Water Rights | Real Estate Exam Prep Videos

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лип 2024
  • Water rights is a big part of a property owners estate. A land owners' water rights depends largely on the state the property is located in, the body of water in question, and the particular legal doctrine the state employs.
    Key real estate terms you should know once you've completed this video:
    (1) Riparian Rights - Rights of a land owner to use waters of an adjacent river or stream
    (2) Littoral Rights - Rights of a landowner who's property borders a lake or the ocean
    (3) Doctrine of Prior Appropriation - The first owner or user has the rights to divert water for their use.
    Best of luck with your studies...
    ✅ Subscribe for more FREE tips on how to do UA-cam better:
    ua-cam.com/users/therealestate...
    ➡️Have you seen my latest video:
    • Real Property Rights |...
    🛑Recommended Videos
    How to Calculate Property Taxes
    • Real Estate Math Video...
    💕My Most Watched Videos:
    Real Estate Agent Bookkeeping Spreadsheet - Updated for 2020
    • Real Estate Agents Boo...
    👉 The Real Estate Agent's Business Plan Template:
    • (Part 1) Real Estate A...
    You can find me hanging out most days on Facebook!
    Facebook: / therealestateclassroom
    New real estate exam prep videos uploaded 2-3x per week to students pass their real estate exam. Feel free to leave a comment, suggestion, or questions asked in the comment section.
    Email me: PaulVojchehoske@gmail.com
    Paul Vojchehoske
    Mr. Real Estate Seminars, Inc.
    The Real Estate Classroom
    P. O. Box 540725
    Omaha, NE 68154
    (402) 660-0395
    This description may contain affiliate links to products we enjoy using ourselves. Should you choose to use these links, this channel may earn affiliate commissions at no additional cost to you. We appreciate your support!
    P.S. Nothing in this video shall be construed as legal or financial advice and is for INFORMATIONAL purposes only! Please consult with a competent attorney, financial advisor, and your broker before implementing anything you’ve learned from this video. Likewise, the issues discussed herein may not be applicable in your state or local jurisdiction.
    Cheers,
    Paul Vojchehoske

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @TheRealEstateClassroom
    @TheRealEstateClassroom  4 роки тому +5

    More study materials at TheRealEstateClassroom.com

    • @MA-jx6yq
      @MA-jx6yq 2 роки тому +2

      Your water rights are about to be stolen by your state's politicians!
      ua-cam.com/video/o8qInSgI6Ss/v-deo.html

  • @RiskOnTrading
    @RiskOnTrading 8 місяців тому +1

    Hey , Just wanted to say thank you for sticking so closely to the information taught at schools. Your videos seem like an add on to the school im at

  • @gillianperkins4946
    @gillianperkins4946 4 роки тому +3

    Water rights are a real big issue in places like Wyoming.

  • @crystalkosnjek
    @crystalkosnjek 12 днів тому

    The Missouri river devided the boundary of Nebraska and Iowa.. The river has since changed course after a flood so now a part of Iowa is west of the Missouri.

  • @NebraskaLandlord
    @NebraskaLandlord 4 роки тому +4

    You should do a video on rent prorations.

  • @suzil5504
    @suzil5504 6 місяців тому

    Clearest explanation out there 👍

  • @stephaniedblendo1081
    @stephaniedblendo1081 4 роки тому +1

    I worked for the Army Corp of Eng. for many years and there were always laws suits between us and states regarding this very issue.

  • @dannygeed8350
    @dannygeed8350 4 роки тому +3

    I had a question on my test the read something like: A rancher lives in a state that receives very little rainfall and placed restriction on water useage giving priority to household use. Which type of doctrine of water rights does this state follow? It gave like 4 choices doctrine of littoral, doctrine of raparian, the right of avulsion and one other choice. Im paraphrasing the question but the prime details I remember.

  • @janessajohn3085
    @janessajohn3085 2 роки тому +2

    I live in France and you can also own the water like in California

  • @emimcelhinny9837
    @emimcelhinny9837 7 місяців тому

    You're amazing

  • @1horton3
    @1horton3 3 роки тому +1

    So as a buyer under the riparian system, acreage includes land underwater ? Would I have to pay for boundaries extending out to the middle of the lake of my lakefront property ?

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  3 роки тому +1

      I really depends on how the specific property. In some cases your property line would extend does extend to the center of the lake assuming another owner borders the lake as well. In other cases it's common for your boundry line to end at the high weater mark and the association you live in owns the lake. But... for sure you want to know the details before you list the property for sale :o)

    • @mea425copyrightlicensing4
      @mea425copyrightlicensing4 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheRealEstateClassroom thank you for your response. To be more clear with my question, as a buyer I want to know if I am paying on acreage that is underwater. I am east of the MS river. Is it standard practice or either not allowed to advertised a property as 2 acres when only 1 acre is dry land and the other is underwater?

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  3 роки тому

      @@mea425copyrightlicensing4 Based on the info from your question... under the littoral rights docutrine (which governs lakes) the general rule is yes, if you're purchasing 10 acres and 1 of the 10 is a pond... you're purchasing the ground under the water. As far as advertising, that depends on each states specifc rule and each state is different. I would call your states real estate commission or board and ask about the advertising rules. now...if the property line crosses the lake or pond... Each property owner owns the land under the water up to the boundry line. No one owns the water and each would have equal use of the whole lake or pond.

  • @felipegonzalez9166
    @felipegonzalez9166 2 роки тому +2

    If Tom sells his property does Sally now have ownership of the water in a Doctrine of prior appropriation state or does the ownership of the water transfer with the property?

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  2 роки тому +3

      In a doctrine of prior appropriation state water rights transfer with title

    • @pn3940
      @pn3940 2 роки тому

      I think the ownership comes with the sale.

  • @christiensebastien2442
    @christiensebastien2442 9 місяців тому +1

    Not sure if this is just Florida when it comes to littoral rights, but I remember in my course that the property ends at the median watermark. Is this something that changes by state?

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  9 місяців тому +1

      Yes. You would need to know that for the state portion of your exam!

    • @RiskOnTrading
      @RiskOnTrading 8 місяців тому +1

      Copy Paste From Colorado Course -
      Riparian Rights: (Along a running flow of water)
      Along a NAVIGABLE river, (commercial traffic) one owns to the water's edge.
      Along a NON-NAVIGABLE stream, one owns the land to the center of the stream. (Someone else owns the water.)
      Littoral Rights: (Along a stationary body of water)
      Along large NAVIGABLE lakes and oceans, one owns to the average high water mark.
      Doctrine of Prior Appropriation:
      A theory of water law that gives preferential right to use water to the first party to divert it for a beneficial use. The doctrine is based on the premise that there is not enough water available to assign equal shares to every potential user.Prior Appropriation sets up water use priorities and relies on adjudication of water rights by special water courts.
      This doctrine is prevalent in the Southwest United States, generally along the Colorado and Rio Grande Rivers.
      A state's government can give permission to a non-adjacent land owner for crop IRRIGATION and other uses.

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  8 місяців тому +1

      Thank you @@RiskOnTrading

  • @tscott23
    @tscott23 3 роки тому +1

    What if Sally owned was the first property owner but the water way is clearly coming from Tom's end. Could she stop him from using the water? And if so. How when the water is coming from his side of the property? Can you elaborate more on that please :)

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  3 роки тому +2

      If Sally and Tom live in a state that recognizes Riparian Rights, then no one owns the water so even though Tom owns the land under the water he could not deprive Sally of the water. He could not divert it, restrict it's flow, etc. If they live in a state that recognizes the Doctrine of Prior Appropriation, Tom could divert or restrict the flow depriving Sally of the water. Why? Because in those states, Tom owns the water and the land under the water. If Tom's property is in a Riparian state and Sally lives in a Doctrine of Prior Appropriation state.... meaning their property line is also on the state line.... we have a law suit :o)

    • @tscott23
      @tscott23 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheRealEstateClassroom thanks

    • @pn3940
      @pn3940 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheRealEstateClassroom the question was if Sally owned the water first. Question is can Sally even own the water upstream from her?

  • @pn3940
    @pn3940 2 роки тому +1

    sounds like Doc of Prior App is meaningless. Sally can still use that water without Tom's approval, since Tom owns it?

  • @angelaorin6434
    @angelaorin6434 3 роки тому +1

    I don't quite understand the difference between Riparian rights and Doctrine of prior appropriation?

    • @TheRealEstateClassroom
      @TheRealEstateClassroom  3 роки тому +2

      The biggest difference between the two doctrines are: who owns the water and who has priority over it's use. For example, under Riparian, no one owns the water and everyone has equal right to use. If the water runs over someones private property, tyhe owner can't deprive his own stream neighbors of it. Under Prior Appropriation, the up stream owner actually owns the water and can divert it or deprive his downstream neighbors of it for his benefit... such as water his cows or watering his crops.