Anyone else notice that @ 1.21 there is an arrow pointing to 'a little white dot' that supposedly moves to 'there' @1.24... however the same 'white dot' is still at the same position where it started. It's the 'little white dot' left and a little up to the one mentioned that actually moves to the new position. Just saying. Great series of videos. Thank you for uploading.
Considering that Sedna, a dwarf planet far, far beyond Pluto, is larger than Pluto and is considered a dwarf planet, it should come as no surprise the Pluto was demoted.
Milt Humason, working with Edwin Hubble made 4 photographic plates in which Pluto appears 11 years before Tombaugh's discovery. Humason and Hubble were working on another project and missed the tiny moving dot in one corner of the plates. So this is the 5th image of Pluto.
@@inevitablecraftslab Indeed 2020 was crazy, so better luck for this year. 2021 may be the year! I can't wait to see what kind of pictures this thing shows us!
Maybe it is due to the much colder environment together with the much lower density of the solar-wind, causing Pluto to have a firmer grasp on its atmosphere. We know that gas-giants in close orbit to their stars, lose their atmospheres as well, since they are being 'cooked' to phenomenal temperatures, so my best guess would be that gravity is not the only determining factor in having an atmosphere.
I wish it could of orbited and studied Pluto more, but maby there's better things past pluto. I asked this question on a few videos and no one seemed to know.
We should launch another space telescope with all of the bells and whistles (infrared, visible, etc.) and place it in a solar sweet spot. Perhaps out of the planetary plane?
Amazing channel. Thanks. Now I'm going to be a bit of an ass so sorry in advance......you incorrectly marked Pluto at 1:13 , in the first image Pluto is actually the dot slightly above and to the left of the one marked with an arrow, and on the second image its slightly above and to the right. Replay the image switch in slow motion and you'll see what I mean. Ps I am not an astronomer I just like to watch youtube videos on the subject.
People "defending" Pluto's `right` to be a planet like if it was a poor kid being bullyied by the bigger planets is really ridiculous. That only demonstrates how stubborn is people when it comes to accept changes.
well that explains a lot. Pluto wobbles around a Center of mass outside of itself. that's a good criteria for a planet designation. Also... if Pluto is made of Methane ice.... it's basically.. a ball of "wax"
They make all the shit up, they don't know, and the earth wobbles around the moon as well. They needed an excuse and you should clearly see their "new parrt of the solar system discovery" is their real excuse, so no matter how many lies and half truths they tell to justify the new politics for funding, they will tell them. I just wish Mr Wizard would rise from the grave and punch them all in the nose. Did you notice when fraudster enabler was tellling us Pluto's orbit is 1.5 times the diameter of Neptunes the stupid lying not to scale circles showed perhaps 20% max orbital size differences - it WAY OFF SCALE and orbits are EXTREMELY ELLIPTICAL and the eggheaded liars DO NOT LIKE SHOWING THE TRUTH, God knows why, it's probably too difficult for them it's much easier to produce a perfect circle and drag the center over a notch then mark the graphic done - although that fraud should be contrasted with the endless hours they spend doctoring up Hubble conglomerate B&W pics into glorious artistic renderings the same paid liar callls beautiful over and over again.
hubble can take a hi res image of galaxys trillions of light years away but can only take a fuzzy blotched image of pluto in our own back yard ? somthings not right there.
What a pity. Furthermore, Pluto has five moons!!! It's just unfair to downgrade this planet ;) I know it's just a matter of opinion among astronomers. That's why I'll aways consider it as a planet!
How could Hubble take such great images like the deep field but the photos of Pluto which is close by in comparison was a blotchy fuzzy mess? I know hubble images go through red green and blue filters and are touched up but they couldn't do that with Pluto?
so let me get this straight, you're comparing a galaxy to a planet? a galaxy which is unimaginably bigger than a planet ( in fact a planet would belong in a galaxy) and some of you would think this is some kind of a foolery?
NASA cannot view Hubble in real time. Just paintings of stars and so called planets. The news is Hubble is fake non-existent. Wow the sun and the moon are local.
I don't like religion, that is why I comment with ridicule, especially when Science offers all the reasons for negating religion. Leave? Your comment leaves much to comprehend.
Hubble needs glasses. It can view galaxies 10 billion light years away but can't clearly see an object in our own Solar System? Reminds me of an elderly lady trying to read without her bifocals.
It's worse than that, they just use a bunch of stoned graphics arists to make all the colorized galaxies and fake super pictures, as it's a make work job for upper middle class near 1% ers - certainly make more than 99% of the pop even though they aren't filthy rich. Government lies and gravy train, as usual.
***** Hjembrent Kent You are both very wrong. Galaxies are small in the night sky but they're actually bigger in our perspective than all of the planets. Look here for some amateur images of galaxies and another section of the forum for their planetary images: stargazerslounge.com/forum/37-imaging-deep-sky/ You'll notice nobody here has imaged pluto. Know why? Jupiter and Saturn are small in the sky but they're also HUGE compared to other planets and expecially pluto. Then take into account pluto is even further away and also smaller than our own moon! Also, a side note: Planets are SO much brighter than galaxies. In the planetary imaging section of that forum you'll see that they use fractions of a second for exposures for planets but 10/20/30 minutes or maybe longer for galaxies or other dso.
***** What do you have up your rear end? So why don't you put your head there, where is seems to belong, and not in this forum of people who have open minds.
Why is this guy so great at giving lectures. He’s one of those teachers that can make boring topics really interesting.
wish i had discovered this channel a long time ago. So much more informative and laymens language so easily understandable. Thank you guys!
Anyone else notice that @ 1.21 there is an arrow pointing to 'a little white dot' that supposedly moves to 'there' @1.24... however the same 'white dot' is still at the same position where it started. It's the 'little white dot' left and a little up to the one mentioned that actually moves to the new position. Just saying.
Great series of videos. Thank you for uploading.
Considering that Sedna, a dwarf planet far, far beyond Pluto, is larger than Pluto and is considered a dwarf planet, it should come as no surprise the Pluto was demoted.
Well now we have the new horizons photos
Dong vat hoang da ₩₩
I can't believe this has received so few views. Great presentation.
The new pics of Pluto are beautiful
Milt Humason, working with Edwin Hubble made 4 photographic plates in which Pluto appears 11 years before Tombaugh's discovery. Humason and Hubble were working on another project and missed the tiny moving dot in one corner of the plates. So this is the 5th image of Pluto.
That's funny, I grew up with it as a planet. I support the dwarf planet categorization though.
its 2015 and New horizons is taking pictures as I type :)
Won't be much longer. :)
It's almost 2020 and We got great pics but the James Webb Telescope is still sitting on earth.
@@adamdonmez879 It's almost 2021 and we had other stuff to do in 2020
@@inevitablecraftslab Indeed 2020 was crazy, so better luck for this year. 2021 may be the year! I can't wait to see what kind of pictures this thing shows us!
Only 3 and half more years to wait!! Woohoo!
Pluto was an 8bit planet! LOL!
Thanks for this excellent video.
yes! i cant wait :D
Thanks again for a great video!
really like this. great shows thanks :)
Maybe it is due to the much colder environment together with the much lower density of the solar-wind, causing Pluto to have a firmer grasp on its atmosphere. We know that gas-giants in close orbit to their stars, lose their atmospheres as well, since they are being 'cooked' to phenomenal temperatures, so my best guess would be that gravity is not the only determining factor in having an atmosphere.
2:49 pluto did kind of dissapear after the year 2000.... *snif*
bye planet pluto!
New horizon photos are amaZing:)
I wish it could of orbited and studied Pluto more, but maby there's better things past pluto. I asked this question on a few videos and no one seemed to know.
We should launch another space telescope with all of the bells and whistles (infrared, visible, etc.) and place it in a solar sweet spot. Perhaps out of the planetary plane?
thank you for this report.
Much obliged.
Amazing channel. Thanks. Now I'm going to be a bit of an ass so sorry in advance......you incorrectly marked Pluto at 1:13 , in the first image Pluto is actually the dot slightly above and to the left of the one marked with an arrow, and on the second image its slightly above and to the right. Replay the image switch in slow motion and you'll see what I mean. Ps I am not an astronomer I just like to watch youtube videos on the subject.
You are absolutely right
Miss you Pluto...
People "defending" Pluto's `right` to be a planet like if it was a poor kid being bullyied by the bigger planets is really ridiculous. That only demonstrates how stubborn is people when it comes to accept changes.
SomeoneCommenting
Really, people say this? :D
I find this new category of drawplanets is much more fitting to objects like Pluto or Ceres.
I m sad, that they had downgreating Pluto to a Pluotonid.
well that explains a lot. Pluto wobbles around a Center of mass outside of itself. that's a good criteria for a planet designation. Also... if Pluto is made of Methane ice.... it's basically.. a ball of "wax"
They make all the shit up, they don't know, and the earth wobbles around the moon as well.
They needed an excuse and you should clearly see their "new parrt of the solar system discovery" is their real excuse, so no matter how many lies and half truths they tell to justify the new politics for funding, they will tell them.
I just wish Mr Wizard would rise from the grave and punch them all in the nose.
Did you notice when fraudster enabler was tellling us Pluto's orbit is 1.5 times the diameter of Neptunes the stupid lying not to scale circles showed perhaps 20% max orbital size differences - it WAY OFF SCALE and orbits are EXTREMELY ELLIPTICAL and the eggheaded liars DO NOT LIKE SHOWING THE TRUTH, God knows why, it's probably too difficult for them it's much easier to produce a perfect circle and drag the center over a notch then mark the graphic done - although that fraud should be contrasted with the endless hours they spend doctoring up Hubble conglomerate B&W pics into glorious artistic renderings the same paid liar callls beautiful over and over again.
*****
shit he's mad...
***** Obviously a science denier. ***** wouldn't know the "truth" if it hit him/her (probably a him) in the face. Science can give some answer.
HJR
Perhaps the problem is your low IQ. Thus the truth is, you haven't a clue, and can be lied to with impunity, you wouldn't know the diffference.
***** Of course you are entitled to your opinion. We will just ignore the raving of a person like you.
Why hello there Pluto!
i grew up with pluto as a plant
@Pluto:is awesome👏😋😉
mics still in distortion
hubble can take a hi res image of galaxys trillions of light years away but can only take a fuzzy blotched image of pluto in our own back yard ? somthings not right there.
syntaxmirror237 stupidity in a nutshell
I know right
Actually...Pluto did eventually disappear in a sense....It's not a planet anymore.... :D
Is it me seeing no difference between two images
What a pity. Furthermore, Pluto has five moons!!! It's just unfair to downgrade this planet ;) I know it's just a matter of opinion among astronomers. That's why I'll aways consider it as a planet!
Pluto !! Not a dwarf :))
How could Hubble take such great images like the deep field but the photos of Pluto which is close by in comparison was a blotchy fuzzy mess? I know hubble images go through red green and blue filters and are touched up but they couldn't do that with Pluto?
Deep field objects are significantly larger than Pluto and also emit their own light.
so let me get this straight, you're comparing a galaxy to a planet? a galaxy which is unimaginably bigger than a planet ( in fact a planet would belong in a galaxy) and some of you would think this is some kind of a foolery?
NASA cannot view Hubble in real time. Just paintings of stars and so called planets. The news is Hubble is fake non-existent. Wow the sun and the moon are local.
Brought to us by Science, not by religion, which is nothing offering nothing.
James Jordan STFU douch nozzle
Wow, was that your comment or your non-existent god?
this video has nothing to do with religion, if you dont like it, leave
I don't like religion, that is why I comment with ridicule, especially when Science offers all the reasons for negating religion. Leave? Your comment leaves much to comprehend.
religion is holding the structure together that allows Hubble to exist you idiot
Just add Gaussian blur. How much did they charge for this shit lol
And now we're past pluto gaining on the kuiper belt
Hubble needs glasses. It can view galaxies 10 billion light years away but can't clearly see an object in our own Solar System? Reminds me of an elderly lady trying to read without her bifocals.
It's more to do with light bouncing off pluto theres very little while a galaxy has much more light.
Galaxies tend to be brighter than planets
It's worse than that, they just use a bunch of stoned graphics arists to make all the colorized galaxies and fake super pictures, as it's a make work job for upper middle class near 1% ers - certainly make more than 99% of the pop even though they aren't filthy rich. Government lies and gravy train, as usual.
***** Hjembrent Kent
You are both very wrong. Galaxies are small in the night sky but they're actually bigger in our perspective than all of the planets. Look here for some amateur images of galaxies and another section of the forum for their planetary images: stargazerslounge.com/forum/37-imaging-deep-sky/
You'll notice nobody here has imaged pluto. Know why? Jupiter and Saturn are small in the sky but they're also HUGE compared to other planets and expecially pluto. Then take into account pluto is even further away and also smaller than our own moon!
Also, a side note: Planets are SO much brighter than galaxies. In the planetary imaging section of that forum you'll see that they use fractions of a second for exposures for planets but 10/20/30 minutes or maybe longer for galaxies or other dso.
***** What do you have up your rear end? So why don't you put your head there, where is seems to belong, and not in this forum of people who have open minds.
Pluto is just a Mickey Mouse planet.
wrong dot, revier please
yep noticed that as well, the dot was still there on the second picture
wow...is a planet? I thot it was a dog.... :D
It’s blurry wtf fake stuff this telescope can see the end of the universe and Pluto is blurry
The newly donned "non planet" has 3 moons.... just goes to show that even science has now gone insane in modern America.
lacks subs
Lies Lies Lies Fake Fake Fake
And Pluto has fleas.
Dum dum dum dum dum