I could not agree more. I had never heard that ridiculous argument before. NASA is now claiming their engineers created a battery powered waving mechanism for the flag, and never told anybody about it. How far will they go to fool people?
The flag was an upside down L you twats lmao look at the very last clip of the video when its shaking, you can clearly see theres a support beam extruding 90 degrees from the top of the centre post lol. & also if you listened carefully you would have actually heard her say “They engineered a flag to LOOK like it was moving in a breeze” Lol back to school little boi
Why is that stupid.? The flagpole is an inverted L . There's still gravity on the moon and no wind to make the flag wave. So it'll just hang down if there's no support on the upper side. Don't you want the flag to be identified as the american flag in the pictures.? Why is that stupid.? Otherwise it'll just be seen as a cloth hanging down from a pole in the pictures.
@@DeputyNordburg i know for a fact the moon landing was fake. Ive seen ufos before and they've been around since 1930. Going to the moon would've been of no issue and they wouldn't have used a rocket or anything like that. Its all a hoax
50 years back the moon landers were landing with couple of humans in it so smoothly n successfully each time, but 50 years after that when technologies have way advanced than that time, the world is struggling to land moon landers. Isn't this quite unbelievable by itself!!!
Yes that want i think 😂, but some blind follow idiots still believes that nasa moon landing is real😂, my question is that without launchpad how they lift up from the moon surface even in modern time they don't know how to do that and the another question is that how they docked the lunar module to command module without the proper technologies 😂, it's a ridiculous 😂
Because space is hard, it's not that easy. Even after doing all calculations and simulations, things could still go wrong. And also not all space agencies of countries have enough resources compared to NASA. One big reason why NASA hasn't sent humans back to the moon for so many years is becoz of budget. In the 1960s , the USA and Soviet Union were basically doing a race to reach the moon first. And also there was a lot public interest. Due to that the government had given huge budget to NASA. It was like as if the government was giving NASA a infinite stream of money. Therefore huge progress was made in very little time and we managed to land on the moon. Several Apollo missions were conducted. But after a while public interest went down, and America had other problems to deal with, so NASA's budget was reduced. It was getting very expensive to send missions to moon and the science u got back was very little. Instead u could send rovers and landers on moon which will be much more cheap, require a smaller rocket, and will be much productive than sending humans. Also modifying a Saturn V with modern equipment is not that easy, to change one thing they will need to change another and so on. Also there was no point doing the same exact mission which we already have achieved. We needed much more efficiency
Also some like to say why didn't they have many failures and how come all missions were so successful. Yes they had many failures before, there was one where 3 astronauts died alive during a fire, and it was only after several missions, it was Apollo *11* which finally got humans to the moon. Also the Apollo 13 was nearly a disaster but they managed to bring them back home safely. I don't want to waste much time so here's a analogy This u can compare to Airplane and car accidents. According to statistics there are more car accidents every year than plane accidents, plane crashes are extremely rare. From watching all those plane crash investigation videos it might seem there are a lot of plane crashes when actually it's not true. Planes are actually the safest mode of transport.
Moon landing was definitely a Hoax which many people believed to be true just because NASA told them and also because of those famous videos of flag hoisting on Moon and astronauts walking and jumping on Moon! Note the dates of those 6 Moon landings:- 1st Crewed Moon landing - 20 July 1969 2nd Crewed Moon landing - 14 Nov 1969 3rd Crewed Moon landing - 31 Jan 1971 4th Crewed Moon landing - 26 July 1971 5th Crewed Moon landing - 16 Apr 1972 6th Crewed Moon landing - 07 Dec 1972 So, NASA sent successfully 6 Crewed Moon mission within 3.5 years !!! But it didn't try to send another in last 50 years! Now someone will say these missions are costly so they didn't do it again. Oh come on! They had money to do 6 missions within 3.5 years but not enough money for one more mission even in 50 years! This shows that NASA is hiding something. They created fake Moon landing pictures with help of filmmaker Stanley Kubrick. Stanley himself confessed his involvement in fake Moon landing. NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. 200,000 magnetic tapes recording were destroyed. How this happened? Were NASA scientists not smart enough to save those tapes and real videos from getting damaged? They intentionally destroyed everything because there was no original Moon landing video in those cassettes ! If Moon landing was so easy in 1969-72 then many other countries like Russia, Japan, India should have been able to launch atleast one successful Crewed Moon mission! But no country has done it yet despite so much advancement in science and technology! Just compare the technology of 1969 (when there was no mobile, no laptops, no internet, no 4G, 5G) with today's advance technology. US could do 6 successful Moon landing within 3.5 years with that old technology but the world can't do even 1 successful Moon landing with modern technology. The knowledge of today's scientists about space, universe, rocket science is definitely more than those scientists of 1969 but still today's scientists can't make 1 successful Crewed Moon landing! This creates serious doubts in mind about NASA moon landings! Russia, Japan, Israel, Europe, India find it difficult to land a satellite safely on Moon even in today's time. India successfully landed its "Chandrayan 3" lunar craft on 23rd August 2023 on South pole of Moon and it was considered a big achievement by whole world. India failed in 2019 and Russia's Luna 25 also failed in 21 August 2023! Just landing of a satellite on Moon is so difficult even in 2023 with so much advancement in science and technology, how can NASA sent 6 successful Crewed Moon landing mission within 3.5 years !!!! This is highly doubtful. Going to Moon can be very challenging and returning to Earth safely can be even more challenging! In my opinion Moon landing was a HOAX !!
Didn't even watch it - but the comments are great. Of course there's no moon - it's someone up there with a torch just being a bloody nuisance while we're trying to sleep. Probably one of those UFO guys.
I just ask a few things, if the man reached the moon in 1969; Why haven't other countries reached the moon so far, whereas today's mobile technology is ten times that time, and after that, why didn't NASA send another human to the moon.
The two areas of technology are unrelated in any way. Your comment is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read, at no point in your rambling incoherent response were you close to anything resembling a rational thought the internet is now dumber for having it I award you no points.
look you just give me the one answer that till now why other countries astronaut did not reach or send to the moon. and please don't tell me that it's too expensive.
@@robinmishr First question answered: Other countries have no reason to go to the moon after the space race Second question answered: America has no reason to go to the moon after the space race
With the technology of the 60's I have a hard time believing they landed on the moon and came back. If it was so successful getting there today wouldn't be such an issue
Nilesh Kumar Routray only time humans have did something & never did it again is when they failed.... money has nothing to do with going back if they really went but you won’t understand that point of view just the view you were forced to believe
@ nasa has said as soon as they find a way to get past the van hellen belt we will go back,NOT. use logic if there is a van hellen belt now there was one in 1969!!!!
@@williamhutton1752 um william do u realize its NASa thats has stated as soon as we figure how to get past those belts we will go back to the moon . lol obviously you have stock in NASA. hope you lost a lot in game stock :)
Its not hard going back...its expensive and innificient and doesnt serve nuch monetary gain The technology needed to fake it at the time would have been EVEN MORE advanced because the parralele shadows cant be replicated using stage lighting
I have a couple technical questions. According to NASA the surface of the moon where the Apollo missions landed was approx. 250 degrees F. Since the landers were made of aluminum which like all metals conducts heat how did they keep the LEM cool? How did they keep it from expanding, warping, popping seams welds and joints? How did they keep the interior cool, the electronics from frying and the crew from cooking? Same story for the cameras. They weren't specially insulated from what I can tell and they were also made of mostly heat conducting metal. And what about the film? What kept it from melting or at least being badly damaged? Did NASA develop some special super duper ultra high temp film?
Good luck with that, like the knowledgeable IQ man above it is moslty sentiment. The ploy is being 'Morning' the surface was not heated up yet. Used a lot of tinfoil technology. Unlike the Command Module that rotated it had to have airconditioning. Cameras litely modified; no fluids and reflective paint... have faith my man. Edit note: For the very knowledgeable (anal) Seers >> It’s *aluminum* foil. (well not really really >> mylar foil!)😜
@@narajuna Since the LEM was on the surface for over 24 hrs. the "morning" ploy goes away. I've also been told 250degrees F. in space isn't the same as on earth, micrometeroite shielding protected them (couldn't even find that anywhere). The miracle reflective foil which only covered the engine compartment not the crew comp. They try. Oh how they try.
@@cromlaughsatyourfourwinds8333 Now you are being unknowledgeable; nasa science says a daytime last over 700 hrs. Heat is worst thou, no gasses to dispate heat like here. It is freezing in the shadows, perhaps an open window?
@@cromlaughsatyourfourwinds8333 _"Since the LEM was on the surface for over 24 hrs. the "morning" ploy goes away."_ Why? A day on the Moon is 392 hours. A sidereal day is 700 hours (28 days). So it's a fact that the lunar surface didn't heat to max temperature. The thermal conductivity of lunar regolith is quite low. Also, the landings legs were insulated. NASA has a full on report on the thermal effects on the landing legs (from surface and exhaust), and in fact, that was the first thing Buzz Aldrin commented on. Mylar and Kapton reflects a lot of IR radiation away, and retains a lot of heat. This prevents the LM from overheating. MLI is used on the ISS, and many other satellites. The spacecraft is kept cool by radiators and sublimators. The Kapton covered the crew compartment too. It's just hidden by the Micrometeoroid shields (whipple shields). A lot of engineering went into the design of the Apollo TV camera. The film didn't melt because it was insulated by a vacuum. Apollo is not the only time film cameras were used in space. High Altitude Reconnaissance aircraft, and Reconnaissance satellites use it too.
The Americans were losing badly in Vietnam, plus other problems. Could the moon landings have been a diversion and did we really have the necessary technology in 1969 ???
Yes* and yes. The primary reasons for the moon landings was to develop ballistic weapons technology, and explore the moon for military applications. But the goodwill and diversion from the Vietnam war were certainly secondary reasons to do it.
we had a lot in 1969. that was the era of modernization of militaries, ballistic missiles, improvements of computers and you guessed it, rocketry. the things we have now are just more modernized versions of what we had back then. except like cellphones or stealth technology.
I place my belief in the Bible over individuals who are always untruthful. Landing on the moon is not possible. I agree with you. At that time, technology was limited and even now, no one ventures to the moon.
The video Apollo 11 used radiated away because of the Sun. Yes, the footage of the first space mission is fake, but that doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen. I actually want to discuss this with someone, so if anyone believes that the moon landing didn’t happen, I’m happy to rationalize our thoughts.
Who are the explanations coming from.and why? Not NASA,NASA has never addressed the hoax, except to Tweet "Yes we did " in response to an NBA star questioning Apollo program valdity.It is you alone that should know. Yes, we landed on the Moon. Science doesn't lie, people lie.
@@TheDeepState2001 You can't fix stupid. For anyone [especially Americans] to be chasing Alice after 50 years, is just ignorance on their part. Libraries are free.
@@jake4243 nah you wouldn't. Their mind is already made up. I would however, like to know their best "proof" for their claim. I'm sure it's nothing new. It never is with these people.
I wonder why they didn't make it again. Something suspicious. If they were able to make it to the moon 50 years ago, why not again yet with the modern technology? While SpaceX is capable to work and succeed on Mars Mission, why not they do for Moon then? There is a lot of questions as such to be asked.
There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972. 6 missions landed on the moon. 2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander. So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions. Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon. 1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before. 2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design. 3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon. 4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.
@@luchalew2884 Go watch it again they land on the moon and it is completely unconvincing in every way. Hell he couldn't even keep the phases of the moon straight
Big FACTS Lucha, even though NOBODY HAS DEFINITIVE PROOF, at least you got your thinking cap on... Hell they were playing the theme music from 2001: Space Odessey, on the recorded flight of NASA Odessey for the LM-7 mission... And they played the song " Age of Aquarius" , like smeared it in our face and said nannanna boo boo, stick your head in doo doo... At least your aware of the guys name Most moon believers never heard of the guy.
Elon want to make something so lower and middle class can go to the Moon, but Neil Armstrong is fighting against him... he was in tears... starting to make people believe they never travel to the moon, and fear if we go will know the truth...
Facts about the moon surface: Temperatures that range from 140 °C (284 F) down to −171 °C (-275.8 F), an atmospheric pressure of 10−10 Pa (basically no atmosphere), and high levels of ionizing radiation from the Sun and cosmic rays (way more than the Van Allen belts). It has an atmosphere so tenuous as to be nearly vacuum. It's surface is pelted daily by extreme amounts of space debris, with no protection as the Earth's atmosphere provides. Yet, these men traveled at mach 20, in a space craft with walls in some places no thicker than aluminum foil, over a quarter of million miles through space (realize, a BB sized space rock hitting it would have been devastating) and not only land on the moon, but the suits these astronauts wore somehow protected them from the aforementioned extreme conditions. Huh yeah, ok....*smh
The EASEP science package deployed on the surface by Apollo 11 recorded temperatures as high as 150°F (66°C) and as low as -63°F (-53°C). These temperatures were recorded via remote measurement of the nearby soil radiance.
Yup. It was so easy to do back in the late sixties. People in that era were more trusting in the news sources. They didn't question like in our era now.
I wonder how hard it is to "engineer" a flagpole to make it look like its wavering in the wind... They make things sound more complicated and technical than they really are.
@@luisforeal8676 Exactly the flag was designed for ease of assembly while wearing a pressurized spacesuit which limited the range of motion and manual dexterity of the astronauts. Horizontal crossbars kept the flag extended as if it was caught in a breeze.[Vacuum environment ] That's it. Oh, we can't forget the heat. The flags were carried on the outside of the Apollo Lunar Module (LM), most of them on the descent ladder inside a thermally insulated tubular case to protect them from exhaust gas temperatures calculated to reach **2,000 °F (1,090 °C) in the last 10 -15 seconds during touch down.[ **backblast from the exhaust gases ]
“We leave you much that is undone. “There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those that can remove one of truth’s protective layers." Neil Armstrong
WATCH THE VIDEO of the Moon Transit from the Deep Space Climate Observitory Satalite. It shows about 9 hours of Earth rotation. Notice how the clouds don't move. They don't get bigger or smaller. Normal clouds generally move Eastward FASTER than the rotation of the Earth. These clouds instead stick solidly in place and NOT MOVE AL ALL.
Sam in Bithlo I can already tell your life isn’t what you wanted it to be huh? Hating others for they’re opinion is disgusting and you should be ashamed.
8 years from putting a man in orbit to putting two men on the moon and back ... with no losses ...the way technology moves so fast is incredible ...or maybe not
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo all the excuses everyone can come up with ...but half a century later and no moon landing....im no newton or hawking but them numbers dont add up
@@stevenmartin6473 that’s due to a multitude of reasons, including public interest and budget. After the moon landing NASA fell from 4% of the federal budget to less than 1%
I swear ppl fall for anything how is a flag moving when there is no wind or air in space 😂how did Neil walk on the moon when the print on the moon didn’t match the bottom of his space boots
Scahoni Scientific illiteracy is about 70 percent in American. Few people are smart enough to piece together the simple clues that show. Yes, we landed on the Moon.
Hello Deer Freends! Camersa work with a roll of film in thems. Koachrime or Ektachgromus or FeejiFilms or Kodax x-rayez filesm. its not topo sekretcs!!!
@@rajashahja8975 Hi Raja, "live video from a film camera". Do you know what a film camera is? Do you know how a film camera works in simple terms? Do you know what medium a film camera utilises? Do you know that they had video TV cameras in 1969? Can't you tell the difference between film footage and video footage that was taken on the moon?
Accepted Scientific Research for the last 100 years 1. Form a scientific hypothesis. (Ask why and how something happens.) 2. Check available literature. Read related articles in textbooks, scientific journals, etc. 3. If no suitable answer is found, set up an experiment to test your hypothesis. 4. Repeat your experiment a couple of times. If your experiment disproved your hypothesis, discard your hypothesis, and go back to step 1. 5. Interpret and publish the results. Research to a conspiracy theorist (including Flat Earth believers and Moon hoax theorists)
1. Form a hypothesis 2. Check UA-cam videos. 3. Do a Google search, accepting only results from the Flat Earth Society, Bart Sibrel, or other known conspiracy theory channels/groups. 4. Publish your results on UA-cam comments and related Facebook threads. All while hoping the criminal cartel in the Illuminati, freemasons, etc that you believe to be NASA cartel doesn't censor your online posts and comments.. 5. When all available evidence contradicts your hypothesis, throw away the evidence. Remember it's all tainted by the government.
@@DeputyNordburg Ever heard of a satellite? That’s how we found out, which you yourself could’ve found out if you had done basic research before spewing an objectively false conspiracy.
Well explain this, if we had the technology then, then why haven’t we gone back at all? And why are we still trying to improve our space technology when it’s 100x better than it was in the sixties? I don’t know the name of the guy, but one of the top scientists at NASA was at a press conference and said “Hopefully we will get to the moon one day” and you could see his face right after full of regret as the press completely blew up with questions. Explain that.....
Area 51, they have let everyone think 'aliens' on purpose. Years ago I saw an arial pic completey overlaid onto the first moon landing. Hands down it matched up and that is where they filmed. I live right next to Area 51 and for over 20 years have known and still know people who work there. Not saying that we have not landed on the moon, but the first landing was a hoax to make the USA appear like the super power.
That's funny except Kubrick wasn't a perfectionist. If he was why did A Clockwork Orange only take him a year to make? Look up the most imperfect masterpiece, he was crunched for time and honestly A Clockwork Orange is a B-Movie. No matter how much I love it or how iconic it is, it's Kubricks worst film besides Eyes Wide Shut.
You must be a dumb to say the second part, the Russian invented satellite, space.tation, spaceship. The Russian did went to space the first. Gagarin is the first man went to the space.
Only a few dozen engineers and directors needed to be in on the Apollo 11 space race deception to pull it off. Everyone else had no idea. It could be done.
So you are saying that everyone else was just designing, building and testing all the parts for a spacecraft that would be able to go to the moon and then some higher ups just threw them away and faked it? Sounds fishy to me, mate
@@vyralator2638 >Australian You people are the biggest gov-cucks on the planet. Terrified of authority, willing to leap through multiple hoops to justify some fallacy you think is the truth, I would never put my faith in an Australian to tell me how the world works.
Moon is 384,400 kms away from earth, our spaceshuttle can travel maximum 600kms, space station is nearly 250-400kms. These fools think man travelled 750,000kms in moon space missions? Without considering huge oxygen and fuel tanks and landing on earth with a space shuttle? Blind believers of science
Halfwit, look up rebreathing systems vs scuba systems, then look up how much more oxygen you can store if it's a liquid. Finally, realize that with no atmosphere to slow them down, they could coast most of the way to and from the moon.
purpose of the space shuttle - transport astronauts in and out of orbit, and the ISS. purpose of a long range rocket - to get stuff farther out into space they didn't land on the moon in a space shuttle for god's sake. it didn't even exist in 1969. by the way a nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile's normal route is over 1000 kilometers above the earth's atmosphere. *1000 kilometers*
“The Real-Time Computer Complex (RTCC) was an IBM computing and data processing system at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston. It collected, processed and sent to Mission Control the information needed to direct every phase of an Apollo/Saturn mission. It computed what the space vehicle was doing and compared that with what it should be doing. RTCC worked in real-time -- so fast, there was virtually no time between receiving and solving a computing problem. IBM 7094-11 computers were used in the RTCC during NASA's Gemini program and on the first three Apollo/Saturn missions. Later, IBM System/360 Model 75J mainframes, plus peripheral storage and processing equipment, were employed. Two computers were used during a mission: one was primary; the other operated identically but as standby.”
Hi Cedric, no computers in when apollo 11 landed on the moon. I worked at Elliot Automation when apollo landed, we certainly had computers. The 905 computers used integrated circuits, they had gone beyond transistor, diode, resistor technology. You have no idea what the computers were like in 1969 do you, you didn't work in the industry at that time, did you?? Well I did as did many thousands at Elliot Computers. Look up the Elliott 905 computers o 1969. here's a link to this computer!!! I was a field service engineer on this computer all those years ago. Yes TTL integrated circuits were the processor driving force!! Where do you live Cedric, I'd love to have a face to face chat on this aspect of the British 905 18 bit digital computer of 1969.
"One finds it impossible to believe a moon lading over 50 years ago when there were no computers and no Wi-Fi." There were computers and NASA used them. And wireless technology was invented in the 1890s. It's called "radio."
Look at the photo of the astronaut at 1.47. The background shows a terrain with shadows, indicating the light source ( the sun supposedly ?), to the right on the picture and behind him. His shadow, and any others should be in front of him, and to the left. Now look at the reflection in his visor. It shows another astronaut together with expected shadow. But around him is a brighter patch of light, as though it's a lamp and not the sun, I've never yet seen the sun light up a small area, leaving the rest in shadow like my security lights do.
Also there's a little white object on the floor (visible on the left-hand side in visor) it's shadow points wrong direction....most likely from another source of light so if they didn't bring any lamps with them to light up the show on the Moon, definitely had couple in a studio
LMFAO! If all this was achieved in era of 60s and 70s, then by now there should have been frequent tours to the moon. But in today's world of Advanced Science and Tech there has not been a single person sent to the moon. 🤐
its funny she says 400,00 employees kept a secret. so therefore it must be the truth cause not one person came forward to tell the moon landing is a hoax. just ask neil armstrong . oh i forgot he ran away from a reporter who offered him 1,000 to swear on bible that he went to the moon . he literally ran away like 100 yard dash
@@josephzahn6182 An idiot tried to force a confession from elderly Neil and Buzz on seperate occasions , by thrusting a bible at them to swear on that they had been to the moon . Neil did not run , he was standing and talking to someone when he was abruptly interrupted and told to confess - he rightly refused to ignore the accuser and walked away . Buzz however was entering a building when approached , same thing , was being told to confess in an aggressive manner by Bart Sebrel , who was holding a bible . Buzz refused to comply to that idiots requests , was man handled and defended himself with a right hook to Sebrels jaw . Sebrel took Buzz to court , the judge threw out the case saying Sebrel deserved the hit . He later apologised for his action . Buzz Aldrin is a devout Catholic and prayed for all mankind as he conducted a mini service inside the LM during his moon stay . Those great men certainly walked on the moon and don't deserve constant accusations by the ill informed . So did 10 others from 1969 to 1972 . Apollo's 8,9,10 did not land as they were test flights for future landings , Apollo 13 had a serious malfunction and needed to return to Earth without landing on the luna surface . The technology ( some 6000 inventions ) used to achieve those moon missions was cutting edge and super expensive at the time. It was a massive undertaking by many hundreds of contactors and hundreds of thousands of people across the United States that enabled those missions to go ahead. Hundreds of kg of moon rocks were collected by the astronauts , those rocks are kept in a secure vault in Houston and are used for scientific research around the world . Apollo took place in an era of huge technical advancement through the 1960's - the supersonic airliner Concord was being developed then , satellites were advancing tele- communcations . And computers were shrinking in size due to the invention of the micro chip ( by NASA ) . By the 1960's the world had developed nuclear weapons capable of destroying civilization - it was a real possibility that the USA and USSR would launch strikes on each other over the Cuba Missile Crisis . Much of the technology we have at our disposal these days evolved from tech of the 1960's - it had to start from somewhere . The Apollo missions pushed the boundaries of understanding on aerospace tech . It was risky and complex and very real .
@@bizzjoe Nixon making a call to the moon from the White House was a first and could only be achieved because the technology was available in the 60's to do it .
I wonder why didn’t they try to take just one picture of the night sky throughout their journey, wouldn’t that be a good chance to get the clearest picture of stars and galaxies
WATCH THE VIDEO of the Moon Transit from the Deep Space Climate Observitory Satalite. It shows about 9 hours of Earth rotation. Notice how the clouds don't move. They don't get bigger or smaller. Normal clouds generally move Eastward FASTER than the rotation of the Earth. These clouds instead stick solidly in place and NOT MOVE AL ALL.
The fact that you think those shitty cameras are better than any telescope at taking pictures of the stars just because they’re taking pictures from the moon and that makes them closer to the stars is the most laughable thing I’ve ever heard anyone try to use as a “fact“ to debunk the moon landing
This was childish, I miss those days when you could watch adults have a decent conversation regarding the pros and cons of this topic. When serious issues with the official narrative were examined in detail...thx you tube for your anti 1st amendment stance and communist china like sensorship.
EXPOSED is what you report. All you exposed was a list of some of the conspiracy theories. We have those already. I hope you, as an investigative reporter, did not get paid for this garbage. You’ve added nothing of value to the issue. So, thanks for nothing!
They couldn’t invent a camera that can capture the stars (because at that time technology was not that much developed ) but invented the computer coded vehicle (which could work like today’s AI based technology) really 😂?
@@mpniko It's not an excuse, it's the fact of the matter: The cameras they had were modified to make it easy for the astronauts to take pictures _of the moon._ And as they were bathed in direct unfiltered sunlight, they were configured to take pictures under those conditions. And stars are not exposed at those settings.
@@Tim22222 Why no stars in the photos from Walmart Parking lots!!! Man has never been to Walmart! Also, they took photos of the stars with a telescope on Apollo 16. Maybe watch a video or read up on these things.
14 Australians, eh? Or just Una Ronald? Who had to "stay up late" to see the Apollo 11 EVA even though the EVA happened at 10:30 a.m. in her Australian time zone. I'm not even getting into the C rock though, but that claim is equally as dumb.
agnesbutterbun LOL Are you still in 4th grade? Does anybody actually go to school anymore.? Come on, you mean to tell me you can't find any evidence 27 men visited the Moon.? What do Moon hoax believers do for a living.? You can't be a librarian, they have books in a library.Time to go back to school.
Doofus go watch 2001 again and then tell us all how good he was a faking anything. There are dozens of mistakes that any school kid can spot . Obvious shit like the phase of the moon changing from scene to scene while they are flying past. He didn't even try to simulate the 1/6th gravity and it is completely obvious during all the moon scenes.
Duh! Not only was it faked, the evidence they found about alien life was also covered up during the faked landing. While they faked the landing they also found non human tracks on the moon surface as well as captured three alien space ships watching them! Our government is so corrupt!
The reflection appears to be showing a trailer in the background which could have been put in the desert to use as a makeup trailer for the characters in the video shown.🤷🏻♂️
I've seen this thing about the lighting before and yes, there would be reflection from the Moon surface, but in that photo what makes you think the sun is up to the right anyway? Looking a the shadows around the LM window top right the sun could well be upper left.
Which one? There were hundreds. You mean the official post mission press conference? You only find it 'weird' because online conspiracy theory has told you what to think. You obviously haven't watched the entire footage from start to finish, rather appropriated excerpts from junk conspiracy videos and supposed documentaries that have omitted them laughing and joking. Having undertaken a rigorous and exhausting programme of training consisting of six day weeks for six months, the mental and physical demands and intensity of the eight day mission, immediate quarantine for three weeks directly before - not to mention the prospect of an exhaustive and exhausting programme of P/R press conferences during a gruelling world tour consisting of 29 cities in 24 countries in 38 days...you really expect them to be bouncing off the walls with enthusiasm? Neil Armstrong in particular was a particularly introverted, private, shy and modest individual. A demonstrably brave test pilot and astronaut, but the thought of being paraded around the world must have filled him with utter dread. However,, characters such as Pete Conrad, Al Shepard, Charlie Duke, Eugene Cernan and Ron Evans all had far more ebullient personalities. Perhaps you should also watch the post mission press conferences for Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and even the aborted Apollo 13 landing that your conspiracy theory never mentions? Whilst at it, find footage and images of them beaming after recovery in the Mobile Quarantine Trailer or on the deck of the USS Hornet Frankly if that's all it takes to convince you, it's hardly surprising that people of your ilk are the target market for these conmen and frauds that perpetrate crap online conspiracy theory.
The firs press conference was still in spacesuits and held on the aircraft carrier that fished them out of the drink. If you haven't seen it, you are fooling yourself.
@SeaFoxx Exactly, the anomalies are how scientists, engineers, nerds, etc know NASA landed on the Moon. 100 percent of all conspiracy theorists are science illiterate, hence why they have a strong belief in pseudoscience, half-truths, and out-of-context quotes. The only way NASA could have faked the lunar surface EVA's is with a gravitational field generator that's capable of warping / bending localized spacetime inside a custom-built vacuum sound stage. Since that technology is at least a few hundred years away if, at all possible, we can prove beyond a doubt,12 men walked on the Moon.
Maybe Kubrick deliberately left clues in the footage? The LM docking footage is completely wrong. The moon shakes as the film moves, while the LM movement stays perfectly smooth, which would indicate that the camera was shaking. But the LM movement stays perfectly smooth. Ergo, the LM had to be joined physically to the CM all the time during the filming of the docking for it to not vibrate at all. Also, when you focus on something near the background is normally well in focus also. In the docking footage the LM is in perfect focus, but the moon is 'foggy'. The moon has no atmosphere so why isn't it perfectly in focus?
@@WAsmellycat this was a joke haha I’m a huge Kubrick fan. This was a COMPLIMENT, even if it was a joke one. I hope you take blood pressure medicine, getting angry over a comment on UA-cam isn’t healthy 😂
"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is, we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it is a painful process to build it back again." 😂👍
if the landing was real, why is nasa and other agencies still struggling to take people to space, if they could sucessfully send a manned vehicle to moon 40 years back, i really doubt it. We dont have that technology even now after 40 years. SPACEX and blue origin have failed miserably. If it was true space travel wouldnt have been a big deal now.
Keeping 400,000 people quiet? Ever hear of compartmentalizing? It's not like the guy who made the door latch needed to know what was going. The fact you didn't even think of something as simple as this should make you question all of your thinking.
@ Johnnysinsidethematrix. compartmentalizing? Maybe if you were building an interior door latch at a shop with 27 employees. Not a latch for a spacecraft, aircraft, racecar, passenger vehicle . .😉38,000 at NASA and another 375,000 employed by 20,000 subcontracting aerospace, industrial firms, universities, etc My uncle worked for Grumman Aerospace in Bethpage, NY They designed, engineered, and manufactured the Apollo LEM He sat around for 13 years getting paid to work on a circus prop. LOL, Where do you work.? Does your company pay you a salary for incomplete work? The B -2 bomber cost a billion per plane. They're fake, no one knew they weren't supposed to fly. Wake up.
@@Godscountry2732 D-Day was kept secret until the last moment, although ultimately it involved hundreds of thousands. You think the privates knew when they were going to disembark? They didn't. High grade weapons are also built like this, with only a few at the top gettimg the whole picture. Sorry to tell you but your uncle was fooled with the rest of america. Gus Grissom and Thomas Baron also knew this. You proved nothing, congratulations. You actually believe that 50 years ago, man went to the moon and back 6 times in a span of less than 3 years, twice a year? All during Tricky Dicks administration.That 12 men walked on the moon, and that they took three cars and played golf? That they spoke to the president directly, and emitted live television from the moon with 60s technology? A distance 1000 times greater than any astronaut has gone since. That they lost the telemetry data and that they recorded over original Apollo tapes as if it was a rerun of the Cosby Show? ...And no one has done it since. Not the russians, not Musk, not China, not Gates... No one. Not even once. I have a rocketship to sell you.
@@johnnyreality The beauty of science is that it stands up to skepticism. Arguing" about whether we went to the Moon is like arguing about " Is the earth a flat disk on a turtle's back?. You have to actually prove these crazy conspiracy claims and that has never happened. It would be like you claiming the 842 lbs /382 kgs of lunar rock and soil aren't from the Moon or they were collected by thousands of robotic missions. Without scientific proof, what do you have.?Nothing, just an opinion. Opinions don't solve problems or answer questions. You have to actually prove these crazy conspiracy claims and that has never happened. It all comes down to trust. Should we ask to the lunar geologist who's spent his life studying lunar geology or some guy on the internet who says trees grow on the Moon and space is fake.? I'm going with the lunar geologists. How about you.?
@@Godscountry2732 you don't know me or my credentials. Where are those rocks? Have you seen them? How do you know where they came from? Would those be like the fossilised wood the Apollo 11 astronauts gave to the dutch prime minister, passing it as lunar rocks? Did you know SS officer and father of the Apollo program Wernher von Braun actually went to Antarctica in 1966-67 together with other NASA management members to search for meteorites? You can't say this is like the flat earth theory which could be disproved with a weather balloon and a gopro. The ludicrous apollo claims are much harder to prove/disprove as no telescope has the capacity to see any of the hardware supposedly left on the moon. Not even Hubble can do that. Do yourself a favor and go watch the interview of the Apollo 11 astronauts when they returned to earth. Seriously, do it, then read the comment section. If you don't, I'll know you're brainwashed and that I can't help you. Sometimes patriotism is blinding, specially if your uncle was a part of it. Whatever happened to the 500 page Baron report? You answered nothing (they lost the telemetry data of the biggest engineering feat of all mankind? Really?) and proved nothing so I am not sure what science you're talking about. Speaking of brainwashing, SS officer Wernher von Braun's friend, Adolf Hitler, wrote in Mein Kampf: "All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true within itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."
some things are top secret like the atomic bomb development, the D day landings. The apollo missions were no way secret, the mission was told to the world by JFK. Most of the work was not secret, the inertial navigation system was I believe was top secret though.
No one ever questions the landscape in these pictures. Rocks lying on the surface like in the moon shots can only happen in an atmosphere. There is no way these rocks can get on top of the dust without leaving a crater or rolling trail!
@@theonewiththeeyeoftruth884 no he actually has a valid point even if the way he's trying to describe it is a little scratchy... I know what he's talking about... Those moon rocks they supposedly found and brought back, were different colored than the surface and it had life in the rock... The rock was from earth fam.
@@theonewiththeeyeoftruth884 Your still in the Public zone... It's kinda like a park, it's a public place it's common.. I'm more like in a concert, that you most likely have to pay money for the tickets... There were no rocks they brought back that had a different color and life because the rock wasn't from the moon... That's all I was saying... Believe it or not there is credible scrutiny of the Moon landing out there... There is also credible facts that we did go to the edge of space. If your not sure what that is, it still in our atmosphere right before you exit, then into the Van Allen radiation belts with dangerous amounts of radiation for anything physical or biological... Those are FACTS
@@YizzyBeBuzy-COPRODO You concert is the _cult_ where no one knew what was actually in the Kool-Aid. I've seen _all_ the "scrutiny" of the Moon LandingS (landingS, you probably didn't know there were more than one). None of it holds up. They brought back rocks from the Moon. Geologists world-wide have confirmed this. Nothing challenges it. There is no edge of space. It goes on indefinitely. Edge of space still in our atmosphere? What is that? Flat earth and the firmament? Totally ridiculous.
"You know when youre on earth and take a picture at night and cant see the stars? Its the same on the moon because of exposure". Now Im not an astrophysicist, but ive heard of an atmosphere before. So they went to the moon and took no pictures of the trillions of stars surrounding them? But people constantly post food pics of cheerios, makes sense.
So, you've heard of an atmosphere? Really? What does an atmosphere have to do with light exposure in photography? What does astrophysics have to do with photographic exposure? Why would they waste time and resources taking pictures of the stars while on the moon?
Getbuckets.Close but no cigar.....Space is a vacuum, hence it's black during the daytime sun. Earth has an atmosphere, hence the blue sky during the daytime. On the lunar surface, it was daytime, the sun was shining. A lunar day lasts around 28 earth days. Seeing and photographing stars in the daytime sun is pretty difficult. They did photograph stars using a telescope and special optics,etc as well as on the far side [lunar orbit ]out of the sun's glare. But despite what some scientists claimed, almost all of the 12 Apollo astronauts stated they saw no stars in the daytime sun. Had they tried to expose a large bright star, the image would have been washed out. overexposed.
@@BigRalphSmithright, because after spending what would equate to billions by today's money, they don't want to spend a few hundred bucks and a few minutes taking pictures of stars, yet they are playing golf on the moon. Makes perfect sense.
You had me all the way up till the engineered flag to move in space and the explanation for it, that is like so farfetched to me and way too convinient.
The flag flapping was made to create a sense of pride for America and if the flag was not like that it would probably feel less amazing that America succeeded on their journey to the moon
I can picture a stiff flag that stand out and away from the pole, but without ambient motion. but that flag had ambient motion, and no one was touching it, and no wind of course. So... magnets?
if the landing was real, why is nasa and other agencies still struggling to take people to space, if they could sucessfully send a manned vehicle to moon 40 years back, i really doubt it. We dont have that technology even now after 40 years. SPACEX and blue origin have failed miserably. If it was true space travel wouldnt have been a big deal now. my question why were these 2 stooges chosen to be a part of this drama. With the technology they had back in 60's and with the the technology we have now in 2022, I dont believe even 1 % of this story, just a big lie.
Absolutely - so long as they are legitimate ones. The problem with conspiracy theorists and the dumb believers in their nonsense is that they aren't remotely interested in the answers.
Even with all the technologies we have today, no one can get to the moon, mankind has only made it to 200 miles above earth orbit. Moon is 238,900 miles away. !
That is right reflection. The technical team at NVIDIA, which provides GPU devices that enable high-speed computer calculations for Google Earth and other applications, recreated images of the moon landing on a computer in order to improve visual expression technology. Using their GPU equipment and VXGI (Voxel Global Illumination) technology, which expresses light as images, they succeeded in creating detailed computer modeling of how sunlight hits the lunar surface. It was announced that the light shadows in the reproduced lunar landing footage matched the lighting conditions in photographs taken during the Apollo program.
according to 2:13 the astronaut suit is reflecting indicating the sun's direction. How then are the rock shadows indicating the sun in the opposite direction ?
NASA : yeah so we can’t go to the moon today cuz of van allen radiation belts, somehow we went in 1969 but we lost that technology and lost all the video footage. Oopsie!
The problem is if they're explaining, them I'm doubting. If it really happened, they wouldn't waste their time. Or they'd be busy going back and forth moonwise.
the wired thing is UA-cam removed all the real concpiracy videos...now that is suspicious
Shanto Lion No they haven’t
@@m22gang65 yes they did but not all of them
Amen
It's the age of censorship.
Shameful.
@@snatchhog Why censor it if it's nonsense?
“They engineered a flag to wave in zero atmosphere” is the most stupidest thing i’ve ever heard.
I could not agree more. I had never heard that ridiculous argument before. NASA is now claiming their engineers created a battery powered waving mechanism for the flag, and never told anybody about it. How far will they go to fool people?
The flag was an upside down L you twats lmao look at the very last clip of the video when its shaking, you can clearly see theres a support beam extruding 90 degrees from the top of the centre post lol. & also if you listened carefully you would have actually heard her say “They engineered a flag to LOOK like it was moving in a breeze” Lol back to school little boi
the flag metal is an upside down L
Why is that stupid.? The flagpole is an inverted L . There's still gravity on the moon and no wind to make the flag wave. So it'll just hang down if there's no support on the upper side. Don't you want the flag to be identified as the american flag in the pictures.? Why is that stupid.? Otherwise it'll just be seen as a cloth hanging down from a pole in the pictures.
@@operatora588 THE MOON LANDING WAS NOT FAKE IT IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY, HERE IS PROOF:
ua-cam.com/video/dWBYAxhH3u4/v-deo.html
So. They made up a lie and now exposed themselves further
Do you mean the conspiracy theorists? Because yes, that is what they do.
@@DeputyNordburg stop sucks shameless moon lander
@@mevineven869 Bad English is part of the stereotype. So is Ad Hom.
She sounds like The Vintage Space Amy Shirateitel girl.
@@DeputyNordburg i know for a fact the moon landing was fake. Ive seen ufos before and they've been around since 1930. Going to the moon would've been of no issue and they wouldn't have used a rocket or anything like that. Its all a hoax
50 years back the moon landers were landing with couple of humans in it so smoothly n successfully each time, but 50 years after that when technologies have way advanced than that time, the world is struggling to land moon landers.
Isn't this quite unbelievable by itself!!!
Becoz... 1969 landing is fake....
Yes that want i think 😂, but some blind follow idiots still believes that nasa moon landing is real😂, my question is that without launchpad how they lift up from the moon surface even in modern time they don't know how to do that and the another question is that how they docked the lunar module to command module without the proper technologies 😂, it's a ridiculous 😂
Because space is hard, it's not that easy. Even after doing all calculations and simulations, things could still go wrong. And also not all space agencies of countries have enough resources compared to NASA. One big reason why NASA hasn't sent humans back to the moon for so many years is becoz of budget. In the 1960s , the USA and Soviet Union were basically doing a race to reach the moon first. And also there was a lot public interest. Due to that the government had given huge budget to NASA. It was like as if the government was giving NASA a infinite stream of money. Therefore huge progress was made in very little time and we managed to land on the moon. Several Apollo missions were conducted. But after a while public interest went down, and America had other problems to deal with, so NASA's budget was reduced. It was getting very expensive to send missions to moon and the science u got back was very little. Instead u could send rovers and landers on moon which will be much more cheap, require a smaller rocket, and will be much productive than sending humans. Also modifying a Saturn V with modern equipment is not that easy, to change one thing they will need to change another and so on. Also there was no point doing the same exact mission which we already have achieved. We needed much more efficiency
Also some like to say why didn't they have many failures and how come all missions were so successful. Yes they had many failures before, there was one where 3 astronauts died alive during a fire, and it was only after several missions, it was Apollo *11* which finally got humans to the moon. Also the Apollo 13 was nearly a disaster but they managed to bring them back home safely. I don't want to waste much time so here's a analogy
This u can compare to Airplane and car accidents. According to statistics there are more car accidents every year than plane accidents, plane crashes are extremely rare. From watching all those plane crash investigation videos it might seem there are a lot of plane crashes when actually it's not true. Planes are actually the safest mode of transport.
Moon landing was definitely a Hoax which many people believed to be true just because NASA told them and also because of those famous videos of flag hoisting on Moon and astronauts walking and jumping on Moon!
Note the dates of those 6 Moon landings:-
1st Crewed Moon landing - 20 July 1969
2nd Crewed Moon landing - 14 Nov 1969
3rd Crewed Moon landing - 31 Jan 1971
4th Crewed Moon landing - 26 July 1971
5th Crewed Moon landing - 16 Apr 1972
6th Crewed Moon landing - 07 Dec 1972
So, NASA sent successfully 6 Crewed Moon mission within 3.5 years !!! But it didn't try to send another in last 50 years! Now someone will say these missions are costly so they didn't do it again. Oh come on! They had money to do 6 missions within 3.5 years but not enough money for one more mission even in 50 years! This shows that NASA is hiding something. They created fake Moon landing pictures with help of filmmaker Stanley Kubrick. Stanley himself confessed his involvement in fake Moon landing.
NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. 200,000 magnetic tapes recording were destroyed. How this happened? Were NASA scientists not smart enough to save those tapes and real videos from getting damaged? They intentionally destroyed everything because there was no original Moon landing video in those cassettes !
If Moon landing was so easy in 1969-72 then many other countries like Russia, Japan, India should have been able to launch atleast one successful Crewed Moon mission! But no country has done it yet despite so much advancement in science and technology! Just compare the technology of 1969 (when there was no mobile, no laptops, no internet, no 4G, 5G) with today's advance technology. US could do 6 successful Moon landing within 3.5 years with that old technology but the world can't do even 1 successful Moon landing with modern technology. The knowledge of today's scientists about space, universe, rocket science is definitely more than those scientists of 1969 but still today's scientists can't make 1 successful Crewed Moon landing! This creates serious doubts in mind about NASA moon landings!
Russia, Japan, Israel, Europe, India find it difficult to land a satellite safely on Moon even in today's time. India successfully landed its "Chandrayan 3" lunar craft on 23rd August 2023 on South pole of Moon and it was considered a big achievement by whole world. India failed in 2019 and Russia's Luna 25 also failed in 21 August 2023! Just landing of a satellite on Moon is so difficult even in 2023 with so much advancement in science and technology, how can NASA sent 6 successful Crewed Moon landing mission within 3.5 years !!!! This is highly doubtful.
Going to Moon can be very challenging and returning to Earth safely can be even more challenging!
In my opinion Moon landing was a HOAX !!
Started video and paused it to read the comments, way more interesting
Didn't even watch it - but the comments are great. Of course there's no moon - it's someone up there with a torch just being a bloody nuisance while we're trying to sleep. Probably one of those UFO guys.
@@alanhayward8237 yeah. Typical conservatives. Thinking anything is fake.
@@gdskulll4875 I'm sure your account is fake
@@chadwilcox1077 Uh, your account is fake. You have no pfp, no videos, and it is pretty obvious you are just a Russian bot.
@@gdskulll4875 yeah because bots just make up stupid scream names, I'm gonna make a bot screen name GDSkulll2 and proclaim everyone else is fake
The best movie ever made by US, as well as the actors
If it was fake america would have been exposed by the ussr
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@PobitroMonFlag kese le rha tha or log usko bi justify kr rh he 😂 sb dikhta he log pagal ni jo smje ni.
Fake Moon Landing
True
True
Fake as hell
I just ask a few things, if the man reached the moon in 1969; Why haven't other countries reached the moon so far, whereas today's mobile technology is ten times that time, and after that, why didn't NASA send another human to the moon.
The two areas of technology are unrelated in any way.
Your comment is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read, at no point in your rambling incoherent response were you close to anything resembling a rational thought the internet is now dumber for having it I award you no points.
look you just give me the one answer that till now why other countries astronaut did not reach or send to the moon. and please don't tell me that it's too expensive.
@@robinmishr First question answered: Other countries have no reason to go to the moon after the space race
Second question answered: America has no reason to go to the moon after the space race
@@huntersiagames6028get with the program. They're already talking about mining. Moon resources.
With the technology of the 60's I have a hard time believing they landed on the moon and came back. If it was so successful getting there today wouldn't be such an issue
Nilesh Kumar Routray only time humans have did something & never did it again is when they failed.... money has nothing to do with going back if they really went but you won’t understand that point of view just the view you were forced to believe
@ nasa has said as soon as they find a way to get past the van hellen belt we will go back,NOT. use logic if there is a van hellen belt now there was one in 1969!!!!
@@josephzahn6182 you do realize we can just go around the Van Allan belts?
@@williamhutton1752 um william do u realize its NASa thats has stated as soon as we figure how to get past those belts we will go back to the moon . lol obviously you have stock in NASA. hope you lost a lot in game stock :)
Its not hard going back...its expensive and innificient and doesnt serve nuch monetary gain
The technology needed to fake it at the time would have been EVEN MORE advanced because the parralele shadows cant be replicated using stage lighting
We don't expect the mainstream media to give us the facts do we
Who is we?
@@DeputyNordburg the mass..
@@jalenross2114 I love Massachusetts, but really only in summer.
Yeah but nasa and other research suggest that the moon landing was real. Sorry
@@DeputyNordburg I have the feeling the quietly went "i said too much"
I have a couple technical questions. According to NASA the surface of the moon where the Apollo missions landed was approx. 250 degrees F. Since the landers were made of aluminum which like all metals conducts heat how did they keep the LEM cool? How did they keep it from expanding, warping, popping seams welds and joints? How did they keep the interior cool, the electronics from frying and the crew from cooking? Same story for the cameras. They weren't specially insulated from what I can tell and they were also made of mostly heat conducting metal. And what about the film? What kept it from melting or at least being badly damaged? Did NASA develop some special super duper ultra high temp film?
Good luck with that, like the knowledgeable IQ man above it is moslty sentiment. The ploy is being 'Morning' the surface was not heated up yet. Used a lot of tinfoil technology. Unlike the Command Module that rotated it had to have airconditioning.
Cameras litely modified; no fluids and reflective paint... have faith my man.
Edit note:
For the very knowledgeable (anal) Seers >> It’s *aluminum* foil.
(well not really really >> mylar foil!)😜
@@narajuna Since the LEM was on the surface for over 24 hrs. the "morning" ploy goes away. I've also been told 250degrees F. in space isn't the same as on earth, micrometeroite shielding protected them (couldn't even find that anywhere). The miracle reflective foil which only covered the engine compartment not the crew comp. They try. Oh how they try.
@@cromlaughsatyourfourwinds8333 Now you are being unknowledgeable; nasa science says a daytime last over 700 hrs.
Heat is worst thou, no gasses to dispate heat like here. It is freezing in the shadows, perhaps an open window?
@@narajuna You had me laughing on that one! Good one!
@@cromlaughsatyourfourwinds8333 _"Since the LEM was on the surface for over 24 hrs. the "morning" ploy goes away."_
Why? A day on the Moon is 392 hours. A sidereal day is 700 hours (28 days). So it's a fact that the lunar surface didn't heat to max temperature.
The thermal conductivity of lunar regolith is quite low. Also, the landings legs were insulated. NASA has a full on report on the thermal effects on the landing legs (from surface and exhaust), and in fact, that was the first thing Buzz Aldrin commented on.
Mylar and Kapton reflects a lot of IR radiation away, and retains a lot of heat. This prevents the LM from overheating. MLI is used on the ISS, and many other satellites. The spacecraft is kept cool by radiators and sublimators. The Kapton covered the crew compartment too. It's just hidden by the Micrometeoroid shields (whipple shields).
A lot of engineering went into the design of the Apollo TV camera. The film didn't melt because it was insulated by a vacuum. Apollo is not the only time film cameras were used in space. High Altitude Reconnaissance aircraft, and Reconnaissance satellites use it too.
The Americans were losing badly in Vietnam, plus other problems. Could the moon landings have been a diversion and did we really have the necessary technology in 1969 ???
Yes* and yes. The primary reasons for the moon landings was to develop ballistic weapons technology, and explore the moon for military applications. But the goodwill and diversion from the Vietnam war were certainly secondary reasons to do it.
we had a lot in 1969. that was the era of modernization of militaries, ballistic missiles, improvements of computers and you guessed it, rocketry. the things we have now are just more modernized versions of what we had back then. except like cellphones or stealth technology.
I place my belief in the Bible over individuals who are always untruthful. Landing on the moon is not possible. I agree with you. At that time, technology was limited and even now, no one ventures to the moon.
USA Today... Fire your UA-cam crew.
The moon landing wasn't fake, it's a conspiracy theory here is proof: ua-cam.com/video/dWBYAxhH3u4/v-deo.html
@@supermananimationsstudios8519 ofc real
The video Apollo 11 used radiated away because of the Sun. Yes, the footage of the first space mission is fake, but that doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen. I actually want to discuss this with someone, so if anyone believes that the moon landing didn’t happen, I’m happy to rationalize our thoughts.
@@8on633 the first footage was not fake either 🤦🏻♂️
derek donaldson yes it this, this is not a conspiracy, this is fact, admitted. It got destroyed.
This explanations doesn’t seem to help their case, rather casts more suspicion.
They’re better off not trying to convince us. Talk about backfire
Your inability to understand the explanation doesn't cast suspicion on them.
Who are the explanations coming from.and why? Not NASA,NASA has never addressed the hoax, except to Tweet "Yes we did " in response to an NBA star questioning Apollo program valdity.It is you alone that should know. Yes, we landed on the Moon. Science doesn't lie, people lie.
its easy to understand if you are educated but you know...
@@TheDeepState2001 You can't fix stupid. For anyone [especially Americans] to be chasing Alice after 50 years, is just ignorance on their part. Libraries are free.
@@thomaslewis7883 yh
I just spent my last weekend on Pluto
It was fun 👍
Cool
omg I'm going there next week!
@@strictly.strawb222 please share your experience too :)
Been there done that but now I forget how 🤔
😁😁😁😁
If you're one of those people that think we went to the moon then you have a rock for a brain 😆
No, merely an education beyond grammar school.
Thanks for the irony....
Well then, I guess USA Today solved the controversy. No need to examine any further, we can all move on now.
James B ...Bwahahaha!!!
You are a moron lol
HostileLemons ironic
@@oneuptoptv not really
They started off in reverse arguing that it had to happen and that Kooks saw things bla blah blah
No man has set foot on the moon. Change my mind.
I would but I just don’t feel like it
@@jake4243 nah you wouldn't. Their mind is already made up. I would however, like to know their best "proof" for their claim. I'm sure it's nothing new. It never is with these people.
They landed
Go watch the real footage therrs all evidence the flag flies cause of flag folds
I wonder why they didn't make it again. Something suspicious. If they were able to make it to the moon 50 years ago, why not again yet with the modern technology? While SpaceX is capable to work and succeed on Mars Mission, why not they do for Moon then? There is a lot of questions as such to be asked.
Neil Armstrong's name was remembered for a achivement which he never did in his life 😂.
Yea, the real hero was buzz when he punched that guy.
@@TexMex421to whom neil?
@@YtyFv-sf2xx I don't know that song, but if you hum a few bars.
There were 14 Apollo missions from 1961 to 1972.
6 missions landed on the moon.
2 other missions were to orbit around the moon and the latter to orbit around the moon and dock and undock from the lander.
So they spent 11 years faking 14 missions.
Here is how we know the US and the Soviets went to the moon.
1) The Soviets tried to steal the Apollo thunder by landing first, but their rover crashed into the moon a day before.
2) The Soviets landed multiple rovers on the moon with their Luna program. It lives on today with NASA. When the Soviet Union collapsed the Luna scientists were hired by NASA. All the rovers on Mars are the grandchildren of the Soviet Luna program. They even use the same independent 6 wheel design.
3) The most recent theory that the Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet is because of the Apollo and Luna programs. The rocks brought back and studied by scientists over the world show the moon and the Earth share the same chemical makeup. This is only possible due to collision. The latest theory is a smaller planetoid hit the Earth at a high angle. It knocked off the outer crust and made it molten. The Earth had a ring, like Saturn, until the debris reformed as the moon.
4) The European space agency, Chinese, Japanese, Russia and NASA have sent missions to map the moons surface and to identify mineral deposits. ALL of the Apollo landings show up in the pictures.
@@manueldeabreu1980 source believe me bro
It was faked. It was filmed on Mars
Damn, you’re right.
No is not, i can confirm is filmed in sun
@@adil0466 Ah yes that does make more sense :)
Actually, it was filmed in Mercury, duh 👀
Guys, It was actually filmed on all the planets... :)
R.I.P. Stanley Kubrick.
@MI6 It's not even a moon. It's a space station.
@@luchalew2884
Go watch it again they land on the moon and it is completely unconvincing in every way.
Hell he couldn't even keep the phases of the moon straight
@Din Djarin He just filmed Apollo 11 and 12.
@@Dereinzigwahrepapst No.
Big FACTS Lucha, even though NOBODY HAS DEFINITIVE PROOF, at least you got your thinking cap on... Hell they were playing the theme music from 2001: Space Odessey, on the recorded flight of NASA Odessey for the LM-7 mission... And they played the song " Age of Aquarius" , like smeared it in our face and said nannanna boo boo, stick your head in doo doo... At least your aware of the guys name
Most moon believers never heard of the guy.
Meanwhile in 2020 we can’t get to the moon. And getting to the space station is a big deal
what says we can't, and we literally just went to the ISS, it was a big deal because we haven't done it from American soil in years
Elon want to make something so lower and middle class can go to the Moon, but Neil Armstrong is fighting against him... he was in tears... starting to make people believe they never travel to the moon, and fear if we go will know the truth...
Riiiight!
You have to use some common sense.
You’re catching on. Was it a lie? I think it could be.
@@notofthisworld5267 Common sense would be that there's no reason right now to go, since there arent any big plans for the moon yet.
@ShonenAce Like through the windows of an insane asylum
No one has been to the moon
Many people have been to the moon
Smart woman
alice go back to the hood
@@mustafaamiri3277 the hood is probably 100% nicer and safer than where ur from, probably Iraq or afgan
Well not anymore
Facts about the moon surface: Temperatures that range from 140 °C (284 F) down to −171 °C (-275.8 F), an atmospheric pressure of 10−10 Pa (basically no atmosphere), and high levels of ionizing radiation from the Sun and cosmic rays (way more than the Van Allen belts). It has an atmosphere so tenuous as to be nearly vacuum. It's surface is pelted daily by extreme amounts of space debris, with no protection as the Earth's atmosphere provides. Yet, these men traveled at mach 20, in a space craft with walls in some places no thicker than aluminum foil, over a quarter of million miles through space (realize, a BB sized space rock hitting it would have been devastating) and not only land on the moon, but the suits these astronauts wore somehow protected them from the aforementioned extreme conditions. Huh yeah, ok....*smh
....research how these suits are made...they are allot more complocated then you think...
Temperatures that range from 140 °C (284 F) down to −171 °C (-275.8 F) !!!!??? 🥵🥶 Cool so like a nice pleasant 70 F is within that range. 🤩
research what the mach number means before posting such a childish comment...
The EASEP science package deployed on the surface by Apollo 11 recorded temperatures as high as 150°F (66°C) and as low as -63°F (-53°C). These temperatures were recorded via remote measurement of the nearby soil radiance.
Yup. It was so easy to do back in the late sixties. People in that era were more trusting in the news sources. They didn't question like in our era now.
Bully for the people of the modern era.
True. And we question more and more bc the stupid masses are SLOWLY learning that our government doesn’t give a shit about us.
@@ghosthunter152 Need a job.?
@@ghosthunter152 ^
They didn't question like in our era now."
Is it too much to ask they _do a good job_ questioning it??
"They engineered a flag that it look like it was moving in a breeze" LOL!!!!
They did actually, and when they were putting the flag up it broke so it moved around
I wonder how hard it is to "engineer" a flagpole to make it look like its wavering in the wind... They make things sound more complicated and technical than they really are.
@@loganeibich9600 oh dear, how they played you.
Must admit not heard that one before.
@@luisforeal8676 Exactly the flag was designed for ease of assembly while wearing a pressurized spacesuit which limited the range of motion and manual dexterity of the astronauts. Horizontal crossbars kept the flag extended as if it was caught in a breeze.[Vacuum environment ] That's it.
Oh, we can't forget the heat. The flags were carried on the outside of the Apollo Lunar Module (LM), most of them on the descent ladder inside a thermally insulated tubular case to protect them from exhaust gas temperatures calculated to reach **2,000 °F (1,090 °C) in the last 10 -15 seconds during touch down.[ **backblast from the exhaust gases ]
“We leave you much that is undone.
“There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those that can remove one of truth’s protective layers."
Neil Armstrong
WATCH THE VIDEO of the Moon Transit from the Deep Space Climate Observitory Satalite. It shows about 9 hours of Earth rotation. Notice how the clouds don't move. They don't get bigger or smaller. Normal clouds generally move Eastward FASTER than the rotation of the Earth. These clouds instead stick solidly in place and NOT MOVE AL ALL.
Beep bop bot
Believing the Truth is not a conspiracy theory
First and last time I click on a video from USA Today. At least I'm 2 minutes and 13 seconds closer to death.
Shaddap trumptrash.
@@des9544 Told ya. Shaddap trumptrash.
@@des9544 Still telling you to shaddap, too, trumptrash...l
p.s - disliking yours at the same time...lol...
Sam in Bithlo I can already tell your life isn’t what you wanted it to be huh? Hating others for they’re opinion is disgusting and you should be ashamed.
This is not news
Of course it’s news
Orange man bad
Most of what is on the "news" isn't news. Hell a lot of it is crap every one knew 50 years ago.
This is not news just propaganda! like like the Nazis always said if you say the same lie plenty of times people start to believe it
The moon landing wasn't fake, here is proof: ua-cam.com/video/dWBYAxhH3u4/v-deo.html
@@ghz24 the moon landing happened, stop crying
It would have been better if Christopher Nolan directed the landing scene. 😂
Christopher Craplan.
8 years from putting a man in orbit to putting two men on the moon and back ... with no losses ...the way technology moves so fast is incredible ...or maybe not
The guys who died... probably are not... in agreement... on the no losses...
But we have lost people trying to make it to space.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo all the excuses everyone can come up with ...but half a century later and no moon landing....im no newton or hawking but them numbers dont add up
@@stevenmartin6473 that’s due to a multitude of reasons, including public interest and budget. After the moon landing NASA fell from 4% of the federal budget to less than 1%
@@stevenmartin6473 Barely 66 unmanned missions have gone to the moon since we stopped landing on the moon. It really makes you think.
Nixon's "phone call to the moon" was hilarious .... people are so gullible.
Scahoni
Do you not understand how a phone call can be patched through a radio transmission?
I swear ppl fall for anything how is a flag moving when there is no wind or air in space 😂how did Neil walk on the moon when the print on the moon didn’t match the bottom of his space boots
Scahoni
Scientific illiteracy is about 70 percent in American. Few people are smart enough to piece together the simple clues that show. Yes, we landed on the Moon.
Moon landing is fake
@@mikhaelsundin1798
Earth: flat or round?
Exposed; as in: People with no idea how cameras work need to go find out how cameras work.
i cant tell what side this comment is on but i hope you know that it actually did happen
MI6 lmaoooo now test the shutter speed focal length & aperture then study front projection then study space oddesey then write a book about it
so they broadcasted live video from a film camera and that too from the Moon. in 1969, wow
Hello Deer Freends! Camersa work with a roll of film in thems. Koachrime or Ektachgromus or FeejiFilms or Kodax x-rayez filesm. its not topo sekretcs!!!
@@rajashahja8975 Hi Raja, "live video from a film camera". Do you know what a film camera is? Do you know how a film camera works in simple terms? Do you know what medium a film camera utilises? Do you know that they had video TV cameras in 1969? Can't you tell the difference between film footage and video footage that was taken on the moon?
Lunar buggy that fits in the glove compartment
no, it fits in one of the storage quadrants of the LM. something that's easy to research if you're not quite as incompetent and lazy as you are
@@Agarwaen wrong again shill
Yeah so thanks for proving the “conspiracy” right now give us back our billions of tax dollars.
Is this really the best content *USA TODAY* has to cover?
@Dale Gribble Shaddap pathetic trumptrash...lol...
@Dale Gribble Stop breathing through a straw...it’s effecting your cognitive abilities. 🧐🧐🧐
@Ann Ferguson, stop listening to CNN... it’s effecting your cognitive abilities. 🤨🤨🤨
@NNI7 Assuming...that’s nice. You don’t know what I listen to.🙄🙄🙄
Ann Ferguson Lmfao we both know thats what you listen to. Either that or some other liberal “news”. 😂😂😂
Made in the Hollywood basement
Says the guy living in a base.
Red Hot Chilli Peppers
The moon landing wasn't fake, here is proof: ua-cam.com/video/dWBYAxhH3u4/v-deo.html
Your mom's basement ? You're an engineer, scientist. What would you know about aerospace technology, lunar science.?Nothing.
@@thomaslewis7883 you don't have to be an engineer or scientist to know about aerospace. That's a logical fallacy called an argument of authority.
The Moon landing was staged but the actors were so dedicated to their work that they requested to film on location :)
@@galaxy5086 You: I don't judge you.
Also you: I judge you to be a fool
lol 🤣
@@galaxy5086 read your comment again but slowly...
Hahahahah
And Stanley Kubrick was directing on the moon!
Location = the studio
Always nice of the camera person to go ahead n set up perfectly for that once in a lifetime shot....
The camera was mounted at the side of the LM.
@@nickrose8733 I know lad was joking....have nice day mate be safe
bit sideways for a perfect shot.
Well I wasn’t Convinced it was Fake, Until I watched this!!! 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
@Joshua Williams
Accepted Scientific Research for the last 100 years
1. Form a scientific hypothesis. (Ask why and how something happens.)
2. Check available literature. Read related articles in textbooks, scientific journals, etc.
3. If no suitable answer is found, set up an experiment to test your hypothesis.
4. Repeat your experiment a couple of times. If your experiment disproved your hypothesis, discard your hypothesis, and go back to step 1.
5. Interpret and publish the results.
Research to a conspiracy theorist (including Flat Earth believers and Moon hoax theorists)
1. Form a hypothesis
2. Check UA-cam videos.
3. Do a Google search, accepting only results from the Flat Earth Society, Bart Sibrel, or other known conspiracy theory channels/groups.
4. Publish your results on UA-cam comments and related Facebook threads. All while hoping the criminal cartel in the Illuminati, freemasons, etc that you believe to be NASA cartel doesn't censor your online posts and comments..
5. When all available evidence contradicts your hypothesis, throw away the evidence. Remember it's all tainted by the government.
You stupid or something?
Just shows you how stupid people can be when one idiotic video can sway a gullible person
@@davidwalker5054 😂😂😂... Like This video Swayed Everyone in the 60’s 😂😂😂
So now you KNOW it is/was fake/d...
Don’t waste your 2 minutes 😀
What amazes me is how they just recently discovered water on the moon 40 years after the landing 😳
Check out abderraouf ben Halima latest video minuut 55 lol
BTW you need to have a stong mind
thats called a moon desert mirage
It's shocking that it was discovered 1000+ miles away from any landing place.
@@DeputyNordburg Ever heard of a satellite? That’s how we found out, which you yourself could’ve found out if you had done basic research before spewing an objectively false conspiracy.
The manufacturer of the camera used in the fake moon landings said Buzz aldrin was standing on the spotlight
WTF are you talking about?
This was....just awful. Truly terrible stuff. I hope you feel ashamed
Well explain this, if we had the technology then, then why haven’t we gone back at all? And why are we still trying to improve our space technology when it’s 100x better than it was in the sixties? I don’t know the name of the guy, but one of the top scientists at NASA was at a press conference and said “Hopefully we will get to the moon one day” and you could see his face right after full of regret as the press completely blew up with questions. Explain that.....
Area 51, they have let everyone think 'aliens' on purpose. Years ago I saw an arial pic completey overlaid onto the first moon landing. Hands down it matched up and that is where they filmed. I live right next to Area 51 and for over 20 years have known and still know people who work there. Not saying that we have not landed on the moon, but the first landing was a hoax to make the USA appear like the super power.
@@cheryljentz9004 to be honest I cant fly a ufo because I get car sick fast
Stanley Kubrick is so perfectionist, he actually demanded NASA to shoot the sequence on the moon.
hahaha
Good joke.
What a lad
That's funny except Kubrick wasn't a perfectionist. If he was why did A Clockwork Orange only take him a year to make? Look up the most imperfect masterpiece, he was crunched for time and honestly A Clockwork Orange is a B-Movie. No matter how much I love it or how iconic it is, it's Kubricks worst film besides Eyes Wide Shut.
His finest work was the moon landing fraud.
Oscar award should be given to Neil armstrong and yuri gagarin
and to your mother who starred in the back street porn movie where you were accidentally created...
You must be a dumb to say the second part, the Russian invented satellite, space.tation, spaceship.
The Russian did went to space the first.
Gagarin is the first man went to the space.
Only a few dozen engineers and directors needed to be in on the Apollo 11 space race deception to pull it off. Everyone else had no idea. It could be done.
So you are saying that everyone else was just designing, building and testing all the parts for a spacecraft that would be able to go to the moon and then some higher ups just threw them away and faked it? Sounds fishy to me, mate
That’s right. They have the lighting and all that in the 1960s. Absolutely
@@vyralator2638
>Australian
You people are the biggest gov-cucks on the planet. Terrified of authority, willing to leap through multiple hoops to justify some fallacy you think is the truth, I would never put my faith in an Australian to tell me how the world works.
And a big signature of undiclosure and threat to the family, eveyone shut their mouths
the glorious white race won the space race
The music in the background makes me feel like I'm in Luigi's haunted mansion.
Moon is 384,400 kms away from earth, our spaceshuttle can travel maximum 600kms, space station is nearly 250-400kms. These fools think man travelled 750,000kms in moon space missions? Without considering huge oxygen and fuel tanks and landing on earth with a space shuttle? Blind believers of science
Blind ignorant conspiracy theorists. Be sure of one think : you know very little
Halfwit, look up rebreathing systems vs scuba systems, then look up how much more oxygen you can store if it's a liquid.
Finally, realize that with no atmosphere to slow them down, they could coast most of the way to and from the moon.
purpose of the space shuttle - transport astronauts in and out of orbit, and the ISS.
purpose of a long range rocket - to get stuff farther out into space
they didn't land on the moon in a space shuttle for god's sake. it didn't even exist in 1969.
by the way a nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile's normal route is over 1000 kilometers above the earth's atmosphere. *1000 kilometers*
One finds it impossible to believe a moon lading over 50 years ago when there were no computers and no Wi-Fi. 🤔
Mission control. 100 guys sitting in front of computers... lol. Wakey wakey sleepy sheepy.
“The Real-Time Computer Complex (RTCC) was an IBM computing and data processing system at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston. It collected, processed and sent to Mission Control the information needed to direct every phase of an Apollo/Saturn mission. It computed what the space vehicle was doing and compared that with what it should be doing. RTCC worked in real-time -- so fast, there was virtually no time between receiving and solving a computing problem.
IBM 7094-11 computers were used in the RTCC during NASA's Gemini program and on the first three Apollo/Saturn missions. Later, IBM System/360 Model 75J mainframes, plus peripheral storage and processing equipment, were employed. Two computers were used during a mission: one was primary; the other operated identically but as standby.”
Hi Cedric, no computers in when apollo 11 landed on the moon. I worked at Elliot Automation when apollo landed, we certainly had computers.
The 905 computers used integrated circuits, they had gone beyond transistor, diode, resistor technology. You have no idea what the computers were like in 1969 do you, you didn't work in the industry at that time, did you?? Well I did as did many thousands at Elliot Computers. Look up the Elliott 905 computers o 1969. here's a link to this computer!!! I was a field service engineer on this computer all those years ago. Yes TTL integrated circuits were the processor driving force!!
Where do you live Cedric, I'd love to have a face to face chat on this aspect of the British 905 18 bit digital computer of 1969.
"One finds it impossible to believe a moon lading over 50 years ago when there were no computers and no Wi-Fi."
There were computers and NASA used them. And wireless technology was invented in the 1890s. It's called "radio."
This video's reason to existence is a damn conspiracy
And what's the conspiracy...just so I know it when I see it.
@@larrybrown1597 tbh I dont even remember watching this nor posting this... a conspiracy itself maybe🤔
Look at the photo of the astronaut at 1.47. The background shows a terrain with shadows, indicating the light source ( the sun supposedly ?), to the right on the picture and behind him. His shadow, and any others should be in front of him, and to the left. Now look at the reflection in his visor. It shows another astronaut together with expected shadow. But around him is a brighter patch of light, as though it's a lamp and not the sun, I've never yet seen the sun light up a small area, leaving the rest in shadow like my security lights do.
Good observation.
Also there's a little white object on the floor (visible on the left-hand side in visor) it's shadow points wrong direction....most likely from another source of light so if they didn't bring any lamps with them to light up the show on the Moon, definitely had couple in a studio
Then y US has not sent anyone else since
They sent 24 people, 12 landed on the moon.
Even lunar orbiter has shown the landing site.. and oh yeah Artemis Mission will return to Moon and you will know the truth
LMFAO! If all this was achieved in era of 60s and 70s, then by now there should have been frequent tours to the moon. But in today's world of Advanced Science and Tech there has not been a single person sent to the moon. 🤐
I can't believe anyone accepts their lies. They didn't go to the moon
its funny she says 400,00 employees kept a secret. so therefore it must be the truth cause not one person came forward to tell the moon landing is a hoax. just ask neil armstrong . oh i forgot he ran away from a reporter who offered him 1,000 to swear on bible that he went to the moon . he literally ran away like 100 yard dash
@@josephzahn6182 An idiot tried to force a confession from elderly Neil and Buzz on seperate occasions , by thrusting a bible at them to swear on that they had been to the moon . Neil did not run , he was standing and talking to someone when he was abruptly interrupted and told to confess - he rightly refused to ignore the accuser and walked away . Buzz however was entering a building when approached , same thing , was being told to confess in an aggressive manner by Bart Sebrel , who was holding a bible . Buzz refused to comply to that idiots requests , was man handled and defended himself with a right hook to Sebrels jaw . Sebrel took Buzz to court , the judge threw out the case saying Sebrel deserved the hit . He later apologised for his action . Buzz Aldrin is a devout Catholic and prayed for all mankind as he conducted a mini service inside the LM during his moon stay . Those great men certainly walked on the moon and don't deserve constant accusations by the ill informed . So did 10 others from 1969 to 1972 . Apollo's 8,9,10 did not land as they were test flights for future landings , Apollo 13 had a serious malfunction and needed to return to Earth without landing on the luna surface . The technology ( some 6000 inventions ) used to achieve those moon missions was cutting edge and super expensive at the time. It was a massive undertaking by many hundreds of contactors and hundreds of thousands of people across the United States that enabled those missions to go ahead. Hundreds of kg of moon rocks were collected by the astronauts , those rocks are kept in a secure vault in Houston and are used for scientific research around the world . Apollo took place in an era of huge technical advancement through the 1960's - the supersonic airliner Concord was being developed then , satellites were advancing tele- communcations . And computers were shrinking in size due to the invention of the micro chip ( by NASA ) . By the 1960's the world had developed nuclear weapons capable of destroying civilization - it was a real possibility that the USA and USSR would launch strikes on each other over the Cuba Missile Crisis . Much of the technology we have at our disposal these days evolved from tech of the 1960's - it had to start from somewhere . The Apollo missions pushed the boundaries of understanding on aerospace tech . It was risky and complex and very real .
@@shaneb6004 .. What about that phone call to the moon Nixon made? ..... lol
@@bizzjoe Nixon making a call to the moon from the White House was a first and could only be achieved because the technology was available in the 60's to do it .
@@josephzahn6182 Dumb, science doesn't lie, people lie.We landed on the Moon.
I wonder why didn’t they try to take just one picture of the night sky throughout their journey, wouldn’t that be a good chance to get the clearest picture of stars and galaxies
They weren't on the Moon during the lunar night.
WATCH THE VIDEO of the Moon Transit from the Deep Space Climate Observitory Satalite. It shows about 9 hours of Earth rotation. Notice how the clouds don't move. They don't get bigger or smaller. Normal clouds generally move Eastward FASTER than the rotation of the Earth. These clouds instead stick solidly in place and NOT MOVE AL ALL.
Ps u have to have a good telescope to see a galaxy
there are telescopes that do that stuff , try again
The fact that you think those shitty cameras are better than any telescope at taking pictures of the stars just because they’re taking pictures from the moon and that makes them closer to the stars is the most laughable thing I’ve ever heard anyone try to use as a “fact“ to debunk the moon landing
I’m not a conspiracy theorist but *“so they just engineered a flag to look like it was blowing in the wind”* is the lamest explanation
It's is really weird. NASA has never said they did this. Maybe USA Today is not completely accurate?
They just added a fish hook which literally moves around like its drunk whats so hard to believe
Only Americans believe they landed on the moon when in fact they landed in a studio 🤣
Smart people all around the world *_know_* they landed on the moon.
@@Tim22222 only those still living in the 60ties and a little slow in the head like you would still believe that in this day and age 😂
Studio was clearly on the moon. The best place for one.
@@DeputyNordburg yea right in their dreams
@@nelprana5861 Come on Stanley Kubrick left all the clues you need. They were on the moon!
All is fake .. made on studio
Like that saying in that movie: Astronauts on the moon .ha,ha,ha...
@Enes poturak couldnt agree with you more
when you put a horizontal stick to hold your flag up straight you know you fucked up on so many levels
One giant lie for mankind
If it was fake then Russia would have proved it already. The moon landing was real
This was childish, I miss those days when you could watch adults have a decent conversation regarding the pros and cons of this topic. When serious issues with the official narrative were examined in detail...thx you tube for your anti 1st amendment stance and communist china like sensorship.
Next up: is gravity real? Is the earth flat? Is Obama a space lizard?
Yes. No. Remains to be seen.
Yes just the facts bro
Earth is as flat as space is.
Vincent Di Nicola do we breathe oxygen and exhale 🔥???....
@@raziele92 the sun isn't real
EXPOSED is what you report. All you exposed was a list of some of the conspiracy theories.
We have those already.
I hope you, as an investigative reporter, did not get paid for this garbage. You’ve added nothing of value to the issue. So, thanks for nothing!
They couldn’t invent a camera that can capture the stars (because at that time technology was not that much developed ) but invented the computer coded vehicle (which could work like today’s AI based technology) really 😂?
Any camera can capture stars. That's not what they went to the moon for.
@@Tim22222 excuses are endless
@@mpniko It's not an excuse, it's the fact of the matter: The cameras they had were modified to make it easy for the astronauts to take pictures _of the moon._ And as they were bathed in direct unfiltered sunlight, they were configured to take pictures under those conditions. And stars are not exposed at those settings.
@@Tim22222 ahh.. typical American perspective to justify the story😌
@@Tim22222 Why no stars in the photos from Walmart Parking lots!!! Man has never been to Walmart!
Also, they took photos of the stars with a telescope on Apollo 16. Maybe watch a video or read up on these things.
Biggest lie is when they blasted off the moon no dust from the rocket
There was dust. Why are you lying?
@@Tim22222 not even enough
@@gulfy09 So you concede there was dust, then. Good!
@@Tim22222 no dust
@@gulfy09 OMG Never admit there was some dust! That's like admitting many of the astronauts had cancer from the radiation.
The 14 Australians who saw a Coca Cola bottle roll across the front of the module. The letter C on the rock in the foreground.
14 Australians, eh? Or just Una Ronald? Who had to "stay up late" to see the Apollo 11 EVA even though the EVA happened at 10:30 a.m. in her Australian time zone. I'm not even getting into the C rock though, but that claim is equally as dumb.
agnesbutterbun
LOL Are you still in 4th grade? Does anybody actually go to school anymore.? Come on, you mean to tell me you can't find any evidence 27 men visited the Moon.? What do Moon hoax believers do for a living.? You can't be a librarian, they have books in a library.Time to go back to school.
@@johnroby6524 AUSTRALIANS ARE DIC HERTZ
Moon Landing brought to you by Stanley Kubrik,,, it never happened
Doofus go watch 2001 again and then tell us all how good he was a faking anything.
There are dozens of mistakes that any school kid can spot .
Obvious shit like the phase of the moon changing from scene to scene while they are flying past.
He didn't even try to simulate the 1/6th gravity and it is completely obvious during all the moon scenes.
Duh! Not only was it faked, the evidence they found about alien life was also covered up during the faked landing. While they faked the landing they also found non human tracks on the moon surface as well as captured three alien space ships watching them! Our government is so corrupt!
The moon landing wasn't fake, it's a conspiracy theory here is proof: ua-cam.com/video/dWBYAxhH3u4/v-deo.html
The moon landing wasn't fake, it's a conspiracy theory here is proof: ua-cam.com/video/dWBYAxhH3u4/v-deo.html
@@darrelsmith1380 you know stupid people should stay quiet hopefully you learn that when you grow up
1:45 you can see the reflection of the helmet that there is no hollywood set, this is obviously just a good clickbait video
The reflection appears to be showing a trailer in the background which could have been put in the desert to use as a makeup trailer for the characters in the video shown.🤷🏻♂️
Filming at higher speeds for the slo mo effects.....
This video makes me feel like I’m going insane.
As if you aren't insane.
I've seen this thing about the lighting before and yes, there would be reflection from the Moon surface, but in that photo what makes you think the sun is up to the right anyway? Looking a the shadows around the LM window top right the sun could well be upper left.
The thing I find the weirdest is the interview they gave when they came back.
Which one? There were hundreds. You mean the official post mission press conference? You only find it 'weird' because online conspiracy theory has told you what to think. You obviously haven't watched the entire footage from start to finish, rather appropriated excerpts from junk conspiracy videos and supposed documentaries that have omitted them laughing and joking.
Having undertaken a rigorous and exhausting programme of training consisting of six day weeks for six months, the mental and physical demands and intensity of the eight day mission, immediate quarantine for three weeks directly before - not to mention the prospect of an exhaustive and exhausting programme of P/R press conferences during a gruelling world tour consisting of 29 cities in 24 countries in 38 days...you really expect them to be bouncing off the walls with enthusiasm? Neil Armstrong in particular was a particularly introverted, private, shy and modest individual. A demonstrably brave test pilot and astronaut, but the thought of being paraded around the world must have filled him with utter dread. However,, characters such as Pete Conrad, Al Shepard, Charlie Duke, Eugene Cernan and Ron Evans all had far more ebullient personalities. Perhaps you should also watch the post mission press conferences for Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and even the aborted Apollo 13 landing that your conspiracy theory never mentions? Whilst at it, find footage and images of them beaming after recovery in the Mobile Quarantine Trailer or on the deck of the USS Hornet
Frankly if that's all it takes to convince you, it's hardly surprising that people of your ilk are the target market for these conmen and frauds that perpetrate crap online conspiracy theory.
The firs press conference was still in spacesuits and held on the aircraft carrier that fished them out of the drink. If you haven't seen it, you are fooling yourself.
Look at the You Tube video titled, "Apollo 11 News Conference". It's been doctored.
Buzz Aldrin reading these comments like: 👁 👄 👁
My favorite moon conspiracy is that Kubrick directed... because there are waaay too many mistakes in the moon landing for Kubrick to have directed lol
@SeaFoxx Exactly, the anomalies are how scientists, engineers, nerds, etc know NASA landed on the Moon. 100 percent of all conspiracy theorists are science illiterate, hence why they have a strong belief in pseudoscience, half-truths, and out-of-context quotes. The only way NASA could have faked the lunar surface EVA's is with a gravitational field generator that's capable of warping / bending localized spacetime inside a custom-built vacuum sound stage. Since that technology is at least a few hundred years away if, at all possible, we can prove beyond a doubt,12 men walked on the Moon.
Good point. And, there is no evidence whatsoever that Kubrick was involved.
Maybe Kubrick deliberately left clues in the footage? The LM docking footage is completely wrong. The moon shakes as the film moves, while the LM movement stays perfectly smooth, which would indicate that the camera was shaking. But the LM movement stays perfectly smooth. Ergo, the LM had to be joined physically to the CM all the time during the filming of the docking for it to not vibrate at all. Also, when you focus on something near the background is normally well in focus also. In the docking footage the LM is in perfect focus, but the moon is 'foggy'. The moon has no atmosphere so why isn't it perfectly in focus?
WRONG. Kubrick was known for leaving clues. You obviously know nothing about Kubrick.
@@WAsmellycat this was a joke haha I’m a huge Kubrick fan. This was a COMPLIMENT, even if it was a joke one. I hope you take blood pressure medicine, getting angry over a comment on UA-cam isn’t healthy 😂
Clickbait with no evidence provided one way or the other
"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is, we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it is a painful process to build it back again."
😂👍
Is the going to the moon or a relationship?. I don't believe him ether.
How do you engineer a flag that looks like it’s moving in the wind on the moon?
It is not moving in the wind
To make it "looks like it's moving in the wind", is to put a horizontal rod across the top, and crumple up the sleeve of the flag on the rod.
Aw shucks, I thought you were gonna tell how they transmitted a live tv signal with a 36 volt power supply.
@G.Gorrell from a quarter million miles away? I wouldn't talk about anybody being ignorant son.
@G.Gorrell NASA blueprints for the LEM, do your own homework, little girl
@@wesfrazier5739 I think the word you're looking for is "schematics", not blueprints. Also, the LM's were built by Grumman Aerospace, little girl.
if the landing was real, why is nasa and other agencies still struggling to take people to space, if they could sucessfully send a manned vehicle to moon 40 years back, i really doubt it. We dont have that technology even now after 40 years. SPACEX and blue origin have failed miserably. If it was true space travel wouldnt have been a big deal now.
Keeping 400,000 people quiet? Ever hear of compartmentalizing? It's not like the guy who made the door latch needed to know what was going. The fact you didn't even think of something as simple as this should make you question all of your thinking.
@ Johnnysinsidethematrix. compartmentalizing? Maybe if you were building an interior door latch at a shop with 27 employees. Not a latch for a spacecraft, aircraft, racecar, passenger vehicle . .😉38,000 at NASA and another 375,000 employed by 20,000 subcontracting aerospace, industrial firms, universities, etc My uncle worked for Grumman Aerospace in Bethpage, NY They designed, engineered, and manufactured the Apollo LEM He sat around for 13 years getting paid to work on a circus prop. LOL, Where do you work.? Does your company pay you a salary for incomplete work? The B -2 bomber cost a billion per plane. They're fake, no one knew they weren't supposed to fly. Wake up.
@@Godscountry2732 D-Day was kept secret until the last moment, although ultimately it involved hundreds of thousands. You think the privates knew when they were going to disembark? They didn't. High grade weapons are also built like this, with only a few at the top gettimg the whole picture. Sorry to tell you but your uncle was fooled with the rest of america. Gus Grissom and Thomas Baron also knew this. You proved nothing, congratulations.
You actually believe that 50 years ago, man went to the moon and back 6 times in a span of less than 3 years, twice a year? All during Tricky Dicks administration.That 12 men walked on the moon, and that they took three cars and played golf? That they spoke to the president directly, and emitted live television from the moon with 60s technology? A distance 1000 times greater than any astronaut has gone since. That they lost the telemetry data and that they recorded over original Apollo tapes as if it was a rerun of the Cosby Show? ...And no one has done it since. Not the russians, not Musk, not China, not Gates... No one.
Not even once.
I have a rocketship to sell you.
@@johnnyreality The beauty of science is that it stands up to skepticism. Arguing" about whether we went to the Moon is like arguing about " Is the earth a flat disk on a turtle's back?. You have to actually prove these crazy conspiracy claims and that has never happened.
It would be like you claiming the 842 lbs /382 kgs of lunar rock and soil aren't from the Moon or they were collected by thousands of robotic missions. Without scientific proof, what do you have.?Nothing, just an opinion. Opinions don't solve problems or answer questions.
You have to actually prove these crazy conspiracy claims and that has never happened.
It all comes down to trust. Should we ask to the lunar geologist who's spent his life studying lunar geology or some guy on the internet who says trees grow on the Moon and space is fake.? I'm going with the lunar geologists. How about you.?
@@Godscountry2732 you don't know me or my credentials. Where are those rocks? Have you seen them? How do you know where they came from? Would those be like the fossilised wood the Apollo 11 astronauts gave to the dutch prime minister, passing it as lunar rocks? Did you know SS officer and father of the Apollo program Wernher von Braun actually went to Antarctica in 1966-67 together with other NASA management members to search for meteorites? You can't say this is like the flat earth theory which could be disproved with a weather balloon and a gopro. The ludicrous apollo claims are much harder to prove/disprove as no telescope has the capacity to see any of the hardware supposedly left on the moon. Not even Hubble can do that. Do yourself a favor and go watch the interview of the Apollo 11 astronauts when they returned to earth. Seriously, do it, then read the comment section. If you don't, I'll know you're brainwashed and that I can't help you. Sometimes patriotism is blinding, specially if your uncle was a part of it. Whatever happened to the 500 page Baron report? You answered nothing (they lost the telemetry data of the biggest engineering feat of all mankind? Really?) and proved nothing so I am not sure what science you're talking about.
Speaking of brainwashing, SS officer Wernher von Braun's friend, Adolf Hitler, wrote in Mein Kampf:
"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true within itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."
some things are top secret like the atomic bomb development, the D day landings. The apollo missions were no way secret, the mission was told to the world by JFK. Most of the work was not secret, the inertial navigation system was I believe was top secret though.
This landing was faker than the love you feel for your richest old uncle you've never went to visit in person.
No one ever questions the landscape in these pictures. Rocks lying on the surface like in the moon shots can only happen in an atmosphere. There is no way these rocks can get on top of the dust without leaving a crater or rolling trail!
Your "questioning" is badly done.
@@theonewiththeeyeoftruth884 no he actually has a valid point even if the way he's trying to describe it is a little scratchy... I know what he's talking about... Those moon rocks they supposedly found and brought back, were different colored than the surface and it had life in the rock... The rock was from earth fam.
@@YizzyBeBuzy-COPRODO
No. That's all wrong. There is nothing wrong or inconsistent about the rocks.
@@theonewiththeeyeoftruth884 Your still in the Public zone... It's kinda like a park, it's a public place it's common.. I'm more like in a concert, that you most likely have to pay money for the tickets... There were no rocks they brought back that had a different color and life because the rock wasn't from the moon... That's all I was saying... Believe it or not there is credible scrutiny of the Moon landing out there... There is also credible facts that we did go to the edge of space. If your not sure what that is, it still in our atmosphere right before you exit, then into the Van Allen radiation belts with dangerous amounts of radiation for anything physical or biological... Those are FACTS
@@YizzyBeBuzy-COPRODO
You concert is the _cult_ where no one knew what was actually in the Kool-Aid.
I've seen _all_ the "scrutiny" of the Moon LandingS (landingS, you probably didn't know there were more than one). None of it holds up.
They brought back rocks from the Moon. Geologists world-wide have confirmed this. Nothing challenges it.
There is no edge of space. It goes on indefinitely.
Edge of space still in our atmosphere? What is that? Flat earth and the firmament? Totally ridiculous.
"You know when youre on earth and take a picture at night and cant see the stars? Its the same on the moon because of exposure". Now Im not an astrophysicist, but ive heard of an atmosphere before. So they went to the moon and took no pictures of the trillions of stars surrounding them? But people constantly post food pics of cheerios, makes sense.
So, you've heard of an atmosphere? Really?
What does an atmosphere have to do with light exposure in photography?
What does astrophysics have to do with photographic exposure?
Why would they waste time and resources taking pictures of the stars while on the moon?
@@BigRalphSmith Astronauts not interested in stars.
nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradictio_in_terminis
Getbuckets.Close but no cigar.....Space is a vacuum, hence it's black during the daytime sun. Earth has an atmosphere, hence the blue sky during the daytime. On the lunar surface, it was daytime, the sun was shining. A lunar day lasts around 28 earth days. Seeing and photographing stars in the daytime sun is pretty difficult. They did photograph stars using a telescope and special optics,etc as well as on the far side [lunar orbit ]out of the sun's glare. But despite what some scientists claimed, almost all of the 12 Apollo astronauts stated they saw no stars in the daytime sun. Had they tried to expose a large bright star, the image would have been washed out. overexposed.
It's the same reason you can't see the stars in the daytime in the first place !!
@@BigRalphSmithright, because after spending what would equate to billions by today's money, they don't want to spend a few hundred bucks and a few minutes taking pictures of stars, yet they are playing golf on the moon. Makes perfect sense.
You had me all the way up till the engineered flag to move in space and the explanation for it, that is like so farfetched to me and way too convinient.
The flag flapping was made to create a sense of pride for America and if the flag was not like that it would probably feel less amazing that America succeeded on their journey to the moon
I can picture a stiff flag that stand out and away from the pole, but without ambient motion. but that flag had ambient motion, and no one was touching it, and no wind of course. So... magnets?
@@deejin25 Rod along the top, in a sewn pocket, on a normal nylon flag. You can actually see where it is in some of the photos.
@@deejin25 video says it took NASA engineers to figure how to do that. Great job if you can get it. 😂😴
But the earth is flat too and chocolate comes from brown cows😂
Wow... a whole two minute video which says so little.
Yeah I'm convinced 😂😂😂
Well the first 7 seconds do.
if the landing was real, why is nasa and other agencies still struggling to take people to space, if they could sucessfully send a manned vehicle to moon 40 years back, i really doubt it. We dont have that technology even now after 40 years. SPACEX and blue origin have failed miserably. If it was true space travel wouldnt have been a big deal now. my question why were these 2 stooges chosen to be a part of this drama. With the technology they had back in 60's and with the the technology we have now in 2022, I dont believe even 1 % of this story, just a big lie.
It’s all fake
Are the rocks shadows in the background at .09 way out of sync with the flag and pole shadows or am I wrong ?
your wrong
Questions are not conspiracy theories
Absolutely - so long as they are legitimate ones. The problem with conspiracy theorists and the dumb believers in their nonsense is that they aren't remotely interested in the answers.
That's the reason after so many decades they never tried to go back
What is the reason they went back 46 times with unmanned missions?
@@DeputyNordburg that's the point
@@pratik7590 It's cheaper safer and more effective to go unmanned is the point?
Even with all the technologies we have today, no one can get to the moon, mankind has only made it to 200 miles above earth orbit. Moon is 238,900 miles away. !
@@letitsnow8518 The moon is in Earth orbit lol.
That's one giant soundstage for man, one giant hoax for mankind.
theyre trying to ride the wave of real content creators.
The moon reflected the light right, but yet the small rocks on the ground facing away from the sun are in total darkness on the shadow side?
That is right reflection. The technical team at NVIDIA, which provides GPU devices that enable high-speed computer calculations for Google Earth and other applications, recreated images of the moon landing on a computer in order to improve visual expression technology. Using their GPU equipment and VXGI (Voxel Global Illumination) technology, which expresses light as images, they succeeded in creating detailed computer modeling of how sunlight hits the lunar surface. It was announced that the light shadows in the reproduced lunar landing footage matched the lighting conditions in photographs taken during the Apollo program.
It wasn’t hard to keep the secret because there really wasn’t anyone working on it
according to 2:13 the astronaut suit is reflecting indicating the sun's direction. How then are the rock shadows indicating the sun in the opposite direction ?
NASA : yeah so we can’t go to the moon today cuz of van allen radiation belts, somehow we went in 1969 but we lost that technology and lost all the video footage. Oopsie!
Wrong.
We can’t trust any government tbh love the name
@I identify as Randy Savage CAN go down to -280f and CAN go up to 260f
@I identify as Randy Savage space suits: am i a joke to you?
@leonardimas1 Ok, smart guy. What data was lost? Be specific.
The problem is if they're explaining, them I'm doubting. If it really happened, they wouldn't waste their time. Or they'd be busy going back and forth moonwise.
But other conspiracy theorists claim it "proves they're right" when they DON"T waste their time. Which is it?
If the moon landings really happened USA Today would not be explaining?
NASA
No
Alternative
Speculation
Accepted