I've never clicked on anything so fast in my life. Thank you so much for the upload :-) Do you plan on uploading more content in the future, or are these more one-off videos?
@@_jhc Yeah I though you might say something like that. I understand, thank you for all you've uploaded! I feel I really get a lot out of your discussions.
Well put it this way. Before you came up with the supposed a-priori argument of "In order to justify anything you have to presuppose it was justified", Rem still would need to be able to come to that conclusion FIRST and therefore literally anything he thought of before that moment must have been irrational and/or unjustified. He can't reasonably say he was born with that magical proposition encoded into his brain due to some nessesary fact about how minds operate. It just seems like you're running into the problem of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy, or that you were just firing blindly in the dark before that moment. Which seems less reasonable than saying "I had a lesser degree of confidence in my knowledge yesterday than I do today". Again. It's not saying there is no justification. It's just saying that we're operating on the basis that we're just believing these things are the way they are until either proven otherwise, or we find something better. It's not pulling ourselves out of the swamp by our own hair. It's hanging onto a log which might sink at any time whilst we try and find a bigger log, or a vine with which to pull ourselves out. So each shit Munchaussen trillema.
at the beginning they described Moral realism wrong. Destiny is a cognitivist, but he is a moral anti realist. I’d just define destiny as a Individual Subjectivist or Moral Error Theorist. Cognitivism being that ethical sentences express propositions and that they are true or false. Moral Antirealism being that opposite of moral realism. So that there are no objective moral features of the world.
these guys offer the worst books to start off reading in philosophy...that's how to put people off. kant, plato, descartes are for the fanboys. just read good general introductions and online philosophy encyclopedias...and absolutely stay away from any of the frankfurters
>solipsism is compatible with moral realism If someone's realism is "compatible with solipsism" there's no reason to even discuss it, that's a completely vacuous statement.
Never subbed so fast to a channel. I've been really disheartened to witness the 'philosophy' that people communicate in Destiny's community. I was hoping to have a conversation with you, on or off stream as you seem to have a solid grasp of philosophy's limitations and don't resort to an over extension as I've seen regularly from people like Rem. I'm on Destiny's discord, have posted on reddit and I consider myself a layperson when it comes to this particular field. My goal is to have a better and more charitable understanding of it by bouncing the conclusions I've drawn and seeing how it compares in relation to your experience.
_jhc is my favourite philosopher from the Destiny Cinematic Universe.
"Watch two ContraPoints videos and call me in the morning." Best part about this entire conversation
I have to revisit this saga once every 3 months
jhc is so cute
0___0
So hyped for this
i love it when you slay rem
jhc please make this a habit. Also please make subtle stabs at Rem.
I've never clicked on anything so fast in my life. Thank you so much for the upload :-)
Do you plan on uploading more content in the future, or are these more one-off videos?
im way too lazy and frankly important to create content
@@_jhc Yeah I though you might say something like that. I understand, thank you for all you've uploaded! I feel I really get a lot out of your discussions.
@@GIFT1FROM1THE1GODZ come on discord and hmu
My girl
Thanks for existing. Also, have you ever spoke to malpass about this ?
i love malpass but he is a dreamer
The Irony of saying that jhc’s position is extreme.
Can you explain the irony?
Arbiter The irony is that he’s extremely cautious, making virtually zero strong claims.
JHC is like Destiny's Mahoraga
had to google that
come back
i got bullied off the internet
You’re actually adorable
_jch and the olive eating french guy are just awesome!
Was this the video where you talked about your political views? I thought it was but I skimmed around and can't find it
EDIT: nvm 1:04:30
dont remember but you can just come on discord and ask me
If I come to L.A. can you get me shrooms?
Well put it this way. Before you came up with the supposed a-priori argument of "In order to justify anything you have to presuppose it was justified", Rem still would need to be able to come to that conclusion FIRST and therefore literally anything he thought of before that moment must have been irrational and/or unjustified. He can't reasonably say he was born with that magical proposition encoded into his brain due to some nessesary fact about how minds operate.
It just seems like you're running into the problem of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy, or that you were just firing blindly in the dark before that moment. Which seems less reasonable than saying "I had a lesser degree of confidence in my knowledge yesterday than I do today".
Again. It's not saying there is no justification. It's just saying that we're operating on the basis that we're just believing these things are the way they are until either proven otherwise, or we find something better. It's not pulling ourselves out of the swamp by our own hair. It's hanging onto a log which might sink at any time whilst we try and find a bigger log, or a vine with which to pull ourselves out. So each shit Munchaussen trillema.
"You can't start investigating these problems without reading philosophy"
Well how the epic loving shit did the first philosopher do it then?
Love me some _jhc
You're entertaining to listen to. You just shit on people while being a badass.
Cruickshank Place
at the beginning they described Moral realism wrong. Destiny is a cognitivist, but he is a moral anti realist. I’d just define destiny as a Individual Subjectivist or Moral Error Theorist. Cognitivism being that ethical sentences express propositions and that they are true or false. Moral Antirealism being that opposite of moral realism. So that there are no objective moral features of the world.
Mueller Pike
Oh it's a shame on the philosophy server there was such heat x(
oop
these guys offer the worst books to start off reading in philosophy...that's how to put people off. kant, plato, descartes are for the fanboys. just read good general introductions and online philosophy encyclopedias...and absolutely stay away from any of the frankfurters
Jhc sounds like Mark proksh
this vid didnt show up in my sub feed youtubes fuckin ya
12:58
15:20
>solipsism is compatible with moral realism
If someone's realism is "compatible with solipsism" there's no reason to even discuss it, that's a completely vacuous statement.
1800-ring-a-ding -my-dingaling realism isn’t the same as moral realism. Moral realism is just that there are moral facts.
Never subbed so fast to a channel. I've been really disheartened to witness the 'philosophy' that people communicate in Destiny's community. I was hoping to have a conversation with you, on or off stream as you seem to have a solid grasp of philosophy's limitations and don't resort to an over extension as I've seen regularly from people like Rem. I'm on Destiny's discord, have posted on reddit and I consider myself a layperson when it comes to this particular field. My goal is to have a better and more charitable understanding of it by bouncing the conclusions I've drawn and seeing how it compares in relation to your experience.
Didn't you imply Rem was shielding paedophiles from the authorities?
Are you still around? You are amazing. Please tell me you’re vegan as well you’d be the perfect human
hey and yes