1973 Plymouth Duster & Valiant vs Chevrolet Nova and Ford Maverick Dealer Promo Film

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 155

  • @davidbachim7891
    @davidbachim7891 5 років тому +23

    These compare films are great. Love watch them.

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 8 місяців тому +4

    A very cute model back then. Now, purple hair and sleeve tattoos

  • @maryrafuse2297
    @maryrafuse2297 5 років тому +26

    And in 73 most women weren't plastered with tattoos either. One could see their healthy skin. Skin the largest organ within the human body. Kind of important to keep it healthy.

    • @tonyw973
      @tonyw973 5 років тому

      My BIL had a 318 Duster (yellow) that not only looked really sharp but performed reasonably well too. It was no road-burner but it could at least get out of its own way. I can't say that about the Cordoba he got a few years later.

    • @CJColvin
      @CJColvin Рік тому

      Exactly mate

  • @scarletmacaw
    @scarletmacaw 2 роки тому +7

    This is the life I want so badly to go back to. Where women were women and cars were cars. Everything today sucks.

    • @CJColvin
      @CJColvin Рік тому +1

      Exactly mate

    • @juanzuniga7343
      @juanzuniga7343 3 місяці тому

      Now the Nova thinks its a Duster and the Duster feels like a Maverick 😂

  • @SpockvsMcCoy
    @SpockvsMcCoy 4 роки тому +8

    The millions of dollars that Chrysler spent to tool for the 1970 Plymouth Duster and later Dodge Demon had been initially allocated for a heavy facelift of the 1969 Plymouth Valiant 2- and 4-Door Sedans. The individuals who went against upper management put their careers at risk but in the end that decision paid off because sales were strong.

  • @deckerhand12
    @deckerhand12 5 років тому +13

    It’s a shame they don’t make cars or car ads like this anymore.

    • @kennethsouthard6042
      @kennethsouthard6042 4 роки тому +3

      This wasn't for TV, it was for dealerships. I'm not sure if it was ever to be shown to prospects, but salesmen were to watch it to keep abreast of selling points.

  • @paulsheehan8185
    @paulsheehan8185 2 роки тому +2

    1972, ELECTRONIC IGNITION WAS STD. ON ALL CHRYSLER PRODUCTS, (1973 IN CANADA).

  • @Tnenamrep2
    @Tnenamrep2 2 роки тому +2

    ...and after a cruise in their '73 Valiant, George and his wife arrived in a timely manner for their Newport cigarette ad photo shoot. They arrived refreshed, and alive with pleasure.

  • @Drchainsaw77
    @Drchainsaw77 5 років тому +18

    And yet, Chrysler never made a Dart/Valiant wagon on the '67-'76 A-body platform. Big mistake!

    • @rightlanehog3151
      @rightlanehog3151 5 років тому +4

      Tragic mistake, they might have been the best American car ever.

    • @Drchainsaw77
      @Drchainsaw77 5 років тому +4

      @@rightlanehog3151 Just think how many more A-bodies would still be on the road today. I'd build me a wagon and a Dart Sport, and never need another car again.

    • @nlpnt
      @nlpnt 5 років тому +4

      Never offered in America. There was one in Australia. They should've repatriated the body dies when Oz went on to a new, bigger, pricier Valiant for '72 (it was considered a full-size car there) and had a compact wagon by '73 instead of '76.

    • @rightlanehog3151
      @rightlanehog3151 5 років тому +6

      @@Drchainsaw77 It reminds me of the greatest American engine NEVER made, the Slant 6 with multi-port fuel injection :)

    • @zwxq3
      @zwxq3 3 роки тому

      Volare started in 1976 I think, they were A body wagons.
      And they look so cool..

  • @doogiemcdougster6740
    @doogiemcdougster6740 4 роки тому +4

    Another selling point they forgot to mention: the big front bench seating area is perfect for making out and gettin’ busy.

  • @glennzevallos2841
    @glennzevallos2841 5 років тому +11

    1:12 you could also let the air out of the raft, that would be another way to make it fit

    • @bertgrau9246
      @bertgrau9246 5 років тому +4

      True, but when you get to the water you would have to blow it up again, which could be a real pain.

    • @boisegameshowguy
      @boisegameshowguy Рік тому

      @@bertgrau9246 and naturally, there are downsides to buying a pump to help you out, and the added cost of installing a roof rack as well. So many trade-offs, so little time.

  • @jamesthomas7977
    @jamesthomas7977 4 роки тому +6

    Interestingly they tote the greatness of the vent windows (wind wings) but in the 71 Satellite video, they tote the new ventless glass.
    They can't seem to be able to decide which is better.

    • @barryervin8536
      @barryervin8536 3 роки тому +1

      I paid extra for the vent windows in my 86 Escort (only to find that they would only open 1/2" because they hit the mirrors. Clever engineering, Ford).

  • @dragonboypayne21
    @dragonboypayne21 5 років тому +6

    That's my MOPAR!😍

  • @nlpnt
    @nlpnt 5 років тому +5

    There's a lot of wasted hood length in a gen 2 Nova, it was the style in '68. The '67-up Valiant was stuck with the 1963 hard points, and the space efficiency served it well. The Valiant sedan got a stretch to 111" wb the year after this by using the Dart body, all three extra inches were usable rear legroom.

    • @michaeltutty1540
      @michaeltutty1540 3 роки тому +2

      What they did not mention is that the Scamp was on the longer Dart wheelbase, as it used the Swinger body with a left over 1971 Dart back bumper and the Valiant front clip. Scamp and Dodge Demon/Dart Sport and the 74-76 Valiant sedans had front and rear wheel wells off different cars, and it showed.

  • @CarminesRCTipsandTricks
    @CarminesRCTipsandTricks 4 роки тому +6

    They never mention it's surprising traction for a RWD "compact"....
    I usually had trouble getting to work on snowy days in my Maverick.
    Then I went all over town in the Shop's Duster, with few issues!

    • @barryervin8536
      @barryervin8536 3 роки тому +2

      Maybe the 2 cars had different tires? Tires are by far the biggest variable in traction in snow, given similar weight distribution. I've owned tires that claimed to be "All Season" that were completely useless in snow, while different tires on the same car transformed it into a completely different driving experience.

    • @CarminesRCTipsandTricks
      @CarminesRCTipsandTricks 3 роки тому +1

      @@barryervin8536 You're absolutely right about Tires. The best first upgrade!!
      But besides that, the Duster had something that the competition didn't...
      A LOT of rear overhang and a higher percentage of weight over the rear Wheels.
      It made a difference...
      But Tires do have a significant benefit. I was able to drive a Mustang GT in the Snow!❄❄❄ Probably only because of an excellent set of Winter Tires.

    • @firedemon2166
      @firedemon2166 3 роки тому +1

      The salt would kill me

  • @johnogo7886
    @johnogo7886 5 років тому +6

    No car like a Mopar!

    • @larryjensen1388
      @larryjensen1388 5 років тому +1

      Mopars were endless money pits

    • @chargermaster3716
      @chargermaster3716 5 років тому +2

      Larry Jensen in quotes by Scotty Kilmer lol even Chrysler had issues quality control in 1973

    • @larryjensen1388
      @larryjensen1388 5 років тому +1

      @@chargermaster3716my 1967 Dodge charger the transmission kept going out three times in two years 727 torqueflite 383 Carter quadrajet true dual exhaust

    • @ericball6000
      @ericball6000 5 років тому +1

      @@larryjensen1388 sorry Larry,Dodge did not make a 1967 charger.

    • @larryjensen1388
      @larryjensen1388 5 років тому +3

      @@ericball6000 I'm glad you're so knowledgeable you must be a millennial do your research 1966 and 1967 both were fastback 1968 they went to the dukes of Hazzard style

  • @datacreed
    @datacreed 4 роки тому +4

    don't forget the undercoating George. That's extra

  • @christopherconard2831
    @christopherconard2831 5 років тому +7

    A full sized spare? What a concert! Has anyone let current car manufacturers in on this secret?

    • @deckerhand12
      @deckerhand12 5 років тому +2

      Christopher Conard there are few cars that don’t even give you a spare tire

    • @pawelwisniewski6849
      @pawelwisniewski6849 5 років тому +1

      Most luxury brands don’t have them now , kind of deal breaker for me if you ask

    • @gregorykern9679
      @gregorykern9679 5 років тому +2

      What a concert? I heard no music, I saw no band. Did you mean C O N C E P T ??

    • @172-e5s
      @172-e5s 5 років тому +1

      @@gregorykern9679 I was about to ask him that myself. No sense proof reading what you just wrote I guess. Hilarious

    • @1983jblack
      @1983jblack 4 роки тому +3

      @@deckerhand12
      Few? More like all of them it seems. They give you a repair kit and a donut is now an option. I miss the days of when cars had the little things - Full size spare, under hood light, thicker carpet instead of a thin rug, split bench seats. Keep in mind I'm only in my later 30s but remember these features very well in cars years ago

  • @jrobdickson8498
    @jrobdickson8498 2 роки тому +2

    Just remember to bring an extra ballast resistor-

  • @pyre78
    @pyre78 4 роки тому +3

    What they're leaving out is that the Duster cost $400 more than the Maverick in 1973. A whopping $2,309 in 2020 money, and huge when you consider that a Maverick only cost $1,995 in 1973. :)

    • @potter660
      @potter660 8 місяців тому

      That was 1970 when the Maverick still cost $1,995. By 1973, the base price had gone up by $200-300 due to inflation, emission controls, 5 mph bumpers and upgrading of standard equipment.

  • @jorgeh1680
    @jorgeh1680 4 роки тому +3

    Looks like it was filmed in beautiful Palm Springs!

  • @petemedina8446
    @petemedina8446 5 років тому +7

    Interesting I didn't know the back seat folded down nice feature back then

    • @larryjensen1388
      @larryjensen1388 5 років тому +3

      My 1967 Dodge charger had rear folding bucket seats and an access panel that folded into the the trunk made lots of room

    • @patcurrie9888
      @patcurrie9888 4 роки тому

      We had a 72, didn't know it could fold down, maybe a new feature for 73 on Duster (since they focused on it so much)

    • @piratepete-thetruthisforevery1
      @piratepete-thetruthisforevery1 3 роки тому +2

      It was an option... they don't fold down unless you bought it that way.

  • @kennethsouthard6042
    @kennethsouthard6042 4 роки тому +6

    Styling wise, the Maverick was the dud especially from the back.

    • @kennethsouthard6042
      @kennethsouthard6042 4 роки тому +2

      @silverbird58 Your probably right when you look at the overall shape of the car. I was talking as compared to the Duster and the Nova when they came out. The Maverick's finishing features, especially, the rear end treatment with those tail lights that were shared with the Pinto looked cheap compared to its competition.

  • @landyachtfan79
    @landyachtfan79 5 років тому +3

    2:32......Yeah, plenty of room for the groceries, but in the next shot, the bag is right on the opening, so OF COURSE the lid caught on it!!!!!!

    • @Beethoven80
      @Beethoven80 5 років тому +1

      By the way, a very stupid way to argue against the convenience of a hatchback opening. They just couldn't get their body stable enough or didn't want to spend the money.

    • @172-e5s
      @172-e5s 5 років тому +2

      Those shopping bag comparisons were VERY lame. Even if it could stand up what's gonna happen at the first corner?

    • @danr1920
      @danr1920 4 роки тому +1

      The back end of the hatch are was really shallow.

  • @PockyFiend
    @PockyFiend 4 роки тому +5

    George looks a lot like Lee Majors, pre-"Six Million Dollar Man."

  • @powerwagon3731
    @powerwagon3731 4 роки тому +2

    My parents bought a new 72 Maverick, for some reason I hated that car even though it was ok. I’m strictly a Mopar man since my first car a 68 Sattellite 383, 4 sod. I loved that car I bought in 78.

  • @patrickmcgoldrick8234
    @patrickmcgoldrick8234 2 роки тому +1

    Those Valiant and Darts were some of Mopiles better cars of that time. Great drive trains solid bodies tough cars.

  • @538frostrd
    @538frostrd 5 років тому +1

    The Duster was my 1st car for 400.00. It smoked like a locomotive and had a 3 inch dogtrack.

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 8 місяців тому +1

    Like this channel

  • @aarongranda7825
    @aarongranda7825 5 років тому +3

    Hornet sportabout was the only compact wagon in 73.

    • @58sportsuburban
      @58sportsuburban 5 років тому +1

      Vega, and pinto were also available

    • @manthony225
      @manthony225 4 роки тому +1

      @@58sportsuburban Pinto and Vega were subcompacts

    • @danr1920
      @danr1920 4 роки тому +1

      @@58sportsuburban Subcompacts.

  • @scottschlossberg3137
    @scottschlossberg3137 3 роки тому +2

    Al Bundy approves

  • @williamhalpin6713
    @williamhalpin6713 4 роки тому +2

    I had a maverick back parked it and bought a new Ranchero in 73 maverick just transportation. Friend had a new 73 Duster awesome car 318 with a 4 speed. wow how times have changed

  • @Timbrock1000
    @Timbrock1000 2 роки тому

    AT 4:26. That folding vinyl sunroof.
    I had one similar to that on a 1989 Subaru Justy I once had.

  • @rightlanehog3151
    @rightlanehog3151 5 років тому +8

    Just give up Ford and Chevy, in '73 you don't have a chance.

    • @nlpnt
      @nlpnt 5 років тому +3

      The Nova facelift that year seems really halfhearted. Apparently some of GM's overseas subsidiaries agreed, they either stuck with the '68-72 look or built an X-body "Chevy" with the Buick Skylark front.

    • @danr1920
      @danr1920 4 роки тому +2

      @@nlpnt Agree, the face lift never worked for me. Just didn't look right.

  • @twagn
    @twagn 5 років тому +2

    Great deer hunting car...

  • @paulsheehan8185
    @paulsheehan8185 2 роки тому +1

    I LIKED THE BIG BUMPER GUARDS STD. ON ALL CHRYSLER CARS.

  • @82ghall
    @82ghall 3 роки тому +1

    there's something about Mary

  • @Timbrock1000
    @Timbrock1000 2 роки тому

    AT 4:27, I once had a Subaru Justy with a sunroof like that! 😆

  • @mikeallmon1
    @mikeallmon1 5 років тому +2

    makes you wonder why they didn't do a hatch like GM X bodies..

    • @danr1920
      @danr1920 4 роки тому +1

      Limited resources at Chrysler.

  • @frozenbits48
    @frozenbits48 5 років тому +1

    George seems to wear that same shirt all the time.

  • @tommyreid2317
    @tommyreid2317 4 роки тому +1

    I'm mopar or no car ,but 72 was the last duster that looked good. 73 had ugly bumpers and tail lights.

  • @aarongranda7825
    @aarongranda7825 5 років тому +1

    What about hornet? Did the Nova have the 307? I didn't know Nova had a frame. The pass thru is standard on a lot of Japanese compacts now.

    • @powerwagon3731
      @powerwagon3731 4 роки тому +1

      Aaron Granda It’s called a subframe, it supports the engine , transmission and front fenders, etc.

    • @CarminesRCTipsandTricks
      @CarminesRCTipsandTricks 4 роки тому +1

      It's the same Subframe setup as the Camaro/Firebird. All HP F Body parts fit Nova.
      All HP parts for 66-68 Mustang fit Maverick...
      Couldn't say the same for Duster.

    • @danr1920
      @danr1920 4 роки тому +1

      If they had the Hornet, it would have beat them all!

    • @michaeltutty1540
      @michaeltutty1540 3 роки тому +2

      @@CarminesRCTipsandTricks The funny thing is that all the luxury bits, include fuel injected 351 and rear disc brakes from a Versailles bolt right on to everything from a 60-69 Falcon, Comet, Maverick, 64-73 Mustang, 67-73 Cougar, and the first generation Grenada and Monarch. They are all the same car. I know someone needed to repair the front floor in a Grenada. The 71-73 Cougar front floor was identical, making the repair dead easy.

  • @beyondlife6081
    @beyondlife6081 2 роки тому

    Man I hope to get that truck space in a 70 71 cuda

  • @CJColvin
    @CJColvin Рік тому

    1973 was the year of the oil embargo and the year of the movie the Wickerman.

  • @boisegameshowguy
    @boisegameshowguy Рік тому

    I’d love to have a hatchback for my next car, so I can lay out a blanket on a hot day and watch a drive in movie

  • @davidross5254
    @davidross5254 2 роки тому

    I have a 73 valiant, just came to see ads for it

  • @CJColvin
    @CJColvin Рік тому

    1973 was the year of the oil crisis going on in America 🇺🇸.

  • @nicholasrice6933
    @nicholasrice6933 4 роки тому

    I love how they say 302 is small ...like 318 cubic inches ate so much bigger.

  • @woxyroxme
    @woxyroxme 2 роки тому +1

    Who would not take any of these 3 cars compared to the crap on the road now? Ugly SUV? No thanks. Wish they would have done the dart as a retro like the challenger, would have bought one in a heartbeat

    • @CJColvin
      @CJColvin Рік тому

      Right, same thing with the 04-06 Pontiac GTOs.

  • @johnathanstevens8436
    @johnathanstevens8436 3 роки тому +1

    Space Duster!

  • @kiprandom7208
    @kiprandom7208 5 років тому +3

    I'll send take a space duster with a 318, and sunroof please? Does it come in Green with orange plaid interior and a mod top?

    • @nlpnt
      @nlpnt 5 років тому +1

      Plaid interior was black/white, green or blue for '73 and the mod tops were long gone. They might be able to special order an orange car with green plaid, or I'm sure green-on-green would be on the lot. www.hamtramck-historical.com/images/dealerships/colorAndTrim/1973/73_Valiant_Duster0007.jpg

  • @EdwardCheek
    @EdwardCheek 4 роки тому

    I had this car used and loved it. It was not nearly as reliable as my Ford and GM cars. But when it ran it was a pleasure to drive.

  • @unclenoidentity186
    @unclenoidentity186 4 роки тому +1

    Syd Dale Artful Dodger

  • @HALWG51
    @HALWG51 4 роки тому

    My father-in-law bought a 1973 Duster brand new. It had the 318 engine and from day one it was nothing but trouble. It had numerous problems, the worst of which was stalling and hesitation. At the worst possible times. Like in the middle of an intersection. They never could get it running right and he finally got rid of it in 1975 and bought a Buick. He never bought another Chrysler product.

    • @michaeltutty1540
      @michaeltutty1540 3 роки тому +3

      I can tell you what was wrong. The float in the carburetor was too high, allowing gas to slosh over and flood the engine. Quite common and seemed to stump mechanics at the time, but well known now. Was worse on 2bbl carbs. The 4bbl seemed easier to set the float properly.

    • @unitedcity_mc4421
      @unitedcity_mc4421 9 місяців тому

      A '73 Duster was plagued with issues? Impossible!

  • @daviddennison4287
    @daviddennison4287 3 роки тому

    Nicest one I had was low mileage 318 NO RUST gave to my gf 😔 she ran it into a stone wall she was ok car took a beating then we broke up and I bought a Vega wagon 350 engine swap

  • @sneaks01
    @sneaks01 5 років тому +1

    Was television really this bad back then? I’m a 70s kid. Haha

    • @CarminesRCTipsandTricks
      @CarminesRCTipsandTricks 4 роки тому

      Yeah.... It really was. The GI Joe and Lionel Commercials were kinda cool.

    • @Scott_From_Maine
      @Scott_From_Maine 4 роки тому +3

      This is a dealer training film, has nothing to do with television.

    • @martyduncan2636
      @martyduncan2636 4 роки тому +3

      These films weren’t on television. They were shown at the car dealerships.

  • @freedomisntfree2089
    @freedomisntfree2089 4 роки тому +2

    Always thought the mavericks looked like a frog. Dusters ok, but those Nova's are legendary timeless classic

  • @joserafaelgrangefuenmayor7744

    Me gustan los tres carros Plymouth Duster, Valiant, Ford Maverick y Chevrolet Nova 1973; en el Ford Maverick; me pongo a imaginar a dos muchachas; solteras, libres, sin compromiso, sin hijos, sin tatuajes, ni piercings, ni implantes en sus cuerpos; la pelirroja y la rubia; la pelirroja es blanca, ojos verdosos y cabello rojizo; ella viste un vestido azul oscuro; con una blusa blanca manga larga; la cara maquillada, los labios rojos; el cabello arreglado; la rubia; ella es blanca, ojos azules oscuros, cabello rubio, la cara maquillada, los labios rojos, el cabello arreglado; ella viste una blusa blanca manga larga; minifalda azul oscuro, calcetines canilleros blancos y gomas blancas; la pelirroja va manejando el carro; la rubia va en el asiento del pasajero; yo voy en el asiento trasero del carro; es un Ford Maverick 1973 de cuatro puertas; color marrón claro con techo de vinilo; motor 302 V8; transmisión automática; aire acondicionado y frenos de disco en las cuatro ruedas; cuando todo se estabilize en Venezuela mi país; me voy para Mérida por asuntos de trabajo; me voy para Mérida por San Cristóbal; solamente para pasear y descansar; para dar un paseo por los pueblos del Estado Táchira; nos vamos para Mérida por asuntos de trabajo; voy a trabajar con Alexis Montilla y sus parques temáticos Los Aleros y La Venezuela de Antier (turno mañana) y La Montaña de Los Sueños (turno tarde); cuando todo se estabilize en Venezuela mi país; me iré para Mérida; por asuntos de trabajo si Dios quiere; saludos y buenas noches.

  • @TheCarCrazyGuy
    @TheCarCrazyGuy 4 роки тому +2

    Maverick offers Pinto tail lamps. Nova and Duster don’t. A win for Ford. 😂😂😂😂

  • @LakeHowellDigitalVideo
    @LakeHowellDigitalVideo 5 років тому +4

    8:27 Yuck. A Duster 340 with whitewalls and wheel covers. I'm blind.

    • @nlpnt
      @nlpnt 5 років тому

      I'll take one, but in B-1 blue with stripe delete to make it a full sleeper. Make it a four-speed car with blue plaid interior.

    • @172-e5s
      @172-e5s 5 років тому

      It has a limp-wrist look to it

  • @williamg2552
    @williamg2552 Рік тому

    The Duster is a PLYMOUTH VALIANT.
    So is the SCAMP .

  • @peyo19795
    @peyo19795 5 років тому +3

    Nova with a 350 for me

  • @paulsheehan8185
    @paulsheehan8185 2 роки тому

    YOU HAVE TO ORDER A NOVA WITH A THREE SPEED AUTO, OTHERWISE, YOU GET THE TWO SPEED AUTO.

  • @richardpasquale5930
    @richardpasquale5930 5 років тому +2

    I had a Duster I never had a car thar had as many rattles and started to rot after 3 years

    • @devonmask5192
      @devonmask5192 5 років тому +1

      They looked good, but yup. The tin worm loved 'em. Let me guess: the tops of the front fenders next to the hood rotted through first?

    • @richardpasquale5930
      @richardpasquale5930 5 років тому

      @@devonmask5192 You are correct also under the headlights

    • @devonmask5192
      @devonmask5192 5 років тому +1

      Everywhere front wheel well liners (that they didn't have) would have deflected salt/water spray. Also loved having to keep a spare 'Highland Hummingbird' starter motor around. And boy, they sure did love ranking on coil springs, until you experienced replacing a worn out to-the-point-of-pasta, rusted in place torsion bar. They were good looking cheap cars, but they were still very cheap, lousy built cars.

    • @172-e5s
      @172-e5s 5 років тому +1

      As an Autobody and Paint Tech I worked on LOTS of those things. Absolute garbage, even when brand new. Even the sound when you close the doors makes your teeth hurt. The worst of the worst, for sure. That went for all Mopars back then.

    • @richardpasquale5930
      @richardpasquale5930 5 років тому +1

      @@172-e5s Still holds true today

  • @timpriddy349
    @timpriddy349 2 роки тому

    porch bumpers galore.......ugh

  • @hugglescake
    @hugglescake 4 роки тому

    I'm prettier than George.