🔴 RNAV & RNP THE DIFFERENCE EXPLAINED FOR PILOTS (2023)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 85

  • @peterhughes3609
    @peterhughes3609 3 роки тому +29

    Thanks goodness for this video. I finally have the answers I'm searching for without trawling through books and notes for hours! (CPL holder student pilot training for ME IR, who apparently has forgotten most of the Radio Navigation subject!) Thanks again!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  3 роки тому +1

      Glad it was helpful! best of luck on your IR

  • @jeremy41234
    @jeremy41234 10 місяців тому +5

    2:00 for the definition, 5:00 for the approaches.

  • @ihorkohut7290
    @ihorkohut7290 3 роки тому +13

    Its really good one. Simple, clear, no tonns of unnecessary info. Thanks a lot!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  3 роки тому

      Thanks for watching, I am glad you liked it

  • @steveyford7127
    @steveyford7127 10 днів тому

    Excellent video bro.

  • @captainmarwan5705
    @captainmarwan5705 10 місяців тому +1

    Thank you so much! You helped simplify and clarify all of these concepts in just 8 minutes (ps. I'm a pilot and this helped me to prepare for some interview questions)

  • @karimhasnawi
    @karimhasnawi 3 роки тому +3

    Brilliantly explained thank you sir

  • @charlestex8222
    @charlestex8222 2 роки тому +54

    Sorry, but I think that's partially wrong. You're right about RNP routes requiring onboard monitoring and alerting about navigation performance deviations, but both RNAV- and RNP-approved aircraft should maintain flight within the navigation specification for at least 95% of the time. That's a PBN requirement and, nowadays, RNAV and RNP are both encompassed by the PBN concept (ICAO Doc 9613 Third Edition).

    • @rivaldodasilvaalvesjunior9759
      @rivaldodasilvaalvesjunior9759 Рік тому +1

      Charles,
      Excelente observation. Congratulations!
      I have a question: Are RNAV and RNP considered a PRECISION APPROACH?

    • @santiagolozano5454
      @santiagolozano5454 Рік тому +3

      Just ILS

    • @charlestex8222
      @charlestex8222 Рік тому +3

      @@rivaldodasilvaalvesjunior9759 No. They're considered an "APV" (Approach Procedure with Vertical Guidance), according to ICAO, which lies between Precision Approaches (PA) and Non-Precision Approaches (NPA).
      I might be wrong, but I understand the concept of precision approach requires an electronically-generated glide slope, from an outside antenna, like a GS in an ILS. Hence, the ILS is the only PA.

    • @conned
      @conned Рік тому

      ​@@rivaldodasilvaalvesjunior9759no, hence higher minimums at some AD. They're Quasi -ILS. Or Quasi-GP.

    • @oggybodoggy
      @oggybodoggy 11 місяців тому +1

      @@santiagolozano5454 No, according to ICAO PANS-OPS ILS, MLS and GLS are precision approaches, but also LPV SBAS CAT I aka LPV200

  • @PhilippeBorfiga
    @PhilippeBorfiga Рік тому +1

    Thank you for the clarity of this information !

  • @Photoshopmanipulator
    @Photoshopmanipulator Рік тому +1

    great show. when do you use a RNAV approach and when do a RNP approach

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  Рік тому +1

      Nowadays the names are being used interchangeably. However, keep in mind that RNAV (RNP) approaches are RNP AR (Authorization Required). other RNAV approaches (LNAV, LNAV/VNAV, LPV) are RNAV GPS (SBAS or RAIM) based.

  • @jakew9887
    @jakew9887 3 роки тому +3

    Great presentation. Thanks

  • @1marjus
    @1marjus 3 місяці тому

    Good overview.

  • @cachidril
    @cachidril 2 роки тому +2

    excellent video

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  2 роки тому

      I am glad you liked it. thanks for watching

  • @azharmalik1230
    @azharmalik1230 2 роки тому +1

    Good briefing

  • @ИвайлоЧаушев-о8в
    @ИвайлоЧаушев-о8в 7 місяців тому

    Thanks for this video! It is too benefitly for me!

  • @jairoramirez1077
    @jairoramirez1077 2 роки тому +1

    You are awsome . Greetings from PERU .

  • @omarfaris8273
    @omarfaris8273 Рік тому +1

    I got my checkride tomorrow hopfully this will help, thank you!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  Рік тому

      Good luck!! you can do it

    • @omarfaris8273
      @omarfaris8273 8 місяців тому

      @@ATPLStudent it did go well, and now im watching for CFII lol. thanks again!

    • @henriquealmeida2032
      @henriquealmeida2032 8 місяців тому

      @@omarfaris8273 good luck mate you got it :)
      Im here for the radio navegation atpl exam still ahah

  • @derekpratte7259
    @derekpratte7259 2 роки тому +1

    Well done. Thank you.

  • @MostafaAli-jc4yk
    @MostafaAli-jc4yk Рік тому +1

    Thank you

  • @ChristopherT1
    @ChristopherT1 3 роки тому +1

    Nice job!!

  • @Rhinozherous
    @Rhinozherous 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you very much!

  • @IgnacioCuriel
    @IgnacioCuriel Рік тому +3

    I keep missing what's the difference between RNP and PBN. Is there a chance that you could make a video about the difference? Also, why do LNAV and VNAV show a DA on the charts, even though they're not precision approaches? Thank you!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  Рік тому +7

      Any approach that is flown using the CDFA technique (Constant Descent Final Approach) has got a DA for minimums even if it's not a precision approach. Also please keep in mind that we no longer refer to Approaches as Precision or Non precision anymore. But rather, 2D approach (provides only lateral guidance) and 3D approaches (Lateral as well as vertical guidance).
      as for your first question I suggest you watch the video I have recently uploaded, it explains the difference perfectly. but in short, PBN (Performance Based Navigation) is the "umbrella" so to say under which RNP and RNAV requirements fall.
      PBN is a set of rules, whereas RNP is a set of accuracy and integrity and continuity of the onboard systems that will qualify you to maintain a specific accuracy in a specific airspace or area.
      Hope this helped

  • @coltwendt
    @coltwendt Рік тому

    I have never heard of an IRS being used for RNAV capabilities. Can you explain this?

  • @alexhill6906
    @alexhill6906 3 роки тому +1

    All your videos are great mate! Keep it up

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  3 роки тому

      Thank you for your comment. I am glad you found it helpful

  • @vukkomsija
    @vukkomsija 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  3 роки тому +1

      I am glad you've found it helpful

  • @gutersteinker
    @gutersteinker 3 роки тому +1

    Superb video, is helping a lot with the IFR ground school, but most importantly that it is staying in my mind

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  3 роки тому

      I am glad you liked it, best of luck on your Ground School

  • @FunWorldGame1993
    @FunWorldGame1993 3 роки тому +3

    Excellent video. Just one thing to add. LOC BC is also non-precision approach 😊

  • @C1721-l4m
    @C1721-l4m 2 роки тому +1

    Read about it in chapter 1 of the AIM, but still wasn’t too clear for me. This video helped a lot. Thanks!

  • @NelksLife
    @NelksLife 7 місяців тому

    Good video. Some minor details are incorrect though.

  • @glaremoonlight2695
    @glaremoonlight2695 2 роки тому +1

    Thankyou very much for such an amazing explanation ✨😍

  • @conned
    @conned Рік тому +1

    The certification process is a pain , depending on FOI. Been there, done that!.stick to ILS,

  • @adventurelover6955
    @adventurelover6955 Рік тому +2

    sir, what is WAAS?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  Рік тому +2

      Wide Area Augmentation System is type of SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation System) used in the US. I have made a video explaining all about it, check out my channel

  • @HossainAhmedHossain
    @HossainAhmedHossain 3 місяці тому

    How much does it cost to be a pilot in Qatar ?

  • @rangerrick8220
    @rangerrick8220 2 роки тому +1

    For ILS and LPV approaches - why use the barometer height rather than the DH (radio height) if the barometer height can change? Why not just use RA (DH) all the time ?

    • @lucascardinfranco2011
      @lucascardinfranco2011 2 роки тому +1

      Here where I’m doing my training, for example, there is always a notam saying that RA is unreliable.

    • @rangerrick8220
      @rangerrick8220 2 роки тому +1

      @@lucascardinfranco2011 Ah - thanks.

  • @PilotFootprints
    @PilotFootprints Рік тому

    Thanks for this😁😁

  • @sharklet7779
    @sharklet7779 2 роки тому +1

    What is GPS baro-aided?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  2 роки тому +2

      It is an approach where the lateral guidance is provided by the GPS while the vertical guidance is provided by a computer that uses pressure changes, hence the name “baro” to calculate the vertical profile.

    • @_Ammar__
      @_Ammar__ Рік тому

      @@ATPLStudent how can I now that the aircraft is baro-aided?
      We use a DA-40 and I can find the waas and raim in the gps database.

    • @miket3445
      @miket3445 Рік тому

      Check your aircraft flight manual…..there should be a supp that covers what you can do with your installed system…

  • @DownTheRabbit-Hole
    @DownTheRabbit-Hole Рік тому +1

    LP?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  Рік тому

      Localizer Performance, similar to LOC but SBAS based

  • @MollHyman
    @MollHyman 4 місяці тому

    Perez Ruth Garcia Jason Jones Elizabeth

  • @seyhakvisal5652
    @seyhakvisal5652 3 роки тому +1

    😍😍😍😍😍😍

  • @huggksn4787
    @huggksn4787 2 роки тому +1

    👍👏👏👏👏

  • @alextomes1957
    @alextomes1957 Рік тому +1

    Do you guys also hate digging trough the easa documents?

  • @tomstravels520
    @tomstravels520 2 роки тому +1

    I'm not sure it this is now incorrect as approaches the were RNAV in Europe and now labelled RNP and what was RNP is now RNP-AR (RF legs)

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  2 роки тому

      Indeed, the terminology is changing

  • @BartonBaird-l2m
    @BartonBaird-l2m 3 місяці тому

    Thomas Steven Moore Melissa Hall Laura

  • @KarenJohnson-m8o
    @KarenJohnson-m8o 4 місяці тому

    Wilson Linda Walker Maria Hall Jennifer

  • @ENGLEBRECHTrutch
    @ENGLEBRECHTrutch 4 місяці тому

    Young Thomas Jackson Kimberly Lewis Susan

  • @ptyeueiiwjd
    @ptyeueiiwjd Рік тому +1

    HOT tip to anyone making youtube videos. No one is going to subscribe because you asked them too. You get subscribers from making top tier content. Not from asking nicely. Kind of pointless.

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  Рік тому +1

      A gentle reminder though wouldn't hurt, Thanks for your comment

  • @horaciosanabria461
    @horaciosanabria461 5 місяців тому

    I’m struggling. Anyone knows if I can do an “RNP” approach with a C172?