a Tirpitz.
Yeah just watch his Dynamic Crosshair Vids.
Well common sense with slow shell velocity - you zoom out more to give more lead to the target (it is more accurate with Dynamic) and simply fire away. I've shot dds as far as 16km in it. Dynamic FTW.
Guess I'm selling my Montana because it's literally useless now
HP of T9
But stealth of T9 BBs or T10 Cruisers.
playing the operators can possibly help you complete the dunkirk collection?-i have 15 out 16 and 2 duplicates and i really want jack dunkirk and that beautiful flag
If you're out of duplicates, I don't think you can get him anymore, at least for now.
Where is Vanguard....
Zujia Huang its going to be premium.
british bb? or yamato?
while i'm totally hyped for RN BBs (and i'm convinced to roll with the 18" guns even if it's not favorable option, because reasons), there will allways be only one true queen of the oceans :D
Pavel Tobiáš soooo..... what was your answer again?
Exactly, Warspite. :P
How 2 Facepalm Kurfürst but now seriously I would say Yamato and if you want 4x3 things get the Montana or the GK
Well, go figure... one single tier X battleship that was in the game from the begining, was first (wel, along Izumo maybe) to carry secondaries capable of reaching over 10km, has the biggest guns in game period and as result is the only ship which can lolpen enemy citadels through bow.
Not to mention she's currently the only tier X battleship which was actually built in 2 examples (well, three, but Shinano was as incomplete hull reconstructed as CV, so technically she was not the same class afterwards) and up to this day holds the title of biggest, baddest and heaviest battleship ever built.
Surely that's enough to qualify her as "queen of the oceans", don't you think?
I keep wondering why nations that didn't field anything above 15 in guns in ww2 keep getting paper ships that have larger guns than usn....
Dustin Andersen well the Nelson class battleship had 16 inch guns but I get your point.
Dustin Andersen most nations did field something over 15 inchers..
No radar ?
Nope - thank god.
Hi, i am the Missouri XD
What is her weakness? o.O
Te Ladi VERY vulnerable to HE shell cause everywherr 32mm armour deck
high detectability by planes, less charges on consumables, long cool down on repair, low hit points, slow shell velocity.
Thx!
As someone who only play cruisers i think it's time to stop play at least for a while
Load you're Salt and Pepper shells and cook up some tasty steaks on their decks.
Eh what... your situational awareness even tells you how many ships are aiming at you, you have way better rate of fire, concealment, even armour on some ships. All you have to do is dodge and shoot all the time! No battleship can beat a good cruiser player, you know? Except the Yamato. -___- Boy do I hate that thing.
Repair at 9:00 lol
Next king george V ? :D
Unbelivable so many broadsides on Monty- and not a Single Citadell? With Kurfürst it would be loong exploded (4x Cit) and why did you shoot all the time klick by klick by klick by klick!???? Is that better? i think not.. especially against broadside BBs. A Full DOUBLE Click Salvo is much better and more accurate then.
wp Notser
"Notser, use your Heal. Notser, use your heal. Notser, use your heal"
from about 7:49 to 9:48
Don't worry troll heal.
Tier III-X british bb's?
They need to buff the 457 to make them relevant
They already have the highest shell dmg (but only 100 more than Yamy). TBH they need to nerf the Range on 419s to maybe 24-25km while the 457s reach 29.2 - so that it makes more sense.
100 more per shell really isn't enough to make up for having 1 less gun than Yamato. A Yamato broadside is 14,000 higher alpha than a 457-Conqueror broadside. For the 457mm guns to be relevant there would need to be either 10 barrels (make the A and Y turrets triples instead of twins) or a buff to the alpha and the rate of fire. As it stands, the 419mm guns are always a better choice for Conqueror. Or maybe just make the 457mm guns crazy-accurate.
Having the range be shorter with with the 419s than the 457s wouldn't really help much, because if you're trying to fight from 29km away you're probably not going to accomplish much.
Well unlike Yamato though - the guns on this ship turn fast yet are accurate, the citadel is hidden deep underwater and the stealth is slightly better. Yamato is forced to fight mid to long ranges nowadays because of her infamous turret traverse. I'm pretty sure the 14k difference won't change a thing as Conquerer will easily target ships unlike Yamato that will struggle.
Yeah i wouldnt mind if they made the 457s crazy accurate (it was supposedly 240m i believe until they increased it to 280 like Monty).
I mean during WW2 IJN concluded that Dual gun turrets are superior to Triple barelled ones in terms of dispersion when they came to design their A-150s with 2x3 510mm guns.
So i wouldn't mind 457mm to heavily rival agaisnt Yamato's 460mm dispersion.
Well about the range reduction for the 419s - I'm not asking for balance reasons - its just a case of common sense lol. I mean the shells are smaller and lighter - so why should it retain the range of the larger heavier shell?
It's 24km range, not 29
cool
26.4 sec reload is over the top!
28 sec is more like it...
Or make the Montana's reload 25 sec ;P
Time for a Down the line M8!
Guys no need to get monty any more
RULE BRITANNIA
BRITANNIA RULES THE WAVES
>posted from my Sharia Law Zone
Minotaur is pronounced with a soft i. Like the word minimum.
Drives me nuts hearing you say it with the loud i.
British tech tree:
Tier VIII, IX - Paper Ships
Tier X - Fantasy Ship
Lame.
German tech tree:
tier IV-VIII - Real ships with unreal upgrades
tier IX - paper ship
tier X - fantasy ship
Methinks brits are OK all things considered...
Pavel Tobiáš the point is that BBS at Tier VIII usually represent european nations capital ships: Bismark, Roma, Richelieu AND KGV.
They were historically considered at the same level.
Putting the KGV at tier VII makes no sense.
Just look at the Russian lines... Also the French cruisers
Not really our fault, being a bit strapped for cash having spent the accumulated wealth from 2 centuries of empire building keeping Germans out of France. And the bastards have the cheek to ask for money to leave the EU.
i'm not sure Richelieu will get itself to tier VIII, more probable would be Strasbourg (sister of Dunkerque, had slightly better armor and the same shitty AA suite and 330mm guns) at VI, Richelieu at VII and Alsace at VIII with post-war fantasies in IX and X...
Pls buff Montana again.
they should have put the super yamato at t10 for jp bb.....
Another BB that will get striped down by Cruiser fire !
Too slow in everything!
You havent been playing cruisers, have you?
And I forgot to mention, secondaries are way too short in range!
LOL what do expect? USN and RN are more AA focused if anything.
IJN - are purely Secondary focused (until KM came along)
Now KM - Insane Secondaries and "powerful long range AA"
KM BBs in general gets the best of both worlds when it comes to either AA or secondaries.
But unlike high tier IJN USN and RN bbs, KM bbs are known for their shitty dispersion. Hence why they have insane secondaries - as it is really their only other way of reliably dealing dmg in game.
I think we've been playing different ships, my friend.
I've played the shit out of both Bismarck and North Carolina (now halfway through Iowa) and I can tell you, its an entirely different story.
I've had WAY more success with the KMS BBs.
Not only do I completely ignore citadels on me, but the Hydro means I can push smokes, get very early warnings on torpedos. To top it off, anything that gets within 10.6km will have to worry about fires starting every 30 seconds.
I feel dirty when playing them because they feel blatantly OP!
Only 2 heals stock and no planes and radar removed?
Lower life to start... sounds mediocre. Quirky, but not that great.
I realize this sounds like "whine whine, me want I win button", but it's more like "breaking news: weak ship with super heal and uber guns gets fewer heals, no special consumables and the uber guns aren't even that good anyways."
Shouldn't we let a ships quirks play out a little before they get nerfed into obscurity?
Conquerer makes Montana looks like shit in terms of DMG Department - with its insane stealth.
Unfortunately the 29.2km range - will make retards snipe in this ship while staying far from the fight.
When it was made to suprise cruisers at 11.2km
Conquerer is perfect atm no need any more buffs - just the slight nerf on the insane heal though - and bam you have yourself a T10 bb - that isn't OP nor UP and actually carriers an independent image amongst other T10 BBs.
I really wish they wouldn't have put the 419mm guns on Conqueror, and instead just balanced it around the 457mm guns alone.
Personally I like it... I mean even Yamato could use a 2x3 51cm set up (but that would be game breaking and op). But here is the thing - I would choose 406s over 420s on Kurfurst anyday for it has better reload and better dispersion (apparently). Big guns guns can be a weakness agaisnt cruisers for there will be more chance of overpen. So for Conquerer most people would also choose more guns with smaller caliber for it is a no brainer of firing a heavier broadside - that is less likely to overpen agaisnt ships.
Plus Conquerer would instantly suffer in alpha dmg if she only had the 8 457s. Not to mention it cant lol pen like Yamato as well.
waiting months for nothing thx wg ....
looks very very boring.
cutterbacon BB gameplay usually looks boring... Fun to play, but boring to watch. Unless shit starts going seriously sideways :)
My warspite is in the cap before any dd.That is far from boring.
First